Something Sensitive

The Something Sensitive Forums => Goon Acres => Topic started by: cis scum 1.0 on January 12, 2014, 03:15:39 PM

Title: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 12, 2014, 03:15:39 PM
TVIV and CineD are two of the worst subforums on all of Something Awful. They are extremely clickish, write 888 essays that rival D&D and absolutely full of the worst faggotry possible. TVIV might be the worst of the worst, it was modded by an ex-pedophile and is tightly controlled by a clique of troons, obese faggots and cat ladies pontificating about trans rights, feminism and racism in fucking sitcoms.

Also, they write like real faggots:

Quote from: soapgish
The subtext of the episode was fabulously penned and executed, no doubt about it, but while a few bits were quite humorous it just wasn't a very funny episode for me. And that's fine as it excelled in other capacities though this season thus far feels like they're going for clever before funny.

And you're in real trouble if you say anything they find remotely offensive

Quote from: Occupation
Quote from: Irish Joe
     They probably don't. She was on Mom this week and when I first saw her I thought she looked like a pug dog in a dress

Hey yo joe I usually spend my time defending you from people who bandwagon about how terrible of a poster you are since posts about your being a terrible poster are terrible posts in and of themselves but this comment was definitely sexist and kinda racist
Quote from: Occupation
Canine comparisons are common insults to both women (bitches) and blacks (junkyard dogs). It's also a shitty thing to say in general but the terms are charged

they will pile up on you if you say something offensive like "Girls is really shit I don't like it and it's stupid to say that people criticize it because they hate women"

Quote from: precision
Thank you. Exactly the point. It has nothing to do with misogyny, which is just a cheap buzzword to hide behind in order to avoid really answering questions in a meaningful way.

No matter how poorly worded a reporter's question, is it really justified to ask back "Do you have a girlfriend? Is she happy with you?"

Fuck Lena Dunham, and fuck Judd Apatow.

pile the fuck on

Quote from: BrooklynBruiser

:frogout: :frogout: :frogout: :frogout:
:frogout: :frogout: :frogout: :frogout:
:frogout: :frogout: :frogout: :frogout:
:frogout: :frogout: :frogout: :frogout:

what the gently caress is wrong with you
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
You still don't get to call misogyny a cheap buzzword.
Quote from: DivisionPost
Yeah, you don't get to call misogyny a cheap buzzword and you don't get to drop that Henry Rollins quote after saying
Quote from: Slamhound
"Professional" and "unprofessional" are cheap buzzwords. Despite conventional wisdom, there are stupid questions and pointing them out and mocking them is perfectly acceptable. What response could that reporter possibly have expected to his question?
Quote from: Division Post
I'm telling you this as calmly as possible:

Just because you say it is, doesn't make it so. In fact, for somebody who obviously long ago decided not to care about these people, you sure jump at the chance to talk about them when the subject comes up. I mean we'd already moved past this conversation, but that didn't stop you from getting your two cents in.

And as far as how you could have phrased yourself better initially? Well, for starters, "They're using misogyny as a cheap buzzword." A small change that makes a world of difference. But there's more, because you insisted on saying more: Your passive-aggressive behavior in your last post would have gone over a little better if you could recognize the self-righteousness within your previous posts -- particularly, having an ugly reaction to someone because they had an ugly reaction to an ugly question.

You're right, precision, we're all friends here, and my definition of friendship is being honest and blunt when I feel it's necessary. So, honestly, bluntly, you're being a dick. And I'm not going to hold it against you too much because I've been a dick in the past and I'm being a dick right now. I will strive to be less of a dick in the future, but like with you, the right subject -- Girls is one of them -- will bring out my Inner Dick. (Go ahead and laugh.) And if you want to know what you can do to be less of a dick? Don't drop quotes about "not hating" when it's obvious that you've got plenty of room for hate, and maybe ease up from talking about shows you clearly don't care for. And yeah, watch how you phrase accusations of decoy misogyny because that can REALLY make you look like a dick.

I'll let you in on a little secret: I stopped watching Girls halfway through season 2. Couldn't hang with the show anymore. When I talk about it, it's usually about how other people talk about it. The show itself no longer interests me, and neither do two of the three personalities behind it (I still like Apatow's movies). So I haven't really talked about the content of the show. I mean, CLEARLY it still hits a nerve with me, but it's got nothing to do with whatever stories are being told. Maybe that's vacuous (for want of the proper word) in its own right. I don't know. Point is, there's a million other things to talk about; when Henry Rollins says "Don't hate," I'd bet money that he also means "Don't waste your time."
Quote from:
precision I think you're a cool guy but your argument reads to me like "I don't like Girls, therefore I'm going to massively overstate the unprofessionalism of the producers compared to the reporter", because gently caress, I don't care how professional I'm meant to be, if someone asked me that question about a show I made I would do far more than make a couple of shots, and it absolutely would have ruined the rest of the event for me. Everything about the way the question was phrased is disgustingly offensive.

I shit you not, as a punishment precision had to write the OP for Girls to be forgiven by the tv couch crew.

Quote from: precision
Hell, I'll do it, just as a mea culpa for my poor word choice earlier. And I swear I won't say anything negative (at least, not in the OP)!

I'll do it tonight unless someone else really has a burning desire to do it.

They do that shit all the time on people they don't like, usually organize on IRC and used to get mod warning when too back off to avoid having their pet thread locked.



so yeah post all the retarded shit that fills both places if you dare read 14000 words about how the last episode of Shield is really a metaphor for 19th century Polish suffragette and modern rape culture.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 12, 2014, 03:34:52 PM
One of the gatekeepers of TVIV is brooklynbruiser. He's constantly on their irc channel and fancies himself one of the thought leaders of the d&d crew. he'll go in other forums specifically to raise shit up with tv iv posters he doesn't like. Especially when he thinks they are racist or sexist or like shows he doesn't.

He was also the driving force with getting Azure_Horizon banned. Not because he was a genuine rapist, but because he fucking hated his guts and found a convenient reason to get him to be banned. If someone had said a gay guy who has sex with other guys who claim they are "straight" but start sucking dick when they are wrong he would call you homophobic and kinkshaming clearly those guys were gays to begin with. I mean he literally has said that in the past discussing a character from a show.

Irish Joe said a certain black actress looked like "a pug in a dress" on last night's episode of some comedy.
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Given the extensive history of comparing black people to dogs being a way of degrading them... Yeah, it was fairly racist.
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Quote from: zoux
You know what's even worse than that? All these posts.

"Guys please don't call out racism, I don't like reading about it."
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Quote from: Rapey Joe Stalin
    Maybe it's a cultural thing distinct to America, and Irish Joe is actually spending his Wednesday nights wearing a pillowcase, but using dogs to describe black people really isn't a thing where I'm from.
It's very much a thing in the USA.

And, just a tip for the future, but perhaps try to not comment on things you aren't familiar with?
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Quote from: thexerox123
Or maybe you could try to recognize that there are people from places aside from the US in this thread? For gently caress's sakes. Do you know for a fact that Irish Joe is from the US, even?

    Since when do you have to be from the US to judge whether or not something is racist?

When talking about an American actress, in an American show, on an American network, it's probably a good idea to have some idea of how comments might be viewed by Americans.
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Do you not see how dehumanizing people by making them sound bestial is a really, really common thing that racists do?
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
And again you show your ignorance - "You're the real racist for noticing racism!" is a depressingly common argument in American racial discourse.

Yeah he keeps on piling on people he doesn't like screaming about racism and sexism all the time. Not just the quotes in the OP but yeah here he goes again:
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Quote from: Irish Joe
    Is Luke Cage a good black series?

What, pray tell, constitutes a "black series"?

And yeah just fucking shrill in general
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
I have no idea what you mean by "gay show," but saying you can't watch something because it's too gay is awfully pejorative.
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Quote from: Austrian mook
    what the gently caress does abelist mean?

Like racist/sexist/classist, but with disabled people.


Oh yeah, and that's what he looks like:
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser" post="419091196
Me and my girlfriend. :3:

(http://i.imgur.com/6IXvC3i.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 12, 2014, 03:36:28 PM
99% of TV and movies are lowest common denominator crap so it's hardly surprising that any group of people devoted to discussion of these topics would be filled with retards.

It's not just that they watch and obsess over bullshit show, it's the fact that they are the vanguards of sjws, punishing wrongthink and worst catladies of the forum. Just look at the guy i did a mini-profile of. I didn't even need to go quote mining everything I just quoted, by the way. I just had to go through the last two/three pages of chat.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on January 12, 2014, 03:39:07 PM
What can you expect from the former fiefdom of Aatrek?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 12, 2014, 03:40:45 PM
i have never heard of black people being compared to dogs
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 12, 2014, 03:45:00 PM
look at tuss thinking these people really care about accuracy and don't use bullshit excuses to bludgeon people they don't like into silence.

No one has ever called black people "junkyard dogs" as a racial slur ever.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: the sip on January 12, 2014, 03:48:19 PM
God forbid you criticize Skyler as a character in a Breaking Bad thread.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Mullah Omar on January 12, 2014, 03:53:28 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkyard_Dog
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/junkyard_dog

Doesn't seem to be a racial slur anywhere...
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on January 12, 2014, 03:59:37 PM
God forbid you criticize Skyler as a character in a Breaking Bad thread.

I imagine if a popular female character Agent Scully or Kara Thrace had a boyfriend/husband who spent his time whining that was spending too much time working or some shit, no one would like him either.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: GFR on January 12, 2014, 04:00:02 PM
i have never heard of black people being compared to dogs

The lower primates, certainly, but never canines. The difference is I'd let a canine into my home.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on January 12, 2014, 04:00:35 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/6IXvC3i.jpg)
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Ultimately, what it comes down to with me for Girls is that the lack of not-white people undercuts the core idea of authenticity. I'm a white 20-something living in NYC. I know people like the characters in Girls. I know a lot of them. I stopped watching Girls because I realized that I simultaneously identified with and utterly loathed the characters. It is a simple fact of living in New York City that your life will regularly include a lot of interaction with people of basically every conceivable background. You can't be a show that is about an authentic New York City experience and not have people of color in it. You just can't.

LISTEN TO THE FAT PASTY WHITE FATFUCK!
 :alex:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 12, 2014, 04:01:56 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkyard_Dog
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/junkyard_dog

Doesn't seem to be a racial slur anywhere...

better: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=junkyard%20dog

Eight definitions, some with multiple entries, and not one has anything to do with race.

And if Urban Fuckin' Dictionary doesn't say that a word can be used to insult blacks, you know with goddamn mathematical certainty that it's never been used that way, ever, in the history of humanity.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 12, 2014, 04:02:19 PM
i mean brooklyndodger stopped watching Girls because while he identifies with a bunch of fat and aimless girls in their 20s living in new york city, it wasn't "diverse enough".

Quote
For the record, it is utterly unrealistic for someone to live in a version of New York City that is as white as Girls' version of New York City.
Quote
"We want to accurately portray New York and groups of people."

The whole POINT is that their version of New York City is inaccurately white!
Quote
I wouldn't care nearly as much if they didn't go on and on about wanting to portray a real and accurate New York. I don't think shows should have to fill quotas, but claiming that accuracy to reality is important to the show and then having it be as white as it is... That's some bullshit right there.
Quote
Ultimately, what it comes down to with me for Girls is that the lack of not-white people undercuts the core idea of authenticity. I'm a white 20-something living in NYC. I know people like the characters in Girls. I know a lot of them. I stopped watching Girls because I realized that I simultaneously identified with and utterly loathed the characters. It is a simple fact of living in New York City that your life will regularly include a lot of interaction with people of basically every conceivable background. You can't be a show that is about an authentic New York City experience and not have people of color in it. You just can't.

All of his own friends are white and most of them online lmao. I'm gonna guess he feels really uncomfortable that he's living in one of the most diverse cities in ameirca and his only friends are other white liberal faggots like him


I mean keep him mind that him, occupation, aatrek and other TV IV guys meet up on IRC friday nights to play a virtual game of dungeons and dragons. Yes, you read that right. :tuss:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on January 12, 2014, 04:06:52 PM
The more I read about these kind of white-guilt ridden, feministic, dickless, arrogant douchebags the angrier I get.  Gen Y is pozzed as fuck.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on January 12, 2014, 04:08:30 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/6IXvC3i.jpg)
Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Ultimately, what it comes down to with me for Girls is that the lack of not-white people undercuts the core idea of authenticity. I'm a white 20-something living in NYC. I know people like the characters in Girls. I know a lot of them. I stopped watching Girls because I realized that I simultaneously identified with and utterly loathed the characters. It is a simple fact of living in New York City that your life will regularly include a lot of interaction with people of basically every conceivable background. You can't be a show that is about an authentic New York City experience and not have people of color in it. You just can't.

LISTEN TO THE FAT PASTY WHITE FATFUCK!
 :alex:

I'd also like to point out, that ISN'T his girlfriend, it's just some poor girl traveling too close to him and couldn't escape from his gravity well.

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_3wstnmU2u8/T6INWqEvqGI/AAAAAAAAEmQ/sDOWxUs_dbA/s1600/blackholeposter.png)

REVERSE ENGINES! OH GOD I PASSED THE EVENT HORIZON!!!!! HELPPPPPPPMEEEEEEEE!!!

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 12, 2014, 04:18:44 PM
I mean keep him mind that him, occupation, aatrek and other TV IV guys meet up on IRC friday nights to play a virtual game of dungeons and dragons. Yes, you read that right. :tuss:

Please tell me that they still play with the pedo even after he was kicked out of SA. :allears:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 12, 2014, 04:21:59 PM
I don't know they basically refer him as "that guy" and I don't have any overt proofs that they do. On one hand, I wouldn't be surprised but on the other they are so quick to turn on each others at the first sign of breaking rightthink rank that it might have turned into a competition to see who could rail on him the hardest and retcon 'Oh I always thought he was creepy' even if they spent hours every day chatting with him and sucking his dick for being a mod
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on January 12, 2014, 04:22:26 PM
I mean keep him mind that him, occupation, aatrek and other TV IV guys meet up on IRC friday nights to play a virtual game of dungeons and dragons. Yes, you read that right. :tuss:

Please tell me that they still play with the pedo even after he was kicked out of SA. :allears:

Come on, they really needed that Wizard with his staff of plus one child anal rape to fill out the party.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on January 12, 2014, 04:22:41 PM
"i'll conveniently forget you wanna fuck kids if you lend us your prowess with the sword for this dungeon run, sir knight"  :goonbeer:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on January 12, 2014, 04:25:39 PM
A truly authentic New York City experience is spending all day cooped up in your room, on the internet, defending people of color from racist TV watchers.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hyperbole on January 12, 2014, 04:29:50 PM
They got into a huge argument in the Doctor ho thread because a few posters were suggesting that the Doctor shouldn't regenerate into a woman.

Cue pages and pages of people accusing Rhyno of being sexist and backwards thinking, oh and a few red titles too!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: IHaveNoMouthAndIMustSteen on January 12, 2014, 04:56:41 PM

(http://i.imgur.com/6IXvC3i.jpg)

Do goons know you can have surgery to fix the fact that 85% of your smile is your fucking gums?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_lengthening
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Internet Catchphrase on January 12, 2014, 05:04:36 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/6IXvC3i.jpg)


REVERSE ENGINES! OH GOD I PASSED THE EVENT HORIZON!!!!! HELPPPPPPPMEEEEEEEE!!!

Where we're going, you won't want eyes to see.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on January 12, 2014, 05:13:38 PM
I really don't have the effort posting ability to say how much TVIV and CineD suck. The amount of subtext those broken tv addicts look for in the most simplest of media to fit their SJW worldview is pathetic. Nothing can ever be enjoyed as it is presented. Everything is racist, misogynist, classist or (blank)-phobic.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on January 12, 2014, 05:55:27 PM
They got into a huge argument in the Doctor ho thread because a few posters were suggesting that the Doctor shouldn't regenerate into a woman.

Cue pages and pages of people accusing Rhyno of being sexist and backwards thinking, oh and a few red titles too!

Here's an example from that thread today:
Quote from: Chairman Mao" post="424324763
Also I feel like Aldred being cool with it makes the whole "let's make Ace HOT!" thing a whole lot less creepy. I mean these are the NAs so I imagine some of you could dig up a passage or two to make me eat my fucking words but it just seems a whole lot less skeevy than sexualizing a character that bears her likeness without her knowledge or consent.

Context: he's talking about some tie in books that were written for the show 20 years ago when it was cancelled. They changed one of the characters on the show and continued her intended arc that had been planned by the writers and producers, which included having her grow up and become more of an adult. This included having sex and relationships. While this is debatably skeevy, "Chairman Mao"'s issue with this is that the ACTRESS might not have consented to the change of the character in books that were written 10 years after a role she had for 3 years ended. A character she didn't have the rights to in any way. :tuss: This is like saying the writers of the last 3 Bond flicks with Daniel Craig had no right to change anything about the characterization of James Bond without consulting Sean Connery.

There's posters in each thread who "mod" the thread and pile on to anyone who commits wrongthink. Not just SJW opinions but who has different opinions, good or bad about the show. A thread is either dedicated to "hatewatching" or sucking off the show, and if you differ from established opinion you will be mocked or ignored at best or driven out at worst. There's several threads I don't even read or post in of shows I do like because they are just so terrible.

Aatrek used to do this basically for the Star Trek thread, where there were only like 5 acceptable topics and certain opinions were Wrong. But even after he's gone this has just spread over a bunch of other threads by non-mods.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: jimbolio on January 12, 2014, 06:43:44 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/6IXvC3i.jpg)


REVERSE ENGINES! OH GOD I PASSED THE EVENT HORIZON!!!!! HELPPPPPPPMEEEEEEEE!!!

Where we're going, you won't want eyes to see.

Get a load of this fat sack of shit. There is not one hint of testosterone in his blood. No facial hair, no angle to the jaw, titties that trapped bitch is probably jealous of. He is so obese his face is flushed from high blood pressure just from sitting on his ass. Well done... Check out the finger fat between the knuckles. Damn.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on January 12, 2014, 07:09:57 PM
^^^^ lol, you're right, dude is so fat, his sausage fingers have extra knuckles
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Internet Catchphrase on January 12, 2014, 07:32:58 PM
He also has the beginning of clubbing on his finger tips which means heart trouble on the horizon at a very young age.

EDIT: or more likely its a visual trick from the death grip that poor girl is in.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on January 12, 2014, 08:08:11 PM
When someone refers to themselves as a bruiser, doesn't that imply that they might be able to beat some other person up? I guess he thinks aggressively SJW slapfighting people on a third-rate internet forum is kind of like beating someone up?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on January 12, 2014, 08:17:46 PM
Isn't that pancake goon?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on January 12, 2014, 08:59:49 PM
i have never heard of black people being compared to dogs

I'm from the S-S-S-South and I've never heard it either.

On the other hand, I have heard that bad, bad Leroy Brown (the baddest man in the whole damn town) is "badder than old King Kong" and "meaner than a junkyard dog" which sounds like dog whistle racism to me. :parsons:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: professional lurker on January 12, 2014, 09:59:19 PM
Junkyard Dog was a badass 80s wrestler of colour (WoC).
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: freak puke on January 12, 2014, 11:24:42 PM
The Adventure Time thread is great because it makes my creepy manchild obsession with the show look normal by comparison.

Quote from: Mage Ham
Quote from: MojoKingBee

    God I love Magic Man. He's a villain, but he's not really evil. He's just a huge rear end in a top hat.


This is, to me, what makes him that much more terrifying; he's a representation of banal evil.

Magic Man seems to be amoral, and not only exclusively works towards his own desires, he doesn't even percieve other people as having wants or desires; they're just objects for him to work his magic on.
This makes him a huge rear end in a top hat in the show, but if he were more of a 'big picture' thinker, he could easily be a genocidal madman or dictator. Magic Man is the banal, human evil that results from dehumanization.

The Lich, meanwhile, isn't all that scary (aside from Ron Perlman's silky tones) because he represents a completely understandable internal force, the drive toward death instead of life. He's something that we'd like to deny, but he's in all of us, we know him- and in most cases, it's easy to deny him, to not destroy yourself. The impulse toward life wins out.

The Magic Man, on the other hand, is also a tendency we all possess (self-absorption), but he's one that we don't have a strong motive to deny and may not even notice as it slowly drives us to greater and greater transgressions.
Scary.

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3565204&userid=164148
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Bitters on January 12, 2014, 11:26:42 PM
That's what I thought.
 (http://booru.ehkzai.com/index.php?q=/image/4539.PNG)

Isn't that pancake goon?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on January 12, 2014, 11:35:04 PM
tviv does suck.  i just checked the thread to see general concensus on wether community is worth watching this season, and one of the first posts i came across:

Quote from: Shakugan
Am I the only one who found this episode with it's treatment of the ass-crack bandit as analogous to sexual harassment to be really distasteful? I'm sure I'll get a bunch of people jumping on me for "not having a sense of humour", "community is a tv show", "parody", etc etc, but those are the kinds of responses that are typically involved with rape culture, so it's expected.

This is absolutely not meant to start a derail on rape culture in TV, I'm just curious to know if anyone else had similar thoughts (because literally every post since the episode aired by my count has been some variant of "wow, Community is back and awesome again!!!").

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3597051&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=24#post424250552 (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3597051&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=24#post424250552)

this in an episode about a college campus prankster who rolls coins down the cracks of unsuspecting peoples butts

shakugan has 12 pages of similarly terrible posts in the live forums
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Professor of Niggerology on January 12, 2014, 11:35:28 PM
I think the dumbest thing in the TVIV lately is everyone is obsessed with making characters gay.
Quote from: hope and vaseline" post="424139734
Pretty much how it happened with Scott and Allison in season one, too. They just need to make Scott/Isaac canon already because I mean come on, did you all not watch the first half of Season 3?
Keep in mind Scott is hung up on ladies but apparently he's a secret homo because....
Quote from: Pinterest Mom" post="424332167
Teen Wolf is basically Slash Dogwhistle, The Series. There's hints to justify nearly every pairing, but they're inaudible to everyone but fans of that pairing.


Given the way Isaac acts around Scott, it's not tremendously hard to imagine that he scribbles SCOTT x ISAAC in the margins of his notebooks or that he filled up about three pages of his diary the night he got to ride with Scott on his bike.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: freak puke on January 12, 2014, 11:53:47 PM
tviv does suck.  i just checked the thread to see general concensus on wether community is worth watching this season, and one of the first posts i came across:

Quote from: Shakugan
Am I the only one who found this episode with it's treatment of the ass-crack bandit as analogous to sexual harassment to be really distasteful? I'm sure I'll get a bunch of people jumping on me for "not having a sense of humour", "community is a tv show", "parody", etc etc, but those are the kinds of responses that are typically involved with rape culture, so it's expected.

This is absolutely not meant to start a derail on rape culture in TV, I'm just curious to know if anyone else had similar thoughts (because literally every post since the episode aired by my count has been some variant of "wow, Community is back and awesome again!!!").

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3597051&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=24#post424250552 (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3597051&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=24#post424250552)

this in an episode about a college campus prankster who rolls coins down the cracks of unsuspecting peoples butts

shakugan has 12 pages of similarly terrible posts in the live forums


The episode that parodied police procedurals by taking a dumb prank super seriously was in turn taken super seriously by some dork...

 :roddy:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on January 13, 2014, 12:12:18 AM
Rape culture is a phrase that needs to be stricken from the English language.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Morty Doom on January 13, 2014, 12:18:15 AM
All I can think of is getting talked down to by that doughy piece of shit for espousing non feminist approved opinions on my favorite tv show, then seeing a picture of who was talking down to me and putting a bullet in my head cause I got scolded by a marshmallow boy with a creepy tranny looking girlfriend who likely smells of old meat.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on January 13, 2014, 02:04:04 AM
^^^^ lol, you're right, dude is so fat, his sausage fingers have extra knuckles

How fucking fat and soft do you have to be to have sausage fingers with extra knuckles? I'm a big guy but I don't have fucking hands like a god damned cartoon.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 13, 2014, 02:10:44 AM
The last two pages of the Hobbit thread in CineD is infested with SJW's calling Tolkien/LOTR racist again.  :librage:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on January 13, 2014, 02:24:25 AM
The last two pages of the Hobbit thread in CineD is infested with SJW's calling Tolkien/LOTR racist again.  :librage:

Tolkien heard the "Rivers of Blood" speech in 1968 and completely re-wrote everything to cover everything up that he wrote in 1937-1949 before he died in 1973.

Fucking retarded goons being stupid as shit again I see.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 13, 2014, 03:39:36 AM
I swear goons just sit around and get triggered and defensive on behalf of sickly, make believe minorities who are cowered and weak in the corner, crippled by (what goons consider to be) racism and other social issues. The University I attend has a plaque in the building I frequent most that explicitly states that the founders endowment to the school was meant to create a learning institution for white boys and girls only. Turns out I don't collapse on the floor and literally shake over it. I fight that racism by getting an education there anyway,

which is more than what some beta white male goon who trembles and weeps "b-b-b-but a poc female, you should let me tell you how you should perceive feminism and racism because i know better than you"  :parsons: can do for me or the situation.

Tolkien is and always has been a favourite author of mine and his works are some of my favourites to read after all these years. Chances are the upper middle class English dude is going to be pretty fucking Eurocentric. Yes, many of his writings do away with the accusations but the point is that Tolkien never prefaced his works with "NIGGERS CAN'T READ THIS!!!!" and if he was a racist, well, negroes like your books too, so I win in the end. You can put your swords down now, o goony knights of valor.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Professor of Niggerology on January 13, 2014, 05:25:40 AM
I swear goons just sit around and get triggered and defensive on behalf of sickly, make believe minorities who are cowered and weak in the corner, crippled by (what goons consider to be) racism and other social issues. The University I attend has a plaque in the building I frequent most that explicitly states that the founders endowment to the school was meant to create a learning institution for white boys and girls only. Turns out I don't collapse on the floor and literally shake over it. I fight that racism by getting an education there anyway,

which is more than what some beta white male goon who trembles and weeps "b-b-b-but a poc female, you should let me tell you how you should perceive feminism and racism because i know better than you"  :parsons: can do for me or the situation.

Tolkien is and always has been a favourite author of mine and his works are some of my favourites to read after all these years. Chances are the upper middle class English dude is going to be pretty fucking Eurocentric. Yes, many of his writings do away with the accusations but the point is that Tolkien never prefaced his works with "NIGGERS CAN'T READ THIS!!!!" and if he was a racist, well, negroes like your books too, so I win in the end. You can put your swords down now, o goony knights of valor.
let me explain internalized racism to you :parsons:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on January 13, 2014, 05:38:08 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/6IXvC3i.jpg)

Holy lol, thank for this. BB is the absolute fucking worst in EVERYTHING and turns out he's a fat shapeless blob?

 :nixon: :nixon: :nixon: :nixon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Rapper on January 13, 2014, 09:53:32 AM
tviv does suck.  i just checked the thread to see general concensus on wether community is worth watching this season, and one of the first posts i came across:

Quote from: Shakugan
Am I the only one who found this episode with it's treatment of the ass-crack bandit as analogous to sexual harassment to be really distasteful? I'm sure I'll get a bunch of people jumping on me for "not having a sense of humour", "community is a tv show", "parody", etc etc, but those are the kinds of responses that are typically involved with rape culture, so it's expected.

This is absolutely not meant to start a derail on rape culture in TV, I'm just curious to know if anyone else had similar thoughts (because literally every post since the episode aired by my count has been some variant of "wow, Community is back and awesome again!!!").

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3597051&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=24#post424250552 (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3597051&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=24#post424250552)

this in an episode about a college campus prankster who rolls coins down the cracks of unsuspecting peoples butts

shakugan has 12 pages of similarly terrible posts in the live forums


The episode that parodied police procedurals by taking a dumb prank super seriously was in turn taken super seriously by some dork...

 :roddy:

Every single other character in the show even made fun of them for taking it so seriously. The entire premise was that they only investigated it so they could spend time alone and that one of them is likely the actual bandit.

Also the actor who played the "super PTSD victim in a wheelchair" is a rapper who IRL raps about slapping booties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Glover



We have come full circle through the looking glass. Mainstream media is making fun of the SJWs trivial issues and this new emotion other humans know as "humor" is TRIGGERING THEM.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Coyote Attic on January 13, 2014, 12:25:05 PM
step aside posted BrooklynBruiser's picture in the PYF Awkward, Ugly and Gross thread.  :twisted:

And poster A Fancy 400 lbs think they may know the girl:

Quote
I'm like 99% sure I know the chick, she's one of the most batshit insane people I've ever met if it's her, and the dude's awkward is most likely nothing compared to her.

EDIT: For an example she was once convinced her (now ex-)boyfriend was a Mayan god who was sent to earth to lead her through xibalba.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 12:33:01 PM
link that shit, son!

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3551012&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=467#post424358615

better doing it myself. and he DOES look like a muppet
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on January 13, 2014, 12:43:42 PM
I think the dumbest thing in the TVIV lately is everyone is obsessed with making characters gay.

It seems like the internet in general is obsessed with making TV characters gay. Including cartoon characters.

Are two characters close friends? Must be gay. Do they treat each other like siblings? Gay. Are they actually, literally siblings? Totally gay.

Edit: Are they rivals? They must want to have sex with each other. Enemies? Big time gaywads. Do they hate each other's guts? That's just hidden gay passion.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Rapper on January 13, 2014, 01:05:22 PM
I think the dumbest thing in the TVIV lately is everyone is obsessed with making characters gay.

It seems like the internet in general is obsessed with making TV characters gay. Including cartoon characters.

Are two characters close friends? Must be gay. Do they treat each other like siblings? Gay. Are they actually, literally siblings? Totally gay.

Edit: Are they rivals? They must want to have sex with each other. Enemies? Big time gaywads. Do they hate each other's guts? That's just hidden gay passion.

There is already so many more gay characters on TV compared to reality. If television writing was real there would only be a 4-5% chance the character was gay openly or otherwise. These people want the world to be portrayed in a way that is much more gay than reality. They want every strong male lead to "strongly consider" becoming gay. This ties in with attacking masculinity as "toxic".


"Real men are gay!"
-MSM
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 01:28:18 PM
see that's the reason why this thread exists:

Quote from: Cactus
I have to admit, despite the fact that I want to be a good, progressive person, despite the fact that I'm aware of the concept of privilege and that I have it because by chance I was born a straight white male, despite the fact that I know I'll never truly fathom what life is like without that privilege and despite the fact that I'd love society to be a better place without these issues, even though I knew Skyler was being completely reasonable and acting in a way I would probably act if in her shoes, a part of me still loving cheered and fist-pumped when Walt asked Skyler to climb down out of his ass.

 We're a product of our society, which, despite what the MRAs would have us believe, is a largely patriarchal one. That isn't any one individual's fault, and however aware we are of it, it is so ingrained that we sometimes can't escape it. I think a lot of people get defensive about this stuff because they perceive people pointing this sort of stuff out as a personal attack (and sometimes it is) but I think most people that draw attention to it, at least around here I hope, are in fact just trying to raise awareness and have intelligent discussions (like I perceive Sophia to be doing).

Let's do a thought experiment. I know this is a movie and not a TV show, but lets take the ultimate deadbeat comedic character. Hypothetically if Jeff Lebowski's character had been written, all else remaining the same, as a female character, what do people guess the reception would have been? What would the nickname "The Dude" have been replaced with? Would it have been seen as being as funny? As critically acclaimed? As embraced as a cult classic? Does anyone here think they personally would have liked it more or less, if being completely honest with themselves (not asking anyone to post the answer here if they don't like the honest answer, just think about it), or would it have made no difference? Assume for the thought experiment that the actress chosen to play... Jane Lebowski was just as good at comedic acting as Jeff Bridges.

I personally think the reviews we'd have read of the Big Lebowski would have been very different. If I'm brutally honest with myself, those reviews either would have coloured my perception of the film, or my inherent sexism might have done that all by itself (I was much younger back then, and I definitely had some very questionable outlooks on life) and I probably wouldn't have liked it as much. I believe this is what's happening with Girls, but of course that is an impossible claim to verify or prove in any way without access to multiple universes.

This is a forum where we casually discuss stuff we watch on TV. It isn't D&D. Say for example if someone had said something like "in New Girl, I think Schmidt was generally disliked at first, but people seem to have since warmed to the character, despite him still being a massive dickhead at times". Most would probably voice agreement. One or two might have said they still dislike him as much now as they did back then. Some might even make the claim that the character is sexist. But would anyone have asked for specific citations from various critics? I very much doubt it. So why this higher standard with Girls?

:lilal:

Quote from: Android Blues
Quote from: EvilTobaccoExec
Also not really related at all.. more a random thought I had, but I bet for every major horror movie you could find both journal articles calling out misogynistic themes and articles hailing feminist themes. There's just so much history with both representations and loaded imagery that a lot of arguments can be paint-by-numbers applied even. This is totally unrelated to anything. Probably shouldn't have this paragraph. Eh.

Speaking as someone who's researched and written on this in academia, while feminism in horror movies is a pretty rich field, they're generally a deeply problematic genre and pretty much every major piece of writing on them doesn't discuss them as feminist works but as compromised ones with a mixture of misogynist and feminist elements.

A theorist writing on a horror movie about witches, to use a simple example, might analyse how the movie simultaneously portrays female power, and presents it as outside the realm of the safe, normal or licit. Horror is essentially about outsider power, which is potentially feminist, but it's also about how that outsider power threatens the status quo, which is a much more complicated proposition.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: muslim batman on January 13, 2014, 01:45:30 PM
The reason why people would hate that a woman portrayed as a lazy deadbeat is because they hate women?
 :jesse:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on January 13, 2014, 01:56:47 PM
What kind of non goon would want to watch a movie that's about an overweight and unlikable cat lady suffering from fibro?

Allof that goons self flagellation over not meeting up to progressive standards and privilege checking has more in common with dark age era Christianity than any ideology today.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 13, 2014, 02:20:15 PM
If Jeff Lebowski had been Jane Lebowski the only difference is that you would see a tiny subculture of trashy stoner college-aged women idolizing her as a role model because man, the dude chick abides, maaaaan *puff*

I think the dumbest thing in the TVIV lately is everyone is obsessed with making characters gay.

It seems like the internet in general is obsessed with making TV characters gay. Including cartoon characters.

Are two characters close friends? Must be gay. Do they treat each other like siblings? Gay. Are they actually, literally siblings? Totally gay.

Edit: Are they rivals? They must want to have sex with each other. Enemies? Big time gaywads. Do they hate each other's guts? That's just hidden gay passion.

Men really want to see hot actresses naked, and ideally making out with each other. Women really want to see hot actors making out with each other, and ideally naked.

Nothing wrong with that, it's just the nature of the sexes.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on January 13, 2014, 02:49:06 PM
Hbomberguy would make for a good doxx. Post history shows activity in the threads: Kevin Smith Discussion, Star Wars, Dark Souls, Feminism/GenderEQ, and Let's Play.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on January 13, 2014, 03:12:39 PM
Quote from: Jonny Angel
Finally caught up on Season 4 and S5E1. While S4 owned as usual, almost everything involving Jody Adair left a bad taste in my mouth. His first episode was the premiere, so maybe Fletcher Nix from Season 3 had left me with an unreasonable standard. But I kinda liked what he seemed to have going on in that episode, a slightly sympathetic guy who ultimately was too good at rationalizing his misdeeds. (Was a little awkward though of have a white Southern guy in a suit lecturing a black guy on how he had "no self-awareness")

Quote
Oh, I agree. It's a completely accurate read on Jody, and the "If you meet assholes all day, you're the asshole" line sums him up really well too. Plus, in the context of the show Raylan's proven repeatedly that he's not at all a racist guy (though Rachel called him out once or twice on being able to get away with shit that she never would, for example). It just felt a little uneasy, like somewhere some dudes in wifebeaters were watching and nodding along, all "Just like my life!"

Apologies if this is nearing a social justice derail. I'm happy to shut up about it if we feel like productive things won't come of this.

Quote from: Midnight City
It's a valid observation, wasn't deriding you for it. I was born in Kentucky and it definitely has some weird form of concentrated racism that's completely different from even other southern states like Arkansas, where I live now. I think it's largely due to the demographics, the town I live in now in southern Arkansas is 45% black, the town next to me is 48%, I think most towns in Kentucky (Harlan included) don't even reach double digits, so change is a hell of a lot slower (if at all).

autistic faggots
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on January 13, 2014, 03:31:35 PM
the brooklynbruiser pic got removed from imgur, what is it brooklynbruiser, something sensitive.com?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 03:35:11 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/Ps7swaj.jpg)

gapo make it an emote

you can't destroy our freedom, fatty. it's not a large pizza.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on January 13, 2014, 04:12:43 PM
prob broke out skillet and bribed imgur staff with pancakes
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on January 13, 2014, 04:35:05 PM
What's going on with his head anyway? What's with the 2/3 blushing thing?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: themanhimself on January 13, 2014, 04:38:15 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/g7YgYr9.png?1)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 13, 2014, 04:43:02 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/Ps7swaj.jpg)

you can't destroy our freedom, fatty. it's not a large pizza.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: themanhimself on January 13, 2014, 04:48:42 PM
more beet red

(http://i.imgur.com/bcjaH1P.png?1)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on January 13, 2014, 04:51:31 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/Ps7swaj.jpg)

you can't destroy our freedom, fatty. it's not a large pizza.

lol at the reverse-hoverhand
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on January 13, 2014, 05:05:09 PM
more beet red

(http://i.imgur.com/bcjaH1P.png?1)
black and white, but a red ginger face?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on January 13, 2014, 05:29:54 PM
This is definitely representative of an SJW internet toughguy
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on January 13, 2014, 05:48:32 PM
It looks like their heads are attached in the cropped image...it could use some editing I think.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on January 13, 2014, 05:56:47 PM
It looks like their heads are attached in the cropped image...it could use some editing I think.

I like that part
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on January 13, 2014, 06:08:25 PM
Since BrooklynBruiser wants his pic removed from the internet, we are going to immortalize him as a smiley. See the poll up top. What should his smiley signify?

:tviv:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on January 13, 2014, 06:29:14 PM
Step Aside put that shit back up in thread. :nixon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 06:46:19 PM
vote goes for :goonlove:

also back in pyf http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3551012&pagenumber=469#post424397855
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on January 13, 2014, 06:59:08 PM
What's going on with his head anyway? What's with the 2/3 blushing thing?

hypertension/having pork gravy for blood
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on January 13, 2014, 08:01:32 PM
if you want different BBruisers, there are loads (see whut i did thar?)

(http://i.imgur.com/LIA1mHE.jpg)  (wtf?  is he 12? his face is almost a perfect oval)

(http://i.imgur.com/TQwiDsQ.jpg)  (this one is particularly disgusting, but the resolution sucks so it may be no good)

(http://i.imgur.com/9t1ElIP.jpg)  (oh noes!  posing with that hate-monger stephen fry?)

(http://i.imgur.com/owrBGF9.jpg) (#1: why is he wearing those headphones?  #2: he looks as if gravitational collapse is about to take over and form the BrooklynBlackHole, #3: loving those foster grant's, fatty)

edit: that bottom one is just nasty.  he's so fat, the other guy can't get his arm around him, and look at the fatty fatfatfat knuckles.  holy shit, the local deli could carve him thin and make him last for a year.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 08:04:03 PM
post everything you got itt thanks if you got links and shit pm me
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on January 13, 2014, 08:08:03 PM
post everything you got itt thanks if you got links and shit pm me

sorry boss, nothing special.  these were in the "post your picture" in pyf and BB was already on the radar as "contemptible faggot of the year" candidate.  i didn't do much digging tho.

you know, it wouldn't surprise me if  he's gone and deleted those images...
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 08:42:22 PM
Conquistador
(http://i.imgur.com/PyLUZQS.jpg)

Now I could wax poetics about that smarmy cunt, but the fact is that he defended Aatrek vehemently after it turned out he raped a child.
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3572673&userid=142199&perpage=40&pagenumber=4
Quote from: Conquistador
Well, I'll throw my support in for Aatrek. It didn't take much internetting to figure out what was going on behind all this. I think you should still post here, and that people should remember that internet detectives are banned from SA for a reason thanks.
Quote from: Conquistador
You obviously don't follow my posting if you think I'm going to back down from that remark.
Quote from: Conquistador
E: Also, is that what is happening right now? This is some stupid rear end forum invasion poo poo?
Quote from: Conquistador
So basically thats the end of Trek thread

gently caress
Quote from: Conquistador
Also, it seems like whatever went down happened when the dude was like 14 or some poo poo. As far as I know he's almost 40 now, so yeah, I think it's kind of bullshit to gently caress his life up over something that happened when he was a kid.

He was probated after everyone turned on him. He backed away from what he said... then started making jokes about that little girl getting raped.
Quote from: Conquistador
He was only trying to sap her essence to remain young
Quote from: Conquistador
Quote from: Boxturret
I never really cared for DS9.

literally the worst thing posted in this thread today
Quote from: Conquistador
The sad part is I don't even like Aatrek

E: I don't didn't actively dislike him either, I just generally take internet detective poo poo with a grain of salt and generally dont like it.

Then he admitted to it and I saw all the other poo poo and welp,

He also made jokes about himself being a pedo out of the blue in unrelated threads before.

And that's what he looks like:
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2709557&userid=142199
(http://i.imgur.com/1JEIIBA.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/uNhrcV9.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/PvvoCrK.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/I5jZ5Mp.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/vUNl53o.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/vRj6tzd.jpg)

he also posted all that shit willingly :tuss:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 08:49:09 PM
presenting the newest smiley, :goonlove :

:goonlove:

mouseover text: 'when two become one blob'

:stewart:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 13, 2014, 09:42:08 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/PvvoCrK.png)

ask me about losing my virginity to a hooker my dad got me for my 13th birthday
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on January 13, 2014, 09:50:05 PM
if you want different BBruisers, there are loads (see whut i did thar?)

(wtf?  is he 12? his face is almost a perfect oval)

(http://i.imgur.com/TQwiDsQ.jpg)

He really does look like a child, in this one especially. Like a fat, dorky 12 year old wandered into a bar and took a selfie with a tiny gay man doing terrible Frank Zappa cosplay.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 09:54:16 PM
They are cosplaying as brothers Groucho and Zeppelin Marx.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on January 13, 2014, 10:11:48 PM
From the Look at These Fucking Goons thread:

(http://i.imgur.com/KEtHAoF.jpg)

Pretty sure that's an older pic of BrooklynBruiser
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on January 13, 2014, 10:17:12 PM
From the Look at These Fucking Goons thread:

(http://i.imgur.com/KEtHAoF.jpg)

Pretty sure that's an older pic of BrooklynBruiser

 :stonk:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Renegade Jew on January 13, 2014, 10:21:03 PM
Conquistador looks like he desperately wants to daterape someone, and BrooklynBruisedBruiser thinks a block of cheese is a hat.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 10:23:26 PM
Conquistador looks like he desperately wants to daterape someone, and BrooklynBruisedBruiser thinks a block of cheese is a hat.

 :facepalm:

he cannot possibly think the block of cheese is real.

he's not eating it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 14, 2014, 12:09:20 AM
Yo, how is Conquistador a faggot again? Because he looks like a fairly normal dude, taking wacky pictures with friends and going out and doing real world shit. He has a chin, and looks like he might use a gym's equipment instead of just walking the door, walking out and saying "went to the gym, time to have another cheetos sundae as a reward"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on January 14, 2014, 12:15:16 AM
Yo, how is Conquistador a faggot again? Because he looks like a fairly normal dude, taking wacky pictures with friends and going out and doing real world shit. He has a chin, and looks like he might use a gym's equipment instead of just walking the door, walking out and saying "went to the gym, time to have another cheetos sundae as a reward"

Mostly just the whole 'defending Aatrek for the wacky lulz' gimmick he has right now, and when you're even just ironically defending a child rapist you're still probably some variety of faggot. And he was still doing it since December, last I saw.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 14, 2014, 12:20:16 AM
Yo, how is Conquistador a faggot again? Because he looks like a fairly normal dude, taking wacky pictures with friends and going out and doing real world shit. He has a chin, and looks like he might use a gym's equipment instead of just walking the door, walking out and saying "went to the gym, time to have another cheetos sundae as a reward"

He looks normal compared to most goons (When he wants to I guess) but he's an obnoxious faggot with every post he makes. Also the defending Aatrek thing.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on January 14, 2014, 12:21:44 AM
Yo, how is Conquistador a faggot again? Because he looks like a fairly normal dude, taking wacky pictures with friends and going out and doing real world shit. He has a chin, and looks like he might use a gym's equipment instead of just walking the door, walking out and saying "went to the gym, time to have another cheetos sundae as a reward"

the part about him defending aatrek, despite everyone else walking away/running for cover.  he defended it with "i read the doxx lol sass".  then he defended it with "i read the doxx lol  i can't google 'aaron nadler' to verify".   finally it was "i read the doxx, it sucks there won't be any more star trek threads run by a huge pedantic douchebag/ pedophile"

but then a simple look at conquistador's post history is "wacky zany contrarian who'll do anything for more attention"

i think it's any/all of that
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Concerned Pyschologist on January 14, 2014, 12:31:48 AM
see that's the reason why this thread exists:



Android Blues. Fuck, I remember that idiot starting a debate over rape in the Dominic Deegan mock thread.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on January 14, 2014, 06:18:59 AM
Yo, how is Conquistador a faggot again? Because he looks like a fairly normal dude, taking wacky pictures with friends and going out and doing real world shit. He has a chin, and looks like he might use a gym's equipment instead of just walking the door, walking out and saying "went to the gym, time to have another cheetos sundae as a reward"

Guys changing facial hair/hairstyles more often than they change their undershorts is as reliable a nutcase indicator in guys as crazy eyes/"I was so abused as a child" is in a chick.  Whether a cry for attention or an attempt to avoid potential APBs, it's not an indicator of good mental stability.

Also taking pictures of going out drinking with your dad (when dad looks mildly unsettled by it as well)?!?  I doubt he's got (m)any normal friends if that's the drinking picture he posts.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: FALSE FLAG POSTING EVENT on January 14, 2014, 07:04:33 AM
Is Brooklyn Bruiser that goon sitting on the carpet staring longingly at the girl who is rolling her eyes? And there's a cheese plate on the ground.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 14, 2014, 08:42:29 AM
Oh right, that's where I heard that faggot's name. Yeah, all is faggot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on January 14, 2014, 10:52:25 AM
Yo, how is Conquistador a faggot again? Because he looks like a fairly normal dude, taking wacky pictures with friends and going out and doing real world shit. He has a chin, and looks like he might use a gym's equipment instead of just walking the door, walking out and saying "went to the gym, time to have another cheetos sundae as a reward"

the part about him defending aatrek, despite everyone else walking away/running for cover.  he defended it with "i read the doxx lol sass".  then he defended it with "i read the doxx lol  i can't google 'aaron nadler' to verify".   finally it was "i read the doxx, it sucks there won't be any more star trek threads run by a huge pedantic douchebag/ pedophile"

but then a simple look at conquistador's post history is "wacky zany contrarian who'll do anything for more attention"

i think it's any/all of that

After AAtrek he posted a wimpy puss out apology in the star trek thread asking to be able to post again, this is before he took it all back in his attempts to be a gbs superstar

You all also forgot to post the picture with his forums name tattooed on his back because a goon told him to.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on January 14, 2014, 12:22:28 PM
Guys changing facial hair/hairstyles more often than they change their undershorts is as reliable a nutcase indicator in guys as crazy eyes/"I was so abused as a child" is in a chick.  Whether a cry for attention or an attempt to avoid potential APBs, it's not an indicator of good mental stability.

Changing your hair style a lot is a sign of insanity? Get to fuck, you goony cunt. Go outside.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 14, 2014, 01:06:41 PM
You all also forgot to post the picture with his forums name tattooed on his back because a goon told him to.

Eh, to be fair Conquistador is a legit word, and if it wasn't because it was his internet name it could be kind of badass. Its not like getting WEEDLORD BONERHITLER or Transaction or some megagoony internet meme.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: LITERALLY A RAPIST on January 14, 2014, 01:14:59 PM
You all also forgot to post the picture with his forums name tattooed on his back because a goon told him to.

Eh, to be fair Conquistador is a legit word, and if it wasn't because it was his internet name it could be kind of badass. Its not like getting WEEDLORD BONERHITLER or Transaction or some megagoony internet meme.

fun fact: the reason why conquistadors were so successful was because a lot of the tribes hated the oppressive empires (aztec, incan) and helped overthrow them. 200 spaniards didn't just wash up in unfamiliar territory with steel swords and suppress hundreds of thousands of people with white privilege; they worked with local tribes who were fed up with having to hand over a number of people a day for human sacrifice. i'm shocked that a goon would tattoo themselves with that tbh.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 14, 2014, 01:46:28 PM
You all also forgot to post the picture with his forums name tattooed on his back because a goon told him to.

Eh, to be fair Conquistador is a legit word, and if it wasn't because it was his internet name it could be kind of badass. Its not like getting WEEDLORD BONERHITLER or Transaction or some megagoony internet meme.

fun fact: the reason why conquistadors were so successful was because a lot of the tribes hated the oppressive empires (aztec, incan) and helped overthrow them. 200 spaniards didn't just wash up in unfamiliar territory with steel swords and suppress hundreds of thousands of people with white privilege; they worked with local tribes who were fed up with having to hand over a number of people a day for human sacrifice. i'm shocked that a goon would tattoo themselves with that tbh.

mostdef, but these dudes were also hardened combat Veterans with advanced weapons a few centuries ahead of their Bats with nails bits of glass stuck in them. They had a lot of experience killing brown people (Moors). So its not like 200 pasty goons washed up and completed a diplomatic victory.

But yes, its odd for a goon to have that tattooed and part of the reason I think its less faggy that he did it, probably because he can't be a total fag if he's identifying as one of the foot soldiers of brown people oppression.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on January 14, 2014, 01:47:03 PM
If there's a mini-doxx of Rarity since it's active in TVIV, just a reminder that it's a tranny sex-worker unironic brony who offers sex work to UK goons on IRC evidently

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?noseen=0&threadid=3390168&perpage=40&pagenumber=250#post424429515
^ Unironic brony

There's pics of it in the troon and Look at these fucking Goons threads already
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on January 14, 2014, 02:14:46 PM
Where's the irc evidence

and don't give credence to the sjw phrase "sex work" please
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 14, 2014, 04:08:34 PM
Rarity

Rarity is the queen bee of TVIV. Of course, he's a troon. Did you really expect something other than troons and ugly catladies (we're gonna do Sophia later)? In the proud troon tradition, he's also a stripper and a whore, I'm sorry I mean exotic dancer and escort. He's a totally legit sex worker no kinkshaming it's a respectable profession.

He's also a brony who somehow thinks that loving a gay show about horses catered to 8 year old girls is better than gay japanese shows catering to 12 year old boys
Quote from: Rarity
Get this anime out of my discussion thread, stop interrupting the buyrates chat.
Quote from: Rarity
There really needs to be a word for girl bronies.
It's funny how on SA most of the shrill 'WE NEED A LADIES [something]' are almost always troons

He constantly shits up SAS and other subforums, especially anything related to MMA (when troons are involved) or wrestling. No subject is safe from SJW bullshit one-liners:
Quote from: Rarity
Tell me more about your activist stance on men's rights :allears:
Quote from: Rarity
Truly, it is terrible the plight of the white American male :smith: 
the last one is pretty rich considering he's a white English man

Since he's a tranny and that makes him totes not a guy but totes a girl~ he gets to talk about how women look ugly without repercussions from the rightthinker of TVIV
Quote from: Rarity
This is my only issue with the show this year. She doesn't even look like she's human any more and it's all cause she's wearing enough makeup for three strippers.
He knows about fashion
Quote from: Rarity
Quote from: Atticus Finch
You trust the fashion threads in W&W?

The male threads are full of posing hipster douchebags. The female threads are full of awesome girls with great taste.
:tuss:

He also gets away with being an unironic brony due to having his dick cut off.
Quote from: Rarity
Honestly, while I think bemusement is a perfectly valid response and not everyone is gonna fall in love with the show, I don't see why people who react that way are posting here. At the first the trolling was funny but it's just got boring now. Especially when most trolls are labouring under a girls-don't-exist-on-the-internet illusion.
A guy who chopped off his dick insulted people think he's not a girl

he also loves to post in girly YLLS threads with the most annoying bullshit. also of course he loves to talk about his disgusting body and his career as a stripper.
Quote from: Rarity
Thanks for the advice! I'm an experienced pole dancer so I'm hoping that will mean I've got a headstart on the weights I'm lifting
Quote from: Rarity
Word to that. Getting your legs behind your head is a great party trick
Quote from: Rarity
I've just finished the weight free squat/crunch challenge I was doing (which is awesome coz 250 squats is way too many and I'm getting bored) so it's time to sign up to a gym and get a lifting program going. I was thinking about doing Starting Strength as detailed in that thread but I showed it to my friend and she said I could drop bench press because as a lady I don't need to work on my chest. She's super knowledgeable about fitness so now I'm all confused. Can you ladies confirm if this is a good/bad idea? I have no clue what's good and what isn't and I need a clear schedule of lifts or I know I won't commit to working out.
LADIES LADIES LADIES tell me how to work out as a LADY because my LADY FRIEND said us LADIES don't need to do chest work for our LADY CHESTS
Quote from: Rarity
Her issue is that it will risk messing up my breast implants, and from what I'm reading online now it does sound like a risk. I have a weird chest anyway so I don't want to do anything that could make them look even weirder.
Yeah, it might mess with your breast implants because men aren't supposed to shoot up estrogen and get fake breasts. just sayin.
Quote from: Rarity
I just did my first ever conventional deadlift today! Promptly followed by my new trainer telling me I'm way too tall to do them and to shift to sumo deadlifts instead. But I've officially started lifting, yay!
That's paid gym trainer for "Bro,  you're a guy, wtf bro? Don't do that girly shit"
Quote from: Rarity
Quote from: hollylolly
How tall are you?
6'1
:stare:

Truth is I can't even be bothered to go through the Glee or Game of Thrones or any of the other shit shows he's into. It's just so fucking annoying and full of pontificating, gay shit and ponies.

Now, the truly horrible part: pictures.
(http://i.imgur.com/1E62bqi.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/u5gpidf.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/W5pSqWm.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/spQAlrn.jpg?1)

only one fitting conclusion to this profile:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTs_TZFjbJ8
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on January 14, 2014, 04:16:09 PM
Conquistador looks like he desperately wants to daterape someone, and BrooklynBruisedBruiser thinks a block of cheese is a hat.

 :facepalm:

he cannot possibly think the block of cheese is real.

he's not eating it.
It's one of those novelty Wisconsin cheese hats:

http://www.packersproshop.com/Green-Bay-Packers-Collectibles/Novelties/sku-0903090001/
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 14, 2014, 04:37:53 PM
Thanks to an anymous tipster
(http://i.imgur.com/Zv4Bi2U.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/lNAtCSu.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/d8UEuIa.jpg)

also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on January 14, 2014, 04:40:56 PM
I ain't clicking that link
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on January 14, 2014, 04:41:26 PM
Thanks to an anymous tipster
(http://i.imgur.com/Zv4Bi2U.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/lNAtCSu.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/d8UEuIa.jpg)

also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

What the fuck man!

Those have to be the worst fake tits ever.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB_jvznaNM

Mournful Tits.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on January 14, 2014, 04:55:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLvBul5h7Vk

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on January 14, 2014, 04:56:58 PM
Rarity

(http://i.imgur.com/1E62bqi.jpg)

Why the long face?

