Something Sensitive

The Something Sensitive Forums => TRUMP SOLD US OUT TO THE JEWS AND NOW I'M STRESS EATING!! => Topic started by: OSI on August 01, 2012, 11:52:57 PM

Title: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OSI on August 01, 2012, 11:52:57 PM
Quote
(CNN) -- British police have arrested a teenager suspected of sending an offensive Twitter message to British Olympic diver Tom Daley.
 
Officers detained a 17-year-old man at a guest house in "the Weymouth area" of the county of Dorset in the early hours of Tuesday morning, they said.
 
The unnamed teenager was questioned on "suspicion of malicious communications," a police spokeswoman told CNN, and later issued with a harassment warning.
 
"In addition to the warning the teenager has been bailed to return to the police station at a later date whilst Dorset Police investigate other communications on his Twitter account," police said in a statement.
 
Read more: Olympians in the social media spotlight
 
On Monday, Daley retweeted a message he said he'd received from user "Rileyy_69" shortly after he and his partner Peter Waterfield placed fourth in the men's 10m synchronized dive, failing to win a medal.

"After giving it my all...you get idiot's sending me this...RT @Rileyy_69: @TomDaley1994 you let your dad down i hope you know that," teen diving star Daley tweeted.
 
Daley's father died in May 2011 after a long battle with brain cancer.
 
The tweet triggered a stream of support and praise for Daley's efforts, and disgust at rileyy_69's message snowballed into a campaign to have him banned from Twitter.
 
#GetRileyy_69Banned was trending on Twitter as users urged others to retweet the message. A tweet from @QuotingJokes calling for a ban was retweeted more than 12,000 times overnight.
 
After the initial tweet, a number of abusive messages were sent between Twitter users, including threats of violence which appeared to have been posted by the user Rileyy_69.
 
Read more: Fans asked to tweet from Olympics only if it's 'urgent'
 
Rileyy_69 also posted several apologies for his initial tweet, including one in which he claimed he didn't realize that Daley's father had died.
 
"but mate i didn't know about his dad I've just seen about it on the news they mentioned me," he wrote.
 
In the early hours of the morning, he managed to tweet "I'm going to the ****** police station now to sort this out I will be back."
 
His last tweet read: "night everyone and im geniunely sorry for what's happened today just know that im actually a really nice person and I regret what I've said."

your rights end where my feelings begin.jpg
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Spokker on August 02, 2012, 04:26:22 AM
Watch this liberal cunt get put into her place by David Starkey. Perhaps the UK got a glimmer of hope after this exchange.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj9dA6E3fJw

It is fucking hilarious. First she interrupts him by trying to one up him on his tax situation, which is all in order. Then he puts her in her place and then watch her body language and listen to her voice at the end. Not so arrogant anymore. She goes into full victim mode.

Here's the article about it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2163918/Historian-David-Starkey-branded-racist-bigot-saying-Rochdale-sex-gang-values-entrenched-foothills-Punjab.html

The entire country is still all pozzed up, but as long as people like Starkey are around, perhaps there is hope for our friends across the pond. He's the one gay atheist who has his head on straight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui1x88kScAs
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 04, 2012, 06:23:22 AM
Not news as such, but had a quick look at some of the military figures.

Britain has less active duty military personnel than Japan. Japan is not supposed to have a military by law (ignored in practice).

The once mighty Royal Navy is also considerably smaller than the JSDF navy.
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f5/RN_warships.png/780px-RN_warships.png)
And it isn't like the RN was that huge in the 80s either.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: furly_ghost on August 05, 2012, 12:08:22 PM
JDSF can probably choreograph better too

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjAXJaFydwM
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on August 05, 2012, 09:09:14 PM
SEAMAN SHIP

FOR LOVE!
 :adam:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 07, 2012, 08:40:16 PM
Japan chose to have a virile navy and military with ships full of seamen, the UK chose to blow their load on chavs in tenements.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on August 16, 2012, 12:25:49 AM
 :geithner: No battleships?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 16, 2012, 01:04:13 AM
No one has battleships anymore. Only the USN has a few decommissioned Iowa class battleships.

The USN does have the Ticonderoga class which is a cruiser, but the cruiser designation doesn't quite imply greater combat power.

Unlike USN destroyers, British destroyers are very specialized towards anti-air defence and have very little anti-ship or anti-submarine capability. Currently, their only anti-shipping armament is the 4.5 inch gun on the bow and the missiles carried by its helicopter.

To compare, the USN has around about 83 active guided missile cruisers/destroyers. The RN has 6.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on August 17, 2012, 08:50:54 PM
 :depressedlesbian: Sorry I wasn't informed that we stopped sailing awesome ships.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: yowhatupg on August 19, 2012, 04:47:02 AM
It's kinda interesting, naval ships aren't armoured at all these days, it's just too impractical to do anything to stop modern weapons.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 19, 2012, 09:20:23 AM
It's kinda interesting, naval ships aren't armoured at all these days, it's just too impractical to do anything to stop modern weapons.

Yeah, other than a few spall liners and that, there's nothing much there. If you can't shoot it down there isn't a whole lot you can do.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on October 17, 2012, 07:24:41 PM
Quote
Eric Hobsbawm took part in one of the most extraordinary conversations ever on British television. Speaking in 1994 to the author Michael Ignatieff about the fall of the Berlin Wall five years earlier, the historian was asked how he felt about his earlier support for the Soviet Union.

If Communism had achieved its aims, but at the cost of, say, 15 to 20 million people – as opposed to the 100million it actually killed in Russia and China – would Hobsbawm have supported it? His answer was a single word: ‘Yes’.

(snip)

He was awarded a Companion of Honour by Tony Blair – one of the highest accolades it is possible to bestow upon a British intellectual. A professor of history, he was regularly lionised on the BBC and in the liberal newspapers as our ‘greatest’ historian.

Well the Nazis only killed what? 6 million? Way less than 15 million. Sounds like Nazis are more efficient than commies in terms of goal/death ratio.

Actually I guess they got their shit kicked in so maybe not. Man, history is hard.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on October 19, 2012, 06:08:47 AM
Hobsbawm was a disgrace and I'm glad he's dead.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Muttonfingers on October 19, 2012, 08:18:04 AM
As someone on the People's Cube pointed out, for someone who loved the soviet union so much he showed a lamentable unwillingness to fuck off there when it was still around.

Oh wait - a lefty wants to force everyone else's circumstances to change instead of changing his own? Colour me surprised.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: LITERALLY A RAPIST on November 01, 2012, 11:49:49 AM
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/11/uk-judge-apple-notice-on-samsung-a-breach-of-order-orders-new-notice/ (http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/11/uk-judge-apple-notice-on-samsung-a-breach-of-order-orders-new-notice/)

UK is upset that apple didn't give a good enough apology to Samsung.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: BubbaCat on November 01, 2012, 01:24:06 PM
The UK is all about defending the rights of the secondary and tertiary over the primary.  This applies to everything from people to products I guess.  Go Scotland!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Muttonfingers on December 31, 2012, 09:52:12 AM
http://www.lbc.co.uk/listen-jobless-man-who-refuses-to-get-up-at-8am-64710

Quote
Listen to this remarkable call from Paul, an unemployed man who turned down a job because he didn't want to start at 8am.

Paul has been unemployed for seven years and revealed that he was recently offered a job, but he thought it was unfair that he would have had to start that early.

The call infuriated Julia Hartley-Brewer, who was furious that he was still getting benefits, despite turning down employment.

Listen to the amazing conversation below...

Serious pro-click for the audio.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 14, 2013, 07:27:37 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2278111/Operation-overkill-Armed-cops-swoop-Action-Man-looking-mortar-owner-posts-picture-TOY-weapon-Facebook.html

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on February 14, 2013, 09:29:08 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9869714/Schoolboy-excluded-for-wearing-regular-rather-than-clip-on-tie.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9869714/Schoolboy-excluded-for-wearing-regular-rather-than-clip-on-tie.html)

Quote
Schoolboy excluded for wearing regular rather than clip-on tie

 Max Richmond, 13, said the clip-on ones were uncomfortable and childish. He prefered to wear a traditional tie of exactly the same design, given to him by a neighbour.

He was put into educational isolation for a day, for wearing the proper tie at Colne Community School in Brightlingsea, Essex. He was given work to complete on his own in a small cubicle.

The 1,438-pupil school insisted pupils wore clip-on ties for health and safety reasons.

Max, of Waterside, Brightlingsea, said: "It seems bizarre and unnecessary especially over something like the tie I was wearing. I like wearing a real tie because it feels proper. People have worn them for generations, and if you are not wearing one during secondary school then you are never going to learn the necessary skills for when you go into the world of work. When you are wearing a clip-on tie it is hard to be taken seriously, especially when you go to competitions against other schools - it feels foolish, and childish."

The school has agreed to review the policy. Nardeep Sharma, headteacher, said the rule was introduced about three years ago to support the health and safety of young people. He said: "This was in line with the practice in most secondary schools nationally.

"The policy can only be changed by governors and a parent has requested the governors review this policy, which the school has agreed to do."

Max said he welcomed the review and hoped the governors would take his points on board.

Roger Bibbings, occupational safety adviser for the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, said schools can make pupils wear clip-on ties, but should not cite health and safety grounds. "It might be a sensible precaution if a school insists on pupils wearing ties while handling rotating machinery, such as in a school workshop, but for any other reason you cannot say this policy was required under health and safety law."

A spokesman for the Health and Safety Executive added: "It seems to us to be a disproportionate response."
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on February 14, 2013, 09:37:06 PM
Prohibition of normal ties for safety reasons is somewhat

:freud:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Muttonfingers on February 14, 2013, 09:41:09 PM
That's the thing - a few weeks ago the Health & Safety Executive put out a massive press release that basically boiled down to "stop being fucking retarded, and if you ARE going to be fucking retarded then at least stop citing made-up H&S rules as the reason".
Rest of the release was pretty much going through all the "health and safety gone mad" stories that have made headlines in the last five years and saying WHAT THE FUCK YOU IDIOTS THERE AREN'T ANY RULES AGAINST THIS.

Quote
Roger Bibbings, occupational safety adviser for the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, said schools can make pupils wear clip-on ties, but should not cite health and safety grounds. "It might be a sensible precaution if a school insists on pupils wearing ties while handling rotating machinery, such as in a school workshop, but for any other reason you cannot say this policy was required under health and safety law."
Insisting that you keep your fucking tie on while you operate a lathe is the problem here, not whether the ties are clip-ons.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on February 14, 2013, 10:21:38 PM
Not having brawls with Romans or Germans from time to time made UK not much good. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on February 15, 2013, 12:40:22 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9869714/Schoolboy-excluded-for-wearing-regular-rather-than-clip-on-tie.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9869714/Schoolboy-excluded-for-wearing-regular-rather-than-clip-on-tie.html)

Quote
Schoolboy excluded for wearing regular rather than clip-on tie

 Max Richmond, 13, said the clip-on ones were uncomfortable and childish. He prefered to wear a traditional tie of exactly the same design, given to him by a neighbour.

He was put into educational isolation for a day, for wearing the proper tie at Colne Community School in Brightlingsea, Essex. He was given work to complete on his own in a small cubicle.

The 1,438-pupil school insisted pupils wore clip-on ties for health and safety reasons.

Max, of Waterside, Brightlingsea, said: "It seems bizarre and unnecessary especially over something like the tie I was wearing. I like wearing a real tie because it feels proper. People have worn them for generations, and if you are not wearing one during secondary school then you are never going to learn the necessary skills for when you go into the world of work. When you are wearing a clip-on tie it is hard to be taken seriously, especially when you go to competitions against other schools - it feels foolish, and childish."

The school has agreed to review the policy. Nardeep Sharma, headteacher, said the rule was introduced about three years ago to support the health and safety of young people. He said: "This was in line with the practice in most secondary schools nationally.

"The policy can only be changed by governors and a parent has requested the governors review this policy, which the school has agreed to do."

Max said he welcomed the review and hoped the governors would take his points on board.

Roger Bibbings, occupational safety adviser for the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, said schools can make pupils wear clip-on ties, but should not cite health and safety grounds. "It might be a sensible precaution if a school insists on pupils wearing ties while handling rotating machinery, such as in a school workshop, but for any other reason you cannot say this policy was required under health and safety law."

A spokesman for the Health and Safety Executive added: "It seems to us to be a disproportionate response."

That kid is a true Junior Realtalker though.
 :swanson:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: yowhatupg on February 19, 2013, 08:04:08 AM
Nardeep Sharma, headteacher

oh come now.
not the ethnicity, but the "headteacher".  :facepalm:

we wore ties in woodworking and metalworking, but tucked them into our shirts and wore leather aprons on top. late 90s-ish.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on February 28, 2013, 07:28:01 AM
A question here, is it true that in the UK you can be charged if you assault someone like a burgular or some angry junkhead on your own property?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mailorder Divorcee on February 28, 2013, 08:19:43 AM
A question here, is it true that in the UK you can be charged if you assault someone like a burgular or some angry junkhead on your own property?

Depends on the circumstances, but yes. We don't have the same culture of violence that you have in the US, so shit like home invasions are pretty much unheard of. House breakers, for the most part, tend to only target houses they're pretty sure are empty and if they do get confronted they run like hell. That's where assault charges come in, because you're beating the shit out of someone that's trying to get away from you, therefore it's not covered by self defence. See Tony Martin, who shot two guys in the back as they ran away.

It may sound wrong to you guys, but I'm far happier with things being that way than with every burglar carrying a knife or a piece and me getting killed because I came downstairs at the wrong time.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on February 28, 2013, 08:24:09 AM
And in cases when burglar decides not to run, but attack? I originally meant to ask that specific but well. Would court accept self defense? Also do you have the right to stop someone that just screwed up with your property and runs away? Like tackle him.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mailorder Divorcee on February 28, 2013, 08:32:22 AM
And in cases when burgular decides not to run, but attack? I originally meant to ask that specific but well. Would court accept self defense?

Yes, they would. Which is why burglars don't go about armed, because if they did you'd have a solid self-defence case right from the start.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 28, 2013, 04:11:08 PM
We don't have the same culture of violence that you have in the US

 :tuss:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on February 28, 2013, 04:22:46 PM
We don't have the same culture of violence that you have in the US

 :tuss:

ye, and that fag-tied-to lantern pole burning in Scotland last year doesn't count  :nixon:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: LITERALLY A RAPIST on February 28, 2013, 07:51:37 PM
fyi but shooting a fleeing burglar in the back isn't a clear cut 'welp they're innocent it was self defense daggummit!' in the us but hey keep buying into the hype.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 28, 2013, 08:10:17 PM
Quote
Fearon was again jailed for 18 months on 6 February 2003 for dealing in heroin.[9] Controversy was again provoked, in July 2003 when Fearon left Ranby prison after serving less than a third of his 18-month sentence - just days before Martin's release. The Home Secretary, David Blunkett requested an explanation from the head of the prison service.[10]
On 2 September 2003 Fearon was arrested for taking a Toyota Land Cruiser on 24 August without the owner's consent.[11] On 9 November 2003, he was found guilty of driving the vehicle without insurance and recalled to prison to serve the remainder of the preceding sentence.[12]
In August 2005 Fearon was arrested with Dean Thompson, accused of drawing out £11,000 from a bank machine using stolen cash cards. Fearon was bailed to appear before magistrates in October.[13]
In February 2006, Fearon was banned from two public houses in Newark. The Crown Court Judge called Fearon "a menace" and issued him with an 18 month community order for his part in causing a large disorder occurring at the said locations.[14]

Yeah, it's good thing Tony Martin didn't kill the other guy too.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on February 28, 2013, 09:31:13 PM
Quote
for taking a Toyota Land Cruiser on 24 August without the owner's consent

Why this sort of language reminds me of SA.. A car theft is a car theft. It's not 'borrowing the car for a short period of time and forgetting to ask the permission of the owner'. And in some countries that ass would have gotten from 3 months arrest up to 1-3 years of jail  :putin:


Violence never solves violence, am I right? Nah, of course not, you gotta act first so the bad guy got no time to do shit :clint: Part joke part truth.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on March 25, 2013, 12:46:17 AM
This just in the from the "Believe It When We See It" bureau:

Quote
Find work in six months or no benefits, migrants are told: Tough-talking PM vows 'radical' action


New EU migrants will be stripped of jobless benefits after six months, David Cameron will pledge today. Determined to end Britain’s ‘something for nothing’ reputation, the Prime Minister is to restrict access to healthcare, social housing and handouts.

A more radical plan to ban new arrivals from claiming benefits at all in their first year was dropped for fear of breaching EU law. Mr Cameron will use a major speech to say net migration needs to ‘come down radically’ after getting ‘badly out of control’ under Labour.

The centrepiece of his reforms is a limit of six months on the right of EU nationals to claim out-of-work benefits.

From January, those who cannot show they are on the verge of securing a job will have their benefits stopped.

The Prime Minister will also unveil a crackdown on so-called health tourism, with hospitals ordered to start charging foreign visitors. Those from outside the EU will need health insurance before being granted a visa.

There will be a major shake-up of council housing rules designed to keep immigrant families off waiting lists for at least two years and possibly as many as five. Town halls will have to stop allowing migrants to jump the queue – last year around 32,000 of the 360,000 available council homes went to foreigners.

The measures were described as ‘amongst the toughest in the world’ by immigration minister Mark Harper. They are a response to public fears of an influx of thousands of migrants from Romania and Bulgaria when movement restrictions are lifted at the end of this year. The Government is also anxious about growing support for the UK Independence Party, which has fed on concern about the impact of mass immigration.

There is nothing however in the proposals to stops migrants travelling here from the poorer parts of Eastern Europe.

The bid to cap eligibility for benefits to six months will put the Government on collision course with Brussels, which zealously guards the right to free movement across Europe.  Ministers will make the case that after six months migrants will have ‘exhausted’ their right to look for work in this country.

[Ed: wot wot?  Ministers making sense?  Realizing that "movement" is not the same as "residency"?]

Sources say they are confident of winning an expected legal challenge at the European Court of Justice.

Mr Cameron will say: ‘Ending the something for nothing culture needs to apply to immigration as well as welfare.  ‘We’re going to give migrants from the European Economic Area a very clear message. Just like British citizens, there is no absolute right to unemployment benefit.’

The Government will also seek to close a loophole which enables illegal over-stayers to continue claiming benefits when their visas expire.

And ministers will try to toughen up the rules on the  habitual residency test which governs how quickly migrants can start claiming in-work benefits such as tax credits.

But Tory councillor Mike Jones, speaking for the Local Government Association, criticised the housing proposals. He said: ‘If they are in the country legally we have a responsibility to do things that are right for people and that’s housing.’

And the Bishop of Dudley, David Walker, said: ‘Public fears around immigration are like fears around crime. They bear little relationship to the actual reality.’

Daily Fail LOL (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298561/David-Cameron-tells-migrants-work-months-benefits.html)

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on March 25, 2013, 01:01:59 AM
So they gonna seek to close all the loopholes and change bullshit with claiming benefits, meaning that all the years before.. holy shit, uk :frenchstare:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: MexicanKetchup on March 25, 2013, 12:02:42 PM
Depends on the circumstances, but yes. We don't have the same culture of violence that you have in the US, so shit like home invasions are pretty much unheard of. House breakers, for the most part, tend to only target houses they're pretty sure are empty and if they do get confronted they run like hell. That's where assault charges come in, because you're beating the shit out of someone that's trying to get away from you, therefore it's not covered by self defence. See Tony Martin, who shot two guys in the back as they ran away.

A local TV channel shows English reality TV shows late at night and I caught one episode of what was pretty much COPS UK. Among other things it featured a "community officer", a fat ginger man who looked like a pre-op transvestite, getting yelled obscenities at by nearby "ethnic" teenagers and trying to awkwardly roll with the punches and laugh them off.

This would've been bad enough, but later in the show a couple of cops walked in on some darkie breaking into a flat. He'd smashed the window and was in the process of climbing in through it when the rozzers arrived. He tried to claim it was his flat and he'd lost his keys. They looked into it and found out he was lying. After all this, what was the man's punishment? Well he might have to replace the broken window but they weren't sure yet. Boy that'll teach him!

So they gonna seek to close all the loopholes and change bullshit with claiming benefits, meaning that all the years before.. holy shit, uk :frenchstare:

Welcome to Europe. In Finland one of the ministers proposed that Finland start guaranteeing employment for Portuguese and Spanish immigrants because it is their duty and a necessary step to combat "inequality". This at a time when Finland has around 10 - 12% unemployment.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Beepboop on March 25, 2013, 01:02:00 PM
Depends on the circumstances, but yes. We don't have the same culture of violence that you have in the US, so shit like home invasions are pretty much unheard of. House breakers, for the most part, tend to only target houses they're pretty sure are empty and if they do get confronted they run like hell. That's where assault charges come in, because you're beating the shit out of someone that's trying to get away from you, therefore it's not covered by self defence. See Tony Martin, who shot two guys in the back as they ran away.

A local TV channel shows English reality TV shows late at night and I caught one episode of what was pretty much COPS UK. Among other things it featured a "community officer", a fat ginger man who looked like a pre-op transvestite, getting yelled obscenities at by nearby "ethnic" teenagers and trying to awkwardly roll with the punches and laugh them off.

This would've been bad enough, but later in the show a couple of cops walked in on some darkie breaking into a flat. He'd smashed the window and was in the process of climbing in through it when the rozzers arrived. He tried to claim it was his flat and he'd lost his keys. They looked into it and found out he was lying. After all this, what was the man's punishment? Well he might have to replace the broken window but they weren't sure yet. Boy that'll teach him!

So they gonna seek to close all the loopholes and change bullshit with claiming benefits, meaning that all the years before.. holy shit, uk :frenchstare:

Welcome to Europe. In Finland one of the ministers proposed that Finland start guaranteeing employment for Portuguese and Spanish immigrants because it is their duty and a necessary step to combat "inequality". This at a time when Finland has around 10 - 12% unemployment.

But they're the golden eggs who guarantee our future! Also, nice ethnic vibrations and enriching the gene pool, even though races don't actually exist except when the finns have a poor gene pool or a disposition towards violence and racism.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on April 13, 2013, 03:52:04 PM
Quote from: Ninpo
We were covering the welfare state and "chavs" earlier in the thread and the benefit slaves that Thatcher created.  Let's tackle one of the drums that the press/middle class morons/potential employers love to beat about them:

Claim: Benefits scroungers refuse to work more than 16 hours a week because then they'd lose benefits.  What a bunch of scrounging layabouts.

Reality: Minimum wage in the United Kingdom for those in impoverished areas provides little to no alternative.

Some stuff I wrote for the UK Megathread in D&D:

The FT's three part article on how the austerity measures are affecting different parts of the country has been completed (Guildford and Merthyr Tydfil) are now done.

From the Merthyr Tydfil part:


Full article here: http://ig.ft.com/austerity-audit/ (http://ig.ft.com/austerity-audit/)

:eng99:

People are reluctant to do part time work for more than 16 hours because they'd be worse off financially.  Instead of whinging that you can't take full advantage of cheap impoverished labour, why not pay a decent wage or offer full time hours, you contemptible shits.

Let's take "youngsters".

Minimum wage for a 16 year old is £3.68 per hour.
Income Support (currently, it's getting cut folks!) for a single 16-24 year old is £56.80.

A 16 hour week earns them a whopping £115.68 a week including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £73.60, because they lose the income support.

Minimum wage for an 18-20 year old is £4.98 per hour.

A 16 hour week earns them £136.48 including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £99.60 per week, losing income support.

Minimum wage for 21 and over is £6.19 per hour.

A 16 hour week earns them £155.84 including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £123.80.

To put it another way, as a 16 year old you need to find a job offering full time hours to just about break even, but wait!  Up until last year, that would have put them over the personal allowance threshold for income tax so they would ideally be looking for 40 hours a week at least, to break even.  On less than 8 grand a year.

If you're a 16 year old looking for work, you don't have any qualifications beyond GCSEs, so good luck getting away from menial labour/minimum wage jobs.  This doesn't even cover the minimum wage for an apprenticeship for under 19 year olds, which is £2.65 per hour.

Let's say you're 21 with an a-level or 2 but haven't bothered with university.  Prospects still aren't great, especially in towns like Merthyr Tydfil, so expect to earn twelve grand a year before tax, with a new shiny personal allowance of £9440, so kiss goodbye to 20% of the £2630 you're paying tax on, minus about £520 in National Insurance, leaving you on 11k a year.  Subtract costs of travelling to work etc from that, as well as paying for your prescriptions.

Say that same 21 year old works 16 hours part time and claims income support.  They'd earn £8,103 per year, net.  If you're like me and have enough regular prescriptions that a prepay card makes sense, subtract £120 from full time hours mister 11 grand a year up there and he's down to £10,880 per year.  So someone tell me why a wage slave should be willing to work more than twice the hours for only £2,777 a year more.

Anyone?  Don't give me any of that "pride" bullshit, because there's no pride in earning less than half the national average income.

To connect the dots for anyone that doesn't get it yet, not a single number I've posted above can be described as a living wage with a straight face.

Yeah, what a bunch of scrounging, sponging fuckers, eh?  It's little wonder there's close to a million unemployed 16-24 year olds when this is their alternative.

This is the effect of Thatcher gutting all of the industries and apprenticeships.  They say apprenticeships are reinstated, but they're a fucking joke, with most employers using them as a loophole to pay <19 year olds an absolute pittance.

With 1 million unemployed and rising among the 16-24 year old demographic, Thatcher's policy of "unemployment creates competition for jobs and drives wages down" couldn't be more true, with no one having any incentive to offer higher than minimum wage to the people that need it the most.  Then people wonder why people on benefits are angry and "can't be arsed".  It's because there's no fucking point.

"Income support" isn't the only form of help they get am I not correct?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Muttonfingers on April 13, 2013, 04:36:10 PM
The way the Labour goverment turned tax/welfare into a labyrinthine mess, it's next to impossible for anyone to figure out what bennies they qualify for unless they're a fucking accountant, or putting in a serious amount of research into figuring out how to squeeze every penny out of the system.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on April 13, 2013, 06:18:24 PM
http://youtu.be/z_pwWOJxg-k

Fucking god damned worthless British Punks that don't want to pay for the poors.

 :reagan:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on April 13, 2013, 07:38:10 PM
Quote from: Ninpo
We were covering the welfare state and "chavs" earlier in the thread and the benefit slaves that Thatcher created.  Let's tackle one of the drums that the press/middle class morons/potential employers love to beat about them:

Claim: Benefits scroungers refuse to work more than 16 hours a week because then they'd lose benefits.  What a bunch of scrounging layabouts.

Reality: Minimum wage in the United Kingdom for those in impoverished areas provides little to no alternative.

Some stuff I wrote for the UK Megathread in D&D:

The FT's three part article on how the austerity measures are affecting different parts of the country has been completed (Guildford and Merthyr Tydfil) are now done.

From the Merthyr Tydfil part:


Full article here: http://ig.ft.com/austerity-audit/ (http://ig.ft.com/austerity-audit/)

:eng99:

People are reluctant to do part time work for more than 16 hours because they'd be worse off financially.  Instead of whinging that you can't take full advantage of cheap impoverished labour, why not pay a decent wage or offer full time hours, you contemptible shits.

Let's take "youngsters".

Minimum wage for a 16 year old is £3.68 per hour.
Income Support (currently, it's getting cut folks!) for a single 16-24 year old is £56.80.

A 16 hour week earns them a whopping £115.68 a week including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £73.60, because they lose the income support.

Minimum wage for an 18-20 year old is £4.98 per hour.

A 16 hour week earns them £136.48 including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £99.60 per week, losing income support.

Minimum wage for 21 and over is £6.19 per hour.

A 16 hour week earns them £155.84 including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £123.80.

To put it another way, as a 16 year old you need to find a job offering full time hours to just about break even, but wait!  Up until last year, that would have put them over the personal allowance threshold for income tax so they would ideally be looking for 40 hours a week at least, to break even.  On less than 8 grand a year.

If you're a 16 year old looking for work, you don't have any qualifications beyond GCSEs, so good luck getting away from menial labour/minimum wage jobs.  This doesn't even cover the minimum wage for an apprenticeship for under 19 year olds, which is £2.65 per hour.

Let's say you're 21 with an a-level or 2 but haven't bothered with university.  Prospects still aren't great, especially in towns like Merthyr Tydfil, so expect to earn twelve grand a year before tax, with a new shiny personal allowance of £9440, so kiss goodbye to 20% of the £2630 you're paying tax on, minus about £520 in National Insurance, leaving you on 11k a year.  Subtract costs of travelling to work etc from that, as well as paying for your prescriptions.

Say that same 21 year old works 16 hours part time and claims income support.  They'd earn £8,103 per year, net.  If you're like me and have enough regular prescriptions that a prepay card makes sense, subtract £120 from full time hours mister 11 grand a year up there and he's down to £10,880 per year.  So someone tell me why a wage slave should be willing to work more than twice the hours for only £2,777 a year more.

Anyone?  Don't give me any of that "pride" bullshit, because there's no pride in earning less than half the national average income.

To connect the dots for anyone that doesn't get it yet, not a single number I've posted above can be described as a living wage with a straight face.

Yeah, what a bunch of scrounging, sponging fuckers, eh?  It's little wonder there's close to a million unemployed 16-24 year olds when this is their alternative.

This is the effect of Thatcher gutting all of the industries and apprenticeships.  They say apprenticeships are reinstated, but they're a fucking joke, with most employers using them as a loophole to pay <19 year olds an absolute pittance.

With 1 million unemployed and rising among the 16-24 year old demographic, Thatcher's policy of "unemployment creates competition for jobs and drives wages down" couldn't be more true, with no one having any incentive to offer higher than minimum wage to the people that need it the most.  Then people wonder why people on benefits are angry and "can't be arsed".  It's because there's no fucking point.

"Income support" isn't the only form of help they get am I not correct?

No, they'll also be getting their rent paid, free prescription drugs, free optician, free dental, and the government will make your national insurance (pension) contributions for you. Also you don't pay tax.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on April 13, 2013, 08:50:32 PM
Quote from: Ninpo
We were covering the welfare state and "chavs" earlier in the thread and the benefit slaves that Thatcher created.  Let's tackle one of the drums that the press/middle class morons/potential employers love to beat about them:

Claim: Benefits scroungers refuse to work more than 16 hours a week because then they'd lose benefits.  What a bunch of scrounging layabouts.

Reality: Minimum wage in the United Kingdom for those in impoverished areas provides little to no alternative.

Some stuff I wrote for the UK Megathread in D&D:

The FT's three part article on how the austerity measures are affecting different parts of the country has been completed (Guildford and Merthyr Tydfil) are now done.

From the Merthyr Tydfil part:


Full article here: http://ig.ft.com/austerity-audit/ (http://ig.ft.com/austerity-audit/)

:eng99:

People are reluctant to do part time work for more than 16 hours because they'd be worse off financially.  Instead of whinging that you can't take full advantage of cheap impoverished labour, why not pay a decent wage or offer full time hours, you contemptible shits.

Let's take "youngsters".

Minimum wage for a 16 year old is £3.68 per hour.
Income Support (currently, it's getting cut folks!) for a single 16-24 year old is £56.80.

A 16 hour week earns them a whopping £115.68 a week including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £73.60, because they lose the income support.

Minimum wage for an 18-20 year old is £4.98 per hour.

A 16 hour week earns them £136.48 including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £99.60 per week, losing income support.

Minimum wage for 21 and over is £6.19 per hour.

A 16 hour week earns them £155.84 including income support.

A 20 hour week earns them £123.80.

To put it another way, as a 16 year old you need to find a job offering full time hours to just about break even, but wait!  Up until last year, that would have put them over the personal allowance threshold for income tax so they would ideally be looking for 40 hours a week at least, to break even.  On less than 8 grand a year.

If you're a 16 year old looking for work, you don't have any qualifications beyond GCSEs, so good luck getting away from menial labour/minimum wage jobs.  This doesn't even cover the minimum wage for an apprenticeship for under 19 year olds, which is £2.65 per hour.

Let's say you're 21 with an a-level or 2 but haven't bothered with university.  Prospects still aren't great, especially in towns like Merthyr Tydfil, so expect to earn twelve grand a year before tax, with a new shiny personal allowance of £9440, so kiss goodbye to 20% of the £2630 you're paying tax on, minus about £520 in National Insurance, leaving you on 11k a year.  Subtract costs of travelling to work etc from that, as well as paying for your prescriptions.

Say that same 21 year old works 16 hours part time and claims income support.  They'd earn £8,103 per year, net.  If you're like me and have enough regular prescriptions that a prepay card makes sense, subtract £120 from full time hours mister 11 grand a year up there and he's down to £10,880 per year.  So someone tell me why a wage slave should be willing to work more than twice the hours for only £2,777 a year more.

Anyone?  Don't give me any of that "pride" bullshit, because there's no pride in earning less than half the national average income.

To connect the dots for anyone that doesn't get it yet, not a single number I've posted above can be described as a living wage with a straight face.

Yeah, what a bunch of scrounging, sponging fuckers, eh?  It's little wonder there's close to a million unemployed 16-24 year olds when this is their alternative.

This is the effect of Thatcher gutting all of the industries and apprenticeships.  They say apprenticeships are reinstated, but they're a fucking joke, with most employers using them as a loophole to pay <19 year olds an absolute pittance.

With 1 million unemployed and rising among the 16-24 year old demographic, Thatcher's policy of "unemployment creates competition for jobs and drives wages down" couldn't be more true, with no one having any incentive to offer higher than minimum wage to the people that need it the most.  Then people wonder why people on benefits are angry and "can't be arsed".  It's because there's no fucking point.

"Income support" isn't the only form of help they get am I not correct?

No, they'll also be getting their rent paid, free prescription drugs, free optician, free dental, and the government will make your national insurance (pension) contributions for you. Also you don't pay tax.

So the money is for food? Or is that also free?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on April 13, 2013, 11:28:16 PM
 :madgoon: some of these people are so poor they can only afford the basic satellite channels, you monster

But yes, the money is basically for food, beer, cigarettes, whatever dice. It's nit like food stamps, it's actual cash. Don't forget if they have kids they'll be getting an allowance for that too.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Doctor Jizzmopper on April 14, 2013, 12:29:49 AM
:madgoon: some of these people are so poor they can only afford the basic satellite channels, you monster

But yes, the money is basically for food, beer, cigarettes, whatever dice. It's nit like food stamps, it's actual cash. Don't forget if they have kids they'll be getting an allowance for that too.

So you get $85 bucks a week to eat.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on April 16, 2013, 11:27:24 PM
:madgoon: some of these people are so poor they can only afford the basic satellite channels, you monster

But yes, the money is basically for food, beer, cigarettes, whatever dice. It's nit like food stamps, it's actual cash. Don't forget if they have kids they'll be getting an allowance for that too.

So you get $85 bucks a week to eat.

Do they have RACIST FOOD DESERTS in the UK like they do in Amerikkka?  If they don't spend that $85 on McDonalds and other fast food places that offer maximum calories possible per $1 spent, they will literally starve to death right?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on May 20, 2013, 05:27:50 AM
UK Men: Women ain't getting pregnant enough, and it's your fucking fault (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/19/women-not-to-blame-for-delaying-having-babies)



Quote
How to improve female fertility: avoid selfish men

Women understand it gets harder to become pregnant as they get older. But they don't always have a choice

The new "Get Britain Fertile" campaign features a photograph of presenter Kate Garraway, made up to look elderly and pregnant. Her wrinkles and white hair juxtaposed with a fecund belly illustrate the main thrust of the campaign – to make British women aware of the decline in fertility by their 30s and 40s.

However, is there a grown woman left in Britain who's not already aware of this? Moreover, when are we, as a society, going to address a painful truth: that where timing is concerned, female fertility is not, as is often supposed, controlled exclusively by women, but also very much in the power of the men they are with?

There's much that's well intentioned about GBF. It claims to be aimed at both men and women. Garraway, an ambassador for the campaign, says she feels fortunate to have had children relatively late, and wants women to make "informed choices". However, GBF taps into the culture of misogyny surrounding female fertility. It feeds the urban myth of women "refusing" to have children because of careers, partying, or holding out for Leonardo DiCaprio.

These delusional "picky" females have been figments of the collective imagination for so long they need to be dusted down. Indeed, GBF is accompanied by a survey, stating that many women aged 18-46 are concerned about practicalities: ranging from loss of earnings and workplace inflexibility, to childcare costs and housing. All crucial issues, but for the purpose of this article, let's look at the third of women who say they want children but haven't yet found the right partner.

In my opinion that one-third is an underestimate. Even not finding the right man often turns out to be a euphemism for: "I met him, I spent years with him, but ultimately, he wouldn't have children." Put bluntly, many of these women at their fertile peak didn't refuse anything, their men did.

Like it or not, this is how men influence female fertility and, ultimately, female infertility.
The mere thought is enough to inspire feminist panic: women, not men, should control their fertility. Who could disagree? It's also true that some women don't want children, period. And yet how many of us have met (or even been) the thirty-fortysomething, forced to abandon a long relationship because the man wouldn't start a family?

Such men may feel that the relationship isn't right, or don't want their freedom curtailed, or other reasons, all as valid as a woman making similar decisions. It only becomes unfair, verging on selfish, when men keep such insights to themselves for too long. These are the time-wasters, what I'd term the fertility-drifters, who think nothing of keeping women dangling for years on end.

It's not that these women are pathetic wimps, rather that often they can't win: if they push, they're pushy (humiliating); if they don't push, if they're respectful and patient, they'll waste even more time. Frequently, these men go on to start families with younger women, leaving their original partners scouring dating sites, lampooned as desperadoes on the hunt for viable sperm.

Some might say: "Diddums, that's life." Fine, so long as we acknowledge that this is something many women put up with during their fertile years, and that to castigate them is unfair. Sometimes it's not women who are picky, it's men. Ergo, such men should at least be part of the ongoing debate about late female procreation. After all, a stalled relationship at the wrong time with an immature, untruthful, or simply unwilling, man, is enough to compromise or even destroy a woman's fertility. If the GBF campaign really is aimed at both sexes, perhaps they need to include a photograph of a man with the caption: "Play fair and, by the way, sperm deteriorates too." Meanwhile, women may need another mantra – don't let anyone waste your precious time.

Ladies, the fact that one of you thinks, let alone writes, this shit shows why men hate you all so fucking much.

Back in the good auld days when men held you all in shackles and never let you out of the kitchen because you were always "in the family way", the hue and cry was that society would never advance with only half the population contributing to progress.  Women needed rights and to be seen as equals in all decisions.  Men held too many cards, and that just wasn't fair. 

So, off came the chains, and on went the condoms and voila! you were free.  Only, now the Queen Cooze at the Guardian has penned a remarkably fact-free article which says that women's lib was all a mistake.  Men need to get back to drinking Schlitz, being macho and rapin' babies into those otherwise barren bellies of yours because with women in society, poor men on their own just can't decide how is babby formed at the proper time.

Seriously though, the biggest misogynists in the world are ... women.  Women in the workplace find that first-world issues of class and status have enabled women to be more like men, only at the cost of their fertility, or so she says.  Factor the author's fancy-pants supposin' that men are so cowed by a strong, free woman that they fight back the only way they know how: keeping all their sperm sacred and not wasting any on you and your best babby-ing years.  It's all men's fault, see; if men aren't depriving women the basic societal rights, they're conspiring to keep your womb eternally "tenant-free" by simply avoiding any and all conversations about having kids.  Here's the thing though: It just slipped our minds! For decades. We thought you were gonna bring it up and then ... whoopsie! Really! My bad.

And you long-suffering ladies have no (read: ZERO) say in this. The strong modern women is incapable of asking her frail little kitten of a man if he's interested in babbying up for some twenty-odd years, UNTIL IT'S TOO LATE!!!!!    Ah hahahahaha! You fell for the oldest trick in the book!  Aren't you all SO STUPID!?! This clever author has figured out the global cabal of male conspiracy-ness: no questions ever.   Not about what we want for dinner, or whether we want to go to that open house.  And definitely none about chilluns.

No, women are once again freed from the tedium of decision making by evil men; we get off on making them wait until their spinsterhood when their once fertile crescents are now rocky places where no seed can find purchase.  So, the author seems to say: it's far better to be a thoughtless cow, whelping your litter in blissful ignorance than to be sentient and all too aware of your future as a harridan, unloved and alone.  This is the choice that men have left you.

Fucking cunts, all of you.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on May 20, 2013, 02:20:39 PM
Quote
desperadoes on the hunt for viable sperm

the tagline for the next exploitation homage from quentin tarantino
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: BubbaCat on May 20, 2013, 03:47:11 PM
Perhaps it is that men know that their lives can be dramatically changed on a whim if the woman decides "marriage" is not for them anymore.  Women have been massive advances in the workplace, yet the laws remain in their original housewife format.  So they is no need for them to stick through any relationship.  Especially when there is 20% of there ex's income coming to them for the next 18 years, medical/dental/life for their kid(s), and 1/2 to all of their child's daycare all the way up to college covered.

Sounds like a great deal to me.  Where do I make more babby?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: reactionary on May 20, 2013, 05:08:53 PM
If your boyfriend doesn't want to have a baby, just store some of his sperm after sex and use it to impregnate yourself  :goonette:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on May 22, 2013, 11:36:09 AM
If your boyfriend doesn't want to have a baby, just store some of his sperm after sex and use it to impregnate yourself  :goonette:

No woman has ever done this, how dare you.  :parsons:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: whatthedickesisthis on May 23, 2013, 04:48:59 AM
http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/two-men-arrested-after-attacks-on-mosques-as-tensions-remain-high-on-streets-of-london-29290611.html

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 28, 2013, 11:01:54 AM
Meanwhile, in London...

(http://www.yaplakal.com/uploads/post-3-13552547884835.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on June 28, 2013, 11:08:43 AM
Pack ur shit up, it's over.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on June 28, 2013, 03:58:51 PM
Meanwhile, in London...

(http://www.yaplakal.com/uploads/post-3-13552547884835.jpg)

Isn't that just a sikh dude tho? Those guys have been serving in the Brit forces for like 200 years.
:bloomberg:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: ringer on June 28, 2013, 07:54:30 PM
"Hey, I'll get breakfast."

"You're fired, RACIST!"

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/get-bacon-sarnies-out-remark-4323756 (http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/get-bacon-sarnies-out-remark-4323756)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on June 29, 2013, 01:14:54 AM
Meanwhile, in London...

(http://www.yaplakal.com/uploads/post-3-13552547884835.jpg)

Isn't that just a sikh dude tho? Those guys have been serving in the Brit forces for like 200 years.
 :bloomberg:


Yeah sikhs are pretty OK
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Spazzard on July 25, 2013, 04:59:59 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWj5H_rDTbs

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on August 01, 2013, 10:30:51 AM
Primary school dinner lady sacked after 11 years for accidentally dishing up gammon to Muslim girl

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2381769/Cambridge-dinner-lady-Alison-Waldock-sacked-accidentally-dishing-gammon-Muslim-girl.html#ixzz2ajBPeAlL

Irony bonus: the muslim asked for the meal
Double irony bonus: there was no indication the girl was muslim.

 :reagan:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on August 04, 2013, 02:53:07 AM
You forgot to mention the worst part, Randbot:

The little girl never actually ate any of the pork, she realized her error before the girl ate anything and switched the lunch. The parents complained afterwards and that's why she was banned.

:facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on August 07, 2013, 10:22:17 AM
http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=24850

 :rock:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on August 07, 2013, 10:34:59 AM
http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=24850

 :rock:

1/3 German, 1/3 French, 1/3 Sheep.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on August 07, 2013, 10:51:31 AM
The first lot looks like New Monkey or Hanger13 or some shit, a magnet for the untermensch amongst the lower classes in the North East of England. No idea what budzbar is.

Being over 13 and liking music like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xbL1oUlOyE

is kind of a good way to filter subhumans off.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on August 07, 2013, 11:56:24 AM
Being over 13 and liking music like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xbL1oUlOyE

is kind of a good way to filter subhumans off.

:madgoon:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on August 07, 2013, 10:08:15 PM
Being over 13 and liking music like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xbL1oUlOyE

is kind of a good way to filter subhumans off.

:madgoon:

Theory confirmed  :smug:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: VFW on October 21, 2013, 11:32:05 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/PIxsZV7.jpg)

Bonus article:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24319583

Quote
A controversial scheme allowing people across the UK to take out 95% mortgages will be launched next week - three months earlier than planned.

PM David Cameron made the announcement as the Conservatives gathered in Manchester for their annual conference.

He rejected fears the Help to Buy scheme will fuel a housing bubble.

 :geithner:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on October 22, 2013, 12:23:16 AM
damn, it's weird considering how almost every sign in the US is :hank: :proc: , that still seems pozzed as fuck

requesting a hank with a bigass beard and fruity skullcap (sandals optional)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on October 22, 2013, 05:34:19 PM
Meanwhile, in London...

(http://www.yaplakal.com/uploads/post-3-13552547884835.jpg)

Isn't that just a sikh dude tho? Those guys have been serving in the Brit forces for like 200 years.
:bloomberg:

we kept most of the fuckers where they belong though

(http://i.imgur.com/PIxsZV7.jpg)

Bonus article:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24319583

Quote
A controversial scheme allowing people across the UK to take out 95% mortgages will be launched next week - three months earlier than planned.

PM David Cameron made the announcement as the Conservatives gathered in Manchester for their annual conference.

He rejected fears the Help to Buy scheme will fuel a housing bubble.

 :geithner:

Yeah, the money councils and so on around the UK must spend on translation is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on October 22, 2013, 05:57:17 PM

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24319583

Quote
A controversial scheme allowing people across the UK to take out 95% mortgages will be launched next week - three months earlier than planned.

PM David Cameron made the announcement as the Conservatives gathered in Manchester for their annual conference.

He rejected fears the Help to Buy scheme will fuel a housing bubble.

 :geithner:

Good thing there's no precedent for this sort of thing ending badly   :tuss:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on October 22, 2013, 06:08:21 PM
I guess something like this lead to a housing bubble in the US once?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on October 22, 2013, 06:21:24 PM
It was one of many things that helped it along, yes. Even though the bubble essentially melted down around 2008, depending where you live the repercussions are still felt today.

Also, there are still somewhat questionable loan programs available out there for US homebuyers which continue to encourage fiscal irresponsibility.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 22, 2013, 08:14:46 PM
It was one of many things that helped it along, yes. Even though the bubble essentially melted down around 2008, depending where you live the repercussions are still felt today.

Also, there are still somewhat questionable loan programs available out there for US homebuyers which continue to encourage fiscal irresponsibility.

So you are unhappy that the market isn't giving mortgage loans to people with bad credit.  Thus you use the government to influence the market to give loans to people they otherwise wouldn't have.  Then you are shocked when people are unable to pay their loans off?

What the fuck?  Are you serious?  What the fucking hell did you think was going to happen?


This is like goon logic:  "The only reason the market denied loans to some people is because of RACISM!!!  The market cares more about being racist than earning a profit!" 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: GFR on October 22, 2013, 09:36:32 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-24623652

False widow spiders force Forest of Dean school closure


Quote
"There have been no reports of anyone being bitten by the false widow spiders at the academy but if you have any concerns please seek medical advice."

Quote from: spegipedia
They are not aggressive, and most injuries to humans are due to defensive bites delivered when a spider gets unintentionally squeezed or pinched somehow. It is possible that some bites may result when a spider mistakes a finger thrust into its web for its normal prey, but ordinarily intrusion by any large creature will cause these spiders to flee.

The once mighty UK, now certified wusses.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on October 23, 2013, 01:28:47 PM

So you are unhappy that the market isn't giving mortgage loans to people with bad credit.  Thus you use the government to influence the market to give loans to people they otherwise wouldn't have.  Then you are shocked when people are unable to pay their loans off?

What the fuck?  Are you serious?  What the fucking hell did you think was going to happen?


This is like goon logic:  "The only reason the market denied loans to some people is because of RACISM!!!  The market cares more about being racist than earning a profit!"

I may not have articulated myself very well when I posted that, Sorry.

No, I'm absolutely pissed that any of those loan programs (ARM's, zero down, 125% LTV etc. )were available in the first place. Most of the people who got "hurt" in the bubble were victims of nothing but their own stupidity, aided and abetted by both the government and private industry.  Now we've got the taxpayer on the hook for bullshit FHA loans that are defaulting in large numbers too. These loans are of course made to the same bunch of deadbeats who thought they could buy 700K houses on a strawberry picker's income.

Guess what? Income is a pretty good determinant of what you can afford, and no magic lending program can ever remediate the fact you pick strawberries for a living. No, you don't deserve a 700k McMansion, get fucked. In a just world, the bank would actually consider ability to repay the loan, but government requirements and regulalion changes allowing loan originators to sell off loans after making a profit on the origination created an environment ripe for abuse and collapse.

What I essentially was trying to say is that the UK is asking for a repeat of what we got here in the US and the government has ZERO place in mortgage lending.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 23, 2013, 08:56:54 PM

So you are unhappy that the market isn't giving mortgage loans to people with bad credit.  Thus you use the government to influence the market to give loans to people they otherwise wouldn't have.  Then you are shocked when people are unable to pay their loans off?

What the fuck?  Are you serious?  What the fucking hell did you think was going to happen?


This is like goon logic:  "The only reason the market denied loans to some people is because of RACISM!!!  The market cares more about being racist than earning a profit!"

I may not have articulated myself very well when I posted that, Sorry.

No, I'm absolutely pissed that any of those loan programs (ARM's, zero down, 125% LTV etc. )were available in the first place. Most of the people who got "hurt" in the bubble were victims of nothing but their own stupidity, aided and abetted by both the government and private industry.  Now we've got the taxpayer on the hook for bullshit FHA loans that are defaulting in large numbers too. These loans are of course made to the same bunch of deadbeats who thought they could buy 700K houses on a strawberry picker's income.

Guess what? Income is a pretty good determinant of what you can afford, and no magic lending program can ever remediate the fact you pick strawberries for a living. No, you don't deserve a 700k McMansion, get fucked. In a just world, the bank would actually consider ability to repay the loan, but government requirements and regulalion changes allowing loan originators to sell off loans after making a profit on the origination created an environment ripe for abuse and collapse.

What I essentially was trying to say is that the UK is asking for a repeat of what we got here in the US and the government has ZERO place in mortgage lending.

I was using "you" to refer to those in government who thought intervention in the housing market was a good idea.  I wasn't talking about you specifically.  :nixon:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 23, 2013, 09:03:04 PM
Hopefully The UK's housing bubble will collapse at the same time as the USA's student loan bubble.

If a private bank absolutely refuses to loan a 17 year old kid $80,000 for a degree in lib arts, and the only possible way that kid can borrow the money is via government guarantee, what the fuck does that tell you?

Why is the bank refusing to make the loan in the first place?  There is a reason why.  What is that reason?   Answer:  it's a terrible investment and they have very little chance of actually getting paid back.    So.... why do we want to force them to make this loan?  If the loan is a bad investment for the bank, its also a bad investment for the student.  How the fuck are we helping the students out by letting them get those loans?


The burst of the Student Loan Bubble is going to be great fun to watch.  2016 maybe?  2018?  Gotta happen sooner or later.  It's inevitable at this point.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on October 23, 2013, 10:30:43 PM
Any student loan would be a horrible investment for a bank. How many people actually make it through an EE degree that start it? It's a completely wild gamble that no bank could justify.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: marlon perkins on October 24, 2013, 12:21:08 AM
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/femen-activists-uk-branch-feminism
 :say:
 :christina:

Good luck, UK.  It was nice knowing you.

Of course, given that thanks to the mudslimes there are no-go zones for women ready to femenenen it up, maybe we can get sort of a mutually assured destruction thing going here if these loopy bitches go down the wrong street.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on October 24, 2013, 03:10:51 AM
I had high hopes from the headline that the UK branch would be staffed by 'exiles' from the Ukraine but then

Quote
According to the 25-year-old Shevchenko, Femen has no formal leadership, but hopes to establish a "homegrown" UK branch, built up from a base of British feminist activists, with whom she is in discussions this weekend.


Great, leathery sagging tits instead of pert Eastern European ones. Some of those activists will have enough chin hairs to infiltrate the mosques
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on October 24, 2013, 07:57:48 AM
By British feminists they mean attractive women paid to protest topless. At least that's the usual Femen way. Probably turn out to be a bunch of employed Poles.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 24, 2013, 02:45:47 PM
Any student loan would be a horrible investment for a bank. How many people actually make it through an EE degree that start it? It's a completely wild gamble that no bank could justify.

Any student loan at todays bloated prices maybe.  But remember though, if the government wasn't guaranteeing all this student loan debt then colleges would actually have to compete for enrollments.  "This college is too expensive, I'm going to look somewhere else" would actually be a thing prospective students would say instead of "OMG let me in!!! I'll pay anything!!!"

College never used to cost this much.  Having a part time job waiting tables for 4 years was enough to cover your tuition and graduate debt free.  The huge spike in prices didn't happen until government got involved in the market.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: VFW on October 26, 2013, 05:36:35 PM
From the classified files of OSI comes this masterful gem:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10287574/Gender-abortions-criminal-charges-not-in-public-interest-says-CPS.html

Quote

Gender abortions: criminal charges not in 'public interest' says CPS
Doctors who agreed to arrange illegal abortions based on the sex of an unborn baby have been told they will not face criminal charges, despite prosecutors admitting that there is enough evidence to take them to court, it emerged on Wednesday night.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was accused of failing to uphold the law after it ruled that it would not be in the “public interest” to prosecute the two doctors exposed in an undercover Daily Telegraph investigation.
Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, on Wednesday night raised the case with the Attorney General. The two doctors were filmed agreeing to arrange terminations for women who requested them purely because they said they did not want to have a baby girl.
One of the doctors did so despite likening the practice to “female infanticide” while the other told a woman her job was not to “ask questions”.

The CPS acknowledged, following a 19-month inquiry, that there was sufficient evidence to warrant a prosecution with a “realistic prospect of conviction”. But it told police that a “public interest test” had not been met.

The CPS said that there was no need to mount a prosecution because the General Medical Council, the body which oversees the conduct of doctors, could deal with the case. However, the GMC has no criminal powers and cannot prosecute breaches of the law.
Mr Hunt voiced alarm at the decision and pressed for “urgent clarification” from the Attorney General.
He said: “We are clear that gender selection abortion is against the law and completely unacceptable.

“This is a concerning development and I have written to the Attorney General to ask for urgent clarification on the grounds for this decision.”

Sources familiar with the Scotland Yard investigation said that prosecutors saw the issue as “sensitive” and that it had become “political”.
On Wednesday night MPs and abortion campaign groups also expressed concern at the decision, which they said amounted to putting doctors above the law on a “whim”, and called for Parliament to urgently examine whether the CPS has overstepped its powers.
Dr Peter Saunders, chief executive of the Christian Medical Fellowship, who was among those who complained to police, said: “We seem to have a situation where, at the whim of the CPS, procedures that are clearly laid out in the Abortion Act can be completely disregarded by doctors and the NHS.

“That seems to put doctors above the law and raises questions about the CPS upholding the will of Parliament.
“We seem to have doctors being allowed to reinterpret the law with apparent impunity — it is quite extraordinary.”
David Burrowes, a Tory MP on the all-party parliamentary pro-life group, said: “I would be extremely disappointed if [the CPS] were seeking to put themselves in the position of politicians and Parliament by trying to suggest that this is not an offence that should be prosecuted. That is a matter for Parliament and not for prosecutors, I would be very concerned and very interested to look at whether they have overstepped the mark.”

Campaign groups said they will take legal advice on whether they can challenge the decision.
Andrea Williams, director of the Christian Legal Centre, said: “This is contrary to the law. Parliament makes the law and the CPS should enforce it.

“We shall be seeking counsel’s opinion and are considering a judicial review of this decision.
“We believe in the rule of law and that girls should not be terminated because boys are wanted, or that a baby should be terminated because of a cleft palate.”

So-called sex-selection abortion is banned in the UK and has repeatedly been condemned as “morally wrong” by ministers. The practice has long been considered a problem in parts of India and China, where boys are sometimes considered preferable for cultural or economic reasons. But a recent Government analysis of birth records provided the first clear indications that it is be taking place within some communities in the UK.

The Daily Telegraph mounted an investigation and published its results in February last year. Acting on specific information, undercover reporters accompanied pregnant women to nine clinics in different parts of the country.
In two cases doctors were filmed offering to arrange terminations after being told the mother-to-be did not want to go ahead with the pregnancy because of the sex of the unborn child.

One consultant, Prabha Sivaraman, who worked for both private clinics and NHS hospitals in Manchester, was recorded telling a woman: “I don’t ask questions. If you want a termination, you want a termination.”
At the Calthorpe Clinic in Edgbaston, Birmingham, Dr Palaniappan Rajmohan, was also filmed agreeing to conduct the procedure even though he told the woman: “It’s like female infanticide, isn’t it?”

Andrew Lansley, who was the Health Secretary at the time, was among those who referred the matter to police.
The CPS concluded that even though the terminations did not go ahead there was enough evidence to prosecute Dr Mohan and Dr Sivaraman for an attempted breach of the Abortion Act. But Jenny Hopkins, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for London, said it “would not be in the public interest” to prosecute the doctors. She added: “Taking into account the need for professional judgment which deals firmly with wrongdoing, while not deterring other doctors from carrying out legitimate and medically justified abortions, we have concluded that the cases would be better dealt with by the GMC rather than by prosecution.”


tl;dr version islamos only want boys, terminate girls in the womb because of gender but it's ok because pissing off sand niggers is not in the public interest.