Here's a clip of him talking: http://tindeck.com/listen/mafl

Nothing earth shatteringly bad but there you go
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 14, 2014, 05:00:40 PM
Also got sent this hilarious quote from Brooklyn Bruiser from a lurker:

<BrooklynBruiser> so i opened my tv and it was Chris Christie
<BrooklynBruiser> NOT COOL, TV

Apparently he thought the tv turned into a mirror for a second
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on January 14, 2014, 05:04:44 PM
I mean keep him mind that him, occupation, aatrek and other TV IV guys meet up on IRC friday nights to play a virtual game of dungeons and dragons. Yes, you read that right. :tuss:

Also I'm 99% sure this is bullshit, since BB and occupation fucking hate each other.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 14, 2014, 05:10:40 PM
yeah I think that might have been senerio and not bb

all I remember his occ, dp and some other faggots planning their irc KOBOLD games for friday nights
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on January 14, 2014, 05:10:47 PM
I username searched on my little pony goon offsite mlponies.com and rarity is a member on there. Don't know if there are any hilarious posts. There are, however a long feminism and troon threads. I don't have the time to go through them but I bet there's gold, there's more trans there than a vietnamese phonebook
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 14, 2014, 05:12:18 PM
i thought their mlp goon offsite was roundstable.com

shit i need to go through those then


mlponies redirects there yeah. their feminism thread is so fucking terrible and yeah maybe I should quote some of it here
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 14, 2014, 05:19:17 PM
there's more trans there than a vietnamese phonebook

lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 14, 2014, 05:54:56 PM
Thanks to an anymous tipster
(http://i.imgur.com/Zv4Bi2U.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/lNAtCSu.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/d8UEuIa.jpg)

also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

HOLY.
FUCKING.
SHIT.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on January 14, 2014, 06:01:41 PM
Thanks to an anymous tipster
(http://i.imgur.com/Zv4Bi2U.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/lNAtCSu.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/d8UEuIa.jpg)

also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

HOLY.
FUCKING.
SHIT.


ya these were floating around #wh2k for a while, also where the whoring itself to tviv/male goons shit came from
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ozmas Eggplant on January 14, 2014, 06:14:14 PM
I feel fucking nauseous holy shit
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on January 14, 2014, 08:07:36 PM


also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

What the fuck man!


mommy, why are its tits staring at the ceiling?

Quote
Those have to be the worst fake tits ever.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB_jvznaNM

Mournful Tits.

always gets a +1
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: I fucking hate goons on January 14, 2014, 08:44:16 PM
I think the dumbest thing in the TVIV lately is everyone is obsessed with making characters gay.

It seems like the internet in general is obsessed with making TV characters gay. Including cartoon characters.

Are two characters close friends? Must be gay. Do they treat each other like siblings? Gay. Are they actually, literally siblings? Totally gay.

Edit: Are they rivals? They must want to have sex with each other. Enemies? Big time gaywads. Do they hate each other's guts? That's just hidden gay passion.

The worst was SAS and TFF when the Manti Teo girlfriend shit came out. They desperately wanted him to be gay. It was frightening, really.

SAS in general fits in this thread. I used to post there a lot but I just fucking can't anymore. Everything, EVERYTHING, devolves into RACISM!!!!! and I WANT A GAY FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!!!!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: OSI on January 14, 2014, 09:10:00 PM
why the fuck did I click that link

:myecred2:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 14, 2014, 10:13:43 PM

I think the dumbest thing in the TVIV lately is everyone is obsessed with making characters gay.

It seems like the internet in general is obsessed with making TV characters gay. Including cartoon characters.

Are two characters close friends? Must be gay. Do they treat each other like siblings? Gay. Are they actually, literally siblings? Totally gay.

Edit: Are they rivals? They must want to have sex with each other. Enemies? Big time gaywads. Do they hate each other's guts? That's just hidden gay passion.

The worst had to be how goons were so adamant that Gustavo Fring was gay. These were the same people calling Skyler haters misogynists. Reading the BB threads were fucking unbearable. Sad, because it really was a good show.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: sub-base turf sniffing boner diarist on January 14, 2014, 10:18:49 PM
there's more trans there than a vietnamese phonebook

:jc:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on January 14, 2014, 11:04:05 PM
please stop posting/quoting those pictures tia
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Din Do Nuffins on January 14, 2014, 11:23:58 PM
SAS in general fits in this thread. I used to post there a lot but I just fucking can't anymore. Everything, EVERYTHING, devolves into RACISM!!!!!

I used to follow the baseball threads pretty closely but Mornacale made them unbearable. He manages to be a bigger faggot than Hand Knit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 14, 2014, 11:58:06 PM
How much could that thing even reasonably charge for the most unbearably long quickie you'll ever had? A thruppence? A farthing?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on January 15, 2014, 12:05:48 AM
How much could that thing even reasonably charge for the most unbearably long quickie you'll ever had? A thruppence? A farthing?

I dunno but here it is at work

(http://i.imgur.com/w2DVOGX.jpg)

@Raritysa 22 Dec 12
Me at work last night #HotAsFuck #IfICanSaySoMyself http://twitpic.com/bo86oo
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 15, 2014, 12:10:45 AM
yeah this is most definitely a strip-club's dressing room.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 15, 2014, 12:12:33 AM
groce groce groce groce groce
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 15, 2014, 12:15:21 AM
yeah this is most definitely a strip-club's dressing room.

Surely you mean circus side-show.



"AAAaaaandd now, ladies and gentlemen.... theeee amAAAAAzing BRITISH CATAMITE and his SKYWARD NIPPLES"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ozmas Eggplant on January 15, 2014, 12:17:50 AM
The worst was SAS and TFF when the Manti Teo girlfriend shit came out. They desperately wanted him to be gay. It was frightening, really.

SAS in general fits in this thread. I used to post there a lot but I just fucking can't anymore. Everything, EVERYTHING, devolves into RACISM!!!!! and I WANT A GAY FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!!!!

They try to make every single fucking issue about race or some other social issue and it's fucking insane and most of them don't even seem like they like sports they just watch them and bitch about them. Football forum is awful but the baseball thread has been unreadable for years.

One of the guys in the baseball thread a while ago talked about how it was his moral duty to call out people using bad words on the forums and twitter. His name was like A Damn Fog or something.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on January 15, 2014, 12:20:46 AM
yeah this is most definitely a strip-club's dressing room.

Quote
@Raritysa 17 Dec
Ughhh was working and just started a show with a guy when he told me he was 17. Now I feel gross :(
So it shows off its fucked up titties to minors, plus imagine how he felt when he saw your busted titties and troongina

Quote
@Raritysa 16 Dec
The girl I like invited me to a movie on Weds and I think would be just the two of us! :O Not sure if friend-thing or date-thing D:

no rarity, that's what we call "pity"

Quote
@Raritysa 29 Nov
Mods change my name to Cucumber Snatch

lol this is actually funny if intentional

Quote
@Raritysa 21 Nov
@mikey_bt I'm self employed and get paid in $

Admitting that it's a whore

Quote
@Raritysa 8 Nov
I love the irony of men complaining about other men not doing feminism right

pfffhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahha
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 15, 2014, 12:21:35 AM
yeah this is most definitely a strip-club's dressing room.

@Raritysa 17 Dec
Ughhh was working and just started a show with a guy when he told me he was 17. Now I feel gross :(

ha
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 15, 2014, 01:30:47 AM
The worst was SAS and TFF when the Manti Teo girlfriend shit came out. They desperately wanted him to be gay. It was frightening, really.

SAS in general fits in this thread. I used to post there a lot but I just fucking can't anymore. Everything, EVERYTHING, devolves into RACISM!!!!! and I WANT A GAY FOOTBALL PLAYER!!!!!!

They try to make every single fucking issue about race or some other social issue and it's fucking insane and most of them don't even seem like they like sports they just watch them and bitch about them. Football forum is awful but the baseball thread has been unreadable for years.

I've been reading the N/v threads and they literally can't fucking stop.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on January 15, 2014, 03:23:26 PM


also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

Haha his tits are litarally  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on January 15, 2014, 08:42:22 PM


also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

Haha his tits are litarally  :rolleyes:

Mum and Dad must be so proud

Oh wait

Quote
@Raritysa 3h
3 days away from London and my parents has reminded just how shit my life is
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 15, 2014, 10:26:14 PM


also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

Haha his tits are litarally  :rolleyes:

Mum and Dad must be so proud

Oh wait

Quote
@Raritysa 3h
3 days away from London and my parents has reminded just how shit my life is

Owned. Just owned.  :nixon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nig Disliker on January 16, 2014, 07:07:04 AM
It's almost like her plastic surgeon did it as a big "fuck you" because I've seen flat chested chicks get bolt on tits that didn't look that bad.  Rarity was probably being a bitch during the whole consultation.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on January 16, 2014, 07:35:46 PM
How I Met Your Mother did a boring episode that spoofed kung fu episodes on Monday that brought twitter to a roar (article (http://tv.yahoo.com/blogs/tv-news/-how-i-met-your-mother-racism-creators-apologize-for-kung-fu-slapsgiving-episode-221953004.html)). This was apparently yellow face and required an apology to morons. TVIV of course realized how silly this is and thought it was dumb.

Quote from: Tatum Girlparts
It was a slap episode how could it not be funny?

But yea, it's absurd to say it's 'yellowface' that's not what that word means.

For one post.

Quote from: Sub Rosa
How is white people portraying Asian stereotypes not yellowface?

Quote from: Tatum Girlparts
Because the parody is of kung-fu movies, yellow face implies Asians themselves are being mocked, or it's something like Cloud Atlas where the white dude is actually made to look Asian in an attempt to fill an Asian role.

Based on the epic 888 I'm about to quote I'm guessing this guy is a known SJW.
Quote from: Bicyclops
As a general rule it's a good idea not to have white people playing people who are not white, even if you're doing it as a "hilarious" and deliberate homage to the way that kung fu movies do it. I won't use the word racism because that sets off people's alarms, but it's racially insensitive at best. It kind of doesn't matter that the "target" of the joke wasn't "Asian people" if your plot revolves around a white-people ~Far East~ fantasy. Yes, I'm aware that it was an extended Kill Bill reference in which they wanted to employ the main cast rather than Asian actors. Wanting to do that isn't enough of an excuse to do it. I'm sure I'll be called an "SJW" for this opinion.

Ignoring that problem, though, I thought there were a few laugh lines here and there, but the issues with the episode are a microcosm of the problems with the show. It felt stretched, drawn out, and fan service to the point of being a parody of itself. That's usually fine for the last season of a sitcom, but everyone is feeling weary of this one running too long, and turning everything up to eleven just reminds the audience of that.

The best slap will always be the early one that ended Barney's one-man show, because it was a nice, unexpected callback. I know the extreme buildup for all the others was the joke, but at some point, we've heard the joke before, and telling an extremely long version of it just feels like a shaggy dog story that you already know the ending for.

Quote from: Bicyclops
That it's obviously fake and relies on tropes doesn't nullify its insensitivity. If Marshall had been setting off to learn the ancient art of Native American warrior slapping from Chief Wearsum-Stupid-Boots, it would have been roughly the same; yes, the joke is how over-the-top and unbelievable it is and its an homage to a genre we're all familiar with and have experienced, but those are and will continue to be a paper-thin excuses.

Of course it's only coming up because it's a mainstream show, though. Why else would it come up

Quote from: Ernie.
Really, I'm not sure anyone but steadfast racists and sexists uses the 'SJW' acronym to dismiss opinions.

Either way, I'm still going to go the way of 'Twitter is batshit insane', but now I've been reading actual pieces and opinions on the episode and am kinda coming around to the idea that the show might have needed more sensibility in doing this episode in a different way mainly that: There have been enough Asian actresses/actors over the years on the show to number 3 masters and the problem is not in the portrayal, but in the action itself, because it walks all over the Asian communities' attempts to break out of the stereotypes they're laden with, and so it comes across as racially insensitive.

I still find it funny that a lot of the articles I read by non-Asian/Chinese writers were up in arms about how Lily and Robin were wearing "kimonos".

Quote from: Narcissus1916
How I Met Your Mother kinda came-of-age at a strange time in TV land. FRIENDS was even more hilariously white, but hardly anyone ever took them to task when the show was on-air.

As HIMYM has gone on (for nearly a decade) its simply become more and more expected that more shows represent america with diversity (gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, economic etc.) FOX network has particularly made this a goal, which is why if you turn on any new show you'll find way more diversity than any other mainstream network (with the exception of Dads, of course).

Look, I've defended Lena Dunham from the "The show takes place in NYC but there's no minorities?!" argument way too many times to count. Even in today's supposed hippy dippy land of enchantment, an ungodly amount of upwardly mobile middle-upper class people are going to be white, with white friends.

I didn't find Monday's episode "Racist", but I do think it was tin-eared and certainly worthy of criticism. Cultural sensitivity isn't a binary "Congratulations, you are not a racist!" either/or switch.

The response when the creators of the show apologized:
Quote from: Bicyclops
That is very classy of them and actually quite rare in terms of how people respond to this kind of criticism. Either they got some good PR advice or they made a good decision.

Quote from: BrooklynBruiser
Yeah, that's just about a perfect response to this kind of thing, I'm actually quite impressed.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on January 16, 2014, 08:52:15 PM
look if a show stars white people then portraying anything other that typical white people stuff is cultural appropriation and tantamount to war crimes
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: freak puke on January 17, 2014, 12:49:09 AM
Quote from: bicyclops
I won't use the word racism because that sets off people's alarms

"Now, I'm not saying it's racism...




but what I am saying is it's racism."
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 17, 2014, 01:27:28 AM
dog whistle antiracism
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Careless Whisper on January 17, 2014, 03:39:34 PM
Re: HIMYM episode

Quote from: Rapey Joe Stalin
Actually yeah, that's pretty fucking obviously racist.  There is no difference between that and blackface. None.

Quote from: Dr_Amazing
The whole "much gold" joke was dumb and it was one of those things that feels vaguely racist but I'm not sure why.

LITERALLY SHAKING FROM SO MUCH RACISM
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 17, 2014, 03:46:42 PM
I love "it feels racist but I'm not sure why". Literally trying his hardest to get offended at something yet can't even think up of an actual reason.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on January 18, 2014, 04:13:24 PM
Here's some Doctor Who thread nerd complaining about racism in an episode from the 70s:

Quote from: Burkion" post="424594946
I was really scared stiff when I realized the villains of the Mind of Evil was going to be the Chinese, because I was NOT in a good place for casual racisim.

(http://i.imgur.com/S6YBOks.gif)

Thank God he didn't LITERALLY DIE watching that scary tv show with CASUAL RACISM!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 18, 2014, 04:19:46 PM
Here's some Doctor Who thread nerd complaining about racism in an episode from the 70s:

Quote from: Burkion" post="424594946
I was really scared stiff when I realized the villains of the Mind of Evil was going to be the Chinese, because I was NOT in a good place for casual racisim.


jfc what a broken piece of shit
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on January 18, 2014, 04:27:28 PM
Literally triggered by children's television
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on January 18, 2014, 04:33:44 PM
Here's some Doctor Who thread nerd complaining about racism in an episode from the 70s:

Quote from: Burkion" post="424594946
I was really scared stiff when I realized the villains of the Mind of Evil was going to be the Chinese, because I was NOT in a good place for casual racisim.


jfc what a broken piece of shit
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on January 18, 2014, 05:28:08 PM
Like he goes on to saw that it wasn't that bad, but I wonder what he would have done if it HAD been casual racism.

Would he have started shaking and hugging himself and saying "NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO" ?

Would he have started crying?

Would he have called in to work?

Would he have had a panic attack and spazzed out?

Would he have had suicidal thoughts?

Like I'd love to see some goon right in the middle of a triggering "literally shaking" episode and quiz them on their what their thought process is RIGHT NOW and call them out.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Pretty Sneaky Cis on January 18, 2014, 06:08:21 PM
Okay, you assholes have whined way too much about TVIV and not nearly enough about CineD.

Fucking CineD. What a fuckpit cesshole of cumguzzling film faggots. No forum on SA will make me take a forced break as quickly or for as long a time as CineD. Let's do a rollcall of the worst ruptured anuses in that treacle mine. All quotes are recent, because I would rather yank my eyes out with my own fingers than spend more time there than I have to.

Terry van Feleday

This faggot. This faggot right here. This is the little douche nozzle who devoted an entire thread to why the Michael Bay Transformer movies are ~*~ART~*~ and not, y'know, garbage. Which they are. Utter garbage.

Quote from: Terry van Feleday" post="419851986
While Optimus complains about his missing trailer (”I need that flight tech!”), he makes kind of an interesting dance around this rather Shin Megami Tensei-esque angel. The shot begins with him to her left, in her field of view, but his back turned to her. He turns around smoothly, but just as the statue moves into his field of view, his turning suddenly speeds up, scanning the other side of the room past her. He then moves to the right, and again turns his head quickly so his view shoots right past the statue, resulting in the shot above, where he’s actually divided from her by the strong line of her wings, looking into the opposite direction. Finally, he threateningly/dramatically cocks his gun for no reason, and the camera follows him to the right, the statue exiting its view left, never to be seen again.
I find it interesting because even though the statue itself is such a striking setpiece set up to immediately draw the viewer’s attention with its visual weight, Optimus himself actively denies its presence, as though he couldn’t bear to look at it. Aside from the obvious dissociating effect of him complaining about his toys while the viewer is busy wondering why the hell there’s a huge bronze statue of a naked angel with a whip smack-dab in the middle of a church in Chicago*, keep in mind also that this is a naked female angel cast in dark metal sitting amongst a scene of destruction and defiled sanctity in a position of great lament, a series of images previously associated with the character of Megatron.

That's the first post. That's the first god damned post of his from a thread that ranks in the top ten (!) most highly rated threads on CineD and from there it just. gets. worse.

Then there's internet mastertroll SuperMechagodzilla, who's been playing the same prank for so long that he actually believes it. Supposedly, SMG is a bartender at a titty bar (the most alpha job ever, right dawg!? High five!!!) when he's not developing twelve paragraph-long monologues with annotations about how the CGI movie Hoodwinked! is actually a subtle criticism of Marxist dogma represented by the Woodsman's love of his trusty axe as evidenced by FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFARRRRRRTTT... He's also the first poster I ever chose to hide posts from.

Quote from: SuperMechagodzilla" post="424085989
It's actually the opposite.

Superman is engaged in a desperate struggle against an abstract threat - "the future," essentially. Individual casualties are deemphasized because the scale of the conflict exceeds human comprehension. It's a genuine battle between gods. (For all the talk of Marvel's cosmic stuff, MOS is cosmic in the sense of HP Lovecraft.)

In Avengers, the bulk of the conflict is spent responding to individual threats. Dr. Hulk smashes empty troop transports one at a time, lest they bump into nearby buildings, while Captain America rescues individual people on the ground. Thor and Hawkeye snipe individual grunts, and they're all basically stalling for time until the cast of Iron Man 2 actually saves the day by just closing the portal.

Avengers is consequently far more concerned about the destruction and human toll. It's just bad at it - having the cake and trying to eat it too by showing the huddled civvies getting halfassedly bombed to death.

People tend to confuse this failure to be serious with a lighthearted tone. This goes back to Iron Man 1, which features an incredibly depressing story beneath its pained smiles and flop-sweat. A superhero King Of Comedy, that one.

And, lastly, dear, dear Boomerjinks who converted a Dodge Magnum into the shittiest god damned Ecto-1 knockoff <http://boomerjinks.deviantart.com/gallery/24632909> for no real reason other than Aspergers, but still feels the need to ram that fact down your throat at every opportunity. Seriously, look at that rolling embarrassment.

Quote from: Boomerjinks" post="417223200
Since 2008 I've been working toward building a replica car club here in Denver. Our first group photo (http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2440/3812307623_a05e915dbe_o.jpg) was pretty lame.

We shot our second group photo last weekend.

[timg]http://i.imgur.com/aneTwRd.jpg[/timg]

Colorado Movie Cars members present: Bluesmobile, General Lee, Ecto-Magnum, Starsky and Hutch Torino, Umbrella Corporation Unit, Initial-D AE86, Squad 51, Bearcat (spousal honorary member), American Graffiti 1932 Coupe, Bumblebee, Black Beauty (in-progress), spy-themed Alpine, Herbie the Love Porsche, Highlander Citroen, 2008 KITT, General Lee again, Doc Hudson, and Jurassic Park Jeep.

Absentee CMC vehicles: Batman Vespa, Blue Angels Trans-Am, Bumblebee #2, Cold Warrior Jeep, Death Proof Nova, FLCL Vespa, third General Lee, GI Joe motorcycle, Hazzard County Sheriff, classic Herbie, New Herbie, Initial-D Mazda Rx-7, Jurassic Jeep #29, Jurassic Jeep #18, classic KITT, Magnum PI Ferrari, Pursuit Special, Supernatural Impala, Pizza Planet truck and the Mystery Machine.

Honestly, the possibility that any one of these utter losers might not die a virgin is reason to lie awake at night and wonder about the existence of God.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: IHaveNoMouthAndIMustSteen on January 18, 2014, 06:42:41 PM
Speaking of fine arts faggots, what ever happened to Og Oggilby?

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2689910

(http://i.somethingawful.com/u/docevil/ff/000112607/helldump1.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on January 18, 2014, 06:44:30 PM
The cabin in the woods thread was easily the worst thing I ever read on SA. The movie isn't even close to deep, but so many goons refused to understand it's central premise, with one of them just going out of his way to be the most stubborn person alive for whatever reason.

Also, I dare anyone to read this.
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3538818
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Diamond Dallas Page on January 18, 2014, 07:08:35 PM
Seeing SuperMechaGodzilla posts quoted in other forums is the entire reason I will never read a single thread in Cinema Discusso.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 18, 2014, 10:21:16 PM
If I had a late 60s charger, I would unironically paint it orange and put a confederate flag on the roof, and drive it everywhere.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: angryoldman on January 19, 2014, 03:28:56 AM
Speaking of fine arts faggots, what ever happened to Og Oggilby?

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2689910

(http://i.somethingawful.com/u/docevil/ff/000112607/helldump1.jpg)

He was the one obsessed about some stupid animated movie right? The Thief and the Cobbler?

Didn't he have a meltdown on gbsradio or something?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: bareback bathhouse sodomy on January 19, 2014, 04:26:26 AM
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3462469#post424595653 (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3462469#post424595653)

This begs the question : Was this convenient timing or did they read this and take it as a challenge so they upped the faggotry in some goony attempt to "show those permabanned pantshitters"


SA/SS has gotten so meta  I can't even tell anymore  :adam:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: HondaRider271 on January 19, 2014, 04:38:53 AM
I really did not want to have to be the word police, but Jesus Christ.

Coulda fooled me
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 19, 2014, 04:42:01 AM
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3462469#post424595653 (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3462469#post424595653)

Holy fuck this is probably the winner for the most hardcore :ultlibrage: post by a mod this year so far.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on January 19, 2014, 06:14:07 AM
If I didn't know better, I'd say the mods are having a "I dare you" competition on who can make their forum the most faggy.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 19, 2014, 06:15:31 AM
Jesus side-boob christ, who is this Vargo faggot why is he still mod? (IE undoxxed)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 19, 2014, 06:24:32 AM
Jesus side-boob christ, who is this Vargo faggot why is he still mod? (IE undoxxed)

Quote
Martin R. "Vargo" Schneider of Something Awful's Current Releases gives a speech on the role and function of critics in society in a panel at the Southern Oregon Arts and Research Conference, March 2012, Southern Oregon University.

(Note: The man asking the question at 1:47 is actually Vargo's father.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvllKC6GU3Q

e: he keeps a Formspring page even though nobody ever asked him a single question (http://new.spring.me/#!/user/SAVargo/timeline/responses)

e2: he is highly successful and respected as a film critic (http://martinrschneider.writersresidence.com/samples/references-and-citations)

from his own blurb:

Quote
Based out of Portland, Oregon, Martin Schneider has been a film critic for the Current Releases section of comedy and pop culture website SomethingAwful.com for over three years, as well as guest appearances on other sites. Beyond film criticism, Schneider also writes about pop culture and society, feminist and minority issues, political discourse, sports, music, and more words about Nicolas Cage than anyone will ever need to read in their life.

     :say:

(http://i.imgur.com/AslFqZW.png)

also, absolutely typical goon employment history (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/martin-r-schneider/2a/a3/892)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on January 19, 2014, 06:42:52 AM
What a sad little fuck.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Morty Doom on January 19, 2014, 07:00:30 AM
Its wrong that I always got a kick outta SMG's shtick isn't it?
 It may be because I come across him a lot in threads but Xenomrph's tireless defense of shitty movie franchises like AvP and Transformers is one of my least favorite things I've ever encountered there. Its okay to like something that's bad but fooling yourself into and trying to convince others it isn't shit is undefendable. A lot of it is in archives but there's 1 million posts in the Prometheus thread. Here is Xenomrph giving some awful suggestions.

On Transformers
Quote from: Xenomrph" post="330270035
Absolutely awesome movie.

There's enough references to the old cartoon and movie to keep the die-hard fans happy (ONE SHALL STAND, ONE SHALL FALL), while still being enough explanation to cater to people who have no idea what Transformers is other than "robots that turn into cars and blow eachother up".
The action is over-the-top and looks incredible, the robots are often hilarious (Ratchet is my personal favorite character in the whole movie), and Megan Fox is ridiculously gorgeous.
Go see this movie. If you like seeing towering robots wreck stuff and blow eachother up, you will not be disappointed.

5/5

On well documented poop on a disc Aliens: Colonial Marines

Quote from: Xenomrph" post="403341895
This is rumor control; here are the facts:

This game is going to be amazing.

Thank you, that is all.

Also don't forget about my Let's Play thread (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2971767) for all your Aliens/AvP gaming needs. I've even got something special planned for this weekend! :toot:


Quote from: Xenomrph" post="405650381
No it doesn't, it looks pretty kickass.

As for people talking about whether the game is any good or not, a quick google search of "Colonial Marines hands on" brings up a whole string of very recent articles.

USA Today (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gamehunters/post/2012/06/hands-on-with-aliens-colonial-marines/1#.UARvlJHleSo)

GameFront (http://www.gamefront.com/e3-2012-aliens-colonial-marines-hands-on-a-pants-crapping-experience/)

OXCGN.com (http://oxcgn.com/2012/06/16/e3-2012-aliens-colonial-marines-hands-on-preview/)

Xbox360Achievements.com (http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-12060-E3-2012--Aliens--Colonial-Marines-Hands-On-Multiplayer-Preview---Coming-Out-of-the-Walls.html)

The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2012/apr/04/aliens-colonial-marines-multiplayer-preview)

SKNR.net (http://sknr.net/2012/06/30/aliens-colonial-marines-hands-on-impressions/)

Shogungamer.com (http://shogungamer.com/news/14125/aliens-colonial-marines-hands-e3-2012)

The Reticule.com (http://www.thereticule.com/aliens-colonial-marines-multiplayer-hands-on/)

You'll find that they're all quite positive. :)


Quote from: Xenomrph" post="405692873
AvP2010 was plenty good and well liked too (at least going by the user ratings on sites like metacritic, gamespot, imdb, and amazon) so I dunno.

Like I said this game looks plenty good too, and based on the 8 hands-on reviews I posted (and the numerous others you can find via google, just like I did) literally everyone who's played it so far has used the adjectives "scary" and "fun". I'm not particularly worried about not getting my money's worth out of this game.

I realise this more games than movies but my point is constant poor opinions and refusal to face reality, all the AvP and transformers film threads are archives.

Quote from: the black husserl" post="407097582
Can everybody please stop trying to have an objective discussion about the latest mediocre Alien project with a poster named "Xenomorph"?

He probably liked Prometheus for god's sake.

Quote from: Xenomrph" post="407099537
"Xenomorph" is a completely different user. :colbert:

I liked 'Prometheus'... with serious reservations. It was kinda all over the place, and while I liked the visuals, it was a struggle to like much of anything else (other than Michael Fassbender).

And to be honest a lot of the AvP superfans on other forums I frequent have been sperging out about really meaningless minutiae that would make this forum look completely fair and reasonable, it's totally pointless to have any kind of discussions over there.

But seriously Colonial Marines looks like a total blast, and based on literally every gameplay review on the internet including one by a goon on this very page, it is.

If this game is considered "fucking terrible" by goons who haven't played it (and "good fun" by those who did), I kind of have to wonder what games armchair goon critics think are actually good. Even the latest AvP game, which goons shat all over, was generally (http://www.amazon.com/Aliens-vs-Predator-Xbox-360/product-reviews/B001TOQ8MU/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1) well (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1376693/) liked (http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/aliens-vs-predator) by gamers.

Maybe since I don't post in Games a whole lot I'm not used to the trend of wacky goon hyperbole or something, I dunno. Game looks great, I'm confident I'll enjoy it, I bet it'll get comparable reviews to AvP2010 and be received about as well by gamers.


If I didn't know better, i'd swear he was a 20th century fox paid shill.  16!!!!!! Pages of posts in the Prometheus thread alone.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on January 19, 2014, 07:48:23 AM
A goon whose entire online identity is that of a tireless unpaid shill for a sci-fi franchise that's seen better days? That sounds familiar...

 :aatrek:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on January 19, 2014, 07:55:05 AM


also, absolutely typical goon employment history (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/martin-r-schneider/2a/a3/892)

(http://i.imgur.com/grVwsW4.gif)

why the fuck would you pay for a resume from someone who has a) never worked in HR or as a hiring manager and b) never even really had a steady job?

seriously, goons?  hate to beat the obvious and very dead horse but wtf.  stop being so goddamned stupid.

(http://i.imgur.com/nhLllP0.gif)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Professor of Niggerology on January 19, 2014, 10:11:58 AM
I like his work history, worked at walmart for 4 years, got a real job and was fired after 2 months. Why would you even put that shit on your resume? Working somewhere for 2 months looks awful.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on January 19, 2014, 11:54:10 AM
How stupid/goony do you have to be to get fired from a good company like Intel?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 19, 2014, 12:09:14 PM
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3462469&pagenumber=1#lastpost

i noticed they left the rules thread unlocked

so i posted the first thing i thought when i read that pile of nonsense.


Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on January 19, 2014, 12:12:02 PM
I like his work history, worked at walmart for 4 years, got a real job and was fired after 2 months. Why would you even put that shit on your resume? Working somewhere for 2 months looks awful.
Generally whenever you see someone work some place for 1 year it's understood to be "kind of a fuck up we put up with for a while." Getting fired within the first 3 months is pretty damn impressive.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dudebro on January 19, 2014, 12:17:42 PM
DO NOT REFER TO WOMEN (or people, but let's face it, I mean "women") BY THEIR BODY PARTS, AS THOUGH THE BODY PART IS THEIR ENTIRE ENTITY.

While we're at it, stop saying "females" when you mean "women" "girls" or even "ladies." "Females" as adjective is fine, "females" as a noun makes it sound like they're a group of Rhesus monkeys whose mating habits you are studying for a National Geographic documentary.

  :slutwalk:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 19, 2014, 12:48:05 PM
saving those posts for posterity

(http://i.imgur.com/GhXNeTW.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/VWsjDgP.png)

and the reaction:
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3571701&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=600#post424628174
Quote from: Vargo
I am the third mod since Clumsy re-wrote the rules thread and never closed it. The only time this becomes an issue is when I say "Hey, let's not be assholes to women." Are you loving kidding me here?
Quote from: TwistedLadder
But Vaaaaargoooo, how can I possibly enjoy talking about movies if I can't talk about women like they're purely pieces of meat for me stick my dick in? Treating women and incredibly talented actresses like they're people is haaaard
Quote from: weekly font
Are you talking about the two assholes who signed up within the last month trolling you? I don't think anyone who actually posts here is going to give you guff about that.
Quote from: Vargo
Yeah, they're pretty obvious trolls, and it's probably my fault for not locking the thread. But still. Goddamn.

It just makes me angry because I'm making a real conscious effort to make this less of a "boy's club." and that undermines it.
Quote from: Professor Clumsy
Never be mod. That's my advice.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 19, 2014, 12:52:36 PM
theyve got my number. I asked if he was autistic because i hate women, not that he has really creepy ideas about social interaction.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 19, 2014, 12:56:40 PM
but see Professor Clumsy explained why that's necessary:

Quote from: Professor Clumsy
My policy as mod was this: If someone clicks on a thread in this forum, they don't want to read a load of stupid shit. So I policed your thoughts.

He kind of meant it as a joke, but that's more or less what they do
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 19, 2014, 01:18:31 PM
severe self esteem issues 101
Quote from: Vargo" post="424630099
Yes, in  a sense. I think we're contributing to the overall objectification of women that makes it okay to continue judging them by their ooks alone, instead of talent, performance, or any of the literally thousands of other things that you should be talking about in a discussion of movies.

I want to have a forum where we can have discussions like "Does the male gaze-iness of this film hurt its all-around message" and discuss overall objectification in film and media. That's a discussion that should be had, and I can't run that forum and also let that shit fly.

More importantly, letting this continue contributes to the "Boy's Club" that CineD is, which is why it's thought of as such an echo chamber. I want other groups to be in here helping overall film discussion, because CineD is like 95% white men between the ages of 18-35. That doesn't help discussion. I want this to be a place where other, often marginaized groups are comfortable posting, and if I need to make it so you can't make unfunny, unoriginal jokes, and have to consider what you're saying before you say it in order to do that, then so be it.

Quote from: Vargo" post="424630234
It... it does, though? You're referring to a person by a body part. Like, you're acting as though "Amy Adams' cleavage" is a person, thereby implying that Amy Adams is not, or is less of a person than her cleavage is. That's the the literal definition of dehumanizing someone.

Also, if you notice, the rule isn't "Don't mention boobs", it's "Don't refer to people by their body parts."
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 19, 2014, 01:19:37 PM
tbh i get what Vargo is TRYING to do, he's trying to make it less of a creepy THESE FUCKING FEMALES!!! kinda deal, but he's just overarching into autism. sure, eliminate the opportunity for goons to say, "wow, good job [female actress's sideboob] for getting the oscar" in a facetious way, but then he should also make the degrading discussion of male sexuality just as bannable imo.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 19, 2014, 01:21:31 PM
severe self esteem issues 101
Quote from: Vargo" post="424630099
Yes, in  a sense. I think we're contributing to the overall objectification of women that makes it okay to continue judging them by their ooks alone, instead of talent, performance, or any of the literally thousands of other things that you should be talking about in a discussion of movies.

I want to have a forum where we can have discussions like "Does the male gaze-iness of this film hurt its all-around message" and discuss overall objectification in film and media. That's a discussion that should be had, and I can't run that forum and also let that shit fly.

More importantly, letting this continue contributes to the "Boy's Club" that CineD is, which is why it's thought of as such an echo chamber. I want other groups to be in here helping overall film discussion, because CineD is like 95% white men between the ages of 18-35. That doesn't help discussion. I want this to be a place where other, often marginaized groups are comfortable posting, and if I need to make it so you can't make unfunny, unoriginal jokes, and have to consider what you're saying before you say it in order to do that, then so be it.

Quote from: Vargo" post="424630234
It... it does, though? You're referring to a person by a body part. Like, you're acting as though "Amy Adams' cleavage" is a person, thereby implying that Amy Adams is not, or is less of a person than her cleavage is. That's the the literal definition of dehumanizing someone.

Also, if you notice, the rule isn't "Don't mention boobs", it's "Don't refer to people by their body parts."

No, Vargo. The media is going to continue to sell sex whether or not you make it a bannable trigger on your subforum or not. I don't wanna see a single dick reference on your forum. I'm about equality, here.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 19, 2014, 01:27:59 PM
prolly what they all think they are to women and minorities http://i.4cdn.org/b/src/1390139626545.png
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 19, 2014, 01:33:08 PM
Quote
Show's over folks, nothing to see here.

i made the bad ppl go away
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 19, 2014, 01:39:27 PM
How the fuck does saying 'Amy whatever's cleavage' is turning her into an object, or her breasts are more of a person than she is? That's fucking ridiculous. It's a fucking object identifying it's just basic grammar and how people talk what is wrong with him?

Seriously saying "Man, Jennifer Aniston has a great ass" is find according to those rules, but :madgoon: "Jennifer Aniston's ass is great" :ultlibrage: and probation
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 19, 2014, 02:06:02 PM
my guess was crippling self esteem issues
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 19, 2014, 02:21:20 PM
Yo, so answer me this thought I just had.

If the SJWs say "Making jokes on a comedy forum hasn't been a valid defense since 2007 when the forums grew up" why are the mods still petty assholes who make such WITTY sick burns every oportunity they can when they take someone's $10? Why do mod still make retarded ban/probate me threads with purposely ridiculous rules if this isn't an immature comedy forum?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hashtag Activist on January 19, 2014, 02:22:48 PM
Have these guys ever heard women talk about an actor like Bradley Cooper or Leonardo DeCaprio?  My guess is no, because that conversation usually doesn't involve "Oh I thought he was very good at portraying this character and really brought it to life".  Usually it involves into how attractive he is.  These rules are meant to protect the cat ladies and troons on the forum from having to think about comparing themselves to attractive and successful women.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 19, 2014, 02:24:30 PM
Jesus side-boob christ, who is this Vargo faggot why is he still mod? (IE undoxxed)

Quote
Martin R. "Vargo" Schneider of Something Awful's Current Releases gives a speech on the role and function of critics in society in a panel at the Southern Oregon Arts and Research Conference, March 2012, Southern Oregon University.

(Note: The man asking the question at 1:47 is actually Vargo's father.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvllKC6GU3Q

e: he keeps a Formspring page even though nobody ever asked him a single question (http://new.spring.me/#!/user/SAVargo/timeline/responses)

e2: he is highly successful and respected as a film critic (http://martinrschneider.writersresidence.com/samples/references-and-citations)

from his own blurb:

Quote
Based out of Portland, Oregon, Martin Schneider has been a film critic for the Current Releases section of comedy and pop culture website SomethingAwful.com for over three years, as well as guest appearances on other sites. Beyond film criticism, Schneider also writes about pop culture and society, feminist and minority issues, political discourse, sports, music, and more words about Nicolas Cage than anyone will ever need to read in their life.

     :say:

(http://i.imgur.com/AslFqZW.png)

also, absolutely typical goon employment history (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/martin-r-schneider/2a/a3/892)

Yo Clem top notch work but I can't let this go into that good night. People need to see the fat balding white knight of Amy Adams' sideboob.

They also need to read the typos in the goddamn resume of a fucking writer who couldn't handle being a twitter bitch for intel for longer than 60 days.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 19, 2014, 02:28:52 PM
works for me, im prob banned after the 6 hours is up anyway otherwise id post it in gbs or fyad
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 19, 2014, 02:31:09 PM
his linkedin lol
Quote
Entertainment/Movie Critic
Something Awful
Privately Held; 11-50 employees; Writing and Editing industry
August 2010 – Present (3 years 6 months)

Wrote weekly bylined 1K-word articles on with a readership of over 100K, providing cultural analysis of current and previously released films, as well as special events including holiday gift guides and Philadelphia Film Festival coverage for a pop culture site that reaches 500K readers per week, and guest columns on colleague sites.

Earned recognition and mention in MovieLine, Entertainment Weekly, and Huffington Post articles for insightful writing and interviewing of film directors.

Proofread and edited three articles from colleagues per week for grammar, content, and flow, with one-day deadlines, using Google Docs.

Implemented social networking, updating the column’s 1.5K-fan Facebook page twice weekly with column links and extra commentary while addressing reader questions and comments and tracking reach and demographics with Facebook Analytics.

Researched political and social context, as well as production history for films through online resources and film journals.


11-50 employees :lolno:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: wtb jewpocalypse on January 19, 2014, 02:35:03 PM
Speaking of fine arts faggots, what ever happened to Og Oggilby?

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2689910

(http://i.somethingawful.com/u/docevil/ff/000112607/helldump1.jpg)

He's Egbert Souse
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 19, 2014, 02:37:31 PM
his linkedin lol
Quote
Entertainment/Movie Critic
Something Awful
Privately Held; 11-50 employees; Writing and Editing industry
August 2010 – Present (3 years 6 months)

Wrote weekly bylined 1K-word articles on with a readership of over 100K, providing cultural analysis of current and previously released films, as well as special events including holiday gift guides and Philadelphia Film Festival coverage for a pop culture site that reaches 500K readers per week, and guest columns on colleague sites.

Earned recognition and mention in MovieLine, Entertainment Weekly, and Huffington Post articles for insightful writing and interviewing of film directors.

Proofread and edited three articles from colleagues per week for grammar, content, and flow, with one-day deadlines, using Google Docs.

Implemented social networking, updating the column’s 1.5K-fan Facebook page twice weekly with column links and extra commentary while addressing reader questions and comments and tracking reach and demographics with Facebook Analytics.

Researched political and social context, as well as production history for films through online resources and film journals.


11-50 employees :lolno:

At least one of those is a volunteer. Godspeed, Badvertising.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on January 19, 2014, 02:51:08 PM
his linkedin lol
Quote
Entertainment/Movie Critic
Something Awful
Privately Held; 11-50 employees; Writing and Editing industry
August 2010 – Present (3 years 6 months)

Wrote weekly bylined 1K-word articles on with a readership of over 100K, providing cultural analysis of current and previously released films, as well as special events including holiday gift guides and Philadelphia Film Festival coverage for a pop culture site that reaches 500K readers per week, and guest columns on colleague sites.

Earned recognition and mention in MovieLine, Entertainment Weekly, and Huffington Post articles for insightful writing and interviewing of film directors.

Proofread and edited three articles from colleagues per week for grammar, content, and flow, with one-day deadlines, using Google Docs.

Implemented social networking, updating the column’s 1.5K-fan Facebook page twice weekly with column links and extra commentary while addressing reader questions and comments and tracking reach and demographics with Facebook Analytics.

Researched political and social context, as well as production history for films through online resources and film journals.


11-50 employees :lolno:

pop culture site that reaches 500K readers per week

the column’s 1.5K-fan Facebook page twice weekly

lol I wonder how impressed prospective employers would be by his 1 in 300 batting average to just get someone to click a "Like" button. 
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 19, 2014, 03:02:02 PM
Why in the world would you ever refer a potential hirer to your somethingawful account? It's not a very good representative of you as far as work and work ethics are concerned. You sit at your computer and make sure people posting cat pictures are up to "Standard" for absolutely zero practical purpose, you use inappropriate language unsuitable for professional environments, discuss inappropriate/even potential deal breaker-to-employer things, and if you're a mod or admin there's a treasure trove of evidence showing you're a whiny man/womanchild with no real life prospects as a 30 something year old who can handle neither dissenting opinions nor potentially heated discussion amongst adults in which opinions and beliefs may be offended or challenged. In order to be a fucking greeter at Wal Mart you're required to be able to at least convince a supervisor you can handle that kind of shit to even get an interview. You also get heaps of exhibits showing that when given any power he/they don't moderate or delegate according to the team's (ie company's) needs, but rather for satisfying their own personal Weltanschaaung based on the inept crippled state of being a man/womanchild who cares more about video game feminism than actual human beings or bettering themselves. You'd get way more evidence that hiring one to be a general manager would be more likely to "suspend" an employee from work if they voted for Romney as opposed to doing a poor job.


There's not even anyone to write a letter of recommendation, and obviously public opinion of these people would serve as a very, very negative unofficial letter. Why are these people so unaware and unable to function like adults?

tl;dr i wouldn't cite my crybaby soapbox powerhungry mod position on somethingfuckingawful to an employer in 20fucking14. there's a difference in marketable internet work experience between being a senior coder or pr rep at facebook and a hall monitor on internet kindergarten.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on January 19, 2014, 03:56:56 PM
tl;dr i wouldn't cite my crybaby soapbox powerhungry mod position on somethingfuckingawful to an employer in 20fucking14. there's a difference in marketable internet work experience between being a senior coder or pr rep at facebook and a hall monitor on internet kindergarten.

These are the same people who list their World of Warcraft raid leader experience in their CV.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 19, 2014, 03:58:18 PM
a hall monitor on internet kindergarten.

ck has been knocking it out of the park all week
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on January 19, 2014, 04:06:33 PM
his linkedin lol
Quote
Entertainment/Movie Critic
Something Awful
Privately Held; 11-50 employees; Writing and Editing industry
August 2010 – Present (3 years 6 months)

Wrote weekly bylined 1K-word articles on with a readership of over 100K, providing cultural analysis of current and previously released films, as well as special events including holiday gift guides and Philadelphia Film Festival coverage for a pop culture site that reaches 500K readers per week, and guest columns on colleague sites.

Earned recognition and mention in MovieLine, Entertainment Weekly, and Huffington Post articles for insightful writing and interviewing of film directors.

Proofread and edited three articles from colleagues per week for grammar, content, and flow, with one-day deadlines, using Google Docs.

Implemented social networking, updating the column’s 1.5K-fan Facebook page twice weekly with column links and extra commentary while addressing reader questions and comments and tracking reach and demographics with Facebook Analytics.

Researched political and social context, as well as production history for films through online resources and film journals.


11-50 employees :lolno:

 :swanson:: "...and what was the rate of pay at this movie critic job?"
 :bernanke:

Quote
Appropriate: We should all watch more films with female directors.
Inappropriate: Females can be good directors.

(http://i.imgur.com/AJqdbKA.jpg): What if I want to just say "we should all watch more films with male directors? Would that be an appropriate word choice?"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Pretty Sneaky Cis on January 19, 2014, 04:07:48 PM
saving those posts for posterity
and the reaction:

Y'know, I'm a moderate. But I've been a liberal in my life when I was younger. Y'know how it is, "Young conservatives don't have hearts, old liberals don't have brains." Even then, though, I had no patience for echo chambers. And that's all SA is these days, CD in particular: a liberal echo chamber.

One thing I happen to particularly like about SS is that people tend to think for themselves based on life experiences because minority/feminist tolerance culture in modern America is utter bullshit. However, when someone pops into a thread going "Hur hur, those naggers, huh?" most posters seem to tell them just to shut the fuck up and stop being an edgy twelve-year old.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: I fucking hate goons on January 19, 2014, 05:04:46 PM
saving those posts for posterity
and the reaction:

Y'know, I'm a moderate. But I've been a liberal in my life when I was younger. Y'know how it is, "Young conservatives don't have hearts, old liberals don't have brains." Even then, though, I had no patience for echo chambers. And that's all SA is these days, CD in particular: a liberal echo chamber.

I don't think this shit is even conservative v. liberal. It's ok to be liberal- you can be whatever the fuck you want in America, that's the beauty of it. SA isn't liberal- it's fucking stupid. You can be a liberal and not be a fucking moron, not be chained down by white guilt and patriarchy and racism and misogyny and trannies, and whatever the fuck else that that stupid fucking website cries about in every single goddamn post.

There's a reason every faggot who is obsessed with PATRIARCHY, RACISM, MISOGYNY, TRANNIES, is in college, saddled with 40k in loans, no future, never had a job before, can't make anything over 8 dollars an hour, it's because they're all fucking LOSERS
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: IHaveNoMouthAndIMustSteen on January 19, 2014, 05:24:21 PM
Speaking of fine arts faggots, what ever happened to Og Oggilby?

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2689910

(http://i.somethingawful.com/u/docevil/ff/000112607/helldump1.jpg)

He's Egbert Souse

Holy shit that dumb crosseyed faggot still posts after getting run off in total humiliation?

It's bad enough when people rereg after getting banned. Reregging after you got banned because hundreds of people supported your horrible opinions being banished? What a fucking sucker.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 19, 2014, 05:35:20 PM
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3462469&pagenumber=1#lastpost

i noticed they left the rules thread unlocked

so i posted the first thing i thought when i read that pile of nonsense.

:kaneclap:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on January 19, 2014, 06:13:39 PM
Saying an actresses cleavage should win an Oscar absolutely is objectifying her IMO. BUT, that is how normal people, men and women talk. Would I talk like that to ladies in hr at my job? Hell no. Would I as a professional movie reviewer not working for maxim or something like that talk like that in my writing? Hell no. Would I expect normal people including myself on an internet forum to? Hell yes.

I just gis'ed Amy Adams (didn't know who) and she practically doesn't even have any. Wtf?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 19, 2014, 06:57:28 PM
Saying an actresses cleavage should win an Oscar absolutely is objectifying her IMO. BUT, that is how normal people, men and women talk. Would I talk like that to ladies in hr at my job? Hell no. Would I as a professional movie reviewer not working for maxim or something like that talk like that in my writing? Hell no. Would I expect normal people including myself on an internet forum to? Hell yes.

I just gis'ed Amy Adams (didn't know who) and she practically doesn't even have any. Wtf?

exactly. turns out 99.9% of the world - regardless of race, age, gender, colour, religion - is a little sexist and racist, but not to the point of hating, mistreating, disliking, or wishing harm on whole demographics in a sociopathic manner. Why, sometimes men and women are driven by pure sexual want and masturbate to the thought of another sexualized individual, and still treat a partner or other human beings with respect!!!!!!!!!!! What I'm saying is sometimes people make less than pc comments that don't reflect their beliefs humans are capable of multilayered thought and speech unlike superior, always morally correct goon automatons beep borp
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on January 19, 2014, 07:03:00 PM
Plus when I see "congrats so and so's cleavage for the oscar" I assumed it was them underhandedly making a comment at the way she is either:

-a really bad but hypersexualized actress who got the award on that principle alone
-her acting skills are whatever but her dress at the rewards ceremony was super revealing and the camera kept focusing on it.


I didn't immediately think of horny goon dogs objectifying her because I'm not obsessed with social justice and seeing women as objects in every little thing? I think this guy is protesting WAY too much.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: I fucking hate goons on January 19, 2014, 07:27:34 PM
Saying an actresses cleavage should win an Oscar absolutely is objectifying her IMO. BUT, that is how normal people, men and women talk. Would I talk like that to ladies in hr at my job? Hell no. Would I as a professional movie reviewer not working for maxim or something like that talk like that in my writing? Hell no. Would I expect normal people including myself on an internet forum to? Hell yes.

I just gis'ed Amy Adams (didn't know who) and she practically doesn't even have any. Wtf?

Yep... they're not normal people, they're fucking goons.

My question is, who taught them to think like this? I graduated college in 2009 and this type of shit wasn't prevalent in my academic circles. Has the university landscape in the past 5 years been inundated with tranny professors screaming about this shit? Who taught these faggots how to think like they think?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on January 19, 2014, 09:20:15 PM
Maybe if these doughy, patchy-bearded manchildren allowed themselves some moderate sexual objectification from time to time they wouldn't be kissless virgins in their late twenties and early thirties.

"S-so when we first meet on the date do I kiss the back of her hand or just hold it and bow my head over it?"

Not even that, but anyone who's ever been in any sort of workplace dynamic where colleagues get on well with each other or even if they're just friends with normal fucking people knows that casual,  jocular "sexism" or innocent flirting or innuendo is just par for the course in normal human interaction. It don't mean shit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on January 20, 2014, 06:42:39 AM
So the rules are to make it more accepting to women? Wouldn't eliminating the mods like Gendo, Louisgod, and Loosechanj who sexually harass female goons be a better use of effort? Does a female goon care more about a comment on Amy Adam's cleavage or about having a fuckup like Gendo send her boss nudes?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on January 20, 2014, 07:03:24 AM
So Vargo's only real job was working for a few years at Walmart? He's now been unemployed for 5-6 months and just posts on SA and thinks it's a job? WTF?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Professor of Niggerology on January 20, 2014, 07:33:49 AM
So Vargo's only real job was working for a few years at Walmart? He's now been unemployed for 5-6 months and just posts on SA and thinks it's a job? WTF?
Only the finest fuck ups make mod at SA.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Pretty Sneaky Cis on January 20, 2014, 08:26:02 AM
Wife finally convinced me to take her to see Frozen last night, and it was relatively forgettable, minus the overarching themes that men are evil or just plain weird and creepy at best, and true love between the sexes doesn't exist and can only be found between sisters (there was a point made that brothers will just be monsters toward each other for no reason). On a whim, I decided to check and see if SA had a Frozen thread. Looks like they do! I'll just pop in and chec--

Quote from: aBagorn" post="424552780
Slightly off topic, but thanks to discussing the LBGT themes in Frozen, I literally just picked up on the transgender subtext of The Little Mermaid and it's so obvious I feel dumb (especially as someone who identifies on the genderqueer spectrum slightly) that it took me this long.


NOPE. 
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: VFW on January 20, 2014, 08:29:55 AM
Wife finally convinced me to take her to see Frozen last night, and it was relatively forgettable, minus the overarching themes that men are evil or just plain weird and creepy at best, and true love between the sexes doesn't exist and can only be found between sisters (there was a point made that brothers will just be monsters toward each other for no reason). On a whim, I decided to check and see if SA had a Frozen thread. Looks like they do! I'll just pop in and chec--

Quote from: aBagorn" post="424552780
Slightly off topic, but thanks to discussing the LBGT themes in Frozen, I literally just picked up on the transgender subtext of The Little Mermaid and it's so obvious I feel dumb (especially as someone who identifies on the genderqueer spectrum slightly) that it took me this long.


NOPE.

Faggots think everyone is trying to speak to them in code. It's one giant case of selection bias.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on January 20, 2014, 09:07:11 AM
Yeah I bet Hans Christian Anderson was all about transgender issues when he wrote that shit, like, two hundred years ago.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on January 20, 2014, 09:09:59 AM
I thought libs and feminists hated the little mermaid because she gives up her voice and who she is to impress/get with a man.

Also they say the scene where triton wrecks her cave full of collectibles is a metaphorical rape. Not shitting.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 20, 2014, 11:52:48 AM
they like to leave the rules threads open http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=1073001&pagenumber=1#lastpost
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on January 20, 2014, 03:13:34 PM
What did you post in the op of this thread before it was gassed? http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3603675
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on January 20, 2014, 03:26:51 PM
Guess which TV/IV thread these are from:

Quote from: deadicons" post="424536603
Utilitarianism taken to an extreme will tell you that we should kill everybody who turns up HIV positive; if we were to kill them as soon as it would decrease (and depending on who you do it stop) the rate of infection as well as lower medical costs.  This would do the most good for the most people, but this to most people this is an unacceptable course of action because it is so inhuman.

Quote from: Bongo Bill" post="424546476
*Character* is Machiavellian. The fact that they'd demonstrate this quality in such detail with a major sympathetic character gives me confidence that they're not building up to the tired old (oversimplified, even - dare I say it - problematic) cliches of ambition leading to monstrosity, a respect for necessity leading to tyranny, intelligence and self-control indicating untrustworthiness, or any other such reactionary stereotypes.

The same writers that made this complex character - and the complex show she exists in - aren't going to throw all that away, contradict their prior themes, and betray their artistic consciences by flattening her for the sake of drama. They might for the sake of a gag, though.


children's cartoon Adventure Time
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on January 20, 2014, 03:42:01 PM
Now I have a place to post my three hundred page thesis on the second wave feminist implications of Jem and the Holograms.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 20, 2014, 11:30:49 PM
What did you post in the op of this thread before it was gassed? http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3603675

just some quotes from vargo about needing to regulate the plebes to protect women and then I posted his SA excerpt from linked in
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 20, 2014, 11:31:29 PM
Guess which TV/IV thread these are from:

Quote from: deadicons" post="424536603
Utilitarianism taken to an extreme will tell you that we should kill everybody who turns up HIV positive; if we were to kill them as soon as it would decrease (and depending on who you do it stop) the rate of infection as well as lower medical costs.  This would do the most good for the most people, but this to most people this is an unacceptable course of action because it is so inhuman.


Quote from: Bongo Bill" post="424546476
*Character* is Machiavellian. The fact that they'd demonstrate this quality in such detail with a major sympathetic character gives me confidence that they're not building up to the tired old (oversimplified, even - dare I say it - problematic) cliches of ambition leading to monstrosity, a respect for necessity leading to tyranny, intelligence and self-control indicating untrustworthiness, or any other such reactionary stereotypes.