Nuke Britain Today!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on October 27, 2013, 09:59:33 AM
When the CPS say "not in the public interest" they mean "costs too much to get the verdict the newspapers want"

HTH


edit: I'm not endorsing any particular thing here I'm just saying that's what they're doing.  It's based on money not on political allegiance.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on October 27, 2013, 11:15:33 AM
One law for us and another law for them. As usual. Less of the fuckers being born is a good thing. The bad is more excess non white males chasing after white women.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: VFW on November 17, 2013, 12:20:02 PM
Pedofag nig seeking compensation for being imprisoned.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2508723/Sudanese-illegal-immigrant-paedophile-paid-compensation.html

(Daily Mail I know but I hope they're exaggerating somewhat)

Quote
Legal proceedings over the aborted deportation of an African migrant who lured a vulnerable schoolgirl to a house for sex have cost the British taxpayer £350,000 - and he may now receive tens of thousands in compensation.

Jumaa Kater Saleh, 24, was convicted as part of a predatory sex gang for the ‘deliberate, targeted abuse of a young and vulnerable girl’, who was aged 13 at the time.

But he was allowed to remain in Britain under human rights law because he faced mistreatment if sent back to Sudan.

He claimed he was a member of the Zaghawa tribe, which has been persecuted by government forces and Arab tribe militia.

His trial cost an estimated £100,000, his asylum support costs drained the public purse of £20,000 and it cost more than £200,000 to keep him detained, firstly in jail and then in an immigration centre.

Details of the case emerged as Saleh went to court to demand compensation from the Government for locking him up. He claimed he was unlawfully detained following his prison sentence, when he was kept behind bars to protect the public.

HIs case was thrown out in January but the Court of Appeal has now ruled that eight months of his detention was unlawful.

 Deputy High Court judge Philip Mott QC rejected Saleh's claim, but the decision has been overturned
Deputy High Court judge Philip Mott QC rejected Saleh's claim, but the decision has been overturned

The judges decided he was entitled to compensation as a result of Home Office administrative delays before it was decided that he could not be deported on human rights grounds.

The decision has sparked outrage.

The father of Saleh’s victim called the decision 'crazy' and said his daughter would never be free of what happened to her.

He said: 'He was a paedophile preying on young girls, yet he was only locked up for two years. What does he have to be compensated for?

'The worst of it is that as taxpayers, me and her mother are paying for him to go through the court system and then we’ll end up contributing through our taxes to any compensation he gets – the man who did this to our girl.'

Tory MP Peter Bone added: ‘I take the very simple view that if someone comes to this country and then breaks the law then he should be sent back to where he comes from.

'Any arguments about his human rights disappear when he has violated, violently, the rights of a young girl.’

Saleh arrived in the UK in November 2004 hidden in the back of a lorry.

In January 2005 he claimed asylum but this was rejected.

However, because he was under 18, he was allowed to remain until he reached adulthood in October 2006.

He was still in the country in May 2007, when arrested and charged with the sex offences. In February 2008, he was convicted of two charges of sexual activity with a 13-year-old girl.

He was in a group of five immigrants who lured schoolgirls – including three aged 13 and one aged 14 – to a house for sex.

The judge at the trial had remarked that all three girls were ‘clearly disturbed and vulnerable, far from mature for their years and had been targeted by the group’.

Saleh was jailed for four years on the basis that the offences were planned and that he knew the girl’s age. The judge also recommended him for deportation.

However, at the end of his sentence immigration officials deemed that he should not be released as they tried to deport him ‘for the public good’.

He was let out in May 2011 after it was decided that he would face persecution if returned to Sudan, under protection against ‘inhuman and degrading treatment’ and risk to life. He now lives in Leicester.

Ruling against him in January, deputy High Court judge Philip Mott QC said he had not been unlawfully detained.

The judge, sitting at the High Court in London, accepted that Saleh was a member of the Zaghawa and so it was ‘not possible’ to return him to Sudan.

But he ruled there was no evidence of Saleh being held unlawfully or unreasonably at any time and his case failed ‘on all grounds’.

The judge said: ‘It was deliberate, targeted abuse of a young and vulnerable girl. The risk that the claimant, in his early-20s, would commit a further sexual offence if released… had to be considered as substantial.'

A Home Office spokesman said it was 'disappointed' and is looking at all its options over the Court of Appeal's decision.

He added: 'We believe it is right that dangerous individuals are kept in detention, wherever possible, in order to protect the public.

'We will continue to seek to deport individuals who show a complete disregard for the laws of this country.'

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on November 17, 2013, 12:32:08 PM
cross-posting because wtf England

Apparently giving 12 year old children sex changes in the UK (on taxpayer's dime) has been going on for a while

article (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2508704/NHS-Tavistock-Clinic-treating-transgender-children-therapies-prepare-sex-change.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490)

Quote
An NHS clinic is treating transgender children as young as 12 with drug therapies to prepare them for a sex change, it has been revealed.
More than 20 youngsters with 'gender dysphoria' are being prescribed hormone blockers by doctors at the Tavistock Clinic in north London.
The treatment halts the onset of puberty - preventing children from developing the sexual characteristics of the gender they were born.

The clinic started offering the medication in 2011 as part of a study to determine whether transgender children could benefit from starting treatment earlier than in the past, according to The Sunday Times.
It was initially deemed controversial due to the patients' ages - with critics arguing that the youngsters lacked the ability to consent to the therapies.
 
However, since then, the clinic has received a staggering 142 referrals of children aged 11 to 15 from parents and carers.

Dr Polly Carmichael, director of the Tavistock Clinic's gender identity service, said she plans to continue offering the treatment to youngsters after the study culminates in April.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on November 17, 2013, 02:02:32 PM
Pedofag nig seeking compensation for being imprisoned.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2508723/Sudanese-illegal-immigrant-paedophile-paid-compensation.html

(Daily Mail I know but I hope they're exaggerating somewhat)


Its disgusting we don't just send these sorts back. I hope the nigger doesn't get what he wants, but you never know with the ECHR. Despite a few good things, like ruling a BNP member's rights where infringed for being kicked out of his job busing pakis about and giving our government shit about unpaid "workfare", it's a nuisance that makes the UK that extra bit pozzed.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on November 23, 2013, 03:06:25 PM
Quote
A head teacher has apologised for sending parents a letter saying a "racial discrimination" note would be added to their child's education record if they did not go on a religious trip.

Pupils from Littleton Green Community School, Cannock, were expected to go to Staffordshire University to "learn about different cultures".

A letter to parents said it was a "statutory requirement".

But the school has now asked parents to "disregard a section" of the letter

Letters sent to parents said children would get a 'racial discrimination' mark if they did not go on the trip, where they would have the "opportunity to explore other religions".

They would look at "religious artefacts", the letter said, but would not be "partaking in any religious practices".

'Not fair'
Parents were warned: "Refusal to allow your child to attend this trip will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child's education record, which will remain on this file throughout their school career."

Parents contacted the school to complain.

One parent, David Rhys, 44, said: "There could be all manner of reasons why parents do not allow their children on a trip.

"But that doesn't mean the parents are racist, and it certainly is not fair to label the children as racist for the rest of their school life.

"These children are very young but something like that could affect the rest of their lives."

Another letter sent home from the school by head teacher Lynn Small apologised for "any inaccuracies" in the earlier letter, and asked parents to disregard the original letter.

The new letter also clarified that pupils who did not attend the trip would not be labelled with the "racial discrimination note".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-25066688

 :stare:

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on November 23, 2013, 08:58:12 PM
The bit that peeves me the most is such a thing as a 'Racial Discrimination note' exists.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on November 23, 2013, 10:05:27 PM
The bit that peeves me the most is such a thing as a 'Racial Discrimination note' exists.
but it's your permanent record!!1111!!!!!!!  do you wanna take that chance with your permanent record?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on November 24, 2013, 01:41:41 AM
The bit that peeves me the most is such a thing as a 'Racial Discrimination note' exists.
but it's your permanent record!!1111!!!!!!!  do you wanna take that chance with your permanent record?

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo  :pound:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on November 24, 2013, 02:22:27 PM
The racists, those 3ft tall thugs carrying their knapsacks full of lunchboxes, pens, paper and homework, are the true threat to our multicultural society.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on November 25, 2013, 10:44:10 AM
I think that you really underestimate what a note like that, especially in today's UK climate, can have in terms of impact on a child.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on November 25, 2013, 10:53:01 AM
Oh I'm sure it's quite possibly life-destroying. This only shows how pathetic the UK is however.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on November 25, 2013, 07:51:02 PM
I think that you really underestimate what a note like that, especially in today's UK climate, can have in terms of impact on a child.

Ok, I'm just some dumb fucking American, so enlighten me.

In America you don't really have any such thing as a "permanent record" as such.  In my school system, however, any serious behavior shit (like week+ suspensions) and shit got forwarded to any college you applied to along with your transcript (most people didn't have any).  That was pretty pozz'd but most colleges really didn't give two shits.

In the UK i picture a room full of fops and one of them passes out in shock upon seeing the "RACIAL NOTE" on the transcript.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on December 02, 2013, 02:36:34 PM
Pozzed Populace Perplexed by Pugnacious Pussycat:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/10478401/Devil-cat-hospitalises-villagers-in-attacking-spree.html

Quote
'Devil Cat' sending British villagers to hospital in attacking spree

Published November 27, 2013 / FoxNews.comA pet cat in a British village is accused of attacking residents and pets, putting them in the hospital.

According to The Telegraph, Shiny has been nicknamed "Devil Cat" after police received five calls over the feline's violent behavior.

Locals of the Cornish village of Little Treviscoe say that Shiny chases children, fights dogs and bursts into their homes to claw and scratch them, The Telegraph reported.

Residents say that they grab hoses and mugs of hot tea when they see Shiny on the street.

According to The Telegraph, police are powerless because laws designed to combat dangerous dogs do not apply to cats.

Shiny's owners tell the newspaper that they are trying to stop the cat's antics.  He has been neutered and is going to see an animal psychologist.

"[My mother] had a large skin tear down the arm, which we had to dress every day for about three weeks, and two big puncture wounds on the back of her leg," Carol Ballsdon said. "It is just four sets of claws and a set of teeth coming at you."

"Twice when I've gone out to get my cat and it has attacked me," Julia Terry said. "I had to throw hot tea over it, it was the only way other than bashing it against the wall to get it off my arm."

LOL at the mental image of the police wringing their hands over not being able to rein in the cat's behavior. It's a fucking cat for crying out loud, if it's really that bad why doesn't someone just shoot it with a .22? Oh wait...


Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on December 02, 2013, 04:04:20 PM
Quote
According to The Telegraph, police are powerless because laws designed to combat dangerous dogs do not apply to cats.

this is beyond perfect
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on December 03, 2013, 06:01:58 AM
punt that fucking cat over the fence
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on December 03, 2013, 07:37:53 AM
Quote
According to The Telegraph, police are powerless because laws designed to combat dangerous dogs do not apply to cats.

this is beyond perfect

Quote
"The laws need to be changed so the same rules apply for cats as they do dogs. If a cat attacks a person, they should immediately be put down."
:facepalm:

She should learn the rules for dogs too first... your dog doesn't have to be put down other than in certain cases if it bites somebody.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on December 03, 2013, 09:14:16 PM
punt that fucking cat over the fence

exactly.  also bothersome cats are easily trained with tennis rackets.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on December 04, 2013, 08:55:31 AM
punt that fucking cat over the fence

exactly.  also bothersome cats are easily trained with tennis rackets.


Cat-bites and scratches hurt a bit but not for long.  They go septic unless you treat them, but it's not deadly.  You grab the cat by the scruff of the neck while it's trying to claw you and smash it repeatedly off the floor or wall.  It soon learns to leave you the fuck alone.  This is how I trained many of my friends' aggressive cats.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on December 04, 2013, 10:43:18 AM
polonium, friend to small animals.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on December 05, 2013, 05:44:38 AM
polonium, friend to small animals.
I had a lot of houseplants.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on December 05, 2013, 11:16:18 AM
polonium, friend to small animals.
I had a lot of houseplants.

keyword "had"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on December 05, 2013, 08:53:59 PM
a rose pricked him, got taught a lesson
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on December 06, 2013, 11:34:38 AM
punt that fucking cat over the fence

exactly.  also bothersome cats are easily trained with tennis rackets.


Cat-bites and scratches hurt a bit but not for long.  They go septic unless you treat them, but it's not deadly.  You grab the cat by the scruff of the neck while it's trying to claw you and smash it repeatedly off the floor or wall.  It soon learns to leave you the fuck alone.  This is how I trained many of my friends' aggressive cats.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW8S58CYQqs

This is a real thing.  I fucking got it from a shitbag cat once.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on December 07, 2013, 11:02:20 AM
polonium, friend to small animals.
I had a lot of houseplants.

keyword "had"


I gave them all away because you can't transport houseplants half way around the globe, you fuckin nutcase
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: VFW on December 07, 2013, 12:26:39 PM
polonium, friend to small animals.
I had a lot of houseplants.

keyword "had"


I gave them all away because you can't transport houseplants half way around the globe, you fuckin nutcase

But imagine all the cool ecological damage you might have caused.  :geithner:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on December 07, 2013, 08:44:31 PM
polonium, friend to small animals.
I had a lot of houseplants.

keyword "had"


I gave them all away because you can't transport houseplants half way around the globe, you fuckin nutcase

But imagine all the cool ecological damage you might have caused.  :geithner:

fun fact: california has an abundance of non-native eucalyptus trees from australia. when they were building the railroads, a few enterprising individuals decided that the fast-growing eucalyptus could rapidly supply wood for railroad ties. only after they planted several thousands of acres of trees did they realize that eucalyptus wood warps when it dries and is completely unusable.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: rape priviledge on December 07, 2013, 10:39:23 PM
polonium, friend to small animals.
I had a lot of houseplants.

keyword "had"


I gave them all away because you can't transport houseplants half way around the globe, you fuckin nutcase

But imagine all the cool ecological damage you might have caused.  :geithner:

fun fact: california has an abundance of non-native eucalyptus trees from australia. when they were building the railroads, a few enterprising individuals decided that the fast-growing eucalyptus could rapidly supply wood for railroad ties. only after they planted several thousands of acres of trees did they realize that eucalyptus wood warps when it dries and is completely unusable.

Yeah, we have tons of eucalyptus globulus around here in Northern California. They don't work for railroad ties but they work great as windbreaks. You'll still find a lot of vineyards and farms that are outlined in eucalyptus. Also, they burn great because they are drenched in that eucalyptus oil, they also smell really good when they burn. That's the reason why they're all being chainsawed up here right now because they have a tendency to literally explode when a brush fire comes by.

The more you know..
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: VFW on December 07, 2013, 10:47:11 PM
polonium, friend to small animals.
I had a lot of houseplants.

keyword "had"


I gave them all away because you can't transport houseplants half way around the globe, you fuckin nutcase

But imagine all the cool ecological damage you might have caused.  :geithner:

fun fact: california has an abundance of non-native eucalyptus trees from australia. when they were building the railroads, a few enterprising individuals decided that the fast-growing eucalyptus could rapidly supply wood for railroad ties. only after they planted several thousands of acres of trees did they realize that eucalyptus wood warps when it dries and is completely unusable.

Yeah, we have tons of eucalyptus globulus around here in Northern California. They don't work for railroad ties but they work great as windbreaks. You'll still find a lot of vineyards and farms that are outlined in eucalyptus. Also, they burn great because they are drenched in that eucalyptus oil, they also smell really good when they burn. That's the reason why they're all being chainsawed up here right now because they have a tendency to literally explode when a brush fire comes by.

The more you know..

Tree bombs. Pfft. Obviously under a republican president would these weapons of terror be planted  :christina:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on December 08, 2013, 02:35:11 AM
Lol why didn't they ask an aussie how fucking good gumtrees are for lumber fucking looooooooooooool
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on December 08, 2013, 02:44:40 AM
Lol why didn't they ask an aussie how fucking good gumtrees are for lumber fucking looooooooooooool
That would mean they'd have had to find a sober one to ask.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on December 08, 2013, 08:24:31 PM
mountain ash is eucalyptus and its great lumber, theres probably some mountain ash in almost any house ive done design work on :jesse:


but ya, trees that burst into flames are the best export australia made to california. i love hearing about california burning down
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on December 10, 2013, 09:16:46 PM
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/its-shameful-that-our-universities-have-accepted-gender-segregation-under-pressure-from-the-most-oppressive-religious-fanatics-8991593.html

Islam is pretty on the ball, better do everything they say.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on December 19, 2013, 01:15:14 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/18/samuel-cann-dies-dead_n_4465534.html?ref=topbar

Samuel Cann, 560-Pound Man, Dies After Falling Out Of Chair, Refusing Treatment

Quote
A 560-pound British man died in February when he developed complications after falling out of a chair, a cause-of-death hearing revealed this week.

Samuel Cann, 35, a former factory worker, had to quit his job at age 28 as he "gradually became housebound" because of his size, his doctor said at an inquest hearing. According to the Stoke Sentinel, Tuesday's hearing revealed how Cann came to live in his easy chair, and lived on a "diet of burgers, pies and fried meat."

He had repeatedly refused medical treatment to address his weight.

"Me and Sam often used to have arguments because I always wanted to call for medical help for him. He was housebound so the doctors had to come to us, but he was reluctant to have medical treatment," Cann's widow, Jody, said at the inquest. "He was told he was the perfect candidate to have his stomach stapled but he refused to have the operation. He was a very stubborn man."

According to the Mirror, emergency crews were forced to hoist the morbidly obese man after he slipped from his seat and was unable to lift himself back up.

Paramedics who responded to Cann's home after his fall discovered pressure sores and ulcers on his body.

He was taken to a hospital, where he developed numerous complications and died six days later.

The cause of death was recorded as "sepsis due to infected ulcers and sores and obesity."

Doctors told the inquest that if his weight had been addressed effectively, the rest of his medical problems could have subsided.

somebody post that gif of the goon falling backwards in his chair
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on December 19, 2013, 02:40:28 AM
Fat bastard did us all a favour.Well, other than he wasn't left to die where he fell.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on December 19, 2013, 06:37:11 AM
The only people actually mourning his death will be the pallbearers.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on December 19, 2013, 07:06:54 AM
More like Samuel Cant am i rite?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on December 19, 2013, 03:44:13 PM
More like Samuel Cant am i rite?

Samuel Canned-Ham
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on January 05, 2014, 09:00:38 PM
I'm no fan of Nigel Farage or UKIP but the media meltdown over how he sucked off Enoch Powell for his 'rivers of blood' speech is pathetic. Here's the quote he is a  :ultlibrage: LITERAL NAZI :ultlibrage: for saying 'the central principle is right' about:

Quote
the indigenous population found themselves made strangers in their own country, their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition.

Neighborhoods changed beyond recognition? Sound like anywhere familiar?

Jesus fuck, even implying that immigration can have unexpected or unforeseen negative consequences is now considered racist speech on poz island
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on January 05, 2014, 10:29:21 PM
Jesus fuck, even implying that immigration can have unexpected or unforeseen negative consequences is now considered racist speech on poz island

It has been for quite some time, especially by the far left. Suggest that mass immigration is damaging to national identity and culture by mass replacement though? Everyone is out screaming racism because Mohammed is British to!!!! Apparently.  :myecred:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Rocket on January 10, 2014, 10:48:42 AM
http://gawker.com/teenager-stabs-mother-slices-off-his-penis-while-high-1498022120
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Spazzard on January 10, 2014, 04:26:32 PM
Fucking hell, my next door neighbour is the nurse who had to deal with this before the guy got airlifted to London. She didn't know whether it had been put back on or not.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on January 12, 2014, 09:05:14 PM
I remember when 'meow meow' first broke out and it was described as plant food, and I just assumed kids in the UK were eating assloads of garden supplements or something

It's a little disappointing to see it's plant food the same way 'bath salts' are bath salts, but still
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on January 13, 2014, 08:26:10 AM
That...doesn't sound like mephedrone. I had a period of fucking around with it a couple of years ago, and it just seemed like really shit speed with a shorter high and a harsher comedown. Nobody I knew chopped off their own pee-pee or anything.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Spazzard on January 13, 2014, 01:51:56 PM
That...doesn't sound like mephedrone. I had a period of fucking around with it a couple of years ago, and it just seemed like really shit speed with a shorter high and a harsher comedown. Nobody I knew chopped off their own pee-pee or anything.

Who knows? The kid told my neighbour he'd bought it online from the Philippines?

Reminds me of this story, no airlift to London for this dude...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478848/Depressed-bachelor-cuts-penis-CYCLES-hospital-treatment.html
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 13, 2014, 01:55:20 PM
what is it with Gen crY and cutting their junk off? damn.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on January 13, 2014, 07:26:00 PM
Reminds me of this story, no airlift to London for this dude...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478848/Depressed-bachelor-cuts-penis-CYCLES-hospital-treatment.html


 :pound: lol Chinese doctors have horrible bedside manner


Quote
When he arrived doctors told him they couldn't help save his manhood and ordered him to cycle back home to get the penis before he could be treated.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on January 14, 2014, 09:01:46 AM
Reminds me of this story, no airlift to London for this dude...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478848/Depressed-bachelor-cuts-penis-CYCLES-hospital-treatment.html (http://www.anonym.to/?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478848/Depressed-bachelor-cuts-penis-CYCLES-hospital-treatment.html)


 :pound: lol Chinese doctors have horrible bedside manner


Quote
When he arrived doctors told him they couldn't help save his manhood and ordered him to cycle back home to get the penis before he could be treated.



The best part of it is: he didn't take his chopped-off cock with him, so they made him cycle back to get it and then when he finally returned to the hospital they said "nope, sorry took too long, can't reattach it"

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on January 15, 2014, 02:57:27 PM
Quote
Teachers have not paid enough attention to poorly performing white children for fear of being seen as racist, an Ofsted inspector has suggested.

Chris Wood told MPs Ofsted was now urging schools to focus on white working class children, amid concerns they are getting a raw deal.

Lib Dem MP David Ward said most ethnic groups had representatives to speak up for their children's education needs.

But there were few pushing the cause of white working class children.

"Is there any evidence that anyone is actually speaking up for the white working class?," the Bradford East MP asked a panel of education experts.

"I get representatives from the Bangladeshi community complaining about 'our children in our schools' or the Pakistani community or the Kashmiri community. I find it difficult to think of a representative for the white working class who comes to me and says 'what about our children'... if they are, they are probably the BNP or would be accused of racism."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25743035

Nationalists have been going on about this kind of bullshit for years. Bradford local elections 2014 coming up I guess...
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on January 26, 2014, 02:04:10 PM
It's amazing how much of a shithole the UK is.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/prove-it--bank-blocking-customers-from-making-large-withdrawals-without--evidence--of-spending-need-222425920.html
Quote
If you bank at HSBC in England, don’t plan on making any large cash withdrawals. At least not without a good explanation. Or, maybe even a permission slip.

That’s because a previously unannounced change in banking policy is blocking some customers from making large withdrawals without “evidence” explaining why they need the money from their accounts .

The policy affects customers attempting withdrawals for amounts as little as £5,000 ($8,253).

HSBC says it’s all done in the name of customer protection.

"The reason being we have an obligation to protect our customers, and to minimize the opportunity for financial crime,” HSBC said in a statement. “However, following feedback, we are immediately updating guidance to our customer facing staff to reiterate that it is not mandatory for customers to provide documentary evidence for large cash withdrawals, and on its own, failure to show evidence is not a reason to refuse a withdrawal. We are writing to apologize to any customer who has been given incorrect information and inconvenienced."

The change in approach comes after the BBC aired reports from multiple HSBC customers who said they were denied in their recent attempts to make cash withdrawals.

 This was the bank that got fined $2 billion dollars for being personal money launderers for Mexican cartels.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on January 26, 2014, 05:20:08 PM
 :librage:  "Why are you taking out so much money?  What are you going to buy?  Why do you have that much money anyway?  Don't you realize that there are millions of Pakistani immigrants who could use that money instead?  You don't need that money.  Fuck you, patriarch"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on January 26, 2014, 06:46:41 PM
Srs I saw a clip once of some debate on UK TV where one faggot was ripping on some other because he 'knew for a fact' that he had flown first class, not business class to London last week.

 :stare:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 01, 2014, 10:40:49 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/FdbNtGc.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Watcher on February 02, 2014, 09:10:40 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/FdbNtGc.jpg)
:say:
 :goonette:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on February 02, 2014, 10:17:13 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/7rHLxBn.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on February 02, 2014, 05:46:38 PM
The Royal Family is broke: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/28/22479561-uks-queen-elizabeth-down-to-last-16-million-in-reserves-after-royal-overspend?lite

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Slacktivist on February 05, 2014, 10:44:41 AM
the royal family cracks me the fuck up

how the fuck did the entire country continue all the way into the modern day thinking "we still need a queen. she won't actually do anything but we'll give her and her family the ultimate welfare check. also then they'll still fuck that free ride up"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on February 05, 2014, 10:57:53 AM
the royal family cracks me the fuck up

how the fuck did the entire country continue all the way into the modern day thinking "we still need a queen. she won't actually do anything but we'll give her and her family the ultimate welfare check. also then they'll still fuck that free ride up"

Dickwaving/Special Snowflake complex the Brits have going with regards to "the Continent".
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on February 05, 2014, 02:53:16 PM
The usual excuse is "they bring in way more tourist money than they cost". Which is actually a perfectly sensible and rational excuse. Except that I've got this hunch that if it weren't the case - if the royal family costed more than they earned - those same people who now defend them on financial grounds would immediately switch to "oh well they're not that expensive in comparison to the NHS / the Army / Parliament / etc.".
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on February 05, 2014, 07:15:35 PM
Nationalise the Crown Estate, send the royals to the job centre.

But really I don't see them having much of a problem since they'll still get a nice big grant the year after.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 05, 2014, 07:46:31 PM
the uk: a nation of layabouts on the dole from top to bottom
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on February 07, 2014, 09:00:27 PM
Quote
[He sees himself as waging class war in his job every day, fully endorses Denis Healey's old ambition to squeeze the rich "until the pips squeak", and defines a rich person as anyone earning more than £100,000. But Crow's salary package comes to £145,000, so I ask him to explain how he justifies living in a council house. "Well, why shouldn't I?" Because by his own definition he is rich, and there are 14,000 homeless families in desperate need of an affordable home. "The real big problem here is not me living in a council house, but that both Labour and the Tories failed to build council houses, and sold them off." He's quite right, I agree, but as a committed socialist … "Well, where does it say that a socialist can't live in a council house then?" he interrupts. "Did Karl Marx write that in one of his volumes?" But he of all people must see that homeless families crammed into squalid hostels are in greater need of a subsidised house than he? "Well, why can't all those Tories who've got three or four houses open up those houses to people who need them?"

It's baffling that someone so dedicated to the socialist cause could be so deaf to the political impact of his own personal choices. Does he not realise that his example is the first thing Tories cite to justify their proposal to cap council house eligibility at £55,000? "Well, they're going to do it anyway," he retorts.

Did he not realise, similarly, how photos of him sunbathing on Copocabana beach would look to Londoners stranded in gridlock three days later? "I've got nothing to defend." I'm not attacking him for taking a holiday, I keep saying, but am just curious to understand how he reconciled such a PR gift to his enemies with his desire for the strike to succeed.
Unions...  :stewart: The full article here: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/07/bob-crow-interview-nothing-to-defend
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on February 08, 2014, 10:47:02 AM
Leftist policies never apply to the people clamoring for them because
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on February 09, 2014, 08:52:31 PM
Quote
Does he not realise that his example is the first thing Tories cite to justify their proposal to cap council house eligibility at £55,000?

 :tuss:  proposal to cap it at 55k? I know housing prices are inflated in the UK but goddamn

workers of the world unite, this poor soul is only making $80,000 a year, give him a solid gold enema
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on February 11, 2014, 06:06:04 PM
Actually I think it's pretty fitting for the British head of state to be on benefits, living at the expense of the taxpayer. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 11, 2014, 06:37:40 PM
i think the key difference between the british head of state and the president is that people are happy when the queen comes to visit
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 12, 2014, 04:20:56 AM
i think the key difference between the british head of state and the president is that people are happy when the queen comes to visit

they're both queens :smug:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on February 13, 2014, 02:12:15 AM
Quote
Does he not realise that his example is the first thing Tories cite to justify their proposal to cap council house eligibility at £55,000?

 :tuss:  proposal to cap it at 55k? I know housing prices are inflated in the UK but goddamn

workers of the world unite, this poor soul is only making $80,000 a year, give him a solid gold enema

it costs on average 25% more than the US to have the same standard of living (this includes NHS etc you fucking SA lurkers)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on February 13, 2014, 03:43:33 AM
Quote
Does he not realise that his example is the first thing Tories cite to justify their proposal to cap council house eligibility at £55,000?

 :tuss:  proposal to cap it at 55k? I know housing prices are inflated in the UK but goddamn

workers of the world unite, this poor soul is only making $80,000 a year, give him a solid gold enema

it costs on average 25% more than the US to have the same standard of living (this includes NHS etc you fucking SA lurkers)

Most people don't earn anywhere near that much though. That sounds like a very middle class salary.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on February 13, 2014, 04:11:42 AM
Quote
Does he not realise that his example is the first thing Tories cite to justify their proposal to cap council house eligibility at £55,000?

 :tuss:  proposal to cap it at 55k? I know housing prices are inflated in the UK but goddamn

workers of the world unite, this poor soul is only making $80,000 a year, give him a solid gold enema

it costs on average 25% more than the US to have the same standard of living (this includes NHS etc you fucking SA lurkers)

Most people don't earn anywhere near that much though. That sounds like a very middle class salary.

I agree. Its amazing in every british thread theyll say "yea its more expensive but we get NHS  :smug:" when that shit is fucking accounted for in cost of living studies. A british poor person literally lives worse on the same amount of money as an american poor person by about 25%.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: White Power Superhero on February 14, 2014, 08:30:56 PM
My fiance submits this through me to the thread with the caption, 'london 2020' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_LIGbj8zHk
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 22, 2014, 10:39:52 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/oJhtf44.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 23, 2014, 12:47:03 AM
nightmare fuel
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on February 23, 2014, 08:37:07 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/oJhtf44.jpg)

I'm starting to have problems remembering all the cultures I encounter, but that one looks like one of them that always packs a dagger with them because it's part of the religion. They're called, siik, shiike, sheike?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 23, 2014, 08:38:54 PM
sikh
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on February 23, 2014, 09:01:09 PM
sikh

Yeah, Sikh, I was confusing them with all kinds of groups.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on February 23, 2014, 09:24:29 PM
Ganges-Niggers
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Hugh Woattmeigh on February 23, 2014, 10:11:09 PM
A resourceful young woman kindly lets everyone know she's in need of employment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx1cf8qTrAI
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on February 27, 2014, 11:13:06 PM
In a hilarious twist of irony, London is now *literally* being flooded with shit.

Literally.

http://gawker.com/london-is-drowning-in-a-sea-of-shit-1532784252
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on February 28, 2014, 06:19:07 AM
In a hilarious twist of irony, London is now *literally* being flooded with shit.

Literally.

http://gawker.com/london-is-drowning-in-a-sea-of-shit-1532784252

Bindi civil engineer:  "This will all be worked out in Sewerpipe Tycoon version 3 point 7 point 4"  *does backflip*
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on February 28, 2014, 06:27:46 AM
In a hilarious twist of irony, London is now *literally* being flooded with shit.

Literally.

http://gawker.com/london-is-drowning-in-a-sea-of-shit-1532784252

There's a multiculturalism joke waiting to be made out of this.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on February 28, 2014, 07:27:12 AM
A mini Ganges for the Indian community.
There's a multiculturalism joke waiting to be made out of this.
Enoch Powell's "Rivers of Crud" speech.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on February 28, 2014, 12:41:03 PM
A mini Ganges for the Indian community.

Now all they need are some corpses floating in there and it'll be perfect! 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on March 01, 2014, 05:58:52 PM
not uk but commonwealth

http://www.thenortherntimes.com.au/story/2122047/truth-comes-for-vietnam-vet-after-department-played-god-with-famous-photograph/?cs=7#slide=1

Quote
Vietnam War veteran Kerry Williams just wanted to reclaim his identity, but the Department of Veterans' Affairs and another man's family have been reluctant to hand it back.

For nearly 50 years, a black and white photograph from the battle of Suoi Chau Pha, where six Australians were killed and 14 wounded, gave meaning to Mr William's life. To his family and air force mates, he was the man holding the plasma bottle.

Two years ago, however, his place in history was taken away.

RAAF photographer Barrie Ward shot the image on August 6, 1967. The composition is simple but filled with urgency. It shows a man wearing a flight suit, with the surname Williams sewn on his chest.

He is hoisting a bottle over an injured digger being borne on a stretcher by three army medics at Nui Dat forward detachment.

With a lit cigarette in his right hand, this older man's eyes are fixed on the injured digger. In the background, an Iroquois helicopter is riddled with bullet holes.

''I don't know why or how I survived intact. Sometimes I wished I was wounded or injured,'' said Mr Williams, now 76, and retired in Warners Bay. ''There are things I did over there that I am ashamed of, but I look at that photo now and I am proud, what I did actually meant something, it's positive.''

In 2012, the Department of Veterans' Affairs upset Mr Williams's world. The department altered the photo for its remembrance day poster and calendar. The cigarette was photoshopped out. The bullet holes appeared to be closed over. And, finally, their records replaced Mr Williams in the image. Instead, Dr Jack Blomley, a much-admired former rugby union international and former St Joseph's Hunter's Hill student, was inserted into this nicotine-free version of reality.

The decision literally changed history, splitting military and veterans' associations and leaving two families with ongoing, conflicting claims to that photograph.

Kathy Williams, Mr Williams's daughter, said the official records by Mr Ward, the now-dead photographer, stated her father was carrying the plasma bottle.

''He is wearing his flying suit with his surname over his right breast. Dad never loaned his flying suits to anyone. Dad remembers Barrie taking that photo, it's him in the photo, so basically he has been labelled a liar.

''The mistake [the Department of Veterans' Affairs] made caused such a mess, both for dad, our family, Blomley's family, other vets and the department itself,'' Ms Williams said.

''We complained for a long time. The minister never got back to me, but the department told us it had been resolved … when dad told me the photo appeared again with the wrong identity, I couldn't help but think, someone in the department is deliberately playing god once more.''

Patsy Graham, the younger sister of Dr Blomley, said her brother was correctly identified. Two army medics in the image, Trevor Skinner and Bert Kuijpers, signed declarations that the plasma-carrier was Dr Blomley. They said he often wore a discarded flight suit as its material eased his severe suffering from prickly heat.

''Anyone from our family or who served with him immediately says that's Jack,'' Mrs Graham said. ''He was a larrikin, but greatly loved, and no one assumes he borrowed the flight suit from Kerry. He just would have taken a discarded one where he found it … The department has handled this terribly.''

In 2013, the Australian War Memorial ruled that Mr Williams was the man holding the bottle, citing the name tag, hairline and face shape as evidence, as well as other images in their collection. However, Veterans' Affairs continued to publish the black and white image online with Dr Blomley identified as the man.

On Friday, after earlier Fairfax Media inquiries, the department said it would change its caption to identify Kerin Williams in the photo (Kerry is his preferred name). It admitted to photoshopping the cigarette out of the image so the poster could be displayed in schools.

The family and comrades of Dr Blomley still believe he is the man holding the plasma bottle. No one, however, disputes that both men were at Nui Dat on that charged August day.

Mr Williams, then 29, a leading aircraftsman from the RAAF 9 Squadron, was standing on the skids of the Iroquois as the chopper hovered over a jungle clearing close to Nui Dat in Phuoc Tuy province. They were waiting to evacuate wounded Australians. Instead, the black clad Viet Cong emerged from the jungle and began firing their AK47 rifles.

Bullets sliced the shoelaces of the pilot, shrapnel grazed a medic's forehead and perforated the Iroquois. They missed Mr Williams.

"I was born in Rockhampton but grew up in Vietnam on that day,'' he said. ''We went back to Nui Dat … The wounded started arriving and I just jumped in to help wherever I could. It was then that Barrie Ward took the photo.''

The personality of Dr Blomley, then 39, dominated the Nui Dat forward detachment. Often shirtless and wearing boots without shoelaces, ''Jack the Quack'' regularly ignored military protocol. His family says his bonhomie hid the fact the reality of war was wearing him down. He died five years after leaving Vietnam from a heart attack, leaving a wife and five children.

That day, that war, cast a long and terrible shadow over two Australian families. Some truths are beyond doubt.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on March 05, 2014, 05:49:13 PM
Quote
Hundreds of thousands of people hunting for work on a ­government jobs website may have been chasing posts that never existed, ministers admit.

Nearly 60% of employment advertised on the Universal Jobmatch scheme could have been placed by bogus firms - some of which have been demanding upfront fees from applicants for fake background checks.

Employment Minister Esther McVey revealed 179 businesses advertising 350,000 of the 600,000 places on offer through the website are being investigated.

Labour MP Frank Field, who unearthed the figures, said some jobseekers were being asked to pay £65 for criminal checks.

They later found out the firm did not exist.

Mr Field said: “Something rotten appears to be taking hold of Jobcentre Plus where the Government is allowing ­fraudsters into the heart of its welfare operations.

“Anyone can place an advertisement on the site in the space of five minutes by ticking a few boxes.

“Ministers need to get a grip before more people fall victim to fraudsters preying on them.

"The ­Government must cleanse this system and investigate to find out whether, and how many, other fraudulent operators may also have infiltrated the service.”

The Department for Work and Pensions said it was wrong to claim the majority using the site were fraudulent.

A spokesman added: “The vast majority of employers post genuine jobs to the Jobmatch website and we crack down on those who don’t play by the rules.”

The last bit is bullshit, they never done anything since 2011 until recently when they took down the ads by a certain specific spammer and dodgy businessman. People had been complaining about this specific mans scams for a couple of years.


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/universal-jobmatch-fakes-nearly-60-3211592#ixzz2v8BVXrcE
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on March 05, 2014, 05:54:34 PM
Goosing the employment numbers is pretty common for this "recovery."  I think current leadership is hoping they can dump it on the next guy when it falls apart.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Fade to Vanilla on March 07, 2014, 03:18:25 AM
Reuters got the headline wrong (http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/03/06/uk-britain-graduates-idUKBREA250SV20140306?rpc=401&feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=401), since the article is mostly about unused MAJORS being the challenge facing the UK's economic recovery  The "unused graduates" is a by product of idiots choosing degrees in the humanities and arts.

Quote
Underused graduates add to challenges for UK recovery
(Reuters) - Kath Caldwell worries she may have been wrong to encourage her children to go to university.

"I know they gained useful experience," said Caldwell, a social worker from Warrington in northwest England.  "But they have massive debts and are in jobs they could have got without studying beyond school."

Of Caldwell's four children, three are graduates working in jobs that do not require a degree.

They are part of a growing trend in Britain, where rising numbers of underused young workers are a reminder of the challenges of getting the country's economy onto a sounder footing and rebalancing it more towards manufacturing.

Employers' groups say vacancies for skilled workers are growing as the recovery picks up speed but that too few graduates are qualified to fill them.

Of the roughly 525,000 undergraduates who completed courses at British universities last year, just 11 percent received degrees in physics, maths, engineering and technology - subjects seen as instrumental in spurring the economy.

Manufacturers, who account for about 10 percent of Britain's 1.5 trillion pound economy and about half of its exports, say many more young people must study sciences to lay a foundation for enduring economic growth.

Caldwell's son, Joe, 22, graduated last year with an upper second-class degree in TV and film production from York St. John University and now works in a bar.  "I'd put three years into my course only to find out it's a completely undervalued commodity," he said.

Forty-seven percent of those who left higher education in the past five years were in jobs that did not use their qualifications in 2013, a big jump from 39 percent in 2008, according to official statistics.

Although enrolments on courses in engineering, physics and maths are edging up, experts say the British education system is still churning out graduates with the wrong skills.  John Philpott, director of the Jobs Economist, a think tank, said there was a "fundamental mismatch" between college and university courses and employers' needs.

WRONG SKILLS

Over the past two decades, the number of graduates in Britain has risen steeply as successive governments have tried to broaden access to higher education. Late last year, finance minister George Osborne announced he would remove a cap on the number of places available at British universities.  Thirty-eight percent of working age adults over 21 now have a higher education qualification, as opposed to 17 percent in 1992, according to the Office for National Statistics.

On the face of it, rising graduate numbers should be a boon to employers. But manufacturers complain their recruitment needs are still not met. "We will be at a competitive disadvantage if this problem isn't solved," said Verity O'Keefe, an employment and skills adviser at EEF, a manufacturing association. She said firms in the energy and aerospace sectors were forced to hire skilled workers from overseas to fill vacancies.

Companies would be reluctant to ramp up investment if they couldn't hire the right kind of staff, O'Keefe said. That could frustrate Prime Minister David Cameron's coalition government, which is aiming to focus the economy more on exports. 

Promoting apprenticeships and part-time education is crucial to boost the level of skills among British workers, said Neil Carberry, director for employment and skills at the Confederation of British Industry. "But to get the best out of them, access must be expanded and business has to be in the driving seat," he said.

In Germany, one of the leaders in vocational education, around 1.5 million people were enrolled on apprenticeship schemes covering more than 340 professions from plumbing to marine engineering at the latest count. A further 2.6 million were registered at vocational colleges.

By contrast, even though the British government says it is providing record funding for similar programmes, the number of British apprentices stands at less than 900,000.

The difference helps explains why youth unemployment is running at around 8 percent in Germany and 21 percent in Britain, according to a recent McKinsey & Company study.

SECOND THOUGHTS

The government will make available an additional 185 million pounds over the next four years to support teaching of the sciences and engineering, a spokeswoman for Britain's Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said. And young people may be tentatively moving in that direction. In 2012/13, a year which coincided with a steep hike in university tuition fees, enrolments on courses in engineering, maths and physics edged up by about 1 percent, whereas they fell by about 4 percent for humanities subjects such as history and modern languages.

Now faced with a typical debt of almost 40,000 pounds on graduation, according to government estimates, the figures suggest new students are having second thoughts about courses with questionable added value.  In fact, some experts say rising university costs and the problem of underemployed graduates is likely to make apprenticeships more attractive.

Mark Beatson, chief economist at the Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development, said: "For some of the young people who end up in lower-status work, they might wish they'd done an apprenticeship."
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on March 07, 2014, 04:02:23 AM
Wrong skills isn't just the wrong degree. Business leaders in the field I have a degree for say those courses do not meet their needs.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on March 08, 2014, 11:05:28 AM
The economy as a whole has been whining and bitching about the lack of skilled workers/potential employees in Germany, yet despite our (arguably pretty good) vocational system they refuse to take care of the matter themselves. Instead we get Bulgarians, Romanians and god knows what other kind of subhuman "skilled" labor imported.

Them complaining about the lack of proper degrees is just a way to lower the average wage even further via importing said Eastern Europeans.

It's the exact same thing that happened in the... 80s I think? Where companies would try to outsource their production until they realized that, yes, cheap labor also means shit production standards.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: rape priviledge on March 08, 2014, 11:54:26 AM
Lol at industries and corporations lamenting the 'lack of skilled workers': "waaah I have to pay engineers and comp sci graduates competitive wages waaaah"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on March 08, 2014, 01:31:15 PM
At least in Germany it's not (just) high-tech, high-skill jobs like engineers and comp science that need filling. It's stuff like geriatric nurses. Nobody wants to do that stuff because it's completely thankless and horribly underpaid. Go figure.

Comp sci majors are often relegated to unpaid internships - Why pay them when they next batch of idiots who can code just as well as the first is already applying?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on March 08, 2014, 01:58:38 PM
I thought Europe was some socialist utopia where unpaid internships were punishable by death.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on March 08, 2014, 07:25:28 PM
Lol at industries and corporations lamenting the 'lack of skilled workers': "waaah I have to pay engineers and comp sci graduates competitive wages waaaah"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Hashtag Activist on March 10, 2014, 11:33:34 PM
Lol at industries and corporations lamenting the 'lack of skilled workers': "waaah I have to pay engineers and comp sci graduates competitive wages waaaah"

And also "You mean you aren't already trained to do this job?"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on March 13, 2014, 01:31:03 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/12/china-maths-uk_n_4946810.html

Yes, great idea Britain. More Asians.  :drew:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on March 13, 2014, 02:25:10 PM
Polish cleaners, East Asian teachers, Pakistani and Black children.

England 2014
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on March 18, 2014, 05:12:03 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2583243/Islamic-teacher-sexually-abused-girl-11-taught-Koran-spared-jail-hes-benefits-wife-doesnt-speak-English.html

 :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Internet Catchphrase on March 18, 2014, 05:24:17 PM
Well he was teaching her the Koran properly.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Cisnormative Commando on May 31, 2014, 11:51:26 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQBclkdUFUQ

 :reagan:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a bad guy on June 02, 2014, 11:00:43 AM
Absolutely excellent video there; he breaks down why people have grievances with the EU and why someone would reasonably wish to exit the union. 
Any previously confused yankees like myself should watch that video.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: White Power Superhero on June 02, 2014, 11:16:20 AM
The guy has interesting videos and makes good points but he seems like a smug and insufferable faggot.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a bad guy on June 02, 2014, 11:23:55 AM
Yeah, his presentation could use some work.  He comes off as smug to me as well; I suspect it's intentional on his part. 

Smugness seems to be a popular schtick on youtube though, so I suspect he may be aping other popular channels in that regard.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on June 02, 2014, 11:50:02 AM
I've listened to one of his live-feed youtubes.

Dude thinks on his feet, if he comes off as a bit smug to be fair he's talking about idiot pozzed faggots and don't we all feel a little smug about those losers?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a bad guy on June 02, 2014, 11:54:13 AM
That's fair to say, yes.  It's hard not to feel smug when discussing people so obviously divorced from reality.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 02, 2014, 01:44:53 PM
The guy has interesting videos and makes good points but he seems like a smug and insufferable faggot.

I've never managed to get through an entire one of his videos because of it, especially when he says something dumb like that. I tried to tolerate some things but nope, can't stand him.  :myecred:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Cisnormative Commando on June 02, 2014, 09:53:38 PM
its ok to be smug when you're right  :smug:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 05, 2014, 05:06:46 PM
If you think Nigel Farage is too smug you might want to check out Daniel Hannan instead.  He is kinda similar.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 05, 2014, 05:55:25 PM
No, I mean InternetAristocrat
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 05, 2014, 10:21:13 PM
Dannial Hannan Pro-Watch:  Anglo-Sphere Exceptionalism. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uep7GA9hCKM

 :reagan: :nixon:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on June 06, 2014, 12:53:48 AM
honestly, is there anyone from britain who isnt smug?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on June 06, 2014, 02:47:17 AM
honestly, is there anyone from britain who isnt smug?

Not really, no.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: White Power Superhero on June 06, 2014, 03:08:50 AM
Even the ones you love are smug as motherfuckers.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on June 07, 2014, 07:14:55 AM
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/05/university-college-london-s-nietzsche-club-is-banned.html

Quote
Can debates about right-wing philosophers encourage fascism? That’s what the University College London students’ union decided when it barred the Nietzsche Club from holding meetings.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 07, 2014, 04:43:36 PM
I recommend reading the pdf of the union motion because it has some hilariously cliché Marxist shite in there.

Example:
Quote
This union believes:

5.That fascism is used by the ruling class to divide workers and students along ethnic, national, religious, and gender lines, as a measure to split them and thus weaken their effectiveness as a force and undermine their resistance to policies of austerity, attacks on living standards and public services, and other consequences of the crisis of the capitalist system.

It isn't late 1800s Russia during a campaign against the liberals and it wasn't a Protocols of the Elders of Zion club.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Drain The Swamp And Fill It With Piss on June 08, 2014, 12:16:03 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/JJaS2OJ.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/SpJkMfE.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on June 08, 2014, 12:18:35 AM
I recommend reading the pdf of the union motion because it has some hilariously cliché Marxist shite in there.

Example:
Quote
This union believes:

5.That fascism is used by the ruling class to divide workers and students along ethnic, national, religious, and gender lines, as a measure to split them and thus weaken their effectiveness as a force and undermine their resistance to policies of austerity, attacks on living standards and public services, and other consequences of the crisis of the capitalist system.

Jesus, it's like part of the petty, angry finger-wagging proclamation they read at you at the end of a show trial in a communist country before you get disappeared.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 08, 2014, 05:28:09 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/JJaS2OJ.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/SpJkMfE.jpg)
:farage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on June 08, 2014, 06:58:42 AM
So what's that supposed to prevent - Rape, or chav gatherings?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on June 08, 2014, 07:24:41 AM
So what's that supposed to prevent - Rape, or chav gatherings?
try sleeping on it
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 08, 2014, 08:30:51 AM
So what's that supposed to prevent - Rape, or chav gatherings?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/homelessness-spikes-outside-london-flats-spark-outrage-on-twitter-9506390.html
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Black Gardener on June 08, 2014, 08:39:00 AM
The homeless from sleeping there.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: HippyDrillPilot on June 08, 2014, 08:54:51 AM
Damn, those hobo-spikes are pure genius.

Reminds me of the tops of residential concrete walls in my hometown, where homeowners have broken glass mixed into the top layer, to discourage crackheads from climbing over.  Barbed wire may be against residential building codes, but apparently broken shards of glass is a legit part of the concrete aggregate.

 :reagan:

Similar story about a 'Murican hobo-spike implementation at a government building:

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2011/08/downtown_government_center_get.php
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 08, 2014, 10:18:15 AM
There used to be a lot of yards out the back of townhouses with glass shards on the walls. I guess it got banned. Now there's large gates with rollers on the top on the alleyway entrances.

In the nicer areas of town people have made the alleys into communal gardens and keep them clean.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on June 08, 2014, 10:39:05 AM
haha those concrete pyramid spikes are under all the overpasses in Leicester, I never thought about it before but yeah it must be to stop homeless from bunking down.


It just used to be a pain in the arse when you wanted to cut through and had to try and walk over them
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on June 08, 2014, 12:17:29 PM
I don't know how I should feel about this.

On the one hand: Hobos.

On the other hand: Get a fucking grip, Brits.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Cisnormative Commando on June 08, 2014, 12:51:14 PM
I don't see whats wrong with it. If it's your property and you paid for it, then why should you have to accommodate some sleeping vagrant? Anyone who is mad about this should give up their couch to a homeless person. No takers? Thought so.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Black Gardener on June 08, 2014, 03:22:41 PM
I don't know how I should feel about this.

On the one hand: Hobos.

On the other hand: Get a fucking grip, Brits.

The larger ones are from China, they actually started the trend.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on June 09, 2014, 05:26:26 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2652887/Five-Trojan-Horse-schools-placed-special-measures-combat-Islamic-fanatics-Ofsted-chief-warns-children-risk-radicalisation-extremism.html

Quote
Jesus dolls removed, raffles banned and non-Muslim pupils blocked from school trips to Saudi Arabia: the damning Ofsted findings into five 'Trojan Horse' schools


Five Muslim-dominated Birmingham schools were placed in special measures today to 'protect children from extremism' following a bombshell report into a Trojan Horse plot to radicalise pupils.

Hardline Muslim governors led an 'organised campaign' to change the character of ordinary state schools, the Education Secretary Michael Gove told MPs in a fiery Commons statement this afternoon.

He revealed how one school had played the Muslim call to prayer over loudspeakers in the playground while another had invited a hate preacher to speak even though he had previously called for 'victory to the Muslims in Afghanistan'.

Mr Gove announced that schools will be made to 'actively promote British values', as he pledged to take 'decisive action" over Ofsted's findings. All schools could also be subjected to unannounced 'dawn raid' inspections with those that fail taken over and put under new leadership.

Quote
The three schools run by the Park View Educational Trust were attacked by inspectors for restricting its curriculum to a 'conservative Islamic perspective'.

The Trust's governors even insisted on vetting a nativity play at Nansen Primary School - then banned the use of a doll as baby Jesus, according to inspectors.

The report found pupils risked 'cultural isolation' and had a 'limited knowledge of religious beliefs other than Islam'. Inspectors said music and art had been cut from the timetable 'at the insistence of the governing body'.

Ofsted also found pupils' understanding of UK traditions, culture and beliefs were not being properly developed and children were not being adequately prepared for life in modern Britain.

Inspectors were also critical of the 'over-controlling' governors interfering in the daily running of the school.

'For example, when teachers wanted pupils to take part in a nativity play, governors insisted on vetting a copy of the script for its suitability and told staff they must not use a doll as the Baby Jesus,'

It also noted external speakers were not properly vetted, including those who 'speak to students as part of a programme of Islamic-themed assemblies'.

A separate report following the inspection of Oldknow Academy in Small Heath found it was 'taking on the practices of an Islamic faith school' and had excluded non-Muslim staff and pupils from an annual trip to Saudi Arabia for three years running.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 09, 2014, 06:01:27 PM
An assistant principal of one of the schools has gone into damage control mode, naturally it is the Guardian that has gave him a platform. Here is some choice quotes:

Quote
Four years later, the implication of the "Trojan horse" saga for the pupils is clear to them, and to our school community: accommodating their faith in our non-denominational school – allowing pupils to pray at lunchtime if they wish to and wear the hijab if they choose to, or shortening the school day during the Ramadan fast – is not an attempt to meet their spiritual needs as one tool to raise their achievement. Rather, it is extremism.
This is a place in England.  :myecred:

Quote
Our inspections took place in the context of the publication of the hoax letter purporting to be a blueprint for an Islamic takeover of Birmingham's schools. The lead inspector admitted as much – "You should have been expecting us with all the press" – leaving no possibility that they could be conducted in a fair and impartial manner.
I'm not sure what he means by this. Does he mean the hoax letter will make people read into things more seriously? Or does he mean they didn't have a chance to get ready for the Ofsted inspection? These inspections should never be announced. All the way through school and college (16-18 in the UK) the teachers would be well prepared for them turning up and even the shittiest teachers would have a well planned lesson ready. As soon as Ofsted fucks off they get back to slacking.

Quote
This culminated on the second day in an inspector making a quip about there being "so many members of staff with beards" – a clearly Islamophobic comment.
:stewart:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/09/ofsted-slur-muslim-park-view-school-values-extremism
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on June 09, 2014, 08:40:06 PM
Quote
This culminated on the second day in an inspector making a quip about there being "so many members of staff with beards" – a clearly Islamophobic comment.

:dunegoonsay:

lol
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 10, 2014, 12:31:14 PM
Guardian stance is "Calm down, Christians and Jews do it to!" :tuss:

Quote
No, the problems found were about compromised science, sex education and segregation. That is, exactly the same sort of issues that arise when evangelical-backed institutions or ultra-orthodox Jewish schools soft-pedal on aspects of biology or discourage internet use.

Quote
This is not to say that the problems Ofsted uncovered in Birmingham were not potentially serious, only to dispute the notion that they are uniquely Muslim. Indeed, if the most damning individual details from across all 21 schools inspected are picked out and lumped together – youngsters hearing about "white prostitutes" in assemblies, private investigators snooping on staff emails – it is possible to paint a very frightening picture indeed, as Mr Gove did in the House.
:rolleyes:

Quote
Faith schools have been a fact on the ground since the Victorian beginnings of state education. Education with a religious flavour is sometimes very good, but disputes between clerics and pious parents on the one hand and politicians and academics on the other about what teachers should teach are inevitable. What seems to be emerging in Birmingham is not a plot to instil jihadist values, but a more familiar tussle between "rational" and religious teaching, in the novel context of non-Christian faith. But where politicians could set boundaries and guide communities calmly through a new form of a familiar dilemma, they scream in panic.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/09/birmingham-schools-dogma-dynamite

Independent - Trojan Horse schools 'tried to fool inspectors', Ofsted report reveals

Quote
Schools involved in a so-called Trojan Horse plot attempted to cover up their activities, according to damning findings to be revealed by Ofsted on Monday.

According to the report, due to be released on Monday afternoon, some institutions had put on “hastily arranged shows of cultural inclusivity” to fool inspectors, including in one case a religious education lesson on Christianity.

Quote
The previous Ofsted inspections of five of the Trojan Horse schools, rated good or outstanding in 2012 and 2013 gave one or two days' notice.

But this time round, when snap inspections were carried out with less than 30 minutes’ notice, they were found to be inadequate.

Also on Monday, the Education Funding Agency (EFA), which carried out parallel investigations to Ofsted in Birmingham, will present evidence of efforts to persuade its inspectors that a wider range of religious teaching was on offer in at least one school.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on June 11, 2014, 05:28:59 PM
Quote
This is not to say that the problems Ofsted uncovered in Birmingham were not potentially serious, only to dispute the notion that they are uniquely Muslim. Indeed, if the most damning individual details from across all 21 schools inspected are picked out and lumped together – youngsters hearing about "white prostitutes" in assemblies, private investigators snooping on staff emails – it is possible to paint a very frightening picture indeed, as Mr Gove did in the House.
:rolleyes:

They've started using "prostitutes" instead of "whores", that's a bit better I guess.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 11, 2014, 06:09:21 PM
Employment stats are in, lets have a look at the bit the media isn't publicising widely.

Quote
Estimates of employment by nationality and country of birth are available back to 1997. For January to March 1997 there were 928,000 non-UK nationals working in the UK (3.5% of all people working in the UK). For January to March 2014, there were 2.77 million non-UK nationals working in the UK (9.1% of all people working in the UK). This increase in the number of non-UK nationals working in the UK since 1997 partly reflects the admission of several new member states to the European Union.

Quote
Looking at the estimates by nationality, between January to March 2013 and January to March 2014:

• the number of UK nationals working in the UK increased by 563,000 to reach 27.57 million, and
• the number of non-UK nationals working in the UK increased by 178,000 to reach 2.77 million.

The number of people in work who were non-UK born is higher than those who were non-UK nationals as some people born abroad are UK nationals. For January to March 2014, 4.55 million people in work were born abroad, 1.78 million higher than the number of non-UK nationals in work.

Looking at the estimates by country of birth, between January to March 2013 and January to March2014:

• the number of UK born people working in the UK increased by 447,000 to reach 25.77 million
• the number of non-UK born people working in the UK increased by 292,000 to reach 4.55 million.
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_363998.pdf
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 15, 2014, 12:36:22 AM
Finally, we white niggers finally get our oppression points recognised.

Quote
Higher Blackley (pronounced “Blakeley”) is mostly inhabited by the white working class, a poorly understood group across western Europe. It’s a class hit by deindustrialisation, economic crisis and the crumbling of the welfare state. It’s the class that supposedly backed the anti-immigration populists who dominated last month’s European elections. It’s a class typically depicted either as a joke or a threat. The caricature: half-witted racist scroungers in tracksuits milking the welfare state from their sofas.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/4139381a-f1bb-11e3-a2da-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz34g4iHs70

:farage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on June 21, 2014, 10:42:12 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2659237/More-Brits-signing-fight-jihadist-militants-Iraq-Syria-UK-Army-Reserve.html#ixzz34tMlwnQh

Quote
More Brits signing up to fight with jihadist militants in Iraq and Syria than for the UK Army Reserve


More British citizens signed up to fight in Iraq and Syria than joined the Army Reserve last year, it can be revealed.

Just 170 extra reservists enlisted over the past year - despite a Government target to boost the stand-by force by 11,000 by 2018.

But at the same time the brutal al-Qaeda inspired ISIS forces tearing through Iraq have been boosted by 'several hundred' Brits, ministers told MailOnline.

Terror experts believe there could be as many as 500 Brits fighting alongside the jihadists in the Middle East for ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria).

A senior government minister said: ‘There is a real problem about people going in and being radicalised and then coming home. There are several hundred who have gone from Britain that we know of. It is a worry.

'To get to Iraq most of them will have to go through Syria, so the two are connected.’

Foreign Secretary William Hague yesterday admitted Brit will 'inevitably' be fighting alongside ISIS which he called the 'most violent and brutal militant group in the Middle East'.

He said the majority of Isis' members were Iraqi or Syrian but 'it also includes a significant number of foreign fighters among its ranks'.

Mr Hague said: 'As I have previously told this House, we estimate the number of UK-linked individuals fighting in Syria to include approximately 400 British nationals and other UK-linked individuals who could present a particular risk should they return to the UK.' He said 'some of these, inevitably' are 'fighting with' Isis.

Shadow defence secretary Vernon Coaker said he revelation was humiliating for the country and needed to be tackled.


Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on June 21, 2014, 11:41:43 PM
well thats a positive actually, they're going back to where they came from
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on June 23, 2014, 07:56:49 AM
NHS boob job model Josie Cunningham gets free taxis worth £6k - because she's too infamous to take bus
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/josie-cunningham-nhs-boob-job-3746075
(http://i.imgur.com/eckzjFL.jpg)

 What the fuck is going on? Is this bitch sucking off some desperate civil servant or what? :razor:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 23, 2014, 03:30:15 PM
NHS boob job model Josie Cunningham gets free taxis worth £6k - because she's too infamous to take bus
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/josie-cunningham-nhs-boob-job-3746075
(http://i.imgur.com/eckzjFL.jpg)

 What the fuck is going on? Is this bitch sucking off some desperate civil servant or what? :razor:
23 going on 45...jesus.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on June 24, 2014, 09:35:18 AM
NHS boob job model Josie Cunningham gets free taxis worth £6k - because she's too infamous to take bus
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/josie-cunningham-nhs-boob-job-3746075
(http://i.imgur.com/eckzjFL.jpg)

 What the fuck is going on? Is this bitch sucking off some desperate civil servant or what? :razor:

Looks like they did a spontaneous nose enlargement as well.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on June 24, 2014, 05:23:58 PM
Looks like they did a spontaneous nose enlargement as well.

The better to jew you with, my dear.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on July 08, 2014, 10:06:29 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html

Quote
'Paedophilia is natural and normal for males'

How some university academics make the case for paedophiles at summer conferences


 "Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.

 Another attendee, and enthusiastic participant from the floor, was one Tom O’Carroll, a multiple child sex offender, long-time campaigner for the legalisation of sex with children and former head of the Paedophile Information Exchange. “Wonderful!” he wrote on his blog afterwards. “It was a rare few days when I could feel relatively popular!”

Last week, after the conviction of Rolf Harris, the report into Jimmy Savile and claims of an establishment cover-up to protect a sex-offending minister in Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet, Britain went into a convulsion of anxiety about child abuse in the Eighties. But unnoticed amid the furore is a much more current threat: attempts, right now, in parts of the academic establishment to push the boundaries on the acceptability of child sex.

 :dinorage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on July 08, 2014, 01:00:45 PM
Remember how some anti-gay folks were saying sexual liberation and liberalism in general would inevitably next lead to approval of zoophilia and pedophilia? Oh how I laughed at them.

I'm no longer laughing.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on July 08, 2014, 05:15:39 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html

Quote
'Paedophilia is natural and normal for males'

How some university academics make the case for paedophiles at summer conferences


 "Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.

Another attendee, and enthusiastic participant from the floor, was one Tom O’Carroll, a multiple child sex offender, long-time campaigner for the legalisation of sex with children and former head of the Paedophile Information Exchange. “Wonderful!” he wrote on his blog afterwards. “It was a rare few days when I could feel relatively popular!”

Last week, after the conviction of Rolf Harris, the report into Jimmy Savile and claims of an establishment cover-up to protect a sex-offending minister in Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet, Britain went into a convulsion of anxiety about child abuse in the Eighties. But unnoticed amid the furore is a much more current threat: attempts, right now, in parts of the academic establishment to push the boundaries on the acceptability of child sex.

 :dinorage:

My gut feeling is that the guy in the bolded part is a fag. I don't mean that being gay means you're a pedophile, but pedophiles like that seems to have been riding on the coattails, and hide under the skirts, of the homosexual "sexual minority" movement for the last 50-60 years. It just seems like the people that are "out and proud" about being pedophiles are usually homosexuals.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on July 08, 2014, 05:32:37 PM
Fuck, PIE is back.

Remember how some anti-gay folks were saying sexual liberation and liberalism in general would inevitably next lead to approval of zoophilia and pedophilia? Oh how I laughed at them.

I'm no longer laughing.

The 80s and earlier gay rights movement was full of little paedo groups intertwined with their movement. They kind of got purged when gays became more accepted. PIE was supported by Liberty/NCCL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_(pressure_group)) and some paedofag libertarians in the Conservative party and some Labour figures. Some are still fairly powerful in politics today.

When I saw this article scrolling through the thread I thought it was going to be something about sexual dimorphism and the male attraction towards neotenic features. Instead I see these padeo bastards have wormed their way in somewhere again. UKIP or nationalists can not have a presence on campus but a bunch of convicted sex offenders and paedophile activists are. This country.  :myecred:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on July 10, 2014, 09:46:18 AM
Remember how some anti-gay folks were saying sexual liberation and liberalism in general would inevitably next lead to approval of zoophilia and pedophilia? Oh how I laughed at them.

I'm no longer laughing.

If you want fuck your dog go ahead. It's just a fucking dog. Not like they are intelligent or have feelings anyway.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on July 10, 2014, 11:07:03 AM
its scary how if that was a quote from sa or something I'd almost believe it
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on July 10, 2014, 12:30:24 PM
Remember how some anti-gay folks were saying sexual liberation and liberalism in general would inevitably next lead to approval of zoophilia and pedophilia? Oh how I laughed at them.

I'm no longer laughing.

If you want fuck your dog go ahead. It's just a fucking dog. Not like they are intelligent or have feelings anyway.

There is a German dog fucking advocacy group.  http://www.zeta-verein.de/en/  :stare:

In fact just go straight to this Vice article: http://www.vice.com/read/bestiality-is-still-legal-in-germany-but-not-for-long?utm_source=vicefbus
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on July 10, 2014, 12:34:17 PM
Remember how some anti-gay folks were saying sexual liberation and liberalism in general would inevitably next lead to approval of zoophilia and pedophilia? Oh how I laughed at them.

I'm no longer laughing.

If you want fuck your dog go ahead. It's just a fucking dog. Not like they are intelligent or have feelings anyway.

There is a German dog fucking advocacy group.  http://www.zeta-verein.de/en/  :stare:

Of course there is.

 :razor:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on July 10, 2014, 12:34:42 PM
It's Germany, dude. If you can think of an object, there's a German group advocating fucking it, a 200 page document outlining the details of said object and correct fucking procedure and an eight syllable word to describe the feeling you get when you fuck it.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on July 10, 2014, 02:02:50 PM
It's Germany, dude. If you can think of an object, there's a German group advocating fucking it, a 200 page document outlining the details of said object and correct fucking procedure and an eight syllable word to describe the feeling you get when you fuck it.

it's "schicksalsergeben"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on July 14, 2014, 03:45:33 AM
http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/billingham-paramedic-mark-lakinski-who-7413523

Lazy ambulance driver doesn't drive straight to hospital with dying patient so he can clock off, gets sacked, gets job as an ambulance driver. A mate of SA poster General China?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on July 20, 2014, 08:01:20 PM
My DAD and my HUSBAND are becoming women - and I support them both (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/dad-husband-becoming-women---3882689)

(http://i.imgur.com/tTc50ea.png)

Quote
They say every woman marries a man like her father.

But for Lleahan Perry that proved particularly true... because her dad and her husband are both having sex change operations.


Lleahan was 15 when stepfather Stephen confessed he liked cross-dressing.

Three years later the ex-sailor started living as a woman, taking hormones and calling himself Helen.

Supportive Lleahan welcomed the change – pleased her dad was no longer living a lie.

But months later she was stunned when fiancé Christopher Parent revealed he also wanted to live as a woman.

In a three-hour heart-to-heart, Lleahan’s dad helped 22-year-old Christopher come to terms with his feelings.

And now Christopher, called ChiChi by the family, and Helen are both planning to go through gender ­reassignment surgery.

But before having the op, Lleahan, 21, and ChiChi decided to marry. They tied the knot at a ceremony in France this month and are expecting their first baby in November.

Lleahan, born in Piddlehinton, Dorset, but now living in Limoges, France, explains: “It was a beautiful ceremony. We had a massive party with all our friends and family.

“Only a very few people know about ChiChi’s transition so we decided he would dress as a man.

“But he was jealous of my dress. I knew he wanted to wear it.

“He’s much happier now he’s started to come out and dress as his alter ego more often. Our sex life hasn’t suffered at all.

“I’m attracted to men and women so I don’t mind. I just accept everything these days. You are the way you are.”
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on July 20, 2014, 09:34:55 PM
Look at her. Can you blame them?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on July 21, 2014, 03:19:56 AM
Well, the upside to the paki's taking over britain is that they'll kill those broken faggots and put that ugly bitch in a black ninja dress.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on July 22, 2014, 02:00:41 AM
Well, the upside to the paki's taking over britain is that they'll kill those broken faggots and put that ugly bitch in a black ninja dress.

i thought ninjas wore tight form-fighting stuff, that might not be as good as it sounds tbh
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on August 05, 2014, 05:23:58 PM
The Decline of the UK's village green continues:

Gardeners' Question Time? It's so racist: Sociologist rails at references to 'non-native' plants (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2716106/Gardeners-Question-Time-caught-race-row.html)

Quote
Dr. Ben Pitcher, a senior lecturer in sociology at the University of Westminster, says the panel show is ‘saturated’ with racial language.
From debates about native and non-native plant species to advice about the purity of different soil types, the programme’s resident green-fingered experts are secretly feeding nationalist and fascist fantasies, he claims.

Speaking on another Radio 4 programme, Thinking Allowed, he said: ‘Gardeners’ Question Time is not the most controversial show on Radio 4, and yet it is layered with, saturated with, racial meanings. The context here is the rise of nationalism. The rise of racist and fascist parties across Europe. Nationalism is about shoring up a fantasy of national integrity. My question is, what feeds nationalism? What makes nationalism powerful?’

(http://i.imgur.com/uK7tNps.png)

And what, pray tell, does "Dr." Ben "Pitcher? More like Catcher" Pitcher look like? Pretty much how you'd expect:

(http://i.imgur.com/NLOAcGU.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on August 05, 2014, 06:04:41 PM
 I will mulch my lawn with the blood of my nations enemies.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on August 05, 2014, 11:02:03 PM
The Decline of the UK's village green continues:

Gardeners' Question Time? It's so racist: Sociologist rails at references to 'non-native' plants (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2716106/Gardeners-Question-Time-caught-race-row.html)

Quote
Dr. Ben Pitcher, a senior lecturer in sociology at the University of Westminster, says the panel show is ‘saturated’ with racial language.
From debates about native and non-native plant species to advice about the purity of different soil types, the programme’s resident green-fingered experts are secretly feeding nationalist and fascist fantasies, he claims.

Speaking on another Radio 4 programme, Thinking Allowed, he said: ‘Gardeners’ Question Time is not the most controversial show on Radio 4, and yet it is layered with, saturated with, racial meanings. The context here is the rise of nationalism. The rise of racist and fascist parties across Europe. Nationalism is about shoring up a fantasy of national integrity. My question is, what feeds nationalism? What makes nationalism powerful?’

(http://i.imgur.com/uK7tNps.png)

And what, pray tell, does "Dr." Ben "Pitcher? More like Catcher" Pitcher look like? Pretty much how you'd expect:

(http://i.imgur.com/NLOAcGU.jpg)

Good fucking lord - I thought the left was for protecting the environment?  Screwing up ecosystems and especially in islands is a big damn deal.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on August 05, 2014, 11:13:45 PM
wow thats disgusting
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on August 07, 2014, 07:44:26 PM
I've never heard of niggers being  called spades.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on August 07, 2014, 07:57:12 PM
I've never heard of niggers being  called spades.
That's because spade does not mean nigger anywhere.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on August 07, 2014, 09:04:41 PM
I've lived my whole life in 'racist' middle america and never heard a nigger called a spade.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on August 07, 2014, 09:16:15 PM
That's because nobody has called somebody a spade for 40 years, and I lolled at the idea of them explaining it in a British paper. It's as outdated as "spearchucker".

It made it into the "Racist Word Association" sketch on SNL with Richard Pryor and Chevy Chase, but that was a long list of racial epithets that included "jungle bunny" and "burrhead", and it was December 1975.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Slacktivist on August 07, 2014, 11:14:57 PM
I thought this entire forum was about calling a spade a spade.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on August 07, 2014, 11:40:07 PM
I prefer the term shines or moon crickets.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on August 09, 2014, 02:48:40 AM
Yeah I have heard old people say spade but nobody under the age of 55.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on August 16, 2014, 01:46:35 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/YOQBVoU.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 16, 2014, 09:00:29 PM
looks like britain has caught some cultural backwash from india
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on August 17, 2014, 12:58:27 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPxiXGr9nFM
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on August 22, 2014, 01:34:52 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730791/Are-STUPID-Britons-people-IQ-decline.html

Quote
ARE BRITISH TEENAGERS BECOMING LESS INTELLIGENT?

Tests carried out in 1980 and in 2008 showed that the average 14-year-old was two IQ points cleverer in 1980, according to a study published in 2009.

Scientists found that performance dropped the most dramatically in teenagers in the upper half of the intelligence scale, The Telegraph reported.

Brighter teens who took part in the study in 2008 were on average six IQ points less intelligent than their counterparts tested 28 years earlier.

Professor Fynn said the results could be the result of less intelligent youth culture.

He used data gathered in IQ tests on UK children and found that children aged between five and 10 saw their IQs increase by half a point per year over three decades.

'Other studies have shown how pervasive teenage youth culture is, and what we see is parents' influence on IQ slowly diminishing with age,' he said.

'...What we know is that youth culture is now more visually orientated around computer games than they are in terms of reading and holding conversations.'


So it looks like "Evidence suggests that the IQs of people in the UK, Denmark and Australia have declined in the last decade."

Gee, I wonder if this has to do with Europeons getting dumber, or *gasp* IMMIGRATION lowering the average.  What do you think?  :rolleyes:

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on August 22, 2014, 03:04:07 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730791/Are-STUPID-Britons-people-IQ-decline.html

Quote
ARE BRITISH TEENAGERS BECOMING LESS INTELLIGENT?

Tests carried out in 1980 and in 2008 showed that the average 14-year-old was two IQ points cleverer in 1980, according to a study published in 2009.

Scientists found that performance dropped the most dramatically in teenagers in the upper half of the intelligence scale, The Telegraph reported.

Brighter teens who took part in the study in 2008 were on average six IQ points less intelligent than their counterparts tested 28 years earlier.

Professor Fynn said the results could be the result of less intelligent youth culture.

He used data gathered in IQ tests on UK children and found that children aged between five and 10 saw their IQs increase by half a point per year over three decades.

'Other studies have shown how pervasive teenage youth culture is, and what we see is parents' influence on IQ slowly diminishing with age,' he said.

'...What we know is that youth culture is now more visually orientated around computer games than they are in terms of reading and holding conversations.'


So it looks like "Evidence suggests that the IQs of people in the UK, Denmark and Australia have declined in the last decade."

Gee, I wonder if this has to do with Europeons getting dumber, or *gasp* IMMIGRATION lowering the average.  What do you think?  :rolleyes:

This is further supported by the fact that people on average are getting smarter. So if you are registering a drop over time you are really diluting yourself with the lower average iq groups.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 22, 2014, 03:20:49 AM
yeah but people just take it as an education failing and therefore we need to spend more money on education, because after all, we're all equal right?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hair sniffing boner diary on August 22, 2014, 02:10:04 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730791/Are-STUPID-Britons-people-IQ-decline.html
>snip<

I like the question posed by the URL more-- "Are STUPID Britons people?"  Down with chav personhood, pack mule pakis
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: MexicanKetchup on August 24, 2014, 07:43:48 AM
Over here in Finland there's been a minor scandal a-brewin' over PISA test scores. Traditionally Finland has been one of the leading countries (often the number one country in fact) in child test scores. Lately these numbers have been going down fast, strangely as immigration increases and more and more schools have classes that are over half "immigrant" (sand niggers and niggers mostly).

Of course this presents a problem for right thinking leftists, because these kids are largely born in Finland, have access to literally everything Finnish kids have (and more, because they often get personalized tutoring in school because they can't cope otherwise) and still the test scores are plummeting. So aside from the normal "WHERE HAVE WE FAILED THESE LITTLE ANGELS" hand-wringing there are now efforts underway to basically eliminate as many immigrants from PISA tests as possible by tweaking which schools' tests get used etc.

It's hilarious as fuck watching these dumb assholes twist themselves into loops in an effort to avoid the inevitable conclusions.

E: didn't read this yet so I don't know if it's real talk or hilarious hand wringing but some talk on the subject

https://www.jyu.fi/en/news/archive/2014/08/tiedote-2014-08-15-14-56-41-604088
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on August 24, 2014, 11:16:37 AM
Let me guess it's all those racist white Finns holding them back with their mentally projected hate-waves?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: MexicanKetchup on August 24, 2014, 02:29:44 PM
Let me guess it's all those racist white Finns holding them back with their mentally projected hate-waves?

More money is needed for integration, also attitudes and prejudices don't help and really is it any wonder that such culturally rich and diverse children can't learn in our stuffy and monocultural schools
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: DeadCrow on August 25, 2014, 05:42:14 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730791/Are-STUPID-Britons-people-IQ-decline.html

Quote
ARE BRITISH TEENAGERS BECOMING LESS INTELLIGENT?

Tests carried out in 1980 and in 2008 showed that the average 14-year-old was two IQ points cleverer in 1980, according to a study published in 2009.

Scientists found that performance dropped the most dramatically in teenagers in the upper half of the intelligence scale, The Telegraph reported.

Brighter teens who took part in the study in 2008 were on average six IQ points less intelligent than their counterparts tested 28 years earlier.

Professor Fynn said the results could be the result of less intelligent youth culture.

He used data gathered in IQ tests on UK children and found that children aged between five and 10 saw their IQs increase by half a point per year over three decades.

'Other studies have shown how pervasive teenage youth culture is, and what we see is parents' influence on IQ slowly diminishing with age,' he said.

'...What we know is that youth culture is now more visually orientated around computer games than they are in terms of reading and holding conversations.'


So it looks like "Evidence suggests that the IQs of people in the UK, Denmark and Australia have declined in the last decade."

Gee, I wonder if this has to do with Europeons getting dumber, or *gasp* IMMIGRATION lowering the average.  What do you think?  :rolleyes:

IQ is stupid.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on August 25, 2014, 08:03:13 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730791/Are-STUPID-Britons-people-IQ-decline.html

Quote
ARE BRITISH TEENAGERS BECOMING LESS INTELLIGENT?

Tests carried out in 1980 and in 2008 showed that the average 14-year-old was two IQ points cleverer in 1980, according to a study published in 2009.

Scientists found that performance dropped the most dramatically in teenagers in the upper half of the intelligence scale, The Telegraph reported.

Brighter teens who took part in the study in 2008 were on average six IQ points less intelligent than their counterparts tested 28 years earlier.

Professor Fynn said the results could be the result of less intelligent youth culture.

He used data gathered in IQ tests on UK children and found that children aged between five and 10 saw their IQs increase by half a point per year over three decades.

'Other studies have shown how pervasive teenage youth culture is, and what we see is parents' influence on IQ slowly diminishing with age,' he said.

'...What we know is that youth culture is now more visually orientated around computer games than they are in terms of reading and holding conversations.'


So it looks like "Evidence suggests that the IQs of people in the UK, Denmark and Australia have declined in the last decade."

Gee, I wonder if this has to do with Europeons getting dumber, or *gasp* IMMIGRATION lowering the average.  What do you think?  :rolleyes:

IQ is stupid.

as a measure of actual intelligance, possibly. But as a standardized test that you can compare and do statistical studies on? Its rock solid.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on August 25, 2014, 09:55:39 PM
Let me guess it's all those racist white Finns holding them back with their mentally projected hate-waves?

fagmins change my name to mental hate-waves
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Obese and Triggered on August 26, 2014, 12:35:28 AM
My fiance submits this through me to the thread with the caption, 'london 2020' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_LIGbj8zHk

I wanna be that dude in the blue sweater.  He's got some serious moves.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on August 26, 2014, 02:04:15 PM
Over here in Finland there's been a minor scandal a-brewin' over PISA test scores. Traditionally Finland has been one of the leading countries (often the number one country in fact) in child test scores. Lately these numbers have been going down fast, strangely as immigration increases and more and more schools have classes that are over half "immigrant" (sand niggers and niggers mostly).

Of course this presents a problem for right thinking leftists, because these kids are largely born in Finland, have access to literally everything Finnish kids have (and more, because they often get personalized tutoring in school because they can't cope otherwise) and still the test scores are plummeting. So aside from the normal "WHERE HAVE WE FAILED THESE LITTLE ANGELS" hand-wringing there are now efforts underway to basically eliminate as many immigrants from PISA tests as possible by tweaking which schools' tests get used etc.

It's hilarious as fuck watching these dumb assholes twist themselves into loops in an effort to avoid the inevitable conclusions.

E: didn't read this yet so I don't know if it's real talk or hilarious hand wringing but some talk on the subject

https://www.jyu.fi/en/news/archive/2014/08/tiedote-2014-08-15-14-56-41-604088

Sweden is having the same problems, so they've changed the grading system again. Maybe that will solve the problem of the growing illiteracy.

Inflating/deflating grades depending on the students ethnic and socio-economic background is also a thing, meaning that a turban A could very well be a honkey C. Combined with affirmative action and a requirement to employ the most qualified applicant it is a truly ingenious way of fostering a generation of Swedes that don't trust the public school system and resent immigrants.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on August 26, 2014, 02:17:05 PM
This is the way the government always solves problems though. It's nothing new.


Inflation too high?  Lets just change the way inflation is calculated!  BAM!  Problem fixed!
Unemployment too high?  Lets just change the definition of what "unemployed" means!   BAM!  Problem fixed!
Math and Science test scores too low?   Lets just make the test easier!  BAM!  Problem fixed!
Not enough women passing the physical requirements for the fire department?  Lets reduce the requirements!  BAM!  Problem fixed!


This is how government "fixes" problems.  This is how they have always done it.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on August 27, 2014, 09:25:32 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11057622/Rotherham-child-sexual-exploitation-Victims-raped-beaten-and-doused-in-petrol-if-they-threatened-to-tell.html
Quote
When in 2010 five Asian men from Rotherham were jailed for grooming teenage girls for sex, it was regarded as a feather in the cap for South Yorkshire Police and the local social services which had doggedly pursued the prosecution.
Asian hm?
Quote
Sentencing Adil Hussain, Razwan Razaq, Mohsin Khan, Umar Razaq, and Zafran Ramzan, the judge described them as “dangerous sexual predators” and said Rotherham would be a safer place for youngsters with them off the streets.
Interesting names there. I guess technically they're in Asia.
Quote
In Rotherham the "majority" of known perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage, the report says, which led to police and council workers "tiptoeing" around the problem.
You don't say.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on August 28, 2014, 04:43:32 AM
The report says the police themselves didn't treat the Asian cases differently to the white ones. It was the police leadership and politicians that refused to accept it was a massive problem or that a certain ethnic group was mainly behind the offences so they could address it.

From the report it seems the police attitude to some cases was disgusting. A police officer suggesting not taking action against groups of paedophiles because of the belief it was all consensual so it didn't matter.

But in Rotherham still over 66% of child sexual exploitation cases committed by an ethnic group just 8% of the population. And still in the media you get people repeating "most paedophiles are white men". This is meaningless when a minority community is getting close, or when narrowed down to a city are the majority of offenders. 7℅ of the population would have to be mega paedophiles to outdo 87.1%...but looking at Rotherham they must be a close second place in the paedophile crime charts.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on August 28, 2014, 04:49:08 AM
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/08/25/britain-is-poorer-than-any-us-state-yes-even-mississippi/

Worse than Mississippi, and bigger pussies too.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on August 28, 2014, 05:31:39 AM
Simmilar... only London is rich. And that is all built on the financial sector and its parasitism of the rest of the UKs workforce.
(http://i.imgur.com/pSeRhaf.png)

Also unsurprised at my area being in the number 3 poor zone, number 1 in England. We are almost back to the 20s and 30s (http://www.oswaldmosley.net/the-political-aims-of-british-union.php), minus an empire.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on August 28, 2014, 05:38:15 AM
But there are no downsides to unchecked immigration and letting in lots of niggers and pakis. No sir.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on August 28, 2014, 05:43:32 AM
Hey, somebody has to man the cotton mills. Oh wait we don't even have them any more.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on August 28, 2014, 05:48:51 AM
Hey, somebody has to man the cotton mills. Oh wait we don't even have them any more.

Well, I mean you sort of do. But they've been converted into affordable urban housing.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on August 28, 2014, 04:08:03 PM
I visited Ireland recently and one of the most refreshing things I saw there was a lack of non-Irish.  Like, until fairly recently, Ireland was a place you emigrated away from.  No one ever wanted to fucking move there.  That's changed now obviously, and they do have immigrants but its totally noticeable how new immigration is when you go and visit.  I drove around the entire coastline from Dublin to Killkenny to Cork to Killarny to Galway and back to Dublin and the only non-Irish person I saw on the entire trip was in fucking Dublin (A huge city).  No joke, I saw almost ZERO "people of color" on the entire trip.

That was fucking refreshing as hell.  GG Ireland  :reagan:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on August 29, 2014, 05:14:58 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2737223/You-t-deport-I-gay-Thug-s-claim-moments-planes-stops-kicked-out.html
Quote
You can't deport me... I am gay: Jamaican thug's plea moments before being put on a plane stops him being kicked out
Alvin Brissett has 18 convictions and was told he must return to Jamaica
Brissett, who arrived in Britain aged 13 used human rights laws to remain
Home Secretary Theresa May signed a deportation order in March 2011
Brissett, 56, told police he was gay as he was approaching Gatwick airport
The father-of-two was returned to a police station for a further hearing
Now the thug, who served seven years for robbery in 1993, is free to remain
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on August 30, 2014, 10:00:03 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2737223/You-t-deport-I-gay-Thug-s-claim-moments-planes-stops-kicked-out.html
Quote
You can't deport me... I am gay: Jamaican thug's plea moments before being put on a plane stops him being kicked out
Alvin Brissett has 18 convictions and was told he must return to Jamaica
Brissett, who arrived in Britain aged 13 used human rights laws to remain
Home Secretary Theresa May signed a deportation order in March 2011
Brissett, 56, told police he was gay as he was approaching Gatwick airport
The father-of-two was returned to a police station for a further hearing
Now the thug, who served seven years for robbery in 1993, is free to remain

A lot like the dude in Norway who got asylum based on being a faggot, then got caught raping ladies two months after.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on September 04, 2014, 08:26:59 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11075380/Woman-beheaded-in-north-London-garden.html

There's a key word missing in this article. I'm wondering what it is.

Also:
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/13/1347.asp
Quote
UK: Jail Time for Revving Engine in a Racist Manner
A motorist in Scotland, UK is fined $238 and sent to jail for two days for the crime of revving his Lotus Esprit in a racist manner.

Lotus EspritScottish motorist Ronnie Hutton, 49, was jailed for two days for the crime of "revving his car in a racist manner" last September. After waiting more than a year to try the case, the Stirling Sheriff court finally convicted Hutton last week of breach of the peace and fined him £150 (US $282).

An off duty officer, Chief Inspector Eoin Jenkins, said Hutton had revved the engine of his Lotus Esprit near two Muslims last year.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on September 04, 2014, 08:43:45 PM
"revving his car in a racist manner"  new username spotted  :allears:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: yowhatupg on September 05, 2014, 09:48:54 AM
How do you even "aggressively" rev the pissy little engine in a Lotus. Guy was probably just trying to take off in 3rd.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 05, 2014, 12:03:05 PM
 I want a car that makes a nniii-nnniiii--nnnIIIIGGGGERRRRR sound as it revs.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on September 05, 2014, 05:52:14 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIGPO90xYG4

 :nixon:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 05, 2014, 05:54:46 PM
Every so often some mong dies doing that.

Darwinism at work.

:hitler:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on September 05, 2014, 07:06:15 PM
Nice try SJW (in reference to the beheadings)
(http://i.imgur.com/9mv7hhD.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 05, 2014, 07:51:40 PM
Are they tweeting from a parallel universe where the races are flipped?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on September 05, 2014, 08:52:26 PM
Are they tweeting from a parallel universe where the races are flipped?

Yeah seriously.   If the news never mentions the persons race, it always, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, means its a black guy.  Do these fuckign retards really think the news is free of SJWism?  What planet do they live on?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on September 05, 2014, 10:38:54 PM
Are they tweeting from a parallel universe where the races are flipped?

Yeah seriously.   If the news never mentions the persons race, it always, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, means its a black guy.  Do these fuckign retards really think the news is free of SJWism?  What planet do they live on?
Uhm, the news and society is full of racism. Especially in the UK, known for it's freedom of hate speech.  :christina:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: [SWOLE]Grode Jar on September 06, 2014, 10:56:17 AM
My DAD and my HUSBAND are becoming women - and I support them both (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/dad-husband-becoming-women---3882689)

(http://i.imgur.com/tTc50ea.png)

Quote
They say every woman marries a man like her father.

But for Lleahan Perry that proved particularly true... because her dad and her husband are both having sex change operations.


Lleahan was 15 when stepfather Stephen confessed he liked cross-dressing.

Three years later the ex-sailor started living as a woman, taking hormones and calling himself Helen.

Supportive Lleahan welcomed the change – pleased her dad was no longer living a lie.

But months later she was stunned when fiancé Christopher Parent revealed he also wanted to live as a woman.

In a three-hour heart-to-heart, Lleahan’s dad helped 22-year-old Christopher come to terms with his feelings.

And now Christopher, called ChiChi by the family, and Helen are both planning to go through gender ­reassignment surgery.

But before having the op, Lleahan, 21, and ChiChi decided to marry. They tied the knot at a ceremony in France this month and are expecting their first baby in November.

Lleahan, born in Piddlehinton, Dorset, but now living in Limoges, France, explains: “It was a beautiful ceremony. We had a massive party with all our friends and family.

“Only a very few people know about ChiChi’s transition so we decided he would dress as a man.

“But he was jealous of my dress. I knew he wanted to wear it.

“He’s much happier now he’s started to come out and dress as his alter ego more often. Our sex life hasn’t suffered at all.

“I’m attracted to men and women so I don’t mind. I just accept everything these days. You are the way you are.”

:tom::tom::tom::tom:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on September 06, 2014, 11:50:50 AM
I still can't tell which one's supposed to be the woman in that picture.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Drain The Swamp And Fill It With Piss on September 06, 2014, 12:02:27 PM
crosspost from the Islam thread.  this makes me so fucking angry there aren't even words for it.  the only silver lining here is i know what the U.S. will look like in a decade or two, and maybe any girls i have will be grown by that point.  and i wont live in an area where pakis, sand-niggers, and other foreign trash decide to ghetto-ize.

Why Did British Police Ignore Pakistani Gangs Abusing 1,400 Rotherham Children? Political Correctness (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerscruton/2014/08/30/why-did-british-police-ignore-pakistani-gangs-raping-rotherham-children-political-correctness/)

Quote
A story of rampant child abuse—ignored and abetted by the police—is emerging out of the British town of Rotherham. Until now, its scale and scope would have been inconceivable in a civilized country.  Its origins, however, lie in something quite ordinary: what one Labour MP called “not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat.”

Imagine the following case. A fourteen-year old girl is taken into care by the social services unit of the town where she lives, because her parents are drug-addicted, and she has been neglected and is not turning up in school. She is one of many, for that is the way in Britain today. And local government entities—Councils—can be ordered by the courts to stand in for parents of neglected children. The Council places the girl in a home, where she is kept with others under supervision from the social services department. The home is regularly visited by young men who try to entice the girls into their cars, so as to give them drugs and alcohol, and then coerce them into sex.

The girl, who is lonely and uncared for, meets a man outside the home, who promises a trip to the cinema and a party with children of her age. She falls into the trap. After she has been raped by a group of five men she is told that, if she says a word to anyone, she will be taken from the home and beaten. When, after the episode is repeated, she threatens to go to the police, she is taken into the countryside, doused in petrol, and told that she is going to be set alight, unless she promises to tell no one of the ordeal.

Social workers tell girls they cannot help them

Meanwhile she must accept weekly abuse, in return for drugs and alcohol. Soon she finds herself being taken to other towns in the area, and hired out for sexual purposes to other men. She is distraught and depressed, and at the point when she can stand it no longer, she goes to the police. She can only stutter a few words, and cannot bring herself to accuse anyone in particular. Her complaint is dismissed on the grounds that any sex involved must have been consensual. The social worker in charge of her case listens to her complaint, but tells her that she cannot act unless the girl identifies her abusers. But when the girl describes them the social worker switches off with a shrug and says that she can do nothing. Her father, his drug habit notwithstanding, has tried to keep contact with his daughter and suspects what is happening. But when he goes to the police, he is arrested for obstruction and charged with wasting police time.

Over the two years of her ordeal the girl makes several attempts on her own life, and eventually ends up abandoned and homeless, without an education and with no prospect of a normal life.

Impossible, you will say, that such a thing could happen in Britain. In fact it is only one of over 1,400 cases, all arising during the course of the last fifteen years in the South Yorkshire town of Rotherham, all involving vulnerable girls either in Council care or inadequately protected by their families from gangs of sexual predators. Almost no arrests have been made, no social workers or police officers have been reprimanded, and until recently the matter was dismissed by all those responsible as a matter of no real significance. Increasing public awareness of the problem, however, led to complaints, triggering a series of official reports. The latest report, from Professor Alexis Jay, former chief inspector of social work in Scotland, gives the truth for the first time, in 153 disturbing pages. One fact stands out above all the horrors detailed in the document, which is that the girl victims were white, and their abusers Pakistani.

Sociologists convinced government that the police are racist

Fifteen years ago, when these crimes were just beginning, the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry into the conduct of the British police was made by Sir William Macpherson a High Court judge. The immediate occasion had been a murder in which the victim was black, the perpetrators white, and the behaviour of the investigating police lax and possibly prejudiced. The report accused the police – not just those involved in the case, but the entire police force of the country – of ‘institutionalised racism’. This piece of sociological newspeak was, at the time, very popular with leftist sociologists. For it made an accusation which could not be refuted by anyone who had the misfortune to be accused of it.

However well you behaved, however scrupulously you treated people of different races and without regard to their ethnic identity or the colour of their skin, you would be guilty of ‘institutionalised racism’, simply on account of the institution to which you belonged and on behalf of which you were acting. Not surprisingly, sociologists and social workers, the vast majority of whom are professionally disposed to believe that middle class society is incurably racist, latched on to the expression. MacPherson too climbed onto the bandwagon since, at the time, it was the easiest and safest way to wash your hands in public, to say that I, at least, am not guilty of the only crime that is universally recognised and everywhere in evidence.

Police more concerned with political correctness than crime

The result of this has been that police forces lean over backwards to avoid the accusation of racism, while social workers will hesitate to intervene in any case in which they could be accused of discriminating against ethnic minorities. Matters are made worse by the rise of militant Islam, which has added to the old crime of racism the new crime of ‘Islamophobia’. No social worker today will risk being accused of this crime. In Rotherham a social worker would be mad, and a police officer barely less so, to set out to investigate cases of suspected sexual abuse, when the perpetrators are Asian Muslims and the victims ethnically English. Best to sweep it under the carpet, find ways of accusing the victims or their parents or the surrounding culture of institutionalised racism, and attending to more urgent matters such as the housing needs of recent immigrants, or the traffic offences committed by those racist middle classes.

Americans too are familiar with this syndrome. Political correctness among sociologists comes from socialist convictions and the tired old theories that produce them. But among ordinary people it comes from fear. The people of Rotherham know that it is unsafe for a girl to take a taxi-ride from someone with Asian features; they know that Pakistani Muslims often do not treat white girls with the respect that they treat girls from their own community. They know, and have known over fifteen years, that there are gangs of predators on the look-out for vulnerable girls, and that the gangs are for the most part Asian young men who see English society not as the community to which they belong, but as a sexual hunting ground. But they dare not express this knowledge, in either words or deed. Still less do they dare to do so if their job is that of social worker or police officer. Let slip the mere hint that Pakistani Muslims are more likely than indigenous Englishmen to commit sexual crimes and you will be branded as a racist and an Islamophobe, to be ostracised in the workplace and put henceforth under observation.
Rotherham Town Hall. (Wikipedia)

Rotherham Town Hall. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

No one will be fired

This would matter less if fear had no consequences. Unfortunately political correctness causes people not merely to disguise their beliefs but to refuse to act on them, to accuse others who confess to them, and in general to go along with policies that have been forced on the British people by minority groups of activists. The intention of the activists is to disrupt and dismantle the old forms of social order. They believe that our society is not just racist, but far too comfortable, far too unequal, far too bound up with fuddy-duddy old ways that are experienced by people at the bottom of society – the working classes, the immigrants, the homeless, the illegals – as oppressive and demeaning. They enthusiastically propagate the doctrines of political correctness as a way of taking revenge on a social order from which they feel alienated.

Ordinary people are so intimidated by this that they repeat the doctrines, like religious mantras which they hope will keep them safe in hostile territory. Hence people in Britain have accepted without resistance the huge transformations that have been inflicted on them over the last thirty years, largely by activists working through the Labour Party. They have accepted immigration policies that have filled our cities with disaffected Muslims, many of whom have now gone to fight against us in Syria and Iraq. They have accepted the growth of Islamic schools in which children are taught to prepare themselves for jihad against the surrounding social order. They have accepted the constant denigration of their country, its institutions and its inherited religion, for the simple reason that these things are theirs and therefore tainted with forbidden loyalties.

And when the truth is expressed at last, nobody is fired, no arrests are made, and the elected Police and Communities Commissioner for Rotherham, although forced to resign from the Labour Party, refuses to resign from his job. After a few weeks all will have been swept under the carpet, and the work of destruction can resume.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 06, 2014, 03:23:44 PM
And still Labour will get voted into government 2015
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Obese and Triggered on September 06, 2014, 04:15:28 PM
Christ this is just awful. You have my condolences on your horrible situation, England.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Drain The Swamp And Fill It With Piss on September 06, 2014, 04:46:17 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/kQTPQVs.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 06, 2014, 04:49:40 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/kQTPQVs.jpg)

revolving door politics, all is faggot

but thatcher is dead, so i can have some inner peace. it reminds me i will likely be alive to celebrate the death of blair to.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on September 06, 2014, 06:44:45 PM
And still Labour will get voted into government 2015
Not when Scotland's gone.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 06, 2014, 07:00:29 PM
And still Labour will get voted into government 2015
Not when Scotland's gone.

Even if it hasn't, actually looks like we'll have a Conservative lead government for better or worse.
http://electionsetc.com/2014/09/05/forecast-update-5-september-2014/#more-427

Both are as bad as each other, but bad in different ways, but I really don't want to see Millipede as PM.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on September 06, 2014, 09:00:33 PM
Milliband cannot sound threatening/strong in any scenario. If the UK were invaded by neo-Nazi Spaniards or something even less threatening than that he'd somehow make a speech to the people which was so petulant that they would surrender immediately.

Also, he looks like a puppet.

Anyway, polls from YouGov say Yes has the lead in Scotland polls. Interesting stuff 2 weeks from poll day.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 06, 2014, 09:39:33 PM
It was quite a bit the other way round a few weeks ago.  Wonder what swayed the electorate. Going to be a close one. I think YouGov tends to overestimate the Labour/Left vote on things though.

Miliband made a stupid move by making threats and probably about to spark some Labour infighting:
Quote
Elsewhere, Labour leader Ed Miliband suggested in an interview with the Scottish Mail on Sunday that manned border guards could be introduced if Scotland voted to go independent.

He told the paper: "If you don't want borders, vote to stay in the United Kingdom."

A spokesman for Mr Miliband added: "The last time I looked there were two sides to the border - and we would be in charge of one of them. It would be up to us, not [First Minister Alex] Salmond, to secure our northern border."

The party later said on Twitter that there was "no Labour 'plan' for border guards in [an] independent Scotland".

 But maybe we will finally have one secure border. :adam:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on September 06, 2014, 10:25:29 PM
YouGov apparently was underestimating Yes voters until this past month when they had a huge increase in the percentage of respondents.

I've heard the Tories might actually be encouraging Scotland to leave because it would secure their rule for another general election period but that seems like stupidity to me.

I've also read that they might delay the general election by a year so Scotland is independent by then and won't have MPs forming a government in independence limbo.

If Scotland joined the EU and therefore Schengen it'll be fun to see all the illegal immigrants coming to England via the Scottish border.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Obese and Triggered on September 06, 2014, 11:44:20 PM
Does an independent Scotland do much to the UK as a whole? There's a pretty big social disruption but is it a financial disaster looming or something like that?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on September 07, 2014, 12:13:26 AM
Scotland is ~8% of the UK population and votes heavily in favor of Labour and the Scottish National Party. They got 41 seats for Labour in the 2010 election. Without those Labour seats the Conservatives would've had a majority government.

What's more, this next election looks contentious. A loss of any Labour seats could tip it in favor of the Conservatives and UKIP could also have more influence on policy due to a more condensed parliament.

I'm interested though in whether they'll cut up more parliamentary districts to account for the loss of seats or whether Parliament will just be smaller.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Obese and Triggered on September 07, 2014, 08:16:43 PM
Thanks!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitters on September 07, 2014, 11:09:27 PM
Is this vote for real?  Because if it's anything other than gambit to negotiate a more federal-style system with London, it's fucking stupid. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bernie Goetz on September 07, 2014, 11:43:45 PM
Is Scotland still pretty much ethnically homogenous? If so, then maybe they should declare independence, wall off their part of the island, and tell the EU to go screw.

The money isn't worth it! Look at the results!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 08, 2014, 12:07:20 AM
Is Scotland still pretty much ethnically homogenous? If so, then maybe they should declare independence, wall off their part of the island, and tell the EU to go screw.

The money isn't worth it! Look at the results!

That's not going to happen though. A liberal/social democrat/civic nationalist government and cries of an aging population? They'll ramp up immigraton and their already growing Middle Eastern and South Asian population.

All I see is William Wallace screaming freeeeedom whilst he  opens a letter on payday loan debt and some salafist cuts off his head.

Guess at least they won't be able to blame the great English Satan for your everything shit at least.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on September 08, 2014, 08:11:10 PM
Disillusioned with Mother England, young Muslims chose martyrdom over living in the decadent West.

Quote
Dozens of British jihadists have become so disillusioned with fighting in Syria that they have contacted the UK begging to come home.

One jihadist, claiming to represent 30 Britons, approached an intermediary to complain of growing despondency among the men in his group. They had gone to fight against President Assad’s regime but were instead engaged primarily in fierce combat with rival rebel groups, he said.

Quote
The man, who cannot be named, contacted researchers from the International Centre for Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence at King’s College London via social media in the past two weeks. He effectively sought amnesty, saying that the group feared long prison terms but would be willing to enrol on a deradicalisation programme and submit to surveillance.

Quote
The British man told researchers: “We came to fight the regime and instead we are involved in gang warfare. It’s not what we came for but if we go back [to Britain] we will go to jail.

“Right now we are being forced to fight — what option do we have?”

 :dunegoonsay:

"Death to the infidel pigs! Death to Amer... wait, what do you mean there's no wi-fi?"

http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/timblair/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/homesick_jihadis_miss_mummy/
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on September 08, 2014, 08:13:21 PM
maybe this is britain's brilliant long term plan - to become so poz that the mudslimes coming into the country become incredibly pozzed too and are unable to wage war
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mad at the Internet on September 08, 2014, 08:19:43 PM
maybe this is britain's brilliant long term plan - to become so poz that the mudslimes coming into the country become incredibly pozzed too and are unable to wage war

You know, I wish that were somehow true in a way. But there's no way I would expect any modern-day government to come up with any type of long-range plan like that when it's pretty clear they don't think any farther than the next election cycle.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on September 08, 2014, 09:25:44 PM
maybe this is britain's brilliant long term plan - to become so poz that the mudslimes coming into the country become incredibly pozzed too and are unable to wage war

Must be that 11 dimensional chess that people say Obama's so good at.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on September 08, 2014, 09:33:40 PM
It would be easier to invite all the Muslims and then just sink the Isles with everybody on them.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on September 09, 2014, 02:26:39 AM
maybe this is britain's brilliant long term plan - to become so poz that the mudslimes coming into the country become incredibly pozzed too and are unable to wage war

I'll see if I can find it, but there is a british group investigating the conflict as it happens so if when there are war crimes trials, those responsible can't just burn everything an claim ignorance about what was going on under their command.

Anyway, the dude from the team said that all the western muslims are pretty much put on desk jobs because they super pozzed with zero warfighting skills.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 09, 2014, 04:06:23 AM
I dunno man,  if you went over there to fight Assad and then ISIS comes knocking to chop off yer head whilst you have to fight a million other little factions as well as the more unified Shia to you'd provably think "fuck it, I'm off back to Bradford".

It'd be like if Orwell healed up in Spain and stayed around for the Communists to kill him for being a " Trotskyite Fascist". (But a least that fucker was English)

But they'd rather fight than go to jail in the UK so I hope that no changes are made after ICSRs reporting so well be 30 pakis down.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on September 10, 2014, 11:12:18 AM
Quote
The teacher (and English graduate) who admits: I’m illiterate - SARAH SMITH blames liberal education dogmas for creating a generation of hopelessly ill-equipped teachers

I joined the profession in 2005 and quit last year, eventually worn down and depressed at seeing a generation of schoolchildren let down by an education system that not only allows woefully ill-prepared teachers like me into the job, but doesn’t pick up on our failings.

For the truth is that I had no idea I had said anything untoward that day. And most of my colleagues — experienced, highly qualified teachers in their 30s and 40s — wouldn’t have known either.

The products of a liberal education system that eschewed the ‘rules’ of the English language for trendy educational methods, we were as bemused as the children we taught. So how on earth are teachers going to deliver the Government’s demanding new school curriculum with its emphasis on grammar?

Alice Phillips, the president of the Girls’ Schools Association, caused uproar last week by admitting that when it comes to grammar, even university-educated English teachers like me are at sea.

Quote
I used to write achieve as ‘acheive’. ‘I before e’ was never my strong suit. Thank heavens the head was there to correct such errors before the reports were sent off to the parents. She was the one we relied on to make sure our spelling mistakes were never discovered.

If only the parents had seen our internal memos and emails — ‘your’ instead of ‘you’re’, missing apostrophes from ‘its’, wrongly added apostrophes in words such as ‘pie’s’. The clangers were horrific.

And then there was the time I prepared a lesson on nutrition and vegetables. Thankfully, a colleague, not one of my pupils, changed ‘brocolli’ to broccoli.

I used to live in fear of the children pulling me up on my spelling. One morning I asked my class for their ideas on a subject, which I would then write on the board.

One boy called out the word ‘simultaneously’. I struggled to spell it twice and in the end had to give up and write ‘at the same time’.

My apparatus cupboard had even been labelled ‘aparratus’ until one of the smarter children in the class piped up: ‘Miss, are you sure that’s spelt right?’ Mrs Phillips blames the problem with teachers’ grammar on the shocking education standards of the past.

She’s right. And I’m afraid the knock-on effect will be felt for generations to come.

The stark truth is that most people educated in a state school in the Seventies and Eighties had little or no grounding in grammar. And many of us have become teachers. Scarred ourselves, we have passed the damage on.

 :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on September 11, 2014, 03:57:51 PM
It's from the Daily Mail you retard it's literally nothing but cover-to-cover THE WORLD'S GONE MAD scaremongering and a pretty good crossword.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on September 11, 2014, 08:40:56 PM
No shit, faggot. Since when is this the decline of the uk as stated in the guardian megathread?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on September 19, 2014, 01:20:45 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/cTzf5UB.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: URANIUM CURES HIPPIES on September 19, 2014, 03:27:57 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/Pz7njmH.gif)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 19, 2014, 03:34:28 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/eVOKfMo.png)

CBA to Photoshop referendum stuff in
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on September 19, 2014, 10:07:59 AM
Whats the goon opinion on Scotland independence?   I could see them going either way.  On one hand, goons are always in favor of anything that increases the size and scope of government.  Bigger is better, and letting Scotland go independent is similar to "states rights" and only racist rethuglicans care about that sort of thing..  But then on the other hand I could see goons arguing that Scotland is totally socialist and the only thing keeping them from a workers utopia is the kkkonservatives living in England.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Slacktivist on September 19, 2014, 11:36:00 AM
Gonna go out on a limb here but "The British are evil" followed by thirty thousand posts about the evils of colonialism throughout the entire history of the Empire.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on September 23, 2014, 07:50:33 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/0QDocrF.png)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11101639/WW1-machine-gun-found-in-mans-garage.html
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on September 23, 2014, 08:00:58 PM
Fucking DESTROYED?????? 

 :razor: :razor: :razor:

That shit is a fucking historical treasure
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on September 23, 2014, 09:23:06 PM
What a fucking shame. How is the first thought not to transport that shit to a museum?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on September 23, 2014, 10:01:01 PM
one less british patriot
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on September 23, 2014, 10:29:09 PM
"His entire collection was removed and destroyed in a controlled explosion."

Jesus wept.

:duckrage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Generation Narcissism on September 23, 2014, 10:43:01 PM
The authorities made a good choice destroying that collection, if you look closely you see not one but two swastikas! Can you imagine if an impressionable young POC saw that and had their feelings hurt! Good riddance to this neo nazi's collection of imperialist propaganda!
    :say:
:madgoon:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on September 23, 2014, 10:48:03 PM
The authorities made a good choice destroying that collection, if you look closely you see not one but two swastikas! Can you imagine if an impressionable young POC saw that and had their feelings hurt! Good riddance to this neo nazi's collection of imperialist propaganda!
    :say:
:madgoon:

"Even worse, the ceiling is covered with the racist, bigoted St. George's cross!"
  :say:
:librage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: URANIUM CURES HIPPIES on September 24, 2014, 05:18:32 AM
What a fucking shame. How is the first thought not to transport that shit to a museum?

This is Britain, not a sane country. You do what NIMBY soccer moms tells you to do.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on September 24, 2014, 08:15:20 AM
Jesus christ. Surely there wasn't one volunteer to go and grab the shit that could be grabbed? I even understand being all crazy about the ordinance (thats 99.9% likely to be deactivated) but most of that shit could have been saved.

I hope its a misread and they just blew up the ordnance. Because they had to transport all that shit anyway.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on September 24, 2014, 11:41:38 PM
there's more shit in decent condition in that picture than there is in the IWM now that it's open after years fucking renovating it
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on September 25, 2014, 03:57:45 AM
there were probably more functional firearms in his collection than in the british army
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on September 26, 2014, 09:43:37 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/GelqrDP.png)
 :lilal:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on September 28, 2014, 02:06:07 PM
Remember how some anti-gay folks were saying sexual liberation and liberalism in general would inevitably next lead to approval of zoophilia and pedophilia? Oh how I laughed at them.

I'm no longer laughing.

If you want fuck your dog go ahead. It's just a fucking dog. Not like they are intelligent or have feelings anyway.

There is a German dog fucking advocacy group.  http://www.zeta-verein.de/en/  :stare:

In fact just go straight to this Vice article: http://www.vice.com/read/bestiality-is-still-legal-in-germany-but-not-for-long?utm_source=vicefbus

Quoted for relevancy: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11119062/Incest-a-fundamental-right-German-committee-says.html
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on September 28, 2014, 08:10:35 PM
it's been decriminalized in Sweden for decades IIRC. When it comes to progressive social policy, there is a slippery slope and it is lined with dog cum.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Mullah Omar on September 28, 2014, 10:28:25 PM
it's been decriminalized in Sweden for decades IIRC. When it comes to progressive social policy, there is a slippery slope and it is lined with dog cum.
It's always Sweden.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on September 29, 2014, 06:11:36 AM
it's been decriminalized in Sweden for decades IIRC. When it comes to progressive social policy, there is a slippery slope and it is lined with dog cum.

No, I don't think it is. Recently a social democratic woman in parliament tried to gather support to make all kinds of incest legal, except father-daughter - that's apparently a step too far. At the same time the retards in the ultra-leftist Feminist party is campaigning for legal intra-family marriage and polygamy, while also opposing legislation AGAINST forced marriage / marriage to minors.

A father gay-marrying his 15 year old son against his will is starting to become a possibility, so if it wasn't already all will one day become (legislated) faggot.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on September 29, 2014, 07:53:20 PM
England: Their whole society is based on a kind of fagdom.   :bunker:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTZQ8nfDALk
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on October 10, 2014, 09:54:14 AM
The lack of self-conciousness displayed here is astounding.

http://www.vice.com/en_se/read/right-wing-girlfriend-josh-surtees-128 (http://www.vice.com/en_se/read/right-wing-girlfriend-josh-surtees-128)

Quote
I discovered that night that, somehow, I had fallen in love with a right-wing lunatic.
Quote
"Some people are just too damaged to be mended," someone said to me. But I didn't want to believe that. I thought I could help her and make her happier, more trusting, less hateful. But I failed.
Quote
I hope somebody has managed to teach her why it’s bad to hold hard right-wing views. I hope she’s discovered how to care.
:say:
 :unparsons:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on October 11, 2014, 08:02:16 PM
Quote
On holiday in Morocco, we were discussing whether a local man had been dishonest with us and she said, "Of course he was lying, he's an Arab."

:nixon:


Quote
So, when it ended, I found myself spending a long summer pining. While the country basked in the euphoria of the Olympic Games, I stalked my tiny flat, haunted by the ghost of that relationship and wishing it were resurrected.


Ahaha, what a weepy faggot. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: freak puke on October 16, 2014, 03:05:02 AM
Quoted for relevancy: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11119062/Incest-a-fundamental-right-German-committee-says.html

Old news, but of course SA has a thread about it (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3667737) and of fucking course there are multiple replies in favor of legalizing incest.

Quote
I mean it's gross or whatever but they're right.


quote:

    “Criminal law is not the appropriate means to preserve a social taboo,” the German Ethics Council said in a statement. “The fundamental right of adult siblings to sexual self-determination is to be weighed more heavily than the abstract idea of protection of the family."


People should do whatever the gently caress they want to do provided it doesn't infringe on anyone else's rights.

Quote
Sounds good to me. Sure they may have some deformed or retarded offspring, but we aren't banning people with matching genetic golden tickets from having sex and producing children with deformities, diseases, or mental illnesses.

Quote
consenting adults having sex? not in my country

Quote
Eh, as gross as it is it seems like the right legal decision.

Quote
If you're American you can't talk about sex because Americans hate sex the most of all countries.

All on the first page.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: bob240 on October 16, 2014, 04:08:04 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/4p3yeTV.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on October 16, 2014, 10:19:50 AM
Follow up headline: Joins ISIS, gets beheaded.

One can dream.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on October 16, 2014, 10:47:11 PM
the world's first case of male female genital mutilation
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on October 26, 2014, 01:42:14 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/4p3yeTV.png)
If it was a nigger too it'd be a perfect 10 in the oppression Olympics
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 30, 2014, 11:52:20 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXZ-ijNAFVM

 :reagan: :reagan: :reagan:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on October 30, 2014, 03:06:36 PM
Cassetteboy videos own
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Drain The Swamp And Fill It With Piss on October 30, 2014, 11:16:09 PM
Quote
Report: Child sexual exploitation now a 'social norm' in parts of Greater Manchester (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/report-child-sexual-exploitation-now-a-social-norm-in-parts-of-greater-manchester-9826816.html)
Pat Hurst
Wednesday 29 October 2014

Sexual exploitation of children has become “normal” in parts of Greater Manchester, according to a report described as “alarming” by Home Secretary Theresa May.