The same writers that made this complex character - and the complex show she exists in - aren't going to throw all that away, contradict their prior themes, and betray their artistic consciences by flattening her for the sake of drama. They might for the sake of a gag, though.


children's cartoon Adventure Time

christ
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 21, 2014, 12:17:11 AM
oh ya i got the exmod prof clumsy to defend women by threatening to beat up someone he thought was a chick (me) in the cind gen thread
Quote
I'm going to harm your boobs. With my fists. By punching them (your boobs).
Quote
I once herded thousands of Jews into a large room and pumped gas into it, killing them all. LOL
Quote
Your boobs keep making these posts and my penis keeps replying, slapping against the keyboard like a suffocating fish. Plap plap plap. You are boobs and a vagina. Plap plap.
Quote
I'm not. I am exactly as good as this. This is it for me. I never top replying facetiously to trolls on the internet. Sometimes I go days, weeks, months without even communicating with a human being in anticipation of moments like this. I'm going to eat lots of cheese now and thud myself off to the sound of dying rats.

in another context would be kind of funny imo if it wasn't kind of a meltdown. Remember that aint fyad or gbs, saying any of the above in cined would get you immediately banned. but me telling the mod that they might have some self esteem issues got me a perma lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 21, 2014, 12:18:37 AM
another thing that will own vargo forever is seeing his rules threads marred and the other two rules movie rec threads marred (noone had posted in them for like 2-3 years)
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=1073001
Quote
theres 36 rules in here

in the 'did you like the movie' subforum
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 22, 2014, 03:36:36 PM
Here's a great example of a goon letting the truth out without realizing it

Quote from: FactsAreUseless
I realized the other day that Orphan Black might be one of the most progressive shows I've seen on TV, from a feminist perspective. All the major characters are women, men in the show exist only to interact with women characters, and the lead character isn't motivated by revenge (at least initially), unlike other action/suspense shows with a female lead. It's pretty impressive.

The way you get closer to a progressive future/feminism is by reducing men into background furniture and not by creating an actual equal status between them, or presenting men and women as men and women and not archetypes.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on January 22, 2014, 03:53:28 PM
a woman driven by revenge sounds pretty misogynistic to me
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on January 22, 2014, 03:58:09 PM
The main characters in Orphan Black are literally clones created as genetic experiments who are patented property of the corporation who designed them who have spent their entire lives being monitored and drugged at night for medical testing.


PROGRESSIVE!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on January 22, 2014, 08:37:34 PM
SuperMechaGodzilla wonders why people don't like him in the Robots vs Giant Monsters thread

Quote
It's weird that I mostly/only get this reaction from the Pacific Rim thread. I do not receive similar complaints about Her or Star Wars, despite using exactly the same approach in those threads.

The only real difference is that, while I liked Star Wars and thought Her was OK, I disliked Pacific Rim.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 22, 2014, 08:46:31 PM
SuperMechaGodzilla wonders why people don't like him in the Robots vs Giant Monsters thread

Quote
It's weird that I mostly/only get this reaction from the Pacific Rim thread. I do not receive similar complaints about Her or Star Wars, despite using exactly the same approach in those threads.

The only real difference is that, while I liked Star Wars and thought Her was OK, I disliked Pacific Rim.

Why do people who want to talk about a movie dislike me just because I thought the movie was huge piece of shit and think if you even have mixed feeling about it you are objectively wrong?!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 22, 2014, 11:05:28 PM
Perfect example of SJW shenanigans in CineD or what?

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3455569&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=280#post424786713
Quote from: euphronius
Quote from: rakovsky maybe
No one would complain about the padding if it was actually any good, the problem is it isn't.

Adding Tauriel as a lust-object in an incredibly overdone love triangle is more insulting than not having a female presence. The thirty minutes of Smaug action lack any tension or even basic narrative sense. No one cares - at all - about the orc and his orc son. Beorn was shoehorned in badly for no reason, the movie would have been better without him.

We've seen all this before, Peter Jackson did the same exact thing with King Kong. That movie was a bloated mess that needed a lot of editing and the Hobbit movies are too.

Saying Tauriel's role was "lust object" says more about you than the movie I'm afraid.

It appears Vargo's recent modification to CineD's rules about mentioning attractiveness of women has emboldened faggots of the word police brigade such as euphronius. He's also a D&D regular as well, go figure.

About the issue, yes, people were screaming for a hot girl (of course, let's make it an elf!) in the hobbit sequels because of no female characters being in the first one.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on January 22, 2014, 11:21:25 PM
They specifically went back and added a love triangle for her. To pretend she isn't a lust object is absurd.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on January 22, 2014, 11:27:22 PM
who knew SS gave a shit about the objectification of fantasy movie elves
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 22, 2014, 11:27:57 PM
who knew SS gave a shit about the objectification of fantasy movie elves

You mean SA?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 22, 2014, 11:29:39 PM
who knew SS gave a shit about the objectification of fantasy movie elves

I care
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on January 22, 2014, 11:37:07 PM
who knew SS gave a shit about the objectification of fantasy movie elves

You mean SA?

Nah this guy

They specifically went back and added a love triangle for her. To pretend she isn't a lust object is absurd.

thought I stepped into the twilight zone for a second  :jesse:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on January 22, 2014, 11:40:41 PM
I don't care. There was just a wave of articles in December talking about it:
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-news/the-promise--hobbit--filmmakers-broke-to-evangeline-lilly-211339686.html
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on January 23, 2014, 12:05:09 PM
She personifies lust alright: the Hollywood Jews' lust for money. Her creation and all the shit that goes with it is a vital cog in the giant piss-taking machine that allows Peter Jackson to turn a 300 page book into three separate movies in order to extract oodles of cash from fucking idiots, the money-grubbing fat cunt. Does the first one not have an hour of dwarves doing dishes or some shit?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: floundering 2.wh0a on January 23, 2014, 12:48:26 PM
How stupid/goony do you have to be to get fired from a good company like Intel?

This is sort of Intel's thing.  About 70% of the time if you're hired by Intel, you were only hired because they needed X people on Y project and, once that project's done, you'll be shown the door.  Lots of dumbasses make the mistake of thinking that they're GETTING A JOB WITH INTEL, OH WOW, when really they were just a body that could do a thing until it no longer needed doing.  It's a good company to work for if you're the kind of person Intel is looking to hire as a career employee, but that oil slick with a website definitely fits the "interchangeable cog" hiring process in the lower ranks.
---
Like with GBS, if CineD and TV/IV had their own little arab spring, all this smg worship and sjw shit would be gone in 48 hours, tops.  I bet you half the posters who write this hang wringy shit about how Operation Dumbo Drop is actually a potent metaphor for american colonialism and claim to have panic attacks when there's so much as a hint of an ism in their fave tv programs are just doing it because they think they have to, and would immediately start having actual fun talking about the movies and tv programs themselves.

Speaking of smg, he's getting a lot of off CineD attention these days
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3591887

Poor guy can't catch a break
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3603691&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=4#post424707413

Quote from: supes
Since I am a pretentious film major, I believe that meaning is literally hidden inside texts, like the computer scene in Zoolander. If I crack open the computer and find little, it's because the computer wasn't 'deep' enough.

I use similar mystical terms like 'substance' to make my feelings seem quantifiable. When I look at a book, I focus less on reading than on imagining the inner life of the writer. I often fear that writers are tricking me into thinking they are deep, so I reject 'shallow style' in favor of 'deep substance'. The idea of being trolled preoccupies me.

Since I can't crack the writer open, I can only imagine his inner depths and shallows. I am more concerned with this imagined depth than with truth.

And, since the only way to distinguish style from substance is in my imagination, I just write stuff using a forceful tone. In specific cases, I'll appropriate 'academic' language to mystify others and strengthen my substance. I can even describe myself as a 'transpecies otherkin system', because it's like the magic phrases successfully employed by real feminists and antiracists. I can take their magic words and become empowered too.

My thinking is not based on a coherent ethicopolitical framework, but whatever. Can anything really mean anything anyways? That's the sort of thing a powerful, authoritative thinker would ask, and this bullshit is as good as truth to me. I am more concerned with power than with truth.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 04:21:57 PM
Brooklyn Bruiser

(http://i.imgur.com/nhiacb2.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/ovt19i5.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/RZGmVsU.jpg)


holy shit that twitter of SJW white noise:
http://bklynbruzer.tumblr.com/
(http://i.imgur.com/igXTUIi.png)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 04:28:44 PM
Here he is, trying to :goonlove: with a famous actor:
(http://i.imgur.com/0UhRfuo.jpg)

holy SHIT those mantits
(http://i.imgur.com/QOjnfmY.jpg)

His 'at least I'm not Aran' face
(http://i.imgur.com/Uu898mP.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Mullah Omar on January 26, 2014, 04:32:07 PM
His name is Robert Paulson.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 04:51:30 PM
hahahahahahahahahh
(http://i.imgur.com/YMPEdzG.jpg)

Look how uncomfortable these motherfuckers are to be seen with that guy. No wonder he'd put two pictures with minorities on his okcupid (coworkers and random people) because that's the only time his pasty white brooklyn ass ever interacts with them.

(http://i.imgur.com/IcHF0Cf.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/lQheN0b.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/wdM26Fw.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/xXn2kFf.jpg)

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on January 26, 2014, 04:52:34 PM
every person he takes a picture with looks like a hostage
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ozmas Eggplant on January 26, 2014, 04:53:03 PM
It looks like he has a tumor on his chin jesus christ so fucking ugly and fat
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on January 26, 2014, 04:53:31 PM
Richard Lewis looks so fucking uncomfortable there
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 04:53:58 PM
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/BklynBruzer?cf=profile
(http://i.imgur.com/jIuerxi.png)

:stare:
(http://i.imgur.com/KTKN1s1.png)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 26, 2014, 04:55:29 PM
From that permagrin you'd almost think he had anything to be smug about.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 26, 2014, 04:57:32 PM
hahahahaha you're doing the lords work here cis scum.  :nixon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Red Wine at Night, Ambien Delight on January 26, 2014, 04:58:21 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/C7KWMEV.png)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 04:58:50 PM
On his love of Bruce Springsteen:
Quote from: OKCupid profile
His "Born to Run" album feels like the soundtrack to my life sometimes

(http://i.imgur.com/C7KWMEV.png)

Please please please let's make this into :diabetes:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 05:13:59 PM
every person he takes a picture with looks like a hostage

i have no idea what you'r
(http://i.imgur.com/6wtgin5.jpg?1)

:stewart:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on January 26, 2014, 05:23:47 PM
at least he's honest in his okcupid profile about being overweight
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 26, 2014, 05:26:48 PM
at least he's honest in his okcupid profile about being overweight

He should still say he has literal tits because of it though:
(http://i.imgur.com/QOjnfmY.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 05:27:27 PM
^^^^ This is Keith Olbermann by the way, if the massive tits are taking that away from you


Yeah. Turns out he also wasn't such a wonderful feminist and sjw:

(http://i.imgur.com/buiXrEu.png)

I love that he only has one entry, and it starts with "butter" (like everything else he does, it always starts with butter).
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on January 26, 2014, 05:31:59 PM
Hardwick looks like there is a gun being held against his back.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on January 26, 2014, 05:41:58 PM
^^^^ This is Keith Olbermann by the way, if the massive tits are taking that away from you


Yeah. Turns out he also wasn't such a wonderful feminist and sjw:

(http://i.imgur.com/buiXrEu.png)

I love that he only has one entry, and it starts with "butter" (like everything else he does, it always starts with butter).

how feminist of him
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 06:00:21 PM
how feminist of him

Such a feminist he has hundreds of posts on a board called "Celebrity Sex Stories Archive". Read here about how he'd love to masturbate to Jessica and Ashley Simpson incest lesbian porn, for example:

http://board.c-s-s-a.com/index.php?topic=7622.5
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ozmas Eggplant on January 26, 2014, 06:06:31 PM
how feminist of him

Such a feminist he has hundreds of posts on a board called "Celebrity Sex Stories Archive". Read here about how he'd love to masturbate to Jessica and Ashley Simpson incest lesbian porn, for example:

http://board.c-s-s-a.com/index.php?topic=7622.5

hahah holy fuckkkkkk

every sjw is a closet freak
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Red Wine at Night, Ambien Delight on January 26, 2014, 06:07:39 PM
how feminist of him

Such a feminist he has hundreds of posts on a board called "Celebrity Sex Stories Archive". Read here about how he'd love to masturbate to Jessica and Ashley Simpson incest lesbian porn, for example:

http://board.c-s-s-a.com/index.php?topic=7622.5

hahah holy fuckkkkkk

every sjw is a closet freak

I'm tempted to buy an account and post that in his hugbox
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: sub-base turf sniffing boner diarist on January 26, 2014, 06:17:01 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/C7KWMEV.png)

Mr. Potato Head really let himself go.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on January 26, 2014, 06:58:16 PM
fat sack of shit identifies born to run as the soundtrack to his life   :rock:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: sub-base turf sniffing boner diarist on January 26, 2014, 07:02:20 PM
Born to Waddle (Wheezing Gasp Remix)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 26, 2014, 09:21:13 PM
^^^^ This is Keith Olbermann by the way, if the massive tits are taking that away from you


Yeah. Turns out he also wasn't such a wonderful feminist and sjw:

(http://i.imgur.com/buiXrEu.png)

I love that he only has one entry, and it starts with "butter" (like everything else he does, it always starts with butter).
how feminist of him

Such a feminist he has hundreds of posts on a board called "Celebrity Sex Stories Archive". Read here about how he'd love to masturbate to Jessica and Ashley Simpson incest lesbian porn, for example:

http://board.c-s-s-a.com/index.php?topic=7622.5

Hahaha oh my god.

After Aatrek nothing about people's online recklessness should surprise me, but how goddamn stupid do you have to be to use the same, very unique, highly Googlable username for public social media and for a goddamn porn forum?

We need to find a way to access that site, BTW. Registration is disabled, and fatso here has 439 posts in that forum. I'd bet my ass there are some even more embarrassing posts in some non-publicly-visible board.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 26, 2014, 09:24:19 PM
Oh man, wish I could see your face about 30 seconds after you posted that and refreshed gbs 2.1.3 :stewart:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 26, 2014, 09:54:30 PM
Oh man, wish I could see your face about 30 seconds after you posted that and refreshed gbs 2.1.3 :stewart:

Yeah, I saw the main thread now. Great work :reagan:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on January 27, 2014, 04:33:32 AM
Remember this incredibly bad post made by Vargo in the rules thread of CineD?

saving those posts for posterity
(http://i.imgur.com/GhXNeTW.png)

Apparently our pal ClemenSalad made him feel a bit too self conscious about it, he edited/changed it:

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3462469&pagenumber=1#post424595653
Quote from: Vargo
You know what? Here's a new rule. Let's just go with a general "Don't be a creep" rule. This means don't act like an actress' breasts are a seperate person, don't obsess over whether a woman's body is "right" to play a superhero, don't say that women could stand to lose a few pounds, make ironic sexist remarks at your own risk, basic simple stuff. (Don't tell us what you masturbate to.)

If you want to say how good-looking an actress or actor is, go ahead, but don't be a creep about it, and at least try to have something else mor substantial to contribute to the discussion.

Still a faggot, but less of an autistic faggot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aatrekvictim on January 27, 2014, 06:38:17 AM
nice work with bruiser - divisionpost should be next, he might actually be even faggier
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on January 28, 2014, 12:46:18 PM
Quote from: Senior Woodchuck" post="424916315
So, you don't mention the whole "brother 'vetting' his sister's boyfriend to see if he's worthy of marrying her is so fucking sexist" part of Ride-Along because it's a given, right?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 28, 2014, 02:21:23 PM
Quote from: Senior Woodchuck" post="424916315
So, you don't mention the whole "brother 'vetting' his sister's boyfriend to see if he's worthy of marrying her is so fucking sexist" part of Ride-Along because it's a given, right?

hahaha what the fuck :tuss:

How can someone who doesn't even understand basic human interactions can be in charge of taking care of people, even if it's just a gay internet forum?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on January 28, 2014, 02:38:32 PM
Quote from: Senior Woodchuck" post="424916315
So, you don't mention the whole "brother 'vetting' his sister's boyfriend to see if he's worthy of marrying her is so fucking sexist" part of Ride-Along because it's a given, right?

hahaha what the fuck :tuss:

How can someone who doesn't even understand basic human interactions can be in charge of taking care of people, even if it's just a gay internet forum?

Ambien is a hell of a drug.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: HondaRider271 on January 28, 2014, 03:00:59 PM
Quote from: Senior Woodchuck" post="424916315
So, you don't mention the whole "brother 'vetting' his sister's boyfriend to see if he's worthy of marrying her is so fucking sexist" part of Ride-Along because it's a given, right?
Hahaha wow the cognitive dissonance here is... well it's palpable.

So families are supposed to have absolutely no impact on their immediate family member's life decisions. What about the all-too-common phenomenon of domestic/spousal abuse, where the woman is too afraid to speak up so it's up to friends/family to intervene? What about when siblings are not equally intelligent, and it has nothing to do with gender but just boils down to genetic lottery? What if the brother is a well-educated, high-IQ responsible adult, and the sister is well-intentioned but airheaded? She could easily be taken advantage of by manipulative people, and often it's up to the family to prevent that from happening (or stop it when it goes too far).

I guess that's totally cool because ~~equal rights~~
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 30, 2014, 06:31:13 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/6DNHUxB.png)

Look who deleted his fetlife account right after the doxx dropped :stewart:

It makes the 'I'm not into rape and torture anymore, I got therapy and now I'm a lot better" claims harder to believe when we find out you have a fetlife profile where your picture is recent (and with your coworkers lol).

also hahahaha who the fuck is so stupid they use their main account name for their fetlife account? he was begging to be caught. maybe that's what he's into :adam:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on January 30, 2014, 06:57:35 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/6DNHUxB.png)

Look who deleted his fetlife account right after the doxx dropped :stewart:

It makes the 'I'm not into rape and torture anymore, I got therapy and now I'm a lot better" claims harder to believe when we find out you have a fetlife profile where your picture is recent (and with your coworkers lol).

also hahahaha who the fuck is so stupid they use their main account name for their fetlife account? he was begging to be caught. maybe that's what he's into :adam:

He kept on telling us he was only into this stuff when he was younger and he outgrew that. How much younger, BrooklynBruiser? One week younger? You were still engaged with this shit right up until you were called out on it. Did your other nanna have to die before you decided to delete this one too? Jesus fucking christ, dude.

 :diabetes:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on January 30, 2014, 07:24:47 PM

Quote from: Vargo
You know what? Here's a new rule. Let's just go with a general "Don't be a creep" rule. This means don't act like an actress' breasts are a seperate person, don't obsess over whether a woman's body is "right" to play a superhero, don't say that women could stand to lose a few pounds, make ironic sexist remarks at your own risk, basic simple stuff. (Don't tell us what you masturbate to.)

If you want to say how good-looking an actress or actor is, go ahead, but don't be a creep about it, and at least try to have something else mor substantial to contribute to the discussion.

Still a faggot, but less of an autistic faggot.

Wow who let this 4chan speak moron on these forums? Talking about womyn too, possible secret MRA???Mods?????
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on January 30, 2014, 08:37:39 PM

Quote from: Vargo
You know what? Here's a new rule. Let's just go with a general "Don't be a creep" rule. This means don't act like an actress' breasts are a seperate person, don't obsess over whether a woman's body is "right" to play a superhero, don't say that women could stand to lose a few pounds, make ironic sexist remarks at your own risk, basic simple stuff. (Don't tell us what you masturbate to.)

If you want to say how good-looking an actress or actor is, go ahead, but don't be a creep about it, and at least try to have something else mor substantial to contribute to the discussion.


Jesus fucking Christ.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on February 01, 2014, 11:56:24 PM
Hey remember that Mouse Hunt movie from the 90s? you know, about the two guys who own a string factory and get into looney tunes shenanigans trying to kill a mouse?  you owe it to yourself to watch it again, cause whoo boy you missed some serious heavy duty ~*subtext*~

Quote from: an autist
While I agree that the cinematography and fluid momentum of the film are top-notch, I think you missed the whole political subtext of the story; Minorities Causing the Downfall of America.

Quote from: another autist
The Smuntz family is essentially a metaphor for post WW1 Germany here. The deceased father is the kaiser. The factory is the devastated German economy and the workers it’s elderly and depleted workforce. The last will and testament of the father is what is left after the treaty of Versailles.

Quote from: jesus 888 christ
Conclusion

Some may watch the film and see little more than Verbinski’s signature kinetic cinematography and a script tailor made for cheap laughs for an American audience high off the irrational exuberance of the 1990s. A film for the whole family to enjoy.

But look further and you will see a lovingly made tale created by the Jewish community to act as a parable for the horrors their people faced during the first half of the 20th century.
                  /
:goon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on February 02, 2014, 07:28:18 AM
Goon delusion #257: "I am smart and I enjoy this movie. Since smart people only enjoy smart things, this movie must be really deep too!"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on February 02, 2014, 07:52:20 AM
Fairly sure the dude's deliberately reading waaaay too much into it in an attempt at comedy, chaps.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on February 02, 2014, 05:33:55 PM
Fairly sure the dude's deliberately reading waaaay too much into it in an attempt at comedy, chaps.

Poe's law, etc
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 12, 2014, 06:41:22 PM
Here is your reminder that Division Post is a cowardly cocksucker who organizes IRC raids on threads and posters he doesn't like (thanks for the anonymous screencaps and logs. Please keep them coming all of you who hate those fucking manchildren who try to stamp out anyone who doesn't agree with them)
Before we go further, another reminder: Division Post is a huge friend of :diabetes: who saw nothing wrong with the Doxx and was really angry his friend was run out, so in all likelyhood he's another sick freak who gets off on women being tortured. Not a surprise considering how much he loves to gang up on one unsuspecting victim with his friends.

(http://i.imgur.com/LDRwTVn.png?1)

Here is the post in question:
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?noseen=0&threadid=3570727&perpage=40&pagenumber=28
Quote from: soapgish" post="425646289
I'm loving the show but the overt racism is a bit off-putting. That may seem like an Opposite Day statement but the depiction of Caucasians is blatantly negative as two of the three, Hitchcock and Scully, are completely inept in all ways and exist purely to be made fun of. The third, the Vulture, makes a living by profiting off the stolen hard work of our black, Hispanic, Jewish, and Italian protagonists.

Hopefully, down the line, this will be remedied as it's a fantastic program which handles the rest of its diversity exceptionally well.

when he read that (he's always online in their IRC channel apparently and just reads TVIV all day like any spergy retard with no life) he posted that quote above. Here is the pile-on:

Quote from: Brock Samson" post="425646918
The fuck
Quote from: Max22" post="425646976
(http://i.imgur.com/0qjZ9Ee.gif)
Quote from: DivisionPost" post="425646982
Okay, before we go any further, this post isn't meant to be taken literally, is it?
Quote from: CAPTAIN CAPSLOCK" post="425647217
Source your quotes.
Quote from: tin can made man" post="425647500
It's 2014; Italian people are white, now

e: Jewish people too, maybe

e2: Andy Samberg is the star of a Fox show and the leader of a joke rap collective so he is DEFINITELY white
Quote from: TheWevel" post="425647507
God help us if there are any rape jokes in this show.
Quote from: double negative" post="425647492
You know what the toughest part about being a straight, white male is?
Quote from: ChickenMedium" post="425647670
The show features no positive portrayals of Scandinavian-Americans! THIS IS AN OUUUUUUUTRAAAAAAAAAGE!

Then Soapgish replied
Quote from: soapgish" post="425647682
I get that a not-small portion of people consider "whites" to be some scourge to an otherwise wonderful world, but Caucasians, in all their various origins, do deserve a place amongst the other races, and a positive portrayal in that diversity. BROOKLYN NINE-NINE simply has gone the opposite way with that. Everything else it does with race relations, sexuality, etc. is great but for that one thing. And I think to scoff at such a sentiment is prejudiced.

If this creates a dialogue that's dandy, but I can't elaborate any more than to say simply that I look forward to the show having a Caucasian that is competent and a good person as so far it has had neither.

and the IRC raid was about to continue, as he uses his irc admin position to keep people excited and piling on
(http://i.imgur.com/FKSyO9K.png?1)
but Deadpool jumped in the thread and told everyone to shut the fuck up.

And just in case you were thinking "well maybe he just really thought it was a stupid post and shared it, i mean that's what we do here":
(http://i.imgur.com/rTv0qox.png?1)
:lolno:
cowardly mothercucker is as cowardly as motherfuckers goes

here is a pastebin log of what happened:
http://pastebin.com/KEWNUTMj

also includes grown ass men bitching that disney princesses are not black ever :lilal:



edit: as a bonus, on the previous page he and xeria also piled on twee because he apparently mixed up a latin last name with another (they are not spergy, they just hate him)

what a huge faggot. someone (maybe the same person?) also sent me logs where he sent people to pile into threads but said he wouldn't because he wants to keep a clean rap sheet :lolno:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on February 12, 2014, 06:53:05 PM
 :ultlibrage: "How dare he notice that our most hallowed and progressive TV shows are actually hypocritical and exclusive, HOW DARE HE!"

 :diabetes: "Wow, just wow"

 :goon: "Thank goodness our good Modsire put an end to that problematic and potentially toxic tripe, that conversation could lead nowhere good"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 12, 2014, 07:20:47 PM
lol i got three pms this time, two anonymous

First one was:
Quote
<DivisionPost> Hey, I need to say something. The reasons why…a few people can guess, but something was brought to my attention and I want to talk about it.
<DivisionPost> I've been using this IRC to vent about posters I don't like for whatever reason. In doing so, I've encouraged other people in here to pile on.
<DivisionPost> This is really shitty behavior from me, and while there's nobody in here to apologize to, I still want to acknowledge that it's a personal failing and I resolve to be better about it.
<DivisionPost> In the meantime, next time I do something like this, you don't have to take any cues from me.
<DivisionPost> The people who brought it up called it cowardly behavior and I'm inclined to agree.


I wondered how he knew that quickly I mean like 5 minutes later it made its way to DP and he apologized publicly about his behavior and conceded it was shameful (good on him, I suppose). I wonder how he got that information so quickly though.

Then I got the second pm with the full log:


Quote
*** Aran [Samus_Aran@Walking.On.Sunshine] has joined #satviv
<Zaggitz> remember at christmas when that one relative got you megablocks instead of legos
<Zaggitz> and you wanted to fucking kill them
<xeria> mega bloks were bullshit
<IRQ> yeah I;ve already pretty much decided, fuck it, I'm staying home tomorrow
<Aran> None of my relatives would have been dumb enough to get me MegaBloks over LEGO.
<Zaggitz> i once got a megablock tank and its the only time ive had to use glue while building cause all the pieces were so shitty they would fall off immediatly
<Aran> I owned one MegaBloks set in my life, it was a viking ship that I got for ~$6 at Hills in their clearance section because the box was damaged. It was pretty big but the quality was as you expect.
<xeria> i guess i should pack or whatever
<Zaggitz> i did like knex tho
<Zaggitz> but that was way different from lego
<Aran> Hills went out of business in 1998. Yikes.
<Aran> They're trying to compete with Lego now though, they have blocks to go with their sets
<Zaggitz> huh
<Zaggitz> hopefully their blocks are actually useable
<Aran> I have the Big Ball Factory and Hyperspace Training Tower still, I should get them out of storage and annoy the cats
<Zaggitz> i had the big ass crane
<sahn-> I still wait for the day my nephews are old enough to appreciate my old lego collection
<Aran> I'm old enough to appreciate it, let me ... keep it safe for them.
<DivisionPost> Hey, I need to say something. The reasons why…a few people can guess, but something was brought to my attention and I want to talk about it.
<DivisionPost> I've been using this IRC to vent about posters I don't like for whatever reason. In doing so, I've encouraged other people in here to pile on.
*** Zaggitz left #satviv []
<DivisionPost> This is really shitty behavior from me, and while there's nobody in here to apologize to, I still want to acknowledge that it's a personal failing and I resolve to be better about it.
<IRQ> too late, I'm doxxing you as we speak!
<IRQ> I actually have no idea what you're talking about
<DivisionPost> In the meantime, next time I do something like this, you don't have to take any cues from me.
<sahn-> they're 4 and 2 and are still drawing people with massive penises and also spikes coming out of their head
<sahn-> they call them "bean spikes"
<sahn-> why?
<sahn-> I have no fucking idea
<Aran> The first thing the internet was used for was sharing scientific data between research locations. I'm pretty sure the second thing it was used for was shitting on someone else from long-distance, and encouraging others to join in.
<Aran> If not the second, it came along pretty soon.
<IRQ> the third, porn
<DivisionPost> Eh, still. The people who brought it up called it cowardly behavior and I'm inclined to agree.

.... fucking aran, you shameful faggot :lolno:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rape priviledge on February 12, 2014, 07:24:49 PM
We stand here in judgment of Aran.

Evidence: he posts on IRC

Therefore

Verdict: faggot

As for all the other shit I don't know what it means

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on February 12, 2014, 07:28:43 PM
lol i got three pms this time, two anonymous



Quote
*** Aran [Samus_Aran@Walking.On.Sunshine] has joined #satviv

.... fucking ARAN. You shameful faggot motherfucker.

 :lolno: at this fatbody walking on anything as insubstantial as sunshine
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: bigperm on February 12, 2014, 07:33:01 PM
Of course he starts sperging about legos as soon as he joins in.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on February 12, 2014, 07:34:57 PM
THE TOPIC WAS LEGO WHEN I DROPPED IN, GOD.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 12, 2014, 07:37:11 PM
it's like you're midas but with lego the second you enter the room everyone starts talking about legos against their own will
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on February 12, 2014, 07:42:34 PM
I don't think Midas made people talk about gold
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on February 12, 2014, 07:44:19 PM
THE TOPIC WAS LEGO WHEN I DROPPED IN, GOD.

Do you have a Lego alert for IRC?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on February 12, 2014, 07:57:09 PM
If there were such a thing I probably wouldn't.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on February 12, 2014, 08:26:54 PM
We stand here in judgment of Aran.

Evidence: he posts on IRC

Therefore

Verdict: faggot

As for all the other shit I don't know what it means

SASS used IRC for a loooooong fucking time. :jesse:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on February 12, 2014, 09:41:32 PM
All is faggot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on February 13, 2014, 08:05:25 AM
All is faggot.

Nah, just you. And maybe Rocket.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 23, 2014, 11:32:54 AM
TVIV superstar Rarity

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdOCTD0U6FY
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on February 23, 2014, 11:35:16 AM
 :stonk:

Jesus christ what the fuck is wrong with its speech

What the fuck is frong with its face 

What the fuck is wrong with it
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on February 23, 2014, 11:42:24 AM
What the fuck is frong with its face 

No sir, I don't like it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: jesusjuice on February 23, 2014, 11:44:07 AM
So I thought that was a transsexual at first, but after watching 30 seconds of it I just don't know.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Mullah Omar on February 23, 2014, 11:45:34 AM
What the fuck is frong with its face
 
What the fuck is wrong with it
H.R.T. Lovecraft
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on February 23, 2014, 12:00:03 PM
So I thought that was a transsexual at first, but after watching 30 seconds of it I just don't know.

That is absolutely a tranny hooker/stripper.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Renegade Jew on February 23, 2014, 12:10:26 PM
Just in case you forgot what Rarity looks like:

(http://i.imgur.com/1E62bqi.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/u5gpidf.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/W5pSqWm.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/spQAlrn.jpg?1)

(http://i.imgur.com/Zv4Bi2U.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/lNAtCSu.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/d8UEuIa.jpg)

also nsfw for his fake breasts.
http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

:stonk:

:lolno:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hyperbole on February 23, 2014, 12:31:36 PM
Odo still hasn't got the human form quite right!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on February 23, 2014, 12:36:56 PM
There's horse face and then there's that... thing.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 23, 2014, 02:03:59 PM
also rarity is a huge brony and into ponies. truly the embodiement of

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTs_TZFjbJ8
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Troon Tasting Room on February 23, 2014, 02:13:56 PM
lmao those tits, jesus
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rape priviledge on February 23, 2014, 04:00:04 PM
:stonk:

Jesus christ what the fuck is wrong with its speech

What the fuck is frong with its face 

What the fuck is wrong with it

She's English
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: VFW on February 23, 2014, 04:01:20 PM
:stonk:

Jesus christ what the fuck is wrong with its speech

What the fuck is frong with its face 

What the fuck is wrong with it

It's English
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on February 23, 2014, 05:41:59 PM
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nig Disliker on February 23, 2014, 05:51:36 PM
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

British chicks are fucking ugly.  She isn't that far off from the norm over there.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Professor of Niggerology on February 23, 2014, 06:21:54 PM
:stonk:

Jesus christ what the fuck is wrong with its speech

What the fuck is frong with its face 

What the fuck is wrong with it

She's English
still sounds fucking retarded
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on February 23, 2014, 06:22:17 PM
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

...seriously?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 23, 2014, 06:27:43 PM
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

(http://i.imgur.com/oG5Ctkf.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: professional lurker on February 23, 2014, 06:30:20 PM
TVIV superstar Rarity

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdOCTD0U6FY

As an aside, I had to go do court observation for class one week and it was when gold dust got arrested for domestic violence for beating his wife and I was the only person in the courtroom who knew or cared who he was.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on February 23, 2014, 09:05:08 PM
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

Poorly-distilled moonshine still containing at least 10ml of methanol?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on February 23, 2014, 09:25:50 PM
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

You must be blind.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on February 24, 2014, 07:28:31 AM
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

British chicks are fucking ugly.  She isn't that far off from the norm over there.

HE, but yeah.

At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

...seriously?
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

(http://i.imgur.com/oG5Ctkf.jpg)
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

Poorly-distilled moonshine still containing at least 10ml of methanol?
At least with Rarity, I could see a scenario where a guy may be drunk enough to buy it.

You must be blind.

Y'all realize he's making a ton of money working as a prostitute already as it is, right?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on February 24, 2014, 09:47:03 AM
I'm trying to wrap my mind around a troon sjw wearing a tshirt with a Coca Cola logo emblazoned with the American Flag.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Procrustes on February 24, 2014, 10:13:24 AM
888 is a tranny chaser  :stonk:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on February 24, 2014, 11:38:10 AM
Stop calling it a she just because it has fake tits you fucking sexless nerds.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on February 24, 2014, 11:44:12 AM
Speaking of sexless nerds, apparently you can't even sperg about starship classes on the Star Trek thread without being subjected to SJW preaching:

Quote
Sorry I exploded, Tony, by the way. It's like Bicyclops said - nerd culture can be infamously shitty to women and/or minorities and so I get kinda testy when I think those attitudes are being perpetuated unchallenged. I misrepresented your argument and made assumptions about you that weren't accurate and that was crummy of me to do.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on February 24, 2014, 12:47:23 PM
Lol did someone dare say a woman/tranny was wrong?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 24, 2014, 02:03:21 PM
Quote from: -Blackadder-" post="425862804
I generally agree with this, especially lamenting the fact that Andrea and Tyreese's characters were fucked over pretty hard and it's a shame. And considering that Daryl pretty much is the show version of comic Andrea in nearly every way save gender and using a crossbow instead of a rifle, it's hard to argue the other point as well. However I think a big part of the problem, wasn't just Daryl, it was also that the writers were just not comfortable writing black or female characters. I made this point earlier in the thread (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3574296&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=146#post422717486), but if you look at just the first two seasons the treatment of the black and female characters is so fucking obnoxious you almost believe it's meant to be a parody. And then there's Michonne in season 3. I still remember goons live posting "USE YOUR WORDS!!" every time she was on screen. Apparently intersectionality makes you a mute.

Say what you will about the writing in the comics, it certainly deserves a lot of the ridicule, but the portrayal of black and female characters in the comics is literally fucking LIGHT YEARS ahead of the show. Compared to comic Andrea, show Andrea was an absolute fucking travesty.

Quote from: Naet" post="425875731
This. The entire season spent at Hershel's farm was a clinic on how to write terrible women. There's literally a scene where the women go to the kitchen to fix food while the men debate the proper course of action. It's bizarre.

Quote from: Super Ninja Fish" post="425883720
Remember when Lori is telling Andrea "The men don't you need you.  They can handle this on their own.  You're selfish for not helping us cook, clean, and do laundry."  That was the worst.

I'm doing a rewatch this week and I'm finding Andrea much more likable now than I did the first time around and finding Lori a lot more unlikable.

goons manage to bring up INTERSECTIONALITY in a thread about a zombie tv show. they go on about that shit all the time.

you would think they'd realize that if a tv show's writing is shit 100% of the time, then maybe if the women character are also shit it's not because patriarchy and hatred of women.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on February 24, 2014, 02:36:25 PM
Assuming this is the Walking Dead, I've seen one episode. I saw nothing but children, men, women, black, white, and asian people with weapons trying not to die :rolleyes:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on February 24, 2014, 02:37:06 PM
They do this shit with every show; it's a forum full of fucking oddballs. Even when you have someone like the dude that wrote BSG or those Lost clowns saying they pulled most of that drivel out of their asses like the day before they filmed it and without giving a fuck because idiots will watch any old shite and convince each other of how awesome it is, goons manage to see layers and sublayers of meaning and double meaning and subtext in even the most anodyne TV horsehit the writers shat out in half an hour while pregaming and high. And if they're not doing that then they're talking about how whatever show it is is literally epoch-defining seminal televisual gold and how they had to watch the episode again right after because that Raylan Givens' quip is LITERALLY one of the greatest lines ever uttered in the history of the visual medium and it moved me to tears and really made me contemplate my existence and how this made me realise a good thesis idea would be How Justified's Portrayal Of The Socioeconomic Reality Of Kentucky Is A Metaphor For flknceawcerboijlhnerbpoiherbpokbber *fart*

Seriously, there are like two shows they don't like and everything else is A1 10/10 John Logie Baird Award for Best Ever Show with Best Written Characters Ever.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on February 24, 2014, 02:47:45 PM
I stopped watching that show when they introduced a black woman with katanas that had the opposite of the gift of gab. Bitch was a straight up mute and could have alleviated some problems if she just opened her mouth.  And she had jawless, armless, nigger zombies in chains she would march around as camouflage.

Completely unrelated but True Detective is a pro download or if you have HBO set your DVR.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on February 24, 2014, 02:53:22 PM
I had to rewatch the latest episode of True Detective when I was done watching it, but that was because there was a good bit of that hot chick mostly to completely naked.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on February 24, 2014, 02:56:22 PM
I already put True Detective above The Sopranos for the tits in episode 2. There won't be a better pair of tits on TV all year and we're not even out of February.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on February 24, 2014, 03:02:43 PM
If noone knows who we are talking about it's the rich chick from It's Always Sunny when charlie tricks her into falling for him so he can make the waitress jealous.

Alexandra Daddario. A+ titties

edit: Let's not get crazy it goes Sopranos>The Wire>Breaking Bad>Game of Thrones>Boardwalk Empire>Deadwood and we will see how True Detective turns out. Generation Kill is in there somewhere too.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on February 24, 2014, 03:09:09 PM
https://imgur.com/a/qIEya

A round of applause for the internet, please.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on February 24, 2014, 03:11:14 PM
And even in the true detective thread you get tone-deaf faggots who think because the writers name-drop a cosmic horror story then it's entirely plausible a show about man's inhumanity to man is going to have the characters gunning down shoggoths in r'yleh by the season finale. You cant make this shit up
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on February 24, 2014, 03:14:55 PM
I skimmed through the True Detective thread in TVIV to explicitly look for anyone posting about those titties. Not a one. So that means they are all faggots or Vargo has that place on lock and they are posting like a dog beaten so much they flinch whenever you go to pet it.

edit:

Here are some choice quotes from the OP regarding the show

Quote
The show stars known actoring people Woody Harrelson and Matthew McConaughey as detectives Martin Hart and Rust Cohle (yes, Rust Cohle) respectively, called in in 2012 to discuss a bizarre ritualistic murder they supposedly solved in 1995. Michelle Monaghan plays Hart's wife (in what will probably be a pretty thankless role because this is meant to be a very Manly Manly Men series),

Well who gives a fuck. Maybe this will be a better show if Woody Harrelson were the stay at home dad and Michelle Monaghan was McConaughey's seen-it-all, southern drawl partner.  :lolno:

Quote
So the general consensus is that it's another male antihero-ish drama but still good enough to stand out. Only a few hours away. Prepare yourselves.

Why does this need to be brought up?  I plan on reading the whole thread once I catch up to all the episodes since I'm only on episode 3. I bet there's outrage that there are no female CID detectives and they have a black woman that fetches Woody Harrelson coffee every morning.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on February 24, 2014, 03:19:53 PM
There were a few posts about them after the episode aired but thankfully i only counted one broken faggot who posted 'um excuse me but can we not talk about her mammaries please :christina:'
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 24, 2014, 03:22:41 PM
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/9eec27e97cf397152efa6e3fe42f26e2/tumblr_mgttkjQMh11s2fr8jo1_500.gif)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on February 24, 2014, 03:23:52 PM
Quote from: Naet" post="425875731
This. The entire season spent at Hershel's farm was a clinic on how to write terrible women. There's literally a scene where the women go to the kitchen to fix food while the men debate the proper course of action. It's bizarre.

That's because it takes place in the South. :colbert:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 24, 2014, 03:43:37 PM
are any of them in long term relationships or married, and mostly friends with others who are in relationships or married? because that scenario happens a fuck ton to me and everyone i know
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on February 24, 2014, 03:52:08 PM
https://imgur.com/a/qIEya

A round of applause for the internet, please.

Those are some nice fucking tits.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 24, 2014, 03:57:05 PM
is that woody harrelson eating ass on tv?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on February 24, 2014, 03:59:37 PM
no it's Ted Danson
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on February 24, 2014, 04:17:48 PM

It's John Ratzenberger.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on February 24, 2014, 06:04:42 PM
the true detective thread turned to complete shit with thousands of crazy words written about the impenetrable motivations of a woman fucking her husbands friend after he cheated on her repeatedly and why a guy would fuck a hot woman who throws herself at him

a taste:

Quote from: steakmancer
The Rust-Maggie scene was the one actual scene from this show that wasn't amazing and tone-perfect for the situation and contained such an uncharacteristic series of actions from Rust that has really soured the last 2 episodes for me.

I get where Maggie is coming from and an erotic confrontation between her and Rust seemed like a cliched, inevitable scene that I really didn't want to see, but the scene seemed chiefly to fill in the stilted, absurdly short HBO sex scene quota for a popular series, with proper character development fitting the bill.

I'm not ungrateful for the Monaghan and McConaughey butt but several thresholds of character misbehaviour were crossed for reasons I don't really understand:

1) Rust consenting in the first place - Rust ate Maggie's confession head on before her thong even dropped so pouring some of her wine and dropping trough obligingly seems really unfathomable.

2) Rust fucking finishing inside Maggie - Ok, maybe Rust's lizard brain got the best of him and Michelle Monaghan is smoking hot but coital interruption is totally out of the question for the most cerebral, sane (according to him earlier in the episode) detective on the show? Also really the hallmark of HBO sex scene design is on display as he fucking busts his nut in 10 seconds (not that I could go further) from the ravenous, sensual foreplay of Maggie talking about how she almost fucked a stranger in a bar and her forcing herself on Rust's neck for the same duration.

3) Rust exploding (post-testicular explosion) at Maggie - This is sort of the most understandable response to the totally outrageous events it proceeds, I imagine Rust feels pretty bad about himself for not bringing his A-game to Maggie so he shoves her out the door to play with his Mag-Lite some more.

I mean if this is all of Rust's keikaku for some Sherlock-esque Marty manipulation to bust the Tuttle Illuminati two weeks from now I'll laugh at the response I had today but that scene was super fucking dumb.

a few people called him a nerd but then it turned into a discussion of how every woman in movies or tv is written as a frigid vindictive bitch who doesnt pass the bechdel test or some shit

Quote from: great enoch
It does seem a massive shame that a show that's otherwise better than most on gender relations and sexual politics doesn't really have any successful female characters

because a show about 2 homicide detectives tracking a serial killer should sidestep the plot to shoehorn a female character in the most favorable possible light

i mean there is just page after page of this shit

Quote from: wax lion
This was exactly my problem with the scene. Maggie's agency comes from her vagina. And judging from the creator's comments he doesn't see that as some sort of commentary on gender politics either. Luckily I love the rest of this show and he's said on twitter he'll be better next year. Edit: Oh and while I can appreciate that they may have intended to make Rust look like a jerk, the whole tableau of her crying and apologizing and him demanding she leave felt like the weight of the show's moral judgment was laid on her and he was essentially her victim. It grossed me out.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on February 24, 2014, 06:24:48 PM
I'm a True Detective lover and to be honest I agree that that scene was shitty writing that didn't match either of the characters at all.

However, that has nothing to do with gender relations, the patriarchy, FEMALE CHARACTERS, the bechddell test, damsel in distress, gender politics, etc. It was just lazy writing.

Quote from: wax lion
This was exactly my problem with the scene. Maggie's agency comes from her vagina. And judging from the creator's comments he doesn't see that as some sort of commentary on gender politics either. Luckily I love the rest of this show and he's said on twitter he'll be better next year. Edit: Oh and while I can appreciate that they may have intended to make Rust look like a jerk, the whole tableau of her crying and apologizing and him demanding she leave felt like the weight of the show's moral judgment was laid on her and he was essentially her victim. It grossed me out.

They were actually pretty fucking careful to demonstrate that Rust was at home getting fucking wasted before she showed up. If you actually believe the feminist bullshit that alcohol and coercion nullify consent then you should practice what you preach and assert that she RAPED Rust, instead of felling "icky" that he was falsely made to look like a victim.

Also it's pretty easy to express these opinions with out saying "keikaku" and "tableau" and a bunch of other tv trope horse shit that people say to sound like intellectuals instead of the reality which is "no-life faggots with zero identity outside of opinions on TV shows"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on February 24, 2014, 06:26:05 PM
I've heard good things and the show def sounds problematic enough that I'll give it a go after the first season's finished.  :nixon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on February 24, 2014, 06:29:43 PM
I couldn't get off because seeing Woody's sexy-type faces while I'm trying to watch a barely legal slut ride a cock really takes me out of the moment.

it's an awesome show tho so I just beat off to porn instead
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on February 24, 2014, 06:38:20 PM
I just don't fucking get goons, man. Maggie doesn't take any shit from Hart, knows him better than he knows himself, is a good mother to her children, doesn't let the two detectives jerk her around, and is generally a competent, intelligent character, but god forbid a woman cry because she cheated on her husband in the heat of the moment (a woman expressing regret for her actions in a story doesn't mean the creators jerk off to the scarlet letter you stupid fucking faggots).

Do these retards have even the slightest inkling of how human beings behave and interact with another? Do they just black out whenever a female character appears and revert to tumblr autopilot mode where they treat every woman on-screen as a stand-in for Oppressed Wymyn Everywhere? Don't they get that these are specific characters, with specific motivations, that serve a specific purpose in a story that has shit to do with "sexual politics"?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on February 24, 2014, 06:39:31 PM
These fucks would probably rage against Band of Brothers and demand to know why Easy Company doesn't have any strong women of color in it's ranks.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on February 24, 2014, 06:41:32 PM
Don't they get that these are specific characters, with specific motivations, that serve a specific purpose in a story that has shit to do with "sexual politics"?

Goons don't give a fuck about the specifics of any character. They just have a "problematic female character" checklist and exercise zero critical thinking to mark off enough squares to justify moral outrage against the patriarchy.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on February 24, 2014, 06:49:57 PM
Dont ever bring up Skylar from Breaking Bad
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on February 24, 2014, 07:10:40 PM
Dont ever bring up Skylar from Breaking Bad
:librage: Skyler cheating on Walt with Ted was totally justified after Walt brutally raped her in the kitchen even before she discovered he was a drug dealer.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on February 24, 2014, 07:45:23 PM
I just don't fucking get goons, man. Maggie doesn't take any shit from Hart, knows him better than he knows himself, is a good mother to her children, doesn't let the two detectives jerk her around, and is generally a competent, intelligent character, but god forbid a woman cry because she cheated on her husband in the heat of the moment (a woman expressing regret for her actions in a story doesn't mean the creators jerk off to the scarlet letter you stupid fucking faggots).

Do these retards have even the slightest inkling of how human beings behave and interact with another? Do they just black out whenever a female character appears and revert to tumblr autopilot mode where they treat every woman on-screen as a stand-in for Oppressed Wymyn Everywhere? Don't they get that these are specific characters, with specific motivations, that serve a specific purpose in a story that has shit to do with "sexual politics"?

Haha you're kidding right?  Of course they have no idea how human beings act.  Half their lives are taken up by vidya games, where they fixate on a badass female character in 2 and a half minutes of cutscenes, and because it's the most they've ever seen a non-actress woman talk in their lives, that is now the touchmark of female existence.

The other half of their lives is either interacting on the internet with an echo chamber of troons and other greasy losers or working in a lowly paid job around the scum of the earth, or if they're lucky a tech job where any normal woman who needs anything from them uses the absolute minimum amount of words possible to get the ridiculous freak out of their hair.  At most they know 1 or 2 "alternative" women who are friendly to them because they're fat, ugly, or legit crazy enough to not be able to attract anyone else and would drop them in a heartbeat if they could, and echo all the craziest feminist speak they hear on the interwebs to the goon because they want to signal to everyone they are not an item.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on February 24, 2014, 07:52:33 PM
I suspect they know how people really act, but behave as though their abstracted reality is valid in a bid to overwrite and reeducate from the one we live in.

That always works out.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on February 24, 2014, 08:31:12 PM
I liked how they were saying how the women and minorities in The Walking Dead were poorly written, instead of everything about it being poorly written.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: mart on February 24, 2014, 08:33:45 PM
Quote
Every single other character in the show even made fun of them for taking it so seriously. The entire premise was that they only investigated it so they could spend time alone and that one of them is likely the actual bandit.

Also the actor who played the "super PTSD victim in a wheelchair" is a rapper who IRL raps about slapping booties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Glover



We have come full circle through the looking glass. Mainstream media is making fun of the SJWs trivial issues and this new emotion other humans know as "humor" is TRIGGERING THEM.

I know this was a while ago but Glover even mocks these people in his songs, here's a couple of lines from one:
Or "I wrote on rape culture my junior year at BrownAnnotate
So I'm allowed to say what all his raps are about"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on February 24, 2014, 08:38:42 PM
They do this shit with every show; it's a forum full of fucking oddballs. Even when you have someone like the dude that wrote BSG or those Lost clowns saying they pulled most of that drivel out of their asses like the day before they filmed it and without giving a fuck because idiots will watch any old shite and convince each other of how awesome it is, goons manage to see layers and sublayers of meaning and double meaning and subtext in even the most anodyne TV horsehit the writers shat out in half an hour while pregaming and high. And if they're not doing that then they're talking about how whatever show it is is literally epoch-defining seminal televisual gold and how they had to watch the episode again right after because that Raylan Givens' quip is LITERALLY one of the greatest lines ever uttered in the history of the visual medium and it moved me to tears and really made me contemplate my existence and how this made me realise a good thesis idea would be How Justified's Portrayal Of The Socioeconomic Reality Of Kentucky Is A Metaphor For flknceawcerboijlhnerbpoiherbpokbber *fart*

Seriously, there are like two shows they don't like and everything else is A1 10/10 John Logie Baird Award for Best Ever Show with Best Written Characters Ever.

The best part of the BSG finale was all the goon rage at the ending.  Goons raged on end that "head Six" and "head Baltar" were actual angels, even though they had said they were the whole fucking time.  The show starts out with them looking for home as written in their religious text.  At first the BRILLIANT LEADERS admit they don't believe it and it's just a way to keep the masses happy.  Then, fairly quickly, it becomes obvious that the religious texts were actually true and the show delves more and more into a religious/spiritual context.

...then surprise surprise the ending continues that trend and there's literally angels amongst them.

Goons were furious there wasn't some deep wonderful message to own those intolerant xians are some shit.

Goons are literally incapable of watching a TV show unless it conforms, 100%, with their politics.  I'm almost convinced that they literally sit in front of the TV with a checklist to make sure their show is SJW enough.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on February 24, 2014, 08:52:06 PM
https://imgur.com/a/qIEya

A round of applause for the internet, please.

Just popping in to say those tits are amazing and everything else on the show is irrelevant to them. That girl also played Kate on White Collar which is a show I sometimes watch.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on February 24, 2014, 09:12:47 PM
Goons are literally incapable of watching a TV show unless it conforms, 100%, with their politics.  I'm almost convinced that they literally sit in front of the TV with a checklist to make sure their show is SJW enough.

This, but it isn't just limited to TV shows either. They do this with movies and books as well. You can't even have a discussion on The Something Awful Forums about great novelists such as J.R.R. Tolken, George R.R. Martin, etc. without some SJW piece of shit coming into the thread hurling huge 888 walls of text claiming that they were/are: Racist, Misogynist, Pedophiles, Capitalist, etc. because of something in their novels that could be interpreted that way if you're actively looking for it. I can't tell you how many threads about LOTR over the years have been ruined from goons literally arguing with a straight face that the historical oppression of niggers is analogous to the oppression of Orcs under Sauron. Or that Tolken suffered from "unconscious" racism and "Eurocentrism" (lol). Or that Asoiaf is a misogynist series, no questions asked. I could go on & on.

Don't even get me started on the shit they do to anyone who doesn't like the character of Skyler on Breaking Bad.

You can't even have a discussion about entertainment or fine arts on those fucking forums without a horde of goons expecting you to interpret everything in it through a left wing or social justice perspective.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on February 24, 2014, 09:22:41 PM

Don't get into Games either. You can't read a thread for five minutes without running into someone literally shaking because one of the protagonists in GTA V isn't a woman, or that Venezuela was portrayed as the enemy in Call of Duty: Ghosts.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on February 24, 2014, 09:23:36 PM
There's a handful of good threads on SA - the McCarthy and David Foster Wallace thread, the ancient history thread, the couple of fine art threads that pop up in A/T from time to time, and I'm sure a few more that I've missed - that are faggotry-free and frequented by really cool and passionate people who know how to communicate that passion really well. Those kinds of goons are the reason SA is only teetering over a precipice but hasn't fallen yet.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on February 24, 2014, 09:38:41 PM

Don't get into Games either. You can't read a thread for five minutes without running into someone literally shaking because one of the protagonists in GTA V isn't a woman, or that Venezuela was portrayed as the enemy in Call of Duty: Ghosts.

It was interesting watching the fighting over Trevor in GTA5.  Half the goons hated him because goonrage, the other half rationalized their loving him because REDNECK LOL
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on February 24, 2014, 09:39:49 PM

Don't get into Games either. You can't read a thread for five minutes without running into someone literally shaking because one of the protagonists in GTA V isn't a woman, or that Venezuela was portrayed as the enemy in Call of Duty: Ghosts.


I'd had enough of the games subforum when goons went on a multipage derail in the dota thread about how this character http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKbv6KOU6cM is sexist and triggering because he makes passes at female characters in his lines.

The macaroni coloured fantasy bat character got more serious attention and energy from these goons more than a steady job ever would.

Here's a list of his ingame dialogue. Whoever can read the whole page without getting triggered wins. http://dota2.gamepedia.com/Batrider_responses
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 24, 2014, 10:46:41 PM
You can't even have a discussion on The Something Awful Forums about great novelists such as J.R.R. Tolken, George R.R. Martin, etc.

as shameful a faggot as a shameful faggot can :lolno:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on February 24, 2014, 11:31:32 PM
they actually think that shit IS discussion
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rape priviledge on February 24, 2014, 11:41:46 PM
You can't even have a discussion on The Something Awful Forums about great novelists such as J.R.R. Tolken, George R.R. Martin, etc. without some SJW piece of shit coming into the thread hurling huge 888 walls of text claiming that they were/are: Racist, Misogynist, Pedophiles, Capitalist, etc.


Sucks you can't discuss the shittiest,gooniest books written with your fellow neckbeards, faggot.

 :lf:



Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on February 24, 2014, 11:48:29 PM
Don't hate on J.K. Rowling & Stephanie Meyer, faggot. Nobody expresses the blossoming of teenage twat like they do. Drink bleach, neat.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MassiveMilitant on February 24, 2014, 11:50:10 PM
You can't even have a discussion on The Something Awful Forums about great novelists such as J.R.R. Tolken, George R.R. Martin, etc. without some SJW piece of shit coming into the thread hurling huge 888 walls of text claiming that they were/are: Racist, Misogynist, Pedophiles, Capitalist, etc.


Sucks you can't discuss the shittiest,gooniest books written with your fellow neckbeards, faggot.