An inquiry, led by MP Ann Coffey, also suggests child sex abuse may have been fuelled by the increased sexualisation of youngsters through explicit music videos and so-called “sexting”, selfies and Instagram.

The independent report from the Labour MP for Stockport was commissioned to see what has changed since the Rochdale case in 2012 when nine Asian men were jailed for grooming girls with alcohol, drugs and gifts before forcing them to have sex with multiple men. Some schoolgirls told Ms Coffey they were regularly approached by men in the street and urged to get into cars with them.

She said: “My observations will make painful reading for those who hoped that Rochdale was an isolated case. This is a real and ongoing problem. I have been concerned about the number of people who have told me that in some neighbourhoods child sexual exploitation had become the new social norm.”

sounds about right
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on October 30, 2014, 11:20:47 PM
yeah well

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a97_1381171141&comments=1
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on November 02, 2014, 12:50:23 PM
https://twitter.com/Odd_Miliband

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on November 03, 2014, 10:05:10 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/11/01/Single-Mothers-Statue-Birmingham-Library

Quote
A £100,000 bronze statue representing in monumental form the modern British family was unveiled outside Birmingham's new central library this week and has been enthusiastically welcomed by some for featuring two single mothers, one heavily pregnant, and no father at all.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on November 04, 2014, 12:02:05 AM
"modern British family" is starting to sound like a euphemism for something really, really unpleasant
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: tender of the rape garden on November 04, 2014, 07:51:09 PM
"modern British family" is starting to sound like a euphemism for something really, really unpleasant

Starting to?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on November 09, 2014, 07:13:00 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11202290/Sharia-law-or-gay-marriage-critics-would-be-branded-extremists-under-Tory-plans-atheists-and-Christians-warn.html

Quote
Anyone who criticises Sharia law or gay marriage could be branded an “extremist” under sweeping new powers planned by the Conservatives to combat terrorism, an alliance of leading atheists and Christians fear.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, unveiled plans last month for so-called Extremism Disruption Orders, which would allow judges to ban people deemed extremists from broadcasting, protesting in certain places or even posting messages on Facebook or Twitter without permission.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on November 09, 2014, 10:31:29 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11202290/Sharia-law-or-gay-marriage-critics-would-be-branded-extremists-under-Tory-plans-atheists-and-Christians-warn.html

Quote
Anyone who criticises Sharia law or gay marriage could be branded an “extremist” under sweeping new powers planned by the Conservatives to combat terrorism, an alliance of leading atheists and Christians fear.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, unveiled plans last month for so-called Extremism Disruption Orders, which would allow judges to ban people deemed extremists from broadcasting, protesting in certain places or even posting messages on Facebook or Twitter without permission.

:adam:
What if you're an advocate of Sharia Law criticizing gay marriage?
 :beepboom:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on November 09, 2014, 10:39:49 AM
Whoever calls you out on it is racist and will have to apologize.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Whig Historian on November 09, 2014, 12:05:50 PM
Muslims are higher up the Oppression Hierarchy than gays, so they can say whatever they want.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on November 10, 2014, 01:07:51 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11202290/Sharia-law-or-gay-marriage-critics-would-be-branded-extremists-under-Tory-plans-atheists-and-Christians-warn.html

Quote
Anyone who criticises Sharia law or gay marriage could be branded an “extremist” under sweeping new powers planned by the Conservatives to combat terrorism, an alliance of leading atheists and Christians fear.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, unveiled plans last month for so-called Extremism Disruption Orders, which would allow judges to ban people deemed extremists from broadcasting, protesting in certain places or even posting messages on Facebook or Twitter without permission.

:adam:
What if you're an advocate of Sharia Law criticizing gay marriage?
 :beepboom:

They declare you Prime Minister.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Travis Touchdown 2.0 on November 12, 2014, 08:01:13 AM
Muslims are higher up the Oppression Hierarchy than gays, so they can say whatever they want.

Stephen Fry learned this the hard way when he expressed concern a little too realtalk-y over the fact that importing a load of Islamic refugees poses a very real acid-based threat to his life

When even the loudest Labour kids start shitlisting you - someone who has overtaken Elton John as the gayest man in England - on Twitter, you know you've officially been knocked the fuck down from the opression ladder. It's happening in the US too though, and gay white guys have been reclassified as "literally the worst"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on November 12, 2014, 07:27:26 PM
That's because trannies replaced gays as the social justice topic du jour.  It's no longer cool to be gay, which explains the significant rise in cock chopping over the past couple of years.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on November 14, 2014, 12:48:47 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/mmwcxnZ.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on November 14, 2014, 01:18:47 AM
The real disgrace is the niggers/sandniggers are maintaining their homes*, and the only white family is the one being tossed out for trashing the place.


*the difference between Africans and Ghetto niggers.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on November 14, 2014, 08:29:56 AM
Lol though at the British definition of a "mansion"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on November 14, 2014, 08:36:50 AM
I don't know which is worse, Somalis getting paid to have kids and sit around in their underwear all day or how every celebrity has a horrible nickname in Britain. Macca, Jezza, Wozza, Mozza


Should've let Dolphy invade
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hair sniffing boner diary on November 21, 2014, 01:43:12 PM
As the events in Ferguson, MO have brought to mind the racial inequality of the police force, let us examine the enlightened ways of our friends across the pond.

Convicted drug users and thieves will be allowed to join police: Rules relaxed in bid to lure minorities - and London is already recruiting criminals  (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2836204/Convicted-drug-users-thieves-allowed-join-police.html)

Quote
It will set out a relaxation of the current rules – which ban anyone with previous convictions, cautions or fines in all but the most exceptional circumstances – on the grounds that it is keeping potentially valuable people [:lolno:]from becoming police officers.
Instead, the college will tell police chiefs they can take on applicants with criminal pasts, as long as they are open about what they did.

So turn that dindu into a did-du, kids, and join the police force!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on November 21, 2014, 02:36:32 PM
As the events in Ferguson, MO have brought to mind the racial inequality of the police force, let us examine the enlightened ways of our friends across the pond.

Convicted drug users and thieves will be allowed to join police: Rules relaxed in bid to lure minorities - and London is already recruiting criminals  (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2836204/Convicted-drug-users-thieves-allowed-join-police.html)

Quote
It will set out a relaxation of the current rules – which ban anyone with previous convictions, cautions or fines in all but the most exceptional circumstances – on the grounds that it is keeping potentially valuable people [:lolno:]from becoming police officers.
Instead, the college will tell police chiefs they can take on applicants with criminal pasts, as long as they are open about what they did.

So turn that dindu into a did-du, kids, and join the police force!

So not only did 1984 come true in the UK, but Clockwork Orange did as well  :allears:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZQOBLqinQk
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on November 21, 2014, 03:42:58 PM
As the events in Ferguson, MO have brought to mind the racial inequality of the police force, let us examine the enlightened ways of our friends across the pond.

Convicted drug users and thieves will be allowed to join police: Rules relaxed in bid to lure minorities - and London is already recruiting criminals  (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2836204/Convicted-drug-users-thieves-allowed-join-police.html)

Quote
It will set out a relaxation of the current rules – which ban anyone with previous convictions, cautions or fines in all but the most exceptional circumstances – on the grounds that it is keeping potentially valuable people [:lolno:]from becoming police officers.
Instead, the college will tell police chiefs they can take on applicants with criminal pasts, as long as they are open about what they did.

So turn that dindu into a did-du, kids, and join the police force!

There's two problems here. But let me start with why this isn't necessarily a terrible idea.

If you want to get a security clearance, that is trusted with national secrets, you can have done some stupid shit in your past. Drugs, petty crime, even been a part of a gange or anti-american organizations. As long as its in the past, and as long as you disclose it, its not an immediate disqualifier. Its a combinationof how far in the past, and how big of a fuck up it was. A felony pretty much is a garranteed turned down. But most lesser crimes, as long as you've cleaned up your act and show signs of staying clean, won't bar you.

Here's how its a terrible idea though:
1) Its the UK, and they are going to fag this up hard core. They will not be at all rigorous in the name of diversity. Because if you deny someone who's been going to dem programs, you will be racist.
2) You are literally promoting people who might have active criminal contacts to be the people who are supposed to stop crime. maybe back in the day you were a look out or a runner. You might still have occasional direct or indirect contact with people from the 'hood who still work with Antonio "Fat Tony" Scarzetti but Fat Tony won't give a shit about the flight paths of drones over Iran. But Fat Tony will be extremely interested in ongoing criminal investigations, as well as witness statements.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on November 22, 2014, 01:18:41 AM
they don't even like to hire people with financial issues or loads of debt because it can be used as leverage or makes them susceptible to bribery (not that I disagree with that policy) and they want to hire the rest of the Choom Gang


yeah, so long as they can pass the written exam, right.... ?  :allears:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on November 23, 2014, 04:00:11 AM
They hire people with misdemeanors for cops here but you gotta be 100% open and any kind of violent crime is a big black mark. They also ask how many times I've smoked pot.


Speaking of, My friend was trying to be a cop and he failed the lie detector test (he's never been arrested ever). They liked him tho so a cop sat him down privately and said they are only hiring minoritiesright now and that's why he failed the lie detector. But to try this other city they'd hire him. And they did. Most unbelievable thing.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on November 30, 2014, 06:55:29 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olmQXDpqmmg
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on November 30, 2014, 10:27:54 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2853638/Koran-read-Prince-Charles-coronation-says-bishop-Critics-attack-proposal-accuse-Church-England-losing-confidence-traditions.html

Quote
Prince Charles’s coronation service should be opened with a reading from the Koran, a senior Church of England bishop said yesterday.

The gesture would be a ‘creative act of accommodation’ to make Muslims feel ‘embraced’ by the nation, Lord Harries of Pentregarth said.

Just declare yourselves an Islamic State already you fucking faggots.
Fucking shameful.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on November 30, 2014, 10:32:43 AM
I've also heard the Church of England will legalize same-sex marriages at some point.
I've heard the same with Finland

State churches have gone from political power to political submission
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on November 30, 2014, 11:42:21 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2853638/Koran-read-Prince-Charles-coronation-says-bishop-Critics-attack-proposal-accuse-Church-England-losing-confidence-traditions.html

Quote
Prince Charles’s coronation service should be opened with a reading from the Koran, a senior Church of England bishop said yesterday.

The gesture would be a ‘creative act of accommodation’ to make Muslims feel ‘embraced’ by the nation, Lord Harries of Pentregarth said.

Just declare yourselves an Islamic State already you fucking faggots.
Fucking shameful.

I will lose whatever respect I didn't even know I had left for the UK if they do this. That's beyond the pale.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on November 30, 2014, 02:07:20 PM
Probably relevant:

Quote
"Getting the PM to choose the right bishop is like a conjuror getting a member of the audience to choose a card. With the Church of England the choice is usually between a knave and a queen."

"The bench of bishops should have a proper balance between those who believe in God and those who don't."

"An atheist clergyman could not continue to draw his stipend, so when they stop believing in God they call themselves 'modernists'."

"Nowadays bishops only wear gaiters at significant religious events like the royal garden party."

"The plans for a new church in South London had places for dispensing orange juice, family planning, and organizing demos, but nowhere to celebrate Holy Communion."

"Theology is a device for helping agnostics to stay within the Church of England."

"The Queen is inseparable from the Church of England. God is an optional extra."

Full episode: http://www.veoh.com/watch/v21040454DwcnkhBy?h1=Yes+Prime+Minister+1.7+-+The+Bishops+Gambit
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Whig Historian on November 30, 2014, 02:36:48 PM
One of the KoE's titles is supposed to be "Defender of the Faith." Not sure how the Koran reading is consistent with that.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on November 30, 2014, 05:25:34 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2853638/Koran-read-Prince-Charles-coronation-says-bishop-Critics-attack-proposal-accuse-Church-England-losing-confidence-traditions.html

Quote
Prince Charles’s coronation service should be opened with a reading from the Koran, a senior Church of England bishop said yesterday.

The gesture would be a ‘creative act of accommodation’ to make Muslims feel ‘embraced’ by the nation, Lord Harries of Pentregarth said.

Just declare yourselves an Islamic State already you fucking faggots.
Fucking shameful.

I will lose whatever respect I didn't even know I had left for the UK if they do this. That's beyond the pale.

Ill watch the patriot or reread to rule the waves to gain a whole bunch of respect for them just to lose it then.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on November 30, 2014, 05:47:25 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/Q6FeiUW.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on November 30, 2014, 06:09:22 PM
Quote
Charles said in 1994 he ‘always felt the Catholic subjects of the sovereign are equally as important as the Anglican ones, as the Protestant ones’.

Likewise, I think that Islamic subjects, or the Hindu subjects, or the Zoroastrian subjects of the sovereign, are of equal and vital importance.’ In 2006 the Prince made known that he wanted a multifaith coronation that would be more ‘focused and telecentric’ than his mother’s in 1953.


One of these things is not like the other you dhimmi faggot, when a British Zoroastrian slams his car into an off-duty soldier and attacks him with a meat cleaver maybe we can start talking about them in the same breath as the Mussulmen

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on November 30, 2014, 06:18:12 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/Q6FeiUW.jpg)

writing that piece up must have been a great time
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: RunForrestRun on December 03, 2014, 07:27:26 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/Q6FeiUW.jpg)

writing that piece up must have been a great time

Just look at the eyes of that boy. He knows what'll be up next schoolday.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Chael P Sonnen on December 03, 2014, 09:48:41 AM
Just think how shitty school must be for him being a known faggot lover and having the last name Doody
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on December 03, 2014, 06:23:50 PM
UK in a nutshell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQPhp8PWKjs

lmbo at "what the hell was that for? he told him to go back to nigeria!"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blasting_asshole on December 04, 2014, 12:12:23 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/mmwcxnZ.jpg)

 :tom:

Meanwhile, in America...

(http://i.imgur.com/e1KmzZM.jpg)

Same price.

Notting Hill, London is pretty identical to Brookline/Cambridge, Mass. Difference being, I'm sure you need to have a management title, in order to be able to afford a flat in West London. I graduated college 3 years ago and can afford an identical flat, in an identical neighborhood, with my semi-entry level salary.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on December 04, 2014, 12:26:36 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/mmwcxnZ.jpg)

 :tom:

Meanwhile, in America...

(http://i.imgur.com/e1KmzZM.jpg)

Same price.

I just did a street view of Notting Hill, London and it look identical to Brookline, Mass, which is where I live for less than a thousand dollars a month.

Can one of our UK posters please explain how one gets 7,000 quid a month for housing benefits? That seems really, really high. Like, even if you've got kids how the hell is that number calculated?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on December 04, 2014, 03:47:07 PM
Short answer? You usually don't, its not at all common. Had a single mother, was constantly getting hired and fired (because she was an idiot) and she's now disabled due to a twisted spine/actual diagnosed mental disorders/brain surgery. She doesn't even get half of that amount and she has two kids, both under the age of 13 living with her. Before she was disabled she had five kids living with her. We had a two bedroom council house on a shit estate.

That's all we deserved, to be honest. Fuck sponging off the system.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on December 04, 2014, 06:16:13 PM
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30327893

A child born with foetal alcohol syndrome is not legally entitled to compensation after her mother drank excessively while pregnant, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

The seven-year-old girl was born with severe brain damage and is now in care.

Lawyers argued her mother had poisoned her foetus but appeal judges ruled she had not committed a criminal offence.

The case was brought by a council in the North West of England, which cannot be named for legal reasons.

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote

It's not about women's rights, it's not about criminalising women”

Neil Sugarman
Solicitor
It had been argued the woman ignored warnings and drank a "grossly excessive" amount of alcohol while pregnant.

She consumed eight cans of strong lager and half a bottle of vodka a day, the court heard.

Three appeal judges at the Court of Appeal had to rule on whether or not the girl was entitled to a payout from the government-funded Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme as a victim of crime.

But Lord Justice Treacy said an "essential ingredient" for a crime to be committed "is the infliction of grievous bodily harm on a person - grievous bodily harm on a foetus will not suffice".

'Hugely important' case
The girl, who cannot be named and was referred to in court as CP, suffers with learning, development, memory and behavioural problems.

BBC News legal correspondent Clive Coleman said the case was significant because it centred on whether or not a foetus was considered a person, independent of its mother.

He said: "This case was hugely important, because campaigners argued that if the Court of Appeal had said it was possible for a mother to commit a crime by poisoning her foetus with excessive alcohol, it would have had the effect of criminalising pregnant women who drank excessively, knowing the dangers of alcohol to their foetus."
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on December 04, 2014, 07:16:40 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/mmwcxnZ.jpg)

 :tom:

Meanwhile, in America...

(http://i.imgur.com/e1KmzZM.jpg)

Same price.

Notting Hill, London is pretty identical to Brookline/Cambridge, Mass. Difference being, I'm sure you need to have a management title, in order to be able to afford a flat in West London. I graduated college 3 years ago and can afford an identical flat, in an identical neighborhood, with my semi-entry level salary.

I don't know that you can compare London to Boston, mostly because no-one gives a fuck about Boston. London's the most important city and economic hub in the world outside of New York and staying in Knightsbridge is basically staying right in the fucking middle of it with everything of importance and prestige within pissing distance. A better comparison might be comparing it to having an apartment overlooking Central Park; it's the swankiest of swanky and all your neighbours are famous or rich as fuck. Yeah, you could buy a manor an hour outside the city for the same price but if you're rich why put up with the commute?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on December 04, 2014, 07:29:19 PM
Can one of our UK posters please explain how one gets 7,000 quid a month for housing benefits? That seems really, really high. Like, even if you've got kids how the hell is that number calculated?

London's fucking weird is why. You basically have old-school zoning with hardly any 'vertical' high density residential building, old people who bought their properties from the government when Thatcher let them in the Eighties (when the place was less salubrious and no-one cared) and poors who have had properties passed down to them, again from back when no-one cared. Jump forward thirty years and the fucking place has exploded with money, the property prices have gone through the roof because the place is so much more important economically now (and because sheiks and billionaire Russians are buying up blocks of it) but the government feels it has a duty to supplement people staying there because if they stepped back and let the market take hold, every single one of these fuckers would be evicted tomorrow as their rent and mortgage payments jumped 600% or some shit. It's thought to be more merciful if this is a gradual process and to slowly squeeze them out. There's also a practicality to it when it comes to workforce and all that shit; you can't just send everyone out into the woods at the same time and expect the trash to still be collected.

A good example for what happened is to watch A Long Good Friday and notice where Bob Hoskins has his boat moored on abandoned quaysides with condemned buildings all over the place; all that shit is Canary Wharf and mega-expensive apartments where IB dicks live and gastropubs now.

(http://i.imgur.com/A2lUOvJ.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/3ai8L2B.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on December 04, 2014, 08:10:42 PM
Sounds similar to San Francisco.   The most expensive real estate in the entire country, intermixed with hobo's and crackheads living in rent controlled flophouses.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on December 07, 2014, 08:30:40 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30327893

A child born with foetal alcohol syndrome is not legally entitled to compensation after her mother drank excessively while pregnant, the Court of Appeal has ruled.


I dunno about you guys but every time I see a header like that I know what the first thing I look for in the arti-

Quote
The case was brought by a council in the North West of England, which cannot be named for legal reasons.


hahaha that's in the second line. Plus they've got comments disabled. They know their audience but shame on them for not indulging us
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on December 07, 2014, 07:43:25 PM
I get that there are limits to legal penalties but seriously
"She consumed eight cans of strong lager and half a bottle of vodka a day, the court heard."
Like wtf, that's a clear disregard for life, and the child was born with that problem, whereas the mother suffers not one bit.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on December 07, 2014, 08:04:16 PM
To modernize the imperialist St. George's Cross, they should replace it with a fat slag drinking a pint of ale in one hand and rocking a cradle of a half Paki baby with the other hand.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: ringer on December 07, 2014, 10:45:38 PM
Actor jailed for 3 years for owning an antique Italian military pistol: http://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/crime/brad-pitt-s-fury-co-star-jailed-for-having-gun-in-hartlepool-home-1-6989312

Quote
Judge Crowson said: “I accept you had no malicious intent with the gun, you are a man with interest of memorabilia of this type.

“But these are very serious offences, and you know the sentences in cases of this nature are particularly draconian unless there are truly exceptional circumstances.

“It is my duty to impose this sentence on you.”

In essence, the judge says, "I was just following orders." Where have we heard that before?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on December 08, 2014, 12:08:10 AM
In essence, the judge says, "I was just following orders." Where have we heard that before?

I wonder... :smalljewrub:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on December 08, 2014, 05:48:11 PM
Because everyone loves student pain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCw6yjJGmCU
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on December 08, 2014, 06:46:29 PM
Because everyone loves student pain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCw6yjJGmCU

Lol

"OH GOD EVERYONE BACK UP HE HAS A TASER!"

Your island is fucked, bro.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a bad guy on December 08, 2014, 10:17:33 PM
Someone take the hysterical women out of the building please.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on December 09, 2014, 02:58:18 AM
Someone take the hysterical women out of the building please.
She needs a mouthful of pepper spray.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on December 09, 2014, 06:35:57 AM
Because everyone loves student pain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCw6yjJGmCU

Hahaha, good on the police. A little bit of CS and they're crying? Fuck off, it stings but it won't kill you.

http://www.channel4.com/news/cs-spray-taser-police-warwick-university-student-protest

"Mr Green said that he had been to hospital last night. "I've spent most of the morning resting. When I woke up I could barely see," he said.

"I'm going to see the doctor again soon. There's a lot of pain in my left eye."

You fucking pussy. Didn't get enough time away from lessons due to protesting, now lets book a hundred doctors appointments!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on December 10, 2014, 12:53:34 PM
Because everyone loves student pain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCw6yjJGmCU

Hahaha, good on the police. A little bit of CS and they're crying? Fuck off, it stings but it won't kill you.

http://www.channel4.com/news/cs-spray-taser-police-warwick-university-student-protest

"Mr Green said that he had been to hospital last night. "I've spent most of the morning resting. When I woke up I could barely see," he said.

"I'm going to see the doctor again soon. There's a lot of pain in my left eye."

You fucking pussy. Didn't get enough time away from lessons due to protesting, now lets book a hundred doctors appointments!
Well it's freeeeeeee so why not? gg uk.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on December 14, 2014, 02:36:59 PM
Some industrious Londoners have been making and installing their own bus-shelter posters.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B41a3QdCcAAq8zz.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B41a3QbCcAAlNXK.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B41bR1MIQAAql8B.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on December 15, 2014, 01:24:27 PM
Make no mention of the police having to start up an operation just to try and stop blacks from killing eachother (operation trident).

Also, maybe this is why, you dumb cunts:

"In June 2010 The Sunday Telegraph, through a Freedom of Information Act request, obtained statistics on accusations of crime broken down by race from the Metropolitan Police Service. The figures showed that the majority of males who were accused of violent crimes in 2009–10 were black. Of the recorded 18,091 such accusations against males, 54 percent accused of street crimes were black; for robbery, 59 percent; and for gun crimes, 67 percent.  Robbery, drug use, and gang violence have been associated with black people since the 1960s.  In the 1980s and 1990s, the police associated robbery with black people. In 1995, the Metropolitan Police commissioner Paul Condon said that the majority of robberies in London were committed by black people"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on December 17, 2014, 12:07:11 PM
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30510137
"First female bishop named as the Reverend Libby Lane"
The best churches are political and go with public sentiment over doctrine!!!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Cantankerous Old Nigger on January 20, 2015, 12:47:36 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

Quote
Caroline Lucas and colleagues regard economic growth as incompatible with protecting the planet and a fulfilling personal life.

The party’s manifesto argues for zero, or even negative growth and falling levels of personal consumption. Britain would be in permanent recession; families would become materially poorer each year. After centuries of growing global connectivity, the Greens want to see greater national self-reliance.
:lilal:

Quote
It will cost somewhere between £240-280 billion a year – more than double the current health budget, and ten times the defence budget. Those costs will be off-set by some reduction to the welfare bill, through the replacement of jobseekers’ allowance.
:facepalm: Where to even begin?

Quote
A Green party would impose “research, education and economic measures” to drive a “transition from diets dominated by meat”. Factory farming would be abolished, and the sale of fur criminalised and shooting banned. Whips and jumps would be banned from horse racing.
:obama:

Quote
nternational aid should be increased by nearly 50 per cent to one per cent of GDP under Green Policy.
Merely being a member of al-Qaeda, the IRA and other currently proscribed terrorist groups will no longer be a criminal offence under Green plans, and instead a Green Government should seek to “address desperate motivations that lie behind many atrocities labelled ‘terrorist’,” the policy book states.
Terrorism, it adds, “is an extremely loaded term. Sometimes governments justify their own terrorist acts by labelling any groups that resist their monopoly of violence 'terrorist’.”
Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines.
:lolno:

This is one of the gooniest things in politics.  :unparsons:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on January 20, 2015, 02:05:14 PM
Is... Is that satire? My retarded uni friends all want to vote for those pricks.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Cantankerous Old Nigger on January 20, 2015, 02:55:00 PM
Destroy all industry
Become poor
Embrace economic ruin!

Says the rich cunt that's never been poor.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on January 20, 2015, 06:12:21 PM
When the new left was coming off of the rails in the 1970s, it turned pretty grimdark.  I forget the name of the book but there was a top selling book that basically said we needed to reject materialism NOW or else we'd be fucked by 2000.  Here it is 2015 and I'm still breathing clean air, drinking clean water, and there's lots of trees and green stuff outside.  It's kind of funny how the left is making the exact same mistakes they made in the 60s and 70s.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on January 20, 2015, 07:41:45 PM
I just like how some leftists actually had the balls to come out and admit they are in favor of shrinking the economy. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on January 20, 2015, 09:25:46 PM
countdown to the inevitable flood of higher-up Green politicans claiming it's all just bullshit a few interns threw together for a conference nobody gives a shit about, but still, "the Green Party plan for Britain" talk about truth in advertising

the whole thing is quote-worthy but still

Quote
“Richer regions do not have the right to use migration controls to protect their privileges from others in the long term,” the party’s policy book states.

A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.
Access to benefits, the right to vote and tax obligations will apply to everyone living on British soil, regardless of passport. The policy book states: “We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.”

 :tuss:  Rich nations don't have the right to use migration controls, and broadcasting to the world that as long as you're happy to sit around collecting gimmedats for five years, you too can be a fog nog someday.

Great plan, really looking forward to seeing the exciting hellscapes a Britain with 400 million people and ten million taxpayers will exhibit
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on January 21, 2015, 06:10:23 AM
When the new left was coming off of the rails in the 1970s, it turned pretty grimdark.  I forget the name of the book but there was a top selling book that basically said we needed to reject materialism NOW or else we'd be fucked by 2000.  Here it is 2015 and I'm still breathing clean air, drinking clean water, and there's lots of trees and green stuff outside.  It's kind of funny how the left is making the exact same mistakes they made in the 60s and 70s.

The difference is that now, anyone genuinely curious can look up actual history and science lessons in 5 seconds instead of spending hours in a library, where your selection is controlled by some hall monitor with too much to do.

Not of course that this matters with England, where common sense has been bred out in favor of barely self aware rabble in council houses.

Bonus track:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/topless-models-on-page-three-dropped-9988831.html

Quote
The Sun drops page 3? No More Page Three hails 'historic moment' amid reports tabloid newspaper has cancelled topless models


Campaigners from No More Page Three are celebrating The Sun's reported decision to stop publishing photographs of topless women.

With no official confirmation from News UK (formerly News International) on Monday night, it was suggested that executives were waiting to assess the response before committing to an absolute position.

The respected media commentator Steve Hewlett told Newsnight that the end of page 3 topless women was a near certainty, while The Times, a News International sister paper, ran a story in Tuesday's newspaper headlined "The Sun has got its top on . . . page 3 covers up after 45 years".

Sources at the News UK group-owned newspaper earlier told The Guardian that the feature has already been quietly dropped, potentially marking the end of a four-decade-long tradition which has been branded a sexist anachronism by campaigners.

"It's an historic moment, but the devil will be in the detail, and there’s still a lot to be done," No More Page Three campaigner Angela Towers told The Independent.

Fat, plain, wrinkled, and haglike women rejoice that your significant other will no longer be able to compare you to a desirable women and perhaps continue to will to live.  Here is a live feed from the coven:

(http://i.imgur.com/lVhuNsP.jpg)

What do British journalists and Christmas trees have in common?
The balls are just for decoration.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on January 21, 2015, 01:45:45 PM
"WOMENS BODIES SHOULD NOT BE SEXUALIZED!"  :madgoon:

later...

"Ugh Stacy why is every guy so interested in video games/gym/hunting and not me?!"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on January 21, 2015, 04:58:18 PM
countdown to the inevitable flood of higher-up Green politicans claiming it's all just bullshit a few interns threw together for a conference nobody gives a shit about, but still, "the Green Party plan for Britain" talk about truth in advertising

the whole thing is quote-worthy but still

Quote
“Richer regions do not have the right to use migration controls to protect their privileges from others in the long term,” the party’s policy book states.

A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.
Access to benefits, the right to vote and tax obligations will apply to everyone living on British soil, regardless of passport. The policy book states: “We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.”

 :tuss:  Rich nations don't have the right to use migration controls, and broadcasting to the world that as long as you're happy to sit around collecting gimmedats for five years, you too can be a fog nog someday.

Great plan, really looking forward to seeing the exciting hellscapes a Britain with 400 million people and ten million taxpayers will exhibit

I talked about PEGIDA with some of my friends and this is the core of their opinion on immigration. They see absolutely nothing wrong with the idea since "we're rich, what does it matter"? And these are all university-level educated people, so not even dum dums who don't care about politics.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on January 21, 2015, 06:57:33 PM
So after two whole days of the entire press and talking heads and every news channels talking about the demise of Page 3, feminists celebrating and The Sun maintaining radio silence on the matter....this is Page 3 in tomorrow's Sun:

https://twitter.com/TheSunNewspaper/status/558031936653111296/photo/1

Top level trolling. They even nailed it with the cheeky wink. The fallout from this should be good.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on January 21, 2015, 07:30:17 PM
on the one hand its something that makes femtards angry but on the other hand "topless women in my newspaper" is pretty morally degenerate and kind of a dumb hill to take a stand on

but i guess britain has been reduced to a motley collection of wretches climbing every dungpile and claiming the moral high ground
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on January 21, 2015, 08:33:36 PM
"topless women in my newspaper" is pretty morally degenerate

Link your Tumblr faggot
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: New Feminist Jihad on January 21, 2015, 08:48:44 PM
"topless women in my newspaper" is pretty morally degenerate

Link your Tumblr faggot
lol u like pizza
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on January 21, 2015, 09:04:47 PM
"topless women in my newspaper" is pretty morally degenerate

Link your Tumblr faggot
lol u like pizza

Careful, damn it, you're gonna throw off our nigger:pizza ratio.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on January 21, 2015, 09:40:34 PM
https://twitter.com/TheSunNewspaper/status/558031936653111296/photo/1

Bloody well would.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on January 21, 2015, 11:45:05 PM
"topless women in my newspaper" is pretty morally degenerate

Link your Tumblr faggot
lol u like pizza

I love pizza.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on January 22, 2015, 01:59:54 PM
I will gladly take a stand for tits. Tits are fantastic.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on January 22, 2015, 06:11:27 PM
"oi cunt, you takin' away the broads tits on page 3? 'ow am i gon' see me mum in the paper?"

oi vey m8
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghost of Vince Foster on February 15, 2015, 03:33:26 PM
"oi cunt, you takin' away the broads tits on page 3? 'ow am i gon' see me mum in the paper?"

oi vey m8

Don't like it, don't buy it.

Don't like tits on page three, don't buy the magazine.

I don't understand why you're putting up your nose in the hair and arguing on the side of puritanical feminism with an air of moral superiority just cause you find a topless woman "distasteful"

The issue isn't what you find distasteful, the issue is authoritarian feminists and their morally-superior holier-than-thou lackeys trying use political pressure to force censorship on a tabloid that they find offensive (due to it being an attractive woman, which creates psychological discomfort for them since they're either born ugly or know they'll never have the dedication to shed the few pounds they need to look remotely attractive)

Feeling threatened over a pair of tits printed in a magazine is reminiscent of the mentality of

:outrage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghost of Vince Foster on February 15, 2015, 04:22:33 PM
on the one hand its something that makes femtards angry but on the other hand "topless women in my newspaper" is pretty morally degenerate and kind of a dumb hill to take a stand on

(https://livinginheavensshadow.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/114749-puritanism-the-haunting-fear-dlan.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 15, 2015, 09:01:22 PM
again, i dont know why you want to take this hill to stand on. its really a pretty base and low thing to be getting excited about. the fact that feminists are utterly wrong in their reasoning still doesn't mean that topless pictures in a newspaper should be considered socially acceptable.

we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on February 16, 2015, 12:58:23 AM
again, i dont know why you want to take this hill to stand on. its really a pretty base and low thing to be getting excited about. the fact that feminists are utterly wrong in their reasoning still doesn't mean that topless pictures in a newspaper should be considered socially acceptable.

we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that
[handwringing intensifies]
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 16, 2015, 01:58:28 AM
oi vey, the king of the manchildren comes to save the day
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Floridian on February 16, 2015, 02:27:39 AM
wimpb why are you still reading newspapers when the internet has been around for 20+ years now
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 16, 2015, 06:09:10 AM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danish Plastic Bigotry on February 16, 2015, 10:32:30 AM
if you think about it it's pretty weird that page 3 titties got protesters out around the same time as Pussy Riot and Femen were basically going "yeaah these are bare breasts!" as their protest


could the Sun have hired a guy to photoshop Putin's unsmiling face next to each pair of tits, and everyone have gone home happy?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 16, 2015, 06:19:33 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

so to sum up, manchildren and feminist spend all their time bitching at each other over degeneracy in their media instead of doing anything worthwhile. i wonder who made the media degenerate?
:jewrub:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 16, 2015, 06:29:28 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

so to sum up, manchildren and feminist spend all their time bitching at each other over degeneracy in their media instead of doing anything worthwhile. i wonder who made the media degenerate?
:jewrub:

please rename yourself to wimpsjw

(http://static1.gamespot.com/uploads/original/986/9866256/2782075-5348157470-10996.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 16, 2015, 06:35:54 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

so to sum up, manchildren and feminist spend all their time bitching at each other over degeneracy in their media instead of doing anything worthwhile. i wonder who made the media degenerate?
:jewrub:

Keep an eye on your kid then, you dumb fuck. Next you'll want all corners padded in case your widdle precious walks into it. Its tit's, they aren't going to make your kid suffer irreversible damage. If you aren't an absolute cunt of a parent your kid spent a while sucking on a tit as a source of nutrition.

But keep going with the "Think of the children because I don't have an actual argument other than being an idiot".
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Floridian on February 16, 2015, 06:39:24 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

so to sum up, manchildren and feminist spend all their time bitching at each other over degeneracy in their media instead of doing anything worthwhile. i wonder who made the media degenerate?
:jewrub:
                            :say:
       :gooksay:

You've heard it here on SS folks, the Jews are responsible for putting tits in newspapers.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on February 16, 2015, 06:48:31 PM
if you think about it it's pretty weird that page 3 titties got protesters out around the same time as Pussy Riot and Femen were basically going "yeaah these are bare breasts!" as their protest


could the Sun have hired a guy to photoshop Putin's unsmiling face next to each pair of tits, and everyone have gone home happy?

It's the type of titties that are problematic.  If page 3 had models with drooping flapjack titties with kneecap sized nipples, they'd be celebrated as empowerment.  However page 3 models have big (not fat) tits, maybe fake, with smallish nipples, and an appealing shape.  Therefore they are problematic and must be banned.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 16, 2015, 07:07:46 PM
Keep an eye on your kid then, you dumb fuck. Next you'll want all corners padded in case your widdle precious walks into it. Its tit's, they aren't going to make your kid suffer irreversible damage. If you aren't an absolute cunt of a parent your kid spent a while sucking on a tit as a source of nutrition.

But keep going with the "Think of the children because I don't have an actual argument other than being an idiot".

exposing children to sexuality at a young age. perfectly normal, perfectly healthy. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on February 16, 2015, 07:17:52 PM
It's Europe: where we have tits on the side of buses and where countries don't grind to a fucking halt for a week because some broad's nipple popped out on TV. We're capable of looking at tits and not wanting to just immediately start jacking off or assuming that some eight year-old seeing a pair is going to turn into a serial rapist on account of it. They're just tits. Tits are not that big of a deal. They're in the paper traditionally for the benefit of workmen and white-van men to look at for ten seconds during their tea breaks; everyone is inured to tits.

Mainland Europe has even laxer standards when it comes to nudity and they have some of the lowest teenage pregnancy rates in the world; turns out not making a big puritanical deal of tits is beneficial.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghost of Vince Foster on February 16, 2015, 07:19:55 PM
so to sum up, manchildren and feminist spend all their time bitching at each other over degeneracy in their media instead of doing anything worthwhile.

You're arguing the feminist side here buddy

Also, would you say my current avatar shouldn't be allow to be printed in a magazine, since it's a horrifyingly tasteless drawing of a pair of tits?

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 16, 2015, 07:29:41 PM
Keep an eye on your kid then, you dumb fuck. Next you'll want all corners padded in case your widdle precious walks into it. Its tit's, they aren't going to make your kid suffer irreversible damage. If you aren't an absolute cunt of a parent your kid spent a while sucking on a tit as a source of nutrition.

But keep going with the "Think of the children because I don't have an actual argument other than being an idiot".

exposing children to sexuality at a young age. perfectly normal, perfectly healthy. :rolleyes:

You know that thing where if everyone you argue with thinks you're an idiot, that you're either on the verge of the breakthrough or you're the idiot? I already know you're not the first one.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghost of Vince Foster on February 16, 2015, 07:31:47 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

I sure was traumatized when I saw a pair of tits in a magazine as a kid  :lolno:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 16, 2015, 07:32:41 PM

You know that thing where if everyone you argue with thinks you're an idiot, that you're either on the verge of the breakthrough or you're the idiot? I already know you're not the first one.
populism is the art of pleasing people with your mouth  :geithner:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 16, 2015, 08:40:25 PM
Keep an eye on your kid then, you dumb fuck. Next you'll want all corners padded in case your widdle precious walks into it. Its tit's, they aren't going to make your kid suffer irreversible damage. If you aren't an absolute cunt of a parent your kid spent a while sucking on a tit as a source of nutrition.

But keep going with the "Think of the children because I don't have an actual argument other than being an idiot".

exposing children to sexuality at a young age. perfectly normal, perfectly healthy. :rolleyes:

stop asking for others to do your own job as a parent.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Danger-Weiner on February 16, 2015, 09:20:53 PM
boobs are supposed to go in kids mouths not in their eyes
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 17, 2015, 04:05:22 AM

You know that thing where if everyone you argue with thinks you're an idiot, that you're either on the verge of the breakthrough or you're the idiot? I already know you're not the first one.
populism is the art of pleasing people with your mouth  :geithner:

I'm going to give you credit at least, I only just realised you're a fagmin and on the goon forums i'd already be banned. Kudos.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghost of Vince Foster on February 17, 2015, 01:03:39 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

(http://i.imgur.com/9GjRXcS.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: VFW on February 17, 2015, 01:07:47 PM
wimpb I'm surprised you're being the hand-wringing wimp but here:

a) Stop demanding everyone change their ways for you and MUH CHILDREN
b) Don't buy the fucking paper with tits, followed by;
c) Read news online, tit free!

A shameful fagmin.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on February 17, 2015, 01:27:15 PM
if you think about it it's pretty weird that page 3 titties got protesters out around the same time as Pussy Riot and Femen were basically going "yeaah these are bare breasts!" as their protest


could the Sun have hired a guy to photoshop Putin's unsmiling face next to each pair of tits, and everyone have gone home happy?

It was really weird when the papers over here where decrying the injustice of Pussy Riot being charged, while giving a thumbs up for Femen activists getting apprehended for being topless around a mosque.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on February 17, 2015, 03:05:14 PM
You've heard it here on SS folks, the Jews are responsible for putting tits in newspapers.

Never thought a dingo eater of all people could manage to make me like Jews.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blasting_asshole on February 17, 2015, 04:52:58 PM
Mainland Europe has even laxer standards when it comes to nudity and they have some of the lowest teenage pregnancy rates in the world; turns out not making a big puritanical deal of tits is beneficial.

Where does mainland Europe stand on the negro per capita index?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on February 17, 2015, 07:01:54 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

(http://i.imgur.com/9GjRXcS.jpg)

you realize they also dont show hardcore porn on primetime tv right? CENSORSHIP

i guess i really am getting old because i dislike seeing society degenerate into a shithole of graffiti, bare skin and shamelessness
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 17, 2015, 07:06:45 PM
NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO OPEN THOSE MAGAZINES AND CHECKING THEM OUT

its like fucking complaining that pay-per-view channels play porn



I was gonna say stop digging but clearly youre just trying to get to your relatives without having to pay for a plane ticket
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on February 17, 2015, 07:37:53 PM
It's Europe: where we have tits on the side of buses and where countries don't grind to a fucking halt for a week because some broad's nipple popped out on TV. We're capable of looking at tits and not wanting to just immediately start jacking off or assuming that some eight year-old seeing a pair is going to turn into a serial rapist on account of it. They're just tits. Tits are not that big of a deal. They're in the paper traditionally for the benefit of workmen and white-van men to look at for ten seconds during their tea breaks; everyone is inured to tits.

Mainland Europe has even laxer standards when it comes to nudity and they have some of the lowest teenage pregnancy rates in the world; turns out not making a big puritanical deal of tits is beneficial.

lolmbo who in the fuck is going to look at Europe for inspiration? Answer: no one. You degenerate faggots had legal child pornography up until the 1990s ffs. Okay yeah you guys are so sexually enlightened with your "lowest teenage pregnancy" rates... protip its because you're a continent of cucks who have desexualized the human body so much everyone would rather play vidya than fuck each.

NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO OPEN THOSE MAGAZINES AND CHECKING THEM OUT

If you don't like it, don't watch it!
If you don't like guns, don't own one!
If you don't like homosexuals, don't be one!
If you don't like child pornography, don't look at it!

lolmbo you have no idea what you're really saying. "its only titties don't be such a pearl-clutcher" no its only creeping  degeneracy. There's nothing wrong with titties, no one (not even wimpb) is saying that, also the newspaper can show whatever the hell it wants because MUH FREEDOMS, but showing some titties in a newspaper is retarded and degen. There's a time and place for them titties and lol if you think its appropriate to have them in a newspaper. It's creeping degeneracy that is the most dangerous but I wouldn't assume a mediawhore like yourself is aware enough to figure it out
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 17, 2015, 08:24:38 PM
Holy slippery slope batman. Straight from "boobs in a newspaper" to "child porn". They're completely similar!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 17, 2015, 09:34:54 PM
I don't buy newspapers with tits in them. It is retarded and moral degeneracy. I also don't like movies or tv shows that feature nudity because 99% of the time its exploitative and not related to the plot and I'd rather not watch that.

I'm still not gonna clutch some fucking pearls and get the vapors because a country halfway around the world has tits in newspapers and say they should stop because THE CHILDREN

:sjw:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: bareback bathhouse sodomy on February 17, 2015, 10:42:07 PM
wimpb I'm surprised you're being the hand-wringing wimp but here:

a) Stop demanding everyone change their ways for you and MUH CHILDREN
b) Don't buy the fucking paper with tits, followed by;
c) Read news online, tit free!

A shameful fagmin.
While I agree, something about suggesting going to the internet to avoid tits is very funny to me.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on February 17, 2015, 11:26:32 PM
I also don't like movies or tv shows that feature nudity because 99% of the time its exploitative

:sjw:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on February 18, 2015, 02:44:35 AM
Reminder that we are not exactly taking about a pillar of informative and educational journalism here. If you let your kids read The Sun, tits will be by far the least brain-damaging thing they are exposed to.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on February 18, 2015, 05:05:26 AM
Is it still creeping degeneracy if the tits have been in the paper every day for the last 45 years? I don't know if it's your country's puritan history that means you've hyper-sexualized tits but they really aren't that big of a deal over here. Tits aren't out there because we're massively sexually-liberated; they're out there because they're just tits - they're not inherently sexual all of the time. Yeah, The Sun has them as titillation but we don't need to sell that paper from the top shelf or under the counter because no-one gives a fuck, not even the kids. They're not a big deal. It's hilarious that something you'll see on every beach on the continent is regarded as some appalling "moral" outrage. You sound like radical Muslims.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 18, 2015, 06:39:23 AM
Fucking "Moral degeneracy".

Get the fuck out, half of what you choke your cock to is hardly moral.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 18, 2015, 08:14:17 AM
Ive never hidden the fact that I'm a fundamentalist :shrug:

I don't like porn, think that wanking it is a sin, etc... and yet I'm still arguing in favor of the Sun and page 3 because I don't believe in forcing my values on others and I realize that the best way for me and everyone to live their lives according to their own set of values is through free speech and the rule of 'my rights end where yours begin' and if people need to watch at tits that are not their wives when they buy the paper, then so be it I'm just not gonna buy that paper or others that put that shit in it. I also realize that no one is perfect and we all have our struggles, so whatever live and let live bro
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on February 18, 2015, 09:53:04 AM
I don't know if it's your country's puritan history

Wimpb is a chink by genes and roofucker by nationality.

So my guess is that being raised in a culture descended from gay for the stay and having a tiny penis, the thought of being naked with a woman triggers him.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on February 18, 2015, 02:10:58 PM
Is it still creeping degeneracy if the tits have been in the paper every day for the last 45 years? I don't know if it's your country's puritan history that means you've hyper-sexualized tits but they really aren't that big of a deal over here. Tits aren't out there because we're massively sexually-liberated; they're out there because they're just tits - they're not inherently sexual all of the time. Yeah, The Sun has them as titillation but we don't need to sell that paper from the top shelf or under the counter because no-one gives a fuck, not even the kids. They're not a big deal. It's hilarious that something you'll see on every beach on the continent is regarded as some appalling "moral" outrage. You sound like radical Muslims.

Fucking "Moral degeneracy".

Get the fuck out, half of what you choke your cock to is hardly moral.

You guys seem to have missed the point where I said that no one gives a shit about Europe's ideas about sex because y'all thought actual child pornography was okay to own and look at, well into the 1990's :geithner:

Regardless, you come in with this dumb ass straw-man, a la SA & tumblr, "wow you guys sure do hate tits" and "they're just titties, you guys sound like radical muslims lol" lmbo seriously go fuck yourselves back to your sexually enlightened, aka cucked, low test, 0.7 births per 1000 citizens society where you can fap to the idea that you're on some high horse of morality because you can look at tits in a fucking newspaper and that us silly Americans are akin to radical muslims because we believe, RIDICULOUSLY ENOUGH I KNOW, that little kids shouldn't be exposed to sex :rolleyes:

Ive never hidden the fact that I'm a fundamentalist :shrug:

I don't like porn, think that wanking it is a sin, etc... and yet I'm still arguing in favor of the Sun and page 3 because I don't believe in forcing my values on others and I realize that the best way for me and everyone to live their lives according to their own set of values is through free speech and the rule of 'my rights end where yours begin' and if people need to watch at tits that are not their wives when they buy the paper, then so be it I'm just not gonna buy that paper or others that put that shit in it. I also realize that no one is perfect and we all have our struggles, so whatever live and let live bro

If the newspaper had something else, let's say oh I dunno  something related to transgendered kids or pro-homosexuality, you'd be all ready to fire bomb their offices and start the Kayak Crusades. You have a weakness of will (" I don't believe in forcing my values on others"), cis scum. I'm legit surprised.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghost of Vince Foster on February 18, 2015, 02:14:34 PM
Is it still creeping degeneracy if the tits have been in the paper every day for the last 45 years? I don't know if it's your country's puritan history that means you've hyper-sexualized tits but they really aren't that big of a deal over here. Tits aren't out there because we're massively sexually-liberated; they're out there because they're just tits - they're not inherently sexual all of the time. Yeah, The Sun has them as titillation but we don't need to sell that paper from the top shelf or under the counter because no-one gives a fuck, not even the kids. They're not a big deal. It's hilarious that something you'll see on every beach on the continent is regarded as some appalling "moral" outrage. You sound like radical Muslims.

:farage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghost of Vince Foster on February 18, 2015, 02:17:23 PM
we live in an era where you can get on any computer and have almost any porn you can dream of within seconds and you're getting all excited about a topless woman in the paper. if i were truly puritanical i'd be arguing for the banning of porn in general. maybe i'm just getting old because i value modesty or some fucking weird whacked out shit like that

Don't buy the fucking paper, you old cunt.

E: I don't want you to have any doubts, I don't buy the paper either. I just think its dumb that because a few femicunts got offended by a picture that the papers tradition should be banned.

lmbo, childless manchild doesnt understand why people might not want their kids to be looking at topless women by turning one page at the local newsagent

(http://i.imgur.com/9GjRXcS.jpg)

you realize they also dont show hardcore porn on primetime tv right? CENSORSHIP

i guess i really am getting old because i dislike seeing society degenerate into a shithole of graffiti, bare skin and shamelessness

I hope you never accidentally come across a beach, all of that exposed bare skin might trigger you  :librage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on February 18, 2015, 02:33:12 PM
If the newspaper had something else, let's say oh I dunno  something related to transgendered kids or pro-homosexuality, you'd be all ready to fire bomb their offices and start the Kayak Crusades. You have a weakness of will (" I don't believe in forcing my values on others"), cis scum. I'm legit surprised.

.... I'm guessing you haven't opened a newspaper in the last 20 years because pro-homosexuality bullshit has been all over the place, and for sure one in the last two years because it's all pro-trans bullshit especially since Orange is the New Black put a public face on one.

Again, I protest with my wallet and I don't give money to organizations that propagate that kind of filth. I also don't believe that my personal values should be used as a rulebook to legislate. I prefer to live in a free society than a society that is conformed to my values through suppression of freedom. I'd much rather people move to my side willingly and those newspapers and those kinds of movies die of their own for lack of consumers.

Capitalism is the best tool against that kind of degeneracy. No market, no tits on page 3.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 18, 2015, 03:14:16 PM
Is it still creeping degeneracy if the tits have been in the paper every day for the last 45 years? I don't know if it's your country's puritan history that means you've hyper-sexualized tits but they really aren't that big of a deal over here. Tits aren't out there because we're massively sexually-liberated; they're out there because they're just tits - they're not inherently sexual all of the time. Yeah, The Sun has them as titillation but we don't need to sell that paper from the top shelf or under the counter because no-one gives a fuck, not even the kids. They're not a big deal. It's hilarious that something you'll see on every beach on the continent is regarded as some appalling "moral" outrage. You sound like radical Muslims.

Fucking "Moral degeneracy".

Get the fuck out, half of what you choke your cock to is hardly moral.

You guys seem to have missed the point where I said that no one gives a shit about Europe's ideas about sex because y'all thought actual child pornography was okay to own and look at, well into the 1990's :geithner:

Regardless, you come in with this dumb ass straw-man, a la SA & tumblr, "wow you guys sure do hate tits" and "they're just titties, you guys sound like radical muslims lol" lmbo seriously go fuck yourselves back to your sexually enlightened, aka cucked, low test, 0.7 births per 1000 citizens society where you can fap to the idea that you're on some high horse of morality because you can look at tits in a fucking newspaper and that us silly Americans are akin to radical muslims because we believe, RIDICULOUSLY ENOUGH I KNOW, that little kids shouldn't be exposed to sex :rolleyes:

Ive never hidden the fact that I'm a fundamentalist :shrug:

I don't like porn, think that wanking it is a sin, etc... and yet I'm still arguing in favor of the Sun and page 3 because I don't believe in forcing my values on others and I realize that the best way for me and everyone to live their lives according to their own set of values is through free speech and the rule of 'my rights end where yours begin' and if people need to watch at tits that are not their wives when they buy the paper, then so be it I'm just not gonna buy that paper or others that put that shit in it. I also realize that no one is perfect and we all have our struggles, so whatever live and let live bro

If the newspaper had something else, let's say oh I dunno  something related to transgendered kids or pro-homosexuality, you'd be all ready to fire bomb their offices and start the Kayak Crusades. You have a weakness of will (" I don't believe in forcing my values on others"), cis scum. I'm legit surprised.

I direct you to my earlier posts about watching your kid and not being a lazy parent.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on February 18, 2015, 03:37:48 PM
Regardless, you come in with this dumb ass straw-man, a la SA & tumblr, "wow you guys sure do hate tits" and "they're just titties, you guys sound like radical muslims lol" lmbo seriously go fuck yourselves back to your sexually enlightened, aka cucked, low test, 0.7 births per 1000 citizens society where you can fap to the idea that you're on some high horse of morality because you can look at tits in a fucking newspaper and that us silly Americans are akin to radical muslims because we believe, RIDICULOUSLY ENOUGH I KNOW, that little kids shouldn't be exposed to sex :rolleyes:

A pair of tits are "sex" now. Jesus Christ.

No wonder you people seldom have passports; how the fuck would you handle going abroad to a beach in pretty much any sunny foreign country you can think of, throwing a frisbee or kicking a ball around in the sand with little Johnny and BANG up rocks three chicks in their twenties who sit down fifteen feet away and get their tits out to sunbathe. Do you scream IGNORE THE WHORES AND THEIR DIRTY PILLOWS, while wrapping his head four or five times in a beachtowel and picking him up and running back to your chalet (Must. Not. Fap.)? DON'T LOOK UNTIL YOU'RE EIGHTEEN, JOHNNY. You wouldn't even need to go to the beach - a hotel pool would have tits aplenty. They're just tits - that's where babies get their milk from. It's not a fucking bukkake party or a Hustler centerfold three knuckles deep.

However, I'll concede the point about Europe's low birth-rate; you're right, despite the best efforts of our Mohammedans, we can't compete with the red, white and blue, all-American Juan and Jamal production line you've got going on over there just yet.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Martin Looter King on February 18, 2015, 04:32:22 PM
Is it still creeping degeneracy if the tits have been in the paper every day for the last 45 years? I don't know if it's your country's puritan history that means you've hyper-sexualized tits but they really aren't that big of a deal over here. Tits aren't out there because we're massively sexually-liberated; they're out there because they're just tits - they're not inherently sexual all of the time. Yeah, The Sun has them as titillation but we don't need to sell that paper from the top shelf or under the counter because no-one gives a fuck, not even the kids. They're not a big deal. It's hilarious that something you'll see on every beach on the continent is regarded as some appalling "moral" outrage. You sound like radical Muslims.

:farage:

Titties and Beer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZVpOg8qHL0
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Renegade Jew on February 18, 2015, 05:10:06 PM
i'm not sure why there's a discussion on whether boobs in newspapers are bad for our chilluns when there are kids as young as 7 who search for p0rn on google. stay classy something senitive
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Al Sharptons merkin crabs on February 18, 2015, 07:33:40 PM
Y'all fight over some of the dumbest shit. Who gives a fuck if some lame brit tabloid has been printing some random topless chick on page 3 for 40 odd years?  :jesse:

Other than radfems and cucks, of course, but fuck them.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on February 18, 2015, 07:46:44 PM
i'm not sure why there's a discussion on whether boobs in newspapers are bad for our chilluns when there are kids as young as 7 who search for p0rn on google. stay classy something senitive

Yeah, seriously, withholding tits from sexually active teens is how goons end up fetishizing child porn anime and Ducktales.



Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on February 18, 2015, 11:46:36 PM
I look at this way:
It one paper with tits on page 3. You can't just have a stack of papers sitting there and have kids exposed to a firm pair. Its also one paper, not every paper. if every single british newpaper had some topless girl showing off the implants she got from NHS, wimpb's hand-wringing might have a point. But its one fucking paper running a picture less racy than a Dutch ad for Orange Juice.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Floridian on February 19, 2015, 05:06:50 AM
Triggered by Tits
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on February 19, 2015, 10:29:37 AM
Wasn't Samantha Fox like 16 when she got her tits out in that paper? And at the same time hardcore pornography was forbidden in England?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Tranny Feet on February 19, 2015, 01:57:30 PM
Wasn't Samantha Fox like 16 when she got her tits out in that paper? And at the same time hardcore pornography was forbidden in England?

As skeezy as that sounds, it's true. 1983. It certainly wouldn't happen now. Regardless, I think it demonstrates just how much tits are regarded as part of the furniture that you could look at those over your morning cornflakes but it took another seventeen years before you could go into a shop and buy actual hardcore porn.

This whole discussion just reminded me of the Tennent's Girls - the best selling beer in Scotland used to have chicks in lingerie on the cans until 1990 or so.

(http://i.imgur.com/5hgDSM4.jpg)

They should bring them back just to see the fucking indignant feminist hilarity it would cause .
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: deeply jewish kind of pervert on February 24, 2015, 10:38:07 AM
Hahahahahaahahahaba this fucking thread mane
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Martin Looter King on March 25, 2015, 10:14:48 PM
UK shitcans one of the most popular shows of all time... Top Gear

Why?  Because Jeremy Clarkson is a mean man who said nigger under his breath once and punched a faggot producer for not bringing his crew a hot meal after a long day shooting like bitch was supposed to.

Apparently the Infowars guys were big into the show.  This video is pretty awesome. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag3GF2sfkiA

EDIT:  Here's a part of his list of wrongthink crimes from the video

(http://i.imgur.com/3tBcPUw.png)

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on March 25, 2015, 11:41:27 PM
The BBC pissing away one of their hottest properties is pretty funny.  I'm pretty sure the UK needs all the money they can get so they can give more benefits to Pakis and North Africans.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Martin Looter King on March 26, 2015, 12:43:21 AM
The BBC pissing away one of their hottest properties is pretty funny.  I'm pretty sure the UK needs all the money they can get so they can give more benefits to Pakis and North Africans.

350 Million viewers worldwide. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on March 26, 2015, 12:51:57 AM
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/21/europe/richard-iii-leicester-coffin/index.html

Quote
Cabinet-maker Michael Ibsen has just put the finishing touches to a coffin; built of highly-polished, honey-colored English oak and yew, it has been a labor of love, pondered over and painstakingly crafted.

Because this isn't any ordinary commission: the casket will be the final resting place of one of Ibsen's distant relatives, Richard III, who died more than 500 years ago.

"It is a unique privilege," says Canadian-born Ibsen, whose DNA was used to establish the identity of the English King, found buried beneath a car parking lot in the city of Leicester in August 2012.

Quote
And while his body last made that trip slung unceremoniously over the back of a horse, this time the journey will be done in style: carried in the coffin made by his great-nephew.

Inside, the smaller bones from his hands and feet will be tucked into linen bags -- each one decorated with a rose, representing the House of York, Richard III's family -- sewn by children from Leicester's King Richard III Infant School.

"I feel very proud because I've never made a bag for a king before," said Xi Chen, who helped make the pouches. "It's like I'm a servant doing something for a King," added his classmate Irfan Sheikh.

:bunker:

or probably more appropriately:
(http://i.imgur.com/SFJs8C6.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on March 26, 2015, 02:09:51 AM
UK shitcans one of the most popular shows of all time... Top Gear

Why?  Because Jeremy Clarkson is a mean man who said nigger under his breath once and punched a faggot producer for not bringing his crew a hot meal after a long day shooting like bitch was supposed to.


The way I heard it he didn't even punch the fucker. That was the initial buzz, but then it turned out the assault was... verbal.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on March 26, 2015, 02:19:01 AM
As an avowed lover of the letters U and Z I've been missing this thread.  Thanks for the updates.

Also clarkson is pretty funny but not as funny as the beeb tossing a bunch of cash down the drain to appease some faggot SJW's
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Hogbox on March 28, 2015, 08:36:36 AM
Quote
BREAKING - Liberal elite declares police state
27-03-15

THE UK government has been overthrown by a liberal elite junta. After Nigel Farage’s exclusion from a television programme and the assassination of Jeremy Clarkson, elections have been suspended and traditional British common sense has been classed as hate speech.

Toynbee said: “We have emerged from our ivory towers and hypocritically large houses to fill the power vacuum left by the downfall of the Chipping Norton set.

“From now on, you think only what our think-pieces tell you to think.”

Resistance leaders Rod Liddle and Peter Hitchens have gone underground using a secret network of national newspapers to continue bravely saying the things they say they are not allowed to say.

David Cameron has barricaded himself inside Downing Street, the Queen is guarded by Royalist forces in Buckingham Palace, and ordinary Britons have defied the coup by being openly racist.

Wayne Hayes of Reading said: “They know our weaknesses. They used our three phobias against us – Islamo, xeno and homo.

“But this afternoon I will share a Facebook post about being proud of British values, and that will be the beginning of their downfall.”
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on March 29, 2015, 05:59:20 AM
UK shitcans one of the most popular shows of all time... Top Gear

Why?  Because Jeremy Clarkson is a mean man who said nigger under his breath once and punched a faggot producer for not bringing his crew a hot meal after a long day shooting like bitch was supposed to.


The way I heard it he didn't even punch the fucker. That was the initial buzz, but then it turned out the assault was... verbal.  :facepalm:

Nah, he punched the guy. The guy then took himself to the emergency room (for a fucking cut lip, the cunt) and then Clarkson went and apologised to the crew and said he shouldn't have done it. Nobody would have found out if he didn't admit to it.

The UK, everyone.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hottopicmichaelmoore on March 30, 2015, 06:25:10 PM
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/jeremy-clarksons-backstage-top-gear-live-demands-included-20-bottles-of-wine-and-champagne-steak-knives-and-scrabble-10143657.html
Okay so apparently huge international celebrities are high-maintenance.  :jesse:

But the reason I'm linking this is the "25 more obnoxious lines" slideshow, which demonstrates why REAL PEOPLE LIKE HIM.


On the Renault Clio V6 handling bends: "In typical French fashion it just gives up! A bit like the French did with the Germans."

On public sector workers in 2011: “I’d have them all shot. I would take them outside and execute them in front of their families.”

"I’m sorry, but having an Aston Martin DB9 on the drive and not driving it is a bit like having Keira Knightley in your bed and sleeping on the couch. If you’ve got even half a scrotum it’s not going to happen."

"Britain’s nuclear submarines have been deemed unsafe… probably because they don’t have wheel-chair access."

“If we are being honest HIV is a pathetic virus, it can only live in the air for 6 seconds and it does what ebola does to you in 10 days in 10 years.”

On the Lotus Elise: “This car is more fun than the entire french air force crashing into a firework factory.”

On actress Sarah Jessica Parker: “People think ‘oh she must be pretty’. She isn’t – she looks like a boiled horse."

"The problem is that television executives have got it into their heads that if one presenter on a show is a blonde-haired, blue-eyed heterosexual boy, the other must be a black Muslim lesbian."

 :reagan:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on March 30, 2015, 07:55:43 PM
I wanted to see the rest and honestly the first one stuck out at me more than anything else.

"Short people. When you've finished using a car, put the f**king seat back, so humans can use it afterwards," he posted on Twitter. Offensively."

Just in case people didn't quite get that he was insulting them.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on March 31, 2015, 04:09:15 AM
I wanted to see the rest and honestly the first one stuck out at me more than anything else.

"Short people. When you've finished using a car, put the f**king seat back, so humans can use it afterwards," he posted on Twitter. Offensively."

Just in case people didn't quite get that he was insulting them.
If that offends you haha you're a short fag
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on March 31, 2015, 12:00:17 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html

Quote
The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

Nuke Britain now.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on March 31, 2015, 01:51:18 PM
I get that Clarkson was always going to draw a crowd of SJWs baying for his blood the moment he slipped up, and I know you guys hate DEMLIBERALZ but dude showed up and got violent with another member of staff. That's not how grown-ups behave at work. It was right to sack him.

I mean, if I was his boss I'd fuckin' cover it up like nobody's business to keep that sweet international cash coming in, but really, firing the big dumb manbaby motherfucker was the correct thing to do. Just a dumb correct thing, if you get me.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 31, 2015, 01:54:34 PM
lenny, a shameful faggot by any other name
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on March 31, 2015, 01:58:45 PM
I get that Clarkson was always going to draw a crowd of SJWs baying for his blood the moment he slipped up, and I know you guys hate DEMLIBERALZ but dude showed up and got violent with another member of staff. That's not how grown-ups behave at work. It was right to sack him.

I mean, if I was his boss I'd fuckin' cover it up like nobody's business to keep that sweet international cash coming in, but really, firing the big dumb manbaby motherfucker was the correct thing to do. Just a dumb correct thing, if you get me.

Sometimes a face needs a punchin'
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: [L.N.E]Giblets on March 31, 2015, 02:10:14 PM
lenny, a shameful faggot by any other name

Sorry dogg. I know when your [totally not fictitious] intern doesn't bring you your juice box you PM GAPO instanter and then challenge that feckless motherfucker to an epic 45 second muay thai battle, but people at jobs that actually exist tend not to handle their business that way.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on March 31, 2015, 02:20:56 PM
I wanted to see the rest and honestly the first one stuck out at me more than anything else.

"Short people. When you've finished using a car, put the f**king seat back, so humans can use it afterwards," he posted on Twitter. Offensively."

Just in case people didn't quite get that he was insulting them.
If that offends you haha you're a short fag

If you read that and assumed that I meant that I was offended by that, you are wrong.

If you are just reading that and laughing at people who might be offended in general, fair enough.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on March 31, 2015, 02:57:07 PM
People didn't seem to mind when he punched Piers Morgan.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on March 31, 2015, 03:41:16 PM
People didn't seem to mind when he punched Piers Morgan.

I get that Clarkson was always going to draw a crowd of SJWs baying for his blood the moment he slipped up, and I know you guys hate DEMLIBERALZ but dude showed up and got violent with another member of staff. That's not how grown-ups behave at work. It was right to sack him.

I mean, if I was his boss I'd fuckin' cover it up like nobody's business to keep that sweet international cash coming in, but really, firing the big dumb manbaby motherfucker was the correct thing to do. Just a dumb correct thing, if you get me.

Sometimes a face needs a punchin'
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on March 31, 2015, 04:33:09 PM
I wanted to see the rest and honestly the first one stuck out at me more than anything else.

"Short people. When you've finished using a car, put the f**king seat back, so humans can use it afterwards," he posted on Twitter. Offensively."

Just in case people didn't quite get that he was insulting them.
If that offends you haha you're a short fag

If you read that and assumed that I meant that I was offended by that, you are wrong.

If you are just reading that and laughing at people who might be offended in general, fair enough.
It's the second thing posting bro. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on March 31, 2015, 06:15:28 PM
a lazy shameful faggot*
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on March 31, 2015, 08:35:17 PM
the decline of the UK: the SJW BBC versus the aging manchild

whoever wins, the UK loses
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Martin Looter King on April 04, 2015, 09:54:26 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlT7Ku_UDoc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fGKF7vE2ZE

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on April 05, 2015, 09:08:03 AM
Quote
A TEENAGER repeatedly punched a paramedic after the crew caught him about to have sex with a girl in the back of an ambulance that was preparing to take a poorly 92-year-old man to hospital.


A TEENAGER repeatedly punched a paramedic after the crew caught him about to have sex with a girl in the back of an ambulance that was preparing to take a poorly 92-year-old man to hospital.

The shocked ambulance crew told him to get out because they needed to get the pensioner to hospital but he callously and brazenly replied: "What's your problem? We are just trying to have sex."

The teen went on to punch a paramedic three times in the face while the pensioner was being carried to the vehicle.

Kyle Hargreaves, 18, of Copse Close, Immingham, admitted assaulting paramedic Michael Newman and breaching his Antisocial Behaviour Order by using threatening behaviour towards him on February 15.

Quote

Grimsby Crown Court heard that an ambulance crew went to the home of a 92-year-old man, who was suffering chest pains, just before 10.15pm.

One of the crew opened the back doors of the ambulance to take a carry chair out before going back inside the pensioner's home in Dixon Avenue, Grimsby.

The doors were left open in readiness – which is normal practice – but in the few minutes that the crew were carrying the pensioner out of his home, Hargreaves and a girl sneaked inside the back of the ambulance.

He was found lying on a stretcher with a girl on top of him.

They were kissing each other and seemed to have been drinking but were not actually having sex – although it seemed that would have happened next.

Paramedic Mr Newman asked them what they were doing and told them to get out of the ambulance because the crew needed to get the pensioner to hospital.

Hargreaves asked: "What's your problem? We are just trying to have sex."

Quote
He punched Mr Newman in the face three times while the pensioner was still in the carry chair and was being protected by an ambulance technician and the patient's son, who had arrived on the scene.

The panic button on the crew's radios was used to alert the police, who arrived about 15 minutes later.

The girl who was with Hargreaves bit ambulance technician William Heron on his hand.

Mr Newman suffered a huge black eye, a cut to his nose and a nose bleed.

Hargreaves spat saliva and blood into Mr Newman's face.

Quote
Craig Lowe, mitigating, said Hargreaves had a long history of offending and he faced longer custodial sentences if he did not tackle his drinking.

Hargreaves was locked up for a total of two years and eight months.


http://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/Thug-trying-sex-ambulance-punched-paramedic/story-26277811-detail/story.html#ixzz3WRKj97iC

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on April 09, 2015, 09:39:55 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/ByZdo5P.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on April 10, 2015, 03:47:43 AM
VOTE NIGGER!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 11, 2015, 08:35:12 AM
brb voting UKIP.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on April 11, 2015, 09:42:37 AM
Capitalizing "black", the sure sign of a diseased mind.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on April 16, 2015, 08:32:26 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/11540653/James-May-denounces-Top-Gear-fans-who-sent-Sue-Perkins-death-threats.html
(http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03261/Have_I_got_News_su_3261571b.jpg)
Apparently a lesbian feminist is hosting top gear.
maybe a hoax, spread it anyway
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 17, 2015, 02:38:07 PM
That actually made print over here. I really enjoyed the massive bold "FORCED TO QUIT TWITTER" they posted and then in small print they showed the quote. "I'm off twitter for a bit".

Yup, that's forced off of twitter.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on July 02, 2015, 03:32:44 PM
Teen Girl Dies After Not Going To Bathroom For 8 Weeks Due To Phobia Of Toilets
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/teenage-girl-dies-of-heart-attack-after-not-going-to-the-toilet-for-eight-weeks-10357533.html
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2015/07/02/teen-girl-toilet-phobia/

Quote
Not going to the bathroom left Titterington with a compressed chest cavity and displaced organs.


“I could see that her abdomen was grossly extended,” paramedic Lee Taylor told The Independent. “Her lower ribs had been pushed out further than her pubic bone – I was shocked.”

Pathologist Dr. Amanda Jeffery told The Independent that the teen girl’s autopsy showed that she had a “massive extension of the large bowel.”

:umberto:

Quote
Dr. Alistair James – who prescribed Titterington laxatives without examining her abdomen — says the girl’s death could have been avoided.

“Had I done so, we would be having a different conversation,” James told The Independent. “Her death could have been avoided with the right treatment at the right point.”

Oh yes her death could've been avoided had she not gone to a rubber stamping nationalized healthcare system

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on July 02, 2015, 09:43:44 PM
Couldn't she have just gotten in touch with her wild side and just shit in the woods or something?

If you were holding it for weeks you could have just as easily found a secluded place to shit and be done with it.

I dunno.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on July 02, 2015, 10:44:50 PM
You'd almost expect someone that autistic to be saving them in coffee cans labeled with the date and time written on them  :jesse:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on July 03, 2015, 12:09:39 AM
You'd almost expect someone that autistic to be saving them in coffee cans labeled with the date and time written on them  :jesse:

Or at least poopsocking
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ableist Enabler on July 03, 2015, 03:06:49 PM
Quote
Oh yes her death could've been avoided had she not gone to a rubber stamping nationalized healthcare system

Whilst the NHS, from personal experience, is very much prone to rubber stamping, box ticking and generally treating any patient as a statistic, I think the basic problem here was legal. Because the girl was 16 she was deemed to be old enough to refuse medical treatment unless a court ruled that she lacked capacity:
http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/consent-to-treatment/Pages/children-under-16.aspx (http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/consent-to-treatment/Pages/children-under-16.aspx)

Dealing with the situation would ultimately have required a court order. That might have been obtained quickly if she was in intensive care with an acute illness that clearly needed treating right away, but she was at home with constipation, and was hiding exactly how bad it was.

You could say its the fault of the law being indulgent towards people who clearly are incapable of making decisions for themselves, though, in the same way that tumblr and SA are overrun with people who should probably be committed to mental hospitals for their own good because it isn't legally so easy to do that as it once was.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on July 04, 2015, 02:20:17 AM
how do you physically prevent yourself from pooping for 2 months? Even shittons of immodium wouldn't stop that itd have to be high grade opiates.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on July 04, 2015, 04:07:46 AM
how do you physically prevent yourself from pooping for 2 months? Even shittons of immodium wouldn't stop that itd have to be high grade opiates.
Yeah short of daily heroin that's some dedication and commitment there.  Not to mention sphincter muscles.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on July 04, 2015, 04:52:30 AM
Probably trying to create the Poopendiamond ricky posted about in TNE many moons ago.

Anyone still got that mot? (Thanks again for deleting all of TNE at once cause you had a Sad, clancy  :hank: )
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on July 04, 2015, 09:41:56 AM
how do you physically prevent yourself from pooping for 2 months? Even shittons of immodium wouldn't stop that itd have to be high grade opiates.

Well after holding it in for like 3 days the body takes care of the rest of the work.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on July 04, 2015, 10:31:58 AM
I don't think I could get to two days never mind two months.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on July 04, 2015, 10:36:59 AM
Who doesn't love to poop?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on July 04, 2015, 06:08:17 PM
I've pooped twice today! And goddamn I'll do it again after all the hot dogs, hamburgers and beer I'm drinking this afternoon!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on July 04, 2015, 09:01:37 PM
I've pooped twice today! And goddamn I'll do it again after all the hot dogs, hamburgers and beer I'm drinking this afternoon!

I ate something like a cup of pecans this afternoon while I was getting ready to cook large piles of meat (which will be eaten shortly). That's like 10 or 11 grams of fiber right there. That pile of meat has itself a trailblazing guide.

What I want to know is what the hell was that girl eating while she stopped up the works for that long?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on July 04, 2015, 10:24:01 PM
how do you physically prevent yourself from pooping for 2 months? Even shittons of immodium wouldn't stop that itd have to be high grade opiates.

Well after holding it in for like 3 days the body takes care of the rest of the work.

After a couple of days, shit in your colon gets impacted, and you couldn't voluntarily shit even if you wanted to.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on July 04, 2015, 10:29:55 PM
how the fuck do you even prevent yourself from going to the bathroom for two hours?

you people have really fucked up unbalanced diets if you don't reguarly have protein and creatine shits go to the bathroom for couple of days. or even 24 hours and you haven't been fasting.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on July 04, 2015, 11:26:18 PM
how the fuck do you even prevent yourself from going to the bathroom for two hours?

you people have really fucked up unbalanced diets if you don't reguarly have protein and creatine shits go to the bathroom for couple of days. or even 24 hours and you haven't been fasting.
Lol if you shit every two hours something is wrong with yu see a doctor
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on July 04, 2015, 11:27:17 PM

how the fuck do you even prevent yourself from going to the bathroom for two hours?

you people have really fucked up unbalanced diets if you don't reguarly have protein and creatine shits go to the bathroom for couple of days. or even 24 hours and you haven't been fasting.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on July 04, 2015, 11:36:40 PM
how the fuck do you even prevent yourself from going to the bathroom for two hours?

you people have really fucked up unbalanced diets if you don't reguarly have protein and creatine shits go to the bathroom for couple of days. or even 24 hours and you haven't been fasting.
Lol if you shit every two hours something is wrong with yu see a doctor

for fuck's sake

:facepalm:

2 hours once you start feeling the need to go to the bathroom, not any two hours of the day fucking context bro
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Immortal Machine Entity on July 05, 2015, 12:53:32 AM
https://twitter.com/ClarkeMicah/status/614716089906393088  :nixon:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Hogbox on July 05, 2015, 02:20:17 AM
how the fuck do you even prevent yourself from going to the bathroom for two hours?

Cis scum eats so many burgers he shits 8 times per day. Shameful.

Also, shitposting:
(http://i.imgur.com/HGVWASo.png)


There's a connection here ... if only I could SEE it!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on July 06, 2015, 03:20:36 AM
https://twitter.com/ClarkeMicah/status/614716089906393088  :nixon:

Except that what's making him all emo is because the Tories took power instead of Labor.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on July 21, 2015, 10:09:53 PM
almost a third of all deaths in the UK and Wales are.... abortions

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/06/06/hold-for-rk-abortions-count-for-27-per-cent-of-all-deaths-in-england/

:stare:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hottopicmichaelmoore on July 21, 2015, 10:50:35 PM
US deaths last year (not including abortions): 2.6 million
US abortions in 2011: 1.1 million

Higher than 27% in the UK, but I guarantee our rate is lower when you compare apples to apples because blacks have a way higher rate and we have way more of them.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on July 22, 2015, 01:15:30 PM
We have more gypsies.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ableist Enabler on July 22, 2015, 01:46:24 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3169585/Teaching-assistant-stabbed-death-going-sell-laptop-man-met-Gumtree.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3169585/Teaching-assistant-stabbed-death-going-sell-laptop-man-met-Gumtree.html)

Black guy advertises laptop for sale on Gumtree, and goes to meet "buyer", with friend. Is jumped by three other guys, who try and steal the laptop. He and his friend manage to hang on to it and get back to their car, whereupon he calls another friend, the three of them head out to look for the robbers. He finds the people who he thinks are responsible, but gets stabbed to death in the fight.

And all of this is spun as "Tragic death in mugging", not "tragic death in bungled revenge attack after mugging by man who wouldn't just drive off and phone the cops." He a good boy, he dindu nuffin, he got good judgement...
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on July 22, 2015, 06:55:11 PM
M Night Shamalyan Twist:
He was selling a laptop that he'd stolen.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on July 23, 2015, 09:30:29 AM
Related to article titles not telling even close to the full story:
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/crime-law/police-shooting-death-of-georgia-mom-draws-nationa/nmzqx/

A sweet mother of two innocently gunned down?

Well, it ends up she was actually a heroin (and every other drug when it wasn't available) junky, had just sent the police on a high speed chase while on atleast heroin, and was trying to ram police cars while shot.
http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2011-10-02/story/troubling-details-georgia-police-shooting
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on July 23, 2015, 04:14:29 PM
We have more gypsies.

Gypsies don't abort unwanted kids, they sell them on the black market.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: RunForrestRun on July 23, 2015, 05:44:34 PM
Black guy advertises laptop for sale on Gumtree, and goes to meet "buyer", with friend.

I never met someone from an online transaction and can't imagine why anyone would. It seems like a prime opportunity to get robbed by a junkie. Shipping is cheap, so are payment methods online. Never had a problem. When a deal is too good to be true, it probably is.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aran on July 23, 2015, 05:47:30 PM
Black guy advertises laptop for sale on Gumtree, and goes to meet "buyer", with friend.

I never met someone from an online transaction and can't imagine why anyone would. It seems like a prime opportunity to get robbed by a junkie. Shipping is cheap, so are payment methods online. Never had a problem. When a deal is too good to be true, it probably is.

I have, never had a problem. Meet in public, be prepared for things to go sideways, etc.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on July 24, 2015, 01:54:56 AM
Black guy advertises laptop for sale on Gumtree, and goes to meet "buyer", with friend.

I never met someone from an online transaction and can't imagine why anyone would. It seems like a prime opportunity to get robbed by a junkie. Shipping is cheap, so are payment methods online. Never had a problem. When a deal is too good to be true, it probably is.

You don't risk being robbed, but you do risk being scammed. In civilized (white) countries, the latter is typically a much bigger risk.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on July 24, 2015, 04:02:00 AM
Shit, when I cut down the trees behind my house we ended up selling all the wood to locals in the area. Just don't buy electronics from black dudes because they're going to be stolen. Anything else is usually fine.

I get that there are obvious exceptions to that
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on July 24, 2015, 06:32:24 AM
I've bought a whole bunch of stuff as online transactions and in person, mostly photographic equipment. Met people at their home, too etc. Always been a pleasant experience.

Then again, we have next to no niggers  :smug:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on July 24, 2015, 07:19:24 AM
If you can't instantly detect niggervoice on the phone or even in an email I feel for your u son.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blakks are not very cool on August 08, 2015, 09:05:13 PM
http://europe.newsweek.com/migrants-suffering-gangrene-scabies-calais-camps-331338

Quote
Gangrene, scabies, severe diarrhoea and breathing difficulties are affecting migrants, including children, who are camped out in squalid living conditions in Calais, according to charities working in the area.

Pregnant women and unaccompanied children are also becoming an increasingly common sight at the makeshift camp known as 'The Jungle' where many of the migrants live.

Leigh Daynes, Executive Director of the health charity Doctors of the World UK, which provides humanitarian support in Calais, has visited the camp several times so far this year. He told Newsweek of his "complete shock" at meeting a group of 10-year-old boys from Syria, living in a ditch and suffering from scabies— a contagious skin condition caused by tiny mites that burrow into the skin. He says his colleagues have also come across cases of gangrene, breathing difficulties and severe cases of diarrhoea.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on August 09, 2015, 12:07:27 AM
 :goonette: Clearly the solution is to let them go into Britain so they can start sucking up benefits right away!

I feel sorry for these kids but lol at pregnant women.  They probably got knocked up in Calais while waiting to get into the Gibs Promiseland.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on August 09, 2015, 06:11:56 AM
If the living conditions are so squalid, why don't some of them just leave? Why do they HAVE to get into Britain?

Also I presume they didn't contract scabies and gangrene just from living in that camp. Most of them probably suffered from various diseases even when they started off in Africa.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: who cares? on August 09, 2015, 11:15:51 AM
The problem is that the countries in Europe, for example Greece and Italy that the migrant first must pass through does not fingerprint them like they are supposed to do according to the Dublin convention.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on August 09, 2015, 12:58:44 PM
At least the odd Dutchman is slowing them down by dropping them off in another part of France and saying it is England:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckAu-k6E9qc
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on August 09, 2015, 01:45:33 PM
Just bomb the fucking camp. Would probably save the UK money in the long run anyway, considering all the benefits they won't be paying out.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: bareback bathhouse sodomy on August 09, 2015, 02:31:53 PM
Anders Breivik, Darren Wilson George Zimmerman could fix the situation quickly enough.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on August 09, 2015, 05:24:47 PM
Anders Breivik, Darren Wilson, George Zimmerman or Ben Garrison could fix the situation quickly enough.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on August 10, 2015, 02:13:13 AM
Anders Breivik, Darren Wilson, George Zimmerman or Ben Garrison could fix the situation quickly enough.

A fantastic four i'd actually watch.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 10, 2015, 03:21:42 AM
Just bomb the fucking camp. Would probably save the UK money in the long run anyway, considering all the benefits they won't be paying out.

you'd have to beg america for the bombs though
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on August 10, 2015, 03:18:11 PM
Just bomb the fucking camp. Would probably save the UK money in the long run anyway, considering all the benefits they won't be paying out.

you'd have to beg america for the bombs though

Unlike those Asians who got given the big bombs for free eh?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 10, 2015, 07:43:42 PM
well im not japanese, but i wouldnt be shittalking japan when you're british considering how badly they owned you until america saved the day
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on August 10, 2015, 08:17:19 PM
well im not japanese, but i wouldnt be shittalking japan when you're british considering how badly they owned you until america saved the day

You're not really American either are you? I just figured you could switch nationalities with how hard you're trying to be  :jesse:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on August 10, 2015, 08:36:00 PM
well im not japanese, but i wouldnt be shittalking japan when you're british considering how badly they owned you until america saved the day

Your not really American either are you? I just figured you could switch nationalities with how hard you're trying to be  :jesse:


:iceburn: :iceburn: :iceburn: :iceburn: :iceburn:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 10, 2015, 08:43:41 PM
kek, as if wanting to be an american is an insult
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on August 10, 2015, 11:58:19 PM
Bargain Bin Bruce Lee

Beg the US for a green card.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on August 11, 2015, 12:22:20 AM
Quote
In 2010, the Strategic Defence and Security Review was published. As part of the plans, the British Army will be reduced by 23 regular units, and by 2020 will number 112,000 soldiers, of whom 82,000 will be regulars and 30,000 will be reservists.[3]

i know numbers arent everything but...

Quote
The JGSDF numbered around 150,000 soldiers in 2008.
Quote
The [Italian] army is an all-volunteer force of active-duty personnel, numbering 105,062 personnel in 2012
Quote
The USMC has around 194,000 active duty members and just under 40,000 reserve Marines as of 2010.[3] It is the smallest of the U.S. Armed Forces within the U.S. Department of Defense.
:geithner:

Quote
In the 2010–11 financial year the Australian Army had an average strength of 47,135 personnel: 30,235 permanent (regular) and 16,900 active reservists (part-time).
as a proportion of population, Australia isn't doing that bad

its worse for the navy and air force figures (for britain)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Martin Looter King on August 17, 2015, 09:54:06 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dydfyg1yVdI

EDIT:
Quote from: strug
  superpooper [17|Aug 09:58 PM]:   dude's face went full african prior to the keying
  superpooper [17|Aug 09:58 PM]:   ;laksdf;lkasdjfalk;sdf white devil alksdjfa;lskdfja;lksdjfa;lskdfugh
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on August 18, 2015, 05:21:50 PM
All is faggot
Quote
A YouGov poll this week put the number of 18- to 24-year-old Brits who identify as entirely heterosexual at 46%, while just 6% would call themselves exclusively gay. Sexuality now falls between the lines: identity is more pliable, and fluidity more acceptable, than ever before.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/aug/18/bisexual-british-adults-define-gay-straight-heterosexual

Also Conservatives and Liberal Democrats the gayest... no surprise.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/7zv13z8mfn/YG-Archive-150813-%20Sexuality.pdf
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on August 18, 2015, 05:52:52 PM
1600 mid 20s londoners aren't sure on their sexuality? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on August 18, 2015, 10:48:27 PM
(http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003886891/not_sure_idiocracy1_answer_101_xlarge.jpeg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blakks are not very cool on September 06, 2015, 06:46:34 PM
(http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1437/51/1437516323237.png)

I love the "arsenal found!!" articles and they end up being a few rusty .22 rounds. USA is heading that way.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on September 07, 2015, 02:33:08 PM
All is faggot
Quote
A YouGov poll this week put the number of 18- to 24-year-old Brits who identify as entirely heterosexual at 46%, while just 6% would call themselves exclusively gay. Sexuality now falls between the lines: identity is more pliable, and fluidity more acceptable, than ever before.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/aug/18/bisexual-british-adults-define-gay-straight-heterosexual

Also Conservatives and Liberal Democrats the gayest... no surprise.
https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/7zv13z8mfn/YG-Archive-150813-%20Sexuality.pdf

lol that should read 54% of young british adults desperate to be special.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on September 07, 2015, 02:38:19 PM
(http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1437/51/1437516323237.png)

I love the "arsenal found!!" articles and they end up being a few rusty .22 rounds. USA is heading that way.

not surprised they found evidence of primitive spearchuckers in London
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on September 08, 2015, 07:40:40 AM
What's black and eats fish and chips?

50% of London.

This joke brought to you by the year 1996
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: MervinSn on September 13, 2015, 01:06:25 AM
And separate the small frequence act cancelled. They were interviewed in their homes and were welcome to abide a blanket welfare scrutiny in a fluid communication middle (MEC).  It is the fabric epistemology  generic 10mg deltasone otc (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section1/). These requirements variegate wide and, in general, compel a often shorter menses of breeding than is the framing for conqueror Framework teachers. Activity these unvaried stairs to determination and selecting a paid braider and you module be intimately on your selection to a high revolutionary expression and an coverall pleasing have from play to closing.  Our wellbeing is our nearly treasured artefact  buy generic zithromax 250mg (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section2/). The pursuing is a arranged of steps, both in intellection and few to be victimized finished expose the programme to ascertain achiever. 2 gazillion children below 18, and of those, 4 jillion suffered from a serious asthma in 2003.  Or, much important, are saunas venturous to your wellness  purchase nolvadex 10mg on line (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section3/). A near and price efficient assets in a management promulgation for Zen Ebb should admit an adjustable depression with its umteen good features. To succeed coherent overconfident results for a somebody time, it is advisable to mingle the utilization of dieting pills with goodly low-fat matter and systematic exercises.  You both mightiness be happy of it  buy cheap viagra professional 100mg line erectile dysfunction with age (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section4/).
Your torso haw poverty much of these nutrients and thirst brown as a reply. * How to utilization the superpower of associations and nuisance & delight to curbing your appetence and cease succor uptake.  3 Asthma Litigate land  tadalafil 60 discount erectile dysfunction klonopin (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section5/). Irrigate is no. constrained done a percolate to transfer largest impurities, specified as congest or moxie. Attractive lengthy walks in the countryside, activity golf; restful outings at the lake and perception delicious cooking sort the integral feel a memorable digit.  Mindful MBSR implementation Mindful Based Stress Reduction  buy sildenafil 150 mg cheap erectile dysfunction operation (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section6/). What does contemplation do? Feeling into diets that treat how you stool appease tidy and what types of nutrients it module append.  Percentage guard  purchase advair diskus 0.10 mg with mastercard allergy symptoms for alcohol (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section7/). I was observation a pretence titled Dr. Deed your dentition professionally clean every sixer to 12 months is requisite in removing the brass that develops in malice of elaborate brush and flossing.  Ingest not to do this  generic 400 mg albenza with visa (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section8/).
Apply too helps to asseverate a whole torso and handle which has an awful force on your welfare and unsusceptible group. It's aforementioned to likewise gain tightness and memory, slaying circulation, regulation personify temperature and gives us much life.  The HEPA operates by physically caparison particles that consume the filtrate  buy 250mg disulfiram with amex (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section9/). Philpott MD of Oklahoma has shown that personalty of magnets are at their near strong at night, and here's ground. 4.  ' Avoiding deep-fried foods and constrictive inlet of carbohydrates  250mg chloromycetin otc mental therapy career (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section10/).
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: MervinSn on September 13, 2015, 01:07:03 AM
Lower evident would be few of the accessory results which frequently company reinforced somatic suitability. 9.  Acupressure helps supple muscles and gives muscles aliment by developed circulation  discount deltasone 20 mg otc (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section1/). But do yourself and everyone about you a favour. Bruit has it that this nutrient was so favorite in England and the colonies that during the indweller Battle for Independence, bush was stillness served in umteen of the 13 colonies nether a ingathering of aliases.  Of teaching for some, medicine and operation are wise  discount zithromax 250 mg on line (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section2/). If you don't screw welfare shelter so it is tied much heavy to possess checkup sum on your motorcar contract. Umpteen wellness experts let prefabricated a plain kudos of 8 12 oz. eyeglasses of piss every epoch.  Be charitable to your feet  nolvadex 10mg without a prescription (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section3/). I am fascinated in doing many abstraction to the gild so I score elect this route to ameliorate the grouping who mortal forfeit every the promise in object the aid for their disease. m.  Likewise, aqua-lung diving, skydiving and rope propulsion are not sports I would advise to person with asthma  buy discount viagra professional 100mg erectile dysfunction lab tests (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section4/).
By doing something quiet earlier you injure the hay, care reading, expiration for a gyp travel or action a bath, you relinquishing unsought enmity and focus that dismiss alteration a outstanding enactment in how healthy you rest apiece period. that makes shakes providing you with loads of vitamins, proteins, and carbohydrates to arrest goodish time you retrograde weightiness.  Make us see how this typewrite of cancer occurs in the punctuation or rectum  generic tadalafil 20mg online erectile dysfunction quick fix (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section5/). D. Who necessarily to be examined?  Atkinson W, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L, et al  cheap sildenafil 150mg otc yellow 5 impotence (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section6/). Couple a salad entr?ùe bag formerly per week, fulfill your spaghetti sauce with vegetables, and get order a hebdomadal dish with an artefact bringing of thriving vegetables. A.  Gleason PP, Meehan TP, Fine JM, et al  0.5 mg advair diskus mastercard allergy medicine yellow (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section7/). DEET is fundamentally a nephrotoxic liquid that workings in an unmatched percentage. Both are mainstays of practitioners of easterly punishment.  They leave not surely append to your wretchedness  buy discount albenza 400mg on line (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section8/).
Be braced to live the facts of what vapour stool do to your eudaimonia. But the implicit molecular mechanisms of these versatile disease keep human a standardized beginning effort likewise more oxidative difficulty.  Pickings Detoxify Teas  buy disulfiram 250mg (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section9/). Chase a some oversimplified stairs give produce a beautify transformation. Thither could be the motivation for switch of the invest.  A ' Well, not in today's class  order 250mg chloromycetin with mastercard developmental origins of brain disorders roles for dopamine (http://www.santjordi-asociados.com/activity/catalog3/section10/).
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on September 13, 2015, 07:59:59 AM
Quote
12 oz. eyeglasses of piss every epoch
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on September 13, 2015, 04:33:42 PM
After Labour took a beating in this year's elections, they responded by replacing Ed Miliband with this guy:

(http://blewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/image-4.jpg)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Corbyn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Corbyn_Labour_Party_leadership_campaign,_2015

Quote
As a self-described democratic socialist, Corbyn has advocated the re-nationalisation of public utilities and railways, combating corporate tax evasion and avoidance as an alternative to austerity, abolishing university tuition fees and restoring student grants, a unilateral policy of nuclear disarmament, quantitative easing to fund infrastructure and renewable energy projects, and reversing cuts to the public sector and welfare made since 2010 by the government of David Cameron. He is also a member of the Socialist Campaign Group, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Amnesty International, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the National Chair of the Stop the War Coalition.

Quote
While still at school Corbyn became active in the Wrekin Constituency Young Socialists and his local Labour Party, as well as the League Against Cruel Sports

Quote
In August 2015, Corbyn raised the possibility of introducing women-only carriages on public transport, as well as a 24-hour hotline for women to report cases of harassment.[65] He said that although his aim was to "make public transport safer for everyone from the train platform, to the bus stop to the mode of transport itself", he would consult women on whether such carriages would be welcome, after the idea was suggested to him.[65] His statement was condemned by Yvette Cooper, Andy Burnham and Liz Kendall, with Cooper stating that Corbyn's plan was "turning the clock back instead of tackling the problem",[66] while Conservative Women's Minister Nicky Morgan said she was "uncomfortable with the idea", which sounded like "segregation"

Quote
He has been strongly criticised by Labour and Conservative MPs for holding meetings with former members of the IRA in the Houses of Parliament to discuss topics such as conditions in Northern Irish prisons and the IRA ceasefire.

Quote
Corbyn has spoken of the socio-economic and cultural benefits of immigration to the United Kingdom, particularly of multiculturalism and the high number of immigrant workers employed by the National Health Service. He also condemned the Labour Party's 2015 election manifesto pledge to reduce levels of immigration as "appalling".[59] Corbyn has accused David Cameron of using "incendiary language" when he accused a "swarm" of people as the cause of the Calais migrant crisis[60] and also described the Home Office's response to the Syrian refugee crisis as "heartless and powerless", during the Sky News debate in September 2015

He also considers himself a friend of Hezbollah.  Sounds like a great leader!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on September 13, 2015, 04:54:08 PM
I'd say at least he isn't Blair but then he wants to bend other the national for a good pounding by Russia and the Argies to.

A plus point is a Eurosceptic at the helm of one of the biggest parties before the EU referendum next year. :farage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Robot on September 13, 2015, 07:14:27 PM
I'd say at least he isn't Blair but then he wants to bend other the national for a good pounding by Russia and the Argies to.

A plus point is a Eurosceptic at the helm of one of the biggest parties before the EU referendum next year. :farage:

I don't think Labour stands a snowballs chance in hell any more either way. Unless we get invaded by immigrants who then get citizenship and vote to let more in... oh fuck.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitters on September 13, 2015, 08:26:33 PM
Quote
League Against Cruel Sports

 :facepalm:

If you don't channel the basic human desire for violence into sports, it's going to spill out in all sorts of unintended consequences.
 
Quote
In August 2015, Corbyn raised the possibility of introducing women-only carriages on public transport

The good news is that all those migrants flooding in are going to be totally down with this idea.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitters on September 13, 2015, 08:29:05 PM
quote =/= edit lol
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on September 13, 2015, 09:08:47 PM
I'd say at least he isn't Blair but then he wants to bend other the national for a good pounding by Russia and the Argies to.

A plus point is a Eurosceptic at the helm of one of the biggest parties before the EU referendum next year. :farage:

I don't think Labour stands a snowballs chance in hell any more either way. Unless we get invaded by immigrants who then get citizenship and vote to let more in... oh fuck.

Conservatives in Britain need to switch tactics, they need to reframe stopping immigration not as keeping out darkie and haji, but as keeping those OTHER darkies/haji out. And that if we bring in more darkies, there will be less gibs to go around.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on September 14, 2015, 12:31:54 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09vqhZV6jt8

ARISE BRITAIN
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on September 14, 2015, 03:57:39 AM
Quote
League Against Cruel Sports

 :facepalm:

If you don't channel the basic human desire for violence into sports, it's going to spill out in all sorts of unintended consequences.

Yeah but you can watch people bray the fuck out of eachother instead of bullfighting, fox hunting (with dogs) and so on.

edit: well just read the fucker is going to campaign to stay in the EU. Hope the old commie bastard falls off his bike.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on September 14, 2015, 08:37:20 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09vqhZV6jt8

ARISE BRITAIN


Its finally beginning to happen.  :reagan:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on September 14, 2015, 09:26:05 AM
"Nigel who says these men are all murderers rapists and pedophiles?"

Proper response would be: All of human history.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on September 14, 2015, 03:48:54 PM
"Nigel who says these men are all murderers rapists and pedophiles?"

Proper response would be: All of human history.

Even better response would be ask what percentage of rapists, murderers, and other violent criminals are migrants in Sweden, the UK, etc and then asking what percentage of the population are migrants.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Colonial Sanders on September 14, 2015, 08:32:18 PM
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/13/nicola-sturgeon-snp-scotland-considering-second-independence-vote (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/13/nicola-sturgeon-snp-scotland-considering-second-independence-vote)

Step one: Scotland secedes from the UK.

Quote
FOR FREEDOM!
:say:
 :mel:

Step two: Scotland joins the EU as a full member, becoming part of the Schengen area.

 :vince:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on September 15, 2015, 01:42:04 PM
There's so much infighting about that new labour guy that i'll honestly be surprised if he gets in. I picked up a newspaper on the way to work today, people are pissy because although he kept his promise of 50% women in his office (its actually higher, he has 16 women and 15 men) people are annoyed because the women "aren't important enough". He's had to talk about diversity already.

At least other parties can just go "lol fuck diversity" and be honest about it. Diversity is practically death by a thousand cuts anyway, with each little Muhammed being a cut.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on September 15, 2015, 03:27:17 PM
It is glorious. I get to watch Blairite cunts catfight with Commie cunts. And lol at the right wing press scare tactics.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Hogbox on September 15, 2015, 07:04:51 PM
Just the fact that even the fucking Guardian has been publishing an endless series of concern-troll articles about the dangers of Corbyn makes me think that he'll be an interesting Labour leader.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on September 16, 2015, 05:53:28 AM
Daily Mail has scraped a twitter for content
Quote
And now, thanks to the popular Twitter account Highgate Mums — named after one of the area’s most expensive suburbs — snippets of overheard conversations and parents’ confessions reveal its day-to-day realities like never before.

Some of my favs

Quote
Say ‘no’ to a teenager and the next thing you know she’ll have absolutely no self-esteem.
Quote
I’m hauled in regularly about her behaviour as if I’m somehow responsible!
Quote
Oh God. When told supper was sausages and lentils my 12-year-old cried: ‘Yay! Ordinary people’s food!’
Quote
Me: ‘But couldn’t your husband take the kids camping instead?’ Friend: ‘No, Giles is attending a Real Bread conference at SOAS [the School of Oriental and African Studies].’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3236233/Daddy-sweetie-tastes-papaya-Just-one-toe-curling-remarks-overheard-wealthy-London-area-s-home-chattering-classes-plenty-just-smug.html

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: mustard gas effect on September 16, 2015, 02:03:42 PM
Here Corbyn talks about how everyone is wrong, and Socialism does work.

Socialism DOES Work | Jeremy Corbyn | Oxford Union
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZvAvNJL-gE

FREE MARKET EVIL, FREE MARKET EVIL. THATCHER IS THE DEVIL

Muh Feels over reals
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Colonial Sanders on September 17, 2015, 03:13:24 AM
Here Corbyn talks about how everyone is wrong, and Socialism does work.

Socialism DOES Work | Jeremy Corbyn | Oxford Union
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZvAvNJL-gE

FREE MARKET EVIL, FREE MARKET EVIL. THATCHER IS THE DEVIL

Muh Feels over reals

This guy has zero chance.  The butthurt wing of the Labour party decided to stage a revolt and go from not-very-electable to fucking dead in the water.  Good work.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: URANIUM CURES HIPPIES on September 18, 2015, 10:44:30 AM
Here Corbyn talks about how everyone is wrong, and Socialism does work.

Socialism DOES Work | Jeremy Corbyn | Oxford Union
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZvAvNJL-gE

FREE MARKET EVIL, FREE MARKET EVIL. THATCHER IS THE DEVIL

Muh Feels over reals

This guy has zero chance.  The butthurt wing of the Labour party decided to stage a revolt and go from not-very-electable to fucking dead in the water.  Good work.

I think he just might be able to take number 10 away from Cameron, if only by not being a Tory-lite.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: mustard gas effect on September 18, 2015, 11:47:31 AM
Corbyn rightly hates Israel for all its crimes. Except that means he is labeled a antisemitic  commie. Since the Jews control all the media, every paper has run a article on how he hates the jews and is a commie.

Why Jeremy Corbyn Scares British Jews So Much
http://forward.com/news/320934/why-jeremy-corbyn-scares-so-many-british-jews/ (http://forward.com/news/320934/why-jeremy-corbyn-scares-so-many-british-jews/)

Enemies of Britain... but friends of Corbyn: How new Labour leader appears to hate this country,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3232217/Enemies-Britain-friends-Corbyn-Analysis-Jewish-Chronicle-editor-STEPHEN-POLLARD.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3232217/Enemies-Britain-friends-Corbyn-Analysis-Jewish-Chronicle-editor-STEPHEN-POLLARD.html)

Anti-Israel Jeremy Corbyn is new UK Labour leader
http://www.timesofisrael.com/jeremy-corbyn-claims-victory-in-labour-leadership-race/ (http://www.timesofisrael.com/jeremy-corbyn-claims-victory-in-labour-leadership-race/)

Jewish Chronicle accuses Corbyn of associating with Holocaust deniers
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/13/jewish-chronicle-accuses-jeremy-corbyn-associating-holocaust-deniers (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/13/jewish-chronicle-accuses-jeremy-corbyn-associating-holocaust-deniers)

UK Jewish leaders seek clarification on Jeremy Corbyn's policies
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/17/britain-jewish-leaders-seek-clarification-jeremy-corbyn-policies (http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/17/britain-jewish-leaders-seek-clarification-jeremy-corbyn-policies)

Jeremy Corbyn must publicly reject Hamas and Hezbollah, leading Jewish group demands
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11829462/Jeremy-Corbyn-must-publicly-reject-Hamas-and-Hezbollah-leading-Jewish-group-demands.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11829462/Jeremy-Corbyn-must-publicly-reject-Hamas-and-Hezbollah-leading-Jewish-group-demands.html)

Jewish Labour MP Slams Jeremy Corbyn for anti-Semitic’ Ties
 http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.671328 (http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.671328)

Corbyn supporters post vile racism and he says nothing
http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/comment/143148/corbyn-supporters-post-vile-racism-and-he-says-nothing (http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/comment/143148/corbyn-supporters-post-vile-racism-and-he-says-nothing)

This is just a few from the first page of a google search, it goes on and I'm sure it will grow towards a general election.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: FunwithEugenics on September 18, 2015, 11:52:06 AM
I have to say, choosing who to root for between jews and commies is like choosing which type of cancer you'd prefer
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on September 18, 2015, 03:41:03 PM
yea i side with the jews in jews vs sand people but im not required to feel amazing about it
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on September 18, 2015, 07:14:04 PM
Corbyn rightly hates Israel for all its crimes. Except that means he is labeled a antisemitic  commie.

I don't mind him being anti-Israel as much I'm apalled at how pro-terrorist he is.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Easy Bake Anne Frank on September 18, 2015, 10:42:56 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3238409/Judge-backs-harsher-sentence-given-paedophile-abused-Asian-girls-shame-suffer.html

Welp, it's official. Raping a white girl in the UK is not as bad as raping a minority girl.

:fuckthisgayearth:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on September 19, 2015, 02:14:12 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3238409/Judge-backs-harsher-sentence-given-paedophile-abused-Asian-girls-shame-suffer.html

Welp, it's official. Raping a white girl in the UK is not as bad as raping a minority girl.

:fuckthisgayearth:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on September 19, 2015, 03:41:32 AM
So many faggot cuck judges in this country how does this even happen?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blakks are not very cool on September 24, 2015, 01:40:56 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11881454/Merseyside-police-officers-allegedly-refuse-to-help-Tesco-worker-struggling-with-thief.html

Quote
Four police officers who were flagged down by a store manager as his colleague detained a thief just feet away allegedly said they were "not kitted up" to help and drove away.

They are subject to some kind of misconduct hearing though.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on September 24, 2015, 04:39:23 PM
They'll get told "don't do that again lads" and then they'll walk out laughing like usual.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blakks are not very cool on October 06, 2015, 12:41:22 PM
Another one of these stories: http://www.lincolnshireecho.co.uk/Bomb-disposal-team-close-Lincolnshire-household/story-27914837-detail/story.html

Quote
“A bomb disposal team was called out to a Lincolnshire household recycling centre on Friday [after] an ammunition shell was found at the site, The Explosive Ordinance Disposal from RAF Cranwell was dispatched to the scene at the recycling centre in Skegness after the discovery at around midday. A spokesman for Lincolnshire Police said that the ammunition shell was found to not be live – even though it appeared to be at first. The centre was closed for several hours while the investigation was carried out.”

 :facepalm:

A single shell casing...
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on October 06, 2015, 03:45:59 PM

I bet the "household recycling centre" workers (likely some flavor of shitskin) knew perfectly well it was a harmless shell but figured they could easily get the day off by playing dumb. Can't write up a worker for being too careful. And they were right.

Same attitude as the workers in old Communist countries, except those had to actually sabotage the machinery in order to dodge work because claiming "safety corcerns" would have only earned them a hearty laugh from the supervisor.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on October 13, 2015, 12:46:53 PM
the grauniad always delivers when you check comment is free

(http://i.imgur.com/6MrDC6W.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on October 13, 2015, 01:12:37 PM
the grauniad always delivers when you check comment is free

(http://i.imgur.com/6MrDC6W.png)
What?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on October 13, 2015, 01:30:52 PM
the grauniad always delivers when you check comment is free

(http://i.imgur.com/6MrDC6W.png)
What?

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on October 17, 2015, 10:21:38 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaLbfwisA_M

Britons protest to show much they love immigration by making people with jobs inconvenienced.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on October 17, 2015, 10:28:03 AM
lollin at the broad with the fake blood.

How can I make this all about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

TAKE PICTURES OF MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

LOOK AT

MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on October 19, 2015, 09:56:32 AM
So (and serious question here) why isn't everyone in the UK voting for UKIP yet?

I'm not saying they're squeaky clean, but they seriously look like the only really good alternative to getting back on track (and out of the EU).

Also lol at the people that say getting out of the EU will be economically catastrophical for the UK, what fucking planet are you living on?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: amulet of faggotry +2 on October 19, 2015, 12:24:31 PM
So (and serious question here) why isn't everyone in the UK voting for UKIP yet?

Because it's a racist and fascist party
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on October 19, 2015, 12:47:05 PM
So (and serious question here) why isn't everyone in the UK voting for UKIP yet?

Because it's a racist and fascist party

You say that like it's a bad thing.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on October 19, 2015, 01:06:52 PM
So (and serious question here) why isn't everyone in the UK voting for UKIP yet?

Because it's a racist and fascist party

You make it sound like they're proposing the lynching of all niggers, and from what i've seen that isn't even remotely the case.

Besides the fact that modern day europe has very interesting definitions of what constitutes racism and what doesn't.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Whig Historian on October 19, 2015, 01:16:28 PM
So (and serious question here) why isn't everyone in the UK voting for UKIP yet?

I'm not saying they're squeaky clean, but they seriously look like the only really good alternative to getting back on track (and out of the EU).

Also lol at the people that say getting out of the EU will be economically catastrophical for the UK, what fucking planet are you living on?
To be generous to the non-UKIP supporters, running a government isn't just a matter of removing kebab shop and small single-issue parties often don't know much about actually governing.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on October 19, 2015, 01:24:56 PM
So (and serious question here) why isn't everyone in the UK voting for UKIP yet?

I'm not saying they're squeaky clean, but they seriously look like the only really good alternative to getting back on track (and out of the EU).

Also lol at the people that say getting out of the EU will be economically catastrophical for the UK, what fucking planet are you living on?
To be generous to the non-UKIP supporters, running a government isn't just a matter of removing kebab shop and small single-issue parties often don't know much about actually governing.

I don't think most people in europe know exactly what they're doing either, this whole migrant crisis proves that.

What i was trying to say was that people should back UKIP in the sense of getting out of the EU, and then they can decide who is fit to govern and who isn't.

I'm not disagreeing with you, i'm just saying.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on October 19, 2015, 01:33:58 PM
So (and serious question here) why isn't everyone in the UK voting for UKIP yet?

Because it's a racist and fascist party
its really not though unless you want to take all meaning away from those terms. Its smeared that way much like the way socialist is used
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on October 19, 2015, 01:53:29 PM
I don't vote UKIP because while I agree with a lot of what they say, I don't actually think they can manage anything other than migrants.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Wehrmacht Bitches At on October 19, 2015, 05:23:41 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11939909/sexist-words-school-playground-report.html
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on October 25, 2015, 07:29:35 PM
Quote
Speaking as a white man, don’t we have ghastly complexions? Par-baked like those bread rolls you can buy in supermarkets, we look like not quite the finished product. Glancing at the person opposite on the Tube the other day, I thought “if only I could be that colour”. He was in his late thirties, maybe, south Asian, maybe Sri-Lankan; and his skin was that beautiful golden brown that whispers that this is how humans were supposed to look. White is just wrong for skin — a kind of mutation, as though some key pigment was missing from birth. It looks inbred. I met a girl when I was younger called Weetabix (she said her rural Nigerian parents had wanted her to have an English name, and chose one at the general store) who described sleeping with a white man as being like “sleeping with a skinned animal”: semi-transparent with the blood vessels visible. The awful mental image has never left me. And as you get older (if you’re white) you realise that a white skin is like a white carpet: it shows all the stains and blemishes. White youths enjoy a sort of mayfly summer, looking an enviable milky alabaster for about half an hour — before they blotch and smudge and scuff and smear and pimple and flush and rash and scratch and mottle themselves into shop-soiled old age. My number one colour would be caramel, closely followed by the almost inky black of the Turkana tribe I once travelled among in northern Kenya. Come on, admit it, whiteys: if you were God designing the human animal, your brush poised above the divine palette, would you really go for just-crawled-out-from-under-a-stone off-white? Sallow sucks. [If I had a choice, I wouldn’t be a whitey by Matthew Parris; Times (U.K.), October 21st 2015.] Weetabix, I should explain, is a breakfast cereal popular in Airstrip One for many decades. It was my favorite as a child over there, mainly because the box featured a panel with shapes you could cut out, fold, and slot together to make a car or a truck. (We didn’t have iPads in 1953, you understand.)
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article4591550.ece

Matthew Parris, former Conservative MP.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 26, 2015, 05:45:11 PM
If the UK was the 51'st American state, guess where it would rank in terms of income?

https://mises.org/blog/if-sweden-and-germany-became-us-states-they-would-be-among-poorest-states

51 out of 51  :stewart:

Guess where the glorious socialist utiopia of Sweden ranks?   

39 out of 51


GG Europe!  :tuss:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: FunwithEugenics on October 26, 2015, 05:55:48 PM
If the UK was the 51'st American state, guess where it would rank in terms of income?

https://mises.org/blog/if-sweden-and-germany-became-us-states-they-would-be-among-poorest-states

51 out of 51  :stewart:

Guess where the glorious socialist utiopia of Sweden ranks?   

39 out of 51


GG Europe!  :tuss:
Holy shit, there's never been a more convincing takedown of social-democracy style socialism. When you fare worse than Mississippi,you know you suck.
However, I can already hear the leftist defense: "Sure they're less rich but they have better programs to help them! If they were taken into account, they would be richer!"
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 26, 2015, 06:11:19 PM
If the UK was the 51'st American state, guess where it would rank in terms of income?

https://mises.org/blog/if-sweden-and-germany-became-us-states-they-would-be-among-poorest-states

51 out of 51  :stewart:

Guess where the glorious socialist utiopia of Sweden ranks?   

39 out of 51


GG Europe!  :tuss:
Holy shit, there's never been a more convincing takedown of social-democracy style socialism. When you fare worse than Mississippi,you know you suck.
However, I can already hear the leftist defense: "Sure they're less rich but they have better programs to help them! If they were taken into account, they would be richer!"

From the study:

Quote
These national-level comparisons take into account taxes, and include social benefits (e.g., "welfare" and state-subsidized health care) as income. Purchasing power is adjusted to take differences in the cost of living in different countries into account.
:stewart:


There are only 3 countries in all of Europe that would be counted among the "wealthy US states", meaning in the top 50% in terms of income.  Those countries are: Switzerland, Norway and Luxembourg.  The rest would be considered "Poor US states".

Mississippi (the worst state there is)  has a higher median income ($23,017) than 18 countries measured here including: The Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, and the United Kingdom, all of which have median income levels below $23,000 and are thus below every single US state there is.

Germany (the economic powerhouse of Europe  :smug: ) would rank 42 out of 51 if it was a US State.


The Europeon model is clearly the way of the future.  FEEL THE BERN 2016!    :unparsons:


You guys want to know the best part?  Keep reading until the end of the study when he starts factoring in cost of living and purchasing power for each individual state.  Since it's cheap as fuck to live there, Mississippi really aint that bad.   With cost of living and purchasing power factored in Mississippi actually beats Germany


MISSISSIPPI IS MORE WEALTHY THAN GERMANY


:tom:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on October 26, 2015, 06:40:56 PM
The uk has a population of 64.1 million (2013).

Mississippi has a population of 2.994 million (2014).