 :lf:

 :nixon: lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Turd Ferguson on February 24, 2014, 11:51:11 PM
Quote from: Icon-Cat" post="426150653
"Ghostbusters" was and is my favorite movie. I was lucky enough to meet Ramis once and tell him how much his work meant to me. He signed my GB DVD. You should have seen the collection of us goony-looking folks, all in a certain age range, lined up for his autograph. Each of us was somehow wearing a _different_ Ghostbusters t-shirt.

Ramis' work didn't just mean a lot to regular fans like you and me, it had an impact on what comedy is like on film and television. SCTV, Animal House, Caddyshack, Ghostbusters, and Groundhog Day — these weren't just enjoyable movies in their own right, they influenced comedic actors and writers in the next generation. The example I like to give is how Ramis was cast as Seth Rogen's father in Knocked Up — just as Judd Apatow feels Ramis paved the way for his own work.



For a couple of years I've been lobbying to get Ghostbusters into the Library of Congress' National Film Registry, without success.

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the film, and that twinned with Ramis' passing has inspired me to redouble my efforts. If you believe, as I do, that "Ghostbusters" is an important part of the history of American film comedy, click below to learn how you can help by (literally) just writing one e-mail. (Slacktivism at its finest!)

http://www.runleiarun.com/ghostbusters/nfr.shtml (http://www.runleiarun.com/ghostbusters/nfr.shtml)


Holy mackerel. I like Ghostbusters too man, but really? Library of Congress?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on February 24, 2014, 11:59:19 PM
At least we'll never have Ghostbusters 3 now! :nixon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Turd Ferguson on February 25, 2014, 12:02:40 AM
That's one of those things that I never could figure out at all. SA fucking LOVES Ghostbusters. It's not a bad movie at all. It's a pretty clever comedy with a bizarre premise that works. The cast is great and they definitely bring their A game. It's just so insane how much they love it. I mean, I know the answer is aspergers and the usual goon fixation on something. I just don't get it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on February 25, 2014, 12:03:59 AM
At least we'll never have Ghostbusters 3 now! :nixon:

There are goons in that thread in CineD talking about how broken up they are and crying over Ramis' death. The guy was funny and contributed plenty to 80s and 90s comedy but God damn. How do 95% of actors/writers/directors warrant any more than a "Damn, that sucks." when they die? These goons act like some of these people are blood relatives.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Turd Ferguson on February 25, 2014, 12:06:11 AM
LITERALLY SHAKING
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on February 25, 2014, 12:30:19 AM
TV/Movies/Games IS reality for goons.  It's all they have.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on February 25, 2014, 12:33:49 AM
At least we'll never have Ghostbusters 3 now! :nixon:

Yo hate to break this to you, but the most recent videogame is to be considered canon aka Ghostbusters 3. And it was pretty fun and funny. Recommended if only for Vigo.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Travis Touchdown 2.0 on February 25, 2014, 02:04:35 AM
That's one of those things that I never could figure out at all. SA fucking LOVES Ghostbusters. It's not a bad movie at all. It's a pretty clever comedy with a bizarre premise that works. The cast is great and they definitely bring their A game. It's just so insane how much they love it. I mean, I know the answer is aspergers and the usual goon fixation on something. I just don't get it.

It was also a cartoon they liked as children and now the movie is a slightly more adult substitute. as with many goon obsessions, it comes down to finding ways to keep liking the same shit you did when you were five well into your thirties

see: 8,000,000 word thesis on transformers

Ghostbusters-induced diabetes also probably fucks with your brain to an extent

(http://i.imgur.com/r6Qd9Px.jpg)

The adolescent Mountain Dew
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on February 25, 2014, 11:05:10 AM
Quote from: Apoplexy" post="426143061
Although I'm a total idiot because I care about anyone if they're a lesbian. Introduce one on The Walking Dead? Guess who's watching just to make sure someone cute and gay survives the apocalypse! Claire's been completely wasted since season 1? I'll watch because she and her girlfriend are cute!

I'll watch complete garbage as long as there are gays in it
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on February 25, 2014, 11:29:10 AM
I'll watch in hopes that stone-cold-carl shoots his faggot cuck dad in the middle of his face like he did his mom.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on February 25, 2014, 07:34:09 PM
last 3-4 pages of the true detective thread are classic goon sjw faggotry

recent episode, not even the last episode, this is a meltdown from two weeks ago:  16 year old daughter of one of the detectives is caught fucking two mid 20s guys, screams fuck you at her dad when he confronts her, so he slaps her and calls her captain of the varsity slut squad

goons storm the thread--many of whom had never posted in the thread at all until this point--to tantrum over  :librage: A MAN :librage:  having the audacity to  :ultlibrage: POLICE THE SEXUALITY OF A WOMAN :ultlibrage:

like, somehow the two counts of statutory rape, a parent's need to discipline their kids, and any rational discussion of what that kind of behavior says about the character and her family life is trumped by NUH UH ITS A WOMAN EXPLORING HER SEXUALITY BIGOTS

i dare you to wade through half a page of that shit
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on February 25, 2014, 08:27:03 PM
lol, yeah, that thread is terrible, so much  :ultlibrage: "FUCK YOU DAD!!! up in that thread. Also, you can really see the goons' passive-aggressive hatred of alpha jock sexhavers come out itt with how on a show with pedophiles, serial killers, and literal baby murderers they still think the cop who drinks and cheats on his wife is the most morally reprehensible character on the show.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on February 25, 2014, 09:35:59 PM
Nothing will beat the amount of  :ultlibrage: that occurred in TVIV when that pregnant girl on Game of Thrones got repeatedly stabbed in the gut. Goons in droves were typing up walls of text about how they were literally throwing shit at their TV's, how "patriarchy" enabled that scene to be aired, how GRRM is a sadist & a pedophile, and that they're done with the show (lol). It was glorious.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 25, 2014, 09:55:27 PM
Nothing will beat the amount of  :ultlibrage: that occurred in TVIV when that pregnant girl on Game of Thrones got repeatedly stabbed in the gut. Goons in droves were typing up walls of text about how they were literally throwing shit at their TV's, how "patriarchy" enabled that scene to be aired, how GRRM is a sadist & a pedophile, and that they're done with the show (lol). It was glorious.

isn't there actual kidfucking in the books? and this is what they get upset over :rolleyes:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: armchair nazi on February 25, 2014, 09:56:56 PM
i thought late term abortions were goon approved?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on February 26, 2014, 09:40:25 AM
Nothing will beat the amount of  :ultlibrage: that occurred in TVIV when that pregnant girl on Game of Thrones got repeatedly stabbed in the gut. Goons in droves were typing up walls of text about how they were literally throwing shit at their TV's, how "patriarchy" enabled that scene to be aired, how GRRM is a sadist & a pedophile, and that they're done with the show (lol). It was glorious.

The SA thread must be archived by now, but you can get a sample of that utter beta feminist rage here:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/divorcing-hbo-sundays-brutal-game-of-thrones-goes-way-too-far/

(Incidentally, daily appreciation for our Skynet overlords: I only vaguely remembered reading this article, so the best I could google was 'game of thrones red wedding pregnant never watch again', and boom it still was the first result  :nixon:)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on February 26, 2014, 10:02:03 AM
Nothing will beat the amount of  :ultlibrage: that occurred in TVIV when that pregnant girl on Game of Thrones got repeatedly stabbed in the gut. Goons in droves were typing up walls of text about how they were literally throwing shit at their TV's, how "patriarchy" enabled that scene to be aired, how GRRM is a sadist & a pedophile, and that they're done with the show (lol). It was glorious.
The reaction to that scene was so overblown. They acted like it was some 30 minute scene showing mans dominance over women, instead of like a 8 second scene of a woman getting killed and moving on to the next victim.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on February 26, 2014, 10:32:00 AM
That's a thing I don't get about TVIV and CineD.

If Walter White kills a bunch of people, it's because he's an asshole.
When Tony Soprano kicks a dude in his broken leg, it's because he's an asshole.
When Bill Masters cheats on his wife, it's because he's an asshole.
When Tony Montana does a bunch of drugs and shoots people, it's because he's an asshole.
When any character rapes anyone ever it's RAPE! RAPE! PATRIARCHY! NORMALISING RAPE CULTURE!
When any character hits a woman, it's MISOGYNY!
When any character is a racist, it's RACISM! UGH! WHITE HOLLYWOOD STRIKES AGAIN!

Like, why is it that it's only violence against women and racism that can't be included in a work of fiction without it being construed as approval of these acts? Include as much thieving, swearing, cheating, violence and debauchery as you like and people can realise that it's just to establish character. Hit a SJW trigger and woah fuck better accuse the writers of approving of that shit. Really, really weird.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on February 26, 2014, 01:21:40 PM
Nothing will beat the amount of  :ultlibrage: that occurred in TVIV when that pregnant girl on Game of Thrones got repeatedly stabbed in the gut. Goons in droves were typing up walls of text about how they were literally throwing shit at their TV's, how "patriarchy" enabled that scene to be aired, how GRRM is a sadist & a pedophile, and that they're done with the show (lol). It was glorious.

isn't there actual kidfucking in the books? and this is what they get upset over :rolleyes:

It's set in a world where everyone is considered an adult way younger than in modern times, so a woman is of an age to be betrothed once she starts ovulating pretty much. A basic fantasy medieval setting. One of the ~greatest knights~ of the current generation for example is ~16

Daenerys Targaryen is wed to a tribal chief for political/economic reasons when she's ~13 and her new husband LITERALLY TAKES NO FOR AN ANSWER until she's ready to consummate the marriage with him and is then literally treated like a queen and pampered by this chief who pretty much falls in love with her for more than just "hey, a warm hole to fuck." So naturally it's also RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE AND PATRIARCHY AT WORK.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on February 26, 2014, 03:35:46 PM
GoT is basically medieval Europe and "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed" wasn't just some edgy joke, it was what you needed to do to not go extinct, since you were considered methuselah-levels of ancient if you were of the common folk and made it to your 30s. If you look at the ages royalty in the middleages got married, 13 was approaching spinsterhood. You lived fast and died young (unless you were insanely rich, and even then, no guarantee).

And before we get :myanimes: faggots up in here, these 13 year old girls were usually either getting married off to dudes around their own ages (for common folk) or rich important people who, in the days before prenatal care, needed maximum fertility time to ensure a male heir gets squeezed out.

So GoT has lots of child fucking, but so did the historical time period its based off of.

Now, if you want to talk about why GRRM chose that time period and made a decision to keep to the child-fucking practices of 1200's Europe instead of just handwaving a reason to avoid it , go right ahead.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rape priviledge on February 26, 2014, 03:50:24 PM

Now, if you want to talk about why GRRM chose that time period and made a decision to keep to the child-fucking practices of 1200's Europe instead of just handwaving a reason to avoid it , go right ahead.

Because:
(http://i.imgur.com/6gvWeoW.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 26, 2014, 04:04:12 PM
GoT is basically medieval Europe and "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed" wasn't just some edgy joke, it was what you needed to do to not go extinct, since you were considered methuselah-levels of ancient if you were of the common folk and made it to your 30s. If you look at the ages royalty in the middleages got married, 13 was approaching spinsterhood. You lived fast and died young (unless you were insanely rich, and even then, no guarantee).

Sorry but that's a complete myth. While it's true that the life expectancy on average was incredibly low compared to today, that's only because of how many children died in infancy or in early age due to plagues and so on. Once you managed to survive all of that shit then it was more or less smooth sailing until you reached old age like we do today. Sure, the likelyhood of making it to 80+ was extremely slim, but not making it to your 60s.

Quote
And before we get :myanimes: faggots up in here, these 13 year old girls were usually either getting married off to dudes around their own ages (for common folk) or rich important people who, in the days before prenatal care, needed maximum fertility time to ensure a male heir gets squeezed out.

13 year olds were men and women back then, they were not children. At 13 you were expected not only to do everything that a man today at 21 does, but much more in a far more cruel environment. There is no comparison in terms of what they were like and what we're like today.

A bunch of medieval 12 year old boys would probably see a bunch of guys in their 20s today and completely ravage their shit.

Quote
Now, if you want to talk about why GRRM chose that time period and made a decision to keep to the child-fucking practices of 1200's Europe instead of just handwaving a reason to avoid it , go right ahead.

Does it really matter? I've never read the books and can't really stand the TV show, but my understand is not that he has a bunch of graphic exploitative scenes where children get fucked by adults, it's mostly people of the same age fucking each others or arranged marriages based on what would have happened if there were dragons in the middle-ages

I mean I don't read those books because swords and dragons bullshit is for faggot nerds, and I don't need to read about children fucking each others, but that seems to be completely different from say, anime, where the fucking is animated graphics and kind of the point instead of something that just happens as part of regular life
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on February 26, 2014, 04:47:27 PM
Sorry but that's a complete myth. While it's true that the life expectancy on average was incredibly low compared to today, that's only because of how many children died in infancy or in early age due to plagues and so on. Once you managed to survive all of that shit then it was more or less smooth sailing until you reached old age like we do today. Sure, the likelyhood of making it to 80+ was extremely slim, but not making it to your 60s.

I read dead before 40 figures were still pretty accurate for the serfs until the horse-plow got common in the 1000's.

Quote
A bunch of medieval 12 year old boys would probably see a bunch of guys in their 20s today and completely ravage their shit.

Especially if you gave them AKs
:nigganomics:


Quote
Does it really matter?

It doesn't, but arguing about if GRRM is a pedo is slightly less goony than arguing about pretend book lands. I really don't give a shit either way unless he's going to thailand to actually molest children.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on February 26, 2014, 06:00:23 PM
I actually really like Game of Thrones. The production values are top-notch, the acting is solid, and you can tell everyone's having a lot of fun bringing the world to life. But I have a billion things better to do with my time than post 888s about political hegemony in whateverthefuck make-believe land thought up by a guy who looks like pedo confucius
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on February 26, 2014, 06:21:33 PM
swords and dragons bullshit is for faggot nerds

Quoted for truth.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 26, 2014, 06:27:25 PM
Also the last thing to blow up in fucking TVIV is that whenever a show mentions bitcoin, they fucking start raging about it like they had just made a rape joke about Michelle Obama or something. Like, it will fucking derail threads with dozens of comments alternating between "lol bitcoins" and full-on rage

It's really fucking annoying
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Randomlurker on February 26, 2014, 06:52:40 PM
Goon rage about True Detective

:facepalm: How are they so goddamn dumb? Yes Hart treats his wife and kids like shit and slapping her and insulting her was fucked up. The entire point is to show that Hart is a very flawed man who has issues in dealing with people outside of the work environment.  Also hint for morons: Parents have every right to be outraged about dangerous sexual behavior like that and most fathers worth a shit would have wanted to beat the living hell out of two adults who sleep with their underaged daughter.

This is also the daughter whose behavior had been a giant red flag for 'someone sexually abused me'.  Fucking hell.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on February 26, 2014, 07:41:20 PM
Also the last thing to blow up in fucking TVIV is that whenever a show mentions bitcoin, they fucking start raging about it like they had just made a rape joke about Michelle Obama or something. Like, it will fucking derail threads with dozens of comments alternating between "lol bitcoins" and full-on rage

It's really fucking annoying

From what I know bitcoin is p-dumb but I guess the main goonrage against it is it's somehow associated with libertarians? (racist patriarachal fygm types)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on February 26, 2014, 08:45:41 PM
Also the last thing to blow up in fucking TVIV is that whenever a show mentions bitcoin, they fucking start raging about it like they had just made a rape joke about Michelle Obama or something. Like, it will fucking derail threads with dozens of comments alternating between "lol bitcoins" and full-on rage

It's really fucking annoying

From what I know bitcoin is p-dumb but I guess the main goonrage against it is it's somehow associated with libertarians? (racist patriarachal fygm types)

Yeah, before there were MRAs the goon hate machine was aimed at the Libertarians who are slightly more numerous than MRAs but possess roughly the same amount of political/social power.

That is to say none.

But they're easy to froth about and they did actually used to be the dominant group in D&D.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on February 26, 2014, 09:54:22 PM
Goon rage about True Detective

:facepalm: How are they so goddamn dumb? Yes Hart treats his wife and kids like shit and slapping her and insulting her was fucked up. The entire point is to show that Hart is a very flawed man who has issues in dealing with people outside of the work environment.  Also hint for morons: Parents have every right to be outraged about dangerous sexual behavior like that and most fathers worth a shit would have wanted to beat the living hell out of two adults who sleep with their underaged daughter.

This is also the daughter whose behavior had been a giant red flag for 'someone sexually abused me'.  Fucking hell.

Some things are so serious they should never be mentioned unless you're accusing a man of doing it to raise awareness.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on February 26, 2014, 10:06:43 PM
Nothing will beat the amount of  :ultlibrage: that occurred in TVIV when that pregnant girl on Game of Thrones got repeatedly stabbed in the gut. Goons in droves were typing up walls of text about how they were literally throwing shit at their TV's, how "patriarchy" enabled that scene to be aired, how GRRM is a sadist & a pedophile, and that they're done with the show (lol). It was glorious.

The SA thread must be archived by now, but you can get a sample of that utter beta feminist rage here:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/divorcing-hbo-sundays-brutal-game-of-thrones-goes-way-too-far/

(Incidentally, daily appreciation for our Skynet overlords: I only vaguely remembered reading this article, so the best I could google was 'game of thrones red wedding pregnant never watch again', and boom it still was the first result  :nixon:)

I remember that thread.  I stopped reading mediaite because of it.  I remember the article was a whole whine-fest about cruelty and brutality in a show about cruelty and brutality. 

In the comments, a bunch of users complained and were then banned after calling the author out for a) being a complete and utter faggot and b) saying, "don't watch if you can't take it" and c)  mocking the authors advocating a change of one of the defining events that the entire series hinges upon. 

When comments got heated (as nerds do) the pussy admin waded in like Lowtax on an epic bender of benders and scolded his user base, issuing bans left and right rather than admonishing the faggot author.

Lesson 1 to all site admins: politeness and inclusion aside; if you knowingly publish flamebait, don't act all offended when your users rebel against you.
Lesson 2: new writers for websites are a lot easier than getting new eyeballs.  I've never clicked on a mediaite link since that fiasco and never will again.  Fuck that place.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nig Disliker on February 27, 2014, 12:00:49 AM
Nothing will beat the amount of  :ultlibrage: that occurred in TVIV when that pregnant girl on Game of Thrones got repeatedly stabbed in the gut. Goons in droves were typing up walls of text about how they were literally throwing shit at their TV's, how "patriarchy" enabled that scene to be aired, how GRRM is a sadist & a pedophile, and that they're done with the show (lol). It was glorious.

The SA thread must be archived by now, but you can get a sample of that utter beta feminist rage here:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/divorcing-hbo-sundays-brutal-game-of-thrones-goes-way-too-far/

(Incidentally, daily appreciation for our Skynet overlords: I only vaguely remembered reading this article, so the best I could google was 'game of thrones red wedding pregnant never watch again', and boom it still was the first result  :nixon:)

I remember that thread.  I stopped reading mediaite because of it.  I remember the article was a whole whine-fest about cruelty and brutality in a show about cruelty and brutality. 

In the comments, a bunch of users complained and were then banned after calling the author out for a) being a complete and utter faggot and b) saying, "don't watch if you can't take it" and c)  mocking the authors advocating a change of one of the defining events that the entire series hinges upon. 

When comments got heated (as nerds do) the pussy admin waded in like Lowtax on an epic bender of benders and scolded his user base, issuing bans left and right rather than admonishing the faggot author.

Lesson 1 to all site admins: politeness and inclusion aside; if you knowingly publish flamebait, don't act all offended when your users rebel against you.
Lesson 2: new writers for websites are a lot easier than getting new eyeballs.  I've never clicked on a mediaite link since that fiasco and never will again.  Fuck that place.

That's the big problem with a lot of those kinds of sites these days: the writers write a bunch of flamebait and then cry and whine when they achieve its intended effect. 
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on February 28, 2014, 08:31:02 PM
Quote from: steakmancer" post="426127096
The Rust-Maggie scene was the one actual scene from this show that wasn't amazing and tone-perfect for the situation and contained such an uncharacteristic series of actions from Rust that has really soured the last 2 episodes for me.

I get where Maggie is coming from and an erotic confrontation between her and Rust seemed like a cliched, inevitable scene that I really didn't want to see, but the scene seemed chiefly to fill in the stilted, absurdly short HBO sex scene quota for a popular series, with proper character development fitting the bill.

I'm not ungrateful for the Monaghan and McConaughey butt but several thresholds of character misbehaviour were crossed for reasons I don't really understand:

1) Rust consenting in the first place - Rust ate Maggie's confession head on before her thong even dropped so pouring some of her wine and dropping trough obligingly seems really unfathomable.

2) Rust fucking finishing inside Maggie - Ok, maybe Rust's lizard brain got the best of him and Michelle Monaghan is smoking hot but coital interruption is totally out of the question for the most cerebral, sane (according to him earlier in the episode) detective on the show? Also really the hallmark of HBO sex scene design is on display as he fucking busts his nut in 10 seconds (not that I could go further) from the ravenous, sensual foreplay of Maggie talking about how she almost fucked a stranger in a bar and her forcing herself on Rust's neck for the same duration.

3) Rust exploding (post-testicular explosion) at Maggie - This is sort of the most understandable response to the totally outrageous events it proceeds, I imagine Rust feels pretty bad about himself for not bringing his A-game to Maggie so he shoves her out the door to play with his Mag-Lite some more.

I mean if this is all of Rust's keikaku for some Sherlock-esque Marty manipulation to bust the Tuttle Illuminati two weeks from now I'll laugh at the response I had today but that scene was super fucking dumb.

lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 28, 2014, 08:35:02 PM
between game of thrones, wolf of wall street, and now true detective, i don't think i want to watch tv/movies with my parents anymore
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 28, 2014, 08:35:44 PM
stop living with them, problem solved
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 28, 2014, 08:36:59 PM
i was only visiting :stuckup:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 28, 2014, 08:37:53 PM
i know you told them "a month or two", but three years is three years nigga
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 28, 2014, 08:41:16 PM
if you must know my whole life story i hadn't lived with them since i was 19 and only moved back in january last year and moved out again in october

 :depressedlesbian:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 28, 2014, 09:06:58 PM
lol hit a sore spot sorry tuss
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on February 28, 2014, 09:30:50 PM
lol hit a sore spot
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on February 28, 2014, 09:33:18 PM
between game of thrones, wolf of wall street, and now true detective, i don't think i want to watch tv/movies with my parents anymore

I feel so bad for you people who have fathers you can't casually talk about pussy with.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on March 01, 2014, 05:47:16 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/JefuBOy.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on March 03, 2014, 09:48:04 AM
So this week's True Detective included a conversation with a character who had been drugged, molested and gang-raped as a schoolkid and who subsequently ended up as a transvestite gay hooker.

Troon Trigger Alert Code Red.

 :ultlibrage:"WHAT ARE THEY IMPLYING?"  :ultlibrage:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on March 04, 2014, 12:11:28 AM
I just binged through all the currently aired episodes of True Dectective on this cold, rainy day and fuck, what an amazing show. The part with the Iron Crusaders MC blowing that niggers head off for calling him a cracker was just  :reagan:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: ouroboros of faggotry on March 04, 2014, 12:33:23 AM
It's utterly laughable at all the readings goons come up with in CineD/TVIV. I have read interpretations in those threads that I haven't seen any fucking where else IE they don't bloody exist you dumbfuck goons. And woe betide you if you dare to dissent from the Hugbox Hivemind. The best part is too that the interpretations they come up with downright suck - no goons, there is no gay subtext in Prometheus. I'm gay and it never even fucking registered to me (or any non-goons).  :facepalm:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on March 04, 2014, 01:44:28 AM
It's utterly laughable at all the readings goons come up with in CineD/TVIV. I have read interpretations in those threads that I haven't seen any fucking where else IE they don't bloody exist you dumbfuck goons. And woe betide you if you dare to dissent from the Hugbox Hivemind. The best part is too that the interpretations they come up with downright suck - no goons, there is no gay subtext in Prometheus. I'm gay and it never even fucking registered to me (or any non-goons).  :facepalm:

I don't know, I figured the robot dude probably craved the cock.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on March 04, 2014, 03:50:36 AM
I wasn't aware goons claiming gay innuendoes were in Prometheus. I do remember how they were  :ultlibrage: racist subtext behind the physical appearance of those "Aryan" looking Engineers.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on March 04, 2014, 06:40:08 AM
Prometheus was a shit movie with terrible acting.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on March 04, 2014, 09:21:25 AM
Prometheus was a shit movie with terrible acting.

When the last good movie in your franchise was made when  :reagan: was President, then maybe you should just stop.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: post regret II on March 04, 2014, 10:44:07 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/JefuBOy.jpg)

watch out sophie turner!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: marlon perkins on March 04, 2014, 10:46:44 AM
dear goons, the scary moving picture people inside the magic box are not real people, they cannot hurt you or your feels or steal your souls
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on March 04, 2014, 03:59:20 PM
dear goons, the scary moving picture people inside the magic box are not real people, they cannot hurt you or your feels or steal your souls

if you can be triggered by a work of fiction you're a faggot pansy
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DeadCrow on March 04, 2014, 04:09:16 PM
dear goons, the scary moving picture people inside the magic box are not real people, they cannot hurt you or your feels or steal your souls

if you can be triggered by a work of fiction you're a faggot pansy
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on March 04, 2014, 04:15:09 PM
dear goons, the scary moving picture people inside the magic box are not real people, they cannot hurt you or your feels or steal your souls

if you can be triggered by a work of fiction you're a faggot pansy

ACTUAL ptsd is a real thing. When you watch your budy die face down in the muck after getting his torso blown in half by some zipperhead with a grenade you get a little twitchy the next time you hear something go BANG

Goons claiming to have been "triggered" or to have anxiety or PTSD are pathetic shut-ins co-opting the legit mental problems carried around by grizzled war veterans
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on March 07, 2014, 04:21:06 PM
Quote from: raditts
What is it with Denis Leary anyway, where he seems to desperately wish he was some kind of New York Tough Guy like a firefighter or an EMT or whatever? Did he want to get one of those for Career Day at school, but he drew "mediocre actor / hack comedian" instead?

Quote from: ...of SCIENCE!
The Ref is pretty much the only non-animated Denis Leary performance I can actually deal with.

As far as I'm concerned the high point of his comedy career was his him consistently getting smacked down by the token liberal comedian on Colin Quinn's comedy central show.

 :librage: "Leary will never be a legitimate actor or comedian til he drops his whole poisonously masculine cishetbro attitude, Fuck you Dad,  FUCK YOU JOCKS"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Mossad Assassin on March 07, 2014, 04:38:15 PM
So this week's True Detective included a conversation with a character who had been drugged, molested and gang-raped as a schoolkid and who subsequently ended up as a transvestite gay hooker.

Troon Trigger Alert Code Red.

 :ultlibrage:"WHAT ARE THEY IMPLYING?"  :ultlibrage:

are they posting that rust is going to face off with cuthulu, etc., in the final episode? if so, can someone post screencaps because lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on March 07, 2014, 06:44:30 PM
Quote from: raditts
What is it with Denis Leary anyway, where he seems to desperately wish he was some kind of New York Tough Guy like a firefighter or an EMT or whatever? Did he want to get one of those for Career Day at school, but he drew "mediocre actor / hack comedian" instead?

Quote from: ...of SCIENCE!
The Ref is pretty much the only non-animated Denis Leary performance I can actually deal with.

As far as I'm concerned the high point of his comedy career was his him consistently getting smacked down by the token liberal comedian on Colin Quinn's comedy central show.

 :librage: "Leary will never be a legitimate actor or comedian til he drops his whole poisonously masculine cishetbro attitude, Fuck you Dad,  FUCK YOU JOCKS"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrgpZ0fUixs
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on March 07, 2014, 08:17:25 PM
The best part about TRUE DETECTIVE IS GOING TO EXPLORE THE MYTHOS is that all the shit about he Yellow King is in the expanded mythos; its based off some short stories Lovecraft read and enjoyed, and dropped a small reference to them once. The short stories the author wrote seemed to have more incommon with the themes of True Detective, but you know, goons.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on March 07, 2014, 09:14:23 PM
The best part about TRUE DETECTIVE IS GOING TO EXPLORE THE MYTHOS is that all the shit about he Yellow King is in the expanded mythos; its based off some short stories Lovecraft read and enjoyed, and dropped a small reference to them once. The short stories the author wrote seemed to have more incommon with the themes of True Detective, but you know, goons.

There was actually a similar case in the early 2000's that inspired the plot of True Detective, it's easy to google. But yeah I agree, goons.   :tuss:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on March 08, 2014, 05:31:21 PM
From Professor Clumsy. The kids movie Planes.

Quote
The female planes are apparently designed by someone who has no idea what a female plane would look like. The idea of introducing gendered identities to normally non-gendered objects so often treats the familiar as inherently masculine. Female planes are painted hot pink and granted the enlarged, fluttery eyelashes so often used to distinguish women from men in lazily drawn cartoons. "Look at that propellor," declares Dusty and he gets a look at one of the ladyplanes' rear end. In one scene, the film even eroticises the tilting of wingflaps for a disturbingly long time. You could argue that it is a joke. I would argue that it enforces the idea of objectifying women to all the five-year-old boys in the audience by applying it to literal objects who have gender but no sex. Gotta start them off early, after all.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 08, 2014, 05:47:24 PM
thats who is modded to help CD foster discussion
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on March 08, 2014, 05:54:43 PM
Thats a lot of words to say "i swallow"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on March 08, 2014, 06:08:10 PM
Putting something as anodyne and simplistic as feminine eyelashes on an anthropomorphized cartoon plane to denote that its a girl, for the purposes of making a character and story understandable to the target audience of five year olds, as opposed to a giant pair of tits (which will wreck the aerodynamics)? Problematic as fuck. Putting an actual pair of big giant tits on a cartoon character of a twelve year old girl for the purposes of titillating the target audience of neckbearded shut-ins? Fine because animes and Japan and they're actually centuries old demons.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Danger-Weiner on March 08, 2014, 06:31:56 PM
Quote
The female planes are apparently designed by someone who has no idea what a female plane would look like.

 :evola:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 18, 2014, 06:30:59 PM
Quote from: Rarity
Hey guys, let's all get topless!

http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on March 18, 2014, 06:48:23 PM
Quote from: Rarity
Hey guys, let's all get topless!

http://i.imgur.com/R8ZSgQB.png

This thing's tits are something you would see in Total Recall or at a Bar on Tatooine.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 18, 2014, 08:56:37 PM
I will say this:

Deadpool is the best mod.

Quote from: Deadpool" post="427136739
Alright, let's end the Aatrek shit here please. Because all that shit really does make me angry. I'm a chill guy and don't get angry over much, especially so on the fucking internet, but the Aatrek stuff still makes me angry to this day. I understand it's a dirty part of our history here in TV IV, and I don't want to act like it didn't happen because that's just wrong. And I understand that people want to make jokes about it because of the fucked up absurdity of it. Even I've made offhand jokes about it on occasion. But personally I just don't want to be overtly reminded of it because it's one of those things that actually makes me angry. So just cut it out please as a favor to me. If you don't like me and just want to keep on piling on with it I'm not gonna stop you because that's not really fair to punish people for something like that. But at the same time, I try to give everyone here a lot more leeway and not make it some authoritative dictatorship like Aatrek did. All I ask in return is just don't dredge up this shit that actually makes me angry.

And Aatrek if you really are out there under some other username reading this I hope I never find out. There was a time not long ago when I hoped that I had the chance to find and ban you over and over again for all this shit. But I've gotten past that now and moved on. If you're here just keep out of my sight. That all I have to say to you.

Quote from: Deadpool" post="427139043
Quote from: precision" post="427138907
Deadpool is one of the 50% of SA mods who are actually good at their job and not annoying or terrible, so yeah.  Don't quit.
Who said anything about quitting? Also being a mod isn't a job, or at least it shouldn't be. It's more like a volunteer crossing guard for an elementary school. Even more proof of why Aatrek was wrong for the job. (Now see, that's how you do it.)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on March 18, 2014, 09:50:28 PM
Um, he didn't try to defend Aatrek with wacky zany lowtax twitter nonsense and he's not a pathetically jobless undateable thirty year old going on about how hard it is to voluntarily clear the mod queue on a dead gay forum. Hes clearly modding for the wrong damn website.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: PUSSY CANCER on March 18, 2014, 11:37:38 PM
Pro read

Quote
In Episode 3, the preacher says to Cohle, "Compassion is ethics, detective" when he departs the trailer leaving the reformed pedophile Burt in distress.  Cohle replies "Yes, it is."

But if Time was created so things could become, and if acting out of the interest of others is compassion, then we should assume that Cohle is "becoming", changing into something else.  But what?

Cohle asks in Ep. 5 "Why should I live on in history?"  It's an odd line, especially when in episode 1 he tells Marty that he "lacks the constitution for suicide."  But he also meditates on the cross (as an atheist),  "contemplates that moment in the garden, of allowing your own crucifixion."  But by 2012, Cohle has changed.  He's resigned himself to ending his own life, but only after settling this debt- doing what he owes.  One last act of compassion before giving up the only thing he has.  His life.  And once he's willing to do that, then he can do all the things in his life that require selflessness, courage, etc (i.e. things that require faith).  You have to accept the infinite so you can make the right moves in the finite.

And when he does this, when he resigns himself not to his fate but to his eternity of endlessly repeating, at that moment he will actually have faith, because that's when he proves he believes in the eternal.  Only after doing this last good thing does he believe that he could stand the idea of an eternity of rerunning his life, because he knows at the end, he's fulfilled it.  "Nothing is fulfilled--until the end."

According to Kierkegaard, this resignation to the eternal is crucial.  Kierkegaard was not an atheist but a diehard Christian.  He believed that when a man resigns himself to the eternal, to existing in eternity, and gives up everything that ties him to this world then he becomes a "knight of faith" capable of great Christian acts (like the self-sacrifice that is almost certainly coming in ep. 8 ).  When Kierkegaard wrote about a Knight of Faith, he contrasted the Knight of Faith to the mere Knight of Infinite, the "God botherer"--a phrase used twice in the show.  What did Kierkegaard say the Knight of Faith looked like?  Like this:

Quote
Why, he looks like a tax-collector!" However, it is the man after all. I draw closer to him, watching his least movements to see whether there might not be visible a little heterogeneous fractional telegraphic message from the infinite, a glance, a look, a gesture, a note of sadness, a smile, which betrayed the infinite in its heterogeneity with the finite. No! I examine his figure from tip to toe to see if there might not be a cranny through which the infinite was peeping. No! He is solid through and through. His tread? It is vigorous, belonging entirely to finiteness; no smartly dressed townsman who walks out to Fresberg on a Sunday afternoon treads the ground more firmly, he belongs entirely to the world, no Philistine more so. One can discover nothing of that aloof and superior nature whereby one recognizes the knight of the infinite. He takes delight in everything, and whenever one sees him taking part in a particular pleasure, he does it with the persistence which is the mark of the earthly man whose soul is absorbed in such things. He tends to his work. So when one looks at him one might suppose that he was a clerk who had lost his soul in an intricate system of book-keeping, so precise is he.

[Here I said that the reference was clear, but that Cohle did not look like this at all, that he appeared much more like the knight of inifinite resignation, the "tragic hero."]

The point is that the writer is taking the concept and running with it.  If we've already spotted Kierkegaard, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, then we are firmly entrenched in the existential project, and we should expect to find references from other existentialists also.  And we do.  The preacher in 2002 tells us that God is dead ("only nearness is silence"). Ep 3 Marty asks Cohle the question from Dostoyevsky, "You know what people would do without God, it would be an orgy of murder and debauchery."  Would it?  Existentialists say no.  Do we have Sartre?  Why yes, we do.  There's angst and despair all over the place.  And the angst is brought on by the burden of freedom, not the absence of it.

Think how often Cohle ruminations on suicide echo Camus's formulation of suicide as the fundamental question of philosophy in the Myth of Sisyphus (a guy endlessly pushing a rock up a hill, over and over, repetition, cyclical.)  But Camus answers it in the negative, faced with a meaningless world, you embrace the absurd and revolt, not commit suicide.  And isn't what they are doing now a revolt?  Kidnapping cops, burglarizing the houses of the most powerful figures in the state?  If this group has been kidnapping kids, if they held power for generations in the state, if they are plugged in all all levels, then isn't acting against them so deliberately a revolt against power?

And if they are embracing revolt, if they are not embracing suicide (but are willing to make a sacrifice, is there a difference?) then they have embraced the absurd, and are on their way to the teleological moment ("Teleos de Lorca, Franciscan mystic"--a made-up guy that invokes Francis of Assisi a second time, reminds us of the teleological stakes, and re-invokes mysticism to bridge us from the ethical paradigm of the characters to the Continental philosophy started by Bataille (who was derogatorily called a mystic by Sartre, all in one shot, how is that for economy of storytelling, take that Cormac McCarthy)).

Revolt: "Fuck this world," Cohle says. Remember how he says it?  Not in anger, almost off-handedly, like he's passing on the offer of a free lunch.  No anger, no big explosion.  Just...resignation. But he only gets around to trying to screw it 10 years after he says it.  And in 2012, it's jumper cable time.  No institutional rules.  And no masked perversion of the established rules.  (I'm a cop who's job is to uphold the law, and therefore I'm the one who can break it).  Rather than commit literal suicide, they commit it metaphorically, by giving up and saying goodbye to everything to take on the very institution that defined their identity.

And if it is a revolt, then we invoke all the ideas of consistent with revolution?  Do we push out of the existential angst of the 50's into the revolution of the 60's and beyond?  The "present" in the show is 2012?  Will we get a postmodern postmortem, an aftermath 2 years later set in 2014? And by then, how much more of the landscape will be swallowed by Carcosa, the corrupting refinery towers that loom in the back of every scene in the show?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on March 19, 2014, 02:11:56 AM
:888:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on March 19, 2014, 10:38:25 AM
I will say this:

Deadpool is the best mod.

Quote from: Deadpool" post="427136739
Alright, let's end the Aatrek shit here please. Because all that shit really does make me angry. I'm a chill guy and don't get angry over much, especially so on the fucking internet, but the Aatrek stuff still makes me angry to this day. I understand it's a dirty part of our history here in TV IV, and I don't want to act like it didn't happen because that's just wrong. And I understand that people want to make jokes about it because of the fucked up absurdity of it. Even I've made offhand jokes about it on occasion. But personally I just don't want to be overtly reminded of it because it's one of those things that actually makes me angry. So just cut it out please as a favor to me. If you don't like me and just want to keep on piling on with it I'm not gonna stop you because that's not really fair to punish people for something like that. But at the same time, I try to give everyone here a lot more leeway and not make it some authoritative dictatorship like Aatrek did. All I ask in return is just don't dredge up this shit that actually makes me angry.

And Aatrek if you really are out there under some other username reading this I hope I never find out. There was a time not long ago when I hoped that I had the chance to find and ban you over and over again for all this shit. But I've gotten past that now and moved on. If you're here just keep out of my sight. That all I have to say to you.

Quote from: Deadpool" post="427139043
Quote from: precision" post="427138907
Deadpool is one of the 50% of SA mods who are actually good at their job and not annoying or terrible, so yeah.  Don't quit.
Who said anything about quitting? Also being a mod isn't a job, or at least it shouldn't be. It's more like a volunteer crossing guard for an elementary school. Even more proof of why Aatrek was wrong for the job. (Now see, that's how you do it.)

I guess, to a degree, I can get where Deadpool is coming from but if this were something that happened on places like tvtropes or reddit, SA would never, ever let it go. No matter how "unfair" it might be to the rest of SA to bring up Aatrek, it's asking a lot to just brush it off like it never happened. Especially considering how shady the mods and admins have been lately, I'm still not convinced that they didn't know. The fact that Lowtax point blank refuses to get rid of Zack Parson's anime child porn, and the fact that it took years to get rid of Loosechanj despite Loosechanj.jpg being spammed all over the forums, doesn't speak well of SA's sincerity.

Deadpool seems like an okay person, but I don't have much sympathy. I'm angry too, and I'm not interested in having shit like a convicted kiddy diddler modding the forums swept under the rug just because those dastardly trolls are criticizing the staff members whose job was to prevent shit like that.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on March 19, 2014, 10:41:28 AM
i can buy that they didnt know about aatrek and if it was just him id get the urge to want to move past it. but you have had SO SO MANY fuckups and weirdos as mods that that just happens to be the worst of the bunch.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on March 19, 2014, 11:38:48 AM
i can buy that they didnt know about aatrek and if it was just him id get the urge to want to move past it. but you have had SO SO MANY fuckups and weirdos as mods that that just happens to be the worst of the bunch.

It's not like Aatrek was the first actual rapist appointed as a mod there, either.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: FALSE FLAG POSTING EVENT on March 19, 2014, 11:48:57 AM
i can buy that they didnt know about aatrek and if it was just him id get the urge to want to move past it. but you have had SO SO MANY fuckups and weirdos as mods that that just happens to be the worst of the bunch.

It's not like Aatrek was the first actual rapist appointed as a mod there, either.

Why do I gotta ask for the deets bro?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on March 19, 2014, 11:50:58 AM
Haha, what a fucking faggot Deadpool is.

Nobody with half an ounce of sense judges the SA mods for Aatrek being a paedo. Who the fuck is going to Doxx people for the vitally important role of Internet moderator? The people actually getting legit pissed that SA DARED to let a totally anonymous kid diddler keep a secret are fucking mongoloids.

It's just that "lol Aatrek" is easy shorthand for the dichotomy between the way some mods will present themselves and actual reality. When Abe goes on some fucking diatribe about how he works ceaselessly to keep The Bad Posters out, or Ozma goes on about the HEAVY BURDEN OF MODERATION the saintly admins carry or some fucking jackoff sucks mod dick because THEY DO SUCH A GOOD JOB AND ARE OBJECTIVELY BETTER PEOPLE you can go all 888 explaining precisely why that's retarded, or you can just go "lol Aatrek" and take a swipe at mod/admin egos without gambling $10 - because even the most 'tismtastic, power mad, Ralp-ass motherfuckers will hesitate before banning someone saying "paedophiles are bad".

But Deadpool's all ABOOOHOOOHOOO PLEASE DON'T PUNISH ME FOR AAAAATREK. Like, motherfucker had absolutely nothing to do with Aatrek, no control over Aatrek's actions and precisely fuck all to do with any of it. Tearing at his fucking hair and flagellating himself isn't because he's cool, it's because he's an egomaniacal fuckhead with no perspective. And cutting a fucking promo about AATREK STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME MANG is sooooo fucking feeble. HEY JEFE CHOO FUCK WIT' ME MANG I CUT CHOO. Oh Deadpool, you're such a hero! So few men would dare to say I DISLIKE PAEDOS. Ravish me now, on a pile of printouts of Tumblr slash fanfiction.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 19, 2014, 12:08:41 PM
Christ you faggots, did you even read what he wrote? :clint:

He didn't say that people shouldn't make fun of Aatrek because it reflected badly on the mods, he said he wished people would shut up about it because it's not relevant to television and because it really fucking angers him to know that a convicted child rapist was on the staff for so long and acted like he was just another regular guy. Afaik he was friendly with the guy so there's a sting of betrayal of whatever added for him, and that's why he wants people to shut up about it.

Notice what he did:

- He asked people to stop politely
- He also said that if they wanted to talk about it, they could and they wouldn't get probated for it
- When people said 'Stop or he'll quit!' he said it wasn't a threat to quit, just a personal preference

Faggots with less than a 3rd grade reading comprehension skill piling on someone who should be applauded for not treating it like a job, not treating it like a celebrity status and not trying to shut people up from talking about things that annoy him. You might expect that from anyone who's not retarded, but coming from the SA moderation team that makes him the fucking ubermensch.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Bobby Hill in a dress on March 19, 2014, 12:37:59 PM
Yeah I got the impression he wanted people to stop bringing it up not because of defending SA but more because who the fuck wants to be reminded of child rape everyday?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on March 19, 2014, 12:47:25 PM
My only gripe with him is he didn't say squat about Aatrek's moderating until he was outed for being who he was. Just seems cowardly of him to all of a sudden be outspoken on what a shit mod Aatrek is when he's long gone. Maybe if he had spoken up before TVIV wouldn't have turned into the cesspool it is.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Strategically placed watermelon on March 19, 2014, 02:14:25 PM
My only gripe with him is he didn't say squat about Aatrek's moderating until he was outed for being who he was. Just seems cowardly of him to all of a sudden be outspoken on what a shit mod Aatrek is when he's long gone. Maybe if he had spoken up before TVIV wouldn't have turned into the cesspool it is.

What could he have done? What would have happened if he had posted in the mod forum "I disagree with how Aatrek moderates TVIV?"

"It's a volunteer job, nobody's making you do it, Aatrek does a good job, if you don't like it, quit" etc etc etc. The mods always protected the status quo first and foremost, that's why they were allowed to mod the same forum for years and years and years and never change anything substantial policy-wise. Neither Aatrek or the rest of the mods would have allowed anything to change and it would have been a war of attrition until Deadpool stepped down. Such is the faggotry of internet party politics
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 19, 2014, 03:06:50 PM
You can't blame anyone for not speaking up before the Aatrek doxx when doing that would most likely result in losing your tenbux + whatever else you bought and also put you on a mod's shitlist to end up banned once again in the future

Even today there are certain mods or admins you can't really shit on without ending up that way (Abe, Ralp)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on March 19, 2014, 03:17:16 PM
Fuck, if the dude takes his internet forums as seriously as to be driven to actual real life anger (GRRRRRRR!) because of some words on his screen, then he should be savvy enough to know and recognise that the Aatrek shit is going to be a punchline (and deservedly so) there, on that comedy website, from now until the place shuts its doors and everyone leaves. Complaining about it is like complaining about it getting dark at night or some shit.

It's a bunch of meaningless drivel on his screen, about a bunch of meaningless drivel, typed by a bunch of anonymous, insignificant people he's never going to meet. He should chill.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on March 19, 2014, 03:53:15 PM
Was Aatrek actually that bad of a mod outside of his Star Trek thread? I don't remember him being as bad of a mod than most others.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on March 19, 2014, 03:57:41 PM
Yes
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 19, 2014, 05:47:48 PM
Quote from: kaworu" post="427176795
I always felt that Silence of the Lambs is quintessentially Clarice Starling's movie, her story.  It's really a sort of feminist take on the bildungsroman, the classical story of the character who comes of age and passes into adulthood.  The whole film is constantly reminding you that this is Starling's film: the film is absolutely chock full of head-on shots of either Starling staring directly at the camera, or people she is talking to or whose gaze she is meeting staring directly at the camera (at her).   

Thus the film circumvents the "male gaze" you would typically get in a film of this genre/type (serial killers and manhuts) because we are constantly seeing all of this through the eyes of this intelligent, driven young woman.  My favorite shots in the film are some of the ones I mentioned, especially when you get these head-on shots of male characters looking at her with varying degrees of lechery in their eyes.  Makes the fascinating comment that so many women are silently viewed as sexual objects in a similar sort of way to how Buffalo Bill sees his victims only as objects. 

So I sort of view Clarice as this sort of feminist superhero whose virtues are that she's just terribly clever, sharp, and open.  She shares several key attributes with Will that make them both attractive to Hannibal:  Both Will and Clarice have a nature frankness and respectfulness with which they treat both others and themselves, and they are both strongly intuitive, and almost always have the correct intuition.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: CharlesXavierRex on March 19, 2014, 08:00:27 PM
I thought deadpool was really gonna suck when aatrek picked him for the new mod and announced it with this "congrats new mod" thread that was only a picture of some faggy cosplayer dancing with swords. but thats how aatrek communicates... all by gif or sexual assault. Guess we all lucked out.  Somehow deadpool turned out to be really good. Rarely probating or banning anyone. he just takes a chill approach even with shit you know some losers will report and probably whine about over PM.

Wanna talk scumfuck mods? Lets go back to VARGO, who somehow is worse than penismighter (a colossal self-righteous faggot), who was already worse than ProffesorClumsy (british). Most recently he lost his shit when fyad easily trolled CD over and over by just saying faggot and  he called daddy ralp to stop the bad men and their naughty words when they wouldnt stop after he gave everyone the dreaded 6 hour probations (lol).  Big surprise that people who think everything is a secret symbol dont actually understand basic social shit behind "u mad?" that everyone else figured out as a kid on the playground.

Vargo also made the lamest mod challenge ever seen on the forums... this one poster was always putting the year of movies after the movie he talks about and VARGO finds this pretentious (ironic i know) so with great fanfare he used his tinpot hallmonitor powers to announce a \\\\\\MOD CHALLENGE/////   where that poster had to... stop putting dates after movies for one month or he'd be probabted for... unspecified time, however if they accomplish it he will win... unspecified forum thing.  wow. such luls.  A bunch of CD posters called him out on being an unfunny faggot so he used his powers again to make them shut up because that all that happened 10 pages earlier---in equivalent white noise Gen Chat shitposting that translates to 2 hours earlier

shitty unfunny front page movie "reviewer" who tries to passes off his stuff as comedy there and as a serious review job on his resume (failing at both) turns out to be shitty unfunny mod?? wow another shocker.

I looked for the quotes in the CD gen chat thread but gave up. Jesus Fuck. Its thousands of pages of self described autistics posting every thought they have. Only 6 months old and already over 1500 posts by this scrappy doo motherfucker named LITERALLY THE WORST (formally known as DICKEYE).... an autistic little bitchboy who both whines about the retards from his "job" at a comic book store constantly and uses his own retard powers to assert his authority on anime, comic books, wrestling, and perpetual virginity.

Even the admins hated dickeye enough to give him the name "literally the worst" in a renaming thread and the literal sperg doesnt even get the wiff of a hint that he might not have FIFTEEN HUNDRED POSTS worth of insight for a thread.  That greasy fuck would be lucky to have 1500 insightful thoughts in his life.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on March 19, 2014, 08:43:01 PM
Was Aatrek actually that bad of a mod outside of his Star Trek thread? I don't remember him being as bad of a mod than most others.

Outside of the ST thread, he was fucking terrible too.

He was the one who even instituted the fucking commercials are spoilers policies.  I understand not wanting to be "spoiled" at actual plot developments, but you're a fucking child if you can't even watch a commercial without losing your mind.

I dont remember him banning people for SJW as much as he just forbade any conversation that wasn't on his approved list. He was a fucking coward though, so if he saw a thread was filled with people talking about something he didn't like, he'd just passive agressively change the subject.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: regged for last read post on March 19, 2014, 09:19:12 PM
The whole 'spoilers' thing is a bunch of bullshit anyway. People just use it as an excuse to whine about something. If the story hinges on some shocking twist then its probably worthless.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on March 20, 2014, 12:42:08 AM
Quote from: kaworu" post="427176795
I always felt that Silence of the Lambs is quintessentially Clarice Starling's movie, her story.  It's really a sort of feminist take on the bildungsroman, the classical story of the character who comes of age and passes into adulthood.  The whole film is constantly reminding you that this is Starling's film: the film is absolutely chock full of head-on shots of either Starling staring directly at the camera, or people she is talking to or whose gaze she is meeting staring directly at the camera (at her).   

Thus the film circumvents the "male gaze" you would typically get in a film of this genre/type (serial killers and manhuts) because we are constantly seeing all of this through the eyes of this intelligent, driven young woman.  My favorite shots in the film are some of the ones I mentioned, especially when you get these head-on shots of male characters looking at her with varying degrees of lechery in their eyes.  Makes the fascinating comment that so many women are silently viewed as sexual objects in a similar sort of way to how Buffalo Bill sees his victims only as objects. 

So I sort of view Clarice as this sort of feminist superhero whose virtues are that she's just terribly clever, sharp, and open.  She shares several key attributes with Will that make them both attractive to Hannibal:  Both Will and Clarice have a nature frankness and respectfulness with which they treat both others and themselves, and they are both strongly intuitive, and almost always have the correct intuition.

Why is it anytime a women that is either smart or likable on screen has to ALWAYS be a feminist champion to goons?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on March 20, 2014, 01:11:58 AM
What could he have done? What would have happened if he had posted in the mod forum "I disagree with how Aatrek moderates TVIV?"

The same thing he's doing now. Say he thinks Aatrek is a shitty mod who made dumb decisions. This isn't a job they need to support their family, it's some dumb internet moderator position on a dying forum.

If he wanted to fit in and not ruffle feathers, that's fine. But it's cowardly to step up and trash him after he's gone. Others did the same shit with BroJo, Noni, sba, and all the others.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on March 20, 2014, 02:17:26 AM
Quote from: kaworu" post="427176795
I always felt that Silence of the Lambs is quintessentially Clarice Starling's movie, her story.  It's really a sort of feminist take on the bildungsroman, the classical story of the character who comes of age and passes into adulthood.  The whole film is constantly reminding you that this is Starling's film: the film is absolutely chock full of head-on shots of either Starling staring directly at the camera, or people she is talking to or whose gaze she is meeting staring directly at the camera (at her).   

Thus the film circumvents the "male gaze" you would typically get in a film of this genre/type (serial killers and manhuts) because we are constantly seeing all of this through the eyes of this intelligent, driven young woman.  My favorite shots in the film are some of the ones I mentioned, especially when you get these head-on shots of male characters looking at her with varying degrees of lechery in their eyes.  Makes the fascinating comment that so many women are silently viewed as sexual objects in a similar sort of way to how Buffalo Bill sees his victims only as objects. 

So I sort of view Clarice as this sort of feminist superhero whose virtues are that she's just terribly clever, sharp, and open.  She shares several key attributes with Will that make them both attractive to Hannibal:  Both Will and Clarice have a nature frankness and respectfulness with which they treat both others and themselves, and they are both strongly intuitive, and almost always have the correct intuition.

Why is it anytime a women that is either smart or likable on screen has to ALWAYS be a feminist champion to goons?

Because usually women are stupid and unlikable?  :jesse:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on March 20, 2014, 02:25:44 PM
Why is it anytime a women that is either smart or likable on screen has to ALWAYS be a feminist champion to goons?

Well, if things I agree with are automatically good, then things that are good must automatically be things I agree with.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on March 20, 2014, 05:45:40 PM
Quote from: Rapey Joe Stalin
Really? American drama as a whole is permeated with racism and stereotyping against muslims and arabs, and that is ignoring that this programme's central premise is the abduction of a pretty blonde girl into Arabian slavery.

It would be nice if this was an intelligent and thought provoking drama on a par with The Wire, but let's be honest, that's pretty fucking unlikely.
:goonthink:

Quote from: Ravane
Well, as far as I've seen [in Dubai at least], if you're not a citizen or a tourist, you're probably a slave. :P But in all seriousness, the premise can be about Arabian abductors and not be racist. There's no reason to be pc about it, it's the same as having a white guy or a black guy being the abductor. As long as it isn't, "I'm abducting you because I'm a-rab and this is what we do."

They can still present it without being racist. But I don't know about ABC's history, I've never heard of the 700 club so I don't know if they have a history of racism. But I'm optimistic about the plot.

Quote from: IRQ
It's a religious conservative show so yes, quite.

However that's only aired out of contractual obligation. The network itself is just ABC stuff. So while this new show may not be racist, although it sounds like it is, it does sound completely horrible in every way.
:goon:

Quote from: Rapey Joe Stalin
I didn't say it was impossible to do it without being racist, but that given the baggage American media brings to the table the likelihood is that it will be.

Do you want to expand on and perhaps clarify what you mean by the phrase "There's no reason to be pc about it"

because on the face of it my response would be 'fuck off'.
:librage:

Quote from: IRQ
Even if it isn't explicitly racist, can we at least agree that the premise is one giant extended version of that one episode of 24 where Jack Bauer takes over a gun store and the conveniently arab gun store owners owners who love america and freedom join him in defending freedom against the filthy mooslim terrorists?