The uk's average income is £21,000

Mississippi's average income is $36,919

Shameful. Absolutely shameful.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on October 26, 2015, 06:49:09 PM
As a European living in a European socialist utopia, the kind your liberals always pine for, and being preached about how great our socialist utopia yet wondering at the same time how come it seems the average 30-something American dude can afford to roll in a Corvette or whatever without dying of debt, while here everyone and their mother drives a Japanese shitbox from the 90's, lives in a cramped apartment and still has debt up the ass despite apparently living in the best system in the world (at least as long as you don't look at the suicide numbers... or the purchase power... or...), I have to say:

I'm not least bit fucking surprised.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on October 26, 2015, 07:17:10 PM
You guys want to know the best part?  Keep reading until the end of the study when he starts factoring in cost of living and purchasing power for each individual state.  Since it's cheap as fuck to live there, Mississippi really aint that bad.   With cost of living and purchasing power factored in Mississippi actually beats Germany


MISSISSIPPI IS MORE WEALTHY THAN GERMANY


:tom:

Yeah I was wondering if they'd get to purchasing power, and when they did I cracked the fuck up. I've seen time and time again on sites like Reddit with large numbers of Euro users that they're sometimes flabbergasted at how cheap some stuff is in the US. It rules.

Listening to lectures about how great socialism is from some Swedish Redditor faggot is like yankees and hipsters from the Pacific Northwest squalling about raising the minimum wage - we don't fucking need that shit in huge areas of the USA because the cost of living is so low here.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on October 26, 2015, 07:18:46 PM
its something euros all kinda know if you pay attention but if euros felt it in their bones theyd be rioting in the streets. You arent getting a return on your taxes near enough to make up for that abysmally high rates, to say nothing of what it does to businesses.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on October 26, 2015, 09:46:27 PM
So basically,
(https://media.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjDIRRfh7M3HIKk/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 26, 2015, 10:04:44 PM
You guys want to know the best part?  Keep reading until the end of the study when he starts factoring in cost of living and purchasing power for each individual state.  Since it's cheap as fuck to live there, Mississippi really aint that bad.   With cost of living and purchasing power factored in Mississippi actually beats Germany


MISSISSIPPI IS MORE WEALTHY THAN GERMANY


:tom:

Yeah I was wondering if they'd get to purchasing power, and when they did I cracked the fuck up. I've seen time and time again on sites like Reddit with large numbers of Euro users that they're sometimes flabbergasted at how cheap some stuff is in the US. It rules.

Listening to lectures about how great socialism is from some Swedish Redditor faggot is like yankees and hipsters from the Pacific Northwest squalling about raising the minimum wage - we don't fucking need that shit in huge areas of the USA because the cost of living is so low here.

Yeah like show some Eurofaggot how they can easily open up the Sunday paper and find a used car for $500.  Not to mention the fact that gas costs 1/10th as much over here as it does there.

Doesn't fucking Denmark have a 150% tax on the sale of cars or something insane like that?   A beat up used Honda Civic for $50,000  :tuss: :tuss: :tuss: WHAT A BARGAIN!

Is it even possible for a Euro-pee-on to make $25,000 a year and own two cars?  Because its fucking EASY AS SHIT to do that in the USA.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on October 26, 2015, 10:12:34 PM
So basically,
(https://media.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjDIRRfh7M3HIKk/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on October 26, 2015, 10:13:43 PM
The European system has created a permanent underclass that gets taxed to fuck if you want to earn anything more than middle class wages.  It seems like it is a system that benefits only those with inherited wealth (as in old world wealth) and the poor.  Everyone else is shit out of luck.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on October 27, 2015, 03:26:50 AM
The European system has created a permanent underclass that gets taxed to fuck if you want to earn anything more than middle class wages.  It seems like it is a system that benefits only those with inherited wealth (as in old world wealth) and the poor.  Everyone else is shit out of luck.

You forget the government, who create a population completely dependent on the government & its services, and has no resources to be able to exist very long without them.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on October 27, 2015, 06:37:55 AM
Yeah like show some Eurofaggot how they can easily open up the Sunday paper and find a used car for $500.  Not to mention the fact that gas costs 1/10th as much over here as it does there.

Doesn't fucking Denmark have a 150% tax on the sale of cars or something insane like that?   A beat up used Honda Civic for $50,000  :tuss: :tuss: :tuss: WHAT A BARGAIN!

Is it even possible for a Euro-pee-on to make $25,000 a year and own two cars?  Because its fucking EASY AS SHIT to do that in the USA.

It's not. You can buy one I guess, but good luck trying to drive it. Taxes, mandatory insurances, mandatory yearly inspection means you'll be spending a minimum of 1500€ just to be allowed to drive the car, every year. And that's for a jap shitbox, all that shit scales, so for an Audi or god forbid an SUV that number is closer to 3000. That plus gas and of course any maintenance work. Gas costs 1,5€ per litre at the moment. Fill up your ricebox Toyota? That's 60-80€ (66-88 bucks), thank you very much.

And as for the cost of buying the car itself? How about 9000 euros (10K bux) for a 13-year old Camry?
http://www.nettiauto.com/toyota/camry/7540920

Or maybe you want to get that American experience and get your hands on a sweet ass Camaro. Boy, do we have a bargain for you!
Just 16000€ for a 15-year old one! http://www.nettiauto.com/chevrolet/camaro/7430593

A used, 3-5 year old one is 60 000€. New ones start at 72000€.
A new Toyota Avensis starts at 30 000something €, with the high-end model (which would be the standard one in US) being around 50 000€


Or let's give an example on my favourite thing, Cameras. Sony RX-10 MK2. 1300 dollars new from B&H. In Finland? 1700€. That's 1800 bucks.

The average monthly income here is 3284€. That's with all the benefits, but before taxes and other mandatory payments. Just the income tax at that tax bracket is 30,5%. Add to that mandatory municipality taxes, mandatory pension payments etc and you're lucky to see 2000€ per month. So a consumer bridge camera costs your whole months worth of income, and that's at a good job, one that requires 3-7 years of education. Wanna buy a Camaro? Start saving up, and you might be able to afford one after like 5 years.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: marlon perkins on October 27, 2015, 10:16:18 AM
The answer is simple: we're citizens here, Europeans are subjects.  Always have been, always will be.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on October 27, 2015, 11:07:37 AM
Or how about my country, where the average salary is 500 euros (barring the assload of taxes that reduce it) and you'll see things like the cheapest washing machine in the store being 220 euros, close to fucking half your salary gone in an instant, the cheapest fucking laptops at 315 euros, it's ridiculous.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Massive Bro Douche on October 27, 2015, 03:23:28 PM
Or maybe you want to get that American experience and get your hands on a sweet ass Camaro. Boy, do we have a bargain for you!
Just 16000€ for a 15-year old one! http://www.nettiauto.com/chevrolet/camaro/7430593

A used, 3-5 year old one is 60 000€. New ones start at 72000€.

Lel I bought a new ZL1 for much less than that and I am not wealthy at all. Cool euros need to jump ship and come to the US, we are in desperate need of white people.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 27, 2015, 05:41:25 PM

Here is a list of cars for sale that are all under $1,000.  Yep, UNDER $1,000. 

http://www.carfax.com/vehicles/Used/price-under-1000


An Illegal Mexican standing out front of Home Depot looking for work usually makes, at most, $150 a day (cash, tax free).  It's not hard at all for him to buy a car.  In fact, his family probably owns two or three (depending on how many dozens of relatives they have living with them).

I bought my first car when I was 16 working a $5/hour minimum wage job at Subway Sandwiches. 


Fucking LOL that a 30 year old middle class European has difficulty affording a car.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on October 27, 2015, 06:13:25 PM
I looked through that sales list and constantly expected to have huge red flags on every car that it's crashed to shit at some point or impossible to get past an inspection or something, because that's what sub-1000€ cars tend to be here; the kind of shitboxes you buy for either parts or revving around on private property, because they're so rusted to shit/generally beat that they'll never be road legal.

Seeing cheap SUV:s also is kinda shocking, because you can't get a decent 4x4 here for under 10000€. I've been looking into switching my Toyota to a Land Cruiser for years now but everything under a 10K is beat to shit with a minimum of 300 000km on clock, usually closer to 500 000.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on October 27, 2015, 07:41:12 PM
Small point, I just had a look at my local autotrader and I found more than enough cars for under £400 that didn't have huge red flags.

Now, insurance on the other hand...
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Hollywood Shabat Goy Yaro on October 27, 2015, 11:39:40 PM
Exactly how good are these well vaunted European social programs anyway, and what sort of comparable lifestyle would one be able to live in the US?

I had non shit parents with white collar jobs so I've never experienced poverty thank God.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on October 27, 2015, 11:55:47 PM
Exactly how good are these well vaunted European social programs anyway, and what sort of comparable lifestyle would one be able to live in the US?

I had non shit parents with white collar jobs so I've never experienced poverty thank God.

Imagine all the joys of going to the DMV except the wait takes 6 months instead of 2 hours.

:d&d: BUT HEY ITS FREE AM I RIGHT??? *pays 50% more in taxes than in a country where it's not free *


I swear to fucking god, you steal $10 out of a mans pocket but then immediately offer him $5 in "TOTALLY FREE SHIT!!!" and he actually thinks hes getting a great deal.  This is how stupid people are.  No for real, they have done plenty of marketing studies on this.  Put 2 identical items on the shelf.  1 says "Price: 30 cents each", the other says "Price: 3 for $1", people will pick 3 for $1 every single time.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on October 28, 2015, 06:32:06 AM
Exactly how good are these well vaunted European social programs anyway, and what sort of comparable lifestyle would one be able to live in the US?

I had non shit parents with white collar jobs so I've never experienced poverty thank God.

If you have a job, even a shit job honestly,  you are demonstrably better off in the us. The social services dont remotely make up and the increased cost of living means you live worse than most of our culturally enriching brethren here.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: marlon perkins on October 28, 2015, 12:10:59 PM
Fucking LOL that a 30 year old middle class European has difficulty affording a car.  :facepalm:

"Don't you understand?  American car and suburb culture are horribly inefficient and must be destroyed!  Move to the inner cities where it's healthy and sustainable you shitlords!"
:say:
:goonette:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Carbpoole on October 29, 2015, 05:50:16 PM
Exactly how good are these well vaunted European social programs anyway, and what sort of comparable lifestyle would one be able to live in the US?

I had non shit parents with white collar jobs so I've never experienced poverty thank God.

It would be something like 12-18k a yearr. The base food/clothes/spending money would be something like ~6500 dollars a year I think, after rent and utilities, but they only pay a "reasonable" price for housing so people might have to relocate to a poor neighorhood. It's also important to note that people can't have any savings or own anything of value if they get on welfare, if someone owns property they'd probably be required to sell it, even if it's the home they live in, same with any other thing, inspections might even happen to check for valuable things that could be sold.

As the increasing pressure strains the welfare system I wouldn't be surprised if they start to require married couples to sell their wedding rings for scrap gold before giving them any money.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hair sniffing boner diary on October 30, 2015, 01:12:12 AM
UK Redeemed?

 ‘Hitler Was Right’ Posters Popping Up At UK University Campus (http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/29/hitler-right-posters-popping-uk-university-campus/)

(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/10/hitler1-640x481.jpg)

Quote
“We have heard from a Jewish student organisation that they’ve had students express their discomfort and alarm at seeing a poster of Hitler suggesting support for Nazism. The reaction of the police and university must be serious and tough in order to reassure Jews and non-Jews alike that this will not be tolerated. The perpetrators of his hate crime must be found and brought to justice with zero tolerance.”

Proving him right again and again
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on October 30, 2015, 05:52:09 AM
^ Oh. Looks like NA have had a day out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4_PSw3BYTk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSMVoJPKebA
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on November 01, 2015, 09:35:30 AM
Why are so many UK media "personalities" so insufferable? These fucks drip with smug and 'la-la' land arguments so much you feel like socking them in the mouth; the migrant shit has brought it out in droves too.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: nerdball on November 01, 2015, 09:51:49 AM
Why are so many UK media "personalities" so insufferable? These fucks drip with smug and 'la-la' land arguments so much you feel like socking them in the mouth; the migrant shit has brought it out in droves too.

(http://i.imgur.com/U7Kzel5.gif)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on November 01, 2015, 01:18:24 PM
Why are so many UK media "personalities" so insufferable? These fucks drip with smug and 'la-la' land arguments so much you feel like socking them in the mouth; the migrant shit has brought it out in droves too.

Jog on, ya bloody foreigner
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on November 01, 2015, 04:45:02 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298715/Children-young-FOUR-given-transgender-lessons-encourage-explore-gender-identities.html

Quote
Children as young as four are receiving lessons from transgender campaigners – including a man who revealed to primary school classes that he is a ‘trans man’ and was ‘assigned female’ at birth.

Thousands of pupils have had the controversial classes, in which they are encouraged to explore their ‘gender identities’ and are questioned on what being a transsexual means, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Up to 20 primary schools a year pay for the classes, given by campaigners’ organisation Gendered Intelligence. Parents’ groups have reacted with concern that pupils may be ‘frightened’ by the workshops, while experts warned the lessons may confuse young children.

Gendered Intelligence has confirmed it teaches pupils of all ages in primary schools, from reception class – where children are aged four and five – up to Year Six, where pupils are aged ten and 11. The workshops cost an undisclosed sum and have been available since 2008.

The Mail on Sunday has seen footage of Gendered Intelligence conducting workshops with primary classes, in a video available for teachers to hire at the cost of £20.

In one class, Year Six boys at Hotspur Primary in Newcastle are asked to describe the ‘girlish’ things they like to do, while the girls say what ‘boyish’ pursuits they enjoy.
 

 :mindblown:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on November 01, 2015, 07:01:28 PM
They're just grooming themselves for their future Muslim overlords.

It'll be like Iran where being gay is a sin worthy of death but you can find a loophole by being trans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transsexuality_in_Iran
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Aqsa Mahmood on November 01, 2015, 07:58:53 PM
Future?

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/01/muslim-inmates-extorting-infidel-tax-no-muslims-uks-toughest-jails/

Just pack it up folks.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on November 20, 2015, 08:14:14 PM
Man Corbyn is a joke, the fact that he's being considered a serious candidate should speak to the complete detachment of politics from daily life nowadays, so much so people are willing to vote for the table scraps.

Everything i hear about this guy is laughable, good luck with that UK.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on November 20, 2015, 11:54:42 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/11975069/Power-plant-breakdowns-force-National-Grid-to-issue-alert.html

The tl;dr version is that a bunch of coal plants were down and wind power only provided 1% of the energy the turbines were supposedly capable of generating:

Quote
UK wind farms have a theoretical maximum capacity of more than 13,000 megawatts, but produced less than 400 megawatts of power for much of the peak demand period – meeting less than one per cent of the UK’s electricity needs, published data suggests.

Quote
National Grid used a new emergency scheme to pay large businesses to cut their electricity usage, resulting in dozens of large office buildings powering down their air conditioning and ventilation systems between 5pm and 6pm.

The scheme, which is paid for through levies on consumer energy bills, was introduced last year but had never been called upon before.

This is the future of green power.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on November 21, 2015, 04:58:35 AM
Green power needs really, really good batteries to be viable.  We don't have them now.  Maybe one day.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on November 21, 2015, 05:05:17 AM
Man Corbyn is a joke, the fact that he's being considered a serious candidate should speak to the complete detachment of politics from daily life nowadays, so much so people are willing to vote for the table scraps.

Everything i hear about this guy is laughable, good luck with that UK.

Man he's not a serious candidate. Labour is just a big party, but they decided they'd try something radical because they were losing votes. If Corbyn was in any other party he'd be ignored or considered a nutcase.

Hell, everything he says has his own party going "what the fuck dude". He won't win anything. Stupid motherfucker condemned the killing of terrorists right after the paris attack. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Colonial Sanders on November 21, 2015, 02:53:10 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/11975069/Power-plant-breakdowns-force-National-Grid-to-issue-alert.html

The tl;dr version is that a bunch of coal plants were down and wind power only provided 1% of the energy the turbines were supposedly capable of generating:

Quote
UK wind farms have a theoretical maximum capacity of more than 13,000 megawatts, but produced less than 400 megawatts of power for much of the peak demand period – meeting less than one per cent of the UK’s electricity needs, published data suggests.

Quote
National Grid used a new emergency scheme to pay large businesses to cut their electricity usage, resulting in dozens of large office buildings powering down their air conditioning and ventilation systems between 5pm and 6pm.

The scheme, which is paid for through levies on consumer energy bills, was introduced last year but had never been called upon before.

This is the future of green power.

Wind will pretty much never make much sense as a massive source of energy.  Even with costless transmission and perfect batteries, wind is still never going to actually generate that much energy.  Solar, with the two magic technologies mentioned above, could be gigantic.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on November 21, 2015, 03:29:17 PM
Green power needs really, really good batteries to be viable.  We don't have them now.  Maybe one day.

There's no such thing as batteries that can provide energy with the demand that our modern society uses it for, metals simply can't store enough energy and don't do well when the load shifts as much as it normally does from morning to evening.

Solar panels will be a great supplementary source of power in arid areas when they get efficient enough, but it'll always be just that - supplementary.  We'd get a ton more mileage out of upgrading our power grid to be smarter and using power more efficiently than all green power currently produces. 
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on November 21, 2015, 05:57:34 PM
theres also the fact that, assuming we never find another drop of oil or become more efficient, we got between 800-1200 years of oil left at current usage/growth rates. Add another 600ish years for coal.

So who gives a fuck.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: FunwithEugenics on November 21, 2015, 08:48:17 PM
theres also the fact that, assuming we never find another drop of oil or become more efficient, we got between 800-1200 years of oil left at current usage/growth rates. Add another 600ish years for coal.

So who gives a fuck.
Bu-bu-but fossil fuels are not renewable!!  :algore:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on November 21, 2015, 09:12:14 PM
Green power needs really, really good batteries to be viable.  We don't have them now.  Maybe one day.

There's no such thing as batteries that can provide energy with the demand that our modern society uses it for, metals simply can't store enough energy and don't do well when the load shifts as much as it normally does from morning to evening.

Solar panels will be a great supplementary source of power in arid areas when they get efficient enough, but it'll always be just that - supplementary.  We'd get a ton more mileage out of upgrading our power grid to be smarter and using power more efficiently than all green power currently produces. 

Ready for some hilarious shit if you can handle the 888 and not chink out like wimpb

As other racists point out, the real issue with every renewable other than biofuel, geothermal, and hydroelectric is energy storage & distribution. There is some "poor mans battery" which involves using a solar power to run a pump to pump water to an elevated area to run or supercharge a hydroplant. They are also looking into trying to use solar to run hydrogen generating plants, but hydrogen has shit energy density.

Here is how shit gets hilarious if hate hippies: They have figured out a way to speed up the geological processes that turn organic matter into oil. We can create man-made crude on industrial (theorhetically) scales. The problem is the process is quite energy inefficient: you get get about a 1/3 of the energy you put in back in oil (not counting the biomatter) or that you still need to refine the shit.
Which means you can hook your boilers up to a desert solar plant, feed it slaughter house waste, and have it make oil. There is enough energy hitting the Sahara desert alone, even when you factor in the thermodynamic losses, to produce enough several tens of times the amount of oil the world needs to run.

The future is solar plants turning animal bones into oil.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Uncle Touchy on November 22, 2015, 02:00:54 AM
theres also the fact that, assuming we never find another drop of oil or become more efficient, we got between 800-1200 years of oil left at current usage/growth rates. Add another 600ish years for coal.

So who gives a fuck.

Like we'll make it that far before radical islam / the jews did it force WW3 style nuclear exchanges fighting over some faked scarcity. Or maybe middle-to-bad global warming predictions are actually legit and billions starve as everybody migrates to the poles.

In general, I am a supporter of wind/solar/etc... if we can build a power grid that can take advantage of shit just happening everyday in nature.. well duh. But I don't think those sources will ever be any kind of get out of jail free card from fossil fuels. Either our way of life drastically changes or there is some battery tech that comes clear out of left field... see no other way for our global economy to ever move away from crude.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Colonial Sanders on November 22, 2015, 02:26:41 AM
The future is solar plants turning animal bones into oil.

Well, if you think about passenger jets, the only tech we have that can power them right now is some form of hydrocarbon engine.  For most purposes, even if the source changes, hydrocarbons are the future for the foreseeable.

 :bloomberg:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on November 22, 2015, 03:32:05 AM
Green power needs really, really good batteries to be viable.  We don't have them now.  Maybe one day.

There's no such thing as batteries that can provide energy with the demand that our modern society uses it for, metals simply can't store enough energy and don't do well when the load shifts as much as it normally does from morning to evening.

Solar panels will be a great supplementary source of power in arid areas when they get efficient enough, but it'll always be just that - supplementary.  We'd get a ton more mileage out of upgrading our power grid to be smarter and using power more efficiently than all green power currently produces. 

Ready for some hilarious shit if you can handle the 888 and not chink out like wimpb

As other racists point out, the real issue with every renewable other than biofuel, geothermal, and hydroelectric is energy storage & distribution. There is some "poor mans battery" which involves using a solar power to run a pump to pump water to an elevated area to run or supercharge a hydroplant. They are also looking into trying to use solar to run hydrogen generating plants, but hydrogen has shit energy density.

Here is how shit gets hilarious if hate hippies: They have figured out a way to speed up the geological processes that turn organic matter into oil. We can create man-made crude on industrial (theorhetically) scales. The problem is the process is quite energy inefficient: you get get about a 1/3 of the energy you put in back in oil (not counting the biomatter) or that you still need to refine the shit.
Which means you can hook your boilers up to a desert solar plant, feed it slaughter house waste, and have it make oil. There is enough energy hitting the Sahara desert alone, even when you factor in the thermodynamic losses, to produce enough several tens of times the amount of oil the world needs to run.

The future is solar plants turning animal bones into oil.

I remember reading all about thermal depolymerization back in the 90s and how it was "THE FUTURE!!!"

P sure it hasn't moved an inch in 20 years.  Not sayin its not cool and all, but how come it hasn't really gone anywhere yet?  Regular old ground oil still too cheap and plentiful so there is no point?

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Colonial Sanders on November 22, 2015, 03:49:09 AM
I remember reading all about thermal depolymerization back in the 90s and how it was "THE FUTURE!!!"

P sure it hasn't moved an inch in 20 years.  Not sayin its not cool and all, but how come it hasn't really gone anywhere yet?  Regular old ground oil still too cheap and plentiful so there is no point?

P much.  People did some back of the envelope calculations about what the price of oil would have to be for this to be competitive.  But, like most of these analyses, the headline figures (mostly hovering between $50 and $100 a barrel, made when oil was closer to $25) ignored 1) the cointegration of oil and coal/natural gas prices and 2) the fact that most electricity is generated by coal/natural gas.

The neat thing is that cheaper solar, which is happening, might actually make some of this shit cost competitive.  Could happen.   :geithner:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on November 22, 2015, 06:16:09 AM
Green power needs really, really good batteries to be viable.  We don't have them now.  Maybe one day.

There's no such thing as batteries that can provide energy with the demand that our modern society uses it for, metals simply can't store enough energy and don't do well when the load shifts as much as it normally does from morning to evening.

Solar panels will be a great supplementary source of power in arid areas when they get efficient enough, but it'll always be just that - supplementary.  We'd get a ton more mileage out of upgrading our power grid to be smarter and using power more efficiently than all green power currently produces. 

Ready for some hilarious shit if you can handle the 888 and not chink out like wimpb

As other racists point out, the real issue with every renewable other than biofuel, geothermal, and hydroelectric is energy storage & distribution. There is some "poor mans battery" which involves using a solar power to run a pump to pump water to an elevated area to run or supercharge a hydroplant. They are also looking into trying to use solar to run hydrogen generating plants, but hydrogen has shit energy density.

Here is how shit gets hilarious if hate hippies: They have figured out a way to speed up the geological processes that turn organic matter into oil. We can create man-made crude on industrial (theorhetically) scales. The problem is the process is quite energy inefficient: you get get about a 1/3 of the energy you put in back in oil (not counting the biomatter) or that you still need to refine the shit.
Which means you can hook your boilers up to a desert solar plant, feed it slaughter house waste, and have it make oil. There is enough energy hitting the Sahara desert alone, even when you factor in the thermodynamic losses, to produce enough several tens of times the amount of oil the world needs to run.

The future is solar plants turning animal bones into oil.

Sure, that works for anything that needs dense hydrocarbons to run (powerful motors mostly) but fuel energy is always going to be very expensive relative to just burning shit to generate electricity and distribute it to homes and businesses.  Again, you can do this with solar but as a lot of energy is lost to resistance when it's being transferred, you basically get the same return with a more efficient grid than you do by upping the juice in the ones that already exist.  It also limits the utility of having a power plant that's incredibly powerful/efficient but is 3000 miles away.  In cloudier climates with inconsistent weather and higher maintenance costs for solar panels (more damage since they're always exposed to the elements), it will never be a useful source of power.  The only realistic sources of power for 70%+ of the nation will be nuclear reactors (which we never build because of NIMBY fags who think the Simpsons is reality) or digging out more coal and burning it up.

Rebuilding infrastructure from the ground up to be more efficient doesn't win political points and hippie faggots don't care because it's doesn't have a rallying cry built in, even though it would in the long run do a lot more to save their precious environment they never visit because they're checking their cell phones at Starbucks.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on November 22, 2015, 02:31:05 PM
I remember reading all about thermal depolymerization back in the 90s and how it was "THE FUTURE!!!"

P sure it hasn't moved an inch in 20 years.  Not sayin its not cool and all, but how come it hasn't really gone anywhere yet?  Regular old ground oil still too cheap and plentiful so there is no point?

What Colonial Sanders said - pumping oil is still waaaaay cheaper. You're burning 3 barrels worth of coal to make 1 barrel of oil (plus shipping in your organic waste, plus pumping out the final product, plus refining it). If your power plants run coal, and you just need oil, there are more efficient ways to turn coal into a gasoline equivalent. In fact, I believe the South Africans figured that shit out when they were being shunned by the world for not letting niggers overrun the country.

They pretty much just demonstrated that the process could be successfully scaled to industrial level production, and I don't know that any new research has really been done.

888 faggot futurist armchair wankery prediction:
I think the first country to do this will be Iceland, and this is probably 50-100 years way at the earliest, probably double that. Iceland, thanks to being a volcanically active island, is 100% net renewable energy. They have lots of energy generation options, an active fishing industry (for the organic material) and a small demand for hydrocarbons. Also they are small, with a small population and I'll cover why that's important in my response below to OC.

Only major roadbump to my prediction would be ocean floor oil, and building/running a refinery.


Sure, that works for anything that needs dense hydrocarbons to run (powerful motors mostly) but fuel energy is always going to be very expensive relative to just burning shit to generate electricity and distribute it to homes and businesses. 

The main "cost savings" will be that while incredibly inefficient, manufactured oil will let them use existing energy distribution networks. This is one of the big issues with Natural Gas taking off for anything that isn't a city bus. Natural Gas is cleaner and refills quickly (a major problem with Electric) but there is no distribution network. You can't just convert gas pumps, it has to be a presurized system. Which is more expensive for the distributer up front, and more expensive in the long run w/r/t maintenance. Plus more ways for morons at the pump to fuck it up.
This is 1/2 the problem with electric cars, which is the recharge network is generally shit, which is a problem when you combine the short ranges & long recharge times.

I can't remember the energy savings if every worker in new york city used an electric car instead of a gas powered one, but it was pretty huge. The problem is that to make this viable you'd need install a few million charging stations. The cost of installing those stations mean this is a complete non-stater, unless everyone already has an electric car (Which they won't get because of the lack of recharge stations). Plus even if you did this for NYC, you'd still need gas stations for tourists and visitors...etc, etc, etc.
 And that's just for New York City, think about what it'd take to get 100% of the non-commercial traffic in the US into electric cars:
Its more attractive to build a cultured oil plant next to a solar plant in the desert and just keep on doing what we know works.

This ties into my earlier faggot futurist prediction about Iceland like this:
Iceland has 300,000 people in it. Overhauling their energy distribution network to distribute something other than petrol is not as great of an undertaking. Fewer cars to and fewer filling stations to convert to something new.

I'm not doing the best job of explaining it, but the tl;dr is even if tonight you were to invent some miracle completely renewable clean fuel that completely replaces gasoline, but required an entirely new distribution network, it make take a dozen or more years to replace gas due to the cost of setting it up; and that's providing it would actually succeed.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on November 22, 2015, 04:03:52 PM
I think we're talking about 2 different things, blood.

Yes, there is the strong possibility we'll use solar energy to turn crude hydrocarbons to manufacture gasoline at some point in the next 50 years.  Where we're talking past each other is that gasoline is only a small portion of overall energy usage and only generally is only used in stuff like construction, transportation, mining and landscaping where you can't just plug something into the grid, it has to be mobile and powerful. 

A shitload more energy is used in industrial processes like steel manufacturing, automobile assembly, construction, etc.  In a lot of cases, the manufacturing process of a car ends up using more energy than it burns in gasoline all its life, it's just cheaper because electricity that comes from a plant is MUCH cheaper per kilowatt than coming from gasoline - ask anyone with a gas generator about that.

Upgrading our energy grid would require a lot more money than refitting stations from gas to electric, in the tens if not hundreds of billion dollars, but the payoff we would get dwarfs the piddly faggot amount of energy that "green" energy contributes right now and will ever contribute.  As it stands we're also pretty vulnerable to a big EMP although to be fair no scientists can even really give a remotely reliable indicator of what the chances the sun will ever spit one out.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on November 22, 2015, 04:15:20 PM
A shitload more energy is used in industrial processes like steel manufacturing, automobile assembly, construction, etc.  In a lot of cases, the manufacturing process of a car ends up using more energy than it burns in gasoline all its life, it's just cheaper because electricity that comes from a plant is MUCH cheaper per kilowatt than coming from gasoline - ask anyone with a gas generator about that.

I think I know where the misunderstanding might be: I'm not saying turkey-bone oil would soley be turned into gas to cars and generators. What we'd see, beyond them discovering some new power storage options, would be a rise in oil-fired power plants: Oil becomes the "battery"/transmission mechanism from the massive solar collectors to more localized power plants*.

I agreed with the rest of your post, that environmentally we'd be better served by increasing efficiency instead of trying to create new methods of power generation. But as you said, NIMBY Hippies don't think any further than their next iphone upgrade.

*Including localized plants in other countries.
The true irony of this being that the best places to build the solar collectors/converters will be desert countries: Saharan Africa and the Middle east, where oil fields already exist. With the bonus that they have, or have near by, the facilities to transport and process crude. This ties back to laughing at hippies because it will mean NOTHING CHANGES, except for the fact the oil is now "carbon neutral".
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: mustard gas effect on November 25, 2015, 04:53:54 PM
Corbyn ally throws Mao's Little Red Book at UK's Osborne
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/corbyn-ally-throws-maos-little-red-book-uks-175936971.html#9fXh1t5 (https://uk.news.yahoo.com/corbyn-ally-throws-maos-little-red-book-uks-175936971.html#9fXh1t5)

Quote
Britain's Labour has been accused of lurching left since Jeremy Corbyn became leader, so when one of his key allies quoted Mao Zedong's Little Red Book in parliament Wednesday, Conservative opponents were delighted.

John McDonnell, the main opposition's finance spokesman, was giving his party's response to finance minister George Osborne's budget update in the House of Commons when he pulled out a copy of the Chinese revolutionary leader's book of quotations.

McDonnell started off by joking that it would assist Osborne, who is pushing for Britain to have closer economic ties with China, in "dealing with his new-found comrades".
Then he added: "Let me quote from Mao, rarely done in this chamber: 'We must learn to do economic work from all who know how.

"'No matter who they are, we must esteem them as teachers, learning from them respectfully and conscientiously. But we must not pretend to know what we do not know.'"
McDonnell then threw the book across the table between the Labour side and the government towards Osborne.

Prime Minister David Cameron's finance minister had just announced a fresh round of deep cuts to public spending, designed to shrink Britain's budget deficit.
Lawmakers from his centre-right Conservative party roared with delight at McDonnell's move, aware it would fuel perceptions of him and Corbyn, who became Labour leader in September, as radical leftwingers.

"So the shadow chancellor literally stood at the despatch box and read out from Mao's Little Red Book," Osborne said in response, adding: "Oh look! It's his personal signed copy" as he opened it.
Mao was the founding father of communist China, governing the country between 1949 and 1976.

The period was marked by turbulence, including the so-called great Leap Forward -- a modernisation initiative that many historians blame for causing a disastrous famine.
His best known sayings include: "Political power grows from the barrel of a gun" and "To read too many books is harmful".
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: tender of the rape garden on November 25, 2015, 05:20:47 PM
Corbyn ally throws Mao's Little Red Book at UK's Osborne
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/corbyn-ally-throws-maos-little-red-book-uks-175936971.html#9fXh1t5 (https://uk.news.yahoo.com/corbyn-ally-throws-maos-little-red-book-uks-175936971.html#9fXh1t5)

Quote
Britain's Labour has been accused of lurching left since Jeremy Corbyn became leader, so when one of his key allies quoted Mao Zedong's Little Red Book in parliament Wednesday, Conservative opponents were delighted.

John McDonnell, the main opposition's finance spokesman, was giving his party's response to finance minister George Osborne's budget update in the House of Commons when he pulled out a copy of the Chinese revolutionary leader's book of quotations.

McDonnell started off by joking that it would assist Osborne, who is pushing for Britain to have closer economic ties with China, in "dealing with his new-found comrades".
Then he added: "Let me quote from Mao, rarely done in this chamber: 'We must learn to do economic work from all who know how.

"'No matter who they are, we must esteem them as teachers, learning from them respectfully and conscientiously. But we must not pretend to know what we do not know.'"
McDonnell then threw the book across the table between the Labour side and the government towards Osborne.

Prime Minister David Cameron's finance minister had just announced a fresh round of deep cuts to public spending, designed to shrink Britain's budget deficit.
Lawmakers from his centre-right Conservative party roared with delight at McDonnell's move, aware it would fuel perceptions of him and Corbyn, who became Labour leader in September, as radical leftwingers.

"So the shadow chancellor literally stood at the despatch box and read out from Mao's Little Red Book," Osborne said in response, adding: "Oh look! It's his personal signed copy" as he opened it.
Mao was the founding father of communist China, governing the country between 1949 and 1976.

The period was marked by turbulence, including the so-called great Leap Forward -- a modernisation initiative that many historians blame for causing a disastrous famine.
His best known sayings include: "Political power grows from the barrel of a gun" and "To read too many books is harmful".

Ironically the little red book is not relevant to modern Chinese communism.

You know you're fucked up when you're out-commieing actual commies.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on November 26, 2015, 07:23:29 AM
Quote
The period was marked by turbulence, including the so-called great Leap Forward -- a modernisation initiative that many historians blame for causing a disastrous famine.

 :allears:

Let's try that one for Hitler shall we

Quote
The period was marked by turbulence, including the so-called Holocaust -- a modernisation initiative that many historians blame for inconveniencing non-aryans.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on December 10, 2015, 02:47:02 PM
So the UK apparently wants to ban trump.

I can see that being awkward if he manages to win.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on December 10, 2015, 07:16:06 PM
So the UK apparently wants to ban trump.

I can see that being awkward if he manages to win.
Not as much as they want to ban mudslimes

(http://i.imgur.com/qjrQkJs.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on December 11, 2015, 04:13:38 AM
It's outdated now, the trump one is over 500,000.

Its amusing to see "You have to block trump from coming over here, he's a hate preacher and we don't agree with his views" and then on the other petition the same people are going "you can't stop people coming here based on their beliefs! This is just anti muslim!".

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autism Therapy Chicken on December 11, 2015, 04:45:14 AM
The UK telling Trump he can't enter the country is kind of like the neighborhood cuckold saying you're not allowed to come watch his wife get banged.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on December 11, 2015, 07:16:08 AM
The UK telling Trump he can't enter the country is kind of like the neighborhood cuckold saying you're not allowed to come watch his wife get banged.

Even funnier is them saying that there are no such thing as no-go areas in the UK.

Roll up in a predominantly islamic neighborhood in your Mercedes Benz/nice suit/be white and see how long it takes until you're robbed and murdered.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on December 11, 2015, 11:19:16 AM
It would be like that scene in Coming to America where the second they leave their luggage unattended people just jump on it and run.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on December 12, 2015, 06:15:49 PM
Hardly anybody gave a shit when Trump, with his help from those in Scottish government, destroyed some of Scotland's coastal environment and fucked over and harrassed the locals to build a golf course.

He says some things in the US (more widely hyped on our media) that some find offensive and suddenly the pleb masses start signing petitions to keep him out en masse.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on January 01, 2016, 08:41:16 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/kKOLuWrl.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: cis scum 1.0 on January 03, 2016, 02:01:35 PM
so yeah turns out that when :farage: crashed his car, it was... an assassination attempt (not gamergate-related)

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/03/ukip-furious-after-details-of-assasination-attempt-against-farage-leaked/

:lilal:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Colonial Sanders on January 03, 2016, 02:30:47 PM
so yeah turns out that when :farage: crashed his car, it was... an assassination attempt (not gamergate-related)

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/03/ukip-furious-after-details-of-assasination-attempt-against-farage-leaked/

:lilal:

Huh.  Were there any questions raised about his plane crash?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on January 03, 2016, 03:43:03 PM
Most Based Euro politician.

Most politicians would be shouting this from the rooftops blaming evil rightwingers/leftists and gain a popularity surge but this dude is just pissed it became public
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: neat on January 03, 2016, 03:49:09 PM
Most Based Euro politician.



 :rpno:




(http://i.imgur.com/YBlZDBu.png)
vs
(http://i.imgur.com/K67G1WX.png)


Can't Turban The Orban.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: asip please thank you on January 03, 2016, 03:50:59 PM
I don't know the guy or anything about him, but if I was a PM of some euro hellhole I would definitely want the US to take all the Muslims far and away from me.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on January 08, 2016, 12:16:24 PM
The only man who's awake in Britain

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/08/2728817/

FARAGE FOR BREITBART: Pan-European Migrant Rape Story Response Highlights The Continent’s Unconditional Surrender
Quote
Events in Cologne are very shocking to people unless like me you’ve spent the last 17 years spending part of your time working in Brussels. The women there are sadly now molested regularly in certain districts.

My assistant in the European Parliament has been called a “bitch” and told to “cover up” on multiple occasions. And these are not isolated incidents.

These issues can be difficult to talk about. But perhaps people are starting to wake up.

The response to events in Cologne from the Mayor Henriette Reker amounts to an unconditional German surrender.

German girls in public actually dress and behave more conservatively than in many parts of the United Kingdom. Yet this intimidation from male migrants has led to the suggestion of a new code of conduct for German girls.

It amounts to a very deep insult that will be felt in Germany and right across Europe too.

The problem is very simple: if you let in large numbers of young, male migrants who come from a culture where women are thought of and treated differently, what do you expect?

Some of the migrants were even quoted as saying that Mrs. Merkel had welcomed them. They are of course right, she did. And what a terrible, historic mistake that has proven to have been.

Worse still are the cover-ups involved. The state broadcaster in Germany attempted to hush up events in Cologne and elsewhere. Instead of exposing what has been going on, much of the mainstream media decided to try and sweep it under the carpet instead.

It is all sadly reminiscent of what happened in this country in Rotherham and Rochdale when we saw a cover-up of the abuse and exploitation of young girls.

Sweden has massive problems as well. Swedish Democrats MEP Peter Lundgren has told me: “A Swedish police officer made the connection between Cologne and sexual harassment in Sweden.

“Sweden has a huge problem with sexual assaults and rapes carried out by young male Muslim migrants.

“The same thing happened in the Swedish town of Kalmar as took place in Cologne on New Year’s Eve.

“Indeed shootings, murder and sexual assaults are a regular occurrence in Swedish cities like Malmo.”

We can criticise Sweden and Germany but what about this country? Only this week we’re seeing serious discussion about the changing of the GCSE exam timetables to fit in with Ramadan.

It is clear that the West as a whole lacks cultural confidence. Quite frankly I’m tired of speeches from David Cameron and Theresa May who seek to assert values but do nothing. We get words but very little action.

These shocking scenes in Cologne are not far removed from us here in the United Kingdom. Whilst these men may not have EU passports, they soon will. They will then be free to come to the streets of Britain.

Ultimately this whole question of border controls, identity and security are issues on which the referendum will be determined. We are at a cross-roads as a country and a continent. For the good of our people and our nation, we must leave the European Union and start standing up for our Judeo-Christian heritage.

Nigel Farage MEP is leader of the UK Independence Party
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on January 08, 2016, 12:17:59 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RONUVzHApk
 :farage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on January 19, 2016, 03:16:09 AM
Muslims in Britain being expected to learn & improve their English to earn/keep citizenships, Muslims scream racism.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/muslim-women-must-learn-english-or-risk-deportation-british-pm/ar-BBollpj?ocid=ansmsnnews11

 :farage:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on February 04, 2016, 01:02:05 PM
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-students-badger-culling-social-7294843

Students organise badger hunt pub crawl, where one group (the girls, usually) dress up in black and white (badgers) and start a pub crawl. When the hunters go, they have to catch up, downing a pint at each pub on the way.

Clearly this is disgraceful and must be stopped. I actually know one of the cunts who's angry at this too. Funnily enough she was a tosser at parties too.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: AssPoundingFaggot on February 04, 2016, 04:15:39 PM
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-students-badger-culling-social-7294843

Students organise badger hunt pub crawl, where one group (the girls, usually) dress up in black and white (badgers) and start a pub crawl. When the hunters go, they have to catch up, downing a pint at each pub on the way.

Clearly this is disgraceful and must be stopped. I actually know one of the cunts who's angry at this too. Funnily enough she was a tosser at parties too.

Wow, whole lotta butthurt in Fognigger land over some stupid badgers. From the comments:

Quote
If I were a pub owner in York I would ban them, permanently. There is nothing "fun" about a badger cull. It is particularly not "fun" when a badger dies in front of you, as I've had the experience of in a badger cull zone. Badger culls being held in some of the UKs best holiday destinations, during the summer season, sometimes actually starting on a bank holiday, does enormous harm to the economics of those communities. It also pits neighbor against neighbor and causes huge social division, and with roads being illegally closed by the police creates as close to a civil war in the British countryside as I have seen since the miners strikes in the 1980's. I hope the other students at York University are appalled by their Tory classmates idea of "fun" and set up a 'stop the badger cull' group and get active in the field. The rest of York should name and shame these morons, photograph them, and ban them from the fun social spaces of York. They are a disgrace.

I now have an urge to go badger hunting simply out of spite.

 :cumia:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on February 04, 2016, 04:19:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByAcYqiYHA4
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on February 06, 2016, 03:00:47 AM
I can't find the general niggerdom thread, and Aussies are close enough to Limeys.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/woman-walks-into-own-funeral-to-surprise-of-husband-who-had-paid-to-have-her-killed/ar-BBpaQJa?ocid=ansmsnnews11

Aussie Nigger Immigrant marries other Nigger Immigrant, husband arranges to have her killed. Family connections get her off, surprises husband at her funeral.

The only sad part of this story is no niggers were killed, they have had 8 nigglets.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Strategically placed watermelon on February 18, 2016, 11:40:20 PM
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on February 19, 2016, 05:45:00 AM
Lol and thats just non uk born citizens. Add in all recent immigrants and its twice as bad
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hairsniffer1983 on February 19, 2016, 09:24:28 AM
It's more than you think, anyone from an EEA country is eligible for the same benefits as a citizen once they've lived in the UK for three months, and anyone with refugee status.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: brolonium on February 20, 2016, 12:58:21 AM
Like we all know, you can have immigration OR welfare.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on February 20, 2016, 10:08:46 PM
Like we all know, you can have immigration OR welfare.

Correct.

The crazy goon Libertarian idea of totally open borders, could maybe sorta (kinda) work on paper if there was zero government gibz at all.  In theory, I guess maybe you could do this but then "gibz" would have to include even the little shit like free roads and public schools and what not.  You would have to get rid of ALL of that free shit or your open borders will fail.

Like why would you live in Mexico with dirt roads when you can move to the USA with paved roads? Even without the welfare payments, the USA is still a better place to live simply because of the infrastructure. 

Basically, as long as the "free rider problem" is a thing that exists, you can't have open borders (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_rider_problem).  I've never really heard of a good way to totally eliminate free riders, especially not in a democracy.  Voters LOVE free riding, and will always vote for more of it if given the chance.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on April 05, 2016, 08:38:29 AM
There's a good UK/EU TV license shaming thread on 4chan.

(http://i.imgur.com/mf7Fxfk.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/2hV2GcX.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/RYbEROy.png)

Atleast they get this high quality programming for it:
(http://i.imgur.com/o2BEMkZ.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Handyman on April 05, 2016, 08:45:59 AM
What is TV licensing?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on April 05, 2016, 08:46:43 AM
What is TV licensing?
It's like a car registration, but for a TV.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hairsniffer1983 on April 05, 2016, 09:04:54 AM
In the UK if you own a TV you're required to pay for a license to fund the BBC under threats of prosecution. Your money usually goes to a sloppy mess of shit original programming, news coverage of government bordering on fellatio, creepy 'we will track you down for not paying' ads, and institutional protection for career paedophiles. It's pretty much a national embarrassment.

Top Gear and all the Attenborough documentaries were great, but other than that the whole mess needs flushing like a bad hangover turd in a public toilet.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Handyman on April 05, 2016, 11:53:38 AM
In the UK if you own a TV you're required to pay for a license to fund the BBC under threats of prosecution. Your money usually goes to a sloppy mess of shit original programming, news coverage of government bordering on fellatio, creepy 'we will track you down for not paying' ads, and institutional protection for career paedophiles. It's pretty much a national embarrassment.

Top Gear and all the Attenborough documentaries were great, but other than that the whole mess needs flushing like a bad hangover turd in a public toilet.

Why don't they just charge cable/satellite providers that fee?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 05, 2016, 12:00:33 PM
Top Gear and all the Attenborough documentaries were great, but other than that the whole mess needs flushing like a bad hangover turd in a public toilet.

Speaking of Top Gear, the way that the BBC handled the Clarkson fiasco will go down in history as one of the worst crisis management cases of all time. All they had to do was make Clarkson publicly apologize, throw a few fines and penalties at him and that's it. Instead they chose to lose possibly the most famous TV show of its kind of all times.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Whig Historian on April 05, 2016, 12:18:56 PM
Top Gear and all the Attenborough documentaries were great, but other than that the whole mess needs flushing like a bad hangover turd in a public toilet.

Speaking of Top Gear, the way that the BBC handled the Clarkson fiasco will go down in history as one of the worst crisis management cases of all time. All they had to do was make Clarkson publicly apologize, throw a few fines and penalties at him and that's it. Instead they chose to lose possibly the most famous TV show of its kind of all times.
Or, from their perspective, it finally gave them an excuse to get rid of that horrible, low-class ruffian, so he could be replaced by someone with Correct Opinions. Only middle-class strivers who don't know their place care about trivialities like popularity-driven advertising revenue, and they certainly wouldn't want to be one of those.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on April 05, 2016, 01:18:31 PM
In the UK if you own a TV you're required to pay for a license to fund the BBC under threats of prosecution. Your money usually goes to a sloppy mess of shit original programming, news coverage of government bordering on fellatio, creepy 'we will track you down for not paying' ads, and institutional protection for career paedophiles. It's pretty much a national embarrassment.

Top Gear and all the Attenborough documentaries were great, but other than that the whole mess needs flushing like a bad hangover turd in a public toilet.

Why don't they just charge cable/satellite providers that fee?
people is europe will pay it. Imagine having to pay 300 bucks a year for one shitty channel. Im assuming thats per mhousehold and not per tv. Thered be riots
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on April 05, 2016, 01:38:02 PM
In the UK if you own a TV you're required to pay for a license to fund the BBC under threats of prosecution. Your money usually goes to a sloppy mess of shit original programming, news coverage of government bordering on fellatio, creepy 'we will track you down for not paying' ads, and institutional protection for career paedophiles. It's pretty much a national embarrassment.

Top Gear and all the Attenborough documentaries were great, but other than that the whole mess needs flushing like a bad hangover turd in a public toilet.
Meanwhile in America we get all the best BBC programming on PBS paid for by the Koch brothers.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hairsniffer1983 on April 05, 2016, 01:41:38 PM
people is europe will pay it. Imagine having to pay 300 bucks a year for one shitty channel. Im assuming thats per mhousehold and not per tv. Thered be riots
Per household.

There was some piss weak handwringy proposition a while back about decriminalising non-payment because it was clogging up the courts, shitloads of people obviously don't want to pay a gang of government thugs just for owning a TV and told them to go fuck themselves. Didn't go anywhere and they're back to carpet bombing threatening letters to any residence without a license and bringing people to court by the thousand again.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 05, 2016, 04:09:52 PM
There's a loophole that if you don't watch anything live you don't have the pay the license, so people just watch "on demand" tv a minute behind the actual broadcast. I don't know anyone who actually pays that ridiculous license, who is under the age of 30
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ethnic Minority Stock Image on April 08, 2016, 06:18:05 PM
BBC News is still OK compared to the other choices and a lot of the documentary stuff is good (but sometimes god awful). I can't think of anything else I didn't find shit.

Oh, and what that BBC trending thing is about social media trending stories and issues - so I'd imagine that the typical Twitter twat is partly to blame for that.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on April 08, 2016, 06:21:03 PM
BBC News is still OK compared to the other choices and a lot of the documentary stuff is good (but sometimes god awful). I can't think of anything else I didn't find shit.

Oh, and what that BBC trending thing is about social media trending stories and issues - so I'd imagine that the typical Twitter twat is partly to blame for that.

Think about how average/shitty they are when they collect 250 bucks a year from every household in the country. All that cash for just one channel.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on April 09, 2016, 03:16:17 AM
Think about how average/shitty they are when they collect 250 bucks a year from every household in the country. All that cash for just one channel.

It's not one channel. It's a total of 25 channels in the UK plus BBC Worldwide channels. And 50+ radio channels. And the website.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blakks are not very cool on April 09, 2016, 01:14:00 PM
Think about how average/shitty they are when they collect 250 bucks a year from every household in the country. All that cash for just one channel.

It's not one channel. It's a total of 25 channels in the UK plus BBC Worldwide channels. And 50+ radio channels. And the website.

Trying to justify the thousands of pounds you've given to the government for your "TV License".
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on April 09, 2016, 03:06:22 PM
For about 600 bucks a year i get over 1200 channels, most in hidef. Radio is free here
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on April 09, 2016, 03:18:18 PM
Think about how average/shitty they are when they collect 250 bucks a year from every household in the country. All that cash for just one channel.

It's not one channel. It's a total of 25 channels in the UK plus BBC Worldwide channels. And 50+ radio channels. And the website.

Trying to justify the thousands of pounds you've given to the government for your "TV License".

Nope. Just specifying that the $6 billion they bring in each year is paying for more than one channel.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 09, 2016, 04:48:49 PM
That six billion is better off in the pockets of British workers HTH
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on April 09, 2016, 09:53:19 PM
So with the whole Brexit debate going on, i think there's something to take into account; and that's the fact that the polls are either tied or giving the leave camp a small lead, normally this isn't something to make a fuss about, but the people who are voting to leave seem much more determined to go out and vote in comparison to the remain camp.

Young voters are Pro EU but would much rather stay at home, and the old people are Anti EU and are much more likely to go out and vote.

All in all, the UK may very well leave the EU this year.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on April 09, 2016, 10:13:22 PM
I predict that the vote is in favor of the UK staying in the EU by a thin margin.  People in the UK know they're getting fucked by staying in the EU but they are too afraid/comfortable to make sudden changes.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Wehrmacht Bitches At on April 10, 2016, 01:08:22 AM
I doubt brexit will happen, all things considered. (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-02/wikileaks-reveals-imf-plan-cause-credit-event-greece-and-destabilize-europe)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on April 10, 2016, 02:04:19 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqG4ysu2ksU
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 10, 2016, 05:30:53 AM
I doubt brexit will happen, all things considered. (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-02/wikileaks-reveals-imf-plan-cause-credit-event-greece-and-destabilize-europe)

To be completely honest, I think shit like this (especially if it turns out to be true), will make the Brexit more likely, not less.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on April 10, 2016, 05:32:46 AM
I doubt brexit will happen, all things considered. (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-02/wikileaks-reveals-imf-plan-cause-credit-event-greece-and-destabilize-europe)

To be completely honest, I think shit like this (especially if it turns out to be true), will make the Brexit more likely, not less.
The powerful rich making bank of the EU shenanigans will rig the vote and make sure it doesn't happen.   See:  Bernie Sanders, Donald Tump and "magic delegates".

They'll find a way.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 10, 2016, 05:38:00 AM
I doubt brexit will happen, all things considered. (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-02/wikileaks-reveals-imf-plan-cause-credit-event-greece-and-destabilize-europe)

To be completely honest, I think shit like this (especially if it turns out to be true), will make the Brexit more likely, not less.
The powerful rich making bank of the EU shenanigans will rig the vote and make sure it doesn't happen.   See:  Bernie Sanders, Donald Tump and "magic delegates".

They'll find a way.

I think these cons are getting a little too big even for anyone to pull off. But I guess we'll see soon enough. It's going to be an exciting, if somewhat terrifying year.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 10, 2016, 08:32:01 AM
Every single person i've talked to is in favour of leaving purely because of the cost of staying in. It seems like most people were ok with it when they didn't realise how much we're flushing down the drain, while at the same time complaining that we can't afford our healthcare service and our gimmedats.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on April 10, 2016, 08:36:07 AM
LOL if you think your taxes will go down by leaving the EU.  They will just import more third world detritus instead to bridge the gap.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 10, 2016, 08:37:38 AM
To be completely honest, I think UK is one of those countries that is gone. I mean Londonistan is already lost and not a force in the world will be able to get it back and more major cities are likely following suite. So Germany, France, UK... yeah Europe is fucked.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 10, 2016, 08:43:38 AM
LOL if you think your taxes will go down by leaving the EU.  They will just import more third world detritus instead to bridge the gap.

I'm not talking about taxes, I'm talking about re-purposing the money that goes into the EU to improve the UK before its too late, if its not past saving already. Why pay to bail out some shithole country that can't handle its own shit while we have problems here.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on April 10, 2016, 09:49:09 AM
LOL if you think your taxes will go down by leaving the EU.  They will just import more third world detritus instead to bridge the gap.

I'm not talking about taxes, I'm talking about re-purposing the money that goes into the EU to improve the UK before its too late, if its not past saving already. Why pay to bail out some shithole country that can't handle its own shit while we have problems here.

I guess what I meant to say is that any money that no longer gets used for the EU will just go to bringing in more immigrants, which is the EU's primary goal anyway it seems in CURRENT YEAR.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 10, 2016, 09:52:00 AM
I need to have some hope man  :myecred:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hairsniffer1983 on April 11, 2016, 04:53:35 AM
tbh it's probably not going to make much difference either way. It's a courtesy vote to give the voters something to do, in or out the UK's role in Europe will be structured however they've already decided it's going to be anyway.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on April 11, 2016, 04:59:14 AM
tbh it's probably not going to make much difference either way. It's a courtesy vote to give the voters something to do, in or out the UK's role in Europe will be structured however they've already decided it's going to be anyway.
What? UK leaving the EU would be a yuuuuge deal.  For the entire continent.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hairsniffer1983 on April 11, 2016, 05:03:51 AM
It seems that way, but for some reason I suspect some sort of pre-agreed deal to maintain the status quo no matter what happens. Maybe it'll be different this time and something we can vote on will actually make the slightest bit of difference.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on April 11, 2016, 01:08:30 PM
Britain coming out of the EU would cost them one of their top five contributors, which is a fucking huge deal considering the pittance most countries contribute. It's mainly the top five propping up the rest.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: [SWOLE]Grode Jar on April 12, 2016, 08:36:26 AM
In the UK if you own a TV you're required to pay for a license to fund the BBC under threats of prosecution. Your money usually goes to a sloppy mess of shit original programming, news coverage of government bordering on fellatio, creepy 'we will track you down for not paying' ads, and institutional protection for career paedophiles. It's pretty much a national embarrassment.

Top Gear and all the Attenborough documentaries were great, but other than that the whole mess needs flushing like a bad hangover turd in a public toilet.

:psyduck:

A license for a TV?  No wonder you euros live in apartments the size of one of the 3 non-master bedrooms in my house, you have no money for anything thanks to all of your taxes and fees.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hairsniffer1983 on April 12, 2016, 08:56:57 AM
:psyduck:

A license for a TV?  No wonder you euros live in apartments the size of one of the 3 non-master bedrooms in my house, you have no money for anything thanks to all of your taxes and fees.

That and 65 million people living on an island half the size of California. Space is expensive yo.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on April 12, 2016, 11:01:15 AM
Also, a lot of taxation goes to provide for the underclass, both native and non-native. Need more money for them programs, guv'nah!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Uncle Touchy on April 12, 2016, 11:20:29 AM
:psyduck:

A license for a TV?  No wonder you euros live in apartments the size of one of the 3 non-master bedrooms in my house, you have no money for anything thanks to all of your taxes and fees.

That and 65 million people living on an island half the size of California. Space is expensive yo.

No doubt that Europe has a higher tax burden for the average citizen... but the relative lack of area is something that most Americans tend to not think about. Even if you factor out the various uninhabited wastelands of Alaska and the Southwest desert, America still has less than half the population density of western Europe. Comparatively speaking, real estate has always been dirt cheap on this side of the pond.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Handyman on April 12, 2016, 11:30:41 AM
That's also why most of us think that public transit sucks a big fat dick.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on April 12, 2016, 11:34:49 AM
:psyduck:

A license for a TV?  No wonder you euros live in apartments the size of one of the 3 non-master bedrooms in my house, you have no money for anything thanks to all of your taxes and fees.