It sounds like "One of the Good Ones: The Series." With a huge huge helping of "pretty white girl leads the browns to enlightenment." I just don't see how it goes any other way.
   :madgoon:

Quote from: raditts
I was going to go with "Noble Savage: Arabic Edition", just knowing TV in general and the monochromatic racial diversity in ABC Family shows in particular.
:goonthink:

Quote from: Rapey Joe Stalin
I'm saying it's most likely going to be racist because:
A) Most American film and TV writing approaches Arabs and Muslims from somewhere on a scale between "ignorant stereotyping" and "I put on my hood and wizards robe".
B) It is playing with a pre-existing cultural meme focussed on the fear of religion and miscegenation as represented by white Americans girls being abducted by sheiks for the harem.

I most certainly wasn't inferring that it would be fine if only it were about a white lady being kidnapped by an African tribe, and I'm not sure how you even began to approach that reading.

I'm not even sure how to begin discussing the larger problem if your yardstick is something like that gif. Which, as Raditts pointed out, basically is 24 in a nutshell.
:ultlibrage:  :algore:  :ultlibrage:



Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on March 20, 2014, 05:52:13 PM
Those are a lot of words for, "i care and know more about television arabs and their plight than i do about those in my local and global community".
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: wtb jewpocalypse on March 20, 2014, 07:50:50 PM
Wanna talk scumfuck mods? Lets go back to VARGO, who somehow is worse than penismighter (a colossal self-righteous faggot), who was already worse than ProffesorClumsy (british). Most recently he lost his shit when fyad easily trolled CD over and over by just saying faggot and  he called daddy ralp to stop the bad men and their naughty words when they wouldnt stop after he gave everyone the dreaded 6 hour probations (lol).  Big surprise that people who think everything is a secret symbol dont actually understand basic social shit behind "u mad?" that everyone else figured out as a kid on the playground.

Vargo also made the lamest mod challenge ever seen on the forums... this one poster was always putting the year of movies after the movie he talks about and VARGO finds this pretentious (ironic i know) so with great fanfare he used his tinpot hallmonitor powers to announce a \\\\\\MOD CHALLENGE/////   where that poster had to... stop putting dates after movies for one month or he'd be probabted for... unspecified time, however if they accomplish it he will win... unspecified forum thing.  wow. such luls.  A bunch of CD posters called him out on being an unfunny faggot so he used his powers again to make them shut up because that all that happened 10 pages earlier---in equivalent white noise Gen Chat shitposting that translates to 2 hours earlier

shitty unfunny front page movie "reviewer" who tries to passes off his stuff as comedy there and as a serious review job on his resume (failing at both) turns out to be shitty unfunny mod?? wow another shocker.

Quote from: Vargo" post="426924328
:siren:MARCH MADNESS MARCH MOD CHALLENGE:siren:

SubG (2004), I am tired of seeing this shit. Did the italics and the year in parentheses really add anything to that statement? Were you worried that without it, we'd confuse that film with the 2000 Steve Harvey/Bernie Mac standup documentary The Kings of Comedy? Why do you do this? Why do you insist on every post looking like a textbook citation?

SubG, for the rest of the month, all movie titles you post anywhere in CineD must be in plain-text, without the year they were released mentioned behind them. If you do, I will probate you for a period of time to be determined at my leisure. If you succeed, I will grant you a forums gift of your choice.

If you need to specify the year because the film in question is a remake, that is acceptable, but don't try it with a film like The Avengers, where everyone knows which movie you're talking about dammit.

(The rest of you, feel free to report this if you see it.)

Quote from: Vargo" post="426925844
Am I seriously the only one who finds it pretentious as shit?

Mostly I just want to see if he can do it.

Quote from: Vargo" post="426938712
Jesus, I was not expecting this kind of anarchy to break out.

Someone post something positive already.

How about that new Godzilla(2014) and Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (2014) movies? Those look pretty sweet, huh? Talk about those.

EDIT: Do not let any of the bullshit from the previous page spill onto this new one.

*joke*

Quote from: Vargo" post="426951750
Don't start this shit again.

*criticism*

Quote from: Vargo" post="426957295
You need to stop.

Quote from: Vargo" post="426957749
I did not expect this level of backlash for an insanely easy challenge which has very little bearing on anyone. Hell, it's not even like I told him to stop doing it forever. He can do it all he wants in April, and I will be proven wrong for thinking he couldn't do it for two weeks. Honestly, this is a minute detail and it led to some of the funniest posts in this thread for a while, but someo of you are really throwing a disproportionate fit about this. If SubG chooses to just not post for two weeks, we will survive, I assure you.

Please remember: You are getting upset because one man on the internet temporarily challenged another man on the internet because of his formatting habits. Even if you think this challenge was petty instead o fun, the fact that we're still talking about it 24 hours later is ridiculous.

three days later

Quote from: Wandle Cax" post="427055522
Race the Sun (1996) (Halle Berry, Casey Affleck) (key grip Danny Lockett) is a very hot movie indeed.

Quote from: Vargo" post="427055594
I'm very happy that this has become a thing, sincerely.

 :facepalm:

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on March 26, 2014, 02:53:19 AM
I shit you not, apparently Godzilla and movie monster films have sexist overtones, people. Just kill me now:

Quote from: K. Waste" post="427452699
If we're discussing low rent rip-offs of Godzilla, we shouldn't be talking about Gamera (he's a low rent subversion of Godzilla). We should be talking Gappa and The X from Outer Space. I was so excited to see both of those, hoping maybe I'd find a hidden jem, and all I got was awful sexism and dominant ideology like every American creature-feature you've ever forgotten if you've seen or not so you saw it again.

That's another thing, can we talk about gender politics and Godzilla? I mean, it seems like the new movie has a pretty prominent female supporting cast (just going by wiki),and one thing that struck me the most about Honda's Godzilla films is how eerily the destruction that the monsters cause is tied to sexual oppression: Emiko and Ogata have their strangely clinical but nonetheless overtly sexual relationship [/u](there's interesting overtones prescient of the opening scene of Psycho, and clearly related to Honda's admiration of Noir, as evidenced in the excellent H-Man); Mothra vs. Godzilla features a perpetually virgin goddess religion, the god of which ultimately 'binds' the oppressive father god after reincarnating herself and plunging him into the sea; Ghidorah had the brother clearly disapproving of his sister's progressive dating habits, but ultimately coming to forget those things when shit hit the fan; Terror of Mechagodzilla has a tragic slave figure in Katsura, literally torn into and manipulated by the business men from the Black Hole...


Now, of course, it's usually the ONE woman in these pictures, so, you know.

CineD: Den of absolute faggotry much?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on March 26, 2014, 04:18:14 AM
Please rename this thread "Can we talk about gender politics and Godzilla?".
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on March 26, 2014, 05:20:01 AM
what ever happened to having a beer and watching the funny moving pictures?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on March 26, 2014, 05:22:54 AM
People that aren't on the autism spectrum still do that regularly.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on March 26, 2014, 01:27:45 PM
what ever happened to having a beer and watching the funny moving pictures?

I've seen "What's so wrong with just wanting to kick back and watch a movie without thinking too hard about it?" start virtual fistfights in CineD. Some of them are enraged at the idea of not deconstructing every bit of media they consume and seem personally offended that somebody wants to watch Piranha 3DD without writing a thesis afterwards.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on March 26, 2014, 01:37:24 PM
Remember when cd required all movie titles to be in bold with year in parentheses?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on March 26, 2014, 01:54:39 PM
Please rename this thread "Can we talk about gender politics and Godzilla?".
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Procrustes on March 26, 2014, 05:23:04 PM
Please rename this thread "Can we talk about gender politics and Godzilla?".
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on March 28, 2014, 10:56:19 AM
what ever happened to having a beer and watching the funny moving pictures?

I've seen "What's so wrong with just wanting to kick back and watch a movie without thinking too hard about it?" start virtual fistfights in CineD. Some of them are enraged at the idea of not deconstructing every bit of media they consume and seem personally offended that somebody wants to watch Piranha 3DD without writing a thesis afterwards.

Those of us who are employed and have lives outside of consuming media can easily enjoy movies and TV without analyzing any part of it. Its just an escape. For the cine d and tviv crew it is their life. They justify their constant consumption of media by trying to make it academic, which is the only other thing they know.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on March 28, 2014, 12:04:57 PM
for prof clumsy and vargo it literally is their life. Like not even joking, they are film analysis type majors.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on March 28, 2014, 12:12:51 PM
Those of us who are employed and have lives outside of consuming media can easily enjoy movies and TV without analyzing any part of it. Its just an escape. For the cine d and tviv crew it is their life. They justify their constant consumption of media by trying to make it academic, which is the only other thing they know.

The funniest thing is how AV Club reviews are now considered word of god. It's funny as hell that people watch an episode of a tv series and immediately go and a read a review of what they watched so that they can read some 888 about what actually happened and what all the ~~deep and meaningful~~ subtexts are.

Here's a snippet of a random Av club tv episode review:
Quote
And yet, just listen to the way that Jeff Perry pronounces the word “pleasure” when describing how Jake serves the president. There’s a hitch in his voice, almost as if the very word gets stuck in Cyrus’ throat, suggesting that there’s almost no “pleasure” in anything described in that last paragraph. Why? Because “pleasure” has no real place in Scandal. You could call it “carnal lust,” or “animal desire,” or a host of other pre- or post-conscious impulses. But in a show in which everyone often mistakes passion for love, “pleasure” is absent.
:888:

It's even funnier when people are too busy liveposting HOLKY FUCK 10 times a minute and completely miss what's going on and have to be told afterwards.

In CD I somehow understand the whole analyzing thing since a bunch of them are film studies faggots with no actual grasp of reality, but in TVIV it's ludicrous.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Internet Catchphrase on March 28, 2014, 12:52:25 PM
Here I just marathoned Breaking Bad instead of going outside all weekend let me post this philosophy screed so I feel like I'm not wasting my life:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on March 30, 2014, 11:36:12 PM
Quote from: Rapey Joe Stalin
I couldn't care less about sports in general, and will only make an effort to watch top level Snooker on the telly (because god damn that is a game of sublime skill and psychological drama) once or twice a year. I think American Football is the dullest, dumbest physical activity imaginable, and that the American attitude to sport in education is contemptible.
Friday Night Lights overcame my prejudice towards it's premise by being a supremely well made and acted drama. And yeah, it helps that the programme is honest in it's love of the game, with an awareness of how corrosive it is within the context of education.
                                                      :say:
                                        :goon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on March 31, 2014, 05:01:20 PM
Quote from: Rapey Joe Stalin
Friday Night Lights overcame my prejudice towards it's premise by being a supremely well made and acted drama. And yeah, it helps that the programme is honest in it's love of the game, with an awareness of how corrosive it is within the context of education.
                                                      :say:
                                        :goon:

It's always LOL when goons try REALLY hard to make Friday Night Lights into a sublime academic pursuit but can't use the right "its" while doing so.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: gaaaayyyyyy on April 01, 2014, 03:28:14 AM
That guy who wrote the idiotic D&D topic about Vice has a lot of things to say about How I met Your Mother:

Quote from: Finnin" post="427701286
So let us examine the cultural legacy and messages in this shown.

Ted Mosby, virtually a psychopath, a very very bad horrible no good person, who constantly does the wrong thing, is considered by all his friends to constantly do the wrong thing, and honestly is hated by most of the fans, ends up getting a wife. Not only that she dies. And he gets another girl too. All despite being nothing but a scumbag for the vast majority of the period past the first couple of seasons.

What a great message to send to people. Thanks a lot tv show.

Oh let us not forget the sex obsessed (read addicted) Barney who copes with his own feelings of incompleteness due to never knowing his father by being generally a misogynist/horrible person/borderline rapist finally falls in love with a girl and after a long period of "change" to actually get over his mental issues finally marries her only to actually be revealed to have lied the entire time 3 years later when he divorces. And the woman he divorces ends up getting with the other psychopath in the show.

What a gigantic pile of garbage.

They should've called it inexcusable wastes of humanity no woman should ever consider going near: the series.

Oh and Robin is proven to have horrible taste in men. Probably due to never being validated as a women by her father.

This show has taught me a lot about the quality of mental health in America. Thanks a lot!


Quote from: Finnin" post="427702729
I am railing about certain characters on the show who are misogynistic never suffering any consequences for their actions.


:ultlibrage: JUST WORLD FALLACY!!!! :ultlibrage:

More 888 here http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3570831&userid=209344
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on April 01, 2014, 08:29:40 AM

I do like how a guy whose successful with the women is a "borderline rapist" now.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on April 01, 2014, 09:52:12 AM
Im just gonna be a snob and say if you write screeds about sitcom characters like they're real prople you're an uncultured twat and should probably just fuck off back to playing video games and let the big boys talk
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Procrustes on April 01, 2014, 03:16:45 PM
Anyone getting that mad at a fucking stupid network sitcom should be put up against a wall and shot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on April 01, 2014, 03:26:51 PM
Anyone getting that mad at a fucking stupid network sitcom should be put up against a wall and shot.

Quote from: Bown" post="427707231
I started watching How I Met Your Mother when it first aired in the UK when I was 15, and I realised right before watching the finale that it's the TV show that's been a part of my life for the longest period.

This isn't a good night for me.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on April 01, 2014, 03:36:38 PM
MOTHER FUCKING SITCOMS!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 01, 2014, 03:42:12 PM
Someone whose cultural identity and social conditioning is informed by shitty sitcoms sounds like a character from a shitty sitcom.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on April 01, 2014, 04:04:35 PM
MOTHER FUCKING SITCOMS!

 :nah:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: mart on April 01, 2014, 05:07:21 PM
I live with somebody who gets mad at sitcoms for not going the way he wants and he's the biggest attention whoring annoying bitch, I can't wait to tell him to fuck off when his contract's up.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on April 01, 2014, 05:50:36 PM
I live with somebody who gets mad at sitcoms for not going the way he wants and he's the biggest attention whoring annoying bitch, I can't wait to tell him to fuck off when his contract's up.

Like, how mad does he get?  WE need examples.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Procrustes on April 01, 2014, 05:53:29 PM
Anyone getting that mad at a fucking stupid network sitcom should be put up against a wall and shot.

Quote from: Bown" post="427707231
I started watching How I Met Your Mother when it first aired in the UK when I was 15, and I realised right before watching the finale that it's the TV show that's been a part of my life for the longest period.

This isn't a good night for me.
:polonium:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rockchalk on April 10, 2014, 01:04:08 PM
Quote
Man, Inside Amy Schumer is such a mixed bag. You have good sketches like the video game one, but they're hidden beneath the mountain of gross-out jokes about sex and vaginas.

I don't even know where to start here...the gooniest manchild post in the world demanding less "gross stuff like sex and vaginas" in favor of exclusively jokes about videogames, or the fact that what might be the funniest show on TV right now is written by & starring a feminist woman comedian but the feminism thread will never notice or care because they're all humorless headcases capable only of complaining.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 13, 2014, 10:32:19 PM
Anyone that watches Hannibal knows that it's probably the most ridiculous and absurd shite on TV at the moment. Entertaining enough - true - but absolutely fucking ludicrous and far-fetched to the point of being hilarious and with a villain who seems able to control time, matter, space, the minds of other people and all aspects of the plot. And so in the past few episodes where Hannibal has offed two armed FBI agents without as much as a scratch and posed their corpses; killed a guy, let a fucking tree grow through him and then moved the whole thing to the middle of a parking lot (by himself); abducted a famous serial killer from a hospital, took him home after stringing his guard up with fishing lines and then transferred the same guy plus an entire surgical suite to another guy's house (by himself); brainwashed an FBI agent into shooting another character in custody in the fucking head - blowing his brains all over the camera - which, because this show apparently takes place in "heightened reality and magical realism" means he might still be alive, what are goons complaining about as a potential piece of the plot that doesn't really jive for them?

It's the female character banging the sophisticated, articulate, highly intelligent, attractive, gourmet cook, music-writing Hannibal - a character it's been explained she's known for years - because writers sacrificing strong, intelligent female characters to "love" is an awful overused trope that strains credibility...in a show where all of the above happened in two fucking episodes. This is what bothers them - the one thing that could actually be explained away as plausible. The rest? Not a problem.

TVIV actively makes you want to hate shows just because it's so fucking dumb reading the hoops goons will jump through to avoid having to criticise whatever shit they like watching, to the point where they'll actively start creating side-plots as explanation in their heads. Just say your show has shit writing from time to time; it's no big deal.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on April 14, 2014, 07:58:08 AM
It's that teenage mindset of being "smart and crafty" that goons love.  The whole smarter than authority figures that seems to be their ultimate fantasy.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on April 14, 2014, 04:31:33 PM
It's that teenage mindset of being "smart and crafty" that goons love.  The whole smarter than authority figures that seems to be their ultimate fantasy.

They must be creaming their panties over House of Cards then.  Kevin Spacey's character even digs video games to sell it even harder to that 'games are mainstream art' kind of goon.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 16, 2014, 11:35:39 AM
So, Mike Judge (King of the Hill, Office Space, Idiocracy) has a new tv show called Silicon Valley, about a bunch of aspie losers living together and developing a new revolutionary app that could get them billions of dollars (if they stop being such aspie losers and start acting like grown up about it). It's pretty funny, and the closest to real nerds you'll see on television. I say closest because no network is ever going to make a tv show about four morbidly fat guys living together and generally acting like goons.

It's getting universal acclaim from critics, so of course what's the reaction of TVIV? From the OP:
Quote from: hrceight
The one thing the show has been taking flack for so far is the major gender imbalance in the cast. Monica (Amanda Crew), Peter's assistant, is the only female in the main cast. Given Judge's sometimes wacky politics, it's hard to say if or how he'll respond to the criticism.
Second post:
Quote from: Occupation
I've read several reviews from female tv critics that state that the lack of women on te show is a commentary on the real-life gender politics of Silicon Valley which is apparently one of the big draws of the show (that it so closely resembles how Silicon Valley actually is that it's barely a satire)
Quote from: Darth Windu
Are brogrammers real?
Quote from: Storgar
As a resident of Man Jose, I can tell you this part, at least, is completely realistic.
Quote from: coffeetable
Also while it is an accurate reflection of the tech world, it'd be nice if the startup gained at least one woman on the programming staff. In the meantime, it's cool that the VC's assistant was shown to be the first one to grasp the technical significance of the "compression algorithm".
Quote from: etalian
Yeah due to the massive nerd invasion Santa Clara county has more guys than girls.

Also the show is pretty accurate focusing on the cast makeup since the whole horrible startup/VC culture tends to male dominated.
Quote from: Rexides
The only thing that made me roll my eyes was the "brogrammer" bit. It was just scraping the bottom of the barrel that TBBT left behind, which is weird because the rest of the show was so much better. It felt as if it was there just because it's a thing techies say, and they had to make it literal because who knows why.

Also someone linked to a review and got agitated over it because it said:
Quote from: some article
    I was just having a meeting with my information security team, and they’re great but they’re pretty fucking weird — one used to be a dude, one’s super small, one’s hyper-smart — that’s actually what it is
yeah, nothing fucking weird with cutting your dick off and putting on some fake breasts

For the most part, they've already moved on from gender politics to semi-ironically complaining about this being 'nerd blackface' and they don't really get what it's like to be a nerd, man and it's like, not a funny show if you live there or you're in the industry. At least there is hope:
Quote from: Frackie Robinson
Real strong pilot, this looks like it could be good. Personally I'd rather they stick with an unbalanced cast over pandering to us by needlessly inserting a bunch of female characters into what's obviously a very male-driven setting.
Quote from: Veskit
Did people complain a lot about Mike Judge scraping the bottom of the barrel/going for the easy joke in regards to king of the hill texan/middle america jokes, or are people just more sensitive when it comes to this show? I honestly can't tell.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Petty Hate Machine on April 16, 2014, 01:49:42 PM
I can't stress enough how much I hate TVIV and the pathetic sacks of trash that post there. I can only take comfort in the fact that most of them will die within the opening minutes of Putin's war of ethnic Russian liberation aka WW3.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tits an cooters on April 16, 2014, 10:55:57 PM
So, Mike Judge (King of the Hill, Office Space, Idiocracy)

(http://i.imgur.com/utAFRWn.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 17, 2014, 05:41:17 AM
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3605275

This subject matter in this thread encapsulates everything that is wrong with SJW problem in CineD & TVIV.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on April 17, 2014, 10:43:17 AM
Film Analysis: For when you want to sound smart, but can't speak intelligently about science, politics, or world events.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on April 18, 2014, 05:18:32 PM
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3605275

This subject matter in this thread encapsulates everything that is wrong with SJW problem in CineD & TVIV.

Holy shit that thread is fucking crazy. This is just the 1st page.

Quote from: Terry van Feleday" post="424999602
I'll use Transformers as an example here because of course I would: The trick of the films' operative "more than meets the eye" gimmick is that the overtly-racist imagery is a hideous mask worn upon the true face like the much vaunted (in this case CGI-) blackface itself. However, this "hidden truth" is by no means a full and complete truth - the facade is as much a part of the thing itself as are its innermost expressions. A Transformer is as much a car as it is a robot. When people call the twins a racist expression, then regardless of all additional twists and qualifiers, they are absolutely right.

Quote from: Some Guy TT" post="425027088
We can resolve to do better. From what I can tell, when disability groups made a big point of protesting Tropic Thunder, the people involved at least acknowledged and responded to the complaints respectfully. Even if they didn't make meaningful changes to Tropic Thunder itself, since then we haven't seen any mainstream movies (that I'm aware of) that are as insensitive on the whole retard thing. There had to have been people who wanted to, given the way "go full retard" entered the cultural consciousness.

I would love if we could get that kind of backlash, say, the next time we get a mainstream release that normalizes rape jokes. Yes I know it's possible to make a funny rape joke but most of the time they're just disgusting cheap shots and filmmakers really need to think twice before shoving those in.

Quote from: massive spider" post="425211472
There is something so nihilistic about idealising Scarface that I'd say that the kind of person who does it is probably aware that Tony Montana is a fuckup but also on some level knows that they are too.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on April 18, 2014, 05:37:27 PM
Meet A Steampunk Gent. He has incredibly strong views on the Transformers films.

Quote from: A Steampunk Gent" post="425221557
For example, the black comic relief robots in Transformers which yourself and Lord Krangdar were defending: you made your case that they're an element of a deconstruction of western race relations and capitalist power structures, that's an fair reading and interesting to see discussed on an internet forum. But for the hundreds of thousands of black kids who saw the Transformers films they're just another facet of a media telling them they're inferior, stupid and unworthy of credible representation, they're sure as hell not going to pick up one iota of anything that's been written in Terry's thread on the series and I severely doubt the film's deliberate marginalisation of their race and culture is going to spur them on to become Marxist revolutionaries either, that reeks of accelerationism and the privilege (privilege!) of white theorists who've never actually had to deal with the day-to-day reality of being ignored or caricatured by their society's media.

Quote from: A Steampunk Gent" post="425229247
One of the dominant sociological theories on media (the culturalist theory) suggests that opinion is made in a two way interaction, people do take their own readings from media but the media itself provides a certain level of understanding of our culture, you really don't need to look very far to see shows, 24 for example, which are produced by companies with vested political agendas with the aim of encouraging a political stance in the general populace, in this case an anti-civil liberties pro-torture stance of domestic security. There's plenty of evidence to back this up, just google 'culturalist theory' if you're interested.

Yes, I would like more films which polemically state that racism, classism, sexism and all other forms of oppression are wrong. I can't think of a single film which was better for it's endorsement of bigoted attitudes and I can think of multitudes which are far worse for doing so.

Quote from: A Steampunk Gent" post="425224751
Well we'll have to just agree to disagree at this point, if you don't see why white people swinging around all type of racist imagery in the name of liberal free speech is really shitty and a hugely privileged action I don't know what to say.

If they want to write a positive representation of racial minority as a white person, write a decent representation of a racial minority, don't rehash a well recognised racial stereotype under the murky assumption that it's actually subversive because of reasons practically no-one is ever going read.

Quote from: A Steampunk Gent" post="425223834
Yes. I don't feel I'm making myself clear. I understand the reading, I think it makes the film much more enjoyable approaching it from that angle but most people who saw the film never made that connection, most people took the film's fascism at face value and responded accordingly, that's why sales of the actually fascist graphic novel skyrocketed at the films release, it became a memetic hit on 4chan and  a rallying cry for university lads out on the piss. Very few people ever read it as a satire, even among anti-fascists.

Surely that is the task of actual people of colour though? I really don't see how Michael Bay and whatever hacks wrote the script have the right to wield such charged imagery. Every article I've read on the films' racial representation by actual people of colour has been damningly critical, all I'm seeing here is right nerds defending white nerds.

I had no idea one of the Transformers sequels was so powerful. I thought it was just a dumb action movie where robots blew shit up for a couple hours.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Mullah Omar on April 18, 2014, 06:00:47 PM
Transformers is fascist? I feel like I'm missing something.

Hahahhaah this review; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/23/AR2009062303462.html
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 18, 2014, 06:24:34 PM
tbf that person is right that if you idolize scarface you're most likely a misanthropic piece of shit, or a fat nerd who suffers from arrested development
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on April 18, 2014, 06:28:34 PM
Transformers is fascist? I feel like I'm missing something.

Hahahhaah this review; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/23/AR2009062303462.html

Facist stuff is refering to 300
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 18, 2014, 06:45:56 PM
Goons such and Some Guy TT & A steampunk Gent have been writing huge 888 posts on those "racist robots" (lol) who transform into automobiles for years.  It was amusing to watch SMG troll these faggots though.

 :myecred:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rockchalk on April 18, 2014, 09:06:36 PM
i'm glad I paid $10 for an account to learn that Transformers 3 is a shitty movie, really see the value there
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on April 18, 2014, 09:19:55 PM
Lol about the 'ablooo blooo my subculture' thing.

Say what you want about hippies but at least they were partyin and havin sex and rockin out and even protesting and putting their money where their mouths were instead of crying to their headmates because scooby doo is hippie blackface
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on April 18, 2014, 09:23:30 PM
I think what really gets me about cineD is that for all the forum-wide bitching about gamers and bronies wasting their lives on juvenile entertainment im still stuck reading about why pacific rim is actually a commentary on pre-ww2 japanese imperialism
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rockchalk on April 18, 2014, 09:33:37 PM
No aspect of the goon hivemind is more irritating than when they adopt one random spectacular failure of a popcorn movie every summer and defend it to the death as art. Speed Racer, Battleship, Pacific Rim. What's it gonna be this year?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 18, 2014, 09:38:39 PM
I think what really gets me about cineD is that for all the forum-wide bitching about gamers and bronies wasting their lives on juvenile entertainment im still stuck reading about why pacific rim is actually a commentary on pre-ww2 japanese imperialism

Last time I checked the Godzilla thread a week or so ago some faggot in there with the username K. Waste was going on and on about gender politics within the franchise. Yes, thats right; supposed gender politics in a franchise about a 3000 foot monster destroying cities. All is faggot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on April 18, 2014, 09:45:28 PM
These faggots have no concept of the fact that people will see what they want to see in art and life. Meditate on the plight of strong wymyns enough and even an esurance commercial will seem like a cleverly disguised denouncement.of patriarchy
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on April 18, 2014, 09:53:43 PM

Could you imagine actually sitting down and trying to watch a movie with one of these fruits?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on April 18, 2014, 10:09:48 PM


TVIV actively makes you want to hate shows just because it's so fucking dumb reading the hoops goons will jump through to avoid having to criticise whatever shit they like watching, to the point where they'll actively start creating side-plots as explanation in their heads. Just say your show has shit writing from time to time; it's no big deal.

Damn, you're not exaggerating, I was looking at that thread earlier and they were trashing Hopkins like he's some kind of hack just cuz his portrayal of Lecter is different than the one on their beloved high-art network masterpiece.


Could you imagine actually sitting down and trying to watch a movie with one of these fruits?

If the extremely gay pages of "HOLY FUCK", "WTF", "WOW JUST WOW" play-by-play posts in every tviv thread doesn't make it obvious that these lonely losers never watch anything in the company of other human beings, then the over analysis of every little background detail(including elaborate theories based on clothing colors and interior decorating) that you can only do when freeze-framing something every two seconds does.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on April 18, 2014, 10:32:08 PM

If the extremely gay pages of "HOLY FUCK", "WTF", "WOW JUST WOW"

There was a bit of this but in a triggered sjw-way not as much a play-by-play way + some "really?" and probably some "I just threw up in my mouth a little bit" in the True Blood thread when a desert storm usmc vet True Blood character was about to kill himself and a guy he was in iraq with said "don't do it! suicide's for muslims!"

Yeah because normal people don't disparage the muslim way of life at all, much less people who get to see the worst parts of muslimity. Everyone just loves those smelly exploding faggots.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on April 18, 2014, 11:25:10 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/bcNUAQ0.jpg)
:bronson:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on April 18, 2014, 11:59:29 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/bcNUAQ0.jpg)
:bronson:

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on April 19, 2014, 12:00:55 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/bcNUAQ0.jpg)
:bronson:

Well yeah, that's what makes it good.   :bronson:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: someasshole on April 19, 2014, 01:25:04 AM
I think what really gets me about cineD is that for all the forum-wide bitching about gamers and bronies wasting their lives on juvenile entertainment im still stuck reading about why pacific rim is actually a commentary on pre-ww2 japanese imperialism

Last time I checked the Godzilla thread a week or so ago some faggot in there with the username K. Waste was going on and on about gender politics within the franchise. Yes, thats right; supposed gender politics in a franchise about a 3000 foot monster destroying cities. All is faggot.

The first one at least gets brought up in academic circles as something that relates to Japan getting nuked to shit. It's not about fucking feminism, though.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 19, 2014, 03:07:15 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/bcNUAQ0.jpg)
:bronson:

Well yeah, that's what makes it good.   :bronson:

I've always liked Dirty Harry more than Death Wish.  :clint:

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on April 19, 2014, 09:18:21 AM
Death Wish is the greatest movie series of all time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvSwpljtxlg

 :bronson: :bronson: :bronson: :bronson: :bronson:

tbf that person is right that if you idolize scarface you're most likely a nigger

ftfy
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 19, 2014, 03:02:57 PM
Death Wish is the greatest movie series of all time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvSwpljtxlg

Ahem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSfkoFA7UCY

This is what needs to happen to every murderer, rapist, etc.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on April 19, 2014, 03:56:41 PM
Everyone should read about the early life of Charles Bronson. Here's a snippet.

Quote
Roger Ebert visited the wintry New York City set of Death Wish – the film that ultimately made Bronson a star in America – in January 1974, the actor consented to a rare interview.

Extremely private and reserved off camera, Bronson admitted how rough his childhood was. "I remember my father had shaved us all bald to avoid lice," he recalled. "Times were poor. I wore hand-me-downs. And because the kids just older than me in the family were girls, sometimes I had to wear my sisters' hand-me-downs. I remember going to school in a dress. And my socks, when I got home sometimes I'd have to take them off and give them to my brother to wear into the mines" [Bronson had 14 siblings].
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on April 19, 2014, 04:07:36 PM
charles bronson is a tranny
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on April 19, 2014, 04:12:00 PM
Men wear dresses too, I thought there were enough threads covering that already?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on April 19, 2014, 04:50:15 PM
charles bronson is a tranny

john wayne was a fag

you're mistaken that's John Wayne Gacy  :johnwayne:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 20, 2014, 04:15:20 AM
The plan for this Hannibal shit is for its narrative to run through each of Thomas Harris' books, touching on each of the main killers in sequence. Lecter hasn't even been caught yet in show but, naturally, goons are already worrying about how Buffalo Bill is going to be portrayed and how - obviously - he should be "reworked".

Quote
This brings up something else I've been wondering... Buffalo Bill was a very interesting villain and his objectifying women for their skin was a brilliant, brilliant symbol of men objectifying women throughout the whole movie. Buuuuut at the same time it unfortunately demonizes and perpetuates stereotypes about transsexuals. I'm really curious what Fuller has in mind for reworking this character.

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3611406&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=104#post428536905

And the thread just spirals from there.

Quote
It's not that he is supposed to reflect the behavior of trans people, it's that it's using an already otherised person and then portraying them as a deviant, which in a lot of people's mind is going to, unfortunately, end up with the two being conflated. It's a tricky situation because obviously you don't want to create a situation where, for instance, a trans person is incapable of being portrayed as an antagonist, but at the same time it's a potentially damaging treatment when the portrayal comes from a place of ignorance, even if there is no malicious intent. The book did a bit better of a job with Buffalo Bill than the movie, but, as pointed out above, Harris had kind of a problematic take on Margot's sexuality.

edit: He's a crossdresser, and Hannibal states that he at least thinks he's transsexual (which a lot of people take a problem with as well).

They're also increasingly frequently telling each other how glad they are that the current show is eschewing any sexual content in any of the crimes (in a show based on books about sexual serial killers), so whilst goons have no problem with, say, seeing a totem pole made out out of dismembered bodies, a man being butchered and fed his own leg, throats being slit and tongues being pulled through the hole, or characters being cut up with band saws and their bodies being displayed in slices, God forbid anyone forcibly grabs a tit in the name of adult plotting.

(http://cdn.wegotthiscovered.com/wp-content/uploads/Hannibal09-1.jpg)

Leaving the retarded network TV fuckery aside (which means they can show this sort of thing (http://theculturebinge.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/screen-shot-2013-04-28-at-6-05-54-pm.png) but have to CGI edit in blood to cover the bare asses), it's so fucking weird that they revel and fanwank about the constant new hyper-violence and gore and the way in which it's presented and framed but balk at the suggestion that the show's horror should include any of the (actually realistic, given the proclivities of serial killers) sexual content from the books.

Also, I'm reposting the Jonathan Demme quote for the lulz:

Quote
[Buffalo Bill] wasn't a gay character. He was a tormented man who hated himself and wished he was a woman because that would have made him as far away from himself as he possibly could be.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on April 20, 2014, 06:04:36 AM


Don't forget that next week's episode of this classy, intellectual series involves a serial killer murdering people with a mechanized werewolf suit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on April 20, 2014, 07:50:25 AM
I love the books, I really do.  Even choked my way through Hannibal Rising when it first came out.  But the more I hear about this series, the more I avoid it like the plague.  Seems to be "Staxxx of CGI Bodies: the Series!  (But no boob stuff)"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 20, 2014, 09:19:01 AM
"I can't wait to see the artistic flair, composition of shots of the bodies and use of color and contrast (really making the arterial blood splashes pop out, for instance) Brian Fuller will bring to the Tooth Fairy crime scenes but is there any way the show can rewrite the material so that the women are already dead of natural causes just before Dolarhyde gets there so we don't have to listen to any sexual stuff?"
      :say:
    :unparsons:


Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on April 20, 2014, 09:29:35 AM
I love the books, I really do.  Even choked my way through Hannibal Rising when it first came out.  But the more I hear about this series, the more I avoid it like the plague.  Seems to be "Staxxx of CGI Bodies: the Series!  (But no boob stuff)"

It's actually really good
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 20, 2014, 11:03:36 AM
The Hannibal thread is pretty terrible yeah. They've also been bitching non-stop since Hannibal hooked up with a woman at some point, because they don't think he should be a sexual being and it doesn't fit his characterization etc.... They are talking about Hannibal who was obsessed with Clarice non-stop and the canon ending of the books is that he escapes and lives forever happy banging Clarice in South America and shit.

These people are the neo-puritans, they more or less have the same views regarding sex and sexuality (except with more rolly polly polys)

I love the books, I really do.  Even choked my way through Hannibal Rising when it first came out.  But the more I hear about this series, the more I avoid it like the plague.  Seems to be "Staxxx of CGI Bodies: the Series!  (But no boob stuff)"

You definitely should check it out, it is really great
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on April 20, 2014, 11:12:45 AM
What makes a goon have a tantrum:
Admitting that they want to see a boob
Putting the wrong things on their hotdog
Their long awaited videogame not being exactly as in their daydreams.
Something to do with comicbooks
Being told that they're too old to watch cartoons

They are fat sheltered children, not puritans.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on April 20, 2014, 11:44:02 AM
Do you still censor middle fingers on US tv? That's like the funniest thing in the world
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: mart on April 20, 2014, 12:44:34 PM
I love the books, I really do.  Even choked my way through Hannibal Rising when it first came out.  But the more I hear about this series, the more I avoid it like the plague.  Seems to be "Staxxx of CGI Bodies: the Series!  (But no boob stuff)"

It's actually really good

Yeah, it's a good show but like almost everything goons latch on to the fanbase is fucking terrible.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 20, 2014, 12:56:36 PM
When goons latch onto certain shows, they have no problems accepting *toxic* and problematic~ things in tv shows. The more they love 'em, the more they can ignore. Orphan Black is about a show about clone and one of their big thing is that most of differences between the clones are due to nurture versus nature as they all turn out very differently.

Well one of them turns out to be a leftist, hippie lesbian. The others are all heterosexual with boyfriends and ex-boyfriends. They are essentially saying that homosexuality is also one of these things that depends on nurture. Any other show would get tumblr and :madgoon: but it's a nerd favorite so they give it a pass
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on April 20, 2014, 01:06:22 PM
Yeah, it's a good show but like almost everything goons latch on to the fanbase is fucking terrible.

I haven't actually checked the thread in two weeks or something, but up till then it was surprisingly tolerable. Only when Hettienne Park was killed and everybody started wailing about how it's sexism and how dare they kill strong asian womyn there was a dip in quality, even after Park herself posted a blog basically saying "shut up you fucking idiots".

Then again 99% of TV/IV threads go to shit eventually.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on April 20, 2014, 01:06:57 PM
I'd nail Tatiana Maslany whether or not she wanted it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 20, 2014, 01:18:13 PM
i'm pretty sure there's no scenario where she'd ever want you to fall on top of her, no
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on April 20, 2014, 01:21:16 PM
You never know!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 20, 2014, 02:46:20 PM
Do you still censor middle fingers on US tv? That's like the funniest thing in the world

The censorship on regular TV in the US is still fucking absurd. I'm very skeptical of watching TV shows outside of HBO/Showtime, etc. for that very reason (not to mention fucking commercial breaks).
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on April 20, 2014, 03:45:13 PM
Do you still censor middle fingers on US tv? That's like the funniest thing in the world

The censorship on regular TV in the US is still fucking absurd. I'm very skeptical of watching TV shows outside of HBO/Showtime, etc. for that very reason (not to mention fucking commercial breaks).

Completely agreed.  The furthest I'll go for TV shows in terms of networks are Comedy Central, AMC, and F/X.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on April 20, 2014, 04:09:58 PM
Speaking of Hannibal:

Quote from: Spatula City" post="428560549
I really want to watch more Hannibal, but each of the three episodes I watch was a FUCKING TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCE, HOLY SHIT. I mean, that's a credit to how well done the show is, but I had to stop between watching the pilot and the second episode so I could cry for a few minutes. I'm not entirely sure I can emotionally handle Hannibal. :smith:

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: someasshole on April 20, 2014, 04:51:09 PM
Hannibal's a pretty entertaining show.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 20, 2014, 04:54:53 PM
Speaking of Hannibal:

Quote from: Spatula City" post="428560549
I really want to watch more Hannibal, but each of the three episodes I watch was a FUCKING TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCE, HOLY SHIT. I mean, that's a credit to how well done the show is, but I had to stop between watching the pilot and the second episode so I could cry for a few minutes. I'm not entirely sure I can emotionally handle Hannibal. :smith:

this is a straight-up mentally broken person, and the fact that this is who SA attracts in 2014 says everything you need to know about the current state of the place
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on April 20, 2014, 07:02:26 PM
Yeah, that Hannibal thread has gone full faggot

also,  :lolno: at that Fuller fag who makes Hannibal pandering to the internet activists and tumblr tards
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 20, 2014, 07:48:31 PM
On Buffalo Bill again:

Quote
It's kind of an odd thing to discuss anyways because, aside from Lecter saying he just thinks he's a transsexual (I think the book alternates between the term transsexual and transgendered, but I might be misremembering), I don't believe they actually go into any more detail as to what his situation actually is, certainly not from his perspective at least. There's probably a whole can of worms that could be opened about a heterosexual male declaring that someone just "thinks" they are trans anyway, but Fuller's comments on Margot and his interview commentary in general leave me zero reason to be worried about how they might portray Bill in this show.

I love that the eminently qualified psychologist Lecter's normally engrossing preternatural perception and ability to deconstruct and psychologically profile people - his entire schtick and the reason he's in the plot in the first place, NEVER MIND THE FACT THAT HE'S SHOWN TO BE FUCKING RIGHT - is now problematic when it comes to trannies because he's straight and cis and only trannies are allowed to analyze each other. He can fucking nail and see through someone like Clarice Starling five minutes after first meeting her and based on piddly shit like her accent and her fucking shoes but it's really out of line and possibly wrong that he suggest a transsexual has issues. Fucking goons, man....
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Monostats Infected Scrotum on April 20, 2014, 07:57:08 PM
Hannibal Lecter in any format is saner than troons will ever be.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hashtag Activist on April 20, 2014, 08:11:45 PM
*sniffsniff* I can smell your four months of hormones
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on April 20, 2014, 08:21:16 PM
A bigot cisdoctor once tried to gatekeep me. I ate my lady-cock with some testicles and a nice bottle of horse piss.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 20, 2014, 08:39:07 PM
Hannibal Lecter in any format is saner than troons will ever be.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on April 21, 2014, 12:10:24 AM
I'm convinced that goons literally sit in front of the TV with a notepad literally marking down what minorities, sexualities and "genders" they see.

Its incredible to me.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on April 21, 2014, 12:20:48 PM
Yesterday's game of thrones had a rapey scene, evacuate the fucking internet.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on April 21, 2014, 12:35:46 PM
I'm convinced that goons literally sit in front of the TV with a notepad literally marking down what minorities, sexualities and "genders" they see.

Its incredible to me.

There are people who do this. If you have nothing going on in your life, I guess you just make a job out of watching TV to keep yourself busy.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 21, 2014, 12:50:38 PM
Apparently that scene in got included rape, incest AND fucking next to the corpse of their incest-produced son

now sjws are all nerds who lap up that shit, so let's see if theyll dare attack HBO
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on April 21, 2014, 12:57:55 PM
It's been a few years since I read the (fucking) books, but nothing in the book suggested rape.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on April 21, 2014, 01:10:46 PM
Yesterday's game of thrones had a rapey scene, evacuate the fucking internet.

I could understand the reaction if a rape scene had occurred in say Parks and Rec, but come on this fucking Game of Thrones. The entire show is more or less about awful people doing fucked up shit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 21, 2014, 01:22:52 PM
So it begins. From the AVClub's Rape of Thrones (http://www.avclub.com/article/rape-thrones-203499) article's author's twitter:

Quote
@GLValentine so much rage.
Quote
@GLValentine I have gotten the impression that they don't see the difference between "complicated sex" and rape.
Quote
@ActuallyAisha I hope not much either. The thing is I think that the showrunners like Cersei—just don't get... rape?
Quote
@rgay yes. I literally wrote a 2000 word hate essay about it.
Quote
@uppityminx lol i wrote about it i was SO MAD http://www.avclub.com/article/rape-thrones-203499 …
Quote
@rare_basement Thank you for reading it! That was my reaction when I saw the episode a few weeks ago. RAGE, mostly.
Quote
@pterosaur @rare_basement that's the argument I've heard for it—that the show needed to do something to "humanize" cersei. which.... ?!?!
Quote
@pterosaur @rare_basement right. the implication is that women are only relatable if they're victims.

She hates rape so much, yet can't stop reading about it:
Quote
This made me vomit a little in my mouth. Russian lawmaker orders aide to rape a pregnant female reporter on live TV. http://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamelder/a-russian-lawmaker-just-ordered-his-aide-to-rape-a-journalis …

:adam:

Also apparently on Mad Men it's really cool when women are sluts who sleep with dozens of men:
Quote
It's hot that Peggy has hooked up with the entire LA branch #playa
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on April 21, 2014, 01:29:09 PM
She hates rape so much, yet can't stop reading about it:
Quote
This made me vomit a little in my mouth. Russian lawmaker orders aide to rape a pregnant female reporter on live TV. http://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamelder/a-russian-lawmaker-just-ordered-his-aide-to-rape-a-journalis …

"He was so cool when he was ranting about how much GWB sucks back in 2003, and now this. There are no more heroes."
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 21, 2014, 01:46:53 PM
Goons are so fucking messed up. Most of them are just whitewashing the 'rape' scene as not being rape but the director and editor fucking up that scene, which was clearly consensual in the books. Still you get replies like that:

Quote
I kind of just really hate Jaime now. I don't really understand the point of that scene after all he went through last season - so is he totally into rape now? Just when it's his sister, next to his son's body? Yuck. Totally took me out of the whole episode.
Quote
The rape thing was really jarring. I did not expect it of Jaime. I always kinda liked him before. damn...

so many replies like that.

Reminder: the first time we meet Jaime, he's assfucking his sister then pushes an 8 year old boy to his death from a bell tower.

also:
Quote from: BubbleGoose
Damn, that episode was too short. Fuck Ygritte for killing potato dad. Fuck the Hound for robbing praying dad. Fuck Jaime for being rape dad. Fuck being no-balls surrogate dad.

:drew:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on April 21, 2014, 02:07:08 PM
Truly amazing that goons get upset about daddy issues.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on April 21, 2014, 02:24:52 PM
I'm convinced that goons literally sit in front of the TV with a notepad literally marking down what minorities, sexualities and "genders" they see.

Its incredible to me.

It's the sad SJW version of going to a baseball game with a scorecard. A backwards "R" is a rape looking.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on April 21, 2014, 02:47:29 PM
I'm convinced that goons literally sit in front of the TV with a notepad literally marking down what minorities, sexualities and "genders" they see.

Faggots in places like TVIV that have nothing else in life aren't watching the shows to enjoy them; they're watching them so that they can post about them.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on April 21, 2014, 03:07:54 PM
Rape? In Game of Thrones?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 21, 2014, 03:35:17 PM
All the SJWs complaining about GoT have only made the show that much more popular. Ah, the bittersweet taste of actual irony.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on April 21, 2014, 05:39:33 PM
It's been a few years since I read the (fucking) books, but nothing in the book suggested rape.

The way the scene played out it was more of a "no, not right next to our dead son" but it was obviously taken as "no, don't rape me cis white male." The reaction to it probably partially stems from the character going through a rough couple of seasons and didn't magically become a good guy due to the hardship.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hashtag Activist on April 21, 2014, 09:25:01 PM
Didn't Danerys get raped in the first episode?  Why didn't they stop watching the show after that? She was even supposed to be 13 according to the books.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 21, 2014, 09:37:11 PM
She was raped repeatedly in the first two episodes, until she discovered the power of feminism and reverse cow-girl, and showed her noble but savage of a husband how white women should really be treated



(I'm not kidding btw that's what actually happens)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 21, 2014, 09:42:30 PM
She was raped repeatedly in the first two episodes, until she discovered the power of feminism and reverse cow-girl, and showed her noble but savage of a husband how white women should really be treated

(I'm not kidding btw that's what actually happens)

You forgot the part where she apparently fell in love with him after all that, too.  :goonette:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Bitters on April 21, 2014, 11:41:09 PM
The book barn Song of Ice and Fire thread is usually a pretty chill hangout for people who have read the books and are watching the show while stewing in their loathing for George RR Martin's total lack of a work ethic and creepy fetishes.  Anyway, the Jamie Lannister Rape Party shitstorm has even made its way there, and woe be unto anyone who deviates from loudly proclaiming their revulsion at the show writers for ruining a perfectly good Road To Redemption hackneyed story arc. 

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3422738&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=787

LEFTENANT RIGHTIE eats a probation for daring to discuss the plot, though he does have a penchant for 888 walls o' text. 

Fucking sad.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 21, 2014, 11:59:54 PM
LR made the most sense in that thread, was eloquent and brilliantly explained away the scene: gets a probation because he's not screaming BOOO RAPE! HOW DARE YOU

:tuss:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on April 22, 2014, 12:38:16 AM
The book barn Song of Ice and Fire thread is usually a pretty chill hangout for people who have read the books and are watching the show while stewing in their loathing for George RR Martin's total lack of a work ethic and creepy fetishes.  Anyway, the Jamie Lannister Rape Party shitstorm has even made its way there, and woe be unto anyone who deviates from loudly proclaiming their revulsion at the show writers for ruining a perfectly good Road To Redemption hackneyed story arc. 

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3422738&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=787

LEFTENANT RIGHTIE eats a probation for daring to discuss the plot, though he does have a penchant for 888 walls o' text. 

Fucking sad.

I clicked the link and got hit with another redirect ad on SA, and frankly I find this way more offensive than rape.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on April 22, 2014, 12:39:49 AM
Yeah, LR did a pretty damn good job of defending his position.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on April 22, 2014, 12:53:50 AM
It's kind of funny since the episode also had a scene where a kid's parents were slaughtered right in front of him as the murderers told the kid he would be eating his parents for dinner that night. But apparently the rape is too traumatizing.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on April 22, 2014, 12:55:53 AM
Goons consider rape to be worse than murder in terms of crimes you can commit

I mean rape is wrong, but come the fuck on getting killed is obviously worse
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 22, 2014, 01:01:24 AM
Goons consider rape to be worse than murder in terms of crimes you can commit

I mean rape is wrong, but come the fuck on getting killed is obviously worse

Goons don't even know what rape is—they say its rape when both parties are intoxicated. By that definition I snorted and raped my way through Miami for 3 years
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on April 22, 2014, 08:13:24 AM
Who guessed that Salon would already be out in force on this?

http://www.salon.com/2014/04/21/game_of_thrones_and_the_glamorization_of_rape/
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 22, 2014, 08:20:19 AM
Funny, because I wouldn't have thought rape was anything the author of that piece would ever have to worry about.

(http://galoremag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/roxane-gay.jpg)
(http://cdn.mhpbooks.com/uploads/2013/09/la-et-jc-roxane-gay-strives-to-diversify-the-l-001.jpeg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on April 22, 2014, 10:14:59 AM
Those eyes have never seen a single thing that could possibly be "not problematic."


Except for large amounts of fried chocolate.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on April 22, 2014, 11:00:50 AM
That photo sends my oppression meter spiraling into  TILT TILT TILT  territory
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Petty Hate Machine on April 22, 2014, 01:29:26 PM
Funny, because I wouldn't have thought rape was anything the author of that piece would ever have to worry about.

(http://galoremag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/roxane-gay.jpg)
(http://cdn.mhpbooks.com/uploads/2013/09/la-et-jc-roxane-gay-strives-to-diversify-the-l-001.jpeg)

I'm quite sure it has suffered one form of trauma or another, whether it was going up to the chow line at Golden Corral and not finding any fried chicken or having a wall mounted toilet fall out from under her is anyone's guess.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on April 22, 2014, 02:15:31 PM
Funny, because I wouldn't have thought rape was anything the author of that piece would ever have to worry about.

(http://galoremag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/roxane-gay.jpg)
(http://cdn.mhpbooks.com/uploads/2013/09/la-et-jc-roxane-gay-strives-to-diversify-the-l-001.jpeg)

It's quite an accomplishment to squeeze that much ugly into a single person.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on April 22, 2014, 02:29:42 PM
It's quite an accomplishment to squeeze that much ugly into a single person.

And she's quite ugly on the outside, too!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on April 22, 2014, 03:49:52 PM
Reminder that the show also featured a character having his skin fileted in numerous torture scenes and eventually led to the removal of his genitals. It also featured the King's Guard running around the city taking a sword to infants who may be an heir to the throne. But this is way worse.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on April 22, 2014, 03:54:07 PM
I'm ok with the charred corpses of children because ~*realism*~ but hulk smash if a female character doesn't want to have sex (next to her son's corpse)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on April 22, 2014, 07:10:24 PM
Quote from: Vitamin P" post="428653574
Am I the only one slightly disappointed that the Cellist isn't a dude? Maybe it's because Coulson has always pinged to me but that would have been a nice inclusive semi-twist.

From the Agents of Shield thread.


(http://i.imgur.com/MHTpB82.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on April 22, 2014, 07:10:39 PM
I'm ok with the charred corpses of children because ~*realism*~ but hulk smash if a female character doesn't want to have sex (next to her son's corpse)

with her brother
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Bitters on April 22, 2014, 07:58:03 PM
http://www.avclub.com/article/george-rr-martin-nikolaj-coster-waldau-and-directo-203689

This shit is getting out of hand.  On the GRRM depravity scale, this scene is barely average but it's like these people have never seen the show or read the books (I know most of them haven't and that this is just internet rage du jour). 
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on April 22, 2014, 08:05:03 PM
Quote from: Vitamin P" post="428653574
Am I the only one slightly disappointed that the Cellist isn't a dude? Maybe it's because Coulson has always pinged to me but that would have been a nice inclusive semi-twist.

From the Agents of Shield thread.

You are a retard who didn't pay attention during avengers.
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--MqBQTpcg--/1930yjskloqapgif.gif
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on April 22, 2014, 09:09:08 PM
Agents of S.P.E.R.G.E.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on April 22, 2014, 09:35:36 PM
you know i always thought Rarity was just a fanfiction writing cat lady, this thread has really opened my eyes.  her queen bee of the internet persona makes a lot more sense now.

i do think there are a few fairly normal and sane people who post in TVIV but i'm maybe just being naive.  i don't really read threads for specific shows other than a couple though, and i'm sure i don't want to.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on April 22, 2014, 09:41:27 PM
you know i always thought Rarity was just a fanfiction writing cat lady, this thread has really opened my eyes.  her queen bee of the internet persona makes a lot more sense now.

i do think there are a few fairly normal and sane people who post in TVIV but i'm maybe just being naive.  i don't really read threads for specific shows other than a couple though, and i'm sure i don't want to.

"her"

Rarity is a tranny.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on April 22, 2014, 10:02:09 PM
yes, i know.  him/her/it whatever.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: someasshole on April 22, 2014, 10:13:12 PM
http://www.avclub.com/article/george-rr-martin-nikolaj-coster-waldau-and-directo-203689

This shit is getting out of hand.  On the GRRM depravity scale, this scene is barely average but it's like these people have never seen the show or read the books (I know most of them haven't and that this is just internet rage du jour).

this scene is evil but the lovingly detailed scene of a woman shitting over and over is A-OK i guess
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: FALSE FLAG POSTING EVENT on April 23, 2014, 12:15:08 AM
I watched the episode today and really she's kinda into it in a yes yes no no yes no dont, dont-stop way. Anyways the bitch deserved it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on April 23, 2014, 12:19:51 AM
http://www.avclub.com/article/george-rr-martin-nikolaj-coster-waldau-and-directo-203689

This shit is getting out of hand.  On the GRRM depravity scale, this scene is barely average but it's like these people have never seen the show or read the books (I know most of them haven't and that this is just internet rage du jour).

Don't give these idiots attention. The whole point at throwing a shitfit is to get attention.  :facepalm:

No matter how much you apologize, they'll just keep riding your ass to continue getting attention. This is basic.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 23, 2014, 01:17:21 AM
http://www.avclub.com/article/george-rr-martin-nikolaj-coster-waldau-and-directo-203689

This shit is getting out of hand.  On the GRRM depravity scale, this scene is barely average but it's like these people have never seen the show or read the books (I know most of them haven't and that this is just internet rage du jour).

People still becoming upset over violence/nudity/profanity in TV shows or films in 2014 are completely insufferable. The mainstream days of using TV and music as a scapegoat for irresponsible behavior ended in the 90's/early 00's, get with the fucking times already.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Pornhub Achievement on April 23, 2014, 01:28:23 AM
Funny, because I wouldn't have thought rape was anything the author of that piece would ever have to worry about.

(http://galoremag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/roxane-gay.jpg)
(http://cdn.mhpbooks.com/uploads/2013/09/la-et-jc-roxane-gay-strives-to-diversify-the-l-001.jpeg)

 :lilal:

The fuck is that under its left eye, is that a birthmark or some other discoloration or some stupid ass stripe tattoo.

What an ugly fucking person with ugly fucking opinions.

Its a real shame because often times (Brooklyn Bruiser, this creature, etc) these monstrous looking people are so bitter and lonely that they have nothing better to do than produce an endless stream of 888 garbage that the insular woefully hideous collective all regurgitate endlessly until they coalesce into an ugly ball of rage.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on April 23, 2014, 03:26:22 AM
They're Morgan Freeman niggerfreckles.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on April 23, 2014, 03:48:06 PM
Who guessed that Salon would already be out in force on this?

http://www.salon.com/2014/04/21/game_of_thrones_and_the_glamorization_of_rape/

http://www.roxanegay.com/an-untamed-state/

Trigger Warning: Mary Sue Alert.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Retarded but also Angry on April 23, 2014, 03:59:42 PM
http://www.roxanegay.com/an-untamed-state/

“An Untamed State is a harrowing, suspenseful novel about the connections between sexual violence and political rage, narrated in a voice at once traumatized and eerily controlled. Roxane Gay is a remarkable writer, an astute observer of Haitian society and a deeply sympathetic, unflinching chronicler of the compromises people make in order to survive under the most extreme conditions.”

—Tom Perrota,
author of Little Children and Nine Inches

Aatrek?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ozmas Eggplant on April 23, 2014, 04:04:09 PM
The book barn Song of Ice and Fire thread is usually a pretty chill hangout for people who have read the books and are watching the show while stewing in their loathing for George RR Martin's total lack of a work ethic and creepy fetishes.  Anyway, the Jamie Lannister Rape Party shitstorm has even made its way there, and woe be unto anyone who deviates from loudly proclaiming their revulsion at the show writers for ruining a perfectly good Road To Redemption hackneyed story arc. 

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3422738&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=787

LEFTENANT RIGHTIE eats a probation for daring to discuss the plot, though he does have a penchant for 888 walls o' text. 

Fucking sad.

That thread is pure faggotry. All those faggots got together and wrote a fucking erotic novel based on the books and no matter how much they try to play it off as a joke that is some weird creepy EPW type faggot shit
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Concerned Pyschologist on April 23, 2014, 04:08:18 PM
Who guessed that Salon would already be out in force on this?

http://www.salon.com/2014/04/21/game_of_thrones_and_the_glamorization_of_rape/

There's a quote buried in that article from the director of the episode and he gives his interpretation of the scene, but far be it from fucking goons to understand things like nuance. For all their backpatting and 'analytical' shit like what SMG does, they really miss the point 99% of the time.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on April 23, 2014, 07:19:47 PM
That thread is pure faggotry. All those faggots got together and wrote a fucking erotic novel based on the books and no matter how much they try to play it off as a joke that is some weird creepy EPW type faggot shit

that one thread alone is worse than everything in CD and TVIV combined.  it's really an achievement (or something).
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Monostats Infected Scrotum on April 23, 2014, 08:28:22 PM
That thread is pure faggotry. All those faggots got together and wrote a fucking erotic novel based on the books and no matter how much they try to play it off as a joke that is some weird creepy EPW type faggot shit

that one thread alone is worse than everything in CD and TVIV combined.  it's really an achievement (or something).


I got bored and curious enough, so I hunted down the first book in the GoT series and read the first few chapters, and the  :stare: and  :stonk: value of the (admittedly decent) prose had me wondering how the fuck goons can enjoy this shit.

In the first few chapters you get some serious misogyny, a rape scene (with incestual overtones), slavery, and almost every character is barely likable at best. I've seen hardly any of the TV series, but if it's just as bad or as worse as the books, I'm surprised the entire thread isn't a bunch goons crying about how horrible it is.

I don't have much of an opinion on the books at the moment, other than that they seem to be what would happen if someone took a low fantasy setting then took a steaming shit on any hope, idealism, or decency (albeit written fairly well), but I'm still  :mindblown: how goons can be fans of something that should render them triggered beyond description.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: someasshole on April 23, 2014, 08:37:24 PM
That thread is pure faggotry. All those faggots got together and wrote a fucking erotic novel based on the books and no matter how much they try to play it off as a joke that is some weird creepy EPW type faggot shit

that one thread alone is worse than everything in CD and TVIV combined.  it's really an achievement (or something).


I got bored and curious enough, so I hunted down the first book in the GoT series and read the first few chapters, and the  :stare: and  :stonk: value of the (admittedly decent) prose had me wondering how the fuck goons can enjoy this shit.

In the first few chapters you get some serious misogyny, a rape scene (with incestual overtones), slavery, and almost every character is barely likable at best. I've seen hardly any of the TV series, but if it's just as bad or as worse as the books, I'm surprised the entire thread isn't a bunch goons crying about how horrible it is.

I don't have much of an opinion on the books at the moment, other than that they seem to be what would happen if someone took a low fantasy setting then took a steaming shit on any hope, idealism, or decency (albeit written fairly well), but I'm still  :mindblown: how goons can be fans of something that should render them triggered beyond description.

it's actually really easily explained. there's some stuff in there that makes me uncomfortable because it's really obviously just fetish fuel for the weird old man writing it, but i would imagine most of the people posting about it have only been watching the tv show, which understandably cuts out some of the scat and rape. i don't think a rape scene had happened on camera until recently. you might argue that the book barn would have read the books but that would be a fundamental misunderstanding of people who post in the book barn.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on April 23, 2014, 09:14:24 PM
The books have a bunch of lovingly detailed descriptions of a pregnant woman shitting that I refused to believe were real at first.

I mean yeah fantasy books are terrible but god damn.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on April 23, 2014, 11:16:34 PM
If GRRM had been born twenty years ago he would've been an EPW disciple and never landed a big publishing deal/TV series.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 24, 2014, 12:36:39 AM
The nudity on Game Of Thrones is the only thing that makes that show somewhat watchable.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on April 24, 2014, 03:07:30 PM
Kudos to those Game of Thrones producers for displaying some top notch jewish ingenuity, they put that pseudo rape scene in, get all that extra attention and free publicity from all those faggots pretending to be outraged at it, but they don't risk anything 'cuz there's no way any of those losers would ever give up consuming one of their beloved nerd media products.

Gotta give 'em a  :jewrub: for that
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: POST FRANK on April 27, 2014, 04:37:11 AM
Quote
Frank [27|Apr 04:24 AM]:   op outs self as tranny in tviv
Frank [27|Apr 04:25 AM]:   non-shocker
The Floridian [27|Apr 04:26 AM]:   Who?
Frank [27|Apr 04:26 AM]:   http://forums.somethingawful.com...846487
The Floridian [27|Apr 04:28 AM]:   Oh god...
The Floridian [27|Apr 04:29 AM]:   Put that in the tviv thread lol

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3629050

Quote
Quote
Please note that she said female queer characters, which actually narrows the choices dramatically. No "Looking", for example.

After Ellen posted a list of lesbian/bi characters a few months ago, have a look at it. Perhaps The Fosters might be of interest?

http://www.afterellen.com/the-top-2...ht-now/11/2013/

Who gave you the power to impose a gender on fictional characters, let alone the op?

Quote
I'm trans, mtf, so female gender.

 :tom:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on April 27, 2014, 12:02:37 PM
i don't care if someone wants to cut their dick off or w/e, gay people are fine with me, etc but goddamn TVIV loves to suck the nonexistent cock of Rarity (a sex worker who performed on/for an underaged dude, remember)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Mullah Omar on April 27, 2014, 12:49:44 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/JVcDLAr.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on April 27, 2014, 01:33:20 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/JVcDLAr.jpg)

The Village People have not aged well at all.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on April 27, 2014, 02:28:32 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/JVcDLAr.jpg)

i hope the show contains all the scenes of a 14 year old pregnant girl shitting

"the books are good, i swear!" - people who have never read a good book ever apparently
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on April 27, 2014, 02:31:35 PM
I want to be half as cool as the GURM when I'm his age
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: sub-base turf sniffing boner diarist on April 28, 2014, 12:02:41 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/JVcDLAr.jpg)
:jewrub:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on April 28, 2014, 04:40:46 PM
I want to be half as cool as the GURM when I'm his age

Shouldn't take that long if you're referring to the obesity and overall creepiness
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 28, 2014, 05:29:24 PM
I want to be half as cool as the GURM when I'm his age

Shouldn't take that long if you're referring to the obesity and overall creepiness

Didn't he at one point say he's worried about dropping from a heart attack due to this before he can finish the ASOIAF series?  :allears:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on April 28, 2014, 06:04:37 PM
I want to be half as cool as the GURM when I'm his age

Shouldn't take that long if you're referring to the obesity and overall creepiness

Didn't he at one point say he's worried about dropping from a heart attack due to this before he can finish the ASOIAF series?  :allears:

Supposedly HBO has his completed story outline framework in escrow somewhere in case he dies in his sleep (while dreaming about fucking underage girls)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on April 28, 2014, 11:14:25 PM
I want to be half as cool as the GURM when I'm his age

Shouldn't take that long if you're referring to the obesity and overall creepiness

Didn't he at one point say he's worried about dropping from a heart attack due to this before he can finish the ASOIAF series?  :allears:

Supposedly HBO has his completed story outline framework in escrow somewhere in case he dies in his sleep (while dreaming about fucking underage girls)

He's too old to want to fuck them anymore.

He just wants to watch them shit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on April 29, 2014, 12:22:02 AM
There is no chance he lives long enough to finish the books. TV show will be fine but it's funny for all the people who invested hundreds of hours into his books.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 29, 2014, 04:05:24 AM
Quote from: Those On My Left" post="428914239
Banging on about "the tumblr crowd" is the 2014 version of banging on about political correctness - it's just something that people do when (a) they don't want to think about the politics of a particular piece of art/politics/media/etc, and (b) they want to disguise that disengagement and lack of critical thought as being a really cool and savvy and hip and chill dude (not like those hypersensitive prudes who make you roll your eyes, my god, why can't everyone relax like me).

Here's a thought: Maybe Peter Jackson wasn't so terrified by transethnic otherkin pansexuals that he sat down with his writing team and went "how can we placate these crazy tumblr teenagers". Maybe, instead, he and his team realised "Hey, we're already taking huge liberties with this story, maybe at least ONE of these fifty or sixty characters could be a woman?"

That line of thought isn't exactly wild SJW nonsense, it's just a pretty mild and measured way to think about making a movie in 2014 while not being entirely socially tone deaf. I'm sorry that you think this is such a crazy radical notion that it could only have come out of tumblr, but that really says more about you than it does about anything else.

The funny thing is that there's really very little for feminists (omg FEMINISTS won't they EVER shut up) to like about Tauriel. She's still a female character whose main role is defined pretty much entirely by reference to a male character - they couldn't have her just be a kick arse elf, they had to make her be in love with a dude and maybe desired by another dude (meanwhile, the writers are entirely capable of fleshing out male characters without constructing a love story).

Tauriel, like much of the Hobbit films, is an interesting but ultimately botched concept. But literally the last thing wrong with her is the fact that she's female, which means that the terrorists tumblrites have won.

But...the whole reason "Tauriel" (:rolleyes:) was added into the Hobbit out of thin air was to appease feminists in the first place. There really is no arguing that. Apparently mentioning this really upsets some people!
 
:facepalm:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: marlon perkins on April 29, 2014, 11:30:32 PM
Those eyes have never seen a single thing that could possibly be "not problematic."

Yeah well diabetes does very often cause blindness.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on April 30, 2014, 01:02:31 AM
From the Mad Men thread:
Quote from: Lindsay LoHan solo" post="428879174
I'm amazed by watching the show and reading this thread that anyone respects Don.  Uhh, why in the hell would anyone root for him? Jesus, he's not even doing himself any favors by pursuing his old gig.
:goonette:

The undertone here being that Don is a Problematic White Male and if you like him you are Objectively Wrong.
Quote from: Fetus Tree" post="428879250
Don sucks but being surprised that somebody would root for the main character is just ignorant as shit
:nixon:

Quote from: Lindsay LoHan solo" post="428879311
Uh, he's a piece of shit?  Peggy rules though.
:christina:

For background here, while Don has been trying to do good things and get his life together (even though he can't stop lying and drinking and trying to be cool), Peggy has become a bitter catlady slumlord, snapping at her black secretary and bitching about how the married guy she was fucking rejected her. Or as this guy says:
Quote from: unlawfulsoup" post="428879327
Hahahaha.

Then the excellent Fetus Tree dares to say:
Quote from: Fetus Tree" post="428879597
Lindsay whoever is just figuring out the way the world works guys. No reason to hate him, hes still learning basic things like


Soon he will come to understand that you can think Darth Vader (non-prequels) is a character you can root for and it doesn't make you literally hitler

....:madgoon:..."HIM?" "HIM?" "HOW DARE YOU ATTRIBUTE GENDER TO THIS FINE POSTER?! MODS? MODS!"
Quote from: Lindsay LoHan solo" post="428879734
Well I'm not a him. Also I don't see where Darth Vader or Hitler was introduced in my brief comments on the show, wtf.
Literally shaking.

Quote from: Fetus Tree" post="428879686
ok 'her' or 'xer' or 'xim' or whatever pronoun you prefer, whatever gender you are won't make you any less of a terrible poster

:draper:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on April 30, 2014, 05:26:37 AM
if the pictures are right, Lindsay LoHan solo is a cripple girl in a wheelchair
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on April 30, 2014, 08:09:52 AM
Not an MM fan, but I watched it a bit and read a bit of the TVIV thread back in the bad old days of Minorities in Gaming thread when SA was at full poz.

Never did get the goon adoration of Peggy. She's fucking boring as hell and her plots were stale and predictable. I guess she's considered the attainable nerd girl by the goons.

If she's transitioned to bitter catlady, no wonder they love her.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 30, 2014, 08:18:51 AM
I haven't seen any of that Hobbit shit and I have no intention of watching it but isn't the inclusion of Kate from Lost your basic marketing strategy rather than a sop to feminists? It's a fucking kids/teens movie and if you can get young girls to want to go see it as well as young boys and have them asking for the Kate Happy Meal toy or whatever then you've as good as doubled your box office from it. The most annoying thing about internet SJW activists is literally everything is viewed through the prism of whatever the fuck they spend their whole lives typing about on the internet; not everything is about feminism - sometimes it's just as simple as making more money.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on April 30, 2014, 08:40:02 AM
Not an MM fan, but I watched it a bit and read a bit of the TVIV thread back in the bad old days of Minorities in Gaming thread when SA was at full poz.

Never did get the goon adoration of Peggy. She's fucking boring as hell and her plots were stale and predictable. I guess she's considered the attainable nerd girl by the goons.

If she's transitioned to bitter catlady, no wonder they love her.

The meltdown TVIV had over the Joan/Jaguar (I think) arch was absurd. Basically, the redhead secretary was told by some Jaguar dealership honcho he'd use their business if she slept with him. One of the partners who was in full on slime ball mode (Pete) convinces Joan, who was pretty apprehensive about it, into thinking it's a good idea and then goes to the other partners and says that she's 100% on board with it with no reservations. Goons freak out over how low all the partners are and what inhuman scum they are when it was spelled out that they didn't get even close to the full story.

I didn't look into at the time, but I was pretty sure there were names that popped up that had never been seen in the before, and never seen after as well.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on April 30, 2014, 11:19:11 AM
So there was an article on The Guardian website about GoT:

Quote
http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/apr/29/game-of-thrones-racism-sexism-rape?CMP=fb_gu&commentpage=1

Game of Thrones: too much racism and sexism – so I stopped watching

After yet another rape scene, I no longer trust the creators to bridge the gap of thoughtful conversation between action and intent – so I've given up on Game of Thrones for good


Danielle Henderson   
theguardian.com, Tuesday 29 April 2014 17.26 BST   

Last summer, in the finale of Game of Thrones' third season, mother of dragons Daenerys Targaryen stood outside the walls of Yunkai waiting for the slaves she just freed, hoping to convince them to join her army as free men. Daenerys, the white-blonde queen traded moons ago to the Dothraki by her brother, moves into the crowd of outstretched brown arms as they chant “mhysa”, which, we learn, means “mother” in their native tongue, and is carried into the crowd as the camera pulls back to show her floating in the middle of this sea of arms like the bright planet in a constellation of darkness.

I turned to my husband and said: “No one at HBO remembers the visual impact of slavery, I guess?” It was at that moment I decided to stop watching it.

I’m aware that Game of Thrones is a TV show, a work of fiction, but having invested in it for three seasons, I no longer trusted the creators to bridge the gap of thoughtful conversation between action and intent. How much misogyny and racism are we expected to put up with in the name of entertainment? And what does it mean when those systems of oppression are crafted not solely by the author, but by television executives looking to create a heightened sense of drama?

It’s strange to quit a show after putting so much time into it. I also decided to skip this final season of Mad Men, having long ago lost interest in the weekly display of misogyny and ill will that main character Don Draper visits upon everyone around him. Sure, he’s a man of his time, but that doesn’t mean I have to engage in the weekly assault on my eyeballs as he denigrates his wives and stomps around as a titan of industry, a master of the universe.

I’m exhausted by the triumph of men at the expense of women as a narrative device. It’s not only boring, but also a little too tied to my real-world experience as a woman and person of color for me.......

And I stopped there.

To be fair to the people commenting on the article, these are the top two rated:

(http://i.imgur.com/3o2whVU.png)

So you're probably wondering who Danielle Henderson is and why we should give a fuck about what she's watching on TV. Picture her in your head and we'll see if you're right.

From her profile blurb linked in the above piece:

Quote
Danielle Henderson is a writer who lives in Seattle. She created Feminist Ryan Gosling, and is the arts & culture editor for the Stranger

"Feminist Ryan Gosling" is a site where a load of feminist Ryan Gosling memes were posted. Seriously. It's now a book too.

(http://i.imgur.com/njEMdKr.png)

Some bits from the FRG FAQ page:

Quote
1. Who makes these?

My name is Danielle. I’m a graduate student and teacher in the gender studies program at the University of Wisconsin.

2. Why? I mean…why?

This blog was started as a joke to keep track of the theorists I’m currently studying; I never intended for anyone other than my classmates to see it. I’m not an expert - just a student working through some dense concepts. I need the help, and thought feminist flashcards were a funny idea.

4a. It’s not very feminist of you to use a white male as your avatar. As a black woman who has lived every moment of my black life as a black person in a country that never lets me forget that I’m black (and who has an academic focus on intersectionality, representations of race, and examining the feminist relationship to racism), this is not lost on me. It’s actually quite intentional. That. Is. ALSO. Part. Of. The. Joke.

8. Well, what Spivak was actually saying was that poststructuralist thought…

I’m going to try and say this as nicely as possible: Save it for someone else. I spend 90% of my day immersed in academic thought; this site is both fun and an outlet for me. I’m also sort of making fun of the way academics communicate here; we sound like aliens to some people, and assholes to the rest. I’m glad of your opinions, and love it when people engage in intelligent discussion, but if your singular purpose is to prove me wrong you can save your emailing fingers for another corner of the internet. I have plenty of opportunities to be proven wrong on a daily basis, trust.

And from the bio linked in the first line of the FAQ, that redirects to her own website:

Quote
Danielle went back to college in 2008 after a 12 year hiatus, and graduated summa cum laude in 2011, earning degrees in both English Literature and Women's Studies; in 2013, she earned her Master's degree in Gender and Women's Studies. Her academic work examined critical race theory in communication and media.

et voila:

(http://i.imgur.com/UDO3pNO.jpg)

Honestly, is there a big factory somewhere just churning these fucking clowns out en masse? From a one sentence headline you know what they're going to look like and the pretentious shit they're going to spout. Cookie cutter fucking idiots.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on April 30, 2014, 11:34:10 AM
Quote
As a black woman who has lived every moment of my black life as a black person in a country that never lets me forget that I’m black

Yeah lady, it's definitely all of us that wont shut up about your blackness and how black you are in your black community.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on April 30, 2014, 12:01:19 PM

et voila:

(http://i.imgur.com/UDO3pNO.jpg)

Cookie cutter fucking idiots.

seattle.jpg
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on April 30, 2014, 12:05:57 PM
This is a bullshit article, she stopped watching the show because her husband is addicted to crack and the welfare check each month wasn't enough to cover HBO. Gotta make sacrifices sometimes and dat nigga Tyrion has gots to go.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on April 30, 2014, 12:35:38 PM
The good thing about how fast sjw slacktivism has invaded the mainstream is that in a few years the pendulum is going to swing the other way and no one will give two fucks about what fantasy europe dungeons & dragons has to say about real world issues. Or maybe this is just the 90s PC movement picking up speed because of the internet and in 2020 we'll be legally required to put preferred pronouns on birth certificates.

All is faggot
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on April 30, 2014, 06:13:33 PM
I haven't seen any of that Hobbit shit and I have no intention of watching it but isn't the inclusion of Kate from Lost your basic marketing strategy rather than a sop to feminists? It's a fucking kids/teens movie and if you can get young girls to want to go see it as well as young boys and have them asking for the Kate Happy Meal toy or whatever then you've as good as doubled your box office from it. The most annoying thing about internet SJW activists is literally everything is viewed through the prism of whatever the fuck they spend their whole lives typing about on the internet; not everything is about feminism - sometimes it's just as simple as making more money.

People were complaining about how the first Hobbit movie was nothing but a "sausagefest" and that there were no characters representing the opposite (:rolleyes:) gender. The "love triangle" between her, Legolas, and that Dwarf didn't even fucking exist in the scripts until the reshoots took place due to the announcement of three films rather than two. Even the actress who plays the Elf explicitly told Jackson and the producers when she signed on that she didn't want her character to essentially be Arwen 2.0 with the love arc being her primary role. Google interviews with the actress expressing huge disappointment/resentment when Jackson and crew basically forced her to do it during those reshoots.

Its pretty obvious appeasing the feminism/SJW crowd is the main drive behind this bullshit. Just look at True Detective; arguably the best written thriller/drama TV show in the last decade and what do you know—SJWs constantly bitching about how both detectives were male and what they perceived as misogyny with what the actual female characters were portrayed as (the lead actress actually had to tell these people to shut the fuck up and that they were full of shit). People in 2014 look at EVERYTHING through a political/social justice lens.

All is faggot.

So there was an article on The Guardian website about GoT:

Quote
et voila:

(http://i.imgur.com/UDO3pNO.jpg)

Honestly, is there a big factory somewhere just churning these fucking clowns out en masse? From a one sentence headline you know what they're going to look like and the pretentious shit they're going to spout. Cookie cutter fucking idiots.

:tom: Who would've thought that the most ardently vocal opponent of violence, "rape", and "racism" on TV was an albino looking nigger.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Travis Touchdown 2.0 on April 30, 2014, 06:34:32 PM
Quote
Danielle Henderson is a writer who lives in Seattle. She created Feminist Ryan Gosling, and is the arts & culture editor for the Stranger

"Feminist Ryan Gosling" is a site where a load of feminist Ryan Gosling memes were posted. Seriously. It's now a book too.

(http://i.imgur.com/njEMdKr.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/8Yujuz4.gif)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on April 30, 2014, 06:44:13 PM

:tom: Who would've thought that the most ardently vocal opponent of violence, "rape", and "racism" on TV was an albino looking nigger.

The whole tattoo parlor retro-50's chic really fits too.  You just know she's got to have a Rosie the Riveter print in a cheap Target picture frame hanging on a wall in her stuffy, trendy Queen Anne apartment.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on April 30, 2014, 07:24:23 PM
People were complaining about how the first Hobbit movie was nothing but a "sausagefest" and that there were no characters representing the opposite (:rolleyes:) gender.

It's starting up with the new Star Wars, too. There are people complaining that there's only two women listed in the principal cast that got announced. I've seen the comment brigades firing up whining that it's important to have strong female role models while at the same time bellowing that if a character's "maleness" is important to who they are they're not a well-realized character and that the gender of a role shouldn't matter.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on April 30, 2014, 07:53:55 PM
fuck that noise, Ryan Gosling has done some baller flicks (Drive, Blue Valentine, Only God Forgives).

i hate the media.  i'mma get drunk and listen to negativland
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on April 30, 2014, 08:52:41 PM
People were complaining about how the first Hobbit movie was nothing but a "sausagefest" and that there were no characters representing the opposite (:rolleyes:) gender.

It's starting up with the new Star Wars, too. There are people complaining that there's only two women listed in the principal cast that got announced. I've seen the comment brigades firing up whining that it's important to have strong female role models while at the same time bellowing that if a character's "maleness" is important to who they are they're not a well-realized character and that the gender of a role shouldn't matter.

I hate this fucking planet.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on April 30, 2014, 09:37:29 PM
Quote from: MisterBibs" post="428412977
While I had most of the movie spoiled for me since I didn't make any effort to avoid them, I watched/listened to Let It Go for the first time today. I'm having trouble understanding why the producers said that they changed Elsa's character after writing the song: it's a purestrain Villain Song, and downright terrifying. An awesome song well-sung, but still terrifying.



This is the song he finds "terrifying"   :lilal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on April 30, 2014, 10:18:28 PM
I can't believe you can make a career out of just being outraged by every single thing in the world.

Also funny that the so-called progressive people are the ones demanding that other people's art be changed. And here is another option for the SJWs who can't stand reading or watching something they don't agree with. Write your own fantasy novel without rape and with strong female characters or whatever you're crying about this week. There is literally no overhead involved, just your time.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on April 30, 2014, 10:38:30 PM
Quote from: MisterBibs" post="428412977
While I had most of the movie spoiled for me since I didn't make any effort to avoid them, I watched/listened to Let It Go for the first time today. I'm having trouble understanding why the producers said that they changed Elsa's character after writing the song: it's a purestrain Villain Song, and downright terrifying. An awesome song well-sung, but still terrifying.



This is the song he finds "terrifying"   :lilal:

The white privilege overwhelmed him.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Slacktivist on April 30, 2014, 11:13:18 PM
The fandom that rose around Frozen is mind boggling. All you really need these days is the existence of the possibility of lesbians I guess.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on April 30, 2014, 11:14:20 PM


(http://i.imgur.com/UDO3pNO.jpg)

Honestly, is there a big factory somewhere just churning these fucking clowns out en masse? From a one sentence headline you know what they're going to look like and the pretentious shit they're going to spout. Cookie cutter fucking idiots.

There actually is, its called academia

People were complaining about how the first Hobbit movie was nothing but a "sausagefest" and that there were no characters representing the opposite (:rolleyes:) gender.

It's starting up with the new Star Wars, too. There are people complaining that there's only two women listed in the principal cast that got announced. I've seen the comment brigades firing up whining that it's important to have strong female role models while at the same time bellowing that if a character's "maleness" is important to who they are they're not a well-realized character and that the gender of a role shouldn't matter.

Are the shitlibs trying to get Idris Elba cast as Han Solo yet?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on April 30, 2014, 11:44:45 PM

et voila:

(http://i.imgur.com/UDO3pNO.jpg)

Cookie cutter fucking idiots.

seattle.jpg

This is one of the whitest looking negresses I've ever seen.

People were complaining about how the first Hobbit movie was nothing but a "sausagefest" and that there were no characters representing the opposite (:rolleyes:) gender.

It's starting up with the new Star Wars, too. There are people complaining that there's only two women listed in the principal cast that got announced. I've seen the comment brigades firing up whining that it's important to have strong female role models while at the same time bellowing that if a character's "maleness" is important to who they are they're not a well-realized character and that the gender of a role shouldn't matter.

Thank God I'm growing out of liking sci-fi and other assorted nerdery, which I can't believe I'm actually saying that given I was a chubby nerd for the first quarter of my life.  I look at these people raging over the most trivial, banal, and corporate bullshit (Nerd shit is the epitome of pointless consumerism) and I'm just bewildered. 
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: armchair nazi on May 01, 2014, 12:20:53 AM
People were complaining about how the first Hobbit movie was nothing but a "sausagefest" and that there were no characters representing the opposite (:rolleyes:) gender.

It's starting up with the new Star Wars, too. There are people complaining that there's only two women listed in the principal cast that got announced. I've seen the comment brigades firing up whining that it's important to have strong female role models while at the same time bellowing that if a character's "maleness" is important to who they are they're not a well-realized character and that the gender of a role shouldn't matter.

which is hilarious because star wars never had women. in high school my friend bought a "women of star wars" puzzle as a joke, and it had two women on it. that is all there were, in 6 movies. unless they are gonna slut up mon mothma or some shit
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on May 01, 2014, 02:05:51 AM
Quote from: MisterBibs" post="428412977
While I had most of the movie spoiled for me since I didn't make any effort to avoid them, I watched/listened to Let It Go for the first time today. I'm having trouble understanding why the producers said that they changed Elsa's character after writing the song: it's a purestrain Villain Song, and downright terrifying. An awesome song well-sung, but still terrifying.



This is the song he finds "terrifying"   :lilal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk

I don't think he means in a literally shaking sense; I talked about this in the troon thread where I was laughing about how this has become the troon/dyke/fag anthem.

Basically that chick is an ice wizard, and is singing that song after her ice powers go berserk and plunge the kingdom into permawinter. So the "cold doesn't bother her", and she's forcing it on everyone else with no regard for anyone but herself. It is a villainess song: this is where that chick goes full bitch villainess.

(also the morale of the movie is that she was selfish bitch when did she this and was wrong to do so, which makes troons and fags picking it up as their battle hymn even better)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on May 01, 2014, 02:06:12 AM
Honestly, is there a big factory somewhere just churning these fucking clowns out en masse? From a one sentence headline you know what they're going to look like and the pretentious shit they're going to spout. Cookie cutter fucking idiots.

There actually is, its called academia
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 01, 2014, 03:55:15 AM
People were complaining about how the first Hobbit movie was nothing but a "sausagefest" and that there were no characters representing the opposite (:rolleyes:) gender.

It's starting up with the new Star Wars, too. There are people complaining that there's only two women listed in the principal cast that got announced. I've seen the comment brigades firing up whining that it's important to have strong female role models while at the same time bellowing that if a character's "maleness" is important to who they are they're not a well-realized character and that the gender of a role shouldn't matter.

Are the shitlibs trying to get Idris Elba cast as Han Solo yet?

Apparently the lead protagonist is already black:

(http://i.imgur.com/4PNAPgH.jpg)
John Boyega. (who?)

The dark side of the force found it's new apprentice.

Niggers.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: mart on May 01, 2014, 09:26:34 AM
The fandom that rose around Frozen is mind boggling. All you really need these days is the existence of the possibility of lesbians I guess.

It was an okay movie latched onto by girls, because they love that kind of shit, manchildren who think only Disney produce quality entertainment and shut ins because they think that the movie was trying to say it's okay to be alone.

If we include the attempts at faking being the first then this perfectly sums up goons. It always struck me as a less extreme version of what happened with Harry Potter and the Hunger Games because Frozen was at least decent whereas the first two were bad movies/books that people latched on to because every other fucker latched onto them and people can't stand being against the popular opinion.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on May 01, 2014, 11:03:33 AM
Apparently the lead protagonist is already black:

(http://i.imgur.com/4PNAPgH.jpg)
John Boyega. (who?)

The dark side of the force found it's new apprentice.

Niggers.

Admittedly the bar is low, but if that dude can carry the movie(s) better than Hayden Christiansen, I'm ok with it. I don't care what color he is, I don't even care if he's unknown. Hamill, Fisher and Ford were pretty much nobodies during Star Wars' original casting call and that worked out fine.

If the movie turns out to be crap and filled with poorly-directed, balsa-wood acting like the recent prequels, then I'd be more inclined to think 'affirmative action' was arbitrarily applied during casting.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Travis Touchdown 2.0 on May 01, 2014, 12:54:48 PM
I guess it depends on what he's casted as. Lando was an admitted black hook because even people in the 70's knew Star Wars was the whitest franchise ever, so they got Billy Dee, but the thing with that was they cast him as a sauve motherfucker who runs a black market mining operation, which suited his known-blaxpo style fine, and you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who thought Lando was a shitty addition, diversity shoehorn or not

So then they do the same thing with the prequels by casting Jackson, because during the 90's, it was a no-shit thing about how black people LOVE Jackson, and they could catch lightning in a bottle twice with the next A-list black hook. Problem is, they cast him as a stern and soft-spoken Jedi that just sorta stood around in the first movie, did the same in the second up until a 3-ish minute fight, and again in the third, until he gets his hand chopped-off and thrown out of a window. People see Jackson movies because he yells, curses, drinks, and is an all-around entertaining psychopath, so everything he ain't in the prequels. Boyega is a theatre major with only a handful of major roles, so, uh, third time's the charm
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on May 01, 2014, 01:25:10 PM

It didn't help that Lucas apparently can't directors actors for shit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on May 01, 2014, 01:33:23 PM
Both those replies are completely synched.  I remember all the jokes about Sam Jackson prior to the first movie- 'Which lightsaber belongs to SLJ?  The one labeled "Bad Motherfucker",' etc.  They... *cough* I mean fuckwit Lucas really made a poor decision by not playing to Jackson's strengths.  He would've been a far better "Darth Nyigha" or something.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 01, 2014, 01:38:44 PM
I don't really give a shit about Star Wars but I'll watch Episode VII when it comes around. What I'm afraid of is this generation of pozzed beta faggots burning the internet to the ground if VII doesn't turn out to be a social justice manifesto with laser guns.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on May 01, 2014, 01:39:13 PM
Darth Nyigha
Please add this to the "new members names thread". this is glorious.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Travis Touchdown 2.0 on May 01, 2014, 02:21:35 PM
One every other season is barely enough breathing room for whatever new Marvel IP is due for it's sequel, and a year is narrowly-avoiding a choking death when dealing with a post-OT Star Wars movie

It's just really hard to get excited when Lucas' own modern shit has been upstaged multiple times by the EU, which now conveniently doesn't exist anymore. And even then, he had to get involved with it late-game because of his meltdown over the KotoR games changing his lore for the better, barring ToR, which is liquid nu-Bioware shit

http://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/13/report-lucasarts-canceled-darth-maul-origins-game/

Quote
The biggest vision shift, however, came from George Lucas himself. According to one source, Lucas took statues of Darth Maul and Darth Talon - a character from the Star Wars comics from Dark Horse - faced them toward one another, and declared, "They're friends!" When it was brought to Lucas' attention that Maul and Talon lived more than a century and a half apart from one another, Lucas reportedly suggested it could be a clone or descendant that players controlled instead of the original Maul.

(http://i.imgur.com/bzNrQzP.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on May 01, 2014, 02:36:52 PM
One every other season is barely enough breathing room for whatever new Marvel IP is due for it's sequel, and a year is narrowly-avoiding a choking death when dealing with a post-OT Star Wars movie

It's just really hard to get excited when Lucas' own modern shit has been upstaged multiple times by the EU, which now conveniently doesn't exist anymore. And even then, he had to get involved with it late-game because of his meltdown over the KotoR games changing his lore for the better, barring ToR, which is liquid nu-Bioware shit

http://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/13/report-lucasarts-canceled-darth-maul-origins-game/

Quote
The biggest vision shift, however, came from George Lucas himself. According to one source, Lucas took statues of Darth Maul and Darth Talon - a character from the Star Wars comics from Dark Horse - faced them toward one another, and declared, "They're friends!" When it was brought to Lucas' attention that Maul and Talon lived more than a century and a half apart from one another, Lucas reportedly suggested it could be a clone or descendant that players controlled instead of the original Maul.

(http://i.imgur.com/bzNrQzP.jpg)

 :wgas:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 01, 2014, 02:39:38 PM
http://www.avclub.com/article/bechdel-test-fine-just-way-it-203956

huge 888 about the bechdel test in relation to the episode VII casting announcement. or something. idk. fuck you av club
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on May 01, 2014, 04:15:03 PM
http://www.avclub.com/article/bechdel-test-fine-just-way-it-203956

huge 888 about the bechdel test in relation to the episode VII casting announcement. or something. idk. fuck you av club

I used to read AV Club reviews for some shows I watched or to see if something was worth checking out, but much like alot of other sites populated and ran by sissified beta nerds, they're more concerned with showing how progressive and enlightened they are instead of putting out good, interesting content. All AV Club reviews nowadays are based more on whether something passes muster with their political correctness shitlib checklist of catlady values than if its well made, entertaining, thought provoking, or least important of all, if normal people would actually like it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on May 01, 2014, 04:18:58 PM
I guess it depends on what he's casted as. Lando was an admitted black hook because even people in the 70's knew Star Wars was the whitest franchise ever, so they got Billy Dee, but the thing with that was they cast him as a sauve motherfucker who runs a black market mining operation, which suited his known-blaxpo style fine, and you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who thought Lando was a shitty addition, diversity shoehorn or not

Billy Dee was the diversity hire, but Lando was not a diversity character: He doesn't go ethnic or overtly "act black", or his skin color doesn't even factor in at any point. He is a smooth man playing a smooth character, and you could have had a chink, gook, abo, plains nigger, wop, fog nigger, mick, or even a flaming queer play that character and it would have come off the same.

Also, Empire was not directed by Lucas, so think on that too.

Its like shoehorning Stringer Bell into Thor. The actor is black, but the character isn't. That combined with general competence by the actor in the part means they aren't horrible cringe worthy things that ruin the movie.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 01, 2014, 04:39:47 PM
I don't really give a shit about Star Wars but I'll watch Episode VII when it comes around. What I'm afraid of is this generation of pozzed beta faggots burning the internet to the ground if VII doesn't turn out to be a social justice manifesto with laser guns.

But you already know the producers are going to put political overtones in the film which lean towards that direction. Hollywood can't help themselves with this shit anymore—especially within the last 15 years.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on May 01, 2014, 05:59:08 PM
I loved Captin Americas band of diversity commandos in that first movie.  Holy shit was that over the top.  They literally had a WWII commando team made up of one of every single race. 

Goons have to balance their love of diversity with their autistic need for historical accuracy. 

  "They had the wrong uniforms on!   MY IMMERSION....RUINED!!" vs  "Why aren't there any people of color in this Viking drama about Eric the Red??  RACISM!!!!"

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Travis Touchdown 2.0 on May 01, 2014, 06:10:16 PM
I loved Captin Americas band of diversity commandos in that first movie.  Holy shit was that over the top.  They literally had a WWII commando team made up of one of every single race. 

Goons have to balance their love of diversity with their autistic need for historical accuracy. 

  "They had the wrong uniforms on!   MY IMMERSION....RUINED!!" vs  "Why aren't there any people of color in this Viking drama about Eric the Red??  RACISM!!!!"

It's just like their reaction to Heimdall in Thor now being played by IDRIS ELBAAAAAAA, see, since it's a comic book reality, historical Norse reality doesn't apply, and since Captain America's WW2 also falls into that reality, troops were never segregated!

The best part of D Troop was the black dude who can speak German and French, and the Japanese guy who somehow avoided Manzanar that EXCUSE YOU's Dum Dum to say he's actually American (racist). It kinda sucks how bad Cap falls apart around that time too, I was almost about to think to myself that Marvel movies were gonna be good again after the turd that was Thor
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on May 01, 2014, 07:43:43 PM
I loved Captin Americas band of diversity commandos in that first movie.  Holy shit was that over the top.  They literally had a WWII commando team made up of one of every single race. 

Goons have to balance their love of diversity with their autistic need for historical accuracy. 

  "They had the wrong uniforms on!   MY IMMERSION....RUINED!!" vs  "Why aren't there any people of color in this Viking drama about Eric the Red??  RACISM!!!!"

It's just like their reaction to Heimdall in Thor now being played by IDRIS ELBAAAAAAA, see, since it's a comic book reality, historical Norse reality doesn't apply, and since Captain America's WW2 also falls into that reality, troops were never segregated!

The best part of D Troop was the black dude who can speak German and French, and the Japanese guy who somehow avoided Manzanar that EXCUSE YOU's Dum Dum to say he's actually American (racist). It kinda sucks how bad Cap falls apart around that time too, I was almost about to think to myself that Marvel movies were gonna be good again after the turd that was Thor

The next Marvel movie is going to be a period piece about slavery being a Hydra operation, western whitey have nothing to do with it. It will be about bringing all Americans together.

Christmas 2016.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 01, 2014, 08:00:09 PM
http://www.avclub.com/article/bechdel-test-fine-just-way-it-203956

huge 888 about the bechdel test in relation to the episode VII casting announcement. or something. idk. fuck you av club

I used to read AV Club reviews for some shows I watched or to see if something was worth checking out, but much like alot of other sites populated and ran by sissified beta nerds, they're more concerned with showing how progressive and enlightened they are instead of putting out good, interesting content. All AV Club reviews nowadays are based more on whether something passes muster with their political correctness shitlib checklist of catlady values than if its well made, entertaining, thought provoking, or least important of all, if normal people would actually like it.

And it was pretty fucking sudden, too. Like, in the last two years or something. Even two years ago, TVIV was pretty fast and one of the best places to talk about television if you knew to stay away from certain threads. Same for AV Club, they were pretty decent and talked about a lot of shows that didn't get a lot of exposure otherwise. There were signs of poz, but they were few and really infrequent then it's like a switch turned on and they started nonstop

It's a fucking shame, too
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on May 01, 2014, 08:23:37 PM
http://www.avclub.com/article/bechdel-test-fine-just-way-it-203956

huge 888 about the bechdel test in relation to the episode VII casting announcement. or something. idk. fuck you av club

I used to read AV Club reviews for some shows I watched or to see if something was worth checking out, but much like alot of other sites populated and ran by sissified beta nerds, they're more concerned with showing how progressive and enlightened they are instead of putting out good, interesting content. All AV Club reviews nowadays are based more on whether something passes muster with their political correctness shitlib checklist of catlady values than if its well made, entertaining, thought provoking, or least important of all, if normal people would actually like it.

And it was pretty fucking sudden, too. Like, in the last two years or something. Even two years ago, TVIV was pretty fast and one of the best places to talk about television if you knew to stay away from certain threads. Same for AV Club, they were pretty decent and talked about a lot of shows that didn't get a lot of exposure otherwise. There were signs of poz, but they were few and really infrequent then it's like a switch turned on and they started nonstop

It's a fucking shame, too

There was a mass exodus of staff from the AV Club about a year ago. My guess is those were the writers who could come up with insights besides how problematic it was that there weren't any strong women of color in Das Boot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 01, 2014, 08:28:19 PM
I wasn't aware of it, and now that explains it. I noticed a severe drop in terms of quality when it comes to reviews. They used to be pretty good but somedays they are fucking terrible and really just about racism and privilege in the weirdest shows (like American Horror Story for fuck's sake)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on May 03, 2014, 10:59:57 PM
And it was pretty fucking sudden, too. Like, in the last two years or something. Even two years ago, TVIV was pretty fast and one of the best places to talk about television if you knew to stay away from certain threads

i blame Rarity and his fan club

there are still a few decent posters in the general chat thread and there are a few show threads that aren't terrible (mostly the low-traffic ones)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on May 04, 2014, 12:00:59 AM
I guess it depends on what he's casted as. Lando was an admitted black hook because even people in the 70's knew Star Wars was the whitest franchise ever, so they got Billy Dee, but the thing with that was they cast him as a sauve motherfucker who runs a black market mining operation, which suited his known-blaxpo style fine, and you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who thought Lando was a shitty addition, diversity shoehorn or not

So then they do the same thing with the prequels by casting Jackson, because during the 90's, it was a no-shit thing about how black people LOVE Jackson, and they could catch lightning in a bottle twice with the next A-list black hook. Problem is, they cast him as a stern and soft-spoken Jedi that just sorta stood around in the first movie, did the same in the second up until a 3-ish minute fight, and again in the third, until he gets his hand chopped-off and thrown out of a window. People see Jackson movies because he yells, curses, drinks, and is an all-around entertaining psychopath, so everything he ain't in the prequels. Boyega is a theatre major with only a handful of major roles, so, uh, third time's the charm

and despite all his professions to the contrary, Mace Windu did indeed, go out like a punk.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on May 04, 2014, 01:05:17 AM
AVClub had a lot of good writers and they went on to other sites. Now it's filled with 20-somethings who don't have anything insightful to say about shows so they just complain about social issues. It's good clickbait and you don't have to actually be talented to write it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on May 04, 2014, 07:14:06 AM
Another from the Mad Men thread:

For background, in the last episode Don's ex-wife Betty is a cunt to one of their kids, basically yelling at him for doing a stupid kid mistake.
Quote from: olin" post="428984670
The way Betty treated that boy in this last episode was one of the most soul crushing things I've ever seen in any film or TV show. I'm seriously fucked up now from watching that.
:diabetes:


Quote from: Pron on VHS" post="429003247
Haha really?
:heyo:


Quote from: meat sweats" post="429015615
Believe it or not, there is a population of TV viewers for whom realistic depictions of human flaws and emotion can have a greater impact than dudes getting raped by dragons or whatever!
:christina:
 
:nah:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nig Disliker on May 04, 2014, 10:00:42 AM
AVClub had a lot of good writers and they went on to other sites. Now it's filled with 20-somethings who don't have anything insightful to say about shows so they just complain about social issues. It's good clickbait and you don't have to actually be talented to write it.

It seems like SJWs always follow after the better writers leave.  I'm guessing it's because they know how to write good clickbait and are willing to work for little or nothing.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on May 04, 2014, 10:32:20 AM
AVClub had a lot of good writers and they went on to other sites. Now it's filled with 20-somethings who don't have anything insightful to say about shows so they just complain about social issues. It's good clickbait and you don't have to actually be talented to write it.

It seems like SJWs always follow after the better writers leave.  I'm guessing it's because they know how to write good clickbait and are willing to work for little or nothing.

Why pay some professional writer five to six figures a year to write articles about whether or not Captain America: Winter Soldier passes the Bechdel test, when you can just crowd source and have some women's studies major write the same article for fifty bucks a pop.

No matter how much The AV Club and sites like it crow about social justice, they're still about the bottom line in the end of the day.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 04, 2014, 11:54:49 AM
And it was pretty fucking sudden, too. Like, in the last two years or something. Even two years ago, TVIV was pretty fast and one of the best places to talk about television if you knew to stay away from certain threads

i blame Rarity and his fan club

there are still a few decent posters in the general chat thread and there are a few show threads that aren't terrible (mostly the low-traffic ones)

I think a fair share of the blame deserves to be placed on the irc channel, that's the thing that lead to the fact that there's a real fucking circlejerk and a bunch of people who treat it like it's their fiefdom and will fucking roll over anyone they don't like and grasp at any reason. I mean remember that, as I showed not too long ago, these guys frequently use it as a base to crush wrongthink and expel bad posters from their forum.

I guess it's not surprising that guys who talk about mostly anime and tv shows for children and young adult treat that subforum like it's fucking battle royale
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on May 04, 2014, 12:36:19 PM
What did TVIV in was the Avatar the Last Airbender thread which I think was the home of patient zero for forums sjw shit. In the thread they posted someone's watch-along blog by this absurd manic depressed guy who got triggered by the word "crazy," and made references to his horrible child abuse in every episode. It sort of bled out from there because goons kept sympathizing.

For reference: http://markwatches.net/reviews/about/

Quote
RULES FOR COMMENTING

1) Don’t spam. The end. You’ll be instantly banned.

2) No egregious name-calling or bullying. If you feel like an argument is getting out of hand, report it by clicking the “Report” button on the bottom right below the comment. Please do not escalate any argument to personal, ad hominem attacks.

3) No use of any pejorative slurs allowed in any context EXCEPT when you are quoting something or explaining about its usage in culture. You are allowed to use them to talk ABOUT them, but are not allowed to USE them to talk. Deal? Deal.

Quite a few people have still managed to use slurs on this site, despite that I have even addressed said slurs in my reviews! So, can we all PLEASE strip “crazy” and “lame” from our vocabularies on this site immediately? And if you are called on it, please stop and MOVE ON. No defending your use of those words.

Edit from December 11, 2011: It seems people still do not understand this rule and are set on fighting me, calling me “politically correct,” which is a horrific term that’s virtually lost all meaning forever because no one uses it right, a “tyrant,” someone who “gets off on controlling others,” and many other wonderful terms.

If this rule makes no sense to you, I highly suggest you read this comment of mine from a Battlestar Galactica review that explains why I have this rule about pejorative slurs. I am not judging you, I’m not censoring you, I’m not stunting your growth: I am trying to make this community open for everyone who posts in it.

4) No bigotry, racist, sexist, cissexist, transmisogynistic, ableist bullshit will be allowed. I can’t list every form of oppression that exists, but think about your words: are they at the expense of a minority group or a vulnerable community of people? Are you being mean for the sake of it or to make an ill-formed joke? Have some courtesy to those around you; you have no idea who else is reading the comments and can be potentially harmed or triggered by your words.

(On this same note: If I’ve said something shitty, feel free to publicly or privately call me out. I am not exempt in any way.)

If someone calls you out: Take a moment to breathe and think about why someone would say that to you before reacting. Most of the time, you’ve used oppressive language or said something that, regardless of intent, is pretty shitty. Do NOT turn it into a personal attack about how people are too “sensitive” or “politically correct.” YOU WILL BE BANNED.

Given what happened in a recent Doctor Who review, I’d like to expand both numbers 3 and 4 to make sure that this does not happen again. I’m going to send each of you to Derailing For Dummies and suggest you read it. Yes, that very name is tragically ironic, given that “dumb” and “dummy” is recognized as an ableist slur, but it is still a wonderfully complete site to explain exactly why some of the things privileged people say are inherently (or blatantly) fucked up.

I wanted to create a list like I did below for spoilers, but I felt that there was no way I could do it as comprehensively as that site. If you are called out, please do not engage in any of the privilege-denying garbage located at that link. Sometimes I’ll warn you. Your comment will probably get deleted by the moderation team. And some days, I’ll just get tired and you’ll be banned. Whatever happens, please know that this shit WILL NOT BE TOLERATED on Mark Watches.

Edit: January 2012: Okay, a lot of you still want to fight me on this. If you are at all confused about the use of a lot of -isms and whatnot, I am going to direct you to this wonderful resource that might explain a lot of what I talk about or is brought up in the comments:

Social Justice 101!

I do not expect everyone ever to read that whole page before you comment, but I wanted to provide a more comprehensive resource for anti-oppression terminology and history. I would advise everyone spend some time on this page, and to specifically look at the section that might pertain to you. I am not trying to be annoying or irritating by asking people not to use slurs, to not derail conversations, or to not ignore any power dynamics in a conversation. I am trying to create a community where everyone can feel comfortable and welcome with discussing and engaging fiction in an entertaining way.

5) I am not the government. The First Amendment doesn’t apply here. This is my site and you post by my rules. If you invoke any free speech bullshit and claim that I’m infringing your right to say what you want on my blog, that is an instant, permanent ban. Not only are you wrong, but I won’t waste my time dealing with you.

I’ve said it before and it stands bearing repeating now: If I have to make the majority feel uncomfortable to make the minority feel welcome, I will.

Because I am going to be watching shows that I have had no experience with (as well as other members of the community, we have an ongoing and VERY STRICT spoiler policy in place. Please read this before you post a comment. (FYI, this is the same one that was on MRHP, but I just removed all the HP spoilers.)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on May 04, 2014, 01:21:50 PM
TVIV has always been pretty bad. Sure there's been a ramp up of SJW, but before that it was some morons arguing some unbelievably trivial detail and if you didn't like [character] you were a racist/misogynist/whatever.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on May 04, 2014, 01:22:48 PM
AVClub had a lot of good writers and they went on to other sites. Now it's filled with 20-somethings who don't have anything insightful to say about shows so they just complain about social issues. It's good clickbait and you don't have to actually be talented to write it.

It seems like SJWs always follow after the better writers leave.  I'm guessing it's because they know how to write good clickbait and are willing to work for little or nothing.

Why pay some professional writer five to six figures a year to write articles about whether or not Captain America: Winter Soldier passes the Bechdel test, when you can just crowd source and have some women's studies major write the same article for fifty bucks a pop.

No matter how much The AV Club and sites like it crow about social justice, they're still about the bottom line in the end of the day.

It's astounding how despite their rhetoric most leftist ran media organizations pay their employees absolute shit. 
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on May 04, 2014, 01:23:36 PM
AVClub had a lot of good writers and they went on to other sites. Now it's filled with 20-somethings who don't have anything insightful to say about shows so they just complain about social issues. It's good clickbait and you don't have to actually be talented to write it.

It seems like SJWs always follow after the better writers leave.  I'm guessing it's because they know how to write good clickbait and are willing to work for little or nothing.

Why pay some professional writer five to six figures a year to write articles about whether or not Captain America: Winter Soldier passes the Bechdel test, when you can just crowd source and have some women's studies major write the same article for fifty bucks a pop.

No matter how much The AV Club and sites like it crow about social justice, they're still about the bottom line in the end of the day.

It's astounding how despite their rhetoric most leftist ran media organizations pay their employees absolute shit.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/28/media-matters-employees-union_n_5229343.html
Quote
Media Matters Employees Feel 'Betrayed' By Management's Opposition To Their Union
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rockchalk on May 04, 2014, 01:51:26 PM
TVIV has always been pretty bad. Sure there's been a ramp up of SJW, but before that it was some morons arguing some unbelievably trivial detail and if you didn't like [character] you were a racist/misogynist/whatever.

Though to be honest they require that you like all characters. Even the evil hetwhitecismales like Walter White and Tony Soprano who it would not be Very Problematic to dislike have to be someone you "root for" because the forum is full of manchildren who can't understand TV at any level beyond cheering for the protagonist's team to "win."
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on May 04, 2014, 08:01:42 PM
The best is to just go into the thread about whatever the SJW approved movie of the week is and say you didn't like it.  Then sit back and watch how fucking angry they get.  Frozen, 12 years a slave, the butler, any of those work great.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 05, 2014, 02:11:01 AM
I still can't believe there was a 10 page discussion about "gender politics" (:rolleyes:) in the Godzilla thread—started by that faggot K. Waste. Yes, thats right, goons were happy to have a discussion about gender identity in a thread about a giant monster half a mile tall destroying cities. All is faggot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rockchalk on May 05, 2014, 03:10:31 AM
The best is to just go into the thread about whatever the SJW approved movie of the week is and say you didn't like it.  Then sit back and watch how fucking angry they get.  Frozen, 12 years a slave, the butler, any of those work great.

Come on, even SA isn't stupid enough to have actually liked The Butler, right? Let's see some quotes.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nig Disliker on May 05, 2014, 07:54:16 AM
I wouldn't be shocked if goons disliked movies like The Butler or 12 Years a Slave but pretended they did anyway for social justice cred.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on May 05, 2014, 08:23:51 AM
I wouldn't be shocked if goons disliked never watched movies like The Butler or 12 Years a Slave but pretended they did anyway for social justice cred.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 05, 2014, 10:59:05 AM
It's been a long time since I've 888ed about anything here, so I'm going to do it about a dumb gay tv show

(tw: rape scene on a television show, denial of patriarchy smashing)

So my fiancee and I caught up with Orphan Black over the winter after hearing and reading all the buzz the show had been getting by the rest of the world (and goons as well). I mostly stayed away from it because it's made by BBC America and goons can be so fucking insufferable about that shit, as if having the UK involved makes it more likely for a series to be better or not pull so many punches.

Now the show itself turned out to be fairly good despite my initial apprehensions, but the real attraction is the lead and the fantastic job she does playing multiple characters. Most people recognize that and move on, but sadly between the fact that the show is centered on women, and one of the other main character is the kind of flamboyant gay friend every girl dreams of having as a best friend, the tumblr generation and sjws have mistaken the show as some sort of feminist and female empowerment thing. They see the show as women literally smashing the patriarchy and reclaiming their agency. Not only is that not what the show is about, but it's filled with other things they would otherwise find problematic in other shows. There's a list of things in that show that should make them ultlibrage but they gloss over it because it's a damn good show with an incredible actress and decided to give it a pass.

The biggest rage factor has to do with the premise be that the clones are all obviously made of the very same DNA, yet because of nature they are all very different in terms of personalities and occupations. One of them, the (:rolleyes:) hippie artsy pot-smoking far-left lesbian scientist is the only gay woman of the bunch. Same exact genetic material of all those fucking clones (we have no idea if it's just a handful or many more), and yet only one of them turned out to be a lesbian. I mean this is a giant 'nurture, not nature' and that would make gays and their allies (who will do most of the screaming like in the case of the Duck Dynasty thing recently) absolutely rage but there's also a character who's really flamboyant and funny so they just kind of forget about that and call it lgbt-friendly because two members of the main cast are gay (nevermind that the flamboyant one is also a drug addict and all-around crook and might fuck for money).