That and 65 million people living on an island half the size of California. Space is expensive yo.

No doubt that Europe has a higher tax burden for the average citizen... but the relative lack of area is something that most Americans tend to not think about. Even if you factor out the various uninhabited wastelands of Alaska and the Southwest desert, America still has less than half the population density of western Europe. Comparatively speaking, real estate has always been dirt cheap on this side of the pond.

its also why we care more about cars and we have shittier internet (although thats catching up slowly)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on April 14, 2016, 10:24:27 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFXSj5WofYA

This guy is pretty fun to listen to, there's alot of memorable quotes in this video alone.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on April 14, 2016, 10:46:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFXSj5WofYA

This guy is pretty fun to listen to, there's alot of memorable quotes in this video alone.

Yeah :farage: fucking rules so hard.   I also love Daniel Hannan too.  He's not nearly as funny, and good with the insult bombs, but IMO he's a little more intellectual and gives great lectures on interesting topics.  Here are a few of my favorites.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufyov9RO8I0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QaZEGcoGXo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uep7GA9hCKM

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on April 15, 2016, 03:20:15 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFXSj5WofYA

This guy is pretty fun to listen to, there's alot of memorable quotes in this video alone.
What's with the papers those two chucklefucks are holding up behind him?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on April 15, 2016, 10:48:13 AM
It features the "accomplishments" of the Baroness he talks about in the video, that's a picture of the woman.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on April 16, 2016, 06:43:19 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CgHY3izUIAEOSeW.jpg)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: hairsniffer1983 on April 18, 2016, 04:23:52 AM


Why do you have to ruin my Monday so early. Fucks sake.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: mustard gas effect on April 20, 2016, 02:55:04 PM
Tommy Robinson is a god among men

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kyjTHs6Rts
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 21, 2016, 06:01:26 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/education-36094328

1. Black? Yes.
2. Muslim? Oh yes indeed.
3. Terrorist sympathizer? You betcha!

Boys we got ourselves a triple combo!
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Duwango on April 22, 2016, 06:06:33 PM
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/7096296/Barack-Obama-says-US-has-stake-in-Brexit-vote-because-of-WWII.html

Like the perpetually aggrieved cokehead he is, Barry cries and whines for attention, even from Britbongers.

On the side note, in the event Brexit comes to pass, that'll be Barry's 2nd (unintentional) accomplishment in life, along with the intense spike in gun-related sales and job creation.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 23, 2016, 06:36:40 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3555044/BBC-says-one-six-stars-gay-lesbian-disabled-2020.html

Quote
One in six of all on-screen BBC roles must go to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender or disabled people by 2020, the corporation's new diversity targets state.

BBC  :allears:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on April 23, 2016, 09:51:54 PM
Isn't the whole point of being a tranny that people aren't supposed to instantly tell you're a tranny?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on April 23, 2016, 10:15:31 PM
How will they know if someone's "lesbian, gay or bisexual"?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on April 23, 2016, 10:50:42 PM
I thought every British actor is a faggot so what exactly will change with this new rule
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on April 24, 2016, 06:45:21 AM
Like the perpetually aggrieved cokehead he is, Barry cries and whines for attention, even from Britbongers.

Quote
Speaking in the Foreign Office’s grand Locarno Room, the president also clashed bitterly with Boris over the London Mayor’s claim in an article in The Sun yesterday that he didn’t care for Britain and returned a bust of Winston Churchill to our embassy in Washington DC.

Countering, Mr Obama insisted he still kept a bust of the legendary wartime PM outside his private study in the White House residence on its second floor, where he said “I can do anything”.

He added: “I see it every day — including on weekends when I’m going into that office to watch a basketball game.

“I love Winston Churchill, I love the guy.”

A Churchill bust had only been removed from the Oval Office because Mr Obama wanted to replace it with one of famous civil rights campaigner Dr Martin Luther King, he argued, explaining: “I thought it was appropriate - and I think most people in the United Kingdom might agree — as the first African American president."

Only Obama would be so classless as to try and race bait a foreign country.

:facepalm:

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on April 24, 2016, 01:30:24 PM
Obama: "We consider it a major national security issue that you have uncontrolled migration into Europe."

— CNN Breaking News (@cnnbrk) April 22, 2016

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/04/22/remarks-president-obama-and-prime-minister-cameron-joint-press

Hypocrisy much?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on April 25, 2016, 07:34:59 PM
How will they know if someone's "lesbian, gay or bisexual"?

Same way you always find out such things.

(http://i63.tinypic.com/nwatzl.png)
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 27, 2016, 10:26:37 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTlr0707vLU

Flags are racist.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on April 27, 2016, 01:07:52 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTlr0707vLU

Flags are racist.
Nice to know that fuckups still cower before tyranny.

Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 29, 2016, 03:15:09 PM
Why can't the Brits just leave flags alone?

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/29/england-flag-banned-eurovision/

Quote
The flags of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will be banned from the arena at this year’s Eurovision Song Contest, but the European Union and Rainbow flags will be permitted.

However, the rules forbid the flying of “local, regional and provincial flags”. A spokesman confirmed to Breitbart London that this will include the flags of the constituent countries of the UK.

The spokesman said that the policy “is not aimed against any organisation or territory specifically”, but nonetheless admitted that “flags from Scotland for example would not be permitted since it does not fall into either of these categories.”

The document does, however, expressly permit the European Union and Rainbow flags “provided they will… not be used as tool to intentionally make a political statement during the show.”

 :jesse:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on April 29, 2016, 07:31:51 PM
But I thought the flag of the EU is the rainbow flag?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 30, 2016, 06:26:35 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoOSGweEzNs

 :tuss:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Chillbro Swaggins on April 30, 2016, 01:43:28 PM
There really is no hope of them ever coming back is there?

U.K. Considering Regulating Ads to Make Sure the Women In Them Aren’t Too Hot

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/434764/uk-advertising-agencies-feature-unrealistic-women
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on April 30, 2016, 02:07:37 PM
There really is no hope of them ever coming back is there?

U.K. Considering Regulating Ads to Make Sure the Women In Them Aren’t Too Hot

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/434764/uk-advertising-agencies-feature-unrealistic-women

Quote
“We’re serious about making sure we’re alive to changing attitudes and behaviours,” he said, according to the release. “That’s why we’ve already been taking action to ban ads that we believe reinforce gender stereotypes and that are likely to cause serious and widespread offence, or harm.”

 :razor:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Obese and Triggered on April 30, 2016, 03:59:56 PM
There really is no hope of them ever coming back is there?

U.K. Considering Regulating Ads to Make Sure the Women In Them Aren’t Too Hot

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/434764/uk-advertising-agencies-feature-unrealistic-women

THe author: 

(http://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/katherine-timpf.jpg)

I think she needs to be censured for promoting unrealistic standards of beauty in reporting. Preferably by spanking or perhaps a few hours of community service housework at my place in some kind of frilly, lacy thing.

:allears:
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on April 30, 2016, 04:05:41 PM
From my time in Europe, women in the UK are the ugliest I've ever seen (granted, I haven't been to India or any African country).  Lad mag models like Gemma Atkinson or Keeley Hazell are extreme rarities.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on April 30, 2016, 04:37:15 PM
From my time in Europe, women in the UK are the ugliest I've ever seen (granted, I haven't been to India or any African country).  Lad mag models like Gemma Atkinson or Keeley Hazell are extreme rarities.

I know a dude who was recently transferred from his firm's Prague branch to the Edinburgh one and the drop-off in tail quality has left him severely depressed. And Scottish women tend to be better than Englishwomen.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on April 30, 2016, 04:44:23 PM
There really is no hope of them ever coming back is there?

U.K. Considering Regulating Ads to Make Sure the Women In Them Aren’t Too Hot

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/434764/uk-advertising-agencies-feature-unrealistic-women

THe author: 

(http://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/katherine-timpf.jpg)

I think she needs to be censured for promoting unrealistic standards of beauty in reporting. Preferably by spanking or perhaps a few hours of community service housework at my place in some kind of frilly, lacy thing.

:allears:

She's not doing blondes any favors with these sort of articles.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on May 02, 2016, 03:26:02 AM
From my time in Europe, women in the UK are the ugliest I've ever seen (granted, I haven't been to India or any African country).  Lad mag models like Gemma Atkinson or Keeley Hazell are extreme rarities.

idk where you went, but london isnt india or an african country?
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 02, 2016, 04:02:20 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/01/jeremy-corbyn-called-convicted-terrorist-an-iconic-figure/

Quote
Jeremy Corbyn described a convicted terrorist accused of plotting a series of suicide attacks in Israel as an “icon” and compared him to Nelson Mandela.

In a post now deleted from Mr Corbyn’s website, the Labour leader described Marwan Barghouti as an “iconic figure for ordinary Palestinians”.

Barghouti was convicted of organising attacks against Israeli civilians and allegedly founded the Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigade, a designated terrorist organisation.

What the fuck is wrong with Corbyn?

Also interesting sidenote, all the commies in the UK megathread on SA just seem to love him.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: URANIUM CURES HIPPIES on May 02, 2016, 05:40:55 AM
Corbyn is old-skool Labour, that being a classic social democrat straight out of the pre-Thatcher years. At least he isn't a Tony Blair clone like most of his competition in the party.

Him supporting Palestinian terrorists/freedom fighters isn't surprising, since they've been part of the socialist bloc since forever.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 04, 2016, 04:31:57 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3572015/Sadiq-Khan-branded-unfit-London-Mayor-emerges-called-moderate-Muslim-s-Uncle-Toms.html

Turns out that even Londonistan has its limits when it comes to "diversity".
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on May 04, 2016, 09:12:06 AM
Lol there really are no good ones.
Title: Re: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on May 04, 2016, 09:36:47 AM
Lol there really are no good ones.

I disagree, they have made something of an artform of gooding themselves for thousands of years.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on May 06, 2016, 05:05:05 AM
So did you limey cucks really elect a mudslime mayor for Londonistan?  Lol.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 06, 2016, 02:22:49 PM
For fucks sake London  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 06, 2016, 03:47:53 PM
Nice going, guys. Incredible.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 06, 2016, 10:32:00 PM
This is going to blow up in their faces I can feel it.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on May 07, 2016, 02:34:31 AM
(http://puu.sh/oJaiW/aafdf2413c.png)

although its funny, its more depressing than anything else because its a window into the future of all white nations when whites are no longer the majority
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on May 07, 2016, 04:54:29 AM
I reckon the Trumpening is a sign that the US is learning from Europe, maybe even before it's too late here.

Fingers (and other things) crossed anyway.

Anyone got a match?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 05:16:49 AM
(http://puu.sh/oJaiW/aafdf2413c.png)

although its funny, its more depressing than anything else because its a window into the future of all white nations when whites are no longer the majority

The race data is always inaccurate because they never count mixed race people.

if someone is half black and half white they jettison the white parentage for the statistics and it's full on black despite the person having caucasian ancestry. hell look at tiger woods, call him one of the most sucessful asain golf players and people will correct you even though by the same standard you would be right.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on May 07, 2016, 09:28:38 AM
So did you limey cucks really elect a mudslime mayor for Londonistan?  Lol.

And for bonus points - the "conservative" alternative was a Jew.

Who is, of course, also pro-cucking:

https://twitter.com/zacgoldsmith/status/590401837393694720
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 07, 2016, 11:33:17 AM
So did you limey cucks really elect a mudslime mayor for Londonistan?  Lol.

And for bonus points - the "conservative" alternative was a Jew.

Who is, of course, also pro-cucking:

https://twitter.com/zacgoldsmith/status/590401837393694720

Heh, talk about being between a rock and a hard place...
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: European Cuckdom on May 07, 2016, 12:25:15 PM
Let's take a look at the career of Sir Goldsmith:

-expelled from Eton after drugs were found in his room

-appointed editor of some random cuck ecology magazine by Edward Goldsmith, his uncle

-never had a real job in his life and basically lived off daddy's allowance for at least 30 of the last 40 years (became a politician in 2005)

The perfect symbol of everything that is wrong with the British upper class: entitled, spoiled, incompetent, unqualified and unfuckable.

In a just world, he would be living in some miserable dump of a council house in Tower Hamlets/East Londonistan, struggling to make ends meet, while his 14yo ex-wife gets impregnated by some somali gang dindu.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on May 07, 2016, 01:17:45 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/yhOd1ka.jpg)
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 01:34:07 PM
Remove the English flag and put up an Israeli flag.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Bad Goy on May 07, 2016, 02:03:39 PM
(http://puu.sh/oJaiW/aafdf2413c.png)

although its funny, its more depressing than anything else because its a window into the future of all white nations when whites are no longer the majority

I tried looking up the racial demographics of Paris to compare, turns out they don't even publish the data.  :tuss:

Berlin is allegedly 71% ethnic Germans, the migrant hordes should fix that.   
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on May 07, 2016, 02:34:57 PM
Well it's been like 7 hours.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=138_1462619198
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on May 07, 2016, 02:40:23 PM
Let's take a look at the career of Sir Goldsmith:

-expelled from Eton after drugs were found in his room

-appointed editor of some random cuck ecology magazine by Edward Goldsmith, his uncle

-never had a real job in his life and basically lived off daddy's allowance for at least 30 of the last 40 years (became a politician in 2005)

The perfect symbol of everything that is wrong with the British upper class: entitled, spoiled, incompetent, unqualified and unfuckable.

In a just world, he would be living in some miserable dump of a council house in Tower Hamlets/East Londonistan, struggling to make ends meet, while his 14yo ex-wife gets impregnated by some somali gang dindu.

All of the London mayors have been trainwrecks:

Ken Livingstone - Got kicked out of Labour for being too far to the left.

Boris Johnson - (http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03296/election-best-bori_3296441b.jpg)

Now it's a mudslime.  British politics, like Britain itself, is a total disaster beyond salvaging.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on May 07, 2016, 03:24:17 PM
So as Trump is MAGA along, the rest of the west is going to decline into brown chaos. So basically America will be the only nice house left on the block, and we'll have loads and loads of guns to keep it that way.

But hey, Europe. Its not all bad. Societies that have flourished for millenia dying of self inflicted disease, cultures of unspeakable beauty being crushed beneath the feet of violent ingrates, the complete loss of safety outside and speech in your own home, yeah. But at least you aren't racist.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on May 07, 2016, 03:33:44 PM
So as Trump is MAGA along, the rest of the west is going to decline into brown chaos. So basically America will be the only nice house left on the block, and we'll have loads and loads of guns to keep it that way.

But hey, Europe. Its not all bad. Societies that have flourished for millenia dying of self inflicted disease, cultures of unspeakable beauty being crushed beneath the feet of violent ingrates, the complete loss of safety outside and speech in your own home, yeah. But at least you aren't racist.

There are a number of parallels you can make with the German vandal armies and the Roman Empire.  Romans used to defeat them and kept them at bay.  Then they started hiring them to fight wars for the Romans.  Then they had "no choice" but to make these foreign mercenaries Roman citizens.  Unsurprisingly all it did was just increase the flow of hostile warriors into the empire where a few decades later, they sacked Rome in 410.

Europeans have had a history of willingly letting in hostile forces in the name of tolerance.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 04:17:14 PM
So how many people would we need to sack both Saudi Arabia and Iran at the same time to the point where they can no longer function as a country and be conquered by western powers?

I'm perfectly ok with being tolerant to mulsims, just after we get rid of the places that are funding their radical urges.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on May 07, 2016, 04:50:52 PM
I'm perfectly ok with being tolerant to mulsims

They are perfectly ok with you being killed for not being one, fyi. That is how it goes in countries where Islam is the law. They will kill you, tolerance and all. You should be perfectly okay with cracking a few history books and maybe looking around at the world in which we live. I'd be perfectly okay with you not posting until you understand the menace that is Islam.

How many ants are you perfectly okay with having in your house? Probably none, which is the ideal. No ants. Now is it likely your house is 100% ant-free right now? No, probably not, but when you see a lone ant you know its a scout and you kill it before it finds food and leads a trail back to the hive. This lone ant didn't even really have any malice towards you, he is just scouting for food. So lets say hey, lets tolerate this ant. Well, within a few days, you're gonna find a trail between their hive and some source of food in your house. Maybe its the garbage. But hey its just a little trail and they aren't biting you yet and all they are doing is eating garbage, no need to call an exterminator. But a few more scouts get into a bag of chips that had a little opening, or the dog food, and then you begin to have an infestation. But the ants aren't biting YOU or anything, so who cares. Well eventually the ants will take over the entire house, and they will bite and sting you, as they bite and sting ANY LIVING THING that is not an ant from their hill. Even other ants of the exact species. So now you have two choices. Stay in your home until you are bitten and stung to death, or leave your home. Too late to call an exterminator, the problem has escalated too far.

Muslims are like ants. You probably can't keep them 100% out of your country but if you ignore the problem long enough, (or worse, exacerbate and encourage it), the infestation becomes complete and you either die or you leave your nation and its culture behind.

But where will you go? Good luck with that because when Trump is MAGA, we are not taking in the brainwashed masses who let their countries get infested with ants.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 04:58:58 PM
I'm perfectly ok with being tolerant to mulsims

They are perfectly ok with you being killed for not being one, fyi. That is how it goes in countries where Islam is the law. They will kill you, tolerance and all. You should be perfectly okay with cracking a few history books and maybe looking around at the world in which we live. I'd be perfectly okay with you not posting until you understand the menace that is Islam.

How many ants are you perfectly okay with having in your house? Probably none, which is the ideal. No ants. Now is it likely your house is 100% ant-free right now? No, probably not, but when you see a lone ant you know its a scout and you kill it before it finds food and leads a trail back to the hive. This lone ant didn't even really have any malice towards you, he is just scouting for food. So lets say hey, lets tolerate this ant. Well, within a few days, you're gonna find a trail between their hive and some source of food in your house. Maybe its the garbage. But hey its just a little trail and they aren't biting you yet and all they are doing is eating garbage, no need to call an exterminator. But a few more scouts get into a bag of chips that had a little opening, or the dog food, and then you begin to have an infestation. But the ants aren't biting YOU or anything, so who cares. Well eventually the ants will take over the entire house, and they will bite and sting you, as they bite and sting ANY LIVING THING that is not an ant from their hill. Even other ants of the exact species. So now you have two choices. Stay in your home until you are bitten and stung to death, or leave your home. Too late to call an exterminator, the problem has escalated too far.

Muslims are like ants. You probably can't keep them 100% out of your country but if you ignore the problem long enough, (or worse, exacerbate and encourage it), the infestation becomes complete and you either die or you leave your nation and its culture behind.

But where will you go? Good luck with that because when Trump is MAGA, we are not taking in the brainwashed masses who let their countries get infested with ants.

You missed the whole being tolerant to them after we annihilate all the retarded muslims.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on May 07, 2016, 05:12:59 PM
I'm perfectly ok with being tolerant to mulsims

They are perfectly ok with you being killed for not being one, fyi. That is how it goes in countries where Islam is the law. They will kill you, tolerance and all. You should be perfectly okay with cracking a few history books and maybe looking around at the world in which we live. I'd be perfectly okay with you not posting until you understand the menace that is Islam.

I posted before about Muslims believing everything is the will of Allah, and speaking against the will of Allah is a very bad thing. Understanding this will help you understand why "moderate" muslims generally won't condemn ISIS.

ISIS says they were able to take power due to the Will of Allah. If you say you're doing something because its the Will of Allah and it isn't, Allah will make you fail and possibly smite you down. So ISIS says "by the will of Will of Allah we will take the levant!" and they do, so shit that MUST be the will of Allah.

ISIS says its the will of Allah that faggots need to be tossed off of tall buildings until dead. Its in the Koran, and Allah isn't striking them down for executing faggots. That must be Allah's will*. Burning people alive? They're still doing it, must be Allah's will. 12 year old sex slaves? Allah's will, obviously.

These might be things that Muslim would never dream of doing themselves, and might even think they are wrong to do, but will never say so. That's how you get Allah'd and cast into pork-hell with the infidelsw and Jews.

(There is some further faggot 888 about how ISIS declared themselves the Caliphate and all muslims are required to pledge service to a legitimate Caliphate should one arrise, but its really long and gay. just know any muslims are pretty much fifth columnists)

So moderate Muslims won't speak out about ISIS. Liberal Muslims won't speak out because of Imperialism. And conservative Muslims think its awesome and we need it everywhere.


TL;DR
Glass the middle east, kill all the jews and muslims.



*Admittedly this is a bad example because its true and the 100% correct action to take regarding faggots.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on May 07, 2016, 05:15:54 PM
The concept of "moderate" Muslims don't really register to Muslims.  Feeling guilty about the actions of your people is a white-only thing, which is why Japs will never apologize for their rape and conquest of China and Korea even though they constantly get pressured to do so.  There are definite degrees of radicalism but that doesn't mean that the less radical Muslims don't understand and agree with the more radical Muslims.  That's why you never see moderate Muslims stand up to the jihadists.

In other words, glass Mecca.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 05:22:26 PM
The end game is that everyone goes back to living like the prophet did. Like it's a whole relgion who's endgame is to turn the clock back to the good ol days.

This also includes bringing back slavery(well in the case of the middle east slavery never left).
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 07, 2016, 05:23:28 PM
Let's take a look at the career of Sir Goldsmith:

-expelled from Eton after drugs were found in his room

-appointed editor of some random cuck ecology magazine by Edward Goldsmith, his uncle

-never had a real job in his life and basically lived off daddy's allowance for at least 30 of the last 40 years (became a politician in 2005)

The perfect symbol of everything that is wrong with the British upper class: entitled, spoiled, incompetent, unqualified and unfuckable.

In a just world, he would be living in some miserable dump of a council house in Tower Hamlets/East Londonistan, struggling to make ends meet, while his 14yo ex-wife gets impregnated by some somali gang dindu.

All of the London mayors have been trainwrecks:

Ken Livingstone - Got kicked out of Labour for being too far to the left.

Boris Johnson - (http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03296/election-best-bori_3296441b.jpg)

Now it's a mudslime.  British politics, like Britain itself, is a total disaster beyond salvaging.

Boris was living proof that London still had a sense of humour.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Pizza Cancellation Specialist on May 07, 2016, 05:34:43 PM
You missed the whole being tolerant to them after we annihilate all the retarded muslims.

So kill ALL muslims? Sounds good. Because that is the ONLY way. Moderate muzzies are very very easily converted into extremists, and the higher the concentration of muslims is, the faster the conversion happens.

Seriously dude go read the fuck up. I remember some years ago on here I was among the people trying to give you career advice to unfuck your life. I own a house and make a comfortable living. I'm wiser than you and more well read. Take it from me, one 'slime is still too many.

Name me one place on Earth where muslims are 40%+ of the population that is still a nice safe prosperous place to live. Spoiler Alert: You can't because there isn't one.


Edit: READ THIS BEFORE YOU SPOUT OFF ABOUT MODERATE MUSLIMS AGAIN

Quote
Peace, Violence, & Abrogation

   Muslims in the West are quick to point to passages such as Qur’an 109:6 (“You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) and 2:256 (“There is no compulsion in religion”) as evidence that Islam is a religion of peace. When confronted with harsher passages such as 9:5 (“Slay the idolaters wherever you find them”) and 9:29 (“Fight those who believe not in Allah”), Westernized Muslims interpret these verses in light of the more peaceful teachings of the Qur’an, typically saying something like: “Well, the Qur’an can’t be commanding us to kill unbelievers, since it says that there’s no compulsion in religion.”
    Hence, Westernized Muslims pick the verses of the Qur’an they find most attractive, and they use these verses to sanitize the rest of the Qur’an. But is this the correct way to interpret the Qur’an? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The Qur’an presents its own method of interpretation—the Doctrine of Abrogation.

Whatever verse we shall abrogate, or cause [thee] to forget, we will bring a better than it, or one like unto it. Dost thou not know that God is almighty?
   Qur’an 2:106
 
When We substitute one revelation for another—and God knows best what He reveals (in stages)—they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them understand not.
   Qur’an 16:101
 
   According to the Qur’an, then, when Muslims are faced with conflicting commands, they aren’t supposed to pick the one they like best. Rather, they are to go to history and see which verse was revealed last. Whichever verse came last is said to abrogate (or cancel) earlier revelations.
    What happens when we apply this methodology to Qur’anic verses on peace and violence?
    When we turn to Islam’s theological sources and historical writings (Qur’an, Hadith, Sira, and Tafsir), we find that there are three stages in the call to Jihad, depending on the status of Muslims in a society.
 
STAGE ONE
 
   When Muslims are completely outnumbered and can’t possibly win a physical confrontation with unbelievers, they are to live in peace with non-Muslims and preach a message of tolerance. We see an example of this stage when Muhammad and his followers were a persecuted minority in Mecca. Since the Muslims were entirely outnumbered, the revelations Muhammad received during this stage (e.g. “You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) called for religious tolerance and proclaimed a future punishment (rather than a worldly punishment) for unbelievers.
 
STAGE TWO
 
   When there are enough Muslims and resources to defend the Islamic community, Muslims are called to engage in defensive Jihad. Thus, when Muhammad had formed alliances with various groups outside Mecca and the Muslim community had become large enough to begin fighting, Muhammad received Qur’an 22:39-40:

 Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them; Those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: our Lord is Allah…

   Although Muslims in the West often pretend that Islam only allows defensive fighting, later revelations show otherwise.
 
STAGE THREE
 
   When Muslims establish a majority and achieve political power in an area, they are commanded to engage in offensive Jihad. Hence, once Mecca and Arabia were under Muhammad’s control, he received the call the fight all unbelievers. In Surah 9:29, we read:
 
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
 
   Notice that this verse doesn’t order Muslims to fight oppressors, but to fight those who don’t believe in Islam (including the “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians).
    Not surprisingly, we find similar commands in Islam’s most trusted collections of ahadith (traditions containing Muhammad’s teachings).
 
Muhammad said: “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illallah, Allah will save his property and his life from me.”
   Sahih al-Bukhari 6924
 
Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”
   Sahih Muslim 30
 
   Here again, the criterion for fighting people is that the people believe something other than Islam.
    It’s clear, then, that when Muslims rose to power, peaceful verses of the Qur’an were abrogated by verses commanding Muslims to fight people based on their beliefs. Islam’s greatest scholars acknowledge this. For instance, Ibn Kathir (Islam’s greatest commentator on the Qur’an) sums up Stage Three as follows: “Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought till they are killed.”
 
When Muslims Reach Stage Three
   Abrogation also accounts for shifting attitudes regarding Jews and Christians in the Qur’an. While Muslims are to be friendly to Jews and Christians when the former are outnumbered, the Islamic position changes when Muslims reach Stage Three, at which point Christians and Jews are to recognize their inferior status and pay the Jizyah (a payment made to Muslims in exchange for not being killed by them). Consider some of Muhammad’s later teachings about Christians and Jews:
 
O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.
   Qur’an 5:51
 
And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!
   Qur’an 9:30
 
Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein. They are the worst of creatures.
   Qur’an 98:6
 
Muhammad said: “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.”
   Sahih Muslim 4366

Muhammad said: “Do not give the People of the Book the greeting first. Force them to the narrowest part of the road.”
   Al-Bukhari, Al-Adab al-Mufrad 1103
 
   Needless to say, these teachings can hardly be considered peaceful or tolerant.
 
Muslims in the West
   Since Muhammad obviously commanded his followers to fight unbelievers (simply for being unbelievers), why do Muslims in the West deny this? Here we must turn to Surah 3:28, which reads:
 
Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security.

   According to this verse (which uses a variation of the word Taqiyya, meaning “concealment”), Muslims are not allowed to be friends with non-Muslims. However, if Muslims feel threatened by a stronger adversary, they are allowed to pretend to be friendly. Ibn Kathir comments: “In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly but never inwardly.” Abu Darda, one of Muhammad’s companions, put it this way: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”
 
Assessment
   Is Islam a religion of peace? No. Islam is a religion that pretends to be peaceful when Muslims are too weak to win a war.When Islam is dominant, Muslims are commanded to subjugate or kill everyone around them. (Just look at how non-Muslims are treated in Muslim countries; compare this constant abuse and persecution with what is being proclaimed about “peaceful” Islam by Westernized Muslims.)
   Of course, there are many Muslims who aren’t violent. Many Muslims in the West love peace and tolerance. But they didn’t get these values from Islam. They got them from the West, and now they’re reinterpreting Islam based on their Western values. For dedicated Muslims, however, there are only two possible situations: (1) fighting unbelievers, and (2) pretending to be peaceful while preparing to fight unbelievers. Either way, conquering the world in the name of Allah is always the goal.

~:~

   As long as the Muslim population remains under 2% in any given country, they will, for the most part, be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

   United States–0.6%
   Australia–1.5%
   Canada–1.9%
   China–1.8%
   Italy–1.5%
   Norway–1.8%

   At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize to other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from prisons and street gangs. This is happening in:

   Denmark–2%
   Germany–3.7%
   United Kingdom–2.7% 
   Spain–4% 
   Thailand–4.6%   

   From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves–along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

   France–8% 
   Philippines–5% 
   Sweden–5% 
   Switzerland–4.3% 
   The Netherlands–5.5% 
   Trinidad & Tobago–5.8% 

   At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Shari'ah, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Shari'ah law over the entire world. When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Is1am and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

   Guyana–10%
   India–13.4%
   Israel–16%
   Kenya–10%
   Russia–15%

   After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, as in:

   Ethiopia–32.8% 

   At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, as in:

   Bosnia–40% 
   Chad–53.1% 
   Lebanon–59.7% 

   From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of nonbelievers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Shari’ah Law as a weapon, and jizya, the tax placed on infidels, as in:

   Albania–70% 
   Malaysia–60.4% 
   Qatar–77.5% 
   Sudan–70%   

   After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some state-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, as has been experienced–and in some ways is ongoing–in:

   Bangladesh–83% 
   Egypt–90% 
   Gaza–98.7% 
   Indonesia–86.1 % 
   Iran–98% 
   Iraq–97% 
   Jordan–92% 
   Morocco–98.7% 
   Pakistan–97% 
   Palestine–99%
   Syria–90% 
   Tajikistan–90%
   Turkey–90%
   United Arab Emirates–96%

   100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’–the Islamic House of Peace. Here, there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the madrasses are the only schools, and the Quran is the only word, as in:

   Afghanistan–100% Muslim
   Saudi Arabia–100% Muslim
   Somalia–100% Muslim
   Yemen–100% Muslim

   Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states, the most radical Muslims intimidate, spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims for a variety of reasons. Quote:

   “Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world; and all of us against the infidel.”

   It is important to understand that even in countries with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Shari’ah Law. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Quran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate. Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other groups.

   “As a Muslim, I don’t support the actions of IS.” “As a Muslim, I don’t support beheading journalists and murdering women and children.” As a Muslim, I don’t support killing religious minorities; they do not do this in my name.”
   Try getting them to say it. Just try. They won’t. They’ll do anything to avoid answering that question. They’ll deflect and strawman and do mental gymnastics, but they’ll never condemn extremism.    Why do you think their default response to being challenged is to dredge up colonialism, the war on terror, Israel, and any other minor injustice they can remember from Islamic history, real or imagined, that fits their victim complex?
   Because they fucking support it.
   Islam and extremism are inseparable. They may not be willing to give up their cushy lives and go pick up a gun–they may not be willing to cut off a guy’s head with their own knife–but if IS rolled into town tomorrow, they wouldn’t take up arms against them, they wouldn’t fight for their Christian and Jewish and Hindu and Sikh and secular neighbors, they wouldn’t stand up and advocate for the people who have payed their welfare and educated their children and healed their sick. They’d stand there and watch them be slaughtered, and they wouldn’t even lose sleep over it. Because that’s what it means to be a Muslim. Not a religion of peace, but a religion of passive indifference to violence committed in your name. You know the difference between a Westerner and a Muslim? Westerners protested the war on terror, they protested intervention, immigration, and they have advocated for and protected their Muslim neighbors. Not all of them, and not every time, but frequently enough to make it obvious that not everyone supports these actions. You know who Muslims have advocated for and protested for?
   Themselves. That’s it.

   There is an easy response to this. Simply ask whether the prophet Muhammad was a Muslim and whether he led an exemplary life. As he spent most of his his as a roving warlord, if his life was a good example, then IS is living the example much more than any westernized kebab. If this doesn’t work, ask whether the person with whom you are conversing agrees that beliefs affect behavior. For example, one if one believes that homosexuality, apostasy, and blasphemy are crimes that should be punished by death, do you think that makes the person holding that view more or less likely to commit violence against a blasphemer or fag?
   Ask what counts as Islam and “Islamic”–if the words spoken by Muhammad and the life he lead don’t count as Islamic, call bullshit. Do the things Jesus said count as Christianity? Of course.
   Give a counter example. If a Quaker or Buddhist or Hare Krishna goes on a killing spree and says he is doing it in the name of Krishna, are there any parts of the Bhagavad Gita that support him? Did the Buddha ever encourage murder? No. So you could very easily say that the attack was un-Buddhist or un-Krishna.
   Give examples of systemic Islamic violence. Saudi Arabia has public stoning as a (rare, but) legal form of execution. Homosexuals, adulteresses, blasphemers, and apostates are regularly executed. Is that un-Islamic? Seriously, is Saudi Arabia un-Islamic? That would be like suggesting that Vatican City isn’t Catholic.
   This all boils down to people thinking that religious beliefs are all the same, which is utter bullshit. Some religious teach peace and have long histories thereof (Buddhism, Jainism, Hare Krishna-ism, Quakerism, etc.); others teach violence and have histories of violence–Islam being the chief proponent.

1. Pew Research (2007):    26% of younger Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are justified.
            35% of young Muslims in Britain believe suicide bombings are justified (24% overall).
            42% of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified (35% overall).
            22% of young Muslims in Germany believe suicide bombings are justified (13% overall).
            29% of young Muslims in Spain believe suicide bombings are justified (25% overall).
2. ICM Poll:          20% of British Muslims sympathize with 7/7 bombers.
3. NOP Research:       25% of British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified.
4. FSIS:          18% of Muslim students in Britain would not report a fellow Muslim planning a terror attack.
5. ICM Poll:          25% of British Muslims disagree that a Muslim has an obligation to report terrorists to police.
6. Pew Research (2007):    Muslim-Americans who identify more strongly with their religion are three times more likely to feel that suicide bombings are justified.
7. CSC:          33% of British Muslim students support killing for Islam.
8. Policy Exchange:       33% of British Muslims believe anyone who leaves Islam should be killed.
9. GfK NOP:          28% of British Muslims want Britain to be an Islamic state.
10. NOP Research:       68% of British Muslims support the arrest and prosecution of anyone who insults Islam.
11. Policy Exchange:    51% of British Muslims believe a woman cannot marry a non-Muslim. Only 51% believe a Muslim woman may marry without a guardian's consent.
12. NOP Research:       62% of British Muslims do not believe in the protection of free speech. Only 3% adopt a "consistently pro freedom of speech line.”
13. Parisian Muslims:   75% of women wear their masks out of fear–including fear of violence.

1 & 6. http://www.pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=60
2  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll reveals 40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html
3. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879. shtml&date=2011-04-06
4. http://www.fosis.org uk/sac/FullReport.pdf and danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist
5. http://www.icmresearch.com/pdfs/2004_november_guardian_muslims_poll.pdf
7. http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/files/1231525079_1.pdf (if site is down - mirror: conservativehome.blogs.com/files/1292336866_1-1.pdf)
8, 9, & 11. http://www.civifas.org/uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf
10 & 12. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879.shtml&date=2011-04-06
13. http://www.nugget.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3402230

FSIS: Federation of Student Islamic Societies
CSC: Center for Social Cohesion

TL;DR:

1. Remove religion protection from Islam.
2. Classify Islam as a cult of violence.
3. Ban the practice of Islam.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 05:38:51 PM
You missed the whole being tolerant to them after we annihilate all the retarded muslims.

So kill ALL muslims? Sounds good. Because that is the ONLY way. Moderate muzzies are very very easily converted into extremists, and the higher the concentration of muslims is, the faster the conversion happens.

Seriously dude go read the fuck up. I remember some years ago on here I was among the people trying to give you career advice to unfuck your life. I own a house and make a comfortable living. I'm wiser than you and more well read. Take it from me, one 'slime is still too many.

Name me one place on Earth where muslims are 40%+ of the population that is still a nice safe prosperous place to live. Spoiler Alert: You can't because there isn't one.


Edit: READ THIS BEFORE YOU SPOUT OFF ABOUT MODERATE MUSLIMS AGAIN

Quote
Peace, Violence, & Abrogation

   Muslims in the West are quick to point to passages such as Qur’an 109:6 (“You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) and 2:256 (“There is no compulsion in religion”) as evidence that Islam is a religion of peace. When confronted with harsher passages such as 9:5 (“Slay the idolaters wherever you find them”) and 9:29 (“Fight those who believe not in Allah”), Westernized Muslims interpret these verses in light of the more peaceful teachings of the Qur’an, typically saying something like: “Well, the Qur’an can’t be commanding us to kill unbelievers, since it says that there’s no compulsion in religion.”
    Hence, Westernized Muslims pick the verses of the Qur’an they find most attractive, and they use these verses to sanitize the rest of the Qur’an. But is this the correct way to interpret the Qur’an? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The Qur’an presents its own method of interpretation—the Doctrine of Abrogation.

Whatever verse we shall abrogate, or cause [thee] to forget, we will bring a better than it, or one like unto it. Dost thou not know that God is almighty?
   Qur’an 2:106
 
When We substitute one revelation for another—and God knows best what He reveals (in stages)—they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them understand not.
   Qur’an 16:101
 
   According to the Qur’an, then, when Muslims are faced with conflicting commands, they aren’t supposed to pick the one they like best. Rather, they are to go to history and see which verse was revealed last. Whichever verse came last is said to abrogate (or cancel) earlier revelations.
    What happens when we apply this methodology to Qur’anic verses on peace and violence?
    When we turn to Islam’s theological sources and historical writings (Qur’an, Hadith, Sira, and Tafsir), we find that there are three stages in the call to Jihad, depending on the status of Muslims in a society.
 
STAGE ONE
 
   When Muslims are completely outnumbered and can’t possibly win a physical confrontation with unbelievers, they are to live in peace with non-Muslims and preach a message of tolerance. We see an example of this stage when Muhammad and his followers were a persecuted minority in Mecca. Since the Muslims were entirely outnumbered, the revelations Muhammad received during this stage (e.g. “You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) called for religious tolerance and proclaimed a future punishment (rather than a worldly punishment) for unbelievers.
 
STAGE TWO
 
   When there are enough Muslims and resources to defend the Islamic community, Muslims are called to engage in defensive Jihad. Thus, when Muhammad had formed alliances with various groups outside Mecca and the Muslim community had become large enough to begin fighting, Muhammad received Qur’an 22:39-40:

 Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them; Those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: our Lord is Allah…

   Although Muslims in the West often pretend that Islam only allows defensive fighting, later revelations show otherwise.
 
STAGE THREE
 
   When Muslims establish a majority and achieve political power in an area, they are commanded to engage in offensive Jihad. Hence, once Mecca and Arabia were under Muhammad’s control, he received the call the fight all unbelievers. In Surah 9:29, we read:
 
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
 
   Notice that this verse doesn’t order Muslims to fight oppressors, but to fight those who don’t believe in Islam (including the “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians).
    Not surprisingly, we find similar commands in Islam’s most trusted collections of ahadith (traditions containing Muhammad’s teachings).
 
Muhammad said: “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illallah, Allah will save his property and his life from me.”
   Sahih al-Bukhari 6924
 
Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”
   Sahih Muslim 30
 
   Here again, the criterion for fighting people is that the people believe something other than Islam.
    It’s clear, then, that when Muslims rose to power, peaceful verses of the Qur’an were abrogated by verses commanding Muslims to fight people based on their beliefs. Islam’s greatest scholars acknowledge this. For instance, Ibn Kathir (Islam’s greatest commentator on the Qur’an) sums up Stage Three as follows: “Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought till they are killed.”
 
When Muslims Reach Stage Three
   Abrogation also accounts for shifting attitudes regarding Jews and Christians in the Qur’an. While Muslims are to be friendly to Jews and Christians when the former are outnumbered, the Islamic position changes when Muslims reach Stage Three, at which point Christians and Jews are to recognize their inferior status and pay the Jizyah (a payment made to Muslims in exchange for not being killed by them). Consider some of Muhammad’s later teachings about Christians and Jews:
 
O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.
   Qur’an 5:51
 
And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!
   Qur’an 9:30
 
Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein. They are the worst of creatures.
   Qur’an 98:6
 
Muhammad said: “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.”
   Sahih Muslim 4366

Muhammad said: “Do not give the People of the Book the greeting first. Force them to the narrowest part of the road.”
   Al-Bukhari, Al-Adab al-Mufrad 1103
 
   Needless to say, these teachings can hardly be considered peaceful or tolerant.
 
Muslims in the West
   Since Muhammad obviously commanded his followers to fight unbelievers (simply for being unbelievers), why do Muslims in the West deny this? Here we must turn to Surah 3:28, which reads:
 
Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security.

   According to this verse (which uses a variation of the word Taqiyya, meaning “concealment”), Muslims are not allowed to be friends with non-Muslims. However, if Muslims feel threatened by a stronger adversary, they are allowed to pretend to be friendly. Ibn Kathir comments: “In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly but never inwardly.” Abu Darda, one of Muhammad’s companions, put it this way: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”
 
Assessment
   Is Islam a religion of peace? No. Islam is a religion that pretends to be peaceful when Muslims are too weak to win a war.When Islam is dominant, Muslims are commanded to subjugate or kill everyone around them. (Just look at how non-Muslims are treated in Muslim countries; compare this constant abuse and persecution with what is being proclaimed about “peaceful” Islam by Westernized Muslims.)
   Of course, there are many Muslims who aren’t violent. Many Muslims in the West love peace and tolerance. But they didn’t get these values from Islam. They got them from the West, and now they’re reinterpreting Islam based on their Western values. For dedicated Muslims, however, there are only two possible situations: (1) fighting unbelievers, and (2) pretending to be peaceful while preparing to fight unbelievers. Either way, conquering the world in the name of Allah is always the goal.

~:~

   As long as the Muslim population remains under 2% in any given country, they will, for the most part, be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

   United States–0.6%
   Australia–1.5%
   Canada–1.9%
   China–1.8%
   Italy–1.5%
   Norway–1.8%

   At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize to other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from prisons and street gangs. This is happening in:

   Denmark–2%
   Germany–3.7%
   United Kingdom–2.7% 
   Spain–4% 
   Thailand–4.6%   

   From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves–along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

   France–8% 
   Philippines–5% 
   Sweden–5% 
   Switzerland–4.3% 
   The Netherlands–5.5% 
   Trinidad & Tobago–5.8% 

   At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Shari'ah, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Shari'ah law over the entire world. When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Is1am and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

   Guyana–10%
   India–13.4%
   Israel–16%
   Kenya–10%
   Russia–15%

   After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, as in:

   Ethiopia–32.8% 

   At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, as in:

   Bosnia–40% 
   Chad–53.1% 
   Lebanon–59.7% 

   From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of nonbelievers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Shari’ah Law as a weapon, and jizya, the tax placed on infidels, as in:

   Albania–70% 
   Malaysia–60.4% 
   Qatar–77.5% 
   Sudan–70%   

   After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some state-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, as has been experienced–and in some ways is ongoing–in:

   Bangladesh–83% 
   Egypt–90% 
   Gaza–98.7% 
   Indonesia–86.1 % 
   Iran–98% 
   Iraq–97% 
   Jordan–92% 
   Morocco–98.7% 
   Pakistan–97% 
   Palestine–99%
   Syria–90% 
   Tajikistan–90%
   Turkey–90%
   United Arab Emirates–96%

   100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’–the Islamic House of Peace. Here, there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the madrasses are the only schools, and the Quran is the only word, as in:

   Afghanistan–100% Muslim
   Saudi Arabia–100% Muslim
   Somalia–100% Muslim
   Yemen–100% Muslim

   Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states, the most radical Muslims intimidate, spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims for a variety of reasons. Quote:

   “Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world; and all of us against the infidel.”

   It is important to understand that even in countries with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Shari’ah Law. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Quran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate. Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other groups.

   “As a Muslim, I don’t support the actions of IS.” “As a Muslim, I don’t support beheading journalists and murdering women and children.” As a Muslim, I don’t support killing religious minorities; they do not do this in my name.”
   Try getting them to say it. Just try. They won’t. They’ll do anything to avoid answering that question. They’ll deflect and strawman and do mental gymnastics, but they’ll never condemn extremism.    Why do you think their default response to being challenged is to dredge up colonialism, the war on terror, Israel, and any other minor injustice they can remember from Islamic history, real or imagined, that fits their victim complex?
   Because they fucking support it.
   Islam and extremism are inseparable. They may not be willing to give up their cushy lives and go pick up a gun–they may not be willing to cut off a guy’s head with their own knife–but if IS rolled into town tomorrow, they wouldn’t take up arms against them, they wouldn’t fight for their Christian and Jewish and Hindu and Sikh and secular neighbors, they wouldn’t stand up and advocate for the people who have payed their welfare and educated their children and healed their sick. They’d stand there and watch them be slaughtered, and they wouldn’t even lose sleep over it. Because that’s what it means to be a Muslim. Not a religion of peace, but a religion of passive indifference to violence committed in your name. You know the difference between a Westerner and a Muslim? Westerners protested the war on terror, they protested intervention, immigration, and they have advocated for and protected their Muslim neighbors. Not all of them, and not every time, but frequently enough to make it obvious that not everyone supports these actions. You know who Muslims have advocated for and protested for?
   Themselves. That’s it.

   There is an easy response to this. Simply ask whether the prophet Muhammad was a Muslim and whether he led an exemplary life. As he spent most of his his as a roving warlord, if his life was a good example, then IS is living the example much more than any westernized kebab. If this doesn’t work, ask whether the person with whom you are conversing agrees that beliefs affect behavior. For example, one if one believes that homosexuality, apostasy, and blasphemy are crimes that should be punished by death, do you think that makes the person holding that view more or less likely to commit violence against a blasphemer or fag?
   Ask what counts as Islam and “Islamic”–if the words spoken by Muhammad and the life he lead don’t count as Islamic, call bullshit. Do the things Jesus said count as Christianity? Of course.
   Give a counter example. If a Quaker or Buddhist or Hare Krishna goes on a killing spree and says he is doing it in the name of Krishna, are there any parts of the Bhagavad Gita that support him? Did the Buddha ever encourage murder? No. So you could very easily say that the attack was un-Buddhist or un-Krishna.
   Give examples of systemic Islamic violence. Saudi Arabia has public stoning as a (rare, but) legal form of execution. Homosexuals, adulteresses, blasphemers, and apostates are regularly executed. Is that un-Islamic? Seriously, is Saudi Arabia un-Islamic? That would be like suggesting that Vatican City isn’t Catholic.
   This all boils down to people thinking that religious beliefs are all the same, which is utter bullshit. Some religious teach peace and have long histories thereof (Buddhism, Jainism, Hare Krishna-ism, Quakerism, etc.); others teach violence and have histories of violence–Islam being the chief proponent.

1. Pew Research (2007):    26% of younger Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are justified.
            35% of young Muslims in Britain believe suicide bombings are justified (24% overall).
            42% of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified (35% overall).
            22% of young Muslims in Germany believe suicide bombings are justified (13% overall).
            29% of young Muslims in Spain believe suicide bombings are justified (25% overall).
2. ICM Poll:          20% of British Muslims sympathize with 7/7 bombers.
3. NOP Research:       25% of British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified.
4. FSIS:          18% of Muslim students in Britain would not report a fellow Muslim planning a terror attack.
5. ICM Poll:          25% of British Muslims disagree that a Muslim has an obligation to report terrorists to police.
6. Pew Research (2007):    Muslim-Americans who identify more strongly with their religion are three times more likely to feel that suicide bombings are justified.
7. CSC:          33% of British Muslim students support killing for Islam.
8. Policy Exchange:       33% of British Muslims believe anyone who leaves Islam should be killed.
9. GfK NOP:          28% of British Muslims want Britain to be an Islamic state.
10. NOP Research:       68% of British Muslims support the arrest and prosecution of anyone who insults Islam.
11. Policy Exchange:    51% of British Muslims believe a woman cannot marry a non-Muslim. Only 51% believe a Muslim woman may marry without a guardian's consent.
12. NOP Research:       62% of British Muslims do not believe in the protection of free speech. Only 3% adopt a "consistently pro freedom of speech line.”
13. Parisian Muslims:   75% of women wear their masks out of fear–including fear of violence.

1 & 6. http://www.pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=60
2  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll reveals 40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html
3. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879. shtml&date=2011-04-06
4. http://www.fosis.org uk/sac/FullReport.pdf and danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist
5. http://www.icmresearch.com/pdfs/2004_november_guardian_muslims_poll.pdf
7. http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/files/1231525079_1.pdf (if site is down - mirror: conservativehome.blogs.com/files/1292336866_1-1.pdf)
8, 9, & 11. http://www.civifas.org/uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf
10 & 12. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879.shtml&date=2011-04-06
13. http://www.nugget.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3402230

FSIS: Federation of Student Islamic Societies
CSC: Center for Social Cohesion

TL;DR:

1. Remove religion protection from Islam.
2. Classify Islam as a cult of violence.
3. Ban the practice of Islam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xECUrlnXCqk
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on May 07, 2016, 05:45:40 PM
The concept of "moderate" Muslims don't really register to Muslims.  Feeling guilty about the actions of your people is a white-only thing, which is why Japs will never apologize for their rape and conquest of China and Korea even though they constantly get pressured to do so.  There are definite degrees of radicalism but that doesn't mean that the less radical Muslims don't understand and agree with the more radical Muslims.  That's why you never see moderate Muslims stand up to the jihadists.

In other words, glass Mecca.

Yeah, let me also define "Moderate" muslim:
By my definition, a Moderate Muslim is one who doesn't believe the whole world needs to convert or be killed immediately.

This covers a fairly wide range from "Muslims should have the option to live under Sharia law instead of your heathen laws" to "All muslims should be under Sharia"

Basically "Do we need to execute non-Muslims who break Islamic relgious laws?" and "do we need to use force to export Islam?"is where I draw the Moderate/Extremist line.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 05:56:13 PM
Vlad was right
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on May 07, 2016, 06:00:12 PM
The issue that comes up is that muslims seem to be pretty tolerant and on board with a country's culture until they hit like 2-3% of the population. Then suddenly some rather interesting opinions start to pop up.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 07, 2016, 06:03:34 PM
The issue that comes up is that muslims seem to be pretty tolerant and on board with a country's culture until they hit like 2-3% of the population. Then suddenly some rather interesting opinions start to pop up.
Same thing happened with Mormons until they jettisoned the nutcases because they were costing them donations.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on May 07, 2016, 06:04:36 PM
 A funny thing happens when shitshits are forced to assimilate....
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: sperg rush on May 07, 2016, 06:50:41 PM
The only assimilation there should be are their fucking corpses into the ground.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on May 07, 2016, 07:32:02 PM
You missed the whole being tolerant to them after we annihilate all the retarded muslims.

So kill ALL muslims? Sounds good. Because that is the ONLY way. Moderate muzzies are very very easily converted into extremists, and the higher the concentration of muslims is, the faster the conversion happens.

Seriously dude go read the fuck up. I remember some years ago on here I was among the people trying to give you career advice to unfuck your life. I own a house and make a comfortable living. I'm wiser than you and more well read. Take it from me, one 'slime is still too many.

Name me one place on Earth where muslims are 40%+ of the population that is still a nice safe prosperous place to live. Spoiler Alert: You can't because there isn't one.


Edit: READ THIS BEFORE YOU SPOUT OFF ABOUT MODERATE MUSLIMS AGAIN

Quote
Peace, Violence, & Abrogation

   Muslims in the West are quick to point to passages such as Qur’an 109:6 (“You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) and 2:256 (“There is no compulsion in religion”) as evidence that Islam is a religion of peace. When confronted with harsher passages such as 9:5 (“Slay the idolaters wherever you find them”) and 9:29 (“Fight those who believe not in Allah”), Westernized Muslims interpret these verses in light of the more peaceful teachings of the Qur’an, typically saying something like: “Well, the Qur’an can’t be commanding us to kill unbelievers, since it says that there’s no compulsion in religion.”
    Hence, Westernized Muslims pick the verses of the Qur’an they find most attractive, and they use these verses to sanitize the rest of the Qur’an. But is this the correct way to interpret the Qur’an? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The Qur’an presents its own method of interpretation—the Doctrine of Abrogation.

Whatever verse we shall abrogate, or cause [thee] to forget, we will bring a better than it, or one like unto it. Dost thou not know that God is almighty?
   Qur’an 2:106
 
When We substitute one revelation for another—and God knows best what He reveals (in stages)—they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them understand not.
   Qur’an 16:101
 
   According to the Qur’an, then, when Muslims are faced with conflicting commands, they aren’t supposed to pick the one they like best. Rather, they are to go to history and see which verse was revealed last. Whichever verse came last is said to abrogate (or cancel) earlier revelations.
    What happens when we apply this methodology to Qur’anic verses on peace and violence?
    When we turn to Islam’s theological sources and historical writings (Qur’an, Hadith, Sira, and Tafsir), we find that there are three stages in the call to Jihad, depending on the status of Muslims in a society.
 
STAGE ONE
 
   When Muslims are completely outnumbered and can’t possibly win a physical confrontation with unbelievers, they are to live in peace with non-Muslims and preach a message of tolerance. We see an example of this stage when Muhammad and his followers were a persecuted minority in Mecca. Since the Muslims were entirely outnumbered, the revelations Muhammad received during this stage (e.g. “You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) called for religious tolerance and proclaimed a future punishment (rather than a worldly punishment) for unbelievers.
 
STAGE TWO
 
   When there are enough Muslims and resources to defend the Islamic community, Muslims are called to engage in defensive Jihad. Thus, when Muhammad had formed alliances with various groups outside Mecca and the Muslim community had become large enough to begin fighting, Muhammad received Qur’an 22:39-40:

 Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them; Those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: our Lord is Allah…

   Although Muslims in the West often pretend that Islam only allows defensive fighting, later revelations show otherwise.
 
STAGE THREE
 
   When Muslims establish a majority and achieve political power in an area, they are commanded to engage in offensive Jihad. Hence, once Mecca and Arabia were under Muhammad’s control, he received the call the fight all unbelievers. In Surah 9:29, we read:
 
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
 
   Notice that this verse doesn’t order Muslims to fight oppressors, but to fight those who don’t believe in Islam (including the “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians).
    Not surprisingly, we find similar commands in Islam’s most trusted collections of ahadith (traditions containing Muhammad’s teachings).
 
Muhammad said: “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illallah, Allah will save his property and his life from me.”
   Sahih al-Bukhari 6924
 
Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”
   Sahih Muslim 30
 
   Here again, the criterion for fighting people is that the people believe something other than Islam.
    It’s clear, then, that when Muslims rose to power, peaceful verses of the Qur’an were abrogated by verses commanding Muslims to fight people based on their beliefs. Islam’s greatest scholars acknowledge this. For instance, Ibn Kathir (Islam’s greatest commentator on the Qur’an) sums up Stage Three as follows: “Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought till they are killed.”
 
When Muslims Reach Stage Three
   Abrogation also accounts for shifting attitudes regarding Jews and Christians in the Qur’an. While Muslims are to be friendly to Jews and Christians when the former are outnumbered, the Islamic position changes when Muslims reach Stage Three, at which point Christians and Jews are to recognize their inferior status and pay the Jizyah (a payment made to Muslims in exchange for not being killed by them). Consider some of Muhammad’s later teachings about Christians and Jews:
 
O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.
   Qur’an 5:51
 
And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!
   Qur’an 9:30
 
Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein. They are the worst of creatures.
   Qur’an 98:6
 
Muhammad said: “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.”
   Sahih Muslim 4366

Muhammad said: “Do not give the People of the Book the greeting first. Force them to the narrowest part of the road.”
   Al-Bukhari, Al-Adab al-Mufrad 1103
 
   Needless to say, these teachings can hardly be considered peaceful or tolerant.
 
Muslims in the West
   Since Muhammad obviously commanded his followers to fight unbelievers (simply for being unbelievers), why do Muslims in the West deny this? Here we must turn to Surah 3:28, which reads:
 
Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security.

   According to this verse (which uses a variation of the word Taqiyya, meaning “concealment”), Muslims are not allowed to be friends with non-Muslims. However, if Muslims feel threatened by a stronger adversary, they are allowed to pretend to be friendly. Ibn Kathir comments: “In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly but never inwardly.” Abu Darda, one of Muhammad’s companions, put it this way: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”
 
Assessment
   Is Islam a religion of peace? No. Islam is a religion that pretends to be peaceful when Muslims are too weak to win a war.When Islam is dominant, Muslims are commanded to subjugate or kill everyone around them. (Just look at how non-Muslims are treated in Muslim countries; compare this constant abuse and persecution with what is being proclaimed about “peaceful” Islam by Westernized Muslims.)
   Of course, there are many Muslims who aren’t violent. Many Muslims in the West love peace and tolerance. But they didn’t get these values from Islam. They got them from the West, and now they’re reinterpreting Islam based on their Western values. For dedicated Muslims, however, there are only two possible situations: (1) fighting unbelievers, and (2) pretending to be peaceful while preparing to fight unbelievers. Either way, conquering the world in the name of Allah is always the goal.