Scientists (aside from the clone one) are the big villains of the show as well, something that should make goons rage but since you've had a religious cult in the background where it's mostly patriarchal white cismales who dress like they are either from Texas or their community theater's Reservoir Dogs dress rehearsal, even though they live in fucking Ontario so they just gloss over that as well.

They also don't seem to understand that just because the lead actress is an incredible performer (and seriously, she's by far the best actress in television right now, she's running circles around absolutely every body) and the clones she impersonates are all really distinctive and interesting, that they are somewhat good role models of fighting the patriarchy or whatever. The thing is, they are not. They are all absolutely terrible people, aside from the dike scientist (though I'm sure they'll reveal she trained as a child by conducting experiment on neighborhood pets or something).

Just this last episode, the main clone used her child as a shoplifting decoy (a child of 6 or she used many times in the past to help thieve people and knows full well what she's doing), then she broke in the place of her baby daddy at night thinking he wasn't there. That's the baby daddy who doesn't know that he's a baby daddy, and last time he saw her she stole 10 large of his savings). That's just in the span of 20 minutes. All characters are all fucked up and do really terrible things but they are also really fun to watch which makes goons confuse and start pretending they are good human beings.

Of course, all the terrible things the clones do constantly and wreck those around them are never mentioned, because you have the enemies who are all men (except all of those women who participate in it but are obviously secretly subjugated by the patriarchy to do their bidding) and in last night's episode, the leader of one of the bad men factions did this:

Quote from: AVClub
Then, Henrik scoops Helena up and carries her over the threshold, her limp legs hanging over his arms.  No amount of platitudes or white smocks can mask the fact that we’re watching the prelude to a rape.

Helena’s story is devastating, especially because if it feels so realistic. Women have always, always been reduced to their reproductive value, or more simply, to their bodies. Yes, leaps and bounds have been made in past years, but the default consideration of a woman’s worth is to consider her body. Is it good? Can it be useful, or at least controlled? If so, congratulations, woman—you’re worth something! For these reasons, there’s no doubt in my mind that if human cloning were to become a reality, it would start with a woman. So while Sarah, Alison, and Cosima’s stories are more immediately appealing, it’s Helena’s story that makes Orphan Black a fascinating series. It could have easily ramped up the villains, upped the quotient of high stakes chases, and introduced a love hexagon to become a perfectly fun slice of escapism for a Saturday afternoon. Instead, Orphan Black is tackling the already fraught issue of female agency and posing a chilling question: what would happen if we could create and own women? I love a car chase as much as anyone, but a show that takes on something as huge as gendered violence without hesitation is infinitely more interesting.

This is beautiful because not only is this a completely enraging piece of trash writing masquerading as a review,  but we've reached 'A rape scene on television' clashing with a show that SJWs are enamored with and see as feminist. The fact that a rape scene was featured and had a pretty exploitative lead-up is completely brushed under the table even in a way GoT couldn't.

I love how suddenly a rape scene on a television show is alright because reasons. Living with cognitive dysfunction like that must be terrible
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: brolonium on May 05, 2014, 11:24:58 AM
It's been a long time since I've 888ed about anything here,


No it hasn't
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on May 05, 2014, 01:26:54 PM
All characters are all fucked up and do really terrible things but they are also really fun to watch which makes goons confuse and start pretending they are good human beings.

 :reagan:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 05, 2014, 01:51:59 PM
Tatiana Maslany is the best.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Renegade Jew on May 05, 2014, 04:06:47 PM
we've reached 'A rape scene on television' clashing with a show that SJWs are enamored with and see as feminist. The fact that a rape scene was featured and had a pretty exploitative lead-up is completely brushed under the table even in a way GoT couldn't.

I love how suddenly a rape scene on a television show is alright because reasons. Living with cognitive dysfunction like that must be terrible

 :christina: :goonette: Rape is only bad when the patriarchy does it. When a woman does it, she's smashing the patriarchy so it's ok. :goonette: :christina:

Replace rape with anything really, it's funny what kind of dumb arguments you can laugh at here.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on May 05, 2014, 09:01:45 PM
TVIV is the worst and most hypocritical platform for social justice avenging.  Most of these pathetic pseudo-intellects probably aren't even *aware* that their fascinations with media programming are ridiculously shallow and are predominantly led by hormonally-encouraged attractions to genetic-lottery-winner pretty people that are also talented at pretending to be anyone but themselves.

Oh but refer to Angelina Jolie by her tits? or make an unseemingly comment about the bonerific manner in which Scarlett Johannsen's ass packs into Black Widow's skinsuit, and enjoy your frothing-rage driven probation.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on May 05, 2014, 10:06:10 PM
I "get" the discouragement for that kind of ongoing discussion. Too much of it and it just ends up being a 14 year old fest. But oppressing physical
Shallow chat completely just turns it into 8 year old, "eww, you said BOOB" fest.

Turns out 'real' adults would be able to discuss the physicality of actors and actresses in a way that wasnt stiflingly '13 year old boy retarded' or '9 year old boy who thinks kissing girls is gross' childish.
The sad part is presumably adult individuals need loser mods to make sure grown people dont talk About penises and vaginas.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on May 05, 2014, 11:38:50 PM
I wasn't aware of it, and now that explains it. I noticed a severe drop in terms of quality when it comes to reviews. They used to be pretty good but somedays they are fucking terrible and really just about racism and privilege in the weirdest shows (like American Horror Story for fuck's sake)

Yeah, AV Club just keeps getting progressively worse and worse, not only with the SJW garbage, but with hack writers that I'd swear were on the spectrum. One of the last reviews I read on there a month or so ago, the writer of the review had to be explained to in the comments how and what happened in the episode. His review was that bad that it was obvious that he couldn't even follow the plot of a cable show(well the parts of the review where he wasn't going all  :ultlibrage: about a rape scene).
Thats when i just said fuck it, might as well just read tviv from now on if I'm gonna be reading sjw shit and autists misunderstanding tv.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 06, 2014, 12:46:33 AM
TVIV is the worst and most hypocritical platform for social justice avenging.  Most of these pathetic pseudo-intellects probably aren't even *aware* that their fascinations with media programming are ridiculously shallow and are predominantly led by hormonally-encouraged attractions to genetic-lottery-winner pretty people that are also talented at pretending to be anyone but themselves.

Oh but refer to Angelina Jolie by her tits? or make an unseemingly comment about the bonerific manner in which Scarlett Johannsen's ass packs into Black Widow's skinsuit, and enjoy your frothing-rage driven probation.

This isn't just restricted to TVIV & CineD, it applies to SA as a whole. Even calling a woman a female or hot is enough to trigger the  :ultlibrage: in the majority of goons. Meanwhile they vehemently defend Islamic treatment of woman.  :tuss:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on May 06, 2014, 01:20:45 PM
Yeah, AV Club just keeps getting progressively worse and worse

lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Renegade Jew on May 06, 2014, 06:26:19 PM
TVIV is the worst and most hypocritical platform for social justice avenging.  Most of these pathetic pseudo-intellects probably aren't even *aware* that their fascinations with media programming are ridiculously shallow and are predominantly led by hormonally-encouraged attractions to genetic-lottery-winner pretty people that are also talented at pretending to be anyone but themselves.

Oh but refer to Angelina Jolie by her tits? or make an unseemingly comment about the bonerific manner in which Scarlett Johannsen's ass packs into Black Widow's skinsuit, and enjoy your frothing-rage driven probation.

I think we can all agree that Vargo is a horrible mod
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 10, 2014, 02:32:40 AM
Newest gem in the Transformers thread:

Quote from: Milky Moor" post="429447873
I still find it weird that there's no female robots present anywhere in the series except for about a total of five minutes in the second film, especially after Hasbro was surprised by the fans designing that new one (Windshield?)

Thread is full of discussion about supposedly racist robots (:rolleyes: lmao), but apparently thats not enough. So what is more pathetic, looking for gender issues in robots or giant monsters pushing buildings over (Godzilla)? Because goons are all over it!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on May 10, 2014, 07:17:28 PM
Quote from: Milky Moor" post="429447873
I still find it weird that there's no female robots present anywhere in the series except for about a total of five minutes in the second film, especially after Hasbro was surprised by the fans designing that new one (Windshield?)

Hey guess what faggot there's no male robots present anywhere either.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on May 10, 2014, 07:23:43 PM
I only just noticed that back in the day, they gave Arcee a chestplate that kinda look like tits.

(http://i.imgur.com/G2nxInP.jpg)

I remember she was pink because that's a girl's colour, right, goons?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Concerned Pyschologist on May 10, 2014, 08:07:27 PM
Moron goon Occupation reviews a Tim Allen sitcom, goes into an apoplectic fit over the show's 'racism' while seemingly hitting every single D&D goon's hot buttons.

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3632901

Review offers up little analysis/explanation, beyond some vague references and one line that could maybe, possibly be construed as racist. Not that a Tim Allen sitcom should be subjected to in depth analysis or review, but come the fuck on.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 10, 2014, 09:57:38 PM
Occupation is one of the absolute worst tviv posters. He's so fucking strident and he's in SJW overdrive. There are few posters on SA that irritate the shit out of me, and he's way up there
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 10, 2014, 10:33:39 PM
Rarity is still the worst TVIV poster.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 11, 2014, 07:33:20 PM
Quote from: Hbomberguy" post="429500946
What's 'hidden' about the scene where the ad-magazine-pretty Alice character is revealed to be part of a strategy to manipulate you through your desires, and her face falls open to reveal a harsh, metallic, monstrous face beneath it?

(http://i.imgur.com/vHDcAdu.jpg)

This image is pretty much symbolic of the film's whole ethos regarding capitalism and human behaviour. Note that it's framed and arranged to be like an ad for Maybelline or whatever. The people on the marketing might be attractive - but beneath it is the singular desire to get your money through whatever means deemed necessary. The Hollywood system itself runs on money, and not the feelings they claim to want to give you with their movies. 'Hidden satire'? It might not be - at the very least it's the most direct about the truth, even accidentally.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Concerned Pyschologist on May 11, 2014, 07:43:38 PM
Every fucking ad you see is 'running on money', although they may make appeals to emotion/feelings.
 
Fake edit: It's not even an advert, it's fucking concept art, which isn't necessarily intended for outside consumption.

Fucking goons.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on May 11, 2014, 10:03:23 PM
Fuck Hhbomberguy and his sidekick supermechagodzilla. According to those two every goddamn movie is a critique of capitalism. They literally can't see a movie in any other light.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on May 12, 2014, 12:53:55 AM
Some people are so powerless that they see enemies everywhere in life.  It's just another way to lash out and seem smart at the same time.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on May 12, 2014, 02:27:07 AM
Occupation is one of the absolute worst tviv posters. He's so fucking strident and he's in SJW overdrive. There are few posters on SA that irritate the shit out of me, and he's way up there

Occupation is like legit mentally ill, has been/is semi-homeless and every single person in tviv hates him.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on May 15, 2014, 03:54:49 AM
h/t to Koos for this.

This is a post in the Superman movie thread.

Quote from: SuperMechagodzilla
It's not a competition. The fretting over 'what will happen to me?' is, simply, not leftist. You should already know what would happen to you. These things have been thought over for decades now. The proper response to looming ecological crises, as per Badiou and Zizek:

- strict egalitarian justice (all people should pay the same price in eventual renunciations, i.e., one should impose the same world-wide norms of per capita energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, etc.; the developed nations should not be allowed to poison the environment at the present rate, blaming the developing Third World countries, from Brazil to China, for ruining our shared environment with their rapid development);

- terror (ruthless punishment of all who violate the imposed protective measures, inclusive of severe limitations of liberal "freedoms," technological control of the prospective law-breakers);

- voluntarism (the only way to confront the threat of the ecological catastrophe is by means of large-scale collective decisions which will run counter the "spontaneous" immanent logic of capitalist development - it is not the question of helping the historical tendency or necessity to realize itself, but to "stop the train" of history which runs towards the precipice of global catastrophe;

- and, last but not least, all this combined with the trust in the people (the wager that the large majority of the people support these severe measures, see them as their own, and are ready to participate in their enforcement). One should not be afraid to assert, as a combination of terror and trust in the people, the reactivation of one of the figures of all egalitarian-revolutionary terror, the "informer" who denounces the culprits to the authorities. (Already in the case of the Enron scandal, the Time magazine was right to celebrate the insiders who tipped-off the financial authorities as true public heroes.)

The last part, the trust in the people, is specifically what is missing in the worry over 'what will happen to me?' If we apply these same four principles to the question of taxation - imposing extremely severe taxes on the richest until the most destitute can live acceptably - my wager is that the vast majority of people will be down with this. Like, why not? Those who hinder the basic proposal to feed and house the poor would not be difficult to identify, and I honestly don't see any trouble with their being killed if necessary.

That's not to say killing is necessary. The point is to be willing to stop at nothing.

And, obviously, this brutal imposition of egalitarian justice applies to the revolutionaries themselves. If their power is abused, it is by definition not egalitarian - and, like Bane, they deserve what they get.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: As a white male I on May 15, 2014, 11:04:08 AM
Every time I see a supermechagodzilla post, my eyes just instinctively begin to wander. Kind of like reading a boring-ass university math book, I subconsciously look for something, anything more interesting than what I'm reading at the moment.

What a terrible writer supermechagodzilla is.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on May 15, 2014, 12:03:17 PM
Some people are so powerless that they see enemies everywhere in life.  It's just another way to lash out and seem smart at the same time.

'Seeing enemies everywhere' allows losers from mild spectrum to full blown schizophrenic disorder to be completely blameless for the problems they cause for their own lives, and it probably affords them the illusion that they're important to SOMEBODY to have such a dedicated cabal of secret bad guys holding them down.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on May 15, 2014, 03:11:18 PM
Every time I see a supermechagodzilla post, my eyes just instinctively begin to wander. Kind of like reading a boring-ass university math book, I subconsciously look for something, anything more interesting than what I'm reading at the moment.

What a terrible writer supermechagodzilla is.

*quotes Zizek*
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on May 15, 2014, 03:52:56 PM
Every time I see a supermechagodzilla post, my eyes just instinctively begin to wander. Kind of like reading a boring-ass university math book, I subconsciously look for something, anything more interesting than what I'm reading at the moment.

What a terrible writer supermechagodzilla is.

*quotes Zizek*

There are people in the world who have managed to become successful and influential despite their extreme gooniness - think Richard Stallman - but Zizek is perhaps the only person I can think of who managed to turn gooniness itself into a successful career. No wonder SA worships him.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on May 15, 2014, 04:48:23 PM
i would barely call him successful everyone slightly outside his social circle thinks hes a retard or has no clue he exists. hes like a tumblr/internet thing who shows up at random protests.

edit: I guess if by successful you mean makes enough money to eat that true but successful as in making a solid contribution to whatever the fuck you'd call his field, Philosophy I guess, hes not.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: a bad guy on May 15, 2014, 05:03:45 PM
i would barely call him successful everyone slightly outside his social circle thinks hes a retard or has no clue he exists. hes like a tumblr/internet thing who shows up at random protests.

edit: I guess if by successful you mean makes enough money to eat that true but successful as in making a solid contribution to whatever the fuck you'd call his field, Philosophy I guess, hes not.

Everyone in the field of Philosophy thinks Zizek is a colossal faggot. 
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 15, 2014, 05:14:14 PM
Occupation is one of the absolute worst tviv posters. He's so fucking strident and he's in SJW overdrive. There are few posters on SA that irritate the shit out of me, and he's way up there

Occupation is like mentally ill, has been/is semi-homeless and every single person in tviv hates him.

That would make sense, although I don't think every single person in tviv hates him, just everyone who is not in the in-crowd (and about half of those in that crowd but don't say it out loud)

he's also claimed to be an iraq vet but based on shit over the years + comments he made on IRC I really doubt its accurate
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 15, 2014, 05:48:46 PM
Everyone in the field of Philosophy thinks Zizek is a colossal faggot.

I forgot who this guy was and the first sentence on his wikipedia says he's a "marxist philosopher".  :rolleyes: Go figure.

Come to think of it, anyone who refers to themselves as a philosopher is most likely a tremendous faggot reeking of unbridled arrogance.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on May 15, 2014, 07:13:36 PM
i would barely call him successful everyone slightly outside his social circle thinks hes a retard or has no clue he exists. hes like a tumblr/internet thing who shows up at random protests.

edit: I guess if by successful you mean makes enough money to eat that true but successful as in making a solid contribution to whatever the fuck you'd call his field, Philosophy I guess, hes not.

Everyone in the field of Philosophy thinks Zizek is a colossal faggot.

Oh I'm sure they do. But he still has way more adoring fans and makes way more money than 99% of those philosophers who rightfully despise him. (Not that it's a high bar to clear.)

Same thing with Bernard-Henri Levy really, except he's a spoiled playboy douche instead of a goony faggot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: jabba on May 15, 2014, 07:33:54 PM
Everyone in the field of Philosophy thinks Zizek is a colossal faggot.

I forgot who this guy was and the first sentence on his wikipedia says he's a "marxist philosopher".  :rolleyes: Go figure.

Come to think of it, anyone who refers to themselves as a philosopher is most likely a tremendous faggot reeking of unbridled arrogance.
"Philosopher" means "I want all the fun of coming up with ideas and theories and none of the responsibility of making them testable and falsifiable"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on May 16, 2014, 05:56:46 AM
Being a philosopher back in the day was an accomplishment because its the closest thing they had to scientists.

To call yourself a philosopher nowadays is like a doctor today saying hes "something of an alchemist"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on May 16, 2014, 12:00:47 PM
I had no idea who Zizek was until I saw him mentioned in CineD, and then again, and again, and again... Sounds like a faggot though.

A friend of mine fancies himself as some stupid film critic and he'll go on these stupid 888 rants about a movie and I'll just be like "So did you like the movie or what?"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on May 16, 2014, 12:04:37 PM
Teenage Mutant Nigga Turtles

Quote from: Nipplebox" post="429378941
(http://i.imgur.com/FqQd01r.jpg)

If the existence of racial messaging in TMNT is still in doubt, note their status as an underclass and the visual of the city pushing them down. They wear tribal colors and symbols for differentiation (since they "look alike") and forge a clandestine existence in the labyrinth of the city's waste disposal system--and in fact their existence is the result of toxic waste, a byproduct of the industrial class that rejects them even though it's responsible for them.

"Turtle power" is their "nigga". They wear ironic masks that hide nothing of their true nature, and they decorate their scavenged property with racial imagery ("turtle van"), mimicking and mocking the culture that benefits from their existence as secret crime-fighters. Though Americanized, they love being turtles and make no apologies about it. Despite a friendship with April, there is no mixing of the races thanks to her romance with Casey Jones; additionally, as SMG noted, there is now a sibling relationship explored in the new film that allies April's plight with that of the turtles.

(http://i.imgur.com/eHpzAef.jpg)

They hide from the authorities in the shadowy mazes of neglect only urban explorers would dare step foot in, like the minorities scattered by Giuliani's 1980s police sweeps (some of whom still live animalistically in the abandoned hollows they found years ago). All their property is scavenged or self-built. Yet these dregs have power, and it comes directly from their nature as animal-human hybrids. Society's attempt to categorize causes a chemical reaction in the radioactive ooze, and the mutation itself is a challenge of the status quo.

Yet the radiophobia of their mutant nature is overcome by their appealing teenage qualities. The turtles are a kid-friendly category crisis, and though they are transformative, their sewer life symbolizes the fate of model minorities as ultimately unacceptable for integration despite defending America against the bad kind of minority in the Foot Clan. Even in the comics, after aliens revealed themselves to the world, the turtles were only able to travel in the open by posing as aliens themselves.

Notice that these new turtles are even more monstrous--tall, freakish, and ambiguously human. They're decorated with a mishmash of cultural and generational iconography, from samurai armor to wearable computing. Their CG faces embrace the uncanny valley and further defy categorization.
I hope this a lame joke, but CineD being CineD, it's probably not.


 :clint: :razor:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 16, 2014, 12:18:15 PM
TVIV and CineD: "Turtle power" is their "nigga"  :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on May 16, 2014, 12:22:31 PM
Yeah but how do you explain their love for pizza and not fried chicken?  Also its Donatello not DeQuanatello.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rockchalk on May 16, 2014, 01:11:15 PM
Giuliani's "police sweeps" were famous for putting people in jail, not in the sewers. They were about getting petty criminals OFF the streets. Also, they happened at the very end of his term beginning in 1998, not in the 80s, when Giuliani was a federal prosecutor going after the Mafia and white-collar crime.

I know this is the least dumb thing about "cartoon ninja turtles as secret race war propaganda" but it irks me that these people can never get even the most basic factual stuff right.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: a bad guy on May 16, 2014, 01:12:22 PM
Factual information tends to distort their SJW message.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Watcher on May 16, 2014, 01:19:33 PM
Teenage Mutant Nigga Turtles

Quote from: Nipplebox" post="429378941
(http://i.imgur.com/FqQd01r.jpg)

If the existence of racial messaging in TMNT is still in doubt, note their status as an underclass and the visual of the city pushing them down. They wear tribal colors and symbols for differentiation (since they "look alike") and forge a clandestine existence in the labyrinth of the city's waste disposal system--and in fact their existence is the result of toxic waste, a byproduct of the industrial class that rejects them even though it's responsible for them.

"Turtle power" is their "nigga". They wear ironic masks that hide nothing of their true nature, and they decorate their scavenged property with racial imagery ("turtle van"), mimicking and mocking the culture that benefits from their existence as secret crime-fighters. Though Americanized, they love being turtles and make no apologies about it. Despite a friendship with April, there is no mixing of the races thanks to her romance with Casey Jones; additionally, as SMG noted, there is now a sibling relationship explored in the new film that allies April's plight with that of the turtles.

(http://i.imgur.com/eHpzAef.jpg)

They hide from the authorities in the shadowy mazes of neglect only urban explorers would dare step foot in, like the minorities scattered by Giuliani's 1980s police sweeps (some of whom still live animalistically in the abandoned hollows they found years ago). All their property is scavenged or self-built. Yet these dregs have power, and it comes directly from their nature as animal-human hybrids. Society's attempt to categorize causes a chemical reaction in the radioactive ooze, and the mutation itself is a challenge of the status quo.

Yet the radiophobia of their mutant nature is overcome by their appealing teenage qualities. The turtles are a kid-friendly category crisis, and though they are transformative, their sewer life symbolizes the fate of model minorities as ultimately unacceptable for integration despite defending America against the bad kind of minority in the Foot Clan. Even in the comics, after aliens revealed themselves to the world, the turtles were only able to travel in the open by posing as aliens themselves.

Notice that these new turtles are even more monstrous--tall, freakish, and ambiguously human. They're decorated with a mishmash of cultural and generational iconography, from samurai armor to wearable computing. Their CG faces embrace the uncanny valley and further defy categorization.
I hope this a lame joke, but CineD being CineD, it's probably not.


 :clint: :razor:
What I got when I searched Teenage Mutant Nigga Turtles, a wasted afternoon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJspVE355Do
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on May 16, 2014, 02:42:54 PM
TVIV and CineD: "Turtle power" is their "nigga"

Wonder how many times he backspaced over then re-typed that word, re-thinking it, later there was much hovering over the post button unsure whether to click or not. His mind wandered to his great-grandfather whom he'd heard stories about his single-man ammoless bayonet-charge into a kraut machine gun hole and he thought "I can do this."
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 16, 2014, 02:55:03 PM
There's hundreds of books, films, and televisions shows that specifically address race in America and these faggots would prefer analyzing cartoons created to sell toys to the same demographic happy meals are marketed to. Ill never understand goons
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 16, 2014, 02:59:22 PM
There's hundreds of books, films, and televisions shows that specifically address race in America and these faggots would prefer analyzing cartoons created to sell toys to the same demographic happy meals are marketed to. Ill never understand goons

"The Boy Who Didn't Want To Grow Up (And Is Probably On The Spectrum)"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on May 16, 2014, 03:02:17 PM
Occupation is one of the absolute worst tviv posters. He's so fucking strident and he's in SJW overdrive. There are few posters on SA that irritate the shit out of me, and he's way up there

lol do you have a source on this?  that guy is the worst.  one time he went into an epileptic fit that a tviv dude (edit: itt it was precision) was literally a pedophile rapist because he dated a 16 year old when he was 18
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 16, 2014, 03:03:17 PM
Occupation is one of the absolute worst tviv posters. He's so fucking strident and he's in SJW overdrive. There are few posters on SA that irritate the shit out of me, and he's way up there

lol do you have a source on this?  that guy is the worst.  one time he went into an epileptic fit that a tviv dude was literally a pedophile rapist because he dated a 16 year old when he was 18

I got called a pedophile on SA because I turned 16 while dating a 14 year old.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 16, 2014, 03:06:00 PM
Yeah Occupation is a bit quick on these things, the same way that :diabetes: was really quick (lol, as if) to start screaming about misogyny and rape


:adam:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on May 16, 2014, 03:11:08 PM
realized i quoted the wrong post, was asking what the source was on him being "homeless" because that is hilarious
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 16, 2014, 03:12:47 PM
well he's not homeless now last time I saw him on irc he was talking about playing mario-kart and listening to japanese techno all weekend
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on May 16, 2014, 03:29:47 PM
There sure are a lot of dumb turtle powers in TVIV.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: rockchalk on May 16, 2014, 03:30:38 PM
There's hundreds of books, films, and televisions shows that specifically address race in America and these faggots would prefer analyzing cartoons created to sell toys to the same demographic happy meals are marketed to. Ill never understand goons

every time i see a strident teenage idiot yelling at me that i need to recognize that the flavor of the month rapper is a "genius" all i hear is that he's trying to assuage his white-guilt by being as obnoxiously NOTRACIST as possible, but he cannot name one black poet, philosopher, or scientist because he's a retard who only took critical race theory in school and doesn't know anything about american intellectual history
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: a bad guy on May 16, 2014, 08:37:59 PM
There's hundreds of books, films, and televisions shows that specifically address race in America and these faggots would prefer analyzing cartoons created to sell toys to the same demographic happy meals are marketed to. Ill never understand goons

every time i see a strident teenage idiot yelling at me that i need to recognize that the flavor of the month rapper is a "genius" all i hear is that he's trying to assuage his white-guilt by being as obnoxiously NOTRACIST as possible, but he cannot name one black poet, philosopher, or scientist because he's a retard who only took critical race theory in school and doesn't know anything about american intellectual history

George Washington Carver was quite cool.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on May 16, 2014, 08:42:23 PM
Teenage Mutant Nigga Turtles

Quote from: Nipplebox" post="429378941
(http://i.imgur.com/FqQd01r.jpg)

If the existence of racial messaging in TMNT is still in doubt, note their status as an underclass and the visual of the city pushing them down. They wear tribal colors and symbols for differentiation (since they "look alike") and forge a clandestine existence in the labyrinth of the city's waste disposal system--and in fact their existence is the result of toxic waste, a byproduct of the industrial class that rejects them even though it's responsible for them.

"Turtle power" is their "nigga". They wear ironic masks that hide nothing of their true nature, and they decorate their scavenged property with racial imagery ("turtle van"), mimicking and mocking the culture that benefits from their existence as secret crime-fighters. Though Americanized, they love being turtles and make no apologies about it. Despite a friendship with April, there is no mixing of the races thanks to her romance with Casey Jones; additionally, as SMG noted, there is now a sibling relationship explored in the new film that allies April's plight with that of the turtles.

(http://i.imgur.com/eHpzAef.jpg)

They hide from the authorities in the shadowy mazes of neglect only urban explorers would dare step foot in, like the minorities scattered by Giuliani's 1980s police sweeps (some of whom still live animalistically in the abandoned hollows they found years ago). All their property is scavenged or self-built. Yet these dregs have power, and it comes directly from their nature as animal-human hybrids. Society's attempt to categorize causes a chemical reaction in the radioactive ooze, and the mutation itself is a challenge of the status quo.

Yet the radiophobia of their mutant nature is overcome by their appealing teenage qualities. The turtles are a kid-friendly category crisis, and though they are transformative, their sewer life symbolizes the fate of model minorities as ultimately unacceptable for integration despite defending America against the bad kind of minority in the Foot Clan. Even in the comics, after aliens revealed themselves to the world, the turtles were only able to travel in the open by posing as aliens themselves.

Notice that these new turtles are even more monstrous--tall, freakish, and ambiguously human. They're decorated with a mishmash of cultural and generational iconography, from samurai armor to wearable computing. Their CG faces embrace the uncanny valley and further defy categorization.
I hope this a lame joke, but CineD being CineD, it's probably not.


 :clint: :razor:

Fucking lol only a goon faggot would see this far into a fucking 80s cartoon show made for children.  Jesus fucking Christ it was just a show about ninjas fighting crime, hanging out with a tomboy reporter, and eating pizza.  When I was growing up, this show fucking owned.  It wasn't anything other "hay did you see that cool episode Saturday?" It didn't have any goddamned messages beyond "good defeats evil." Fuckken goons.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on May 16, 2014, 09:33:27 PM
I wonder if they know that the original comic the TMNT are based on has them all wearing red and stabbing dudes in the face a lot. As opposed to the relatively harmless cartoon TV show, Bloods stabbing people helps the "nigga" thing more, actually.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on May 16, 2014, 09:44:33 PM

Here's my five thousand word essay on subtle criticism of Reaganomics by The Snorks.  :goon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on May 16, 2014, 10:44:57 PM
Teenage Mutant Nigga Turtles

Quote from: Nipplebox" post="429378941
(http://i.imgur.com/FqQd01r.jpg)
FAGGOT FUCKING WORDS ABOUT NIGGER TURTLES

Quote
What I got when I searched Teenage Mutant Nigga Turtles, a wasted afternoon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJspVE355Do


This may have been glossed over or been seen by everyone but me and your mom but this is a good video. ty wtf i cant figure out this quote nest this is bullshit god damn turtles last time i stop save your fucking ass when i see you on the road
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on May 17, 2014, 12:52:41 AM
I wonder if they know that the original comic the TMNT are based on has them all wearing red and stabbing dudes in the face a lot. As opposed to the relatively harmless cartoon TV show, Bloods stabbing people helps the "nigga" thing more, actually.

I remember once as a kid, somehow finding the original comic books.  They were violent as fuck, and kill shredder pretty much immediately.  Donatello literally tosses him off a building after Leonardo impales him.  He survives through ~comic book magic~ and so then Leo cuts his head off and the four of them literally take his body and burn it and scatter the ashes in the Hudson so he can never be "resurrected".

That's all I know, I heard at one point Leonardo gets his arms cut off and Ralph becomes "the Shredder".  I wasn't ever big into comic books, I just remember reading those from the mid-80s.

Anyway, they were just fucking cartoons, they didn't have any deep fucking message.  Goons always ruin everything.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on May 17, 2014, 02:22:37 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/FYALHzk.png)

lol, goons are such faggots
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on May 17, 2014, 05:43:28 AM
Hannibal is a show about serial killers and the criminally insane, as well as being one of the most disturbing and graphically violent shows ever aired on American network television. The subject of sex crimes was probably going to be broached sooner or later.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 10:04:10 AM
Hannibal yesterday showed what I think is the most disturbing and shocking thing I've ever seen on television. In TVIV it's like 5 pages of goons crying and dry-heaving like faggots
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 17, 2014, 02:36:32 PM
What was it?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 02:58:42 PM
Well you see a guy (Mason Verger, for those who have seen the movies or read the books) cutting off scrapes of his face, giving them to dogs and then he cuts his nose off and eats it on screen, mentioning how it feels like chicken gizzard while high as fuck and encouraged to do so by Hannibal.


I love horror movies and that scene had me recoiling in :stonk:. I genuinely can't believe they showed that on network tv. For a show that is extremely graphic and violent, this took the cake.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 17, 2014, 02:59:52 PM
groce
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 03:09:38 PM
You have no idea, that scene was like 4 minutes long between the dogs, talking and nose eating

trigger warning: special effects















(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/8e486fd91e0a4ba6cb471854e5d12eb2.jpg)
(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/c1cb88f6d56c41fac1b1ba1b6850ac04.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/0fc05ca3e8004314c3c38a0f88a26e34.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/87d9a13f0666434cc32ecae120da23e6.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/17803402e5274455c44aed307874344b.gif)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 17, 2014, 03:10:24 PM
groce
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 17, 2014, 04:00:46 PM
(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/8e486fd91e0a4ba6cb471854e5d12eb2.jpg)
(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/c1cb88f6d56c41fac1b1ba1b6850ac04.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/0fc05ca3e8004314c3c38a0f88a26e34.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/87d9a13f0666434cc32ecae120da23e6.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/17803402e5274455c44aed307874344b.gif)

Holy fucking shit this kind of stuff is allowed on NBC/network TV now? (Not that I have a problem with that!)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 17, 2014, 04:43:45 PM
BTW remember that faggot K. Waste who was writing huge walls of text earlier in the thread about gender politics & racism in Godzilla films?

(http://0.academia-photos.com/1596295/558879/696915/s200_ian.carsia.jpg)

http://ithaca.academia.edu/IanCarsia

Research Interests: History, Art History, Art, Art Theory, Race and Ethnicity, Film Theory, Critical Race Theory, Film Analysis, Film History, Race and Racism, Philosophy of Film, and Film Aesthetics

His blog: http://kennywastevseverything.blogspot.com/?view=classic

:tom:

Peak goon.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on May 17, 2014, 04:46:16 PM
BTW remember that faggot K. Waste who was writing huge walls of text earlier in the thread about gender politics & racism in Godzilla films?

(http://0.academia-photos.com/1596295/558879/696915/s200_ian.carsia.jpg)

http://ithaca.academia.edu/IanCarsia

Research Interests: History, Art History, Art, Art Theory, Race and Ethnicity, Film Theory, Critical Race Theory, Film Analysis, Film History, Race and Racism, Philosophy of Film, and Film Aesthetics

His blog: http://kennywastevseverything.blogspot.com/?view=classic

:tom:

Peak goon.

 :facepalm:

He should be banned from ever watching or listening to a movie again.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 04:51:47 PM
you linked to his blog, but didn't mention his poems?

Quote
Money
by Kenny Waste

Green blood, black with ink
All I've got is your Spartan hair
A photo in my leather hand
A leaf, a tiger swallow tail
My thanksgiving
I'll keep my dream journal
I'll keep that frozen night
My green jowls torpedoing me
While you remained - at least, in stupor -
Upright
How glorious
You ursine paragon
You full o' blood, great machine
Tearing in warped spasm
Tell me a riddle, then
Flay me when I fail
Slice your scythe like this
And take the gold that you find there
If any
Or if you fancy that
Gaudy stuff

Quote
Don't Ask
by Kenny Waste

Don’t even say such foolish things
I won’t hear them
Wait, let me get the phone
Convene for the next DSM
You’ll have a new disorder
‘Cuckoo’
Better yet
‘Cockatoo’
Defined—
An incomprehensible inability to perceive one’s own beauty
Spectrum of traits include
Shallow apprehension of how you melt those around you like a roaring fireplace soothing red, frosty foots
Sound familiar?
How about
Obtuse doubts about your charms?
You’ve been a patient with no doctor
And while me expertise is not this
My anecdotes galvanize me nonetheless
So do not ask me to not love you
That’s impossible
I’ll hear no more scriptures, madame
You are yet to read your own
In apocalypse more magnificent than any prophecy before
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Procrustes on May 17, 2014, 04:55:33 PM
I remember reading that scene in the books. In the context of the series it makes sense, but isn't way over the top.

I guess networks gotta try and keep up with cable tv in the race to the bottom.


Edit: whoa there really are worse things than slam poetry  :stonk:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 04:57:55 PM
still not as bad as his actual written words (paragraph selected at random):

Quote
But, at the risk of absolutism, any sober bet should go to a quieter example of comically obtuse media illiteracy and political correctness: the briefly infamous, ‘was it or wasn’t it’-rape scene in “On All Fours” (Lena Dunham), an episode of HBO’s Girls (2012-present). Far be it in the best interests of any viewer or critic to treat a neophyte of turgid mumblecore cinema, much less a protégé of Judd Apatow, as the artiste exemplar of alternative entertainments, but the anticlimactic conclusion of “On All Fours,” at least for a moment, became the perfect imaginary microcosm from which the insubstantial dialogue regarding rape and rape culture both within and outside of critical feminism came out. Chiefly, Dunham’s response to the controversy becomes especially indicative that the most viscerally potent art and entertainment often entirely escapes the intent of the author:

:tuss:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 05:01:35 PM
:stare: that third line

Quote
Dog
by Kenny Waste

Circles the cold spot like a passenger plane
Parks his belly there
Cleans the tip of his penis
Looks at alpha, rocking chair
Concerned, always concerned
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 05:07:48 PM
ok that guy is a major creep, he writes about the awakening sexual feelings of teenage girls (http://kennywastevseverything.blogspot.com/2012/10/beasts-girls-on-developing-female.html) and has taken  a series of pictures using worn panties in fields and next to flowers because art~ (http://kennywastevseverything.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-adventures-of-dirty-panties-series.html) (entitled 'The Adventure of Dirty Panties series')

also, this other poem

Quote
My Little Doll
by Kenny Waste

Good night, my little doll
Slumber, slumber, slumber
The willow will settle your vacancy

Bye-bye, my little doll
'Til daylight summons the dewdrops
Spark will catch fire between

Good morning, my little doll
What fancies my mind's bride
The ballet of play is at noon

:aatrek:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 05:13:24 PM
Quote
Furthermore, these books (and the slew of quickly published knockoffs) are reflective of a very modern ambiguity about both the distinction between childhood and adulthood (What is a young adult?) as well as the sexual health and development of young women. Meyer’s books offer young girls transgressive sexual spaces in a sea of media that casually ignores the female sexual experience. There would even appear to be a deep fear of developing female sexuality not at all uncharacteristic of Victorian and Romantic eras. Cunninlingus, especially during adolescence, is a subject highly underrepresented in both media and critical scholarship.

The vagina itself is virtually never presented in an erotic context to developing girls and young women. Instead, it is constructed as dirty, mysterious, frightening, humorous, or “as a source of concern through advice columns, advertisements for feminine hygiene products, expectations that hair be removed through shaving or waxing, and promises to improve vaginal appearance through female genital plastic surgery.”

Bemoaning that due to patriarchy as well as Romantic and Puritan ethics, there are not enough books and movies that showcase teenage girls getting head, and that their vaginas should be discussed in a sex-positive fashion

:stare:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Renegade Jew on May 17, 2014, 05:17:37 PM
Looks like we have another doxx to drop on SA.

K. Waste/Ian Carsia should be crucified.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 05:28:05 PM
Yeah he writes a lot of words about sex in (http://kennywastevseverything.blogspot.com/2012/09/whats-little-girl-like-you-doing-in.html) fairy tales (http://kennywastevseverything.blogspot.ca/2013/03/phallus-in-wonderland-sam-raimis-oz.html?view=flipcard) and how it relates to children and censorship

and creepy poems

Quote
My Secret Letter to You
by Kenny Waste

Beloved,
 Know that the one who loves you
 Imagines you from here
 A thousand motives are beneath thee
 In this letter, stain it
 the --- incomprehending
 I can't write it
 It's too awful
 My starvation is my specter upon your brow
 A double nightmare of your pain
 I dream myself gold eyes to look into your own
 I dream myself gold hair, that melts a million colors of your fascinations
 I dream myself red lips like no silver moon ever dreamed
 I dream myself beloved
 I dream myself beloved for beloved you
 So that aghast at bay
 My vulgarity, that is...
 Ah, but alas...
 I would fail thee
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Renegade Jew on May 17, 2014, 05:37:46 PM
Ian Carsia (goon: K. Waste):

https://twitter.com/ICarsia
https://www.youtube.com/user/BannedCinema
http://www.ithaca.edu/fleff/blogs/fleff_intern_voices/introductions:_ian_carsia,_fleff_blogger/

(http://i.imgur.com/hlhlyuy.png)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 17, 2014, 06:03:22 PM
lol what a turbo faggot
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on May 17, 2014, 06:19:41 PM
I haven't worked out in 10 years, haven't been in a fight in 22. Rest assured guys, I could kick that faggot's ass without half trying.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on May 17, 2014, 06:47:42 PM
Yeah maybe it's just the whole 'having a vagina' thing but it's a LITTLE bothersome that a grown man is obsessed on both a personal and "academic" level, with the developing genitalia of young girls.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on May 17, 2014, 07:24:45 PM

This fuck's probably going to inspire an episode of Hannibal.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on May 17, 2014, 07:43:26 PM
Holy fucking shit this kind of stuff is allowed on NBC/network TV now? (Not that I have a problem with that!)

That's cool, but NO MIDDLE FINGERS OR SAYING SHIT.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nipplebox on May 17, 2014, 07:44:17 PM
Giuliani's "police sweeps" were famous for putting people in jail, not in the sewers. They were about getting petty criminals OFF the streets. Also, they happened at the very end of his term beginning in 1998, not in the 80s, when Giuliani was a federal prosecutor going after the Mafia and white-collar crime.

I know this is the least dumb thing about "cartoon ninja turtles as secret race war propaganda" but it irks me that these people can never get even the most basic factual stuff right.

TVIV and CineD: "Turtle power" is their "nigga"

Wonder how many times he backspaced over then re-typed that word, re-thinking it, later there was much hovering over the post button unsure whether to click or not. His mind wandered to his great-grandfather whom he'd heard stories about his single-man ammoless bayonet-charge into a kraut machine gun hole and he thought "I can do this."

Teenage Mutant Nigga Turtles

Fucking lol only a goon faggot would see this far into a fucking 80s cartoon show made for children.  Jesus fucking Christ it was just a show about ninjas fighting crime, hanging out with a tomboy reporter, and eating pizza.  When I was growing up, this show fucking owned.  It wasn't anything other "hay did you see that cool episode Saturday?" It didn't have any goddamned messages beyond "good defeats evil." Fuckken goons.

lmao you people
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 17, 2014, 07:44:59 PM
Get out turtle powa
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: OSI on May 17, 2014, 08:03:16 PM
"My dead gay forum has been insulted. Time to post in all lower cases to show how little I care."
:say:
:goon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nipplebox on May 17, 2014, 08:57:29 PM
cut me to the quick, why don't ya, on this, forum about another forum. :reagan:just don't quote anymore of my posts!!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: I fucking hate goons on May 17, 2014, 08:59:22 PM
still not as bad as his actual written words (paragraph selected at random):

Quote
But, at the risk of absolutism, any sober bet should go to a quieter example of comically obtuse media illiteracy and political correctness: the briefly infamous, ‘was it or wasn’t it’-rape scene in “On All Fours” (Lena Dunham), an episode of HBO’s Girls (2012-present). Far be it in the best interests of any viewer or critic to treat a neophyte of turgid mumblecore cinema, much less a protégé of Judd Apatow, as the artiste exemplar of alternative entertainments, but the anticlimactic conclusion of “On All Fours,” at least for a moment, became the perfect imaginary microcosm from which the insubstantial dialogue regarding rape and rape culture both within and outside of critical feminism came out. Chiefly, Dunham’s response to the controversy becomes especially indicative that the most viscerally potent art and entertainment often entirely escapes the intent of the author:

:tuss:

i hate people who write like this
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 17, 2014, 09:00:19 PM
honestly i thought you were mostly trolling cined, but the fact that you've registered here and bring up that shit once we've all moved on to something else leads me to think you really are a gigantic faggot who wrote that earnestly
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nipplebox on May 17, 2014, 09:25:52 PM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on May 17, 2014, 09:32:26 PM
still not as bad as his actual written words (paragraph selected at random):

Quote
But, at the risk of absolutism, any sober bet should go to a quieter example of comically obtuse media illiteracy and political correctness: the briefly infamous, ‘was it or wasn’t it’-rape scene in “On All Fours” (Lena Dunham), an episode of HBO’s Girls (2012-present). Far be it in the best interests of any viewer or critic to treat a neophyte of turgid mumblecore cinema, much less a protégé of Judd Apatow, as the artiste exemplar of alternative entertainments, but the anticlimactic conclusion of “On All Fours,” at least for a moment, became the perfect imaginary microcosm from which the insubstantial dialogue regarding rape and rape culture both within and outside of critical feminism came out. Chiefly, Dunham’s response to the controversy becomes especially indicative that the most viscerally potent art and entertainment often entirely escapes the intent of the author:

:tuss:

i hate people who write like this

Run-on sentences are horrid.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Procrustes on May 17, 2014, 10:15:13 PM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA

Hold up. Are you the guy writing 10099 words about the teenage ninja turtles?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on May 17, 2014, 11:45:34 PM
still not as bad as his actual written words (paragraph selected at random):

Quote
But, at the risk of absolutism, any sober bet should go to a quieter example of comically obtuse media illiteracy and political correctness: the briefly infamous, ‘was it or wasn’t it’-rape scene in “On All Fours” (Lena Dunham), an episode of HBO’s Girls (2012-present). Far be it in the best interests of any viewer or critic to treat a neophyte of turgid mumblecore cinema, much less a protégé of Judd Apatow, as the artiste exemplar of alternative entertainments, but the anticlimactic conclusion of “On All Fours,” at least for a moment, became the perfect imaginary microcosm from which the insubstantial dialogue regarding rape and rape culture both within and outside of critical feminism came out. Chiefly, Dunham’s response to the controversy becomes especially indicative that the most viscerally potent art and entertainment often entirely escapes the intent of the author:

:tuss:

i hate people who write like this

Oh, hey, word salad is even worse when it's a pretentious cined goon doing it. I'll take a Caro conspiracy screed over this shit anytime
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nipplebox on May 17, 2014, 11:52:15 PM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA

Hold up. Are you the guy writing 10099 words about the teenage ninja turtles?

i figured "turtle power = nigga" was a giveaway that it's a sendup of smg's posts. nobody in cined even bothered to challenge it because it has jargon and pictures
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on May 18, 2014, 06:01:43 AM
You have no idea, that scene was like 4 minutes long between the dogs, talking and nose eating

trigger warning: special effects















(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/8e486fd91e0a4ba6cb471854e5d12eb2.jpg)
(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/c1cb88f6d56c41fac1b1ba1b6850ac04.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/0fc05ca3e8004314c3c38a0f88a26e34.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/87d9a13f0666434cc32ecae120da23e6.gif)(http://img2.tvtome.com/i/u/17803402e5274455c44aed307874344b.gif)

"Yeah, well, all this hyperviolence is fine to show and I'mma keep watching but if they ever get to Buffalo Bill, they really will have to rework the character because trans. (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3611406&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=104#post428536905)
"

I wonder what the goon reaction will be if Morpheus lets slip just in dialogue that The Tooth Fairy sticks shards of mirror up pussies. I mean, I can take seeing a guy eating his own face but even hearing that a serial killer's MO might have a sexual component - you know, like real life - would just be too much for me...
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on May 18, 2014, 09:39:34 AM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA

Hold up. Are you the guy writing 10099 words about the teenage ninja turtles?

i figured "turtle power = nigga" was a giveaway that it's a sendup of smg's posts. nobody in cined even bothered to challenge it because it has jargon and pictures

We are through the looking glass with this stuff.  This is now bizarro land.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on May 18, 2014, 09:58:26 AM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA

Hold up. Are you the guy writing 10099 words about the teenage ninja turtles?

i figured "turtle power = nigga" was a giveaway that it's a sendup of smg's posts. nobody in cined even bothered to challenge it because it has jargon and pictures

We are through the looking glass with this stuff.  This is now bizarro land.

If it was a troll, the fact that we're to a point where that 888 was indistinguishable from :goonthink:...

our country is doomed.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on May 18, 2014, 10:13:12 AM
Poe's Law comes home to roost.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on May 18, 2014, 11:11:03 PM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA

Hold up. Are you the guy writing 10099 words about the teenage ninja turtles?

i figured "turtle power = nigga" was a giveaway that it's a sendup of smg's posts. nobody in cined even bothered to challenge it because it has jargon and pictures

(http://i.imgur.com/VvbeoOe.gif)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on May 18, 2014, 11:35:03 PM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA

Hold up. Are you the guy writing 10099 words about the teenage ninja turtles?

i figured "turtle power = nigga" was a giveaway that it's a sendup of smg's posts. nobody in cined even bothered to challenge it because it has jargon and pictures

We need a Poe's Law badge for this nipplefucker right here.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Sum Beezy on May 19, 2014, 01:59:55 AM
yeah, i kinda missed the boat, if you will, by replying to something 1 page old. i should probably just get out! j/k i've been lurking for a awhile to read the hilarious takedowns of those goons over at SA

Hold up. Are you the guy writing 10099 words about the teenage ninja turtles?

i figured "turtle power = nigga" was a giveaway that it's a sendup of smg's posts. nobody in cined even bothered to challenge it because it has jargon and pictures

My turtle power  :obama:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Muh Dick on May 19, 2014, 11:36:18 AM
Well you see a guy (Mason Verger, for those who have seen the movies or read the books) cutting off scrapes of his face, giving them to dogs and then he cuts his nose off and eats it on screen, mentioning how it feels like chicken gizzard while high as fuck and encouraged to do so by Hannibal.


I love horror movies and that scene had me recoiling in :stonk:. I genuinely can't believe they showed that on network tv. For a show that is extremely graphic and violent, this took the cake.

Based on a real incident (NYC, 1980s):

http://www.practicalhomicide.com/Research/MasonVerger.htm

"It's an offering to Big Bird."
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on May 19, 2014, 01:28:44 PM
It's PYF but it should still count:

Quote from: The Midniter" post="429548496
I caught Police Academy in a hotel around Christmastime and I was shocked at what passed for humor back then (1984).  It was like racist joke-sexist joke-physical gag-racist joke-racist joke-racist joke-physical gag-sexist joke and on and on.  Just awful shit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on May 19, 2014, 01:49:38 PM
I remember as a little kid every time I saw Lt. Harris scream DUMB. FAT. JIGABOO! I literally shook the rest of the day. Which sucked cause I watched that movie at least 3 times a week.


Actually wait never mind, I laughed a whole lot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: I fucking hate goons on May 19, 2014, 09:29:04 PM
It's PYF but it should still count:

Quote from: The Midniter" post="429548496
I caught Police Academy in a hotel around Christmastime and I was shocked at what passed for humor back then (1984).  It was like racist joke-sexist joke-physical gag-racist joke-racist joke-racist joke-physical gag-sexist joke and on and on.  Just awful shit.

lmao that shit still passes as humor

wonder what that fag laughs at. prob straight people.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 19, 2014, 10:52:18 PM
[22:15] <Occupation> this viral video is getting
[22:15] <Occupation> ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh\
[22:15] <oxxi> did you see how many h's that wa
[22:15] <oxxi> s
[22:15] <oxxi> he bleeds for you
[22:15] <Occupation> oh horray, boobs
[22:16] <Occupation> I get to look at boobs
[22:16] <Occupation> it's a sad day for a guy like me, a liberal feminist, to get excited over looking at network tv boobs
[22:16] <Occupation> when there's a whole wide world of porn to look at
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on May 19, 2014, 11:03:22 PM
It's PYF but it should still count:

Quote from: The Midniter" post="429548496
I caught Police Academy in a hotel around Christmastime and I was shocked at what passed for humor back then (1984).  It was like racist joke-sexist joke-physical gag-racist joke-racist joke-racist joke-physical gag-sexist joke and on and on.  Just awful shit.

lmao that shit still passes as humor

wonder what that fag laughs at. prob straight people.

All the stuff we consider classic comedy like Airplane! or Naked Gun can only be considered super triggering by modern goon standards. The fact would almost be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on May 19, 2014, 11:15:45 PM
I watched Biodome the other day and there's an attempted rape scene that I found to be quite problematic.   :christina:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Renegade Jew on May 19, 2014, 11:39:08 PM
So, any update on the faggot K. Waste (userid 208879, regdate Feb 27 2014) aka Ian Carsia; who writes 888 about making Godzilla more feminist on SA, but whines on his blog about how fairy tales should be sexualized?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on May 20, 2014, 12:06:27 AM
It's PYF but it should still count:

Quote from: The Midniter" post="429548496
I caught Police Academy in a hotel around Christmastime and I was shocked at what passed for humor back then (1984).  It was like racist joke-sexist joke-physical gag-racist joke-racist joke-racist joke-physical gag-sexist joke and on and on.  Just awful shit.

lmao that shit still passes as humor

wonder what that fag laughs at. prob straight people.

All the stuff we consider classic comedy like Airplane! or Naked Gun can only be considered super triggering by modern goon standards. The fact would almost be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

blazing saddles would send a sjw goon into a coma
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on May 20, 2014, 05:33:29 AM
I watched Biodome the other day and there's an attempted rape scene that I found to be quite problematic.   :christina:

Why would anyone voluntarily watch Biodome?  Do you hate your eyes?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on May 20, 2014, 07:30:00 AM

Goons would probably be triggered by an episode of Golden Girls.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Muh Dick on May 20, 2014, 09:12:35 AM
So, any update on the faggot K. Waste (userid 208879, regdate Feb 27 2014) aka Ian Carsia; who writes 888 about making Godzilla more feminist on SA, but whines on his blog about how fairy tales should be sexualized?

How the fuck do you make Godzilla more feminist? Put a giant gaping lizard pussy on the rubber suit? Jesus Christ.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Ghostse on May 20, 2014, 12:02:58 PM
So, any update on the faggot K. Waste (userid 208879, regdate Feb 27 2014) aka Ian Carsia; who writes 888 about making Godzilla more feminist on SA, but whines on his blog about how fairy tales should be sexualized?

How the fuck do you make Godzilla more feminist? Put a giant gaping lizard pussy on the rubber suit? Jesus Christ.

http://www.geekedoutnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/smog.jpg

Hedorah's eyes were inspired bathroom graffiti of a vagina. So, there you go.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on May 20, 2014, 12:18:35 PM
So, any update on the faggot K. Waste (userid 208879, regdate Feb 27 2014) aka Ian Carsia; who writes 888 about making Godzilla more feminist on SA, but whines on his blog about how fairy tales should be sexualized?

How the fuck do you make Godzilla more feminist? Put a giant gaping lizard pussy on the rubber suit? Jesus Christ.

when godzilla crushes a building theres a sign CG'd in that says "MRA fedora factory and PUA Hangout"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on May 22, 2014, 02:34:18 AM
So, any update on the faggot K. Waste (userid 208879, regdate Feb 27 2014) aka Ian Carsia; who writes 888 about making Godzilla more feminist on SA, but whines on his blog about how fairy tales should be sexualized?

How the fuck do you make Godzilla more feminist? Put a giant gaping lizard pussy on the rubber suit? Jesus Christ.

Make one of the buildings he knocks over like PATRIARCHY ENTERPRISES HQ or something
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on May 22, 2014, 05:36:23 AM
dont rape my lame jokes i will end you rape artist.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on May 22, 2014, 02:22:24 PM
just want to echo what was said earlier, the stickied thread where Occupation (sorry, "E PLURIBUS ANUS") goes into fits of apopleptic rage about how racist and terrible A TIM ALLEN SITCOM is has been delivering pure gold, by which of-course i mean hilarious goons.txt

seriously check it out for a larf-n-barf
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 22, 2014, 02:23:53 PM
Occupation is hands down the worst goon in TVIV, and working really hard to make that all star all over SA
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on May 22, 2014, 03:38:26 PM
just want to echo what was said earlier, the stickied thread where Occupation (sorry, "E PLURIBUS ANUS") goes into fits of apopleptic rage about how racist and terrible A TIM ALLEN SITCOM is has been delivering pure gold, by which of-course i mean hilarious goons.txt

seriously check it out for a larf-n-barf

You can tell he's one of the TVIV Chosen Ones because he did a Toxx Clause over a tv show and instead of getting banned, he got to watch a shitty tv show and post about it instead.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on May 22, 2014, 04:17:00 PM
over/under on Occupation being made mod and then losing said position because of major drama bombs
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 22, 2014, 04:18:11 PM
no way I think he's seen as way too unstable to ever make a mod. He's like :madgoon: personified and would just fucking go mad with power and lose it within like a week anyway
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 22, 2014, 07:32:02 PM
Everyone knows Occupation is a loser
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on May 22, 2014, 07:38:07 PM
Everyone knows Occupation is a loser

yea i'm p sure he's actually extremely UNpopular in tviv

like, even precision hates him, and that guy goes out of his way to kiss everyone's ass
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on May 22, 2014, 10:06:19 PM

Goons would probably be triggered by an episode of Golden Girls.

They're slut shaming Blanche!  :madgoon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 23, 2014, 04:46:36 AM
So, any update on the faggot K. Waste (userid 208879, regdate Feb 27 2014) aka Ian Carsia; who writes 888 about making Godzilla more feminist on SA, but whines on his blog about how fairy tales should be sexualized?

How the fuck do you make Godzilla more feminist? Put a giant gaping lizard pussy on the rubber suit? Jesus Christ.

For starters there was no Shezilla in the newest film for him to fuck.  :christina:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on May 23, 2014, 11:38:39 AM
Here's a funny post from tviv

Quote from: raditts" post="430019275
Aren't Aatrek jokes so old at this point that not even Aatrek would be interested in them?

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: jabba on May 23, 2014, 11:44:06 AM
 :nixon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on May 23, 2014, 01:16:56 PM
raditts is a p cool goon, the last of a dying breed
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 23, 2014, 01:18:01 PM
he has his fair share of faggot moments and bashed us before
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: VFW on May 23, 2014, 01:25:20 PM
he has his fair share of faggot moments and bashed us before

I know another person recently who fits this bill.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on May 23, 2014, 02:01:48 PM
he has his fair share of faggot moments and bashed us before

I know another person recently who fits this bill.

 :stewart:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Seasonal Foliage on May 23, 2014, 02:49:27 PM
he has his fair share of faggot moments and bashed us before

I know another person recently who fits this bill.

Ice Cold
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on May 26, 2014, 12:31:25 PM
So the current season of Hannibal just finished so I thought I'd go catch up on the giant pretentious safe-space abortion that is the thread. Some highlights so far:

What if Jodie Foster had a dick?

(http://i.imgur.com/lr4C2EN.png)

A dude makes the mistake of saying this chick...

(http://i.imgur.com/HVRRrZJ.jpg)

...who plays a lesbian on the show, is attractive.

(http://i.imgur.com/iKyp0mH.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/OZW03ar.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/dov2SYK.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/OU8C1Z9.png)


Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: VFW on May 26, 2014, 12:36:12 PM
This would make for a good movie

"In a time where heterosexuality is outlawed (other than Europe)..."

"One man...shows his illegal views on women..."

Dolph Lundgren is...

Straight Man

(coming Fall 2020)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Tranny Feet on May 26, 2014, 12:50:16 PM
Troon beauty pageant quarter-finalist, Damiya (pictured below) also joined the dogpile.

(http://i.imgur.com/7nrwqXP.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/3BcjZh1.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/IRjKh6h.png)

Remember: the dude said the hot chick was hot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on May 26, 2014, 12:52:37 PM
Bitchy little white knights accusing a normal-sounding guy of being a bitchy little white knight.

How precious.  :allears:

Come here when you earn your inevitable purple heart, Toadsniff.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on May 26, 2014, 12:54:55 PM
Troon beauty pageant quarter-finalist, Damiya (pictured below) also joined the dogpile.

(http://i.imgur.com/7nrwqXP.jpg)

Weird Gal Yankovic
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 26, 2014, 01:03:34 PM
Wanna bet Astrofig has got a fetlife account and a rape fanfiction library that would make :diabetes: proud?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on May 26, 2014, 01:26:20 PM
Holy shit the jaw on that.  She looks like a tiller wearing a stupid hat.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 26, 2014, 01:30:34 PM
She

 :facepalm: :lilal: :lolno:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SvM on May 26, 2014, 01:41:14 PM
She

 :facepalm: :lilal: :lolno:

I can understand how you think big tits aren't just for women.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Nig Disliker on May 26, 2014, 01:43:34 PM
Wanna bet Astrofig has got a fetlife account and a rape fanfiction library that would make :diabetes: proud?

He has some racy pictures of cis women on his (public) photobucket: http://s673.photobucket.com/user/Astrofig/library/?sort=3&page=1

You can tell it's his because of the SA .gifs on it.

Also some very triggering drawings: http://doodleordie.com/profile/astrofig
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: MY FURSONOUNS on May 26, 2014, 02:00:12 PM
So the current season of Hannibal just finished so I thought I'd go catch up on the giant pretentious safe-space abortion that is the thread. Some highlights so far:

What if Jodie Foster had a dick?

(http://i.imgur.com/lr4C2EN.png)

A dude makes this mistake of saying this chick...

(http://i.imgur.com/HVRRrZJ.jpg)

...who plays a lesbian on the show, is attractive.

(http://i.imgur.com/iKyp0mH.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/OZW03ar.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/dov2SYK.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/OU8C1Z9.png)

casually observing that a woman is attractive is the most efficient way to troll goons these days

it makes them SOOOOO ANGRY  :madgoon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on May 26, 2014, 02:19:34 PM
And there are obviously no women on SA to say anything about the men, and the gays on SA get a free pass, 'cause it's Patriarchy on Patriarchy ig.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 26, 2014, 02:28:45 PM
She

 :facepalm: :lilal: :lolno:

I can understand how you think big tits aren't just for women.
wat
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 26, 2014, 02:29:46 PM
he's saying you have bitch tits come on aran this ain't your first rodeo
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on May 26, 2014, 02:37:38 PM
he's saying you have bitch tits come on aran this ain't your first rodeo

Yeah but what does that have to do with me laughing at his calling a tranny a she
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Procrustes on May 26, 2014, 02:46:06 PM
Some people think trans women are actually women, Aran.  GET OVER IT ALREADY GOSH!!!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 26, 2014, 03:26:51 PM
he's saying you have bitch tits come on aran this ain't your first rodeo

if you'd seen aran's first rodeo, you'd know why he ain't keen to them anymore

(http://barbaradrake.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/hauling-out-dead-bull-by-jorge-vera.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 26, 2014, 05:34:07 PM
And there are obviously no women on SA to say anything about the men, and the gays on SA get a free pass, 'cause it's Patriarchy on Patriarchy ig.

Does referring to women as "females" bother you? Because referring to guys as "males" doesn't bother me.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on May 26, 2014, 05:39:02 PM
The outrage over "females" is the most offensive thing to me. It says a lot about the guygoon mentality that invents what girls want to hear and is more gross than any pickup artist book about talking to girls because it's so condescending and just makes guys who do it effeminate wusses
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on May 26, 2014, 07:52:50 PM
Using the term "females" can come off as creepy and weird in certain contexts, but if the biggest crime against my personhood is some internet man calling me a "female" then I'm having a pretty damn good life.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on May 26, 2014, 08:26:40 PM
The context that guy was using "female" in was pretty clear, though. I doubt he sidles up to women and whispers "Your biological configuration makes you an attractive female" in their ear.

It's goons with their simpleminded buzzwords looking to goon out and dogpile a dude.

At the rate they're going they'll whine so much about it that it won't even be allowable medical terminology.

Sex: M/FSTRONG BEAUTIFUL TRANSWOMYN
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Watcher on May 26, 2014, 09:21:14 PM
Someone should ask goons how they would attract a woman, since they seem to know so much about them.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 26, 2014, 09:37:56 PM
Using the term "females" can come off as creepy and weird in certain contexts, but if the biggest crime against my personhood is some internet man calling me a "female" then I'm having a pretty damn good life.

Who gives a shit if someone refers to women or men as females or males in third person. Its nothing but goons getting triggered over inconsequential bullshit again.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on May 26, 2014, 09:52:04 PM
My bf is/was a Marine and he says everyone is referred to as males or females so who really gives a shit about the word. I hate being referred to as "woman" since that connotation is like 40 and over and goons referring to 18/19 year olds as "woman" on the forums is the stupidest thing

Some E/N thread had an op with sentences like "this woman in my class" and I immediately though it was about an adult education course at a community college.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on May 26, 2014, 09:58:06 PM
My bf is/was a Marine and he says everyone is referred to as males or females so who really gives a shit about the word.
Well 120% of womyn get raped in the armed forces so that only makes sense.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on May 26, 2014, 10:19:00 PM


casually observing that a woman is attractive is the most efficient way to troll goons these days

it makes them SOOOOO ANGRY  :madgoon:

It's extra retarded when it's a woman in entertainment and a huge part of their job is looking good, so I'm sure they just hate knowing that random people think they look hot
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on May 27, 2014, 11:09:02 AM

Troon beauty pageant quarter-finalist, Damiya (pictured below) also joined the dogpile.

(http://i.imgur.com/7nrwqXP.jpg)

jesus christ it's going to kill us all

(http://i.imgur.com/5XlvoY8.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on May 27, 2014, 11:22:31 AM
Using the term "females" can come off as creepy and weird in certain contexts, but if the biggest crime against my personhood is some internet man calling me a "female" then I'm having a pretty damn good life.

Who gives a shit if someone refers to women or men as females or males in third person. Its nothing but goons getting triggered over inconsequential bullshit again.

Oh it's definitely goons freaking out over stupid shit that doesn't matter, I more than agree with you there, but if you were standing around with your bro talking about "dude, females are so HOT" then you would kind of sound kinda *beep boop FEMALE CREATURE*. It's just kind of weird and off putting outside of certain contexts. If I walked around referring to men as penis-havers or whatever it would be weird at the very least.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on May 27, 2014, 11:43:20 AM
yeah using 'female' is all about context and using it in the wrong context does make you sound like some beep boop aspie robot

"blah blah blah female gamers don't exist" versus "blah blah so those females were walking toward me and I shat my pants then said m'ladies"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on May 27, 2014, 01:38:31 PM
Troon beauty pageant quarter-finalist, Damiya (pictured below) also joined the dogpile.

(http://i.imgur.com/7nrwqXP.jpg)


Dudes got a catchers mitt for a face.

He was pretty good in The Mask though  :allears:

(http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002708001/41574845_Rocky_Dennis_xlarge.png)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on May 27, 2014, 05:04:13 PM
if you were standing around with your bro talking about "dude, females are so HOT" then you would kind of sound kinda *beep boop FEMALE CREATURE*. It's just kind of weird and off putting outside of certain contexts.

I think it's a pretty normal word and it's more like, weird and off-putting INSIDE of certain contexts

Most normal people can say "female" in a sentence and no one will notice or care, this is goons we're talking about.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on May 27, 2014, 08:49:20 PM
i think the issue here at its root is black and white worldview with a complete inability to suss nuance out of anything.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on May 27, 2014, 08:51:52 PM
The best part about Damiya was she described how she got a job at Riot and how special that is because she's a tranny in the cis white male game industry, and then like 2 sentences later casually mentioned the company had 3 gay guys and another tranny.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Birk on May 27, 2014, 09:04:37 PM
Troon beauty pageant quarter-finalist, Damiya (pictured below) also joined the dogpile.

(http://i.imgur.com/7nrwqXP.jpg)


Remember: the dude said the hot chick was hot.

Ah man. Robert Z'Dar is a tranny now?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on May 28, 2014, 05:30:56 PM
This person is mad that people are making fun of the front page movie reviews that focus on how Pixar movies are misogynistic because they made the female plane pink.

Quote from: Nucular Carmul" post="430221845
Haha yeah OP these SJWs are gettin outta control in this completely free and optional to read content that only happens once a week. I mean it's supposed to be a comedy website right? SA has always only ever had features that every single person ever loved, and had no detractors!

Quote from: Nucular Carmul" post="430255793
If you don't understand that Something Awful has been changing over the last five years then I don't know what to tell you. 4chan and reddit still exist if you want a safe space to not have to occasionally be reminded of social inequalities in between jokes. Besides, John Dyne is right, Awful Things For Sale is usually less funny than the fake scoring system or the excerpts of Montague Smythe and his mind sadventures, and it's a reposting of an existing blog to boot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on May 28, 2014, 06:10:02 PM
if there's one thing i still get irl mad about it's goons making sarcastic "oh yeah op  :rolleyes:" smug faggot posts

Quote
If you don't understand that Something Awful has been changing over the last five years then I don't know what to tell you. 4chan and reddit still exist if you want a safe space to not have to occasionally be reminded of social inequalities in between jokes. Besides, John Dyne is right, Awful Things For Sale is usually less funny than the fake scoring system or the excerpts of Montague Smythe and his mind sadventures, and it's a reposting of an existing blog to boot.

holy lmao fagmins please make the front page slogan "a site where you don't have to be reminded of social inequalities in between jokes"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 28, 2014, 06:25:36 PM
He probably has a degree in Critical Race Theory & Gender Studies with only too much time on his hands now.  :stewart:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on May 28, 2014, 06:30:11 PM
These are the reviews being talked about. I would like to mention again that none of this is done ironically. This is an actual movie review of the children's animated film Planes. Just read the bolded parts to get the jist of it.

http://www.somethingawful.com/current-movie-reviews/butler-jobs-conspiracy/4/

Quote
EXPECTATIONS: "From above the world of Disney's Cars," states the unimaginative tagline to Disney's Planes, their latest entry into the monstrously anthropomorphised vehicles canon. Why do these vehicles exist? Who built them? Why do they even have crop dusters? Do they eat? What happened to all the people? How does a film this ugly even get released? Who even likes Dane Cook? All these questions and more come immediately to mind every time I am invited to put my head through a Planes standee and pretend my face is an aeroplane cockpit.

REALITY: Children's entertainment has a long and noble history of anthropomorphising inanimate objects. It's an easy way to condition them toward two things: societal compliance and poetic thinking. When a dish can run away with a spoon, anything is possible, so long as we continue to live in a world where dishes and spoons exist. Bravery can be applied to a little toaster to teach our children that they should stand tall and be bold, so long as that boldness doesn't go so far as to say "Hey, let's not do any of this any more." How does this apply to Planes? Well, sometimes it's important to teach your children that societal constructs, such as the objectification of women and the natural inferiority of non-whites and non-Americans, are absolutely A-okay!

Dirt road to the... DANGER ZONE!
Dirt road to the... DANGER ZONE!

Dusty Crophopper (Dane Cook) is a sentient crop duster who dreams of being a racing plane. Okay, read that last sentence back to me. Yes, that sounds like the ravings of a madman. Okay, where were we? Dusty gets some training from a grounded Navy plane called Skipper (Stacy Keach), who is now a flight instructor (for sentient planes), and enters a worldwide plane racing championship, which he is improbably capable of winning. Oh, this sounds familiar to you? That's because it's the same plot as Turbo, but with aeroplanes instead of snails.
Cast your mind back a little way and you'll recall Joe hoping that Turbo would be secretly racist, just so he'd have something to talk about. Well, be careful what you wish for, Mr. Wade, because that's exactly what Planes is. This is a film that seems to have been designed with the sole purpose of putting me in a bad mood. It's political themes are offensive, its basic premise is terrifying given any scrutinisation and the whole thing is ultimately depressing and enraging. It certainly may make for an interesting conversation starter amongst film critic circles, but is it really something you want your children watching?

Let's begin in earnest by discussing the actual world of the planes, these terrifying homunculi exist on the planet Earth, the exact same planet upon which we currently live. They move around independently of human pilots and yet they continue to perform whatever task it is that they were designed for. They intake fuel directly to their tanks and yet they also ingest it orally, presumably into some stomach. Their mouths have teeth and tongues. In one scene, two planes visit the Taj Mahal, now overrun by sentient vehicles. Cars drive along its walls, taking in the sights for themselves, no longer restricted to the act of transiting their human owners to tourist destinations and then sleeping silently in the car park until it is time to leave.

The planes themselves somehow remained in their service roles, fit only for carrying out the tasks for which they are designed. Dusty, for example, is a crop duster whose crops are presumably harvested to make some kind of fuel. Plant life thrives in abundance, but not one living animal remains. I think it's pretty clear what happened here: we humans, in our infinite wisdom, have built this world for our own future generations, then we somehow gave sentience to our vehicles and they ate us all. That's the only backstory I can glean from what is implied. The cars are free without their human masters, the planes are restricted to their specific jobs and schedules and the fork-lift trucks are essentially the slaves, living only to appease their new masters.

In spite of the lack of humans, there still exist many human ideas and constructs in the new Earth. Obviously this class-division is only the beginning. The planes have managed to take on all the most stereotypical traits of their respective nationalities. Why do they have nationalities? Wouldn't sentient flying machines live in a world without borders? Dusty meets a menagerie of various stereotypes, chiefly a Mexican who wears a cape and mask and sings with a mariachi band. The Mexican plane, who we will refer to only as the Mexican plane for he has no identity beyond that, falls in love with a French Canadian ladyplane. Why do planes have gender? I have no idea, they presumably do not reproduce sexually. In fact, they don't seem to reproduce at all, they could well be the last and only of their kind, with no knowledge of how to make more planes. Dusty's dream of freedom is not just that of the average middle-class, stuck-in-a-rut Joe Everybody, but the death cry of an entire planet. Are you having fun yet, kids?

The female planes are apparently designed by someone who has no idea what a female plane would look like. The idea of introducing gendered identities to normally non-gendered objects so often treats the familiar as inherently masculine. Female planes are painted hot pink and granted the enlarged, fluttery eyelashes so often used to distinguish women from men in lazily drawn cartoons. "Look at that propellor," declares Dusty and he gets a look at one of the ladyplanes' rear end. In one scene, the film even eroticises the tilting of wingflaps for a disturbingly long time. You could argue that it is a joke. I would argue that it enforces the idea of objectifying women to all the five-year-old boys in the audience by applying it to literal objects who have gender but no sex. Gotta start them off early, after all.

In a film so concerned with class division, racial stereotypes and gender-inequality, it seems odd that the heavy-handed "moral" of the story would be that Dusty's success is an inspiration to all the little guys who were designed to be less but who can learn to try to become more somehow. It's like the persistent right-wing (ha) argument that minorities already have equality and that by insisting that they do not, these groups are merely seeking to gain an upper hand. The belief is that these people are naturally unequal and can only be considered equal in legal terms, because the truth as they see it is that anyone who is not society's favourite is only in a marginalised position because they can never aspire to truly be more than they are allowed to be.

Racism   0/10
Sexism   0/10
Classism   0/10
Horror   0/10
Dane Cook   0/10
Overall   0/50

MINORITY REPORT: The backstory you describe is a scenario more terrifying, more revolting, and more unknowably horrible than any Lovecraft story I've ever read. This is the film I've been dreading we'd see all year, and I have to pat you on the back for taking it like a champ. Welcome to the club, Professor. - Joseph "Jay Dub" Wade
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Harry D Greek on May 28, 2014, 06:32:09 PM
if there's one thing i still get irl mad about it's goons making sarcastic "oh yeah op  :rolleyes:" smug faggot posts

Quote
If you don't understand that Something Awful has been changing over the last five years then I don't know what to tell you. 4chan and reddit still exist if you want a safe space to not have to occasionally be reminded of social inequalities in between jokes. Besides, John Dyne is right, Awful Things For Sale is usually less funny than the fake scoring system or the excerpts of Montague Smythe and his mind sadventures, and it's a reposting of an existing blog to boot.


holy lmao fagmins please make the front page slogan "a site where you don't have to be reminded of social inequalities in between jokes"

Yeah, that would make a good one, include the "safe space" part too
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on May 28, 2014, 08:17:13 PM
those racism/sexism scores are completely earnest arent they
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on May 29, 2014, 01:19:21 AM
racism to goons = man puts on an italian accent as a VA for a cartoon bugatti.

honourable mention:

the scene in toy story 3 where buzz lightyear's spanish edition does a dance to a spanish guitar around jessie.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on May 29, 2014, 01:27:26 AM
These are the reviews being talked about. I would like to mention again that none of this is done ironically. This is an actual movie review of the children's animated film Planes. Just read the bolded parts to get the jist of it.

http://www.somethingawful.com/current-movie-reviews/butler-jobs-conspiracy/4/

Quote
EXPECTATIONS: "From above the world of Disney's Cars," states the unimaginative tagline to Disney's Planes, their latest entry into the monstrously anthropomorphised vehicles canon. Why do these vehicles exist? Who built them? Why do they even have crop dusters? Do they eat? What happened to all the people? How does a film this ugly even get released? Who even likes Dane Cook? All these questions and more come immediately to mind every time I am invited to put my head through a Planes standee and pretend my face is an aeroplane cockpit.

REALITY: Children's entertainment has a long and noble history of anthropomorphising inanimate objects. It's an easy way to condition them toward two things: societal compliance and poetic thinking. When a dish can run away with a spoon, anything is possible, so long as we continue to live in a world where dishes and spoons exist. Bravery can be applied to a little toaster to teach our children that they should stand tall and be bold, so long as that boldness doesn't go so far as to say "Hey, let's not do any of this any more." How does this apply to Planes? Well, sometimes it's important to teach your children that societal constructs, such as the objectification of women and the natural inferiority of non-whites and non-Americans, are absolutely A-okay!

Dirt road to the... DANGER ZONE!
Dirt road to the... DANGER ZONE!

Dusty Crophopper (Dane Cook) is a sentient crop duster who dreams of being a racing plane. Okay, read that last sentence back to me. Yes, that sounds like the ravings of a madman. Okay, where were we? Dusty gets some training from a grounded Navy plane called Skipper (Stacy Keach), who is now a flight instructor (for sentient planes), and enters a worldwide plane racing championship, which he is improbably capable of winning. Oh, this sounds familiar to you? That's because it's the same plot as Turbo, but with aeroplanes instead of snails.
Cast your mind back a little way and you'll recall Joe hoping that Turbo would be secretly racist, just so he'd have something to talk about. Well, be careful what you wish for, Mr. Wade, because that's exactly what Planes is. This is a film that seems to have been designed with the sole purpose of putting me in a bad mood. It's political themes are offensive, its basic premise is terrifying given any scrutinisation and the whole thing is ultimately depressing and enraging. It certainly may make for an interesting conversation starter amongst film critic circles, but is it really something you want your children watching?

Let's begin in earnest by discussing the actual world of the planes, these terrifying homunculi exist on the planet Earth, the exact same planet upon which we currently live. They move around independently of human pilots and yet they continue to perform whatever task it is that they were designed for. They intake fuel directly to their tanks and yet they also ingest it orally, presumably into some stomach. Their mouths have teeth and tongues. In one scene, two planes visit the Taj Mahal, now overrun by sentient vehicles. Cars drive along its walls, taking in the sights for themselves, no longer restricted to the act of transiting their human owners to tourist destinations and then sleeping silently in the car park until it is time to leave.

The planes themselves somehow remained in their service roles, fit only for carrying out the tasks for which they are designed. Dusty, for example, is a crop duster whose crops are presumably harvested to make some kind of fuel. Plant life thrives in abundance, but not one living animal remains. I think it's pretty clear what happened here: we humans, in our infinite wisdom, have built this world for our own future generations, then we somehow gave sentience to our vehicles and they ate us all. That's the only backstory I can glean from what is implied. The cars are free without their human masters, the planes are restricted to their specific jobs and schedules and the fork-lift trucks are essentially the slaves, living only to appease their new masters.

In spite of the lack of humans, there still exist many human ideas and constructs in the new Earth. Obviously this class-division is only the beginning. The planes have managed to take on all the most stereotypical traits of their respective nationalities. Why do they have nationalities? Wouldn't sentient flying machines live in a world without borders? Dusty meets a menagerie of various stereotypes, chiefly a Mexican who wears a cape and mask and sings with a mariachi band. The Mexican plane, who we will refer to only as the Mexican plane for he has no identity beyond that, falls in love with a French Canadian ladyplane. Why do planes have gender? I have no idea, they presumably do not reproduce sexually. In fact, they don't seem to reproduce at all, they could well be the last and only of their kind, with no knowledge of how to make more planes. Dusty's dream of freedom is not just that of the average middle-class, stuck-in-a-rut Joe Everybody, but the death cry of an entire planet. Are you having fun yet, kids?

The female planes are apparently designed by someone who has no idea what a female plane would look like. The idea of introducing gendered identities to normally non-gendered objects so often treats the familiar as inherently masculine. Female planes are painted hot pink and granted the enlarged, fluttery eyelashes so often used to distinguish women from men in lazily drawn cartoons. "Look at that propellor," declares Dusty and he gets a look at one of the ladyplanes' rear end. In one scene, the film even eroticises the tilting of wingflaps for a disturbingly long time. You could argue that it is a joke. I would argue that it enforces the idea of objectifying women to all the five-year-old boys in the audience by applying it to literal objects who have gender but no sex. Gotta start them off early, after all.

In a film so concerned with class division, racial stereotypes and gender-inequality, it seems odd that the heavy-handed "moral" of the story would be that Dusty's success is an inspiration to all the little guys who were designed to be less but who can learn to try to become more somehow. It's like the persistent right-wing (ha) argument that minorities already have equality and that by insisting that they do not, these groups are merely seeking to gain an upper hand. The belief is that these people are naturally unequal and can only be considered equal in legal terms, because the truth as they see it is that anyone who is not society's favourite is only in a marginalised position because they can never aspire to truly be more than they are allowed to be.

Racism   0/10
Sexism   0/10
Classism   0/10
Horror   0/10
Dane Cook   0/10
Overall   0/50

MINORITY REPORT: The backstory you describe is a scenario more terrifying, more revolting, and more unknowably horrible than any Lovecraft story I've ever read. This is the film I've been dreading we'd see all year, and I have to pat you on the back for taking it like a champ. Welcome to the club, Professor. - Joseph "Jay Dub" Wade

Wonder how much in debt this goon is in for their worthless degree.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on May 29, 2014, 11:35:53 AM
Quote
The female planes are apparently designed by someone who has no idea what a female plane would look like.

 :jesse:
lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Fuck Sister, MAKE BANK on May 29, 2014, 01:23:40 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

For their own good they should be shot.

They shoot horses, don't they?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: food desert on May 29, 2014, 01:26:52 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

No, they can't merely enjoy entertainment for the pure pleasure of being entertained anymore.

Even if their perfect vision for entertainment is presented to them, they mere applaud it for ticking all the correct boxes instead of enjoying it for being good.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Martin Looter King on May 29, 2014, 01:37:09 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

For their own good they should be shot.

They shoot horses, don't they?

Everything is zero-sum so enjoyment means someone has to suffer and that is UNFAIR.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: PUSSY CANCER on May 29, 2014, 01:43:34 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

For their own good they should be shot.

They shoot horses, don't they?

The only thing that brings them joy is their own indignation
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on May 29, 2014, 06:29:55 PM
https://twitter.com/ICarsia

Quote
Filmmaker, amateur critical theorist, misanthrope, Center-left moderate social libertarian

 :madgoon: HE'S A LIBERTARTIAN!!!! :confurage:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on May 29, 2014, 07:34:31 PM
https://twitter.com/ICarsia

Quote
Filmmaker, amateur critical theorist, misanthrope, Center-left moderate social libertarian

 :madgoon: HE'S A LIBERTARTIAN!!!! :confurage:

Social libertarian, one of the people that go "Oh yeah, sure, everybody can just do whatever they want as long as it doesn't harm me personally because what could possibly go wrong?"
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on May 29, 2014, 08:00:51 PM
I would like to point out that the pilot who holds the record for World's fastest prop driven airplane is a crop duster pilot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on May 29, 2014, 08:02:06 PM
I would like to point out that the pilot who holds the record for World's fastest prop driven airplane is a crop duster pilot.

Crop dusters are cool.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Diamond Dallas Page on May 29, 2014, 09:46:54 PM
those racism/sexism scores are completely earnest arent they

Nobody setting out to write a funny movie review could come up with those lines as jokes.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on May 30, 2014, 02:12:58 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/eAujjT2.jpg)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on June 01, 2014, 11:58:19 PM
Game of thrones had another solid gorey moment (here (http://youtu.be/Wdys79NpMLM) spoiler, obviously that's not the real music) and the cry brigade is already showing it's head
Quote
Can't recall TV ever bringing on a wave of actual nausea in me before.
Quote
Yeah, I uh...I kind of wish I hadn't of watched that bit.
Quote
Seriously, did anyone else think that death scene was going too far? Like part of me felt like I shouldn't have watched it. I know GOT's Universe is all about cruelty and stuff but seriously, I felt like they went too far with how they showed it. I'm still trying to process the damn thing.
Quote
It's such a jump in terms of violent character deaths. In Season One, they cut away at the moment of Ned Stark's beheading to a flock of birds, and the whole thing had this tone that, while shocking, was also subdued.

Season Three, with the Red Wedding, the deaths were (mostly) pretty quick and still had this kind of subdued sense (which is weird to say because one doesn't normally call stabbing a pregnant woman "subdued"). I remember being surprised because in the book it's a lot more brutal.

Then in season four they have Joffrey choke to death and have the last shot on his blue, distorted face, and then have Oberyn screaming in horror and pain while we see the Mountain gouge his eyes in, smash his head against the ground, and then a shot of his horrifically brutalized face and brain matter sprayed across the stone.

The deaths this season feel like they've gotten a lot closer to fucking snuff films on the spectrum of visual deaths. I don't think I like that very much.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on June 02, 2014, 12:16:59 AM
At the very least it shows goons still have a sense or morality and shame. Surprised someone's not hopping in the thread crying bigotry and goreshaming  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: tranny hatefucker on June 02, 2014, 12:26:01 AM
Hahaha game of thrones is getting so retardedly grimdark  :tuss:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on June 02, 2014, 12:50:13 AM
Hahaha game of thrones is getting so retardedly grimdark  :tuss:

Is the 4th season the best one yet so far? I'm waiting to binge watch it all once it finishes.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on June 02, 2014, 02:47:41 AM
Hahaha game of thrones is getting so retardedly grimdark  :tuss:

Is the 4th season the best one yet so far? I'm waiting to binge watch it all once it finishes.

its deffo the most watchable so far
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 03, 2014, 08:27:52 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

No, they can't merely enjoy entertainment for the pure pleasure of being entertained anymore.

Even if their perfect vision for entertainment is presented to them, they mere applaud it for ticking all the correct boxes instead of enjoying it for being good.

I think its because they feel guilty about how much leisure time they have.  They feel ashamed that they have no job, no girlfriend, no real purpose to their lives.  Thus whenever they waste time watching movies and playing videogames, they feel intense shame and thus they try and manufacture fake outrage in order to feel like they are doing something more important.  See, I'm RAISING AWARENESS about important issues on the internet.  So in a way, I'm similar to a guy with a job, paying taxes, and raising children.  I'm not wasting my life!  I am important too!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on June 03, 2014, 08:31:21 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

No, they can't merely enjoy entertainment for the pure pleasure of being entertained anymore.

Even if their perfect vision for entertainment is presented to them, they mere applaud it for ticking all the correct boxes instead of enjoying it for being good.

I think its because they feel guilty about how much leisure time they have.  They feel ashamed that they have no job, no girlfriend, no real purpose to their lives.  Thus whenever they waste time watching movies and playing videogames, they feel intense shame and thus they try and manufacture fake outrage in order to feel like they are doing something more important.  See, I'm RAISING AWARENESS about important issues on the internet.  So in a way, I'm similar to a guy with a job, paying taxes, and raising children.  I'm not wasting my life!  I am important too!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Rape Artist on June 03, 2014, 08:43:37 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

No, they can't merely enjoy entertainment for the pure pleasure of being entertained anymore.

Even if their perfect vision for entertainment is presented to them, they mere applaud it for ticking all the correct boxes instead of enjoying it for being good.

I think its because they feel guilty about how much leisure time they have.  They feel ashamed that they have no job, no girlfriend, no real purpose to their lives.  Thus whenever they waste time watching movies and playing videogames, they feel intense shame and thus they try and manufacture fake outrage in order to feel like they are doing something more important.  See, I'm RAISING AWARENESS about important issues on the internet.  So in a way, I'm similar to a guy with a job, paying taxes, and raising children.  I'm not wasting my life!  I am important too!

quoting for signal boost
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on June 03, 2014, 09:05:21 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

No, they can't merely enjoy entertainment for the pure pleasure of being entertained anymore.

Even if their perfect vision for entertainment is presented to them, they mere applaud it for ticking all the correct boxes instead of enjoying it for being good.

I think its because they feel guilty about how much leisure time they have.  They feel ashamed that they have no job, no girlfriend, no real purpose to their lives.  Thus whenever they waste time watching movies and playing videogames, they feel intense shame and thus they try and manufacture fake outrage in order to feel like they are doing something more important.  See, I'm RAISING AWARENESS about important issues on the internet.  So in a way, I'm similar to a guy with a job, paying taxes, and raising children.  I'm not wasting my life!  I am important too!

Youth in the 60's did their thing, protesting, marching and manning the barrikades,
Why can't the 00's pull off the same thing, on the internet?

It's mockery and sad realization at the same time.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on June 03, 2014, 09:51:26 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

No, they can't merely enjoy entertainment for the pure pleasure of being entertained anymore.

Even if their perfect vision for entertainment is presented to them, they mere applaud it for ticking all the correct boxes instead of enjoying it for being good.



I think its because they feel guilty about how much leisure time they have.  They feel ashamed that they have no job, no girlfriend, no real purpose to their lives.  Thus whenever they waste time watching movies and playing videogames, they feel intense shame and thus they try and manufacture fake outrage in order to feel like they are doing something more important.  See, I'm RAISING AWARENESS about important issues on the internet.  So in a way, I'm similar to a guy with a job, paying taxes, and raising children.  I'm not wasting my life!  I am important too!
with this did my outreach activity for the day
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Merrypfeifengesicht on June 03, 2014, 09:55:57 PM
Can goons enjoy anything anymore? Are they even capable of enjoying anything that doesn't come through Steam? Even then, they bitch and moan about gender rolls in games and "this character would be better if he was gay" and so forth. I really feel sorry for these poor sods at this point. They are mentally damaged to an almost unsalvageable degree.

No, they can't merely enjoy entertainment for the pure pleasure of being entertained anymore.

Even if their perfect vision for entertainment is presented to them, they mere applaud it for ticking all the correct boxes instead of enjoying it for being good.

I think its because they feel guilty about how much leisure time they have.  They feel ashamed that they have no job, no girlfriend, no real purpose to their lives.  Thus whenever they waste time watching movies and playing videogames, they feel intense shame and thus they try and manufacture fake outrage in order to feel like they are doing something more important.  See, I'm RAISING AWARENESS about important issues on the internet.  So in a way, I'm similar to a guy with a job, paying taxes, and raising children.  I'm not wasting my life!  I am important too!

#YesAllINCELs
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on June 03, 2014, 10:03:01 PM
It would be easy to unironically agree with emotional service animal's post if these people made the next step and:

1. Raised awareness in real life, whether by raising awareness on the streets, or by bringing it up in a local university's feminist group meetings, for example.

2. Assembled the like-minded and took to Hollywood/wherever applicable/ their city hall/local university and picketed, or made their voices in public space heard.

3. Write to civil leaders.

ANYTHING, even if it doesn't take off too far, to bring their beliefs and shit into the modern, tangible real world. I'd genuinely respect the effort and dedication.

Even pathetic incels will take a plane and a bus to Odessa to take a woman out on a date. Goons won't do shit, even when given all the time and money (of their parents) in the world.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 03, 2014, 10:13:56 PM
It would be easy to unironically agree with emotional service animal's post if these people made the next step and:

1. Raised awareness in real life, whether by raising awareness on the streets, or by bringing it up in a local university's feminist group meetings, for example.

2. Assembled the like-minded and took to Hollywood/wherever applicable/ their city hall/local university and picketed, or made their voices in public space heard.

3. Write to civil leaders.

ANYTHING, even if it doesn't take off too far, to bring their beliefs and shit into the modern, tangible real world. I'd genuinely respect the effort and dedication.

Even pathetic incels will take a plane and a bus to Odessa to take a woman out on a date. Goons won't do shit, even when given all the time and money (of their parents) in the world.

"I want to do something important.  Something that matters!  Something that justifies my existence on this planet and proves I'm not just a miserable leech on society.  I want the world to be a better place because of my existence on this earth.  I want to feel like I matter!  The problem though, is that under no circumstances do I want to:  A) burn any calories what so ever,  B)  Spend even 1 cent of my own money,  C)  interact with human beings in the real world,  D) leave my own bedroom.

I know!  I'll RAISE AWARENESS of social issues on the internet!!!!  What a perfect solution!"
 :say:
 :goon:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on June 06, 2014, 12:37:23 AM
holy shitballs, the thread for Louie right now.  fuckin lol.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Trump is the New Norma on June 06, 2014, 02:22:31 AM
Goons who have nothing better to do than to be outraged by the latest pop-culture "offensive" moment.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on June 11, 2014, 10:31:29 PM
Quote from: Pomp" post="430897878
Louie [CK]'s real life transformation from 40 year old bitter, jaded redditor to a 50 year old bitter, jaded feminist is pretty great, so far.

Oh my God.

Quote from: PostNouveau" post="430895325
Nah, if you listen to his Opie & Anthony appearances on youtube, he drops into that whole "political correctness is ruining society" bullshit a lot. Also, basically every time they talk about a woman, Louis will call her a cunt. Some of that might be him playing to Opie & Anthony's huge audience of dirtbags though.

Yeah you see Louis ck is a progressive feminist at heart and only said those things to his radio host friends in conversation to appease those reddity mouth breathers you see, he doesn't reaaaaaallllly believe what he says outside of his fictional television show. Unbelievable how goons will come up with excuses if something doesn't fit their eorld view.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Al Roker Shart on June 11, 2014, 10:58:53 PM
I'm curious why this is a thing though. Like....yeah, why?? Bragging and arguing on the internet are the gayest fucking things, I get it. I think most of us do.

But if I tell people on the internet I'm an astrophysicist, that drives a ferrari and has Jessica Alba as my side piece? Thats all shit actually worth bragging about. (not that any of it is true)

If I share with my fellow possessors of $10 that I was disgusted, repulsed and shaken by a show about tits, ass and dragons? That just aint a thing to write home about.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Launchpad McQuack on June 17, 2014, 12:02:24 PM
Quote from: effectual" post="431063197
Saw another one in my dvd's: Freddy Got Fingered.

And my mom was just reminding me to get my dad a fathers day gift and I said screw that, fuck his republican votes that hurt people.  I'll get him some cheap trinket for his bday but that's it.  Then we got into politics and I inferred she was a "truth in the middle" type so I walked away.  Even if you don't vote for evil, that doesn't mean you aren't voting against it.  I'll be glad when old people keel over.

Quote from: effectual" post="431063587
Why shoud I care how well they treat me if they turn around and vote for bigots who want to fuck over unions and minorities?  My happiness isnt more important than others.

Quote from: effectual" post="431064019
I'm even left of commie, and I've been burdened with white guilt since before the internet existed to invent the term :(

This person also posts in SAS but only talks about SJW issues in it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 17, 2014, 12:07:07 PM
"republican votes that hurt people"

New user name spotted  :allears:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: VFW on June 17, 2014, 12:09:41 PM
lol trinket. What a condescending piece of commie shit that twink is. Talking about its father like the dad is some sort of villain for not voting in the Faggot Alliance Party (fap)
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: niggerstomper on June 17, 2014, 01:15:44 PM
id like a word with that guy
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on June 17, 2014, 01:21:25 PM
Also lol at "burdened by wnite guilt since before the internet existed"...so basically he's in his 40s and still raging against daddy.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: unprivsplain on June 17, 2014, 01:42:10 PM
Also lol at "burdened by wnite guilt since before the internet existed"...so basically he's in his 40s and still raging against daddy.
Could have been one of those kids that cry for a week when they're told true sun will die in however many billion years.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on June 17, 2014, 05:38:53 PM
Let me guess: those evil murderers unfairly known as "his parents" still finance most or all of his life.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on June 17, 2014, 11:26:45 PM
Let me guess: those evil murderers unfairly known as "his parents" still finance most or all of his life.


lol, of COURSE.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on June 20, 2014, 11:08:32 AM
Quote from: K. Waste" post="431273856
Any number of characters who were specifically written for comedic shorts wouldn't work well in a feature setting. There's nothing in particular about either Popeye or Betty Boop that implicitly lends itself to translate from the former to the latter. Coy sex appeal and beating the shit out of people are just two halves of the same coin, and both characters are unique products of the times in which they were conceived that make no logical sense in a modern setting, except as nostalgia or irony.

The reason Popeye has survived the tide of cultural history and Betty Boop hasn't isn't because of Betty. It's because of sexism.

 :madgoon: BETTY BOOP ISN'T AS RELEVANT AS POPEYE BECAUSE PATRIARCHY!!!! :ultlibrage:

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on June 20, 2014, 11:20:39 AM
Lol betty sings and dances, popeye does this and fucking fights people
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on June 20, 2014, 11:27:41 AM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on June 20, 2014, 11:31:26 AM
Goons triggered by Popeye's rampant vegetable-eating habit.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on June 20, 2014, 12:01:00 PM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.

Goons were melting down over this:
http://i.imgur.com/spdrqWs.jpg

Popeye is public domain now as well.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on June 20, 2014, 01:14:13 PM
Well lets see...I've got some purses and sandals in my store right now with Betty Boop on them. Number of Popeye items? Zero.
:adam:,
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Death Camp for Cutie on June 20, 2014, 01:21:50 PM
I'm surprised there hasn't been a big Boop resurgence by cows because she's 'full figured'
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: PUSSY CANCER on June 20, 2014, 01:34:48 PM
Goons triggered by Popeye's rampant vegetable-eating habit.

If it ain't bacon, I'm triggard!
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: White Power Superhero on June 20, 2014, 01:52:25 PM
Betty Boop merchandise is everywhere, what the fuck is that sperglord actually talking about? Ask young girls who Betty is and they either know who she is or can point out her image on all the merchandise she's on, but ask any boys OR girls who Popeye is and they'd probably turn up a fucking blank. Who actually looks at irrelevant 30s cartoons and screams sexism, holy shit.

Is Felix the Cat somehow a transphobic trigger fest to these wastes of oxygen?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Black Gardener on June 20, 2014, 02:15:42 PM
Goons triggered by Popeye's rampant vegetable-eating habit.

If it ain't bacon, I'm triggard!

A very triggardly statement.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Dr. Hatchet-Wound on June 20, 2014, 02:53:38 PM
Is Felix the Cat somehow a transphobic trigger fest to these wastes of oxygen?

Just wait until they discover the literal rapist that is Pepe le Pew.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Linebacker in a Dress on June 20, 2014, 11:15:58 PM
Is Felix the Cat somehow a transphobic trigger fest to these wastes of oxygen?

Just wait until they discover the literal rapist that is Pepe le Pew.

Pepe is the definition of problematic. He's French, and therefore European and therefore the goon ideal of superiority.

OTOH, rape.

Hold on, I have a goony breakdown of the subject right here.

 :888:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: EaglesDick on June 20, 2014, 11:44:19 PM
nm
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on June 23, 2014, 11:46:48 AM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.

Goons were melting down over this:
http://i.imgur.com/spdrqWs.jpg

Popeye is public domain now as well.

looks like perfectly normal rough sex to me  :jesse:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Aran on June 23, 2014, 12:56:24 PM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.

Goons were melting down over this:
http://i.imgur.com/spdrqWs.jpg

Popeye is public domain now as well.

looks like perfectly normal rough sex to me  :jesse:

Aside from the part where she called for help and doesn't want it, I guess.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 23, 2014, 01:08:43 PM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.

Goons were melting down over this:
http://i.imgur.com/spdrqWs.jpg

Popeye is public domain now as well.

looks like perfectly normal rough sex to me  :jesse:

Don't kinkshame!!! How dare you call my sexual turn ons "rape".   :christina:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on June 23, 2014, 04:12:55 PM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.

Goons were melting down over this:
http://i.imgur.com/spdrqWs.jpg

Popeye is public domain now as well.

looks like perfectly normal rough sex to me  :jesse:

Aside from the part where she called for help and doesn't want it, I guess.

Hey, if she didn't want it she would have used the safe word.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on June 23, 2014, 06:54:17 PM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.

Goons were melting down over this:
http://i.imgur.com/spdrqWs.jpg

Popeye is public domain now as well.

looks like perfectly normal rough sex to me  :jesse:

Aside from the part where she called for help and doesn't want it, I guess.

I think she just wanted Popeye to join in.  It's ambiguous at best.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: PUSSY CANCER on June 23, 2014, 07:07:58 PM
she was informing popeye he was about to get cucked  :unparsons:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Hashtag Activist on June 23, 2014, 10:02:34 PM
Wow.  Not a single trans person or POC in that comic strip?  This very troubling and I think we need to signal boost this issue.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: pitstain on June 23, 2014, 10:27:01 PM
I always thought it was pathetic how people would be probated for calling a female character a bitch. The most famous being the Breaking Bad wife. Guess who started that crusade btw? lol
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Legal Swedish Rape Gang on June 23, 2014, 11:00:29 PM
I always thought it was pathetic how people would be probated for calling a female character a bitch. The most famous being the Breaking Bad wife. Guess who started that crusade btw? lol

Brooklyn Bruiser?
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on June 24, 2014, 01:17:03 AM
Wow.  Not a single trans person or POC in that comic strip?  This very troubling and I think we need to signal boost this issue.

Yeah, its definitely problematic.

I always thought it was pathetic how people would be probated for calling a female character a bitch. The most famous being the Breaking Bad wife. Guess who started that crusade btw? lol

It wasn't one person who started vehemently defending Skyler it was internet feminists, SJWs, and virgins as a whole that just found another opportunity to call anyone sexists for not liking an insufferable female character on a fucking TV show.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 24, 2014, 01:36:52 AM
Pretty sure the actress that played Skyler actually called her character a "bitch" several times in interviews.

That was her character.  She was playing the role of "a bitch" (among other things).  This is according to THE ACTRESS WHO FUCKING PLAYED THE CHARACTER
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on June 24, 2014, 01:50:12 AM
Pretty sure the actress that played Skyler actually called her character a "bitch" several times in interviews.

That was her character.  She was playing the role of "a bitch" (among other things).  This is according to THE ACTRESS WHO FUCKING PLAYED THE CHARACTER

(Discalimer!!!: Some Breaking Bad spoilers in this post so if you haven't seen the show stop reading this post now.)

I remember reading somewhere that the Skyler character was going to die in the second half of season 5 along with Walter & Hank due to Skyler becoming actively involved in Walter's (with Walt Jr. going to live with Marie) crimes but eventually Gilligan & the producers decided against it due to fears of scathing reviews/backlash from critics/fans screaming sexism—which would've resulted in Breaking Bad's 5th season loosing its 100% critical positive reception (And possibly affecting the overall perception of the show). This isn't even mentioning the fact that Gilligan & co "acknowledged" the overwhelming negative reception the Skyler character has been receiving at least two years prior. The Shows creators even said from the start that all the characters who began to "Break Bad" in the show wouldn't have positive endings.

Long story short, they decided to keep her alive because they were scared of a  :ultlibrage: backlash. All is faggot.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: SooperPooper on June 24, 2014, 10:00:15 AM


I'm straining to remember when I've seen or heard anything of either Popeye or Betty Boop.

Goons were melting down over this:
http://i.imgur.com/spdrqWs.jpg

Popeye is public domain now as well.

looks like perfectly normal rough sex to me  :jesse:

Aside from the part where she called for help and doesn't want it, I guess.

I think she just wanted Popeye to join in.  It's ambiguous at best.

Someone needs to edit out the bottom half and have Popeye returning Olive shooting Bluto full of holes with her CCW and then stabbing flagpole flying an american flag through his head.  They'll prob be equally offended.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on June 24, 2014, 12:02:24 PM
I always thought it was pathetic how people would be probated for calling a female character a bitch. The most famous being the Breaking Bad wife. Guess who started that crusade btw? lol

I don't know when it began, but goons seems to have been Pavlov'd into replacing female with woman/women without thinking about how it affects the context of what they're writing. Maybe it's not that prevalent(don't read many threads there), but I've been seeing things like people writing "the women characters" while also mentioning "the male characters" in the same sentence.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Gender Swapped Dinosaur on June 24, 2014, 12:23:55 PM

Forget TVIV, internet discussion of television as a whole is a giant den of absolute faggotry. Take this 888 about the casting of a white guy as camel jockey in that new FX show, Tyrant:

http://www.hitfix.com/the-fien-print/why-it-matters-that-fxs-tyrant-didnt-cast-a-middle-eastern-actor-in-its-lead-role
 (http://www.hitfix.com/the-fien-print/why-it-matters-that-fxs-tyrant-didnt-cast-a-middle-eastern-actor-in-its-lead-role)

Quote
Other than fact-based based projects about actual, verifiable white people, it is never incumbent upon a film or TV show to "cast white," because if you don't cast a white guy in one project, you can safely guarantee that the next project with a potentially Caucasian lead will be right around the corner and Hollywood is far more committed to the quest for square-jawed white guys than geologists are to finding petroleum or astronomers are to finding intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.

Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Man Hands on June 24, 2014, 12:40:33 PM
neat posted this in the strug. And I really wish SA were up so I could laugh and quote the outrage they surely can't wait to spew in TVIV.

http://www.salon.com/2014/06/23/gary_oldmans_shocking_p_c_rant_on_12_years_a_slave_and_anti_semitism_mel_gibson_is_in_a_town_thats_run_by_jews/#comments

Quote
Gary Oldman has broken his silence on political correctness — and the actor has a great deal of sympathy with Mel Gibson.

In an interview with Playboy (picked up by the Daily Mail), Oldman, promoting “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes,” spoke out about Gibson’s seeming exile from Hollywood following a series of rants caught on tape, including one in which he claimed “Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” Oldman sees both sides of the issue:

“Mel Gibson is in a town that’s run by Jews, and he said the wrong thing because he’s actually bitten the hand that I guess has fed him – and doesn’t need to feed him anymore because he’s got enough dough.

“He’s like an outcast, a leper, you know?

“But some Jewish guy in his office somewhere hasn’t turned and said, “That f—ing kraut” or “F— those Germans,” whatever it is? We all hide and try to be so politically correct. That’s what gets me.”

Oldman also defended Alec Baldwin’s use of homophobic language, an issue that hasn’t quite cost Baldwin his career but has been hotly contested since last fall: “Alec calling someone an F-A-G in the street while he’s pissed off coming out of his building because they won’t leave him alone. I don’t blame him. So they persecute.”

Who “they” are — Hollywood liberals? — does not quite get revealed in the excerpts quoted by the Daily Mail — the interview is not yet online in full. But Oldman, who has never won an Oscar despite one nomination in 2012, takes further objection to academy voting — “‘At the Oscars, if you didn’t vote for ’12 Years a Slave’ you were a racist” — and to how liberal comedians are able to speak freely while he’s, apparently, censored.

“Well, if I called Nancy Pelosi a c— — and I’ll go one better, a f—ing useless c— — I can’t really say that.”

He’s speaking hypothetically, you see!

“Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” comes out July 11.

(http://i.imgur.com/1EUFlzf.gif)
of these commenters are fags.

Quote
Wow I used to like him...what a horrible racist human being! It doesn't mean we are political correct because we actually don't have those thoughts. He is 'PC' because apparently he hates Jews and women. Can the British imperialists please die off already.

Quote
Ah, another bitter old white conservative male opens his mouth and spews hate as usual.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: pitstain on June 24, 2014, 01:23:06 PM
"spewing hate" = giving your opposing opinion
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: DILDO FRICTION on June 24, 2014, 01:57:17 PM
seriously though, 12 years a slave is just not a very good film
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: VFW on June 24, 2014, 01:59:25 PM
seriously though, 12 years a slave is just not a very good film

The piss fetishists love it. That's probably half of Heebywood
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: LITERALLY A RAPIST on June 24, 2014, 02:07:01 PM
seriously though, 12 years a slave is just not a very good film

i have a billion dollar idea i've been kicking around for a movie that would make it guaranteed to win an academy award/oscar/emmy/every award ever if it got a couple of big name actors attached:

SETTING: THE DEEP SOUTH, USA
TIME: SLAVERY DAYS

SYNOPSIS: ROBERT SHERMAN is the cruel owner of a plantation who regularly abuses his slaves and rapes women. He has several fat spoiled white daughters who tease the slaves and make fun of them, and the pride of his loins is his thin and sensitive-looking son (played by the kid from Juno or shea labeouf) who he wants to someday become a man and bigot like himself. His son is secretly gay (reads a lot of poetry), and carries on a romance with a black slave. The climax of the movie involves Robert Sherman walking in on his son in the midst of a receiving anal sex from the black slave. his father is outraged that his son is a fag, and his son succumbs to pressure and screams that he was being raped. the slave is sentenced to death, but in the end the son comes through and sends him away on the underground railroad. The movie closes with reminiscing about how awful life is and why can't the world just accept us for who we are?

seriously that would win all the awards
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Carbpoole on June 24, 2014, 02:17:03 PM
It's kinda like that thing that happened with Stalin's goony son.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: Diamond Dallas Page on June 24, 2014, 02:37:12 PM
I always thought it was pathetic how people would be probated for calling a female character a bitch. The most famous being the Breaking Bad wife. Guess who started that crusade btw? lol

I don't know when it began, but goons seems to have been Pavlov'd into replacing female with woman/women without thinking about how it affects the context of what they're writing. Maybe it's not that prevalent(don't read many threads there), but I've been seeing things like people writing "the women characters" while also mentioning "the male characters" in the same sentence.

If you're weak minded and get told you're "creepy" or "gross" for using the word female often enough, eventually you're going to internalize it.
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: The Floridian on June 24, 2014, 03:02:55 PM
neat posted this in the strug. And I really wish SA were up so I could laugh and quote the outrage they surely can't wait to spew in TVIV.

http://www.salon.com/2014/06/23/gary_oldmans_shocking_p_c_rant_on_12_years_a_slave_and_anti_semitism_mel_gibson_is_in_a_town_thats_run_by_jews/#comments

Quote
Gary Oldman has broken his silence on political correctness — and the actor has a great deal of sympathy with Mel Gibson.

In an interview with Playboy (picked up by the Daily Mail), Oldman, promoting “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes,” spoke out about Gibson’s seeming exile from Hollywood following a series of rants caught on tape, including one in which he claimed “Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” Oldman sees both sides of the issue:

“Mel Gibson is in a town that’s run by Jews, and he said the wrong thing because he’s actually bitten the hand that I guess has fed him – and doesn’t need to feed him anymore because he’s got enough dough.

“He’s like an outcast, a leper, you know?

“But some Jewish guy in his office somewhere hasn’t turned and said, “That f—ing kraut” or “F— those Germans,” whatever it is? We all hide and try to be so politically correct. That’s what gets me.”

Oldman also defended Alec Baldwin’s use of homophobic language, an issue that hasn’t quite cost Baldwin his career but has been hotly contested since last fall: “Alec calling someone an F-A-G in the street while he’s pissed off coming out of his building because they won’t leave him alone. I don’t blame him. So they persecute.”

Who “they” are — Hollywood liberals? — does not quite get revealed in the excerpts quoted by the Daily Mail — the interview is not yet online in full. But Oldman, who has never won an Oscar despite one nomination in 2012, takes further objection to academy voting — “‘At the Oscars, if you didn’t vote for ’12 Years a Slave’ you were a racist” — and to how liberal comedians are able to speak freely while he’s, apparently, censored.

“Well, if I called Nancy Pelosi a c— — and I’ll go one better, a f—ing useless c— — I can’t really say that.”

He’s speaking hypothetically, you see!

“Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” comes out July 11.

Holy fuck I'll go see the Planet of the Apes just because of this.  :reagan:
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: pitstain on June 24, 2014, 03:08:34 PM
Wow.  Not a single trans person or POC in that comic strip?  This very troubling and I think we need to signal boost this issue.

Yeah, its definitely problematic.

I always thought it was pathetic how people would be probated for calling a female character a bitch. The most famous being the Breaking Bad wife. Guess who started that crusade btw? lol

It wasn't one person who started vehemently defending Skyler it was internet feminists, SJWs, and virgins as a whole that just found another opportunity to call anyone sexists for not liking an insufferable female character on a fucking TV show.

I was referring to the person who pulled the trigger on the most bans for it, Aatrek
Title: Re: TVIV and CineD: dens of absolute faggotry
Post by: sub-base turf sniffing boner diarist on June 24, 2014, 06:49:20 PM