~:~

   As long as the Muslim population remains under 2% in any given country, they will, for the most part, be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

   United States–0.6%
   Australia–1.5%
   Canada–1.9%
   China–1.8%
   Italy–1.5%
   Norway–1.8%

   At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize to other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from prisons and street gangs. This is happening in:

   Denmark–2%
   Germany–3.7%
   United Kingdom–2.7% 
   Spain–4% 
   Thailand–4.6%   

   From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves–along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

   France–8% 
   Philippines–5% 
   Sweden–5% 
   Switzerland–4.3% 
   The Netherlands–5.5% 
   Trinidad & Tobago–5.8% 

   At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Shari'ah, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Shari'ah law over the entire world. When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Is1am and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

   Guyana–10%
   India–13.4%
   Israel–16%
   Kenya–10%
   Russia–15%

   After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, as in:

   Ethiopia–32.8% 

   At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, as in:

   Bosnia–40% 
   Chad–53.1% 
   Lebanon–59.7% 

   From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of nonbelievers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Shari’ah Law as a weapon, and jizya, the tax placed on infidels, as in:

   Albania–70% 
   Malaysia–60.4% 
   Qatar–77.5% 
   Sudan–70%   

   After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some state-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, as has been experienced–and in some ways is ongoing–in:

   Bangladesh–83% 
   Egypt–90% 
   Gaza–98.7% 
   Indonesia–86.1 % 
   Iran–98% 
   Iraq–97% 
   Jordan–92% 
   Morocco–98.7% 
   Pakistan–97% 
   Palestine–99%
   Syria–90% 
   Tajikistan–90%
   Turkey–90%
   United Arab Emirates–96%

   100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’–the Islamic House of Peace. Here, there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the madrasses are the only schools, and the Quran is the only word, as in:

   Afghanistan–100% Muslim
   Saudi Arabia–100% Muslim
   Somalia–100% Muslim
   Yemen–100% Muslim

   Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states, the most radical Muslims intimidate, spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims for a variety of reasons. Quote:

   “Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world; and all of us against the infidel.”

   It is important to understand that even in countries with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Shari’ah Law. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Quran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate. Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other groups.

   “As a Muslim, I don’t support the actions of IS.” “As a Muslim, I don’t support beheading journalists and murdering women and children.” As a Muslim, I don’t support killing religious minorities; they do not do this in my name.”
   Try getting them to say it. Just try. They won’t. They’ll do anything to avoid answering that question. They’ll deflect and strawman and do mental gymnastics, but they’ll never condemn extremism.    Why do you think their default response to being challenged is to dredge up colonialism, the war on terror, Israel, and any other minor injustice they can remember from Islamic history, real or imagined, that fits their victim complex?
   Because they fucking support it.
   Islam and extremism are inseparable. They may not be willing to give up their cushy lives and go pick up a gun–they may not be willing to cut off a guy’s head with their own knife–but if IS rolled into town tomorrow, they wouldn’t take up arms against them, they wouldn’t fight for their Christian and Jewish and Hindu and Sikh and secular neighbors, they wouldn’t stand up and advocate for the people who have payed their welfare and educated their children and healed their sick. They’d stand there and watch them be slaughtered, and they wouldn’t even lose sleep over it. Because that’s what it means to be a Muslim. Not a religion of peace, but a religion of passive indifference to violence committed in your name. You know the difference between a Westerner and a Muslim? Westerners protested the war on terror, they protested intervention, immigration, and they have advocated for and protected their Muslim neighbors. Not all of them, and not every time, but frequently enough to make it obvious that not everyone supports these actions. You know who Muslims have advocated for and protested for?
   Themselves. That’s it.

   There is an easy response to this. Simply ask whether the prophet Muhammad was a Muslim and whether he led an exemplary life. As he spent most of his his as a roving warlord, if his life was a good example, then IS is living the example much more than any westernized kebab. If this doesn’t work, ask whether the person with whom you are conversing agrees that beliefs affect behavior. For example, one if one believes that homosexuality, apostasy, and blasphemy are crimes that should be punished by death, do you think that makes the person holding that view more or less likely to commit violence against a blasphemer or fag?
   Ask what counts as Islam and “Islamic”–if the words spoken by Muhammad and the life he lead don’t count as Islamic, call bullshit. Do the things Jesus said count as Christianity? Of course.
   Give a counter example. If a Quaker or Buddhist or Hare Krishna goes on a killing spree and says he is doing it in the name of Krishna, are there any parts of the Bhagavad Gita that support him? Did the Buddha ever encourage murder? No. So you could very easily say that the attack was un-Buddhist or un-Krishna.
   Give examples of systemic Islamic violence. Saudi Arabia has public stoning as a (rare, but) legal form of execution. Homosexuals, adulteresses, blasphemers, and apostates are regularly executed. Is that un-Islamic? Seriously, is Saudi Arabia un-Islamic? That would be like suggesting that Vatican City isn’t Catholic.
   This all boils down to people thinking that religious beliefs are all the same, which is utter bullshit. Some religious teach peace and have long histories thereof (Buddhism, Jainism, Hare Krishna-ism, Quakerism, etc.); others teach violence and have histories of violence–Islam being the chief proponent.

1. Pew Research (2007):    26% of younger Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are justified.
            35% of young Muslims in Britain believe suicide bombings are justified (24% overall).
            42% of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified (35% overall).
            22% of young Muslims in Germany believe suicide bombings are justified (13% overall).
            29% of young Muslims in Spain believe suicide bombings are justified (25% overall).
2. ICM Poll:          20% of British Muslims sympathize with 7/7 bombers.
3. NOP Research:       25% of British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified.
4. FSIS:          18% of Muslim students in Britain would not report a fellow Muslim planning a terror attack.
5. ICM Poll:          25% of British Muslims disagree that a Muslim has an obligation to report terrorists to police.
6. Pew Research (2007):    Muslim-Americans who identify more strongly with their religion are three times more likely to feel that suicide bombings are justified.
7. CSC:          33% of British Muslim students support killing for Islam.
8. Policy Exchange:       33% of British Muslims believe anyone who leaves Islam should be killed.
9. GfK NOP:          28% of British Muslims want Britain to be an Islamic state.
10. NOP Research:       68% of British Muslims support the arrest and prosecution of anyone who insults Islam.
11. Policy Exchange:    51% of British Muslims believe a woman cannot marry a non-Muslim. Only 51% believe a Muslim woman may marry without a guardian's consent.
12. NOP Research:       62% of British Muslims do not believe in the protection of free speech. Only 3% adopt a "consistently pro freedom of speech line.”
13. Parisian Muslims:   75% of women wear their masks out of fear–including fear of violence.

1 & 6. http://www.pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=60
2  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll reveals 40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html
3. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879. shtml&date=2011-04-06
4. http://www.fosis.org uk/sac/FullReport.pdf and danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist
5. http://www.icmresearch.com/pdfs/2004_november_guardian_muslims_poll.pdf
7. http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/files/1231525079_1.pdf (if site is down - mirror: conservativehome.blogs.com/files/1292336866_1-1.pdf)
8, 9, & 11. http://www.civifas.org/uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf
10 & 12. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879.shtml&date=2011-04-06
13. http://www.nugget.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3402230

FSIS: Federation of Student Islamic Societies
CSC: Center for Social Cohesion

TL;DR:

1. Remove religion protection from Islam.
2. Classify Islam as a cult of violence.
3. Ban the practice of Islam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xECUrlnXCqk
Hurf durf you didn't read that in the 4 minutes between his post and yours.  Go back and read it, bitch.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 40k Scrotal Sacks on May 07, 2016, 07:55:59 PM
The end game is that everyone goes back to living like the prophet did. Like it's a whole relgion who's endgame is to turn the clock back to the good ol days.

This also includes bringing back slavery(well in the case of the middle east slavery never left).

As I said in another thread: The majority of humans today have no problem with living in an early medieval environment. Most never developed beyond that to begin with. No plumbing or even just access to fresh water, no access to modern medicine, no education beyond what your elders teach you - That's the norm for pretty much any place east of Greece. You may have western standards in the biggest couple of cities but the populations are largely rural and never visit there. The Islamic world is especially bad, for obvious reasons. They not only don't mind, they believe living like a bunch of tribal savages is what made them so successful in that brief period of time after Islam was shat out by Arabs in the first place and anything too modern is sinful.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: European Cuckdom on May 08, 2016, 03:30:00 AM
So as Trump is MAGA along, the rest of the west is going to decline into brown chaos. So basically America will be the only nice house left on the block, and we'll have loads and loads of guns to keep it that way.

But hey, Europe. Its not all bad. Societies that have flourished for millenia dying of self inflicted disease, cultures of unspeakable beauty being crushed beneath the feet of violent ingrates, the complete loss of safety outside and speech in your own home, yeah. But at least you aren't racist.

There are a number of parallels you can make with the German vandal armies and the Roman Empire.  Romans used to defeat them and kept them at bay.  Then they started hiring them to fight wars for the Romans.  Then they had "no choice" but to make these foreign mercenaries Roman citizens.  Unsurprisingly all it did was just increase the flow of hostile warriors into the empire where a few decades later, they sacked Rome in 410.

Europeans have had a history of willingly letting in hostile forces in the name of tolerance.


This needs to be quoted.

Probably the funniest comparison to nowadays problems: crying refugees seeking shelter in the empire, as they were fleeing from the Huns themselves, ending up marauding through the empire for the following centuries and razing to the ground entire cities.

"Dominus! The refugees are raping their way to Athens!"
"Leave them alone, they're all doctors and engineers!"
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on May 08, 2016, 10:26:14 AM
So as Trump is MAGA along, the rest of the west is going to decline into brown chaos. So basically America will be the only nice house left on the block, and we'll have loads and loads of guns to keep it that way.

But hey, Europe. Its not all bad. Societies that have flourished for millenia dying of self inflicted disease, cultures of unspeakable beauty being crushed beneath the feet of violent ingrates, the complete loss of safety outside and speech in your own home, yeah. But at least you aren't racist.

There are a number of parallels you can make with the German vandal armies and the Roman Empire.  Romans used to defeat them and kept them at bay.  Then they started hiring them to fight wars for the Romans.  Then they had "no choice" but to make these foreign mercenaries Roman citizens.  Unsurprisingly all it did was just increase the flow of hostile warriors into the empire where a few decades later, they sacked Rome in 410.

Europeans have had a history of willingly letting in hostile forces in the name of tolerance.

The Romans were a swarthy people too.  It has less to do with ethnic makeup than government control.  Wars make generals and political figures very rich so they want more.  However, during times of peace, it's difficult to get normal people on board for new offensive wars since they're the ones who lose family members.  Also you don't tend to get many natural mercenaries in a peaceful populace.  The natural "win-win" is to get foreign fighters to fight for you, so you can get your warbux and the people don't give a shit since they're not immediately impacted.  The problem is, they have no loyalty to the nation and will turn on you when they don't get paid, which they eventually won't since the nation bankrupts itself fighting these wars. 

It's an age old recipe, but like most peaking civilizations, we think it simply can't happen to us because we're special.  We're also at a point where only the most reckless get into power because of the need to appeal to a wide base, so don't count on change to come from the top. 
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on May 08, 2016, 10:47:24 AM
The fall of Western Rome is fascinating stuff. For a period in Gaul and Hispania and Italy you had separate but equal systems of law and government, where the Germans who ran things sort of left the rich remaining Latin speakers alone. They hired them to help run their government, and there were separate courts for Germans and Romans. And all sorts of controversy when Flavius' daughter married a butter eating pantswearer because "FUCK YOUR, PATER!" Eventually Roman culture was just sort of subsumed out by Germanic culture in those areas. The rich Romans that could, fled to the East.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 08, 2016, 12:27:38 PM
New Muslim Mayor demands that white people must leave transport there's too many of them and they do not represent London.  :geithner:

Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Obese and Triggered on May 08, 2016, 04:07:18 PM
New Muslim Mayor demands that white people must leave transport there's too many of them and they do not represent London.  :geithner:

Source?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 08, 2016, 05:08:22 PM
New Muslim Mayor demands that white people must leave transport there's too many of them and they do not represent London.  :geithner:

Source?

http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2016/03/30/sadiq-khan-there-are-too-many-white-men-on-transport-for-lon
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on May 08, 2016, 05:34:12 PM
http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2016/03/30/sadiq-khan-there-are-too-many-white-men-on-transport-for-lon

Fucking hell, the chutzpah of these moon worshippers is unbelievable:

Quote
"Women face specific challenges on our transport network that are not currently being addressed. I was appalled about the recent decision by British transport police to scrap the sexual violence unit.  Reports of sexual  offences on the London Underground almost tripled over the past five years."

GEE I WONDER WHY MR DURKADURKHAN, MUST BE ALL THOSE WHITE MEN I GUESS
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on May 08, 2016, 06:17:45 PM
Khan has repeatedly rejected TfL's business case assumptions. However, he came under pressure today after it was revealed his own claims about ((Zac Goldsmith's)) fares policy is based on the same business plan.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on May 08, 2016, 06:18:05 PM
To be fair, he was saying that and then Londoners went ahead and elected him a month later.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: horrible racist on May 09, 2016, 01:19:58 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/FVB4hnQ.jpg)
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 09, 2016, 04:58:50 AM
To be fair, he was saying that and then Londoners went ahead and elected him a month later.

That's because they let enough mudslimes in to outvote whitey. Fucks sake
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on May 09, 2016, 05:23:50 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpVi8TJ2RGw

Watch Stefan get depressing as fuck from 8:15 forward.  :myecred:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 09, 2016, 06:16:49 AM
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/08/london-buses-declare-glory-allah/

Allahu Ackbar!
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 09, 2016, 09:29:28 AM
Muslims will not be able to take over europe a whole big lot of them are functionally retarded to the point of needing special care.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2w4zAken08

Islam proves again that the #1 group it harms are other muslims.

Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 09, 2016, 09:32:14 AM
That's blocked in the UK  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 09, 2016, 10:11:50 AM
(https://i.sli.mg/125KSj.jpg)

What the fucking fuck???

 :razor:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: As a white male I on May 09, 2016, 10:32:50 AM
(https://i.sli.mg/125KSj.jpg)

What the fucking fuck???


Yeah we can pronounce UK dead now. Cucked to death.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=176mdAvyOIA
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on May 09, 2016, 11:40:48 AM
Well, should they?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: EaglesDick on May 09, 2016, 11:44:03 AM
Do they have enough sense?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: horrible racist on May 09, 2016, 03:04:18 PM
(https://i.sli.mg/125KSj.jpg)

What the fucking fuck???

 :razor:

FUCKING SEXIST BIGO-   :ultlibrage:

"""""Muslim"""""  :librage:

Oh, my mistake then; proceed with your justifiable and timely inquiry, good sir :unparsons:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 09, 2016, 10:19:35 PM
Do they have enough sense?
Well they never wear white after labor day.  :jesse:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 10, 2016, 03:52:42 AM
New mayor is already saying Transport For London has too many white men on the board.

Gonna be a Muslim Baltimore
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on May 10, 2016, 04:38:41 AM
How do average Londoners deal with this?  Any sose local reporter types?  I can say for sure it wouldn't fly here at all and I'm a coastal blue state max fagland.  It would be nutty chaos.  People would get hurt and maybe die.

Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on May 10, 2016, 06:02:19 AM
How do average Londoners deal with this?  Any sose local reporter types?  I can say for sure it wouldn't fly here at all and I'm a coastal blue state max fagland.  It would be nutty chaos.  People would get hurt and maybe die.

I don't think anyone cares who's on the TfL Board.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: horrible racist on May 10, 2016, 05:22:45 PM
How do average Londoners deal with this?  Any sose local reporter types?  I can say for sure it wouldn't fly here at all and I'm a coastal blue state max fagland.  It would be nutty chaos.  People would get hurt and maybe die.

Probably the same way white people dealt with Detroit. Read: run far, far away.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on May 10, 2016, 07:11:49 PM
How do average Londoners deal with this?  Any sose local reporter types?  I can say for sure it wouldn't fly here at all and I'm a coastal blue state max fagland.  It would be nutty chaos.  People would get hurt and maybe die.
I'm guessing they deal with it by saying "Allah Akbar" and "die white slag".
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: European Cuckdom on May 11, 2016, 09:13:30 AM
London and England are two different things
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 11, 2016, 09:15:12 AM
London and England are two different things
So it's like Austin and Texas.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 11, 2016, 10:48:15 AM
UK in ~~CURRENT YEAR~~.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcxFy30EPWM

What the fuck is going on in this video?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on May 11, 2016, 10:56:48 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAYUuspQ6BY
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on May 11, 2016, 11:01:01 AM
East London, innit.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 11, 2016, 12:51:10 PM
UK in ~~CURRENT YEAR~~.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcxFy30EPWM

What the fuck is going on in this video?

London Chavs speak a different language i swear
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 11, 2016, 12:53:17 PM
 :ultlibrage: THEY'RE CULTURALLY APPROPRIATING THE WORD "FAM" SOMEONE STOP THIS!  :ultlibrage:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on May 12, 2016, 04:55:10 AM
London is burning and I, I live by the river.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 12, 2016, 06:25:03 AM
London is burning and I, I live by the river.

Fuck yeah!

But you know "diversity" is more important than good music or cultural identity.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Chillbro Swaggins on May 12, 2016, 04:25:40 PM
The concept of "moderate" Muslims don't really register to Muslims.  Feeling guilty about the actions of your people is a white-only thing, which is why Japs will never apologize for their rape and conquest of China and Korea even though they constantly get pressured to do so.  There are definite degrees of radicalism but that doesn't mean that the less radical Muslims don't understand and agree with the more radical Muslims.  That's why you never see moderate Muslims stand up to the jihadists.

In other words, glass Mecca.

Yeah, let me also define "Moderate" muslim:
By my definition, a Moderate Muslim is one who doesn't believe the whole world needs to convert or be killed immediately.

This covers a fairly wide range from "Muslims should have the option to live under Sharia law instead of your heathen laws" to "All muslims should be under Sharia"

Basically "Do we need to execute non-Muslims who break Islamic relgious laws?" and "do we need to use force to export Islam?"is where I draw the Moderate/Extremist line.
The vast majority of "Moderate" muslims turn a blind eye to the extremists and make excuses for their behavior.  The ones who actual condemn extremism are a very rare breed, and are forced to stay silent to avoid being killed themselves unless they live in one of the few remaining western nations where extremists aren't allowed free reign.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on May 12, 2016, 10:21:00 PM
In our cucked world where the goyim are expected to shame and disown anyone who has opinions outside of the overton window, it's a different concept with with other ethnicities outside of the western world.  The idea that some camel fucker should denounce his more radical brethren just to show off to others that he's "one of the good ones" is not going to play out well, even if that camel fucker is a "moderate."

That's why I'm of the opinion that it's pointless to demarcate the "moderate Muslims" from the "radical Muslims" and just limit the west's exposure to Islam as much as possible; if they want to live here, they absolutely have to assimilate or else they're out.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 13, 2016, 08:44:54 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/12/the-gap-between-official-migrant-figures-and-the-truth-is-as-wid/

 :stonk:

2.4 million immigrants from Europe alone - nevermind from elsewhere - in just four years. What the fuck are you guys doing over there? This is a small country's worth of people.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on May 13, 2016, 09:20:20 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/12/the-gap-between-official-migrant-figures-and-the-truth-is-as-wid/

 :stonk:

2.4 million immigrants from Europe alone - nevermind from elsewhere - in just four years. What the fuck are you guys doing over there? This is a small country's worth of people.

EU has free movement of labour. It's people from poorer countries such as the one you're in. I'm sure you'd like to live in London as well. Because it's better than wherever you're right now.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 13, 2016, 11:21:28 AM
EU has free movement of labour. It's people from poorer countries such as the one you're in. I'm sure you'd like to live in London as well. Because it's better than wherever you're right now.

I don't see anyone burning the flags of my country while holding signs "SHARIA WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD", so no, it's not really better is it.

Plus, in Londonistan, the average salary will only allow you to live in an absolute dump.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on May 13, 2016, 12:10:41 PM
I think your view of the world may just be a little warped by reading so much news designed to cause outrage.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on May 13, 2016, 12:25:20 PM
And I'm kinda wondering why someone who claims to live in backwater Europe is so obsessed with American politics.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 13, 2016, 12:31:56 PM
And I'm kinda wondering why someone who claims to live in backwater Europe is so obsessed with American politics.

I think it was weird if it were the other way around.

EDIT: Do you have some kind of problem with people being interested in world affairs? Anything that comes out of countries like US or UK affects my life in some way or the other, sooner or later.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Torpid Sloth on May 13, 2016, 12:35:48 PM
And I'm kinda wondering why someone who claims to live in backwater Europe is so obsessed with American politics.

Why not? It's the biggest show on earth. Same reason people watch US films/TV, sports etc.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on May 13, 2016, 12:59:26 PM
EDIT: Do you have some kind of problem with people being interested in world affairs? Anything that comes out of countries like US or UK affects my life in some way or the other, sooner or later.

I do think its perverse in the same sense as our tendency to ignore local politicians in favor of national ones. 
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 13, 2016, 02:05:00 PM
Outsiders should learn about what is happening in the UK, because its a fucking disgrace and something that should be avoided at all costs.

If you live here and are ok with what's happening, please go fuck yourself.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: horrible racist on May 13, 2016, 02:37:18 PM
Sadly, it usually takes a strong dose of reality-based feedback before people start to learn better. For example, we didn't know the effects of space on advanced lifeforms until we started launching rhesus monkeys into the upper atmosphere.

Thanks for taking one for the team, Britain. You're like our modern rhesus monkeys  :reagan:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Chillbro Swaggins on May 13, 2016, 02:45:33 PM
So this time we are launching monkeys into the anglosphere
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: horrible racist on May 13, 2016, 02:57:19 PM
Actually, it's a lot like introducing Kudzu to North America
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: horrible racist on May 13, 2016, 03:05:53 PM
No wait, better analogy yet: http://www.treehugger.com/natural-sciences/invasive-monkeys-spreading-herpes-virus-florida.html  :stonk:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 14, 2016, 07:44:27 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3589749/Pensioner-s-anger-squatter-wins-right-400-000-house-faces-losing-flat-pay-legal-bills.html

ENGLAND YES!
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Whig Historian on May 14, 2016, 01:20:22 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3589749/Pensioner-s-anger-squatter-wins-right-400-000-house-faces-losing-flat-pay-legal-bills.html

ENGLAND YES!
I mean, it sucks for that guy, but that's kinda how adverse possession works.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 17, 2016, 03:26:52 AM
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/britain-has-an-ethnic-problem-the-english/article15792740/

Quote
Let’s face it: Britain has an ethnic problem. Its patchwork of peoples, once the envy of the world, has become frayed, its harmony devolving into anger and xenophobia. And, we should be honest, the problem is rooted in one ethnic group – one large but troubled people who are failing to integrate into modern postindustrial society.
 
While some of its more ambitious members have found success in politics and business, this community is falling behind educationally and economically as a whole, self-segregating into ethnic enclaves, becoming increasingly prone to violence, rioting and substance abuse. More troubling, in recent years they have begun to vote for ethnic extremist parties that threaten to undermine basic British values.

Who are these people? The English. Once a tolerant, welcoming people who thrived in scholarship and commerce, they have become a drag on British society.

Ruler of the Seven Cuckdoms and the Protector of the Realm has spoken.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: J Dog on May 17, 2016, 06:30:37 AM
Quote
Who are these people? The English. Once a tolerant, welcoming people who thrived in scholarship and commerce, they have become a drag on British society.

Since when have the English been well known for their tolerance?  Liberals are constantly trying to insert their 21st century values as core to every society they infest. 
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Trumpriarch on May 17, 2016, 07:14:44 AM
Of all the major colonial powers, one of them tended to leave behind more white nations than others.  It must have something to do with English tolerance, I'm sure.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Thankpfeifengesicht on May 17, 2016, 11:08:07 AM
Quote
Who are these people? The English. Once a tolerant, welcoming people

I'm surprised that Great Britain didn't sink into the sea from all the dead Irishmen, Scotsmen, and Welshmen rolling over in their graves from that line alone.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Handyman on May 17, 2016, 11:47:29 AM
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/britain-has-an-ethnic-problem-the-english/article15792740/

Quote
Let’s face it: Britain has an ethnic problem. Its patchwork of peoples, once the envy of the world, has become frayed, its harmony devolving into anger and xenophobia. And, we should be honest, the problem is rooted in one ethnic group – one large but troubled people who are failing to integrate into modern postindustrial society.
 
While some of its more ambitious members have found success in politics and business, this community is falling behind educationally and economically as a whole, self-segregating into ethnic enclaves, becoming increasingly prone to violence, rioting and substance abuse. More troubling, in recent years they have begun to vote for ethnic extremist parties that threaten to undermine basic British values.

Who are these people? The English. Once a tolerant, welcoming people who thrived in scholarship and commerce, they have become a drag on British society.

Ruler of the Seven Cuckdoms and the Protector of the Realm has spoken.

You're just going to have to get used to being a minority in your own country.   :smug:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: blasting_asshole on May 18, 2016, 01:00:27 PM
UK in ~~CURRENT YEAR~~.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcxFy30EPWM

What the fuck is going on in this video?

London Chavs speak a different language i swear

I could translate that whole video. 10x easier than dindu speak. At least they replace words with other words as opposed to describing shit with noises and sound effects.

"Snitch da biggest roadman you know." = Tell us about the lamest, fake-ass gangster you regularly associate with.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 19, 2016, 09:28:03 AM
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160518/1039824070/masculinity-poll-men-society.html

Quote
According to the YouGov poll, only two percent of young Britons aged between 18 and 24 considered themselves to be completely masculine, with 42 percent of respondents saying the word "masculinity" gave them a negative impression.

Masculinity is cancer.

 :christina:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 19, 2016, 12:25:48 PM
I thought roadmen were truckers and these guys were going around reporting them for traffic violations.

Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 19, 2016, 05:45:59 PM
Aww, look at all these quite British school children  :allears:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrcuWqw2tT8
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 20, 2016, 11:07:28 AM
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/672068/European-Union-Brexit-EU-referendum-UK-open-letter-Benedict-Cumberbatch-Patrick-Stewart

Quote
The Sherlock and AI stars are among 282 celebrities from the worlds of film, music and literature who have written an open letter warning voters against Brexit.

They claimed quitting the EU would be a “leap into the unknown” and leave the country "an outsider shouting from the wings" ahead of the June 23 referendum on whether to remain in the 28-member bloc.

Director Danny Boyle, fashion designer Dame Vivienne Westwood and Bill Nighy, of Love Actually fame, also signed the letter.

 :tuss:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on May 20, 2016, 12:51:38 PM
Has a celebrity endorsement ever worked?  Serious question.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Handyman on May 20, 2016, 01:01:45 PM
They claimed quitting the EU would be a “leap into the unknown”

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 22, 2016, 06:12:35 AM
Follow-up: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/21/luvvies-signed-pro-eu-letter-received-millions-eu-funding/

Quote
Film stars who signed a letter urging Britons to vote to stay within the European Union (EU) benefited from millions of pounds of EU funding, it has emerged.
Some even appeared in a glossy brochure promoting highly lucrative grants available from the EU’s MEDIA scheme, which has handed millions of euros of taxpayer money to projects featuring highly paid international stars.

Research by the Telegraph has found that British film and television projects were handed €28million of taxpayer money over the last seven years. Millions more was spent on helping to export films to the rest of the world.

Keira Knightley, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Helena Bonham Carter, all of whom signed the letter, have also appeared in glossy literature promoting EU grants. The brochures also feature stills from films by Mike Leigh and Danny Boyle, who were also signatories.

We are giving taxpayer money to film stars, who are already rich as fuck, to lecture us on how we need to take in poor, uneducated immigrants from third world countries.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on May 22, 2016, 10:44:50 AM
Aww, look at all these quite British school children  :allears:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrcuWqw2tT8
I was waiting for them all to explode like a string of black cat firecrackers.  Mildly disappointed it didn't happen.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 24, 2016, 04:44:10 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3606210/Teenage-boy-blinded-one-eye-four-suffered-burns-strangers-threw-acid-waited-train.html

What is it with brown people and throwing acid in people's faces?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on May 24, 2016, 06:38:15 PM


Plus, in Londonistan, the average salary will only allow you to live in an absolute dump.
Yep, I was offered a fairly high salary to work in London and turned it down cause I'm much better off living in one of those 'poor' EU countries. 2500 eur in Estonia with free housing goes much much further than 3500gbp in London for example.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 24, 2016, 06:47:47 PM


Plus, in Londonistan, the average salary will only allow you to live in an absolute dump.
Yep, I was offered a fairly high salary to work in London and turned it down cause I'm much better off living in one of those 'poor' EU countries. 2500 eur in Estonia with free housing goes much much further than 3500gbp in London for example.

2500 EUR in the capital is sick skrilla, you'll be living like a king.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on May 24, 2016, 07:06:36 PM


Plus, in Londonistan, the average salary will only allow you to live in an absolute dump.
Yep, I was offered a fairly high salary to work in London and turned it down cause I'm much better off living in one of those 'poor' EU countries. 2500 eur in Estonia with free housing goes much much further than 3500gbp in London for example.

2500 EUR in the capital is sick skrilla, you'll be living like a king.
Exactly. All the twats back in the UK whining about the EU and how tough it is in the UK need to quit their whining and move to a high paying job in one of the newer EU countries. I was earning more in a month than most people would get in a year in Romania for what in the UK would be a bog standard job. Estonia...I turned down.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: wimpb on May 24, 2016, 08:23:54 PM
so if the EU is making your country a shithole, best to leave your country? you're right, the EU is great!
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on May 24, 2016, 08:40:45 PM
so if the EU is making your country a shithole, best to leave your country? you're right, the EU is great!
EU isn't making my country a shithole; our successive governments have done a good job of that. The EU increases the opportunity for me to earn a fuck load more and live a better quality of life.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: skink shamed on May 24, 2016, 08:45:49 PM
rofl the EU is a jewish escape pod
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on May 24, 2016, 09:00:39 PM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on May 24, 2016, 09:25:02 PM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.
Sure because somehow it's the EU's fault that the Greek Government at the time overspent on populist initiatives and cooked the books to make their deficit look better than it was (with the help of Goldman of course). :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: sperg rush on May 24, 2016, 09:31:38 PM
Why the fuck Germany and Sweden need migrants if they can take the unemployed assholes from the southern countries of the EU to fill in?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on May 24, 2016, 09:39:25 PM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.
Sure because somehow it's the EU's fault that the Greek Government at the time overspent on populist initiatives and cooked the books to make their deficit look better than it was (with the help of Goldman of course). :rolleyes:

Let's just make this easier to see if i'm wasting my time or not; in your opinion, what has the EU not done right?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on May 24, 2016, 09:50:51 PM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.
Sure because somehow it's the EU's fault that the Greek Government at the time overspent on populist initiatives and cooked the books to make their deficit look better than it was (with the help of Goldman of course). :rolleyes:

And how many Goldman alums are there in positions of power in the EU government? It's almost as if this whole thing were rigged for some reason  :umberto:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on May 25, 2016, 04:36:29 PM
Why the fuck Germany and Sweden need migrants if they can take the unemployed assholes from the southern countries of the EU to fill in?

I love cock more thanBecausedoes
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on May 25, 2016, 05:34:27 PM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.
Sure because somehow it's the EU's fault that the Greek Government at the time overspent on populist initiatives and cooked the books to make their deficit look better than it was (with the help of Goldman of course). :rolleyes:

And how many Goldman alums are there in positions of power in the EU government? It's almost as if this whole thing were rigged for some reason  :umberto:
That's the same for any Western Govt. Look at the number of Goldman wankers in the White House for example.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 25, 2016, 07:02:21 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3608136/The-racist-programme-honest-reflection-state-nation-Britain-divided-reaction-Whites-East-End.html

Just out of curiosity, what is "racist" or "white supremacist" about documenting the decline of a native population in a particular part of London?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 25, 2016, 07:06:40 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3608136/The-racist-programme-honest-reflection-state-nation-Britain-divided-reaction-Whites-East-End.html

Just out of curiosity, what is "racist" or "white supremacist" about documenting the decline of a native population in a particular part of London?
WHAT ARE YOU BLIND? YOU GIVE WHITE PEOPLE THE MAJORITY AND IT WILL BE NOTHING BUT RACISM AND LYNCHINGS AGAINST ALL BROWNS, THEY'RE FUCKING RACIST SAVAGES!  :librage:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autistic Yankee on May 26, 2016, 01:43:56 AM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.

This is one of those "If only Greece could just print as much money as it wanted, everything would be fine!" arguments right?  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on May 26, 2016, 08:30:27 AM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.

This is one of those "If only Greece could just print as much money as it wanted, everything would be fine!" arguments right?  :rolleyes:

What i'm trying to say is that if there's a member state that's dragging the EU down (by having it's members constantly have to bail it out every year or so), you should just shake it off, but they won't (for political and ideological reasons, Greece is the birthplace of democracy after all).

So, if you don't want Greece to get out of the EU (or any of the PIGS countries for that matter), then you should put in place some sort of long term mechanism to prevent the matter of constant debt relief to a nation that has been rendered 3rd world by this entire thing (not that it was much better before but still).

It's just been handled extremely poorly by the EU, you have a bunch of countries that cannot compete inside the Eurozone, whereas before you could devaluate and (with some smart policy) become stable again, you obviously can't do that with a single currency, so they've basically been left to rot with really no way forward.

They don't wanna cut them off because it's never been done before, but it'd honestly be the best thing for both parties to do.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on May 26, 2016, 01:25:29 PM
Here's how you fix the EU. You take the leaders, you line them up against a wall...
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: High Impact Sexbot 2020 on May 26, 2016, 05:35:17 PM
Make sure to use a diverse range of caliber
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on May 26, 2016, 07:44:07 PM
Let's be fair now; if it wasn't for the EU, Greece might never have experienced a Great Depression-like scenario like they are now.

I just wish those whiners with their "25% unemployment" and "50% youth unemployment" could see the positive side of things.

This is one of those "If only Greece could just print as much money as it wanted, everything would be fine!" arguments right?  :rolleyes:

What i'm trying to say is that if there's a member state that's dragging the EU down (by having it's members constantly have to bail it out every year or so), you should just shake it off, but they won't (for political and ideological reasons, Greece is the birthplace of democracy after all).

Hubris aside I'm sure they wish they could.  The German and French central banks a couple hundred billions of dollars on insurance swaps (the same thing Lehman had on most mortgage backed securities in 2009) on Greece.  If Greece exits the EU they're worthless and they spiral into a worse depression than what already exists.

The EU is giving them money to keep a financial bloodbath at a short trickle, fooling themselves and going through the motions pretending that the Greeks will ever have a solvent economy.  Their only move is to double down and blame the Greeks as much as possible, while the Greeks keep electing leaders from new parties who do jack shit because its not like they can do anything anyway (since Greece is full of Greeks) and just help themselves to EU cash.  It's a typical display of European yammering and deception with nothing ever getting done except things getting steadily worse until war finally brews after the people get too impoverished.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on May 26, 2016, 08:29:18 PM
The EU is giving them money to keep a financial bloodbath at a short trickle, fooling themselves and going through the motions pretending that the Greeks will ever have a solvent economy.  Their only move is to double down and blame the Greeks as much as possible, while the Greeks keep electing leaders from new parties who do jack shit because its not like they can do anything anyway (since Greece is full of Greeks) and just help themselves to EU cash.  It's a typical display of European yammering and deception with nothing ever getting done except things getting steadily worse until war finally brews after the people get too impoverished.

I suspected as much, they better start to lube up though, when it happens it's gonna hurt.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 27, 2016, 02:13:57 PM
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/674489/Home-Secretary-Theresa-May-says-Britain-benefits-Sharia-Law

 :lilal:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dental Grade Dildo on May 27, 2016, 04:25:09 PM
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/674489/Home-Secretary-Theresa-May-says-Britain-benefits-Sharia-Law

 :lilal:


I read that today in Britain they're beginning purdah for the brexit referendum and I thought "what the fuck, did those damn Brits adopt another fucking Muslim custom?"
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: unprivsplain on May 30, 2016, 04:13:32 PM
Here's some lampooning of the pathetic "If UK leaves the EU, something bad will happen according to Brussels report" headlines.
(http://i.imgur.com/d9BqZWc.jpg)
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on May 31, 2016, 06:04:23 AM
(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/05/29/20160530_vote1.jpg)

 :adam:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on May 31, 2016, 07:21:47 AM
The Brexit won't happen.  The vote will come down to 45-48 percent wanting it, 52-55 percent won't.  It's like most nationalist referendums in Europe over the past few years (see: Hofer for President, Scotland leaving the UK, etc.)
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Handyman on May 31, 2016, 03:09:47 PM
Dammit I hope you're wrong. 
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on May 31, 2016, 03:35:05 PM
It won't happen but I wouldn't get too discouraged.  Nationalist/far right sentiments are growing and eventually it will spill over into a majority.  Hofer's margin of loss was not possible 5-10 years ago.  Once a nationalist or far right person gets elected in a high position, the floodgates will burst open and these measures will pass left and right.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: OMNIPRESENT CYBERFILTH on May 31, 2016, 06:59:29 PM
The Brexit won't happen.  The vote will come down to 52-55 percent wanting it, 45-48 percent won't.  It's like most nationalist referendums in Europe over the past few years in that the bureaucrats decide how many "corrections" they want to make (see: Hofer for President, Scotland leaving the UK, etc.)

fixed
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Handyman on May 31, 2016, 07:33:59 PM
It won't happen but I wouldn't get too discouraged.  Nationalist/far right sentiments are growing and eventually it will spill over into a majority.  Hofer's margin of loss was not possible 5-10 years ago.  Once a nationalist or far right person gets elected in a high position, the floodgates will burst open and these measures will pass left and right.

Depends on whether people get redpilled at a rate faster than migrants can come into the country and reproduce.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: a torrent of piss on May 31, 2016, 07:46:28 PM
It won't happen but I wouldn't get too discouraged.  Nationalist/far right sentiments are growing and eventually it will spill over into a majority.  Hofer's margin of loss was not possible 5-10 years ago.  Once a nationalist or far right person gets elected in a high position, the floodgates will burst open and these measures will pass left and right.

Depends on whether people get redpilled at a rate faster than migrants can come into the country and reproduce.
Majority of the migrant children are being born with inbred genetic disorders that require lifelong care. The Pakistanis alone take up 33% of the NHC despite being 3% of the population.

Heathcare crash will be their reckoning.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on June 01, 2016, 06:15:42 AM
Majority of the migrant children are being born with inbred genetic disorders that require lifelong care. The Pakistanis alone take up 33% of the NHC despite being 3% of the population.

Heathcare crash will be their reckoning.

No, I think the exact statistics you are talking about are birth complications/defects. Since the inbreeding rates in Pakistani communities are up to 70% it's become a massive problem. Pakis are only 3% of births in the UK but 33% of complications.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Autism Therapy Chicken on June 03, 2016, 08:48:04 PM
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/outbreak-super-gonorrhoea-proving-difficult-8103451#rlabs=1%20rt$category%20p$4 (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/outbreak-super-gonorrhoea-proving-difficult-8103451#rlabs=1%20rt$category%20p$4)
Quote
Why outbreak of super gonorrhoea is proving difficult to contain

Gonorrhoea was relatively benign in years gone by, going by the name “the clap” and was easily treated with penicillin.

Now it’s a monster. A super-resistant form is cutting a swath through straight and gay communities.

When it emerged in Leeds last year, the new superbug prompted a national alert when one of the main treatments became useless against it.


Cases of super gonorrhoea have now been detected in the West Midlands, London and southern England.

Even Public Health England ­acknowledges it’s proving difficult to contain the outbreak.

Quote
Left untreated, gonorrhoea can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease. Inflammation of the ­fallopian tubes can cause a blockage which can result in infertility. Gonorrhoea can also be passed on to an unborn baby during pregnancy.

Doctors are afraid the STI could soon become untreatable. While the outbreak started in straight couples, it soon moved on to gay men.

“We’ve been worried it would spread to men who have sex with men,” said Peter Greenhouse, a Bristol-based consultant in sexual health.

“The problem is [they] tend to spread infections a lot faster simply because this group changes partners more quickly.”

:ultlibrage::ultlibrage::ultlibrage:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on June 03, 2016, 09:08:11 PM
I'm guessing this is actually only a problem in the gay community and they threw in straights just so they wouldn't look bigoted.  It would make sense that a gay man's ass would be the "poz zero" of super STDs.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on June 03, 2016, 09:56:28 PM
I'm guessing this is actually only a problem in the gay community and they threw in straights just so they wouldn't look bigoted.  It would make sense that a gay man's ass would be the "poz zero" of super STDs.

I'd wager that this WILL become a problem for straight folks as well eventually. The clap is fairly common as far as STDs go for straight folks, and it's easier to spread than the AIDS. If you're non monogamous or engage in risky behavior you're putting your self at risk.

Also imagine getting drug-resistant gonorrhea of the throat  :stonk:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on June 04, 2016, 08:03:16 AM
It will for sure, I'm just saying that so much of that was directed towards gays that it is pretty clear that this is a much bigger problem with the gay community because condoms are like kryptonite to them because hey, what's the point in wearing them if you're not going to get pregnant?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Ghostse on June 04, 2016, 12:25:35 PM
It will for sure, I'm just saying that so much of that was directed towards gays that it is pretty clear that this is a much bigger problem with the gay community because condoms are like kryptonite to them because hey, what's the point in wearing them if you're not going to get pregnant?

Most faggots don't use condoms because if you use condoms it means you're gay.

Let me explain.
So its late, its after word, and Neat is getting off work. Neat doesn't feel like fighting the crowds at his usual spot, but he heard about this bar near by, and cruises over to stop in for a drink to unwind. Now, Neat had no way of knowing it was a gay bar before hand, and its too late he's 12 drinks in. He explains he's not gay to another patron who is also not gay and only comes there because the music is great. Neat is too fucked up to drive home at this point, but his new friend lives near by, and offers to let Neat crash on his couch. They stagger back, assuring the other they aren't gay but its cool if the other is, and get to the apartment. They have another good laugh about how they aren't gay, and then proceed to start fucking each other in the ass.
So, since they didn't use condoms, it was just a game of gay chicken that got out of hand. An accident, it could have happened to ANYONE.

Now if one of them had stopped long enough to put on a condom, it would mean they planned to snatch some bootyhole - and that would mean they were gay. Since it was all unprotected sex, all that happened was they just sort of tripped, fell, and someone's dick ended up in the other person's asshole, completely by accident. Happens all the time, couldn't have stopped it.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Obese and Triggered on June 04, 2016, 12:30:07 PM
It will for sure, I'm just saying that so much of that was directed towards gays that it is pretty clear that this is a much bigger problem with the gay community because condoms are like kryptonite to them because hey, what's the point in wearing them if you're not going to get pregnant?

Most faggots don't use condoms because if you use condoms it means you're gay.

Let me explain.
So its late, its after word, and Neat is getting off work. Neat doesn't feel like fighting the crowds at his usual spot, but he heard about this gym near by, and cruises over to stop in for a a few sets to unwind. Now, Neat had no way of knowing it was a gay gym before hand, and its too late he's 12 sets in. He explains he's not gay to another patron who is also not gay and only comes there because the squat racks are great. Neat is too fucked up to drive home at this point, but his new friend lives near by, and offers to let Neat crash on his couch. They stagger back, assuring the other they aren't gay but its cool if the other is, and get to the apartment. They have another good laugh about how they aren't gay, and then proceed to start fucking each other in the ass.
So, since they didn't use condoms, it was just a game of gay chicken that got out of hand. An accident, it could have happened to ANYONE.

Now if one of them had stopped long enough to put on a condom, it would mean they planned to snatch some bootyhole - and that would mean they were gay. Since it was all unprotected sex, all that happened was they just sort of tripped, fell, and someone's dick ended up in the other person's asshole, completely by accident. Happens all the time, couldn't have stopped it.

This accident happens every single week.

Fixed that for you.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 04, 2016, 02:26:57 PM
It will for sure, I'm just saying that so much of that was directed towards gays that it is pretty clear that this is a much bigger problem with the gay community because condoms are like kryptonite to them because hey, what's the point in wearing them if you're not going to get pregnant?

Most faggots don't use condoms because if you use condoms it means you're gay.

Let me explain.


So its late, its after word, and Neat is getting off work. Neat doesn't feel like fighting the crowds at his usual spot, but he heard about this gym near by, and cruises over to stop in for a a few sets to unwind. Now, Neat had no way of knowing it was a gay gym before hand, and its too late he's 12 sets in. He explains he's not gay to another patron who is also not gay and only comes there because the squat racks are great. Neat is too fucked up to drive home at this point, but his new friend lives near by, and offers to let Neat crash on his couch. They stagger back, assuring the other they aren't gay but its cool if the other is, and get to the apartment. They have another good laugh about how they aren't gay, and then proceed to start fucking each other in the ass.
So, since they didn't use condoms, it was just a game of gay chicken that got out of hand. An accident, it could have happened to ANYONE.

Now if one of them had stopped long enough to put on a condom, it would mean they planned to snatch some bootyhole - and that would mean they were gay. Since it was all unprotected sex, all that happened was they just sort of tripped, fell, and someone's dick ended up in the other person's asshole, completely by accident. Happens all the time, couldn't have stopped it.

This accident happens every single week.

Fixed that for you.

So what you're trying to say is that neat is a faggot who's probably got SUPER AIDS and SUPER CLAP?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on June 04, 2016, 02:33:19 PM
Don't kink shame.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: 888 Didnt Read Shit on June 04, 2016, 03:05:36 PM
It won't happen but I wouldn't get too discouraged.  Nationalist/far right sentiments are growing and eventually it will spill over into a majority.  Hofer's margin of loss was not possible 5-10 years ago.  Once a nationalist or far right person gets elected in a high position, the floodgates will burst open and these measures will pass left and right.

i Thought this is like their one chance?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on June 04, 2016, 08:46:04 PM
It will for sure, I'm just saying that so much of that was directed towards gays that it is pretty clear that this is a much bigger problem with the gay community because condoms are like kryptonite to them because hey, what's the point in wearing them if you're not going to get pregnant?

Most faggots don't use condoms because if you use condoms it means you're gay.

Let me explain.


So its late, its after word, and Neat is getting off work. Neat doesn't feel like fighting the crowds at his usual spot, but he heard about this gym near by, and cruises over to stop in for a a few sets to unwind. Now, Neat had no way of knowing it was a gay gym before hand, and its too late he's 12 sets in. He explains he's not gay to another patron who is also not gay and only comes there because the squat racks are great. Neat is too fucked up to drive home at this point, but his new friend lives near by, and offers to let Neat crash on his couch. They stagger back, assuring the other they aren't gay but its cool if the other is, and get to the apartment. They have another good laugh about how they aren't gay, and then proceed to start fucking each other in the ass.
So, since they didn't use condoms, it was just a game of gay chicken that got out of hand. An accident, it could have happened to ANYONE.

Now if one of them had stopped long enough to put on a condom, it would mean they planned to snatch some bootyhole - and that would mean they were gay. Since it was all unprotected sex, all that happened was they just sort of tripped, fell, and someone's dick ended up in the other person's asshole, completely by accident. Happens all the time, couldn't have stopped it.

This accident happens every single week.

Fixed that for you.

So what you're trying to say is that neat is a faggot who's probably got SUPER AIDS and SUPER CLAP?

It's OK, he's One of The Good Ones, and will thus be safe on the Day of the Rope. :joe:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: SSOUL TRANN on June 05, 2016, 06:57:59 AM
   everything is gay
X  nothing   matters
---------------------
    all is faggot



Edit:  brexit you poncy poofters!
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Dog-O-Tron 5000v4.0 on June 05, 2016, 10:18:48 AM
An interesting example from the pro-Brexit camp:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/curry-house-crisis-hots-brexit-debate-030137170.html?ref=gs

Britain has a big strand of DNA from India due to the close relationship between the two countries dating back to the Empire days. It's less like 21st century forced multiculturalism, and more akin to US melting pot mainstreaming of parts of their culture. As I understand it as a dumb 'murican, going to get Indian food is about as common as getting pizza or Chinese food in the US.

So there's a crisis with all the curry shops, because with the EU they are forced to hire Eastern Euro immigrants who don't know the food, and would rather hire people from former British colonies instead. So in this case, the former COLONIAL OPPRESSED browns, who are often fairly anglicized and have a close relationship with their former mother country would be better immigrants and workers than the literal Aryan white Europeans coming over.

So pro-EU types have to defend how it's better to hire whites than browns.

 :beepboom:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 05, 2016, 11:04:17 AM
An interesting example from the pro-Brexit camp:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/curry-house-crisis-hots-brexit-debate-030137170.html?ref=gs

Britain has a big strand of DNA from India due to the close relationship between the two countries dating back to the Empire days. It's less like 21st century forced multiculturalism, and more akin to US melting pot mainstreaming of parts of their culture. As I understand it as a dumb 'murican, going to get Indian food is about as common as getting pizza or Chinese food in the US.

So there's a crisis with all the curry shops, because with the EU they are forced to hire Eastern Euro immigrants who don't know the food, and would rather hire people from former British colonies instead. So in this case, the former COLONIAL OPPRESSED browns, who are often fairly anglicized and have a close relationship with their former mother country would be better immigrants and workers than the literal Aryan white Europeans coming over.

So pro-EU types have to defend how it's better to hire whites than browns.

 :beepboom:
An interesting example in bullshit.
Immigration for non-EU countries has to go through the home office, and after years of 'bloody foreigners coming over here and taking our jobs!', the home-office has said, 'nope, keep your raping, curry eating, street shitting asses over in India'. And why should the UK be importing even more curries into the country when there are more than enough of the smelly bastards already there with their huge extended families?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Wehrmacht Bitches At on June 07, 2016, 02:24:17 PM
Immigration for non-EU countries has to go through the home office,
Yes, I'm certain they do extensive background checks on those millions of mudslimes they're letting in. Definitely.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 07, 2016, 05:19:16 PM
Immigration for non-EU countries has to go through the home office,
Yes, I'm certain they do extensive background checks on those millions of mudslimes they're letting in. Definitely.
What does this have to do with what I said?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on June 12, 2016, 08:36:53 AM
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/11/hundreds-of-eu-referendum-postal-voting-packs-go-missing/

Quote
Hundreds of EU referendum postal voting packs have reportedly gone missing, prompting a local authority to launch an investigation.

I'm sure the authorities are working hard to get to the bottom of this, there is nothing to worry about.

 :geithner:
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on June 15, 2016, 06:20:28 AM
My favourite angry Scotsman on YT comments on the unholy alliance of modern feminism and Shariah advocates:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuf-enWAc9E
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Bitter Weirdo on June 17, 2016, 11:47:44 AM
So, in the wake of the assassination of the MP Jo Cox, the I love cock more thanSPLCdoes has decided (barely a day later) to publish receipts showing the killer purchased books from the National Alliance:

 https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/06/16/alleged-killer-british-mp-was-longtime-supporter-neo-nazi-national-alliance

Perhaps my tinfoil hat is screwed on a bit too tight, but that I wonder how the I love cock more thanSPLCdoes was able to find these particular records, on this particular guy, on the same day the assassination occurred, and while the story was still developing. They claim to have gotten the NA receipts from former members, but one wonders how they found this particular guy's info so quickly. Maybe they have all known "hate group" members indexed on a spreadsheet or something.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: food desert on June 17, 2016, 12:07:32 PM
I'm not big on conspiracy theories, but the fact that a 'remain' MP was killed by a supposed 'neo-nazi' who yelled "Britain First" while murdering her (this has been proved to be false but was widely reported) - one week before the referendum while Brexit was gaining momentum is highly I love cock more thancoincidentaldoes
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on June 17, 2016, 01:31:54 PM
It might give them a boost among long term undecided and young people, but these are usually the groups with the lowest turnout.

They'd better be weary of trying to demonize the leave side by implying they're somehow to blame (as i've seen some doing), you risk creating a counter backlash if you do it.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Virtue Signalman First Class on June 17, 2016, 02:06:37 PM
It might give them a boost among long term undecided and young people, but these are usually the groups with the lowest turnout.

They'd better be weary of trying to demonize the leave side by implying they're somehow to blame (as i've seen some doing), you risk creating a counter backlash if you do it.

It doesn't take too many undecided people to sway the vote to the other side. It's pretty much neck and neck now. There are so many fishy things surrounding this murder, especially if you consider the perp's neighbours' testimony that he showed no interest in politics whatsoever.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on June 17, 2016, 02:22:00 PM
I'm glad i'm not the only one who saw that headline and immediately put on a tin foil hat. This is some shady shit
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: POST FRANK on June 17, 2016, 02:40:32 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/06/17/exclusive-poll-eu-support-falls-after-jo-cox-murder/86031038/

Quote
Qriously, a London-based technology start-up that gathers data and intelligence about consumers through mobile phone apps, found that backing among likely voters for Britain's EU membership has dropped to 32% from 40% before her death.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on June 17, 2016, 03:30:59 PM
Disregard my previous comment then.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Kill L. Nigs on June 17, 2016, 05:56:35 PM
Yeah this pretty much killed the Brexit.

Edit: Whoops I read it wrong.  The push to leave the EU shot up after Jo Cox was killed.

Edit 2: I didn't realize that Boris Johnson, the conservative spearheading the leave movement, was such a shitlord: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Boris_Johnson

Edit 3: http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/05/boris-johnson-wins-the-spectators-president-erdogan-offensive-poetry-competition/

Quote
There was a young fellow from Ankara
Who was a terrific wankerer
Till he sowed his wild oats
With the help of a goat
But he didn’t even stop to thankera.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 18, 2016, 12:21:42 PM
I'm not big on conspiracy theories, but the fact that a 'remain' MP was killed by a supposed 'neo-nazi' who yelled "Britain First" while murdering her (this has been proved to be false but was widely reported) - one week before the referendum while Brexit was gaining momentum is highly I love cock more thancoincidentaldoes
I guess he didn't state is name as ''death to traitors, freedom for Britain'' in court this weekend either then huh?
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: Triggered by Pepe on June 18, 2016, 12:31:23 PM
This is it lads, this is the first time in my life that i've genuinely considered that the government just assassinated one of their own for the cause.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 18, 2016, 12:47:21 PM
This is it lads, this is the first time in my life that i've genuinely considered that the government just assassinated one of their own for the cause.
Wow, you're a fucking idiot.
Seems much more likely they killed one of their own than a nutjob who's a member of Britain First (photos of him were on the BF website until recently, in a politically charged atmosphere snapped and took it out on one of the 'traitors'.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on June 18, 2016, 01:31:45 PM
More than likely it was a nutjob, but boy oh boy were people quick to politicize her death, body's not even cold and they're already pinning her death on the leave side.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: RussellTShackleford on June 18, 2016, 02:59:00 PM
I don't really get the husband giving statements to press & whatnot the day of. Like if my wife just got brutally murdered I'd think I'd have other shit to do and would like the journalists to fuck off.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 18, 2016, 03:17:49 PM
More than likely it was a nutjob, but boy oh boy were people quick to politicize her death, body's not even cold and they're already pinning her death on the leave side.
Well given what he yelled, and his affiliation with Britain first, compounded with his outburst in court today...yea, the death came from the leave side.
It's the natural conclusion to a couple of decades of the political elite pointing to the EU as the reason why the rest of the population is suffering, while they stuff their pockets with taxpayer money.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on June 18, 2016, 03:48:41 PM
More than likely it was a nutjob, but boy oh boy were people quick to politicize her death, body's not even cold and they're already pinning her death on the leave side.
Well given what he yelled, and his affiliation with Britain first, compounded with his outburst in court today...yea, the death came from the leave side.
It's the natural conclusion to a couple of decades of the political elite pointing to the EU as the reason why the rest of the population is suffering, while they stuff their pockets with taxpayer money.


No you moron, a nutjob killed a woman, if it hadn't been about Britain it would have been about something else, people like that are walking timebombs.

And i'm sorry but if you wanna talk about an organization that has facilitated the very cronyism and corruption that the political elite engage in, look no further than the EU, an opaque, bureaucratic mess of an organization. 
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 18, 2016, 05:38:36 PM
More than likely it was a nutjob, but boy oh boy were people quick to politicize her death, body's not even cold and they're already pinning her death on the leave side.
Well given what he yelled, and his affiliation with Britain first, compounded with his outburst in court today...yea, the death came from the leave side.
It's the natural conclusion to a couple of decades of the political elite pointing to the EU as the reason why the rest of the population is suffering, while they stuff their pockets with taxpayer money.


No you moron, a nutjob killed a woman, if it hadn't been about Britain it would have been about something else, people like that are walking timebombs.


Yep, and the nightclub shootings a couple of weeks back had nothing to do with Islam.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: The Goon Patroon on June 18, 2016, 06:43:08 PM
More than likely it was a nutjob, but boy oh boy were people quick to politicize her death, body's not even cold and they're already pinning her death on the leave side.
Well given what he yelled, and his affiliation with Britain first, compounded with his outburst in court today...yea, the death came from the leave side.
It's the natural conclusion to a couple of decades of the political elite pointing to the EU as the reason why the rest of the population is suffering, while they stuff their pockets with taxpayer money.


No you moron, a nutjob killed a woman, if it hadn't been about Britain it would have been about something else, people like that are walking timebombs.


Yep, and the nightclub shootings a couple of weeks back had nothing to do with Islam.

Normal/Civilized people don't commit acts like this is what i'm trying to say, they may latch on to a cause but it doesn't change the fact that they're not entirely there to begin with.

You are being willingly dense.
Title: Re: Decline of the UK megathread
Post by: David Hedgehogstein on June 18, 2016, 07:00:15 PM